Immunohistochemical localization of fibroblast growth factor-1 (FGF-1) and FGF-2 in cultured human ameloblastoma epithelial cells and ameloblastoma tissues

Prognostic importance of FGF2 and FGFR1 expression for patients affected by ameloblastoma

BACKGROUND

Fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) and FGF receptor 1 (FGFR1) have been investigated in different human neoplasms and were shown to play important roles in the pathogenesis of these diseases; however, very few are known regarding their prognostic importance in the context of ameloblastoma. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether the expression of FGF2 and FGFR1 is associated with ameloblastoma clinical behavior.

METHODS

Fifty-eight cases of ameloblastoma arranged in tissue microarray were submitted to immunohistochemistry against FGF2 and FGFR1. Clinicopathological parameters regarding sex, age, tumor size, duration and location, treatment, recurrences, radiographic features, cortical disruptions, and follow-up data were obtained from patients' medical records and correlated with the molecules expression. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the prognostic potential of the biomarkers.

RESULTS

Forty-four cases (75.9%) exhibited cytoplasmic positivity for FGF2 in central and peripheral epithelial cells, 46 of 58 (79.3%) showed FGFR1 cytoplasmic positivity predominantly in the columnar peripheral cells, and 43 cases (74.1%) were positive for both. Expression of FGF2 and FGF2 + FGFR1 was associated with tumor recurrences (P = .05). However, univariate and multivariate analyses did not demonstrate a significant influence of FGF2, FGFR1, or FGF2 + FGFR1 in the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate (P = .27, P = .33, and P = .25, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Cytoplasmic expression of FGF2 and FGF2 + FGFR1 is associated with ameloblastoma recurrence, but FGF2 and FGFR1 are not determinants of a lower DFS.

Molecular and genetic aspects in the etiopathogenesis of ameloblastoma: An update

Ameloblastoma is the second most common benign epithelial odontogenic tumor and though it is of a benign nature, it is locally invasive, has a high recurrence rate and could potentially become malignant. Many theories have been proposed to explain the pathogenesis of ameloblastoma. Proper understanding of the pathogenic mechanism involved in ameloblastoma and its proliferation aids in constituting proper treatment of choice at an early stage, preventing morbidity associated with extensive therapy. An attempt has been made to discuss the current concepts related to molecular and genetic changes that occur in ameloblastoma as these could affect treatment plan and prognosis.

Differential expression of glypican-1 in ameloblastoma variants

Although benign, ameloblastomas are locally invasive and destructive tumors of the jawbones. The glypicans comprise a family of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteoglycans that, by virtue of their cell-surface localization and heparin sulfate chain composition, might regulate the response of cells to numerous heparin-binding growth factors, cell adhesion molecules, and extracellular matrix components. The expression of glypican-1 is differentially altered among different types of malignancies, suggesting a possible role in the tumorigenesis and biological behavior of these neoplasms. The aim of this study was to determine the expression of glypican-1 and then hypothesize the possible role that this protein may play in the biological behavior of ameloblastomas. We assessed the presence of glypican-1 by immunohistochemical staining analyses in a series of 80 cases of different types of ameloblastomas. Desmoplastic ameloblastomas exhibited the highest expression of glypican-1 (100%), followed by the peripheral (66%), solid/multicystic (51.2%), and unicystic (47.2%) types, showing statistically significant differences among them (P<0.001). Differences detected in glypican-1 expression among different subtypes of ameloblastomas, could be suggesting a possible association with their different biological behavior.

Fibroblast growth factors 7 and 10 are involved in ameloblastoma proliferation via the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway

Ameloblastoma is an epithelial benign tumor of the odontogenic apparatus and its growth mechanisms are not well understood. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 3, FGF7 and FGF10, which are expressed by the neural crest-derived ectomesenchymal cells, induce the proliferation of odontogenic epithelial cells during tooth development. Therefore, we examined the expression and function of these FGFs in ameloblastoma. We examined 32 cases of ameloblastoma as well as AM-1 cells (an ameloblastoma cell line) and studied the expression of FGF3, FGF7, FGF10 and their specific receptors, namely, FGF receptor (FGFR) 1 and FGFR2. Proliferation, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling and PI3K signaling were examined in AM-1 cells after the addition of FGF7, FGF10 and these neutralizing antibodies. The expression of FGF7, FGF10, FGFR1 and FGFR2 was detected in ameloblastoma cells and AM-1 cells, while that of FGF3 was not. FGF7 and FGF10 stimulated AM-1 cell proliferation and phosphorylation of p44/42 MAPK. However, Akt was not phosphorylated. Blocking the p44/42 MAPK pathway by using a specific mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitor (U0126) completely neutralized the effects of FGF7 and FGF10 on AM-1 cell proliferation. However, Anti FGF7 and FGF10 neutralizing antibodies did not decrease cell proliferation and MAPK phosphorylation of AM-1 cells. These results suggested that FGF7 and FGF10 are involved in the proliferation of ameloblastoma cells through the MAPK pathway.

