Long-term therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of recombinant interferon-alpha 2a in polycythaemia vera

Cytoreductive therapy in younger adults with polycythemia vera: a meta-analysis of safety and outcomes

ABSTRACT

Cytoreductive therapy is not routinely recommended for younger patients with polycythemia vera (PV) due to concern that treatment toxicity may outweigh therapeutic benefits. However, no systematic data support this approach. To support objective risk/benefit assessment of cytoreductive drugs in patients with PV aged <60 years (PV<60), this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate toxicity and disease-related complications in PV<60 treated with interferon alfa (rIFN-α) or hydroxyurea (HU). A search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase identified 693 unique studies with relevant keywords, of which 14 met inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis. The weighted average age of patients treated with rIFN-α was 48 years (n = 744 patients; 12 studies) and for HU was 56 years (n = 1397; 8 studies). The weighted average duration of treatment for either drug was 4.5 years. Using a Bayesian hierarchical model, the pooled annual rate of discontinuation due to toxicity was 5.2% for patients receiving rIFN-α (n = 587; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-8.2) and 3.6% for HU (n = 1097; CI, 1-6.2). The average complete hematologic response for rIFN-α and HU was 62% and 52%, respectively. Patients experienced thrombotic events at a pooled annual rate of 0.79% and 1.26%; secondary myelofibrosis at 1.06% and 1.62%; acute myeloid leukemia at 0.14% and 0.26%; and death at 0.87% and 2.65%, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were reported. With acceptable rates of nonfatal toxicity, cytoreductive treatment, particularly with disease-modifying rIFN-α, may benefit PV<60. Future randomized trials prioritizing inclusion of PV<60 are needed to establish a long-term benefit of early cytoreductive treatment in these patients.

Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b in Patients With Polycythemia Vera and Essential Thrombocythemia in the Real World

Several clinical trials have shown promising efficacy of pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) in the first- and second-line polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). However, the efficacy and safety of Peg-IFN in the real world have rarely been reported. Hence, we conducted a prospective, single-center, single-arm, open exploratory study, which aimed to explore the hematologic response, molecular response, safety, and tolerability of patients with PV and ET treated with Peg-IFN in the real world. This study included newly diagnosed or previously treated patients with PV and ET, aged 18 years or older, admitted to the Department of Hematology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from November 2017 to October 2019. The results revealed that complete hematological response (CHR) was achieved in 66.7% of patients with PV and 76.2% of patients with ET, and the molecular response was obtained in 38.5% of patients with PV and 50% of patients with ET after 48 weeks of Peg-IFN treatment. Peg-IFN is safe, effective and well tolerated in most patients. In the entire cohort, 4 patients (9.1%) discontinued treatment due to drug-related toxicity. In conclusion, Peg-IFN is a promising strategy in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), and Peg-IFN alone or in combination with other drugs should be further explored to reduce treatment-related toxicity and improve tolerability.

Clinical outcomes of interferon therapy for polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Interferon therapy has been used in clinical practice for more than three decades to treat polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). However, there has been no systematic investigation of its expected outcomes and potential risks. We performed a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis to assess the clinical outcomes (hematological response, molecular response, vascular events, hematological transformation, and adverse events) after interferon therapy for patients with PV and ET. A systematic search identified 37 reports, including data from 1794 patients that were published before March 2021. The pooled overall hematological response (OHR) rate was 86%, with better OHR rates observed in studies using long-acting interferon (p < 0.001) and studies with younger patients (p = 0.038). The pooled overall molecular response rate was 48%, and inter-study heterogeneity was also related to patient age (p = 0.009). The overall incidence was 0.42/100 person-years for thrombosis, 0.01/100 person-years for hemorrhage, 0.21/100 person-years for myelofibrotic transformation, and 0.08/100 person-years for leukemic transformation. Compared with hydroxyurea, interferon produced a non-inferior hematological response and a superior molecular response. In conclusion, interferon therapy provided high rates of hematological and molecular response for patients with PV and ET and was associated with a favorable prognosis.

