Impact of early or delayed cyclosporine on delayed graft function in renal transplant recipients: a randomized, multicenter study

Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation

This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.

Thymoglobulin versus Alemtuzumab versus Basiliximab Kidney Transplantation from Donors After Circulatory Death

Introduction

The Campath, Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) reduction, and Chronic allograft nephropathy (3C), a study comparing alemtuzumab versus basiliximab induction immunosuppression in kidney transplants, has found lower acute rejection rate with alemtuzumab but same graft survival. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effect of induction immunosuppression (thymoglobulin, alemtuzumab, basiliximab) on the outcome of kidneys of donors after circulatory death (DCD).

Methods

Data of the 274 DCD patients of the 3C obtained from the sponsor were compounded with the 140 DCD patients who received thymoglobulin in a single center with the same entry criteria as the 3C, giving 414 patients on 3 induction regimes.

Results

There were more male donors (P < 0.05) and human leukocyte antigen and DR mismatched patients in the thymoglobulin group (P < 0.001). Death-censored graft survival at 6 months was 98.6% in the thymoglobulin, 95.5% in the alemtuzumab (P = 0.08), and 95.7% in the basiliximab group (P = 0.09) and at 2 years 97.9% versus 94.8% (P = 0.13, hazard ratio [HR] 2.8, 95% CI 0.7–10.9) versus 94.3% (P = 0.06, HR 3.5, 95% CI 0.9–13.6), respectively.

The 2-year overall graft survival was 95% in the thymoglobulin versus 88% in the alemtuzumab (unadjusted P = 0.038, adjusted HR 2.4, 95% CI 0.99–5.9) and 91.4% in the basiliximab group (P = 0.21). The 2-year patient survival was numerically less in the alemtuzumab compared with the thymoglobulin group (91.8% vs. 97.1%, P = 0.052, HR 2.90, 95% CI 0.93–9.2). Acute rejection was 17% in the basiliximab, 4.3% in the thymoglobulin, and 6% in the alemtuzumab group (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

In DCD transplants, thymoglobulin induction may provide advantage over alemtuzumab in patient survival and the same advantage as alemtuzumab over basiliximab in terms of acute rejection. Differing maintenance immunosuppression may contribute to the difference found.

Induction with ATG in DCD kidney transplantation; efficacy and relation of dose and cell markers on delayed graft function and renal function

AIM

We aimed to analyse the efficacy of the Thymoglobulin dose used for induction in controlled DCD kidneys, and its initial impact on blood cell and CD3 count, as predictors of efficacy.

METHODS

140 DCD patients who received ATG induction, were analysed. Intended dose was 1.25 mg/kg/day over 5 days, rounded to nearest 25 mg and not exceeding 125 mg/dose. Outcomes included the total dose in relation with rejection, DGF, graft survival, eGFR. The cell count response to ATG was assessed as predictors of outcome.

RESULTS

Graft survival, was 96.2%, 92.4%, 85% at 1, 3 and 5 years. Rejection was 7% at 1 year and associated with eGFR at 3 (p = 0.003) and 5 years. ATG dose was not predictive of rejection but was associated with the day5 leucocyte and lymphocyte count (p < 0.001) and negatively with DGF (p = 0.05). In 31 patients day3 CD3 count was available and it was associated with rejection (p = 0.002), less DGF (p = 0.09), and 3 years eGFR (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Thymoglobulin provides excellent results in DCD kidneys that do not significantly differ with small dose variations. In higher doses it reduces DGF. Lymphocytes and CD3 count, may be useful surrogate markers of efficacy and outcome.

[Ischemia-reperfusion injury after kidney transplantation]

Ischemia-reperfusion injury is an inescapable phenomenon in kidney transplantation. It combines lesional processes of biochemical origin associated with oxydative stress and of immunological origin in connection with the recruitment and activation of innate immunity cells. Histological lesions associate acute tubular necrosis and interstitial œdema, which can progress to interstitial fibrosis. The extent of these lesions depends on donor characteristics (age, expanded criteria donor, etc.) and cold ischemia time. In the short term, ischemia-reperfusion results in delayed recovery of graft function. Cold ischemia time also impacts long-term graft survival. Preclinical models, such as murine and porcine models, have furthered understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Due to its renal anatomical proximity to humans, the porcine model is relevant to assessment of the molecules administered to a donor or recipient, and also of additives to preservation solutions. Different donor resuscitation and graft perfusion strategies can be studied. In humans, prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury is a research subject as concerns donor conditioning, additive molecules in preservation solutions, graft reperfusion modalities and choice of the molecules administered to the recipient. Pending significant advances in research, the goal is to achieve the shortest possible cold ischemia time.

Comparing the Effect of Immediate versus Delayed Initiation of Tacrolimus on Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Open-label Clinical Trial

Objective:

Delayed graft function (DGF) is an early complication after kidney transplantation with negative impact on allograft outcomes. This study assessed the effect of delayed initiation of tacrolimus as a nephrotoxic drug, on DGF occurrence and allograft function.

Methods:

This randomized, open-label clinical trial was conducted on kidney transplant recipients with the age of at least 14 years who underwent the first kidney transplantation from deceased or living donor. Patients were randomly allocated to immediate (n = 26) or delayed tacrolimus (n = 27) groups. All patients received thymoglobulin as induction therapy and similar maintenance immunosuppression including tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisolone with the difference in the time of initiation of tacrolimus either on the day of transplantation (immediate tacrolimus group) or day 3 after transplant (delayed tacrolimus group).

Findings:

DGF incidence (46.15% vs. 37.04%; P = 0.501) and duration (9.75 ± 6.41 vs. 8.6 ± 6.16 days; P = 0.675) were not different between the immediate and delayed tacrolimus groups. Estimated creatinine clearance using Cockcroft–Gault equation (63.14 ± 18.81 vs. 58.19 ± 19.42 mL/min in immediate and delayed tacrolimus groups respectively; P = 0.373) and estimated acute rejection-free survival were also comparable between the groups over the 3 months of follow-up. Compared with the immediate group, the delayed tacrolimus group showed higher estimated 3-month grafts' survival (100% vs. 84.27%; P = 0.072).

Conclusion:

Delayed initiation of tacrolimus after kidney transplantation under the umbrella of thymoglobulin induction did not result in either lower incidence or duration of DGF or improved the level of graft function in kidney transplant recipients but non-statistically significant increased 3-month grafts' survival.

Calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal or tapering for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) can reduce acute transplant rejection and immediate graft loss but are associated with significant adverse effects such as hypertension and nephrotoxicity which may contribute to chronic rejection. CNI toxicity has led to numerous studies investigating CNI withdrawal and tapering strategies. Despite this, uncertainty remains about minimisation or withdrawal of CNI.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to look at the benefits and harms of CNI tapering or withdrawal in terms of graft function and loss, incidence of acute rejection episodes, treatment-related side effects (hypertension, hyperlipidaemia) and death.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register to 11 October 2016 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies contained in the Specialised Register are identified through search strategies specifically designed for CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE; handsearching conference proceedings; and searching the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where drug regimens containing CNI were compared to alternative drug regimens (CNI withdrawal, tapering or low dose) in the post-transplant period were included, without age or dosage restriction.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed studies for eligibility, risk of bias, and extracted data. Results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 83 studies that involved 16,156 participants. Most were open-label studies; less than 30% of studies reported randomisation method and allocation concealment. Studies were analysed as intent-to-treat in 60% and all pre-specified outcomes were reported in 54 studies. The attrition and reporting bias were unclear in the remainder of the studies as factors used to judge bias were reported inconsistently. We also noted that 50% (47 studies) of studies were funded by the pharmaceutical industry.We classified studies into four groups: CNI withdrawal or avoidance with or without substitution with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTOR-I); and low dose CNI with or without mTOR-I. The withdrawal groups were further stratified as avoidance and withdrawal subgroups for major outcomes.CNI withdrawal may lead to rejection (RR 2.54, 95% CI 1.56 to 4.12; moderate certainty evidence), may make little or no difference to death (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.24; moderate certainty), and probably slightly reduces graft loss (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.98; low quality evidence). Hypertension was probably reduced in the CNI withdrawal group (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.95; low certainty), while CNI withdrawal may make little or no difference to malignancy (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.30; low certainty), and probably makes little or no difference to cytomegalovirus (CMV) (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.45; low certainty)CNI avoidance may result in increased acute rejection (RR 2.16, 95% CI 0.85 to 5.49; low certainty) but little or no difference in graft loss (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.16; low certainty). Late CNI withdrawal increased acute rejection (RR 3.21, 95% CI 1.59 to 6.48; moderate certainty) but probably reduced graft loss (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.97, low certainty).Results were similar when CNI avoidance or withdrawal was combined with the introduction of mTOR-I; acute rejection was probably increased (RR 1.43; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.78; moderate certainty) and there was probably little or no difference in death (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.36, moderate certainty). mTOR-I substitution may make little or no difference to graft loss (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.19; low certainty), probably makes little of no difference to hypertension (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.15; moderate), and probably reduced the risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.82; moderate certainty) and malignancy (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.00; low certainty). Lymphoceles were increased with mTOR-I substitution (RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.21; low certainty).Low dose CNI combined with mTOR-I probably increased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (MD 6.24 mL/min, 95% CI 3.28 to 9.119; moderate certainty), reduced graft loss (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.02; moderate certainty), and made little or no difference to acute rejection (RR 1.13 ; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.40; moderate certainty). Hypertension was decreased (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.20; low certainty) as was CMV (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.06; low certainty). Low dose CNI plus mTOR-I makes probably makes little of no difference to malignancy (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.42 to 3.53; low certainty) and may make little of no difference to death (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.90; moderate certainty).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

CNI avoidance increased acute rejection and CNI withdrawal increases acute rejection but reduced graft loss at least over the short-term. Low dose CNI with induction regimens reduced acute rejection and graft loss with no major adverse events, also in the short-term. The use of mTOR-I reduced CMV infections but increased the risk of acute rejection. These conclusions must be tempered by the lack of long-term data in most of the studies, particularly with regards to chronic antibody-mediated rejection, and the suboptimal methodological quality of the included studies.

Delayed graft function and its management in children

Delayed graft function (DGF) is commonly defined as the requirement for dialysis within the first 7 days following renal transplantation. The major underlying mechanism is related to ischaemia/reperfusion injury, which includes microvascular inflammation and cell death and apoptosis, and to the regeneration processes. Several clinical factors related to donor, recipient and organ procurement/transplantation procedures may increase the risk of DGF, including donor cardiovascular instability, older donor age, donor creatinine concentration, long cold ischaemia time and marked body mass index of both the donor and recipient. Some of these parameters have been used in specific predictive formulas created to assess the risk of DGF. A variety of other pre-, intra- and post-transplant clinical factors may also increase the risk of DGF, such as potential drug nephrotoxicity, surgical problems and/or hyperimmunization of the recipient. DGF may decrease the long-term graft function, but data on this effect are inconsistent, partially due to the many different types of organ donation. Relevant management strategies may be classified into the classic clinical approach, which has the aim of minimizing the individual risk factors of DGF, and specific pharmacologic strategies, which are designed to prevent or treat ischaemia/reperfusion injury. Both strategies are currently being evaluated in clinical trials.

Prediction, prevention, and management of delayed graft function: where are we now?

Delayed graft function (DGF) remains a major barrier to improved outcomes after kidney transplantation. High-risk transplant recipients can be identified, but no definitive prediction model exists. Novel biomarkers to predict DGF in the first hours post-transplant, such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), are under investigation. Donor management to minimize the profound physiological consequences of brain death is highly complex. A hormonal resuscitation package to manage the catecholamine "storm" that follows brain death is recommended. Donor pretreatment with dopamine prior to procurement lowers the rate of DGF. Hypothermic machine perfusion may offer a significant reduction in the rate of DGF vs simple cold storage, but costs need to be evaluated. Surgically, reducing warm ischemia time may be advantageous. Research into recipient preconditioning options has so far not generated clinically helpful interventions. Diagnostic criteria for DGF vary, but requirement for dialysis and/or persistent high serum creatinine is likely to remain key to diagnosis until current work on early biomarkers has progressed further. Management centers on close monitoring of graft (non)function and physiological parameters. With so many unanswered questions, substantial reductions in the toll of DGF in the near future seem unlikely but concentrated research on many levels offers long-term promise.

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction and risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease in adult and pediatric solid organ transplantation: An update

The most modifiable risk factor for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is the type and dose of induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. It is challenging to identify the contribution of a single agent such as rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) in the setting of multidrug therapy. Registry analyses can be helpful but are limited by methodological restrictions and inclusion of historical patient cohorts. These are typically from eras when rATG dosing was markedly higher than current dosing (e.g. total dose 14 mg/kg versus 6 mg/kg now), accompanied by higher exposure to maintenance therapies, and often an absence of antiviral prophylaxis. The largest registry analysis to assess rATG specifically found no risk of PTLD after kidney transplantation, but conflicting results have been reported, highlighting the difficulty of interpreting this type of analysis. The relative rarity of PTLD means that individually controlled trials are underpowered to assess its occurrence, but the available data do not suggest an effect of rATG. A pooled analysis of data from studies of rATG induction in kidney and heart transplantation found the incidence of PTLD to be comparable to published reports in the overall transplant population. Data on the effect of rATG dose are inconclusive, but in patients receiving antiviral prophylaxis it does not appear to be influential. Nevertheless, it would seem reasonable to employ the lowest dose of rATG compatible with effective induction, particularly in EBV-seronegative recipients and other high-risk groups such as heart-lung transplant recipients. Overall, the risk of PTLD following rATG induction therapy with modern dosing regimens and under current management conditions appears unlikely to make an important contribution to the risk:benefit balance.

