Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the elderly

Treatment of older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The treatment of older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is an unmet medical need. With increasing age, ALL patients have a significantly lower clinical remission rate, higher early mortality, higher relapse rate, and poorer survival compared with younger patients. This is only partly explained by a higher incidence of poor prognostic factors in the older age group. Most importantly, intensive chemotherapy with or without stem cell transplantation (SCT) is less well tolerated in older patients. Some progress has been made with delivering age-adapted, moderately intensive chemotherapy protocols for Ph/BCR-ABL-negative ALL and combinations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors with chemotherapy in Ph/BCR-ABL-positive ALL. For the future, optimizing supportive care, introducing targeted therapies, novel immunotherapies, moderately intensified consolidation strategies, and reduced intensity SCT are promising approaches. Prospective clinical trials for older patients are urgently needed to test these approaches.

Philadelphia Chromosome-positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the Elderly: Prognostic Factors and Treatment Outcome

Data on all patients diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) aged 55 or older, seen in our institution over a 17-year period, were studied to determine the incidence and range of clinical and biological subtypes, and the outcome of different therapeutic approaches. Twenty-five Ph+ ALL cases (median age: 64 years) were diagnosed between 1986 and 2003 (28% of all B-lineage elderly ALL seen during this period). Karyotypic analysis was performed successfully in 22 cases, while 3 were only diagnosed by molecular biology analysis. All patients had B-cell lineage ALL. Co-expression of myeloid markers was observed in 20% of tested cases. One patient died before chemotherapy could be given. All other patients received "curative" treatment according to different protocols used during the period of study. Overall the complete remission (CR) rate was 76% (95% confidence interval, CI: 55-91%). Fifteen patients achieved CR after one course of chemotherapy and 4 patients after salvage therapy. Median disease-free survival (DFS) of the entire cohort was 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.5-8.4 months) and median overall survival was 10.1 months (95% CI: 7.9-13 months). In multivariate analysis, age>or=70 years was of poor prognostic value for achieving CR (p=0.05) and hyperleukocytosis at diagnosis was of poor prognostic value for overall survival (p=0.001). Overall survival duration was not significantly influenced by achieving CR. Ph+ ALL patients did not show a significant difference in terms of outcome as compared with Philadelphia-negative ALL patients. The very poor overall outcome in elderly patients with Ph+ ALL may be significantly improved by the introduction of imatinib mesylate into current treatment regimens.

How I treat older patients with ALL

The treatment of older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is an unmet medical need. In Western countries, the population is aging, which means there will be an increasing number of older patients. However, in the past few decades, there has been little improvement in treating them, and few clinical trials specifically designed for older patients with ALL have been reported. Older patients with ALL have a significantly lower complete response rate, higher early mortality, higher relapse rate, and poorer survival compared with younger patients. This is partly explained by a higher incidence of poor prognostic factors. Most importantly, intensive chemotherapy with or without stem cell transplantation, both of which are successful in younger patients, is less well tolerated in older patients. For the future, the most promising approaches are optimized supportive care, targeted therapies, moderately intensified consolidation, and reduced-intensity stem cell transplantation. One of the most important challenges for physicians is to differentiate between fit and unfit older patients in order to offer both groups optimal treatment regarding toxicity and mortality risks, quality of life, and long-term outcome. Prospective trials for older patients with ALL are urgently needed.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in elderly patients: a single institution's experience

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We investigated the clinical characteristics and prognosis of elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical data, laboratory findings, bone marrow findings, and cytogenetic analysis of elderly patients (≥ 60 years) with ALL, and data of an additional 101 younger adult patients (< 60 years) with ALL were reviewed for comparison.

RESULTS

Twenty-six elderly patients (≥ 60 years) and 101 younger adult patients (< 60 years) with ALL were retrospectively enrolled. The median follow-up duration was 6.0 months (range, 0.4 to 113.2) in the elderly patients and 21.7 months (range, 1.0 to 122.7) in the adult patients. In total, 34.6% (9 patients) of the elderly patients and 24.8% (25 patients) of the adult patients had Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL. The overall complete remission (CR) rate was much higher in the younger than in the elderly patients (94.1% vs. 57.7%, p < 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) of the younger patients (< 60 years) was 26.3 months, whereas that of the elderly patients (≥ 60 years) was 10.3 months (p = 0.003). In the elderly patients with ALL, T cell lineage and the presence of lymphadenopathy were significant prognostic factors for OS in a univariate analysis (p = 0.033 and 0.041, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of Korean elderly patients with ALL were poor, and the shorter OS was mainly due to the low CR rate. T-cell lineage and the presence of lymphadenopathy were significant prognostic factors in Korean elderly patients with ALL.