Interferon alpha therapy in essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera-a systematic review and meta-analysis

Data on the efficacy and safety of interferon (IFN)-α for the treatment of essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) are inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis and searched MEDLINE and EMBASE via Ovid, Scopus, COCHRANE registry of clinical trials, and Web of Science from inception through 03/2019 for studies of pegylated IFN (peg-IFN) and non-pegylated IFN (non-peg-IFN) in PV and ET patients. Random-effects models were used to pool response rates for the primary outcome of overall response rate (ORR) defined as a composite of complete response, partial response, complete hematologic response (CHR) and partial hematologic response. Peg-IFN and non-peg-IFN were compared by meta-regression analyses. In total, 44 studies with 1359 patients (730 ET, 629 PV) were included. ORR were 80.6% (95% confidence interval: 76.6-84.1%, CHR: 59.0% [51.5%-66.1%]) and 76.7% (67.4-84.0%; CHR: 48.5% [37.8-59.4%]) for ET and PV patients, respectively. In meta-regression analyses results did not differ significantly for non-peg-IFN vs. peg-IFN. Annualized rates of thromboembolic complications and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events were low at 1.2% and 8.8% for ET and 0.5% and 6.5% for PV patients, respectively. Both peg-IFN and non-peg-IFN can be effective and safe long-term treatments for ET and PV.

New Perspectives on Polycythemia Vera: From Diagnosis to Therapy

Polycythemia vera (PV) is mainly characterized by elevated blood cell counts, thrombotic as well as hemorrhagic predisposition, a variety of symptoms, and cumulative risks of fibrotic progression and/or leukemic evolution over time. Major changes to its diagnostic criteria were made in the 2016 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, with both hemoglobin and hematocrit diagnostic thresholds lowered to 16.5 g/dL and 49% for men, and 16 g/dL and 48% for women, respectively. The main reason leading to these changes was represented by the recognition of a new entity, namely the so-called “masked PV”, as individuals suffering from this condition have a worse outcome, possibly owing to missed or delayed diagnoses and lower intensity of treatment. Thrombotic risk stratification is of crucial importance to evaluate patients’ prognosis at diagnosis. Currently, patients are stratified into a low-risk group, in the case of younger age (<60 years) and no previous thromboses, and a high-risk group, in the case of patients older than 60 years and/or with a previous thrombotic complication. Furthermore, even though they have not yet been formally included in a scoring system, generic cardiovascular risk factors, particularly hypertension, smoking, and leukocytosis, contribute to the thrombotic overall risk. In the absence of agents proven to modify its natural history and prevent progression, PV management has primarily been focused on minimizing the thrombotic risk, representing the main cause of morbidity and mortality. When cytoreduction is necessary, conventional therapies include hydroxyurea as a first-line treatment and ruxolitinib and interferon in resistant/intolerant cases. Each therapy, however, is burdened by specific drawbacks, underlying the need for improved strategies. Currently, the therapeutic landscape for PV is still expanding, and includes several molecules that are under investigation, like long-acting pegylated interferon alpha-2b, histone deacetylase inhibitors, and murine double minute 2 (MDM2) inhibitors.

Next Generation Sequencing in MPNs. Lessons from the Past and Prospects for Use as Predictors of Prognosis and Treatment Responses

The myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are acquired hematological stem cell neoplasms characterized by driver mutations in JAK2, CALR, or MPL. Additive mutations may appear in predominantly epigenetic regulator, RNA splicing and signaling pathway genes. These molecular mutations are a hallmark of diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic assessment in patients with MPNs. Over the past decade, next generation sequencing (NGS) has identified multiple somatic mutations in MPNs and has contributed substantially to our understanding of the disease pathogenesis highlighting the role of clonal evolution in disease progression. In addition, disease prognostication has expanded from encompassing only clinical decision making to include genomics in prognostic scoring systems. Taking into account the decreasing costs and increasing speed and availability of high throughput technologies, the integration of NGS into a diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic pipeline is within reach. In this review, these aspects will be discussed highlighting their role regarding disease outcome and treatment modalities in patients with MPNs.

