1
|
Sukakul T, Uter W, Gonçalo M, Huggard J, Ljubojević Hadžavdić S, Schuttelaar MLA, Svedman C, Vey M, Isaksson M, Niklasson B, Rustemeyer T, Bruze M. Results of patch testing with five fragrance materials hitherto not tested: A dose-finding study in the clinical population. Contact Dermatitis 2024; 90:566-573. [PMID: 38387040 DOI: 10.1111/cod.14525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for skin sensitization is used to derive safe use levels of sensitising fragrance ingredients in products. Post-marketing surveillance of the prevalence of contact allergy to these ingredients provides relevant data to help evaluate the performance of these measures. OBJECTIVES To determine a suitable patch test concentration for five fragrance materials that had hitherto not been tested on a regular basis. These concentrations are then to be used in a surveillance study with patch testing consecutive patients over an extended monitoring period. MATERIALS AND METHODS Furaneol, CAS.3658-77-3; trans-2-hexenal, CAS.6728-26-3; 4,8-dimethyl-4,9-decadienal, CAS.71077-31-1; longifolene, CAS.475-20-7; benzaldehyde, CAS.10052-7, were patch tested with other fragrance allergens in four clinics. Patch testing was conducted in three rounds, starting with the lowest concentrations of the five ingredients. The doses were increased in the subsequent rounds if no late-appearing positive reactions and virtually no irritant reactions were reported. RESULTS Overall, 373 patients were tested. No positive allergic reaction was reported to the five ingredients. Patch test results of other fragrance allergens are reported. CONCLUSIONS The highest test concentrations are each considered safe for patch testing consecutive patients. Further surveillance based on these preparations will evaluate the hypothesis that QRA-driven consumer product levels of these fragrances can prevent sensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thanisorn Sukakul
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Margarida Gonçalo
- Department of Dermatology, Coimbra University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Joseph Huggard
- The Huggard Consulting Group, S.A.R.L., Itzig, Luxembourg
- IFRA VP Scientific Affairs and IDEA Management Team, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Suzana Ljubojević Hadžavdić
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, School of Medicine University of Zagreb, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Marie L A Schuttelaar
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Cecilia Svedman
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Matthias Vey
- The Huggard Consulting Group, S.A.R.L., Itzig, Luxembourg
- IFRA VP Scientific Affairs and IDEA Management Team, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marléne Isaksson
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Thomas Rustemeyer
- Department of Dermatology-Allergology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Magnus Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Patch Testing With Nickel Sulfate 5.0% Traces Significantly More Contact Allergy Than 2.5%: A Prospective Study Within the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Dermatitis 2022; 33:417-420. [PMID: 36125779 DOI: 10.1097/der.0000000000000935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nickel allergy is the most common contact allergy, and a nickel salt is, therefore, included in most baseline patch test series. In the baseline series of the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group and the American Contact Dermatitis Society, nickel sulfate hexahydrate (NSH) in petrolatum at 2.5% is included, whereas NSH at 5.0% is included in many other baseline series, such as the European and Swedish ones. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study is to investigate whether NSH at 5.0% detects significantly more contact allergy than NSH 2.5% when both preparations are tested simultaneously in consecutive dermatitis patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two thousand two hundred eighty-seven consecutive dermatitis patients were patch tested simultaneously with NSH in petrolatum at 2.5% and 5.0%. The allergy rates were compared for all clinics individually and combined using McNemar test, 2-sided. RESULTS Contact allergy to NSH 5.0% and 2.5% was found in 20.3% and 16.8%, respectively (P < 0.0001). In 6 of 11 clinics, significantly more patients tested positive to the higher NSH concentration. For the 2 clinics in North America combined, significantly more patients tested positive to NSH 5.0%. CONCLUSIONS The NSH preparation in the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group baseline patch test series should be considered to be changed from NSH 2.5% (1 mg NSH/cm2) to 5.0% (2 mg NSH/cm2).