A randomized study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus continuous-infusion doxorubicin in elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the GRAALL-SA1 study

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the elderly is poor. The GRAALL-SA1 phase II, randomized trial compared the efficacy and toxicity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus continuous-infusion doxorubicin in patients 55 years or older with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Sixty patients received either continuous-infusion doxorubicin (12 mg/m(2)/day) and continuous-infusion vincristine (0.4 mg/day) on days 1-4 or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m(2)) and standard vincristine (2 mg) on day 1, accompanied by dexamethasone, followed at day 28 by a second cycle, reinforced by cyclophosphamide. End-points were safety, outcome and prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Myelosuppression was reduced in the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin arm with shorter severe neutropenia (P=0.05), shorter severe thrombocytopenia (P=0.03), and fewer red blood cell transfusions (P=0.04). Grade 3/4 infections and Gram-negative bacteremia were reduced in the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin arm (P=0.04 and P=0.02, respectively). There was a trend towards fewer cardiac events among the patients who received pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (1/29 versus 6/31). The complete remission rate was 82% and, with a median follow-up of 4 years, median event-free survival and overall survival were 9 and 10 months, respectively. Despite the better tolerance of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, no differences in survival were observed between the two arms, due to trends towards more induction refractoriness (17 versus 3%, P=0.10) and a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (52% versus 32% at 2 years, P=0.20) in the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin arm.

CONCLUSIONS

With the drug schedules used in this study, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin did not improve the outcome of elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia despite reduced toxicities.

Two "childhood" malignancies in an elderly individual: a case report and discussion

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft-tissue tumor in childhood, but is extremely rare in elderly. We present a rare case of cardiac RMS, which developed 1 year after the diagnosis and management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a 68-year-old female. The occurrence of such phenomena is intriguing, especially in an individual without prior history of malignancy at a younger age. Through the review of the existing literature, we attempt to approach the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of this rare clinical entity.

Comparison of two regimens for the treatment of elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL)

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) represents a rare malignancy in the elderly and few authors have specifically focused on the treatment of ALL in this setting. We recently published the results of a prospective phase II study comprising an induction therapy with vincristine, Daunoxome and dexamethasone (VDXD) given to 15 patients aged 60 years. Here, we update the results after enrolling 17 patients, and we compare these with the results obtained in 17 elderly patients treated according to the GIMEMA ALL 0288 protocol. With the VDXD combination, elderly ALL had a higher CR rate (76.5%) than with the 0288 protocol (41%), and it was likely due to both lower induction mortality (17.5% vs. 35%) and a less resistant disease (6% vs. 24%). Infectious complications were more frequent with the VDXD combination whereas non-hematological side effects were comparable. Despite the similar DFS obtained with the two induction treatments, median EFS (3.9 months with 0288 vs. 12.8 with VDXD; p = 0.0486) and OS (4.5 vs. 21 months; p = 0.0239) were significantly higher with the VDXD regimen. In elderly ALL patients the administration of high-dose daunorubicin as a liposomal compound is feasible and seems able to improve CR rate, EFS and OS without increase in toxicity.

Chemotherapy of acute leukemia in adults

BACKGROUND

General therapeutic options for adult patients with acute leukemia are reviewed and specific new treatment strategies are described.

OBJECTIVE

Treatment results and controversial issues on current and future antileukemic strategies are discussed.

METHODS

Data in this review came from the published literature.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

In the past years, striking new developments have been noticeable in the treatment of adult acute leukemia. However, the overall outcome of adult acute leukemia remains poor, particularly in older patients. Intensive chemotherapy remains the standard for leukemia treatment but several approaches using new cytotoxic agents seem promising. Therapeutic targeting of specific biologic abnormalities present in the leukemia cell population might, in a near future, improve outcome of adult leukemia patients.