A single-centre, open-label, prospective study of an initially short-term intensified dosing regimen of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium with reduced cyclosporine A exposure in Chinese live-donor kidney transplant recipients

AIMS

The nephrotoxicity of cyclosporine A (CsA) accounts for dysfunction of kidney allografts in the clinic. Short-term intensified dosing using enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) may facilitate CsA sparing after kidney transplantation without compromising safety.

METHODS

In a 12-month, single-centre open-label prospective trial, 180 de novo live-donor kidney transplant recipients at low-immunological risk were randomised to a low-dose cyclosporine group which received a low dose of cyclosporine, short-term intensified EC-MPS dosing (2160 mg/day to week 6, 1440 mg/day thereafter) and corticosteroids or a standard-dose cyclosporine group which received a standard dose of cyclosporine, standard EC-MPS dosing (1440 mg/day) and corticosteroids. The primary end-point [treatment failure including biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death], secondary end-point and adverse events were monitored.

RESULTS

The primary end-point (treatment failure) occurred in 13.3% (12/90) of the low-dose cyclosporine group and 16.7% (15/90) of the standard-dose cyclosporine group (p = 0.53) (difference -3.4%, 95% confidence interval -11.7% to 7.5%, based on a noninferiority margin of 20%). BPAR occurred in 11.1% and 13.3% of patients in the low-dose cyclosporine group and standard-dose cyclosporine group, respectively (p = 0.65). The estimated glomerular filtration rate, as calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula, was similar at 12 months after transplantation (low-dose cyclosporine group 63 ± 19 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and standard-dose cyclosporine group 59 ± 15 ml/min/1.73 m(2) ; p = 0.43). The levels of serum creatinine and occurrence of adverse events between the two groups were not statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS

A regimen of early intensified EC-MPS dosing permits low-dose cyclosporine in live-donor kidney transplant patients at low-immunological risk without compromising efficacy at 12 months' follow-up.

A useful scoring system for the prediction and management of delayed graft function following kidney transplantation from cadaveric donors

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication in kidney transplantation and is known to be correlated with short- and long-term graft outcomes. Here we explored the possibility of developing a simple tool that could predict with good confidence the occurrence of DGF and could be helpful in current clinical practice. We built a score, tentatively called DGFS, from a French multicenter and prospective cohort of 1844 adult recipients of deceased donor kidneys collected since 2007, and computerized in the Données Informatisées et VAlidées en Transplantation databank. Only five explicative variables (cold ischemia time, donor age, donor serum creatinine, recipient body mass index, and induction therapy) contributed significantly to the DGF prediction. These were associated with a good predictive capacity (area under the ROC curve at 0.73). The DGFS calculation is facilitated by an application available on smartphones, tablets, or computers at www.divat.fr/en/online-calculators/dgfs. The DGFS should allow the simple classification of patients according to their DGF risk at the time of transplantation, and thus allow tailored-specific management or therapeutic strategies.

Delayed kidney graft function: from mechanism to translation

In as many as 50% of cases the immediate post-kidney transplant course is complicated by delayed graft function that is most commonly related to ischemia and reperfusion injury. In addition to the acute complications related to renal failure and the associated economic impact of prolonged hospitalization, the development of delayed graft function is associated with an increased risk of chronic allograft nephropathy and shortened allograft survival. Challenges in understanding its mechanisms include the complexity, as contributors are derived from both the donor and the recipient. This acute kidney injury is modulated and caused by a complex interplay of events that lead to hypoxic and ischemic injury as well as to altered repair mechanisms. New therapies primarily seek to suppress the inflammatory homing of adaptive immune cells to the kidney, limit cell death, and/or interrupt detrimental signaling of necrosis. Although there are several promising novel targets and innovative therapeutics available, many challenges remain in their translation from bench to bedside. Identifying organs at risk and clearly defined end points will be critical in designing interventional trials.

The role of Thymoglobulin induction in kidney transplantation: an update

The rabbit antithymocyte globulin Thymoglobulin first became available over 25 yr ago and is the most widely used lymphocyte-depleting preparation in solid organ transplantation. Thymoglobulin targets a wide range of T-cell surface antigens as well as natural killer-cell antigens, B-cell antigens, plasma cell antigens, adhesion molecules and chemokine receptors, resulting in profound, long-lasting T-cell depletion. Randomized studies have established the anti-rejection efficacy of Thymoglobulin in kidney transplantation. Experimental and clinical data suggest that Thymoglobulin administration may ameliorate ischemia reperfusion injury, thus reducing the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF). Studies have demonstrated the benefit of using Thymoglobulin to facilitate immunosuppression minimization, both for corticosteroid and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal or avoidance, with potential improvement in cardiovascular and renal outcomes. The optimal cumulative dose for Thymoglobulin induction is 6-7.5 mg/kg, with vigilant short- and long-term monitoring of hematological status. Induction with Thymoglobulin is now indicated in immunologically high-risk patients, in those at increased risk of DGF and to maintain efficacy in low-risk transplant recipients receiving steroid or CNI minimization or avoidance regimens. We suggest that in future trials Thymoglobulin be tested with costimulation signal blockers and other immunosuppressants with the objective of establishing operational tolerance.

The nephroprotective properties of recombinant human erythropoietin in kidney transplantation: experimental facts and clinical proofs

Adaptive responses to hypoxia, including hypoxia-inducible factor signaling, allow the cell to satisfy its basal metabolic demand and avoid death, but these responses can also be deleterious by promoting inflammation, cell dedifferentiation and fibrogenesis. Therefore, targeting hypoxia constitutes a promising therapeutic avenue. Recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) appeared as a good candidate therapy because its hematopoietic properties could reverse anemia, and its tissue-protective properties could reduce cell death and limit maladaptive cellular responses to hypoxia. Despite experimental evidence on the nephroprotecive properties of rhEPO, recent clinical trials provided evidence that rhEPO was ineffective in preventing delayed graft function after ischemic acute injury but that the normalization of hemoglobin values preserved kidney function deterioration and reduced graft loss. Our aim here is to provide a survey of the rationale for evaluating the administration of rhEPO in the setting of kidney transplantation. We will discuss the intriguing findings that emerged from the clinical trials and the discrepancies between promising experimental results and negative clinical studies, as well as the differences in terms of the benefits and safety profiles of the normalization of hemoglobin values in chronic kidney disease patients and kidney transplant patients.

A CD3+ count-based thymoglobulin induction regimen permits delayed introduction of calcineurin inhibitors in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Withholding calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) can be considered when graft function is inadequate following kidney transplantation (KT). Thymoglobulin (rATG) can be used to prevent acute rejection while CNIs are being withheld. Here, we report our results of a novel CNI-sparing induction protocol, which utilizes a CD3+ cell count-based rATG treatment regimen when delayed graft function (DGF) develops in the immediate postoperative period.