Collapse
|
3
|
Mahler V, Uter W. Epicutaneous Patch Testing in Type IV Allergy Diagnostics: State of the Art and Best Practice Recommendations. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2022; 268:405-433. [PMID: 34312717 DOI: 10.1007/164_2021_508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
This chapter summarises all relevant aspects of patch testing, closely following recommendations outlined in a recent European, and a German S3 guideline on diagnostic patch testing with contact allergens and medicinal products (drugs). Patch testing is indicated in patients suspected of suffering, or having been suffering, from delayed-type hypersensitivity leading to allergic contact dermatitis or other skin and mucosal diseases. Sections of this chapter include detailed indications, reasons for possibly postponing the test, considerations on choosing haptens (contact allergens) to test, various aspects of the application of patch test allergen preparations (storage, dosing) and of testing with individual materials provided by the patients. Special aspects of patch testing in cutaneous adverse drug reactions, children, or occupational contact dermatitis are outlined. Supplemental test methods, notably the repeated open application test, are briefly described. Finally, the final evaluation in terms of assessment of clinical relevance of reactions and patient counselling are outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Mahler
- Division of Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang Y, de Graaf NPJ, Roffel S, Spiekstra SW, Rustemeyer T, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ, Bontkes H, Deng D, Gibbs S. Patch test-relevant concentrations of metal salts cause localized cytotoxicity, including apoptosis, in skin ex vivo. Contact Dermatitis 2021; 85:531-542. [PMID: 34268774 PMCID: PMC9291529 DOI: 10.1111/cod.13940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Metal alloys containing contact sensitizers (nickel, palladium, titanium) are extensively used in medical devices, in particular dentistry and orthopaedic surgery. The skin patch test is used to test for metal allergy. Objective To determine whether metal salts, when applied to freshly excised skin at patch test–relevant concentrations and using a method which mimics skin patch testing, cause in changes in the epidermis and dermis. Methods Tissue histology, apoptosis, metabolic activity, and inflammatory cytokine release were determined for two nickel salts, two palladium salts, and four titanium salts. Results Patch test–relevant concentrations of all metal salts caused localized cytotoxicity. This was observed as epidermis separation at the basement membrane zone, formation of vacuoles, apoptotic nuclei, decreased metabolic activity, and (pro)inflammatory cytokine release. Nickel(II) sulfate hexahydrate, nickel(II) chloride hexahydrate, titanium(IV) bis(ammonium lactato)dihydroxide, and calcium titanate were highly cytotoxic. Palladium(II) chloride, sodium tetrachloropalladate(II), titanium(IV) isopropoxide, and titanium(IV) dioxide showed mild cytotoxicity. Conclusion The patch test in itself may be damaging to the skin of the patient being tested. These results need further verification with biopsies obtained during clinical patch testing. The future challenge is to remain above the elicitation threshold at noncytotoxic metal concentrations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Zhang
- Department of Oral Cell Biology, Academic Centre for Dentistry (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niels P J de Graaf
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne Roffel
- Department of Oral Cell Biology, Academic Centre for Dentistry (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander W Spiekstra
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Rustemeyer
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cees J Kleverlaan
- Department of Dental Materials Science, Academic Centre for Dentistry (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert J Feilzer
- Department of Dental Materials Science, Academic Centre for Dentistry (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hetty Bontkes
- Unit Medical Immunology, Department of Clinical Chemistry, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dongmei Deng
- Department of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susan Gibbs
- Department of Oral Cell Biology, Academic Centre for Dentistry (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
A Novel Device that Reduces Preparation Times and Precision Mass Error in Patch Testing for Allergic Contact Dermatitis. Dermatitis 2020; 31:378-382. [PMID: 33186333 DOI: 10.1097/der.0000000000000594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patch test preparation for evaluation of allergic contact dermatitis is traditionally a slow process with inherent errors. OBJECTIVE A novel device, referred to as a syringer, designed to dispense 10 unique petroleum-based haptens simultaneously, significantly reduces preparation time and increases the precision of the mass dispensed per well. METHODS The syringer was custom designed and "printed" through the use of a 3-dimensional printer with a polylactic acid plastic medium. RESULTS The syringer dispensed 10 haptens significantly (P < 0.05) faster: 6.9 seconds on average, compared with 29.6 seconds by the traditional method. The syringer demonstrated a significantly (P < 0.05) lower average deviation of each strip's per-well mass average compared with the traditional method. CONCLUSIONS In practice, this syringer is ideal for preparing patient-ready patch tests in quantities of 2 identical strips or more.