Imatinib compared with chemotherapy as front-line treatment of elderly patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL)

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) have a poor prognosis, with a low complete remission (CR) rate, high induction mortality, and short remission duration. Imatinib (IM) has a favorable toxicity profile but limited antileukemic activity in advanced Ph+ALL. Imatinib in combination with intensive chemotherapy has yielded promising results as front-line therapy, but its value as monotherapy in newly diagnosed Ph+ALL is not known.

METHODS

Patients with de novo Ph+ALL were randomly assigned to induction therapy with either imatinib (Ind(IM)) or multiagent, age-adapted chemotherapy (Ind(chemo)). Imatinib was subsequently coadministered with consolidation chemotherapy.

RESULTS

In all, 55 patients (median age, 68 years) were enrolled. The overall CR rate was 96.3% in patients randomly assigned to Ind(IM) and 50% in patients allocated to Ind(chemo) (P = .0001). Nine patients (34.6%) were refractory and 2 patients died during Ind(chemo); none failed imatinib induction. Severe adverse events were significantly more frequent during Ind(chemo) (90% vs 39%; P = .005). The estimated overall survival (OS) of all patients was 42% +/- 8% at 24 months, with no significant difference between the 2 cohorts. Median disease-free survival was significantly longer in the 43% of patients (21 of 49 evaluable) in whom BCR-ABL transcripts became undetectable (18.3 months vs 7.2 months; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

In elderly patients with de novo Ph+ALL, imatinib induction results in a significantly higher CR rate and lower toxicity than induction chemotherapy. With subsequent combined imatinib and chemotherapy consolidation, this initial benefit does not translate into improved survival compared with chemotherapy induction.

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia in Elderly Patients

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is a rare disease in the elderly. The prevalence of ALL in patients >60 years of age is reported to be between 16% and 31% of all adult cases. The biology of ALL in older patients seems to be significantly different from that in younger patients and may, at least in part, explain poor treatment outcome. Immunophenotyping and cytogenetic characteristics are among the most important biological differences in comparison with younger adults. The frequency of pre B-cell ALL and common ALL is higher and T-cell ALL subtype is under-represented in elderly populations compared with younger patients. The frequency of the Philadelphia chromosome also seems to increase with age and adversely influences complete remission rate and survival. Few reports on the effectiveness and toxicity of therapeutic programmes concerning exclusively older patients with ALL have been published so far and only some of them were prospective studies. In some of the studies age-adapted approaches have been applied in which protocols processed earlier for younger patients have been adopted for older patients. In such modified protocols chemotherapy was usually less aggressive, especially if it was given for patients with comorbidities and poor performance status. Consequently, in several studies elderly patients received suboptimal treatment. Death during induction chemotherapy was observed in 7-42% of the patients in particular reports. The overall response rate varied from 12% to 85%. The median overall survival (OS) durations in patients who received a curative approach ranged from 3 to 14 months and from 1 to 14 months in patients treated palliatively. Poor performance status, comorbidities and high early mortality during intensive chemotherapy are the main reasons for poor treatment results and short OS time. New therapeutic approaches are necessary to improve the outcome in this age group of patients with ALL.

Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the elderly: an evaluation of interferon alpha given as a single agent after complete remission

Although interferon (IFN) has been used in elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the benefits from IFN therapy have not been properly assessed, especially as it was given combined with other cytotoxic drugs, which obscured the role of IFN if any. In 1997, we started a study aimed at improving our previous results in elderly patients with ALL and at assessing the therapeutic role of IFN in this disease. Fifty-eight patients with ALL, aged 55-81 years (median: 64.9 years), were randomly allocated to treatment with vindesine or vincristine during induction. After a first consolidation course, IFN was administered as a single agent for three months together with cranial radiotherapy. Chemotherapy was then resumed with a second consolidation course and maintenance. A complete remission (CR) was obtained in 58% of patients (CI: 45-71%), significantly less than in our previous study which included IFN combined with chemotherapy during maintenance (CR: 85%, CI:70-94%, p = 0.007). Overall survival (median: 289 vs 434 days in the previous study, p = 0.01) and disease-free survival (median: 146 vs 427 days, p = 0.009) were also inferior in the present study. In particular, the pattern of relapses over time suggested that the 3 month IFN treatment phase with no additional chemotherapy might have contributed to the comparatively poor outcome of this cohort. In addition, vindesine given during induction did not prove less neurotoxic than vincristine, did not improve the CR rate, and had no impact on survival. In conclusion, although similar to published studies in elderly patients with ALL, this study is inferior to our previous one. INF, given as a single drug, has a modest role if any in the treatment of older persons with ALL.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the elderly: The Edouard Herriot Hospital experience

