Gold dermatitis due to ear piercing: correlations between gold and mercury hypersensitivities

Gold induces a pseudo-allergic reaction via MRGPRX2 both in vitro and in vivo

The traditional mast cell (MC) degranulation pathway is mediated by crossing-linking of high-affinity IgE receptor (FcεRI), whereas a non-traditional, but analogous, pseudo-allergic way was recently reported to occur via Mas-Related G Protein-Coupled Receptor X2 (MRGPRX2). Severe contact hypersensitivity to metallic gold, typically considered non-sensitizing, has been reported. However, whether gold induces IgE-independent allergy remains unclear. Therefore, this study assessed the effects of gold chloride (CA) on MC activation and its relation to MRGPRX2. Our data show that CA acted on MRGPRX2 to increase cellular calcium levels and induced the release of inflammatory mediators in vitro. Compared to Mrgprb2-knockout (KO) mice, CA dose-dependently induced passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) in wild-type (WT) mice. Furthermore, peritoneal mast cells (MPMCs) were extracted from WT and Mrgprb2-KO mice and stimulated by CA, but only MPMCs from WT mice could be activated. Our results suggest that CA-induced pseudo-allergic responses are MRGPRX2 dependent.

Body-modifying concepts and dermatologic problems: tattooing and piercing

Recently, piercing and tattooing have gained increasing popularity worldwide, through all social classes and age groups. Besides pierced ear lobes, piercing of the tongue, nose, nipples, belly button, and even the genitals is quite common. The variety of tattoos range from temporary henna tattoos to permanent makeup and permanent tattoos, where the pigments are deposed in the dermis. These trends are supplemented by more invasive methods of body modification such as implanting, scarification, or branding. Parallel with the increasing popularity of piercing and tattoos, the knowledge about associated complications rose. Complications depend substantially on the circumstances in which body modifications are applied, the materials used, and the body region concerned. This article gives an overview of the most common complications of body modification methods, which mainly result from shortcomings in the application itself or in hygiene regimens. Consequences may be as severe as life-threatening events or permanent malfunction of different organs.

A pilot study on the content and the release of Ni and other allergenic metals from cheap earrings available on the Italian market

The capability of alloys used in cheap jewellery to release metal ions on contact with the skin causing allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is generally acknowledged. To reduce the diffusion of the Ni-induced ACD the Council Directive 94/27/EC [Council Directive 94/27/EC of 30 June 1994. Official Journal L 188, 22/07/1994, 1.] limited the total Ni content in alloys and its release rate in artificial sweat. In this work, three different aspects were explored: i) the frequency of skin sensitization to Ni-containing earrings in patients before and after the introduction of the Directive's limit; ii) metal composition of alloys by X-ray analysis; iii) metal leaching in artificial sweat followed by Sector Field Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (SF-ICP-MS) quantification. Well-known allergenic metals, as Ni, Cr and Co, and possible emergent allergens, as Al, Ag, Au, Cd, Cu, Fe, Ir, Mn, Pb, Pd, Pt, Rh, Sn, V and Zn, were studied. Results showed that the frequency of allergy due to earrings did not decrease after the introduction of the Ni limit: in 1994 and in 2005 patients positive to Ni patch tests were 54.3% and 53.5%, respectively. The earring components analyzed were Fe-based or alloys of Cu/Zn or Fe/Cr/Ni, plated with a thin film of precious metal (Ag, Au) which, in several cases, was combined with a Ni layer beneath. Five out of 10 items were not in compliance with the Ni Directive 94/27/EC having a total Ni content >0.05%. In three cases the release of Ni concentrations was higher than the safe sensitizing limit given by the above mentioned Regulation (i.e., <0.5 microg/cm(2)/week). The release of Cu and Zn was very variable among the different pieces (Cu: 0.134-30.9 microg/cm(2)/week; Zn: 0.141-160 microg/cm(2)/week); two objects released high amounts of Fe (358 and 586 microg/cm(2)/week) and one released considerable Mn (21 microg/cm(2)/week). Lead was released from 70% of the objects, while Ag, Al, Cd, Co, Cr and Sn from ca. 30% of the items and concentrations of these elements were well below 0.5 microg/cm(2)/week. Vanadium was released by only one item whereas Au, Ir, Pd, Pt and Rh were never leached.

Gold trichloride and gold sodium thiosulfate as markers of contact allergy to gold

The usefulness of a trivalent gold salt, gold trichloride (GTC), was evaluated as a marker of contact allergy to gold. Patients patch test-positive or patch test-negative to gold sodium thiosulfate (GSTS), 13 subjects of each, were patch tested with dilution series of GTC and equimolar concentrations of GSTS. In order to avoid false-positive and false-negative test reactions, the salts were buffered and placed on polypropene chambers. Allergic reactions were registered in 9/13 gold-allergic patients with GSTS and in 2/13 with GTC. The sum of positive reactions was 18 with GSTS and 5 with GTC. Irritant reactions were none with GSTS and 2 with GTC in the gold-allergic patients. It is concluded that GTC can elicit positive patch test reactions in patients with gold allergy but to a lesser degree when compared with GSTS. Thus, GTC cannot be recommended in patch testing, and GSTS is still the test agent of choice.

