1
|
Li C, Hu S, Lei Q, Wang C, Yang Y, Yang Y, Sun X. Establishment and optimization of mRNA in situ hybridization system in turnip ( Brassica rapa var . rapa). PLANT METHODS 2019; 15:115. [PMID: 31636692 PMCID: PMC6794860 DOI: 10.1186/s13007-019-0499-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In situ hybridization (ISH) is a general molecular biological technique used to determine the spatiotemporal expression of genes in many species. In the past few years, numerous ISH protocols have been established in many species. Turnip (Brassica rapa var. rapa) is an important crop in the world, especially in the Plateau area of China, and is a traditional Tibetan medicine. However, ISH protocol in turnip has not been established. RESULTS We explored and established an optimal workflow for mRNA ISH system for turnip which has been evaluated using BrrCLV3 and BrrWUSa. The optimal methods include: (1) fixation method, (2) protease K pretreatment time, (3) probe length and concentration, (4) washing temperature. We also provide advice on weakening background and improving the efficiency of RNA transcription in vitro. The expression of the BrrCLV3 gene in turnip was detected by the optimized system, and the applicability of the system was confirmed by using BrrWUSa. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we established and optimized the mRNA ISH system for turnip. We explored and found that (1) FAA fixative was the optimized fixation method, (2) 30 min was the optimized protease K pretreatment time, (3) 100 bp, 100 ng/ml probe had good hybridization signal, (4) the optimized washing temperature was 52 °C. It provides a powerful method to locate mRNA in the tissue, which can study the expression and function of turnip's genes. As such, it has considerable advantages in terms of time and cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Li
- Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201 China
- Plant Germplasm and Genomics Center, The Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201 China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Simin Hu
- Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201 China
- Plant Germplasm and Genomics Center, The Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201 China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Qidong Lei
- Faculty of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan China
| | - Chongde Wang
- College of Plant Protection, Yunnan Agriculture University, Kunming, 650201 China
| | - Yunqiang Yang
- Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201 China
- Plant Germplasm and Genomics Center, The Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201 China
| | - Yongping Yang
- Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201 China
- Plant Germplasm and Genomics Center, The Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201 China
| | - Xudong Sun
- Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201 China
- Plant Germplasm and Genomics Center, The Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201 China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Han SJ, Jeong J, Demayo FJ, Xu J, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, O'Malley BW. Dynamic cell type specificity of SRC-1 coactivator in modulating uterine progesterone receptor function in mice. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:8150-65. [PMID: 16135805 PMCID: PMC1234322 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.25.18.8150-8165.2005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2005] [Revised: 04/27/2005] [Accepted: 06/29/2005] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Regulation of gene transcription by the progesterone receptor (PR) in cooperation with coactivator/corepressor complexes coordinates crucial processes in female reproduction. To investigate functional relationships between PR and steroid receptor coactivators (SRCs) in distinct cell types of uterine tissue during gene transcription, we generated a new transgenic mouse model utilizing a Progesterone Receptor Activity Indicator (PRAI) system that could monitor PR activity in vivo. The PRAI system consists of a modified PR bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clone in which the DNA binding domain of the PR was replaced with the yeast Gal4 DNA binding domain. A humanized green fluorescent protein (hrGFP) reporter controlled by the Upstream Activating Sequences for the Gal4 gene (UAS(G)) was inserted in tandem with the modified PR gene. Expression of hrGFP in the uterus demonstrated that the PRAI animal model faithfully replicated PR signaling under various endocrine states. Bigenic PRAI-SRC-1(-/-) mice revealed that SRC-1 modulates PR activity in the uterus in a cell-specific fashion and is involved in PR gene activation in stroma and myometrium of the uterus in response to estrogen and progesterone. In contrast, SRC-1 was involved in the down-regulation of PR target gene expression in the luminal and glandular epithelial compartments of the uterus after chronic progesterone treatment. Finally, we dissected the means by which SRC-1 dynamically regulates PR activity in each uterine cell compartment and demonstrated that it involves the differential ability of SRC-1 to modulate expression levels of distinct coactivators, corepressors, and PR in a cell-specific fashion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Jun Han