METHODS

In a cohort of 153 consecutive deceased-donor KT recipients, all received a single intraoperative dose of basiliximab; 84 subsequently developed DGF and therefore received rATG (rATG+ group), while 69 demonstrated immediate graft function and received CNIs (rATG- group).

RESULTS

In the rATG+ group, mean duration of therapy was 8.5±6.0 d, permitting CNI initiation to be delayed until postoperative day 10.3±6.2. Cumulative dose of rATG was only 5.1±4.5 mg/kg while targeting CD3+ counts of ≤30 cells/mm3. CD3+ counts were reduced to a mean of 16.7±17.0 cells/mm3 during therapy. At one yr, patient and graft survival rates were 97.6% and 92.9%, respectively, while the frequency of infections and malignancies were not significantly increased compared to the rATG- group.

CONCLUSION

A unique induction regimen successfully delayed CNI initiation by using modest doses of rATG to deplete CD3+ cells, while yielding excellent long-term graft outcome without increased risk of infection or malignancy.

Steroid avoidance with early intensified dosing of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium: a randomized multicentre trial in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Short-term intensified dosing using enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) reduces rejection after kidney transplantation without compromising safety and may facilitate steroid avoidance.

METHODS

In a 6-month, multicentre open-label trial, 222 de novo kidney transplant recipients at low-immunological risk were randomized to steroid avoidance or maintenance steroids with interleukin (IL)-2 receptor antibody (IL-2RA) induction, EC-MPS (2160 mg/day to Week 6, 1440 mg/day thereafter) and cyclosporine.

RESULTS

The primary end point; treatment failure at Month 6 [biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or loss to follow-up], occurred in 17.9% (20/112) of steroid-avoidance patients and 14.5% (16/110) of controls (difference 3.4%, 95% confidence interval -6.3 to 13.1, P = 0.47 for superiority testing). BPAR occurred in 11.6 and 7.3% of patients in the steroid-avoidance and control arms, respectively (P = 0.27). Creatinine clearance was similar at Month 6 (steroid-avoidance 56 ± 18 mL/min/1.73 m(2), controls 60 ± 22 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P = 0.34). Cytomegalovirus infection, as reported by investigators, occurred in 12.5% of steroid-avoidance patients and 22.7% of controls (P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

A regimen of early intensified EC-MPS dosing with calcineurin inhibitor and IL-2RA induction permits oral steroid avoidance in adult kidney transplant patients at low-immunological risk without compromising efficacy at 6 months' follow-up.

Delayed graft function in the kidney transplant

Acute kidney injury occurs with kidney transplantation and too frequently progresses to the clinical diagnosis of delayed graft function (DGF). Poor kidney function in the first week of graft life is detrimental to the longevity of the allograft. Challenges to understand the root cause of DGF include several pathologic contributors derived from the donor (ischemic injury, inflammatory signaling) and recipient (reperfusion injury, the innate immune response and the adaptive immune response). Progressive demand for renal allografts has generated new organ categories that continue to carry high risk for DGF for deceased donor organ transplantation. New therapies seek to subdue the inflammatory response in organs with high likelihood to benefit from intervention. Future success in suppressing the development of DGF will require a concerted effort to anticipate and treat tissue injury throughout the arc of the transplantation process.

Meta-analysis of calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimens in kidney transplantation

Calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing strategies in kidney transplantation may spare patients the adverse effects of these drugs, but the efficacy of these strategies is unknown. Here, we conduct a meta-analysis to assess outcomes associated with reducing calcineurin inhibitor exposure from the time of transplantation. We search Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2010 that compared de novo calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimens to calcineurin-inhibitor-based regimens. In this analysis, we include 56 studies comprising data from 11337 renal transplant recipients. Use of the contemporary agents belatacept or tofacitinib, in combination with mycophenolate, decreased the odds of overall graft failure (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.39-0.96; P = 0.03). Similarly, minimization of calcineurin inhibitors in combination with various induction and adjunctive agents reduces the odds of graft failure (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.58-0.92; P = 0.009). Conversely, the use of inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), in combination with mycophenolate, increases the odds of graft failure (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.08-1.90; P = 0.01). Calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing strategies are associated with less delayed graft function (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.80-0.98; P = 0.02), improved graft function, and less new-onset diabetes. The more contemporary protocols did not seem to increase rates of acute rejection. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that reducing exposure to calcineurin inhibitors immediately after kidney transplantation may improve clinical outcomes.

A prospective, open-label, observational clinical cohort study of the association between delayed renal allograft function, tacrolimus exposure, and CYP3A5 genotype in adult recipients

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor with a macrolide lactone structure, is currently used as a cornerstone immunosuppressive drug in solid organ transplantation. It is metabolized by hepatic and intestinal cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4/3A5 enzymes and is a substrate for P-glycoprotein (ABCB1). The disposition of tacrolimus might be influenced by severe renal allograft dysfunction (eg, in cases of delayed graft function [DGF]). New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a known adverse effect of tacrolimus therapy and has been associated with DGF.

OBJECTIVES

The impact of DGF on tacrolimus C(min) and dose requirements was evaluated in renal transplant recipients in the first postoperative week. The effects of the CYP3A5*3 A6986G polymorphism on initial mean tacrolimus C(min) and dose requirements in the presence and absence of DGF were assessed. This study also tested the hypothesis that if DGF influences early tacrolimus exposure, this would lead to a higher risk for NODAT (defined as the need for glucose-lowering medication for an uninterrupted period of ≥ 26 weeks).

METHODS

This prospective, open-label, observational clinical cohort study enrolled renal allograft recipients aged ≥ 18 years. Tacrolimus was administered as an oral loading dose of 0.2 mg/kg/d and adjusted to achieve a target mean daily tacrolimus C(min) between 12 and 15 ng/mL. C(min) values and oral dose requirements in the first postoperative week were compared between patients with and without DGF. Patients were genotyped for the CYP3A4*1B -290A>G, CYP3A5*3 A6986G, ABCB1 Exon26 C3435T, ABCB1 Exon21 G2677T, and ABCB1 Exon21 G2677A single nucleotide polymorphisms. NODAT that occurred within the first 12 weeks after transplantation was confirmed using an oral glucose tolerance test.