Molecular markers of tumor invasiveness in ameloblastoma: An update

The aim of the present article was to review the current new knowledge on the molecular markers of tumor invasion in ameloblastoma. In this review, tumor molecular markers were identified and allocated to the following six groups according to their functions: (I) Markers involved in extracellular matrix degradation, (II) Molecular markers involved in cell adhesion lost, (III) Molecular markers involved in bone remodeling, (IV) Cytokines involved in angiogenesis, (V) Molecular markers related with the function of tumor stromal cells on the invasion of ameloblastoma, and (VI) Molecular markers involved in cell proliferation related with invasion.

In general, the location of markers within the tumor and not their quantitative assessments as such is emphasized. Data showed that the correlation among molecular markers of invasive relevance is still not quite clear. Results on markers of tumor invasion and metastatic potential appeared to be too premature for a statement regarding the instinct invasive nature of ameloblastoma. The unraveling of specific new details concerning these mechanisms, whereby the expression and relationships among the molecules are mediated, may provide an opportunity to afford efficient prevention and develop new treatment therapies.

Molecular pathology of odontogenic tumors

Odontogenic tumors are lesions derived from the elements of the tooth-forming apparatus and are found exclusively within the jawbones. This review represents a contemporary outline of our current understanding of the molecular and genetic alterations associated with the development and progression of odontogenic tumors, including oncogenes, tumor-suppressor genes, oncoviruses, growth factors, telomerase, cell cycle regulators, apoptosis-related factors, regulators of tooth development, hard tissue-related proteins, cell adhesion molecules, matrix-degrading proteinases, angiogenic factors, and osteolytic cytokines. It is hoped that better understanding of related molecular mechanisms will help to predict the course of odontogenic tumors and lead to the development of new therapeutic concepts for their management.

Immunohistochemical detection of hepatocyte growth factor, transforming growth factor-β and their receptors in epithelial odontogenic tumors

BACKGROUND

Tumors derived from odontogenic epithelium exhibit considerable variation and are classified into several benign and malignant entities. To clarify the role of growth factors in oncogenesis, cytodifferentiation and progression of epithelial odontogenic tumors, expression of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) and their receptors were analyzed in these tumors as well as in tooth germs.

METHODS

Specimens of five tooth germs, 34 ameloblastomas, three calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumors (CEOTs), two clear cell odontogenic tumors (CCOTs), five adenomatoid odontogenic tumors (AOTs), six calcifying odontogenic cysts (COCs) and six malignant ameloblastomas were examined immunohistochemically with the use of antibodies against HGF, TGF-beta and their receptors.

RESULTS

In tooth germs and epithelial odontogenic tumors, immunoreactivity for HGF and TGF-beta was detected in both epithelial and mesenchymal cells, while expression of their receptors was found only in epithelial cells. In tooth germs and main types of ameloblastomas, HGF and TGF-beta reactivity was marked in epithelial cells near the basement membrane, and their receptors were diffusely positive in most epithelial cells. In subtypes of ameloblastomas, reduced expression of HGF, c-Met and TGF-beta and increased reactivity for TGF-beta receptors were detected in keratinizing cells in acanthomatous ameloblastomas, and granular cells in granular cell ameloblastomas demonstrated little or no expression of HGF, TGF-beta or their receptors. As compared with main types of ameloblastomas, basal cell ameloblastomas showed high HGF reactivity, and desmoplastic ameloblastomas exhibited elevated reactivity for TGF-beta and its receptors. Neoplastic cells in CEOTs, AOTs and COCs showed reactivity for HGF, TGF-beta and their receptors. Elevated HGF and TGF-beta reactivity was found in pseudoglandular cells in AOTs, and high expression of their receptors was noted in ghost cells in COCs. Metastasizing ameloblastomas showed similar expression patterns of HGF, TGF-beta and their receptors to those of benign ameloblastomas, while CCOTs and ameloblastic carcinomas had increased HGF expression and low reactivity for TGF-beta and its receptors as compared with benign ameloblastomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunohistochemical localization of HGF, TGF-beta and their receptors in tooth germs and epithelial odontogenic tumors supports the hypothesis that HGF and TGF-beta act on epithelial cells via paracrine and autocrine mechanisms. Altered expression of the agents in these epithelial odontogenic tumors, especially subtypes of ameloblastomas, AOTs and COCs, suggests that HGF and TGF-beta signaling might affect differentiation of neoplastic odontogenic epithelial cells. Activated HGF/c-Met pathway and reduced TGF-beta signaling in CCOTs and ameloblastic carcinomas may be associated with the malignant potential of these epithelial odontogenic tumors.