Gold: an allergen of growing significance

Gold moved into the limelight of medical literature thanks to the anti-inflammatory activity and effectiveness of gold compounds in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, but more recently also because of the growing incidence of hypersensitivity induced by it which is expressed in cutaneous and mucosal reactions. This review discusses dermatotoxicity associated with gold. In some countries gold has moved into second place as allergen, following nickel. Such recognition is mainly due to improved diagnostic methods and to its inclusion in routine dermal patch testing. Some unconventional manifestations of hypersensitivity are associated with use patterns which involve intimate contact with the metal as a component of jewelry. In-depth analysis of the growing number of cases of allergy has revealed various immunological idiosyncrasies as being characteristic of this metal. These include late reactions to challenge, extraordinary persistence of clinical effects, formation of intracutaneous nodules and immunogenic granuloma unresponsive to conventional steroid therapy, the occurrence of eczema at sites distant from the site of contact, and flare-ups of eczema upon systemic provocation with allergen which are characteristic of drug induced allergy. These manifestations demand investigations at the molecular level of the unusual mechanisms of action involved.

Patch test materials for mercury allergic contact dermatitis

The objective of this study was to define adequate patch test materials to evaluate mercury allergic contact dermatitis. We applied 0.1% and 0.05% mercuric chloride, and 0.5% and 0.2% mercury in petrolatum to systemic eczematous contact-type dermatitis (baboon syndrome), and gold-dermatitis patients. All baboon-syndrome patients reacted not only to mercuric chloride but also to metallic mercury. In gold-dermatitis patients, significantly more patients reacted to mercuric chloride than to metallic mercury (21 of 35, 60%, versus 2 of 19, 10.5%, p < 0.0005). We speculated that sensitization to mercury may be of 2 types: one a reaction to ionized mercury only, the other to both ionized mercury and non-ionized mercury. The possibility that the phenomenon is caused by differences in bioavailability or percutaneous penetration between ionized and non-ionized mercury cannot be ruled out, but could be explored by penetration measurement. For the evaluation of mercury hypersensitivity, it may be more reliable to apply both ionized and non-ionized mercury, rather than only mercuric chloride or ammoniated mercury.

Persistent cutaneous pseudolymphoma after intradermal gold injection

After intradermal testing with goldsodiumthiomalate (GSTM), 5 out of 8 patients developed skin papules at the test sites, which persisted up to 20 months. The lesions were surgically excised. Histology revealed pseudolymphoma of B and T cell type containing follicular structures and occasional small granulomas. The amount of histiocytic cells among B and T lymphocytes was pronounced, including acid cysteine proteinase inhibitor (ACPI) positive follicular dendritic cells, CD68 positive macrophages, factor XIIIa positive dermal dendrocytes and S-100 positive cells. By electron microscopy, the macrophages contained endosomes loaded with crystalloid material which contained gold in X-ray microanalysis. Atomic absorption spectrophotometry also confirmed the presence of gold in one specimen. Thus GSTM seemed to accumulate in tissue macrophages leading to constant immunologic activation with lymphoid proliferation and histiocytic response.

Contact allergy to gold in dental patients

Gold sodium thiosulphate (GSTS) in patch test series commonly yields positive reactions. In this study of dental patients, the clinical relevance of these positive reactions, the suitability of gold compounds as patch test materials, and value of the lymphocyte proliferation test in gold contact allergy, were evaluated. The frequency of positive patch test reactions to GSTS was 12.4% in the dental series. Fifty-two patients, only two of whom were male, were studied. Thirteen (25%) had had symptoms from jewellery or dental restorations. However, in most cases gold allergy was subclinical. A 10% aqueous solution of gold sodium thiomalate (GSTM) was almost as good as 0.5% GSTS in petrolatum as a marker of gold contact allergy, but 0.001% potassium dicyanoaurate (PDCA) yielded a high percentage of false-negative results. Seventy-three per cent of the subjects with positive patch tests to GSTS responded to gold compounds in vitro in the lymphocyte proliferation test, whereas 13 controls without gold contact sensitivity were negative. Consistent results in skin and lymphocyte proliferation tests provide support for the concept that gold salt-induced 'allergic-like' reactions are truly allergic in nature.

Oral lichenoid lesions, mercury hypersensitivity and combined hypersensitivity to mercury and other metals: histologically-proven reproduction of the reaction by patch testing with metal salts

We report 11 patients seen between 1991 and 1994 with oral lichenoid lesions (OLL). In 10 cases, there was contact with dental amalgam fillings, and in patient no. 10 with both amalgam restorations and a gold crown. The last patient had, in addition to her OLL, lichen planus of the skin and genital mucosa. In 5 cases, combined sensitization to mercury and other metal salts, particularly gold sodium thiosulfate (GST) and palladium chloride (PDC), was observed. In 10 patients, the lesions considerably improved or totally cleared within 1 to 9 months of replacement of restoration materials. Histological examination of biopsies from the test sites of amalgam, mercuric chloride, GST and PDC, taken 10 or 17 days after application of patch tests, showed lichenoid changes in 7 patients with at least 1 of the allergens. As at least 2 patients had inflammatory lesions of the oral mucosa related to both amalgam and gold restorations, combined sensitization to inorganic and organic mercury derivatives, GST and, in 1 case, PDC, a "dental restoration metal intolerance syndrome" is proposed.