RNA Fibers as Optimized Nanoscaffolds for siRNA Coordination and Reduced Immunological Recognition

RNA is a versatile biomaterial that can be used to engineer nanoassemblies for personalized treatment of various diseases. Despite promising advancements, the design of RNA nanoassemblies with minimal recognition by the immune system remains a major challenge. Here, an approach is reported to engineer RNA fibrous structures to operate as a customizable platform for efficient coordination of siRNAs and for maintaining low immunostimulation. Functional RNA fibers are studied in silico and their formation is confirmed by various experimental techniques and visualized by atomic force microscopy (AFM). It is demonstrated that the RNA fibers offer multiple advantages among which are: i) programmability and modular design that allow for simultaneous controlled delivery of multiple siRNAs and fluorophores, ii) reduced immunostimulation when compared to other programmable RNA nanoassemblies, and iii) simple production protocol for endotoxin-free fibers with the option of their cotranscriptional assembly. Furthermore, it is shown that functional RNA fibers can be efficiently delivered with various organic and inorganic carriers while retaining their structural integrity in cells. Specific gene silencing triggered by RNA fibers is assessed in human breast cancer and melanoma cell lines, with the confirmed ability of functional fibers to selectively target single nucleotide mutations.

Second line therapies in polycythemia vera: What is the optimal strategy after hydroxyurea failure?

Cytoreductive therapies have traditionally been the standard treatment for older patients with polycythemia vera (PV) or those with a history of prior thrombosis. Hydroxyurea (HU) is the most frequently used cytoreductive agent in PV. However, approximately 24% of patients treated with HU will eventually develop resistance or intolerance and patients who fail HU have an increased risk of death, transformation to myelofibrosis or acute myeloid leukemia. Interferon-alpha has been used in younger PV patients and is capable of inducing a complete hematologic response and significant reductions, or even eradication, of JAK2 V617F mutation allele burdens in a small but notable subset of PV patients. The potential toxicities of interferon-alpha must be weighed against the disease control benefit in a case-by-case fashion. Recently JAK2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib, demonstrated significant improvement in controlling the hematocrit and splenomegaly versus best available therapy in patients with PV who failed or are intolerant to HU and currently is FDA-approved in this setting. In this review, we will discuss novel emerging therapies for PV with a special focus on the currently available and upcoming treatment options for patients who fail HU.

Where to Turn for Second-Line Cytoreduction After Hydroxyurea in Polycythemia Vera?

The goals of therapy in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) are to improve disease-related symptoms, prevent the incidence or recurrence of thrombosis, and possibly delay or prevent the transformation into myelofibrosis or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Cytoreductive therapies have been used in older patients and those with a history of thrombosis to achieve these goals. Hydroxyurea (HU) remains the first-line cytoreductive choice; however, up to one in four patients treated with HU over time will develop resistance or intolerance to HU. More importantly, patients who fail HU have a 5.6-fold increase in mortality and a 6.8-fold increase risk of transformation to myelofibrosis or AML; therefore, alternative therapies are needed for these patients. Interferon-α has been used in PV and has shown significant activity in achieving hematologic responses and decreasing JAK2 V617F mutation allele burden. JAK inhibition has also been investigated and recently garnered regulatory approval for this indication. In this review, we will discuss the current treatment options that are available for patients after HU and the novel therapies that are currently under investigation.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The outcomes of PV patients who fail or who are intolerant of hydroxyurea are poor. Although pegylated interferon can be considered in younger patients, currently, ruxolitinib is the only U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved agent in this setting, representing a viable option, leading to hematocrit control and a reduction in spleen size and constitutional symptoms. Although a small number of patients will achieve a molecular response with continuous treatment, the implications of such response on the clinical outcomes are still unknown. Patients whose disease is not adequately controlled with ruxolitinib, or who lose their response, can be treated with low-dose busulfan or pipobroman; however, they should be encouraged to participate in trials with novel therapies.