Odontogenic cysts, odontogenic tumors, fibroosseous, and giant cell lesions of the jaws

Odontogenic cysts that can be problematic because of recurrence and/or aggressive growth include odontogenic keratocyst (OKC), calcifying odontogenic cyst, and the recently described glandular odontogenic cyst. The OKC has significant growth capacity and recurrence potential and is occasionally indicative of the nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome. There is also an orthokeratinized variant, the orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst, which is less aggressive and is not syndrome associated. Ghost cell keratinization, which typifies the calcifying odontogenic cyst, can be seen in solid lesions that have now been designated odontogenic ghost cell tumor. The glandular odontogenic cyst contains mucous cells and ductlike structures that may mimic central mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Several odontogenic tumors may provide diagnostic challenges, particularly the cystic ameloblastoma. Identification of this frequently underdiagnosed cystic tumor often comes after one or more recurrences and a destructive course. Other difficult lesions include malignant ameloblastomas, calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor, squamous odontogenic tumor, and clear-cell odontogenic tumor. Histologic identification of myxofibrous lesions of the jaws (odontogenic myxoma, odontogenic fibroma, desmoplastic fibroma) is necessary to avoid the diagnostic pitfall of overdiagnosis of similar-appearing follicular sacs and dental pulps. Fibroosseous lesions of the jaws show considerable microscopic overlap and include fibrous dysplasia, ossifying fibroma, periapical cementoosseous dysplasia, and low-grade chronic osteomyelitis. The term fibrous dysplasia is probably overused in general practice and should be reserved for the rare lesion that presents as a large, expansile, diffuse opacity of children and young adults. The need to use clinicopathologic correlation in assessing these lesions is of particular importance. Central giant cell granuloma is a relatively common jaw lesion of young adults that has an unpredictable behavior. Microscopic diagnosis is relatively straightforward; however, this lesion continues to be somewhat controversial because of its disputed classification (reactive versus neoplastic) and because of its management (surgical versus. medical). Its relationship to giant cell tumor of long bone remains undetermined.

Association between vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and tumor angiogenesis in ameloblastomas

BACKGROUND

Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a major angiogenic factor, and microvessel density (MVD), assessed by the use of anti-CD34 antibody, were immunohistochemically examined in benign and malignant ameloblastomas, as well as tooth germs, to clarify the possible role of angiogenesis in epithelial odontogenic tumors.

METHODS

Specimens of 5 tooth germs, 35 benign ameloblastomas and 5 malignant ameloblastomas were examined by immunohistochemistry using anti-VEGF and CD34 monoclonal antibodies.

RESULTS

Immunoreactivity for VEGF was detected in both normal and neoplastic odontogenic epithelial cells, and weakly in microvessels near odontogenic epithelial cells, suggesting that this angiogenic factor acts on endothelial cells via a paracrine mechanism in odontogenic tissues. Both benign and malignant ameloblastomas showed elevated VEGF expression as compared to tooth germs. VEGF expression was low in keratinizing cells in acanthomatous ameloblastomas and granular cells in granular cell ameloblastomas, and acanthomatous ameloblastomas showed the lowest VEGF reactivity among the subtypes of ameloblastomas. MVD in both benign and malignant ameloblastomas was higher than that in tooth germs, indicating increased demands for blood in the neoplastic tissues. CD34-positive microvessels in follicular ameloblastomas were numerous and small, whereas those in plexiform ameloblastomas were scattered and dilated. MVD tended to depend on VEGF expression levels in both benign and malignant ameloblastomas.

CONCLUSIONS

VEGF was considered to be an important mediator of angiogenesis in these epithelial odontogenic tumors, and up-regulation of VEGF might be associated with neoplastic or malignant changes of odontogenic epithelial cells.

Calretinin expression in ameloblastomas

AIMS

Calretinin is a 29-kDa calcium-binding protein which is expressed in the central and peripheral nervous systems as well as in many other normal and pathological human tissues. The objective of this study was to determine whether calretinin was expressed in the epithelium of ameloblastomas.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-seven cases of unicystic ameloblastoma and 31 cases of solid and multicystic ameloblastoma were studied. Five-micron sections were immunohistochemically stained using either antiserum 7696 from Swant, or antiserum 18-0211 from Zymed with a standard ABC method. The results were identical with the two antisera. Positive staining was seen in 22 cases (81.5%) of unicystic ameloblastomas. This generally consisted of diffuse, intense nuclear and cytoplasmic staining of several cell layers of the more superficial cells both in the characteristic and nondescript areas of the cyst linings. In the solid and multicystic ameloblastomas, staining occurred in 29 (93. 5%) of the cases. The staining was almost always restricted to the stellate reticulum-like epithelium, was generally intense and diffuse in distribution. Areas of squamous metaplasia stained particularly intensely as did the cells surrounding micro- and macro-cysts. In both groups of lesions, most of the cases that did not stain were intensely inflamed.