Collapse
|
6
|
Mahler V, Nast A, Bauer A, Becker D, Brasch J, Breuer K, Dickel H, Drexler H, Elsner P, Geier J, John SM, Kreft B, Köllner A, Merk H, Ott H, Pleschka S, Portisch M, Spornraft-Ragaller P, Weisshaar E, Werfel T, Worm M, Schnuch A, Uter W. S3 guidelines: Epicutaneous patch testing with contact allergens and drugs - Short version, Part 1. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2020; 17:1076-1093. [PMID: 31631537 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.13956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Epicutaneous patch testing is the diagnostic standard for the detection of allergic contact dermatitis. The present guidelines are aimed at residents and board-certified physicians in the fields of dermatology and allergology as well as other medical specialties involved in establishing the indication for patch testing and its execution in patients with contact dermatitis and other forms of delayed-type hypersensitivity. The target audience also includes other health care providers and insurance funds. Based on a systematic literature search and a formal consensus process (S3), the guidelines were developed by dermatologists in collaboration with pediatricians, occupational medicine physicians, nursing staff as well as patient representatives. The systematic methodological approach and appraisal of evidence upon which the recommendations are based are outlined in a separate method report that also contains evidence tables. The guidelines address general aspects of patch testing as well as medicolegal issues. The recommendations given relate to topics such as the indication for patch testing, informed patient consent, as well as the choice of test substances, test chambers and test site, duration of exposure, reading times and interpretation of test reactions. Furthermore, recommendations are provided with respect to endogenous and exogenous factors, specific patient groups (children, pregnant women, immunosuppressed individuals) as well as possible risks and adverse events associated with patch testing using contact allergens. Note: This publication is part 1 of the short version of the S3 guidelines for "Epicutaneous patch testing using contact allergens and drugs" (registry no. 013 - 018; date: March 20, 2019; valid until December 31, 2021). Part 2 of the short version will be published in the next issue. The long version of these guidelines can be accessed at www.awmf.org. The method report is available as online publication (https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/013-018.html) and contains the evidence tables in its appendix.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Mahler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany
| | - Alexander Nast
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Dermatology, Venereology und Allergology, Division of Evidence-based Medicine (dEBM), Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea Bauer
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Dresden Technical University, Dresden, Germany
| | - Detlef Becker
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jochen Brasch
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology und Allergology, University Medical Center, Kiel, Germany
| | - Kristine Breuer
- Dermatology Practice (Dermatologie Reinbek), Reinbek, Germany
| | - Heinrich Dickel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology und Allergology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Hans Drexler
- Institute for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Friedrich--Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter Elsner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Johannes Geier
- Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), Institute at the University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Swen Malte John
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm), University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Burkhard Kreft
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | | - Hans Merk
- Professor of Dermatology and Allergology, Former Chairman of the Department of Dermatology, RWTH University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Hagen Ott
- Division of Pediatric Dermatology and Allergology, Children's Hospital Auf der Bult, Hannover, Germany
| | - Silvia Pleschka
- German Allergy and Asthma Foundation (Deutscher Allergie- und Asthmabund e.V.), Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Maria Portisch
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Petra Spornraft-Ragaller
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Dresden Technical University, Dresden, Germany
| | - Elke Weisshaar
- Division of Occupational Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Werfel
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, , Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Margitta Worm
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology und Allergology, Charité - UniversityMedicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Axel Schnuch
- Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), Institute at the University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometrics and Epidemiology (IMBE), Medical Faculty, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bruze M, Mowitz M, Netterlid E, Siemund I, Svedman C. Patch testing with aluminum chloride hexahydrate in petrolatum. Contact Dermatitis 2020; 83:176-177. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.13571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Magnus Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental DermatologyLund University, Skåne University Hospital Mamö Sweden
| | - Martin Mowitz
- Department of Occupational and Environmental DermatologyLund University, Skåne University Hospital Mamö Sweden
| | - Eva Netterlid
- Department of Occupational and Environmental DermatologyLund University, Skåne University Hospital Mamö Sweden
| | - Ingrid Siemund
- Department of Occupational and Environmental DermatologyLund University, Skåne University Hospital Mamö Sweden
| | - Cecilia Svedman