RESULTS

A total of 304 patients were enrolled (184 men, 120 women; mean [SD] age, 52.9 [14.1] years). Through day 3 after transplantation, mean (SD) 12-hour tacrolimus C(min) values were significantly higher in recipients experiencing DGF despite identical loading doses of 0.2 mg/kg. Mean tacrolimus dose requirements were significantly lower in patients with DGF during the first week. After recovery of DGF, mean tacrolimus dose requirements were not significantly different between recipients with and without DGF. In homozygous CYP3A5*3 carriers (n = 252), mean (SD) tacrolimus dose requirements remained significantly lower during DGF, while in CYP3A5*1 carriers with DGF (n = 52), lower mean dose requirements were observed only after postoperative day 4. The proportion of patients in whom NODAT developed was significantly greater in patients with DGF and tacrolimus C(min) >15 ng/mL on the first day after transplantation (27.2%) compared with recipients who remained free of DGF and had C(min) ≤15 ng/mL on day 1 (6.5%) (P = 0.016). On logistic regression analysis, greater recipient age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.044; 95% CI, 1.009-1.080), higher tacrolimus C(min) on day 1 (OR = 1.048; 95% CI, 1.017-1.080), and DGF (OR = 2.968; 95% CI, 1.107-7.959) were associated with an increased risk for NODAT.

CONCLUSION

In this open-label, observational study, DGF was associated with higher initial mean tacrolimus C(min) values and lower daily dose requirements predominantly in CYP3A5 nonexpressers.

Acute respiratory failure in kidney transplant recipients: a multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

Data on pulmonary complications in renal transplant recipients are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate acute respiratory failure (ARF) in renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study in nine transplant centers of consecutive kidney transplant recipients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for ARF from 2000 to 2008.

RESULTS

Of 6,819 kidney transplant recipients, 452 (6.6%) required ICU admission, including 200 admitted for ARF. Fifteen (7.5%) of these patients had combined kidney-pancreas transplantations. The most common causes of ARF were bacterial pneumonia (35.5%), cardiogenic pulmonary edema (24.5%) and extrapulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (15.5%). Pneumocystis pneumonia occurred in 11.5% of patients. Mechanical ventilation was used in 93 patients (46.5%), vasopressors were used in 82 patients (41%) and dialysis was administered in 104 patients (52%). Both the in-hospital and 90-day mortality rates were 22.5%. Among the 155 day 90 survivors, 115 patients (74.2%) were dialysis-free, including 75 patients (65.2%) who recovered prior renal function. Factors independently associated with in-hospital mortality were shock at admission (odds ratio (OR) 8.70, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.25 to 23.29), opportunistic fungal infection (OR 7.08, 95% CI 2.32 to 21.60) and bacterial infection (OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.07 to 5.96). Five factors were independently associated with day 90 dialysis-free survival: renal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on day 1 (OR 0.68/SOFA point, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.88), bacterial infection (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.90), three or four quadrants involved on chest X-ray (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.91), time from hospital to ICU admission (OR 0.98/day, 95% CI 0.95 to 0.99) and oxygen flow at admission (OR 0.93/liter, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

In kidney transplant recipients, ARF is associated with high mortality and graft loss rates. Increased Pneumocystis and bacterial prophylaxis might improve these outcomes. Early ICU admission might prevent graft loss.

Use of kidney function end points in kidney transplant trials: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials in kidney transplantation are beginning to include markers of kidney function as end points now that traditional outcomes, such as acute rejection, become increasingly rare events. The frequency and type of kidney function end points used are unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTING & POPULATION

Randomized controlled trials in adult kidney transplant recipients reported in 5 major general medical journals and 5 major subspecialty journals in nephrology and transplantation between January 2003 and November 2008.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Inclusion of at least one kidney function end point at least 1 month posttransplant.

RESULTS

133 (79%) of 169 randomized trials identified used a kidney function end point. Of these, 37 (28%) used one or more measures of kidney function as the primary end point, and 81 (61%), as a secondary end point. For the primary end point, 21 (57%) trials used a creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), 18 (49%) used serum creatinine level, and 7 (19%) used measured GFR. Overall, eGFR was an end point in 81 (61%) trials, and measured GFR, in 12 (9%) trials.

LIMITATIONS

This review is limited by the poor quality of the included trials, with many not defining either primary or secondary end points.

CONCLUSIONS

Measures of kidney function are used commonly as surrogate end points in kidney transplant trials, with eGFR becoming more frequently used over time. Further data are needed to properly validate these surrogate end points and fully understand their limitations when designing and interpreting randomized trials.

High dose epoetin beta in the first weeks following renal transplantation and delayed graft function: Results of the Neo-PDGF Study

Erythropoietin promotes nephroprotection in animal models of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Neorecormon and Prevention of Delayed Graft Function (Neo-PDGF) is a French open-label multicenter randomized study to evaluate the effect of high doses of epoetin beta (EPO-beta) during the first 2 weeks of renal transplantation on renal function in patients at risk for delayed graft function (DGF). One hundred and four patients were included in the study. Patients randomized in treatment group (A) received four injections of EPO-beta (30.000 UI each), given before surgery and at 12 h, 7 days and 14 days posttransplantation. Patients randomized in control group (B) did not receive EPO-beta. Immunosuppression included induction with basiliximab and maintenance therapy with steroids, mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus. At 1 month posttransplant, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (MDRD formula) was 42.5 +/- 19.0 mL/min in the EPO-beta group and 44.0 +/- 16.3 mL/min in the control group (p = ns). The frequency of DGF was similar in both groups (32% vs. 38.8%; p = ns). No difference in the incidence of serious adverse events was observed. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00815867.).

Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists (IL2Ra) are used as induction therapy for prophylaxis against acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Use of IL2Ra has increased steadily since their introduction, but the proportion of new transplant recipients receiving IL2Ra differs around the globe, with 27% of new kidney transplant recipients in the United States, and 70% in Australasia receiving IL2Ra in 2007.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically identify and summarise the effects of using an IL2Ra, as an addition to standard therapy, or as an alternative to another immunosuppressive induction strategy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify new records, and authors of included reports were contacted for clarification where necessary.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in all languages comparing IL2Ra to placebo, no treatment, other IL2Ra or other antibody therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted and assessed independently by two authors, with differences resolved by discussion. Dichotomous outcomes are reported as relative risk (RR) and continuous outcomes as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 71 studies (306 reports, 10,537 participants). Where IL2Ra were compared with placebo (32 studies; 5,784 patients) graft loss including death with a functioning graft was reduced by 25% at six months (16 studies: RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.98) and one year (24 studies: RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.90), but not beyond this. At one year biopsy-proven acute rejection was reduced by 28% (14 studies: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.81), and there was a 19% reduction in CMV disease (13 studies: RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.97). There was a 64% reduction in early malignancy within six months (8 studies: RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.86), and creatinine was lower (7 studies: MD -8.18 micromol/L 95% CI -14.28 to -2.09) but these differences were not sustained.When IL2Ra were compared to ATG (16 studies, 2211 participants), there was no difference in graft loss at any time point, or for acute rejection diagnosed clinically, but the was benefit of ATG therapy over IL2Ra for biopsy-proven acute rejection at one year (8 studies:, RR 1.30 95% CI 1.01 to 1.67), but at the cost of a 75% increase in malignancy (7 studies: RR 0.25 95% CI 0.07 to 0.87) and a 32% increase in CMV disease (13 studies: RR 0.68 95% CI 0.50 to 0.93). Serum creatinine was significantly lower for IL2Ra treated patients at six months (4 studies: MD -11.20 micromol/L 95% CI -19.94 to -2.09). ATG patients experienced significantly more fever, cytokine release syndrome and other adverse reactions to drug administration and more leucopenia but not thrombocytopenia. There were no significant differences in outcomes according to cyclosporine or tacrolimus use, azathioprine or mycophenolate, or to the study populations baseline risk for acute rejection. There was no evidence that effects were different according to whether equine or rabbit ATG was used.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Given a 38% risk of rejection, per 100 recipients compared with no treatment, nine recipients would need treatment with IL2Ra to prevent one recipient having rejection, 42 to prevent one graft loss, and 38 to prevent one having CMV disease over the first year post-transplantation. Compared with ATG treatment, ATG may prevent some experiencing acute rejection, but 16 recipients would need IL2Ra to prevent one having CMV, but 58 would need IL2Ra to prevent one having malignancy. There are no apparent differences between basiliximab and daclizumab. IL2Ra are as effective as other antibody therapies and with significantly fewer side effects.