Interferon-alpha therapy in bcr-abl-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms

Interferon (IFN) was the first cytokine discovered 50 years ago, with a wide range of biological properties, including immunomodulatory, proapoptotic and antiangiogenic activities, that rapidly raised interest in its therapeutic use in malignancies. IFN-receptor characterization was also pivotal in the discovery of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Among the large IFN family, mainly one of the type I IFN, IFN-alpha2, is used in therapy. Many clinical trials have shown remarkable efficacy of IFN-alpha in bcr-abl-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), especially polycythemia vera (PV), and essential thrombocythemia (ET). IFN-alpha induces about 80% of hematological responses in those diseases and is able to reduce splenomegaly, as well as relieve pruritus and other constitutional symptoms. Yet its use was limited by toxicity, leading to early treatment discontinuation in about 20% of the patients. However, its lack of leukemogenic potential and its possible use during pregnancy have already made IFN-alpha the drug of choice for younger MPN patients. In addition, several studies have shown a probably selective effect of IFN-alpha on PV and ET clones, as shown by cytogenetic remissions, reversions to polyclonal hematopoiesis, and more recently by induction of JAK2V617F complete molecular remissions in PV which may widen the indications of IFN-alpha in JAK2-mutated MPN.

A review of the therapeutic agents used in the management of polycythaemia vera

The acquired clonal disorder Polycythaemia Vera leads to increased erythropoiesis, myelopoiesis and megakaryopoeisis. These anomalies result in an increased incidence of thromboembolic events, transformation to acute leukaemia and myelofibrosis. Treatments which aim to reduce the event rate may increase anaemia but may also affect the rate of complications. This paper reviews the evidence for the treatments which have been used in the management of the disorders over a 50 plus year period. Assessment of this evidence and its limitations form the basis for the current suggested management plans.

Minimal molecular response in polycythemia vera patients treated with imatinib or interferon alpha

Imatinib and recombinant interferon alpha (rIFNalpha) can induce remission in polycythemia vera (PV) patients, but gauging the depth of responses has not been possible due to lack of a specific disease marker. We found that patients undergoing imatinib (n = 14) or rIFNalpha (n = 7) therapy remained strongly positive for V617F JAK2, although there was a significant reduction in the median percentage of mutant alleles that correlated with hematologic response (P = .001). Furthermore, individuals who achieved complete hematologic remission had lower levels of V617F than those who did not (P = .001). Of 9 imatinib-treated cases for whom pretreatment samples were available, 7 with no or partial hematologic responses showed a marginal increase (median, 1.2-fold; range, 1.0-1.5) in the percentage of V617F alleles on treatment, whereas the 2 patients who achieved complete hematologic remission showed a 2- to 3-fold reduction. Our data indicate that, although PV patients may benefit from imatinib or rIFNalpha, molecular responses are relatively modest.

Polycythemia vera: a comprehensive review and clinical recommendations

More than a century has elapsed since the appearance of the modern descriptions of polycythemia vera (PV). During this time, much has been learned regarding disease pathogenesis and PV-associated molecular aberrations. New information has allowed amendments to traditional diagnostic criteria. Phlebotomy remains the cornerstone treatment of PV, whereas myelosuppressive agents may augment the benefit of using phlebotomy for thrombosis prevention in high-risk patients. Excessive aspirin use is contraindicated in PV, although the use of lower-dose aspirin has been shown to be safe and effective in alleviating microvascular symptoms including erythromelalgia and headaches. Recent studies have shown the utility of selective serotonin receptor antagonists for treating PV-associated pruritus. Nevertheless, many questions remain unanswered. What is the specific genetic mutation or altered molecular pathway that is causally related to the disease? In the absence of a specific molecular marker, how is a working diagnosis of PV made? What evidence supports current practice in the management of PV? This article summarizes both old and new information on PV; proposes a modern diagnostic algorithm to formulate a working diagnosis; and provides recommendations for patient management, relying whenever possible on an evidence-based approach.