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Advances in cell and molecular biology have engendered a wide range of techniques that can be used to study the molecular events that underlie the cause of disease, thus producing a new field of study called "molecular pathology." These techniques can be either slide-based or non-slide-based (solution-based). The slide-based techniques include immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, and in situ polymerase chain reaction; pathologists play a unique role in the administration of these techniques because of their ability to interpret the end product (i.e., the slide). In this manuscript, we briefly discussed the use and impact of these slide-based techniques within all phases of drug development in the pharmaceutical industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N A Gillett
- Sierra Biomedical, Inc., Sparks, Nevada 89431, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wilson KH, Schambra UB, Smith MS, Page SO, Richardson CD, Fremeau RT, Schwinn DA. In situ hybridization: identification of rare mRNAs in human tissues. BRAIN RESEARCH. BRAIN RESEARCH PROTOCOLS 1997; 1:175-85. [PMID: 9385082 DOI: 10.1016/s1385-299x(96)00028-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
In situ hybridization is used for detection of RNA expression when conservation of tissue architecture is important. Most in situ hybridization protocols are written for tissues from animals (i.e., rat) which can be harvested and preserved rapidly. In contrast, human tissue is more difficult to obtain, hence in situ hybridization experiments must frequently be performed with less than optimal tissue preservation. This procedure details hybridization of a radiolabeled single-stranded RNA probe (riboprobe) to complementary sequences of cellular RNA in human tissue sections. This method enables detection of rare mRNA species in specific cell types of human tissue, offering distinct advantages over other in situ methods due to increased sensitivity. In particular, we have found that UV cross-linking and ribonuclease treatment protocols need to be altered for human tissues to ensure successful results, making this protocol unique to those previously described. In situ hybridization experiments can be performed using either DNA or RNA probes. RNA probes are advantageous since they form stable hybrids, are single-stranded, have little or no reannealing during hybridization, and can be synthesized to high specific activity. RNA probes can be readily created utilizing SP6, T3, or T7 promoters in both sense and antisense orientations to provide non-specific (control) and specific probes. Disadvantages of RNA riboprobes include a tendency for RNA to stick non-selectively more than DNA, and degradation by RNase (hence strict adherence to RNase-free precautions is mandatory during most of the protocol). The following protocol includes: (1) preparation of human tissues (tissue fixation and sectioning are highlighted as critical for probe penetration, preservation of tissue architecture, retention of tissue RNA, and overall success); (2) generation of radiolabeled riboprobes (total incorporation of radionucleotide is important to increase sensitivity; 35S was chosen as a compromise between excellent sensitivity, cellular resolution, and required exposure times (compared with 32P or 3H); non-isotopic methods have not been tested in a side-by-side comparison with 35S in human tissues by us, but theoretically might offer faster exposure times while maintaining high resolution); (3) hybridization conditions (stringency, temperature, washes, tissue dehydration); and (4) sample visualization (application of photographic emulsion, developing, fixing, staining, and counterstaining of individual slides).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K H Wilson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Berndt A, Kosmehl H, Celeda D, Katenkamp D. Reduced formamide content and hybridization temperature results in increased non-radioactive mRNA in situ hybridization signals. Acta Histochem 1996; 98:79-87. [PMID: 9054192 DOI: 10.1016/s0065-1281(96)80053-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
To define conditions for highly sensitive non-radioactive mRNA in situ hybridization on cryostat sections the influence of decreased formamide content and hybridization temperature was studied. The examination was performed on fibromatosis nodules of palmar fibromatosis visualizing the beta actin mRNA of myofibroblasts. The results show that a decrease in formamide content and hybridization temperature is able to enhance the sensitivity of mRNA detection applicating digoxigenin labelled DNA oligodeoxynucleotide. The best hybridization signal could be obtained under formamide-free conditions. In conclusion, a simplified sensitive formamide-free mRNA in situ hybridization protocol using oligonucleotide probes on human tissue cryostat sections is presented. The negative formamide effect is seen as a result of the chemical interaction of formamide with nucleic acid strands. An omission of formamide is suggested if the target as well as the probe are single stranded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Berndt
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|