- Department of Occupational and Environmental DermatologyLund University, Skåne University Hospital Mamö Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mahler V, Nast A, Bauer A, Becker D, Brasch J, Breuer K, Dickel H, Drexler H, Elsner P, Geier J, John SM, Kreft B, Köllner A, Merk H, Ott H, Pleschka S, Portisch M, Spornraft‐Ragaller P, Weisshaar E, Werfel T, Worm M, Schnuch A, Uter W. S3‐Leitlinie: Durchführung des Epikutantests mit Kontaktallergenen und Arzneimitteln – Kurzfassung Teil 1. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2019; 17:1075-1093. [DOI: 10.1111/ddg.13956_g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Mahler
- Hautklinik Universitätsklinikum ErlangenFriedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg Erlangen
- Paul‐Ehrlich‐Institut Langen
| | - Alexander Nast
- Division of Evidence‐Based Medicine (dEBM)Klinik für DermatologieVenerologie und AllergologieCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin
| | - Andrea Bauer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav CarusTechnische Universität Dresden Dresden
| | | | - Jochen Brasch
- Klinik für DermatologieVenerologie und AllergologieUniversitätsklinikum Schleswig‐Holstein Kiel
| | | | - Heinrich Dickel
- Klinik für DermatologieVenerologie und AllergologieSt. Josef‐Hospital Ruhr‐Universität Bochum Bochum
| | - Hans Drexler
- Institut für Arbeits‐, Sozial‐ und Umweltmedizin der Friedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg Erlangen
| | - Peter Elsner
- Klinik für HautkrankheitenUniversitätsklinikum Jena Jena
| | - Johannes Geier
- Informationsverbund Dermatologischer Kliniken (IVDK) e.V. an der Universitätsmedizin Göttingen Göttingen
| | - Swen Malte John
- Institut für interdisziplinäre Dermatologische Prävention und Rehabilitation (iDerm) an der Universität Osnabrück Osnabrück
| | - Burkhard Kreft
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und VenerologieUniversitätsklinikum Halle (Saale) Halle
| | | | - Hans Merk
- Univ.‐Professor für Dermatologie & AllergologieDirektor (em.) der Hautklinik – RWTH Aachen University Aachen
| | - Hagen Ott
- Hannoversche Kinderheilanstalt (HKA): Kinder‐ und Jugendkrankenhaus auf der Bult Hannover
| | | | - Maria Portisch
- Hautklinik Universitätsklinikum ErlangenFriedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg Erlangen
| | - Petra Spornraft‐Ragaller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav CarusTechnische Universität Dresden Dresden
| | - Elke Weisshaar
- Berufsdermatologie, Hautklinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg Heidelberg
| | - Thomas Werfel
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Allergologie und VenerologieMedizinische Hochschule Hannover Hannover
| | - Margitta Worm
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie Charité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin
| | - Axel Schnuch
- Informationsverbund Dermatologischer Kliniken (IVDK) e.V. an der Universitätsmedizin Göttingen Göttingen
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Institut für Medizininformatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (IMBE)Medizinische Fakultät der Friedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg Erlangen
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stingeni L, Bianchi L, Hansel K, Corazza M, Gallo R, Guarneri F, Patruno C, Rigano L, Romita P, Pigatto PD, Calzavara-Pinton P. Italian Guidelines in Patch Testing - adapted from the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD). GIORN ITAL DERMAT V 2019; 154:227-253. [DOI: 10.23736/s0392-0488.19.06301-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
10
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current method for patch test tray assembly requires hand dispensing a small volume of hapten onto chambers. Because of human error, this technique produces inaccurate and inconsistent results. The recommended volume of hapten for patch testing using Finn Chambers is 20 μL. OBJECTIVE The aims of this study were to create a device that standardizes the delivery of 20 μL and to compare it with the current hand dispensing technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS A device, named the Revolution, was created using the SolidWorks program. Five nurses in our Contact Dermatitis Clinic were asked to load 10 Finn Chambers using the current technique and also using the Revolution. Assembly time, volume of petrolatum, and accuracy of placement were measured. After the 3 trials, the nurses completed a survey on the 2 methods. RESULTS The amount of petrolatum dispensed using the current technique ranged from 16 to 85 μL, with an average amount of 41.39 μL. The Revolution design dispensed an average of 19.78 μL. CONCLUSIONS The current hand dispensing technique does not allow for accurate and consistent dispensing of 20 μL for patch testing. In contrast, the Revolution is an accurate and consistent device that can help standardize the patch testing method.
Collapse
|
11
|
Andersen F, Hamann CR, Andersen KE, Hamann D, Sager E, Hamann C. Different concentrations and volumes of p
-phenylenediamine in pet. (equivalent doses) are associated with similar patch test outcomes: a pilot study. Contact Dermatitis 2018; 78:335-340. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Revised: 11/26/2017] [Accepted: 12/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Flemming Andersen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense 5000, Denmark, and Dermatological Investigations Scandinavia, Department of Clinical Research; University of Southern Denmark; Odense 5230 Denmark
| | - Carsten R. Hamann
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital; University of Copenhagen; Hellerup 2900 Denmark
- School of Health and Medical Science, Graduate Programme in Public Health and Epidemiology; University of Copenhagen; Copenhagen 1165 Denmark
| | - Klaus E. Andersen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense 5000, Denmark, and Dermatological Investigations Scandinavia, Department of Clinical Research; University of Southern Denmark; Odense 5230 Denmark
| | - Dathan Hamann
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine; The Ohio State University; Columbus OH 43230 USA
| | - Eric Sager
