Liver transplantation from an identical twin without immunosuppression, with early recurrence of hepatitis C

Living-Donor Liver Transplantation for a Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Genetically Identical Twin Sister

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is, to date, the most common malignant tumor of the liver and is commonly staged with the Milan criteria. While deceased-donor liver transplantations (DDLT) are reserved for patients within the Milan criteria, living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) might be a curative option for patients outside the Milan criteria. We here report a case of a 32-year-old woman who developed a giant, unresectable HCC out of a hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) after a pregnancy. The genetically identical twin sister donated her left hemi-liver after ethical approval and preoperative screening. No long-term immunosuppressive therapy was necessary, and after more than eight years, both are in perfect health and the recipient gave birth to a second child. This case shows that in certain situations large HCCs outside the standard criteria can be cured by LT. Careful evaluation of both donor and recipient should be performed for indications like this to assure optimal clinical outcome.

Liver Transplantation from a Human Leukocyte Antigen-Matched Sibling Donor: Effectiveness of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy against Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Through living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) from a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor, it may be possible to stop the use of immunosuppressants. It is possible that acute antibody-mediated rejection and chronic active antibody-mediated rejection through the positivity of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies and/or T cell-mediated rejection may affect the prognosis of liver transplantation. The etiologies of liver diseases of the recipient may also affect the post-transplantation course. Herein, we report on the successful re-treatment with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy against hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in a patient who underwent a LDLT from HLA-matched sibling donor. After liver transplantation for HCV-related liver diseases, it is easy for HCV to re-infect the graft liver under a lack of immunosuppressants. DAA therapy against HCV re-infection immediately after transplantation should be commenced, and it is important to eradicate HCV for better prognosis of the recipients in LDLT for HCV-related liver diseases.

The impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living-donor liver transplantation

Donor-recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility has not been considered to significantly affect liver transplantation (LT) outcomes; however, its significance in living-donor LT (LDLT), which is mostly performed between blood relatives, remains unclear. This retrospective cohort study included 1954 LDLTs at our institution (1990-2020). The primary and secondary endpoints were recipient survival and the incidence of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) after LDLT, respectively, according to the number of HLA mismatches at all five loci: HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DR, and HLA-DQ. Subgroup analyses were also performed in between-siblings that characteristically have widely distributed 0-10 HLA mismatches. A total of 1304 cases of primary LDLTs were finally enrolled, including 631 adults (recipient age at LT ≥18 years) and 673 children (<18 years). In adult-to-adult LDLT, the more HLA mismatches at each locus, the significantly worse the recipient survival was (p = 0.03, 0.01, 0.03, 0.001, and <0.001 for HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DR, and HLA-DQ, respectively). This trend was more pronounced when multiple loci were combined (all p < 0.001 for A + B + DR, A + B + C, DR + DQ, and A + B + C + DR + DQ). Notably, a total of three or more HLA-B + DR mismatches was an independent risk factor for both TCMR (hazard ratio [HR] 2.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-5.87; p = 0.02) and recipient survival (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.11-5.35; p = 0.03) in between-siblings. By contrast, HLA mismatch did not affect pediatric LDLT outcomes at any locus or in any combinations; however, it should be noted that all donor-recipient relationships are parent-to-child that characteristically possesses one or less HLA mismatch at each locus and maximally five or less mismatches in total. In conclusion, HLA mismatch significantly affects not only TCMR development but also recipient survival in adult LDLT, but not in children.

Immunosuppression Free Protocol for Liver Transplant from an Identical Twin Mimicking Positive Donor-Specific Antibodies: A Case Report

There are some reported cases of liver transplant between identical twins with no immunosuppressants because of their matched HLA. However, there is no mention of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Here, we report a rare case of living donor liver transplant (LDLT) between identical twins, mimicking DSA positivity, on a low-dose immunosuppression protocol. A 57-year-old man with acute liver failure underwent LDLT using the right lobe from his identical twin. Their blood types were identical on HLA matching. However, the preoperative DSA test results were positive for class II antibodies. This was supposed to be due to the relatively large amount of blood transfusion before testing: a total of 580 units of fresh frozen plasma for plasma exchange. The presence of class II antibodies for DSA positivity was the result of the passive immunity from transfusion, and this result could not be ignored, given the risk of rejection. Therefore, we arranged low-dose postoperative immunosuppressants using tacrolimus at a quarter dose and no mycophenolate mofetil. The postoperative course was uneventful. A few months after LDLT, the patient's DSA level was negative for class II antibodies, thus confirming our preoperative hypothesis of DSA as the result of transfusion. Currently, 6 months after LDLT, he is free from immunosuppressive medication with good liver function. When administering relatively large doses of fresh frozen plasma by repeated plasma exchange before LDLT, even between identical twins, it is important to consider that the DSA test could be positive and that immunosuppressive treatment should be performed carefully.

