Renal allograft protection with angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists

Short-term Effects of Losartan on Cardiovascular Risk and Allograft Injury Biomarkers in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

There is a controversy over the renoprotective and cardioprotective effects of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The aim of the study was to evaluate the short-term effects of losartan on allograft injury, cardiovascular risk biomarkers and safety of the treatment in KTRs.

METHODS

An interim analysis of a prospective, open, multicenter, controlled clinical trial CELART (Cardiovascular Effects of Losartan After Renal Transplantation) was performed. KTRs were allocated to losartan (L) 50 to 100 mg or standard hypotensive treatment (ST) group to reach target blood pressure (BP) <140/90 mm Hg. The short-term effects of the therapy were evaluated after 6 months: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), albuminuria, the intrarenal fibrosis biomarkers: urine excretion of transforming growth factor β-1 (TGFβ-1) and procollagen type III amino terminal propeptide (PIIINP), cardiac biomarker: serum concentration of N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), 24-hour ambulatory BP measurement, and hemoglobin and potassium concentrations.

RESULTS

At baseline the groups did not differ with respect to age, primary nephropathy, comorbidity, immunosuppressive therapy, albuminuria, and graft function. A total of 61 (L group) and 73 (ST group) patients reached the target BP and completed protocol at 6 months. After 6 months of therapy there were no significant differences in changes of eGFR, albuminuria, hemoglobin and potassium concentrations, urine excretion of PIIINP, and TGFβ-1 between groups. There was a trend in the L group to decrease the concentration of serum NT-proBNP.

CONCLUSIONS

Losartan shows minimal adverse effects and no influence on graft function and biomarkers of graft fibrosis. It may have a positive effect on cardiovascular risk in KTRs. Further interim analyses of the CELART study will be conducted.

Renal tubular cell binding of β-catenin to TCF1 versus FoxO1 is associated with chronic interstitial fibrosis in transplanted kidneys

β-Catenin is an important co-factor which binds multiple transcriptional molecules and mediates fibrogenic signaling pathways. Its role in kidney transplantation is unknown. We quantified binding of β-catenin within renal tubular epithelial cells to transcription factors, TCF1 and FoxO1, using a proximity ligation assay in 240 transplanted kidneys, and evaluated their pathological and clinical outcomes. β-Catenin/FoxO1 binding in 1-month protocol biopsies inversely correlated with contemporaneous chronic fibrosis, subsequent inflammation. and inflammatory fibrosis (P < .001). The relative binding of β-catenin/TCF1 versus β-catenin/FoxO1 (TF ratio) was the optimal biomarker, and abnormal in diverse fibrotic transplant diseases. A high 1-month TF ratio was followed by greater tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis scores, cortical inflammation, renal impairment, and proteinuria at 1 year (n = 131, all P < .001). The TF ratio was associated with reduced eGFR (AUC 0.817), mild fibrosis (AUC 0.717), and moderate fibrosis (AUC 0.769) using receiver operating characteristic analysis. An independent validation cohort (n = 76) confirmed 1-month TF was associated with 12-month moderate fibrosis (15.8% vs. 2.6%, P = .047), however, not with other outcomes or 10-year graft survival, which limits generalizabilty of these findings. In summary, differential binding of β-catenin to TCF1 rather than FoxO1 in renal tubular cells was associated with the fibrogenic response in transplanted kidneys.

Hemodynamic effects of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy vs. β-blocker monotherapy for portal hypertension in cirrhosis: A meta-analysis

β-blockers are commonly used for the treatment of acute variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone antagonists (angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and aldosterone antagonists) are potential therapies for portal hypertension. Several studies have compared the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy vs. β-blocker monotherapy, with inconsistent results. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy vs. β-blocker monotherapy for hepatic vein pressure gradient (HVPG) reduction in cirrhosis. Studies were obtained using PubMed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane library databases up to July 2015, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) in HVPG reduction was used as a measure of treatment efficacy. In total, three studies (91 patients) were included. When compared to the β-blocker monotherapy, the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy resulted in a significant HVPG reduction [WMD 1.70; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52-2.88]. However, there was no significant difference in the heart rate reduction between the monotherapy and combination therapy groups (WMD -0.11; 95% CI: -3.51-3.29). In addition, no significant difference in the hemodynamic response was observed between the two groups (WMD 1.46; 95% CI: 0.93-2.30). In conclusion, the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy reduces portal hypertension significantly and to a greater extent than β-blocker monotherapy. Both therapies reduced the heart rate to similar levels; however, the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy reduced the mean arterial pressure to a greater extent. Due to the limited number of studies included, the data available do not allow a satisfactory comparison of adverse events. Moreover, further larger-scale trials are required in order to strengthen the results of the present study.

Nephronophthisis: should we target cysts or fibrosis?