- Loma Linda University School of Medicine; Loma Linda CA 92350 USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ramzy AG, Lammintausta K, Matura M, Bråred Christensson J, Nilsson U, Hagvall L. Isothiocyanates are important as haptens in contact allergy to chloroprene rubber. Br J Dermatol 2017; 177:522-530. [PMID: 28295200 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Contact allergy to chloroprene rubber products is well known. Thiourea compounds are considered the cause of allergy. Diethylthiourea commonly occurs in this type of product and can decompose to the sensitizer ethyl isothiocyanate. OBJECTIVES To investigate the clinical importance of degradation products and metabolites from organic thioureas in contact allergy to chloroprene rubber with a focus on isothiocyanates and isocyanates. METHODS Patients with contact allergy to diphenylthiourea were patch tested with phenyl isothiocyanate and phenyl isocyanate. Patients with known contact allergy to diethylthiourea were retested with diethylthiourea, while chemical analyses of their chloroprene rubber products were performed. The stability of diethylthiourea, diphenylthiourea and dibutylthiourea in patch-test preparations was investigated. Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and solid-phase microextraction/gas chromatography were used for determination of organic thioureas and isothiocyanates. RESULTS All patients allergic to diphenylthiourea reacted to phenyl isothiocyanate, two of eight reacted to phenyl isocyanate and six of eight reacted to diphenylthiourea. Four patients allergic to diethylthiourea reacted at retest; diethylthiourea was detected in all chloroprene rubber samples, with levels of 2-1200 nmol cm-2 . At 35 °C, ethyl isothiocyanate was emitted from all samples. Patch-test preparations of diethylthiourea, diphenylthiourea and dibutylthiourea all emitted the corresponding isothiocyanate, with diethylthiourea showing the highest rate of isothiocyanate emission. CONCLUSIONS Thiourea compounds are degraded to isothiocyanates, which are generally strong or extreme sensitizers, thus acting as prehaptens. This process occurs in both chloroprene rubber products and patch-test preparations. Positive reactions to phenyl isocyanate indicate cutaneous metabolism, as the only known source of exposure to phenyl isocyanate is through bioactivation of diphenylthiourea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A G Ramzy
- Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 16, Stockholm, SE-106 91, Sweden
| | - K Lammintausta
- Department of Dermatology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, 20521, Finland
| | - M Matura
- Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Stockholm County Council and Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden
| | - J Bråred Christensson
- Department of Dermatology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 413 45, Sweden.,Dermatochemistry, Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 412 96, Sweden
| | - U Nilsson
- Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 16, Stockholm, SE-106 91, Sweden
| | - L Hagvall
- Department of Dermatology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 413 45, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Horita K, Horita D, Tomita H, Yasoshima M, Yagami A, Matsunaga K. Effects of different base agents on prediction of skin irritation by sodium lauryl sulfate using patch testing and repeated application test. Toxicology 2017; 382:10-15. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2017.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2016] [Revised: 02/25/2017] [Accepted: 03/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
14
|
Hagvall L, Niklasson IB, Rudbäck J, O'Boyle NM, Niklasson E, Luthman K, Karlberg AT. Assessment of cross-reactivity of new less sensitizing epoxy resin monomers in epoxy resin-allergic individuals. Contact Dermatitis 2016; 75:144-50. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2016] [Revised: 05/04/2016] [Accepted: 05/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Hagvall
- Department of Dermatology; Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg; 405 03 Gothenburg Sweden
| | - Ida B. Niklasson
- Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, Dermatochemistry; University of Gothenburg; 412 96 Gothenburg Sweden
| | - Johanna Rudbäck
- Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, Dermatochemistry; University of Gothenburg; 412 96 Gothenburg Sweden
- Department of Radiology and Medicine Laboratory, Clinical Chemistry; Södra Älvsborg Hospital; 501 82 Borås Sweden
| | - Niamh M. O'Boyle
- Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, Dermatochemistry; University of Gothenburg; 412 96 Gothenburg Sweden
- School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute; Dublin Ireland
| | - Eva Niklasson
- Department of Dermatology; Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg; 405 03 Gothenburg Sweden
| | - Kristina Luthman
- Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, Medicinal Chemistry; University of Gothenburg; 412 96 Gothenburg Sweden
| | - Ann-Therese Karlberg
- Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, Dermatochemistry; University of Gothenburg; 412 96 Gothenburg Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Johansen JD, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, Andersen KE, Bircher A, Bruze M, Cannavó A, Giménez-Arnau A, Gonçalo M, Goossens A, John SM, Lidén C, Lindberg M, Mahler V, Matura M, Rustemeyer T, Serup J, Spiewak R, Thyssen JP, Vigan M, White IR, Wilkinson M, Uter W. European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing - recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis 2015; 73:195-221. [PMID: 26179009 DOI: 10.1111/cod.12432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 910] [Impact Index Per Article: 101.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2015] [Revised: 04/29/2015] [Accepted: 05/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The present guideline summarizes all aspects of patch testing for the diagnosis of contact allergy in patients suspected of suffering, or having been suffering, from allergic contact dermatitis or other delayed-type hypersensitivity skin and mucosal conditions. Sections with brief descriptions and discussions of different pertinent topics are followed by a highlighted short practical recommendation. Topics comprise, after an introduction with important definitions, materials, technique, modifications of epicutaneous testing, individual factors influencing the patch test outcome or necessitating special considerations, children, patients with occupational contact dermatitis and drug eruptions as special groups, patch testing of materials brought in by the patient, adverse effects of patch testing, and the final evaluation and patient counselling based on this judgement. Finally, short reference is made to aspects of (continuing) medical education and to electronic collection of data for epidemiological surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne D Johansen