A pilot study of operational tolerance with a regulatory T-cell-based cell therapy in living donor liver transplantation

Potent immunosuppressive drugs have significantly improved early patient survival after liver transplantation (LT). However, long-term results remain unsatisfactory because of adverse events that are largely associated with lifelong immunosuppression. To solve this problem, different strategies have been undertaken to induce operational tolerance, for example, maintenance of normal graft function and histology without immunosuppressive therapy, but have achieved limited success. In this pilot study, we aimed to induce tolerance using a novel regulatory T-cell-based cell therapy in living donor LT. Adoptive transfer of an ex vivo-generated regulatory T-cell-enriched cell product was conducted in 10 consecutive adult patients early post-LT. Cells were generated using a 2-week coculture of recipient lymphocytes with irradiated donor cells in the presence of anti-CD80/86 monoclonal antibodies. Immunosuppressive agents were tapered from 6 months, reduced every 3 months, and completely discontinued by 18 months. After the culture, the generated cells displayed cell-number-dependent donor-specific inhibition in the mixed lymphocyte reaction. Infusion of these cells caused no significant adverse events. Currently, all patients are well with normal graft function and histology. Seven patients have completed successful weaning and cessation of immunosuppressive agents. At present, they have been drug free for 16-33 months; 4 patients have been drug free for more than 24 months. The other 3 recipients with autoimmune liver diseases developed mild rejection during weaning and then resumed conventional low-dose immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

A cell therapy using an ex vivo-generated regulatory T-cell-enriched cell product is safe and effective for drug minimization and operational tolerance induction in living donor liver recipients with nonimmunological liver diseases. (Hepatology 2016;64:632-643).

Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplant

End stage liver disease from hepatitis C is the most common indication for liver transplantation in many parts of the world accounting for up to 40% of liver transplants. Antiviral therapy either before or after liver transplantation is challenging due to side effects and lower efficacy in patients with cirrhosis and liver transplant recipients, as well as from drug interactions with immunosuppressants. Factors that may affect recurrent hepatitis C include donor age, immunosuppression, IL28B genotype, cytomegalovirus infection, and metabolic syndrome. Older donor age has persistently been shown to have the greatest impact on recurrent hepatitis C. After liver transplantation, distinguishing recurrent hepatitis C from acute cellular rejection may be difficult, although the development of molecular markers may help in making the correct diagnosis. The advent of interferon free regimens with direct acting antiviral agents that include NS3/4A protease inhibitors, NS5B polymerase inhibitors and NS5A inhibitors holds great promise in improving outcomes for liver transplant candidates and recipients.

Strategies to reduce hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major health problem that leads to chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, being the most frequent indication for liver transplantation in several countries. Unfortunately, HCV re-infects the liver graft almost invariably following reperfusion, with an accelerated history of recurrence, leading to 10%-30% of patients progressing to cirrhosis within 5 years of transplantation. In this sense, some groups have even advocated for not re-transplanting this patients, as lower patient and graft outcomes have been reported. However, the management of HCV recurrence is being optimized and several strategies to reduce post-transplant recurrence could improve outcomes, decrease the rate of re-transplantation and optimize the use of available grafts. Three moments may be the focus of potential actions in order to decrease the impact of viral recurrence: the pre-transplant moment, the transplant environment and the post-transplant management. In the pre-transplant setting, it is not well established if reducing the pre transplant viral load affects the risk for HCV progression after transplant. Obviously, antiviral treatment can render the patient HCV RNA negative post transplant but the long-term benefit has not yet been fully established to justify the cost and clinical risk. In the transplant moment, factors as donor age, cold ischemia time, graft steatosis and ischemia/reperfusion injury may lead to a higher and more aggressive viral recurrence. After the transplant, discussion about immunosuppression and the moment to start the treatment (prophylactic, pre-emptive or once-confirmed) together with new antiviral drugs are of interest. This review aims to help clinicians have a global overview of post-transplant HCV recurrence and strategies to reduce its impact on our patients.

Impact of calcineurin inhibitors on hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The aim of this retrospective study is to assess the impact of calcineurin inhibitors on hepatitis C virus recurrence following liver transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 396 patients underwent liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus-induced liver disease between 1991 and 2005 at a single center. We examined the pre- and post-operative characteristics of patients who received either cyclosporine (n = 126) or tacrolimus (n = 270) as maintenance immunosuppression. In addition, we compared the postoperative course, including patient, graft and hepatitis C virus recurrence-free survival between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in either post-operative hepatitis C virus-ribonucleic acid or histological fibrosis score (performed within 6 months after transplant per protocol). The graft and patient survivals did not differ between the two groups (logrank p = 0.34 and 0.15, respectively). Histologic hepatitis C virus recurrence-free survival, however, was significantly higher in the cyclosporine group than in the tacrolimus group (55.4 vs. 30.8% at 1 year, 18.6 vs. 10.3% at 3 years, 16.7 vs. 8.1% at 5 years, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients transplanted for hepatitis C virus and treated with cyclosporine versus tacrolimus may have a higher recurrence-free survival.

Significance of C4d staining in ABO-identical/compatible liver transplantation

Complement degradation product C4d has become an important marker of humoral or antibody-mediated rejection in renal and heart allograft biopsies. Although there have been several reports on the detection of C4d in liver allografts, the significance of C4d in liver transplantation and its relationship with humoral rejection are still not clear. We investigated the frequency and pattern of C4d staining in liver allograft biopsies with reference to preoperative lymphocyte crossmatch tests, which detect donor-reactive lymphocyte antibody. Survival rates at 5 years were 77% for crossmatch-negative patients and 53% for crossmatch-positive patients (P=0.009). In crossmatch-negative patients, reproducible positive staining was obtained in 28 of 86 (33%) biopsies taken within 90 days after transplantation and 33 of 96 (34%) biopsies 90 days or after transplantation. Most C4d staining was observed in the portal areas, and no clear correlation was observed between C4d positivity and histological diagnosis. In crossmatch-positive patients, 9 of 11 (82%) biopsies showed positivity for C4d. C4d stained perivenular areas as well as portal areas. Histology of crossmatch-positive patients included acute rejection and cholangitis, but did not include periportal changes that were seen in humoral rejection in ABO-incompatible liver transplantation. In summary, focal C4d deposition was seen in various types of liver allograft injury and had little clinical impact on crossmatch-negative patients, but extensive C4d staining in crossmatch-positive patients may be associated with humoral rejection and poor graft survival.