A randomized trial comparing renal function in older kidney transplant patients following delayed versus immediate tacrolimus administration

BACKGROUND

This large, randomized, multicenter trial evaluated if basiliximab induction and delayed tacrolimus can preserve renal function in older kidney transplant patients.

METHODS

Patients aged 60 years and older received delayed tacrolimus with basiliximab and mycophenolate mofetil with early steroid discontinuation (Tac-d, n=132) or standard tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids until day 91 (Tac-s, n=122). Tacrolimus trough levels were 5 to 10 ng/mL after day 43 in both groups. Renal function at month 6 was measured by calculated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault formula).

RESULTS

In both groups, mean recipient age was 66 years, mean donor age was 63 years with 73% of donors aged 60 years and older. Steroid discontinuation was slower than protocol specified. In the Tac-d group, 56.1% were steroid free at day 14 and 81.8% at month 6. In the Tac-s group, 37.7% were steroid free at month 4 and 63.9% at month 6. Mean (+/-SD) calculated creatinine clearance was 45.7+/-16.1 mL/min (Tac-d) and 45.0+/-18.2 mL/min (Tac-s) (P=ns), mean glomerular filtration rate (modified diet in renal disease formula) was 44.9+/-16.2 mL/min and 41.6+/-16.8 mL/min, respectively. Incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection were 18.9% (Tac-d) and 18.0% (Tac-s). Delayed graft function was 30.3% (Tac-d) and 23.8% (Tac-s). Estimated patient survival rates (Kaplan-Meier) in the Tac-d and Tac-s groups were 96.1% vs. 99.2% and estimated graft survival rates were 90% vs. 87.6%, respectively. Safety results were similar with both regimens.

CONCLUSION

Delayed tacrolimus with basiliximab induction did not provide an advantage in preserving renal function or reducing delayed graft function in older kidney transplant patients.

Safety of low-dose cyclosporine therapy before transplantation in kidney allograft recipients

INTRODUCTION

Graft dysfunction immediately posttransplantation can vary from subtle slowing of the expected decrease in creatinine concentration to frank oliguria requiring dialysis therapy for days to weeks. Risk factors for slow and delayed graft function include prolonged preservation, older donor age, and high plasma renin activity in the recipient. Cyclosporine (CsA) nephrotoxicity is another cause of early kidney allograft dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate early kidney allograft function in patients who received low-dose CsA therapy for 48 hours before transplant surgery for comparison with that in recipients who received CsA therapy after improvement in allograft function.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a case-control comparative study, 66 kidney recipients were divided into 2 groups on the basis of time of initiation of CsA therapy. In group 1, patients received CsA, 100 mg twice a day, for 48 hours before surgery, and in group 2, patients received CsA therapy after surgery when allograft function had improved (serum creatinine concentration <or=3 mg/dL). Other immunosuppression medications were the same in both groups. Statistical analysis was performed to compare kidney allograft function in the first month posttransplantation.

RESULTS

In group 1 vs group 2, at day 1 posttransplantation, mean (SD) blood urea concentration was 73.72 (31.00) mg/dL vs 87.52 (29.82) mg/dL, serum creatinine concentration was 5.11 (1.83) mg/dL vs 6.42 (3.64) mg/dL, and urine volume in 24 hours was 11,052 (4290) mL vs 9629 (45.30) mL. At the end of the study, blood urea concentration was 49.61 (12.18) mg/dL vs 69.11 (33.76) mg/dL, serum creatinine concentration was 1.22 (0.28) mg/dL vs 1.47 (0.79) mg/dL, and urine volume in 24 hours was 3202 (986) mL vs 3095 (726) mL. No significant difference was noted between the 2 groups for age, sex, and immunosuppression medications.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose CsA therapy before transplant surgery preserves early allograft function without deleterious effects.

Anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies-basiliximab and daclizumab-for the prevention of acute rejection in renal transplantation

The use of antibody induction after kidney transplantation has increased from 25% to 63% in the past decade and roughly one half of the induction agent used is anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody (IL-2RA, ie, basiliximab or daclizumab). When combined with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression, IL-2RAs have been shown to reduce the incidence of acute rejection, one of the predictors of poor graft survival, without increasing risks of infections and malignancies in kidney transplantation. For low-immunological-risk patients, IL-2RAs, as compared with lymphocyte-depleting antibodies, are equally efficacious and have better safety profiles. For high-risk patients, however, IL-2RAs may be inferior to lymphocyte-depleting antibodies for the prophylaxis of acute rejection. In an effort to reduce toxicities of other immunosuppressive medications without increasing the risk of acute rejection and chronic graft loss, IL-2RAs have often been combined with steroid- and CNI-sparing immunosuppression protocols. More data support the benefits of early steroid withdrawal with IL-2RA in low-risk patients, but preferred induction therapy for high-risk patients has yet to be determined. Although CNI-sparing protocols with IL-2RA may preserve renal function and improve long-term survival in selected patients, further studies are needed to identify those who benefit most from this strategy.

Combined heart-kidney transplantation: a review of recipient selection and patient outcomes

Elevated serum creatinine is a common finding among patients awaiting heart transplantation because of reduced renal perfusion in the setting of severe heart failure as well as overlapping risk factors for chronic kidney disease and heart disease. Patients with significant renal dysfunction preoperatively have worse outcomes with heart transplantation alone compared with those with normal renal function or those with renal dysfunction who undergo combined heart-kidney transplantation. Optimizing organ distribution and patient outcomes after cardiac transplantation requires appropriate recipient selection, including deciding which patients will benefit from combined heart-kidney transplantation. This review focuses on the evaluation of patients with chronic kidney disease awaiting heart transplantation and the outcomes of combined heart-kidney transplantation.