Data on all patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) aged 60 or older, referred to our institution over a 18-year period, were studied to determine the incidence and range of clinical and biological subtypes, and the outcome of different therapeutic approaches. Sixty-nine ALL cases (median age: 68 years) were diagnosed between 1980 and 1998 (18% of all adult ALL seen during this period). Ten of them (14%) had a past history of previous malignancy. Karyotypic analysis was performed successfully in 42 cases. Ten patients were diagnosed as Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph(+)) ALL. Immunophenotyping was performed in 63 cases. Fifty-six patients had B-cell lineage ALL. T lymphoid markers were observed only in 5 cases. Co-expression of myeloid markers was observed in 19% of tested cases. Five patients died before any chemotherapy could be given. All other patients received "curative" treatment according to different protocols used during the period of study. Overall complete remission (CR) rate of these patients was 62% (95% confidence interval (CI): 50-74%). Thirty-nine patients achieved CR after one course of chemotherapy and 4 patients after salvage therapy. Median disease-free survival (DFS) of the entire cohort was 8.3 months (95% CI: 5-12.8 months) and median overall survival was 7 months (95% CI: 6-10 months). In multivariate analysis, the presence of hemorrhage (P = 0.02) was a poor prognostic for CR achievement. Higher WHO performance status (P = 0.003) and the presence of hemorrhage (P = 0.01) at diagnosis were poor prognostics for overall survival. When patients were stratified into three groups according to the time of admission, survival appeared significantly longer for patients admitted between July 1992 and December 1998 (median overall survival at 10 months) than for patients admitted before July 1992 (P = 0.04). "Age-adapted" therapy appeared superior to "young adult-like" therapy in terms of CR rate (96% versus 60%; P = 0.007). However, "age-adapted" therapy did not show any advantage in terms of DFS or overall survival, making the difference in CR rates questionable. We conclude that the pejorative overall outcome in elderly ALL points to the need for new therapeutic trials taking into account the specific characteristics of ALL in this age group.

Therapeutic management of hematological malignancies in elderly patients. Biological and clinical considerations. Part 1. Myelodysplasias and the acute leukemias

The different therapeutic options that may be employed in the treatment of elderly patients with acute leukemias and myelodysplastic states are considered following an analysis of certain biological features, that have been investigated by cytochemical, cytogenetic and cytokinetic techniques, immunophenotyping, and studies on G-6-PD isoenzymes. These studies imply that in the elderly the pattern of hematological malignancies and the lack of response to conventional treatment derive from intrinsic biological differences between these pathological states in older and younger patients. Treatment in elderly patients has ranged from palliative treatment to intensive chemotherapy, often with disappointing results in both cases. Palliative treatment does not induce remissions, and median survival is short. On the other hand, elderly patients do not tolerate well both induction and post-remission therapy due to the degree of toxicity and the effects of drug-induced pancytopenia. In this scenario, in vitro drug-sensitivity testing and karyotyping assume increasing importance, because they may predict which patients are likely to benefit from intensive therapy. In both acute leukemias and myelodysplasias, treatment ideally should be designed case by case, according to the hematological, clinical and biological features.

Age-adapted moderate-dose induction and flexible outpatient postremission therapy for elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