- Department of Dermato-Allergology, National Allergy Research Centre, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Kristiina Aalto-Korte
- Occupational Medicine, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 00250 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tove Agner
- Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Klaus E Andersen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Andreas Bircher
- Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital and University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Magnus Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, SE-20502 Malmö, Sweden
| | - Alicia Cannavó
- Hospital Municipal de Vicente López 'Profesor Bernard Houssay', Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ana Giménez-Arnau
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Margarida Gonçalo
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - An Goossens
- Contact Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital K. U. Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Swen M John
- Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine, Health Theory, University of Osnabrueck, D-49069 Osnabrueck, Germany
| | - Carola Lidén
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Magnus Lindberg
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Örebro, SE-70185 Örebro, Sweden
| | - Vera Mahler
- Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Mihály Matura
- Unit of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, SLSO, SE-11365 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Thomas Rustemeyer
- Department of Dermatology, VU University Medical Centre, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jørgen Serup
- Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Radoslaw Spiewak
- Department of Experimental Dermatology and Cosmetology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-688 Krakow, Poland
| | - Jacob P Thyssen
- Department of Dermato-Allergology, National Allergy Research Centre, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Martine Vigan
- Department of Dermatology, CHRU Besançon, 25030 Besançon Cedex, France
| | - Ian R White
- Department of Cutaneous Allergy, St John's Institute of Dermatology, St Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | | | - Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hagvall L, Berglund V, Bråred Christensson J. Air-oxidized linalyl acetate - an emerging fragrance allergen? Contact Dermatitis 2015; 72:216-23. [PMID: 25645423 DOI: 10.1111/cod.12350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2014] [Revised: 12/08/2014] [Accepted: 12/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Linalyl acetate is a fragrance chemical that is prone to autoxidation. Exposure to linalyl acetate occurs through cosmetic products and essential oils, but is difficult to assess, as linalyl acetate is not labelled in the EU. OBJECTIVE To investigate the frequencies of contact allergy to oxidized linalyl acetate among dermatitis patients, and to investigate the autoxidation of linalyl acetate in terms of hydroperoxide formation and sensitization potency. PATIENTS AND METHODS Hydroperoxide formation in air-exposed linalyl acetate was determined with high-performance liquid chromatography. The sensitization potencies of hydroperoxides were determined with the local lymph node assay. One thousand seven hundred and seventeen patients were patch tested with oxidized linalyl acetate at 6.0% in petrolatum. RESULTS Of the patients, 2.2% showed positive reactions to oxidized linalyl acetate. Forty-three per cent of the positive patients also had positive patch test reactions to other fragrance markers. Linalyl acetate hydroperoxides were detected early in the autoxidation process, and accumulated to a concentration of 37% after 42 weeks of air exposure. The linalyl acetate hydroperoxides were classified as moderate sensitizers. CONCLUSIONS The frequency of positive reactions to oxidized linalyl acetate is comparable to that of previously studied oxidized fragrance terpenes. Oxidized linalyl acetate could thus be a common fragrance contact allergen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Hagvall
- Department of Dermatology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gröna stråket 16, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Andersch Björkman Y, Hagvall L, Siwmark C, Niklasson B, Karlberg AT, Bråred Christensson J. Air-oxidized linalool elicits eczema in allergic patients - a repeated open application test study. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70:129-38. [PMID: 24588367 DOI: 10.1111/cod.12163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2013] [Revised: 09/11/2013] [Accepted: 09/24/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Linalool is a commonly used fragrance terpene that forms potent sensitizers upon oxidation. In a recent multicentre study, we found that 7% of 2900 patients showed positive patch test reactions to oxidized linalool at 6.0%. No elicitation studies have been performed. OBJECTIVE To identify threshold concentrations for elicitation of allergic contact dermatitis caused by oxidized linalool in allergic individuals with repeated exposures. METHODS Repeated open application tests were performed in 6 participants previously diagnosed with contact allergy to oxidized linalool. Creams containing 3.0%, 1.0% and 0.30% oxidized linalool (corresponding to 0.56%, 0.19% and 0.056% linalool hydroperoxides, respectively) and 'fine fragrance' containing 1.0%, 0.30% and 0.10% oxidized linalool (corresponding to 0.19%, 0.056% and 0.019% linalool hydroperoxides, respectively) were used twice daily for up to 3 weeks. Patch testing with a dilution series of oxidized linalool was performed. RESULTS Five of 6 participants reacted to the cream containing 3% oxidized linalool. With 1% oxidized linalool, a reaction was seen in 3 (cream) and 4 (fine fragrance) participants, respectively. With 0.3% oxidized linalool, 2 (cream) and 1 (fine fragrance) participants reacted. CONCLUSION Repeated exposure to low concentrations of oxidized linalool can elicit allergic contact dermatitis in previously sensitized individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ylva Andersch Björkman