Similar outcomes with different rates of delayed graft function may reflect center practice, not center performance

To better understand the implications for considering delayed graft function (DGF) as a performance measure, we compared outcomes associated with a 2- to 3-fold difference in the incidence of DGF at two transplant centers. We analyzed 5072 kidney transplantations between 1984 and 2006 at the University of Minnesota Medical Center (UMMC) and Hennepin County Medical Center (HCMC). In logistic regression the adjusted odds ratio for DGF at HCMC versus UMMC was 3.11 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]= 2.49-3.89) for deceased donors and 2.24 (CI = 1.45-3.47) for living donors. In Cox analysis of 4957 transplantations, slow graft function (SGF; creatinine >or=3.0 mg/dL [230 micromol/L] on day 5 without dialysis) was associated with graft failure at UMMC (Relative Risk [RR]= 1.43, CI = 1.25-1.64), but not HCMC (RR = 0.99, CI = 0.77-1.28). RR's of DGF were similar at both centers. Thus, the lower incidence of DGF at UMMC likely resulted in a higher incidence and higher risk of SGF compared to HCMC. Indeed, graft survival for recipients with DGF at HCMC was similar (p = 0.3741) to that of recipients with SGF at UMMC. We conclude that dialysis per se is likely not a cause of worse graft outcomes. A better definition is needed to measure early graft dysfunction and its effects across transplant programs.

HLA-A amino acid polymorphism and delayed kidney allograft function

Delayed allograft function (DGF) is a common adverse event in postrenal transplantation. The etiology of DGF is thought to include both nonimmunologic (donor age, cold ischemia time, and recipient race) and immunologic factors. We examined the association of DGF with amino acid mismatches at 66 variable sites of the HLA-A molecule in a prospective cohort study of 697 renal transplant recipients of deceased donors. Using a multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for nonimmunologic risk factors, we show that combinations of a few amino acid mismatches at crucial sites of HLA-A molecules were associated with DGF. In Caucasian recipients, a mismatch at position 62, 95, or 163, all known to be functionally important within the antigen recognition site, was associated with an increased risk for DGF. Furthermore, a decreased risk for DGF was associated with a mismatch at HLA-A family-specific sites (149, 184, 193, or 246), indicating that evolutionary features of HLA-A polymorphism separating HLA-A families and lineages among donor-recipient pairs may correlate with the magnitude of alloreactivity influencing the development of DGF. These findings suggest that amino acid polymorphisms at functionally important positions at the antigen recognition site of the HLA-A molecule have a significant influence on DGF.

[Delayed graft function]

Delayed return to kidney function after transplantation is characterized essentially by acute ischemic tubular necrosis. It remains frequent and has no curative treatment. However, an induction treatment of antilymphocyte serum may reduce the delay in recuperation. In patients with delayed function, the maintenance immunosuppressive treatment should take into account the excessive risk of acute rejection over the short term and the more rapid deterioration of renal function over the long term. This means that biopsies to screen for acute rejection should be done systematically before the end of the 3rd month and anticalcineurin toxicity-sparing treatment should be considered, replacing anticalcineurins immediately with belatacept or after the 3-month acute period with proliferation signal inhibitors, if the kidney histology tests permit. In all cases, the classical measures of kidney protection remain indispensable.

A randomized trial of basiliximab with three different patterns of cyclosporin A initiation in renal transplant from expanded criteria donors and at high risk of delayed graft function

This study assays therapy with basiliximab and different patterns of cyclosporin A (CsA) initiation in renal transplant (RT) recipients from expanded criteria donors (ECD) and at high risk of delayed graft function (DGF). A multicentre six-month open-label randomized trial with three parallel groups treated with basiliximab plus steroids, mycophenolate mofetil and different patterns of CsA initiation: early within 24 h post-RT at 3 mg/kg/d (Group 1; n = 38), and at 5 mg/kg/d (Group 2; n = 40), or delayed after 7-10 d at 5 mg/kg/d (Group 3; n = 36). There were no differences among groups in six months GFR (43.1 +/- 12, 48.0 +/- 14 and 47.2 +/- 17 mL/min, respectively), DGF (Group 1: 31%, Group 2: 37%, Group 3: 42%), nor biopsy-proven acute rejection, although clinically treated and biopsy-proven acute rejection was significantly higher in Group 3 (25%) vs. Group 1 (5.3%, p < 0.05). At six months no differences were observed in death-censored graft survival or patient survival. Induction therapy with basiliximab and three CsA-ME initiation patterns in RT recipients from ECD and at high risk of DGF presented good renal function and graft survival at six months. Late onset group did not achieve improvement in DGF rate and showed a higher incidence of clinically treated and biopsy-proven acute rejection.

Cold ischemia is a major determinant of acute rejection and renal graft survival in the modern era of immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to examine, in a recent cohort of kidney transplant recipients who have received modern immunosuppressive therapy, the respective role of cold ischemia time (CIT) and delayed graft function (DGF) on acute rejection (AR) rates and long-term graft survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 611 renal transplantations between 1996 and 2005. Most patients received a calcineurin inhibitor as maintenance therapy, either cyclosporine (43%) or tacrolimus (52%) and 76% of the patients received an antilymphocyte induction therapy. Study endpoints were DGF, first-year AR, and long-term graft survival. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors that may have influenced the study outcomes.

RESULTS

DGF was observed in 16.2% of patients. Both older donor age and longer CIT were significant risk factors for DGF. DGF rates were similar whether patients received a calcineurin inhibitor before transplantation or not. AR occurred in 16.5% of grafts during the first year. Independent predictors of AR by multivariate analysis were duration of dialysis, CIT, current panel-reactive lymphocytotoxic antibody more than 5%, and the number of human leukocyte antigen-A, B, and DR mismatches. Each hour of cold ischemia increases the risk of rejection by 4%. With respect to death-censored graft survival, three pretransplant parameters emerged as independent predictors of graft loss: younger recipient age, peak panel-reactive lymphocytotoxic antibody more than 5% and longer CIT. The detrimental effect of CIT on graft survival was entirely because of its propensity to trigger AR. When AR was added to the multivariate Cox model, CIT was no longer significant whereas first-year AR became the most important predictor of graft loss (Hazards ratio, 4.6).

CONCLUSION

Shortening CIT will help to decrease not only DGF rates but also AR incidence and hence graft loss. Patients with prolonged CIT should receive adequate immunosuppression, possibly with antilymphocyte preparations, to prevent AR occurrence.

Mycophenolate mofetil vs. sirolimus in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus (SRL) are effective immunosuppressive drugs with distinct safety profile.

METHODS

Kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus (TAC)-based immunosuppressive regimen were randomized to receive fixed daily doses of MMF (2 g/d, n = 50) or SRL (one loading dose of 15 mg, 5 mg/d till day 7 and 2 mg/d thereafter, n = 50) without induction therapy.