We report the results of a recent trial in elderly acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients (> or = 60 years). Initial chemotherapy consisted of one 14-day course with single-dose idarubicin plus vincristine-prednisone-L-asparaginase. Idarubicin was preferred to other anthracyclines because of its shorter time to response. Sequential outpatient postremission therapy included single-dose idarubicin plus vincristine-cyclophosphamide-L-asparaginase pulses, cranial irradiation with intrathecal methotrexate-cytarabine, flexible weekly vincristine-cyclophosphamide alternating with cytarabine-teniposide, and two-year standard maintenance with mercaptopurine-methotrexate. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was added to induction and early consolidation courses. Twenty-two patients mainly with high-risk features entered the study: median age was 64 years (60-73), 40% of cases were CD10- B-lineage and T-lineage ALL, 38% of CD10+ B-lineage ALL carried a BCR-ABL rearrangement, while 23% coexpressed myeloid antigen, 86% had L2 morphology, 50% had a blast count greater than 10 x 10(9)/1, 54% had hepato-splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy. The complete remission (CR) rate after induction therapy was 59%. A partial remission was obtained in two cases. There were four early deaths (18%) and three refractory ALL (14%). Median time to response was 21 days. With G-CSF, the median duration of absolute neutropenia was 10.5 days. Flexible postremission therapy was very well tolerated, causing no major toxicity. With a median follow-up of 2.6 years, 3 patients remain alive in first CR (23%), 2 of whom at 21.3 months and 39.6 months, respectively. Median survival of responders was 12 months compared to only 1.2 months for nonresponders (p < 0.001). This moderate-dose idarubicin-containing and G-CSF-supported regimen was associated with a high early remission rate in elderly ALL. Postremission therapy results were modest, though not appreciably different from the general experience in this patient population. Because further escalation of drug intensity appears unjustified, attempts to document and reverse drug resistance patterns and restore a dysregulated apoptosis must be considered.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in patients over 59 years of age. Experience in a single center over a 10-year period

We report data of 29 consecutive patients aged 60 years or older with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated at a single center between 1983 and 1992. Immunophenotyping was performed in 26 patients. According to the immunological classification used at the time of diagnosis, 14 had common-ALL, two had T-ALL, six had null-ALL, three had myeloid antigen-positive ALL with both lymphoid and myeloid markers, and one had B-ALL. One patient died before therapy could be instituted. Twenty-four patients received intensive induction chemotherapy. Nine of these patients died during the first 8 weeks, eight due to infections and one due to liver failure after asparaginase. In 14 of the remaining patients treated intensively, scheduled treatment was discontinued prematurely due to treatment-related toxicity and was replaced by milder chemotherapy. Four patients aged 75-77 years were treated with vincristine and prednisone. Only one patient who completed a whole study protocol survived more than 5 years. Twelve of the 28 patients treated with chemotherapy achieved complete remissions. The median survival was 5 months (range 1-103+). Median survival in patients with CR was 9.0 months. Actuarial survival is 3%. Our data demonstrate a poor prognosis in ALL patients over 59 years of age. The reasons were a high mortality during intensive induction therapy due to toxicity of treatment and a short remission duration.

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in the elderly

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is rare in adults over the age of 60 years, with an incidence of 1 per 100,000 per year. We review the current (sparse) literature and our Regional experience of 62 consecutive cases of ALL in this age group collected over a ten year period. The patterns of cytogenetic abnormalities and immunophenotypes differs from those seen in ALL in childhood and young adults, but are similar to those reported in previous studies. B-ALL was found at twice the rate observed in younger adults (9/51 versus 6/99) and T-ALL was rare (2/51). In our patients we had few cytogenetic results but in the literature up to 50% of patients have been found to be Philadelphia positive, supporting the hypothesis that ALL in this group is often a stem cell disorder. In our patients treatment results were disappointing, with only 30% of those given 'curative' treatment achieving a complete remission, and a relapse rate of 92%, mirroring other published series. The overall four year survival was 4%. We conclude that ALL in the elderly is a rare condition with an extremely poor prognosis. Aggressive treatment may prolong life but it seldom cures.

Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) in elderly patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical and biologic characteristics, response to therapy and outcome of adult patients with ALL above and below the age of 55.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of clinical and laboratory data.

SETTING

University affiliated Cancer Center and Veteran's Hospital.

PATIENTS

Thirty-three newly diagnosed, consecutive, adults with ALL seen over a nine-year period.

RESULTS

while no differences were demonstrated in the distribution of recognized prognostic indicators (such as cytogenetic abnormalities or immunophenotype), individuals over the age of 55 had significantly lower remission rates and shorter survivals.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of elderly patients with ALL is very poor. This is primarily related to an increase in the number of early deaths during induction, as well as a higher prevalence of disease refractory to standard chemotherapy programmes. There is a need for new treatment protocols designed for the elderly ALL patient, as well as a better understanding of the unique biological characteristics of the disease in this age group.