- Department of Dermatology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ale IS, Maibach HA. Diagnostic approach in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2014; 6:291-310. [DOI: 10.1586/eci.10.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
19
|
Gente Lidholm A, Bergfors E, Inerot A, Blomgren U, Gillstedt M, Trollfors B. Unexpected loss of contact allergy to aluminium induced by vaccine. Contact Dermatitis 2013; 68:286-92. [PMID: 23601064 PMCID: PMC3734622 DOI: 10.1111/cod.12053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Background In studies in Gothenburg, Sweden, in the 1990s of an aluminium hydroxide-adsorbed pertussis toxoid vaccine, 745 of ∼76 000 vaccinated children developed long-lasting itchy subcutaneous nodules at the vaccination site. Of 495 children with itchy nodules patch tested for aluminium allergy, 376 (76%) were positive. Objectives To study the prognosis of the vaccine-induced aluminium allergy. Patients and methods Two hundred and forty-one children with demonstrated aluminium allergy in the previous study were patch tested again 5–9 years after the initial test, with the same procedure as used previously. Results Contact allergy to aluminium was no longer demonstrable in 186 of the retested 241 children (77%). A negative test result was more common in children who no longer had itching at the vaccination site; it was also related to the age of the child, the time after the first aluminium-adsorbed vaccine dose, and the strength of the reaction in the first test. Conclusions Patch test reactivity to aluminium seems to disappear or weaken with time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anette Gente Lidholm
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
|
21
|
Bruze M, Engfeldt M, Gonçalo M, Goossens A. Recommendation to include methylisothiazolinone in the European baseline patch test series - on behalf of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis and the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Contact Dermatitis 2013; 69:263-70. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2013] [Revised: 08/05/2013] [Accepted: 08/11/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Magnus Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Skåne University Hospital, Lund University; Malmö Sweden
| | - Malin Engfeldt
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Skåne University Hospital, Lund University; Malmö Sweden
| | - Margarida Gonçalo
- Department of Dermatology; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital; Coimbra Portugal
| | - An Goossens
- Department of Dermatology, Contact Allergy Unit; University Hospital KU Leuven; Leuven Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hamann C, Zimerson E, Hamann D, Laugesen L, Carlsson B, Nathansen C, Hamann C, Bruze M. Concentration variability of potent allergens of p-tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin (PTBP-FR) in patch test preparations and commercially available PTBP-FR. Br J Dermatol 2012; 166:761-70. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10781.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
23
|
Svedman C, Isaksson M, Björk J, Mowitz M, Bruze M. ‘Calibration’ of our patch test reading technique is necessary. Contact Dermatitis 2012; 66:180-7. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.02044.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
24
|
Doumit J, Pratt M. Comparative Study of IQ-Ultra and Finn Chambers Test Methodologies in Detecting 10 Common Standard Allergens that Cause Allergic Contact Dermatitis. J Cutan Med Surg 2012; 16:18-22. [DOI: 10.1177/120347541201600105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background: Patch testing is routinely used in contact dermatitis clinics because it is the gold standard for the evaluation of potential allergic contact dermatitis. Objective: The study was undertaken to evaluate possible differences in reactivity between the Finn Chamber and IQ-Ultra patch-testing methodologies. Methods: Patients were patch-tested simultaneously with the Finn Chamber and IQ-Ultra patch tests. Ten standard allergens set by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group were used for both techniques. Results: Both patch tests had a significant agreement in detecting all of the allergens. An “almost perfect agreement” was noted for ethylenediamine dihydrochloride, quaternium-15, mercapto mix, black rubber mix, balsam of Peru, and nickel sulfate; “substantial agreement” for formaldehyde, bisphenol A epoxy resin, and 4-tert-butylphenol formaldehyde resin; and “moderate agreement” for potassium dichromate. Conclusion: The Finn Chamber and IQ-Ultra patch tests had a good agreement in the detection of the 10 standard allergens that were tested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Doumit
- Division of Dermatology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - Melanie Pratt
- Division of Dermatology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hillen U, Dickel H, Löffler H, Pfützner W, Mahler V, Becker D, Brasch J, Worm M, Fuchs T, John SM, Geier J. Late reactions to patch test preparations with reduced concentrations of p-phenylenediamine: a multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Contact Dermatitis 2011; 64:196-202. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01855.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
26
|