RESULTS

No differences were observed in the incidence of the composite (biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss or death) end-point (18% vs. 16%, p = 1.000), biopsy confirmed acute rejection (12% vs. 14%, p = 1.000), one-yr patient (94% vs. 98%, p = 0.308), graft (92% vs. 98%, p = 0.168), and death-censored graft survival (98% vs. 100%, p = 0.317) comparing patients receiving MMF or SRL respectively. Patients receiving SRL showed worse safety outcomes, higher mean creatinine (1.6 +/- 0.5 mg/dL vs. 1.4 +/- 0.3 mg/dL, p = 0.007), higher proportion of patients with proteinuria (52.0% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.041), higher mean urinary protein concentrations (0.3 +/- 0.5 g/L vs. 0.1 +/- 0.2 g/L, p = 0.012), higher mean cholesterol concentration (217 mg/dL vs. 190 mg/dL, p = 0.030), and higher proportion of patients prematurely discontinued from randomized therapy (26% vs. 8%, p = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

In patients receiving TAC, MMF produced similar efficacy but superior safety profile compared with SRL.

Renal function with delayed or immediate cyclosporine microemulsion in combination with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and steroids: results of follow up to 30 months post-transplant

BACKGROUND

In the multicenter, open-label Myriade study, renal transplant patients were randomized to early cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME, day 0) or delayed CsA-ME (day 6) with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS), steroids and interleukin-2 receptor induction. One-yr results have been published previously. We now report the results of an extension study in which patients were followed up for a period of three yr post-transplant.

METHODS

All patients completing the one-yr core study on-treatment were eligible to enter the extension study.

RESULTS

Of the 203 patients, 153 completed the core trial on-treatment; 144 (94%) entered the extension study with a minimum follow-up of one yr (73 early CsA-ME, 71 delayed CsA-ME). In 75% of patients receiving EC-MPS during the extension, the recommended dose was administered (1440 mg/d). Median creatinine clearance remained constant (57 mL/min) at 12, 24 and 30 months post-transplant and was similar in the early and delayed CsA-ME groups as well as in subpopulations with or without delayed graft function. One patient in the early CsA-ME group died. No grafts were lost. The incidence of BPAR from time of transplant to the end of the extension study was 17% (24/139). Seven patients (5%) discontinued the extension study prematurely because of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that a regimen of CsA-ME, EC-MPS and steroids results in excellent survival rates with stable renal function over a mean follow-up of 30 months. Immediate introduction of CsA-ME has no deleterious effect on long-term renal function, even among patients with delayed graft function.

Effect of brain-dead donor resuscitation on delayed graft function: results of a monocentric analysis

BACKGROUND

We have previously shown that a delayed graft function (DGF) longer than 6 days was a crucial threshold for long-term graft outcome. The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation of DGF >or=6 days with brain-dead donor variables, including those related to resuscitation, in a population of 262 consecutive brain-dead donors from 1990 to 2003.

METHODS

We used a marginal logistic model in which DGF was considered as a binary variable with a cutoff of 6 days.

RESULTS

Monovariate analysis of donor parameters showed that male, age above 35 years, primary history of hypertension, hydroxyethyl starch (HES) fluid greater than 1500 mL or epinephrine infusion during resuscitation were risk factors for prolonged DGF. The multivariate logistic regression model showed that epinephrine use during donor resuscitation (P<0.001, odds ratio [OR]=4.35), cold ischemia time (CIT) >or=16 hr (P=0.01, OR=2.16), and recipient age >55 years (P=0.003, OR=2.75), were associated with a risk of prolonged DGF. A long stay (>40 hr) in intensive care and a large volume of colloids (>1250 mL, except HES) correlated with a lower risk of DGF.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows an impact for only a limited number of brain dead donor resuscitation parameters on DGF duration. We also show that CIT has a much lower threshold (<16 hr) for DGF risk than previously described. Importantly, we show that recipient age is clearly a major independent risk factor for prolonged DGF, whereas donor age seems to act mostly as a dependent risk factor.

Efficacy and Safety of Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients: Pooled Data From Three 12-Month Multicenter, Open-Label, Prospective Studies

BACKGROUND

The myfortic Prospective Multicenter Study (myPROMS) utilizes a core protocol in which renal transplant patients receive enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and cyclosporine microemulsion. Substudies investigate specific aspects of the immunosuppressive regimen.

METHODS

A pooled analysis of three 12-month myPROMS substudies in de novo renal transplant patients was undertaken. Patients in the US01 and DE01 substudies were randomized to higher or lower cyclosporine C(2) target ranges; patients in FR01 were randomized to early or delayed introduction of cyclosporine. All patients received steroids and interleukin-2 receptor antagonist induction.

RESULTS

In total, 456 patients were included in the pooled analysis. Treatment failure (biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death) occurred in 118 patients (25.9%) by month 12, with biopsy-proven acute rejection reported in 101 patients (22.1%). Fourteen patients (3.1%) lost their graft, and six patients died (1.3%). Median calculated creatinine clearance was 62.9 mL/min at month 12 (median serum creatinine, 138 +/- 51 mumol/L). Gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events were reported in 354 patients (77.6%); these were mild or moderate in 323 patients. Within 12 months, 16.2% of patients required EC-MPS dose changes for GI adverse events. GI disorders led to EC-MPS discontinuation in only 10 patients (2.2%). Over the 12-month study, mean EC-MPS dose was 1352 +/- 230 mg/d (94% of recommended dose).

CONCLUSION

Cyclosporine, EC-MPS, and steroids with interleukin-2 antagonist induction offers effective and well-tolerated immunosuppression following renal transplantation. Graft survival was excellent and renal function was stable. High EC-MPS dosing was sustained throughout (>90% recommended dose) and dose modifications due to EC-MPS-related adverse events or infections were infrequent.

Tolerability of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium to 1 year in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids in renal transplant recipients

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) is therapeutically equivalent to mycophenolate mofetil, but delays release of mycophenolic acid until it reaches the small intestine. De novo renal transplant patients taking part in a 12-month, multicenter, randomized study received cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME, early or delayed to day 6), EC-MPS, steroids, and interleukin-2 antagonist induction. Tolerability data relating to EC-MPS are reported. Ninety-seven patients were randomized to early CsA-ME and 100 patients to delayed CsA-ME. Median daily dose of EC-MPS was 1440 mg at all time points throughout the 12-month period. The most frequently reported adverse events were constipation, anemia, urinary tract infection, abdominal pain, leukopenia, and cytomegalovirus infection; there were four malignancies. Fifty patients (24.6%) discontinued EC-MPS prematurely by 12 months, including 42 patients (84%) who discontinued owing to adverse events. No patient discontinued treatment because of gastrointestinal adverse events. Two-thirds of patients (137 [67.5%]) maintained full EC-MPS dose throughout the 12-month study and did not require any dose reduction or dose interruption. EC-MPS is well tolerated in de novo renal transplant recipients when administered in combination with CsA-ME and steroids, with low rates of dose reductions or interruptions. Gastrointestinal adverse events were responsible for dose reduction or interruption in only 5% of patients.