CONCLUSIONS

The biological significance of calretinin expression in ameloblastomas is not known and its use as a distinctive, specific immunohistochemical marker for ameloblastic tissues remains to be confirmed. However, the results of this study raise the possibility that calretinin may be an important diagnostic aid in the differential diagnosis of cystic and solid ameloblastic tumours.

Aberrant gene expression in epithelial cells of mixed odontogenic tumors

Comparative investigations of odontogenic cells in normally forming teeth and tumors may provide insights into the mechanisms of the differentiation process. The present study is devoted to late phenotypic markers of ameloblast and odontoblast cells, i.e., proteins involved in biomineralization. The in situ expression of amelogenins, keratins, collagens type III and IV, vimentin, fibronectin, osteonectin, and osteocalcin was performed on normal and tumor odontogenic human cells. The pattern of protein expression showed some similarities between ameloblasts and odontoblasts present in normally developing human teeth and cells present in neoplastic tissues of ameloblastic fibroma, ameloblastic fibro-odontomas, and complex odontomas. Amelogenins (for ameloblasts) and osteocalcin (for odontoblasts) were detected in cells with well-organized enamel and dentin, respectively. In contrast, "mixed" cells located in epithelial zones of mixed odontogenic tumors co-expressed amelogenins and osteocalcin, as shown by immunostaining. The presence of osteocalcin transcripts was also demonstrated by in situ hybridization in these cells. Keratins and vimentin were detected in the same epithelial zones. Tumor epithelial cells were associated with various amounts of polymorphic matrix (amelogenin- and osteocalcin-immunoreactive), depending on the types of mixed tumors. No osteocalcin labeling was found in epithelial tumors. This study confirms that the differentiation of normal and tumor odontogenic cells is accompanied by the expression of some common molecules. Furthermore, the gene products present in normal mesenchymal cells were also shown in odontogenic tumor epithelium. These data may be related to a tumor-specific overexpression of the corresponding genes transcribed at an undetectable level during normal development and/or to an epithelial-mesenchymal transition proposed to occur during normal root formation. A plausible explanation for the results is that the odontogenic tumor epithelial cells are recapitulating genetic programs expressed during normal odontogenesis, but the tumor cells demonstrate abnormal expression patterns for these genes.

Establishment of ameloblastoma cell line, AM-1

Ameloblastomas are slowly growing, locally invasive neoplasms with a potentially destructive behaviour. The molecular mechanisms that regulate the cell growth and invasion of ameloblastoma cells are unknown. Because ameloblastoma cells placed in culture have a very limited lifespan, the establishment of immortalized clones of ameloblastoma cells would aid its study. We produced an immortalized ameloblastoma cell line (AM-1) using human papillomavirus type-16. This cell line maintains epithelial cell morphology and expresses cytokeratins K8, K14, K18, K19. Furthermore, bcl-2 protein, which prevents apoptosis, is expressed. We investigated the behaviour of these cells on a collagen matrix in vitro. These cells grew in a monolayer over foci of collagen degradation and could invade the collagen gel at such sites. Since the behavior of cell line AM-1 mimics the behavior of ameloblastoma in vivo, it may be a valuable model for the study of these neoplasms.

Detection of apoptosis-related factors and apoptotic cells in ameloblastomas: analysis by immunohistochemistry and an in situ DNA nick end-labelling method

To clarify the possible role of apoptosis in odontogenic epithelium, apoptosis-related factors and apoptotic cells were examined by immunohistochemistry and an in situ DNA nick end-labelling method. Expression of bcl-2 protein was detected in both normal and neoplastic odontogenic epithelium, whereas expression of p53 protein was detected only in neoplastic but not in normal odontogenic epithelium. The prevalence of cases positive for Lewis(y) antigen in ameloblastomas was significantly lower than in enamel organs. Correlation between these factors and apoptotic cells presented by an in situ DNA nick end-labelling method was not clear. The number of apoptotic cells in ameloblastomas was significantly greater than in normal odontogenic epithelium, and apoptotic reactions in the granular cell type ameloblastoma tended to be more frequently detected than in other types of ameloblastomas. These results suggested that apoptotic cell death might play an important role in oncogenesis and/or tissue differentiation in odontogenic epithelium.