Aeby P, Sieber T, Beck H, Gerberick GF, Goebel C. Skin sensitization to p-phenylenediamine: the diverging roles of oxidation and N-acetylation for dendritic cell activation and the immune response. J Invest Dermatol 2008; 129:99-109. [PMID: 18704111 DOI: 10.1038/jid.2008.209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Skin is a target of allergic reactions to aromatic amine hair dye precursors, such as p-phenylenediamine (PPD). As conversion of PPD on or in the skin is expected to be required for the induction of allergic contact dermatitis, we analyzed the role of oxidation and N-acetylation as major transformation steps. PPD and its oxidative and N-acetylated derivatives were tested for their sensitizing potential in vitro using a dendritic cell (DC) activation assay and in vivo using the local lymph node assay (LLNA). PPD did not induce relevant DC activation but induced a positive LLNA response. In contrast, DC activation was obtained when PPD was chemically pre-oxidized or after air oxygen exposure. Under both conditions, the potent sensitizing PPD oxidation product Bandrowski's base was identified along with other di- and trimeric species, indicating that PPD oxidation products provide an effective immune stimulation (danger signal). In contrast mono- and diacetylated PPD did not induce DC activation or a positive LLNA response. We conclude that dermal N-acetylation of PPD competes with the formation of oxidized PPD whereas skin exposure conditions allowing auto-oxidation, as in the LLNA, provide an effective danger signal necessary to induce skin sensitization to PPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Aeby
- Procter and Gamble Co., Wella-Cosmital, Marly, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zapolanski T, Maibach HI. Mystery of the disappearing allergen: published allergens rarely seen again. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2008; 27:15-9. [PMID: 18330830 DOI: 10.1080/15569520701856757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Patch testing is an important tool in the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis. Although this technique can be accurate, occasionally the results may be inconclusive. A previously positive result to an allergen may become negative upon repeat testing, and this may complicate the process of achieving a definitive diagnosis. There are some potential explanations for such inconsistencies, including the Excited Skin Syndrome, irritant reactions, a need to repeat the diagnostic algorithm, "rogue" reactions, and "contact allergy." These explanations should be taken into account when interpreting these results. However, further knowledge is needed to solve the mystery of an allergen that subsequently disappears.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamar Zapolanski
- University of California Medical School, San Francisco, California 94143-0989, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Frick-Engfeldt M, Isaksson M, Zimerson E, Bruze M. How to optimize patch testing with diphenylmethane diisocyanate. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 57:138-51. [PMID: 17680861 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01197.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
We have previously shown that patch test preparations of polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyanate (PMDI) are more stable than preparations of diphenylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate (4,4'-MDI). This study was conducted to (i) investigate whether PMDIs yield as many positive reactions as 4,4'-MDI, (ii) study concurrent reactions to 4,4'-MDI and 4,4'-diaminodiphenylmethane (4,4'-MDA), and (iii) follow the course of positive reactions during 4 weeks. It was shown that PMDIs detect as many positive reactions as 4,4'-MDI. Thus, they are better patch test agents being more stable than preparations of 4,4'-MDI. We recommend that PMDIs with a monomer content of at least 35% is used in 2.0% petrolatum (pet.) (i.e. monomer patch test concentration approximately 0.7%). It was shown that reactions to 4,4'-MDI and PMDIs appear late and we recommend readings on both day (D) 3/4 and D7. 4,4'-MDA was shown to be a good marker for 4,4'-MDI and patch testing with 4,4'-MDA in 0.25% pet. can be used instead of PMDI. Concomitant reactions to 4,4'-MDI and 4,4'-MDA are probably not caused by conversion of 4,4'-MDI into 4,4'-MDA by reaction with water. Another explanation is a path of reactions leading to ureas and MDI conjugates with skin constituents, which are hydrolysed into 4,4'-MDA. This complex process depends upon several factors and might explain why positive MDI reactions appear after D7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malin Frick-Engfeldt
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, S-205 02 Malmö, Sweden.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
|
30
|
Bruze M, Isaksson M, Gruvberger B, Frick-Engfeldt M. Recommendation of appropriate amounts of petrolatum preparation to be applied at patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 56:281-5. [PMID: 17441852 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01098.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No recommendation exists on the amount of petrolatum (pet.) preparation to be applied in a Finn Chamber or van der Bend Chamber. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine the appropriate amount of pet. preparation to apply in the Finn and van der Bend chambers. METHODS 12 volunteers were patch tested with green-coloured pet. in Finn and van der Bend chambers on the back on 3 occasions. Doses were 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 mg initially and on second and third occasion, 10 mg was removed in van der Bend Chambers and 35 mg was added. On day 2, the test sites were scored. A negative test equalled a test area not covered to 100%. A positive test meant a completely green-coloured test area. Minor and major spreading was noted. The amount of pet. preparation yielding at most 5% negative reactions and having the least number of reactions with major spreading equalled the appropriate amount. RESULTS For van der Bend Chambers, all doses yielded more than 5% negative reactions. For the Finn Chamber, 30, 25, and 20 mg pet. yielded less than 5% negative reactions and with major spreading in 60%, 40%, and 25% of test sites. CONCLUSIONS 20 mg pet. preparation was the optimal dose for the Finn Chambers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magnus Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|