Ciliopathy nephronophthisis (NPHP), a common cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in children and young adults, is characterized by disintegration of the tubular basement membrane accompanied by irregular thickening and attenuation, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, and occasionally cortico-medullary cyst formation. Pharmacological approaches that delay the development of ESRD could potentially extend the window of therapeutic opportunity for this group of patients, generating time to find an appropriate donor or even for new treatments to mature. In this review we provide an overview of compounds that have been tested to ameliorate kidney cysts and/or fibrosis. We also revisit paclitaxel as a potential strategy to target fibrosis in NPHP. At low dosage this chemotherapy drug shows promising results in rodent models of renal fibrosis. Possible adverse events and safety of paclitaxel treatment in pediatric patients would need to be investigated, as would the efficacy, optimum dose, and administration schedule for the treatment of renal fibrosis in NPHP patients. Paclitaxel is an approved drug for human use with known pharmacokinetics, which could potentially be used in other ciliopathies through targeting the microtubule skeleton.

Pharmacogenetics may Influence Tacrolimus Daily Dose, but not Urinary Tubular Damage Markers in the Long-Term Period after Renal Transplantation

Background

The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the influence of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5 (6986A>G) and ABCB1 (3435C>T) polymorphisms on tacrolimus (TAC) dosage regimen and exposure. Second, we evaluated the influence of TAC dosage regimen and the tested polymorphisms on renal oxidative injury, as well as the urinary activities of tubular ectoenzymes in a long-term period after transplantation. Also, we aimed to determine the association between renal oxidative stress and tubular damage markers in the renal transplant patients.

Methods

The study included 72 patients who were on TAC based immunosuppression. Allele-specific PCR was used for polymorphism determination. We measured the urinary thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and reactive carbonyl derivates (RCD) in order to evaluate oxidative injury, as well as the urinary activities of ectoenzymes (N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase, aminopeptidase N and dipeptidyl peptidase IV) to evaluate tubular damage.

Results

The carriers of CYP 3A5*1 allele required statistically higher daily doses of TAC than CYP *3/*3 carriers, as well as the carriers of C allele of ABCB1 gene compared to those with TT genotype. Also, there were no differences in TBARS, RCD and the activities of ectoenzymes between the patients’ genotypes. Our results showed significant correlations between urinary TBARS and RCD and the ectoenzymes’ activities.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that CYP 3A5 and ABCB1 3435 polymorphism may affect TAC daily doses, but not the drug’s tubular toxicity. Furthermore, tubular damage may be associated with increased renal oxidative stress.

Renal allograft fibrosis: biology and therapeutic targets

Renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis is the final common pathway of progressive renal diseases. In allografts, it is assessed with tubular atrophy as interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA). IF/TA occurs in about 40% of kidney allografts at 3-6 months after transplantation, increasing to 65% at 2 years. The origin of renal fibrosis in the allograft is complex and includes donor-related factors, in particular in case of expanded criteria donors, ischemia-reperfusion injury, immune-mediated damage, recurrence of underlying diseases, hypertensive damage, nephrotoxicity of immunosuppressants, recurrent graft infections, postrenal obstruction, etc. Based largely on studies in the non-transplant setting, there is a large body of literature on the role of different cell types, be it intrinsic to the kidney or bone marrow derived, in mediating renal fibrosis, and the number of mediator systems contributing to fibrotic changes is growing steadily. Here we review the most important cellular processes and mediators involved in the progress of renal fibrosis, with a focus on the allograft situation, and discuss some of the challenges in translating experimental insights into clinical trials, in particular fibrosis biomarkers or imaging modalities.

Prevalence and management of post-transplant anemia in long-term follow-up of Chinese kidney transplant recipients: a single-center report

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant anemia (PTA) has long been a less-recognized complication in kidney transplant recipients, and its prevalence also tends to be underestimated. This study sought to evaluate the prevalence, management, and risk factors of PTA from a group of long-term follow-up Chinese kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-four adult kidney transplant recipients were followed up at Fuzhou General Hospital, China, and retrospectively studied.

RESULTS

PTA prevalence at transplant and at 5-yearly time points after transplantation were 45.5%, 10.7%, 9.6%, 14.8%, 13.5%, and 19.6%, respectively. Overall, 38.3% of patients had been anemic at least once during the follow-up period, and 42% of these patients had recurrent anemia. Correlation analysis indicated that hemoglobin levels were associated with graft function. No correlations between anemia and age, gender, immunosuppressive regimens, or antihypertensive agents were observed. Binary logistic regression analysis suggested that serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen were associated with the diagnosis of anemia at 1 year post-transplant. At 5 years post-transplant, only serum creatinine concentrations correlated with anemia. Although iron drugs are frequently used, erythropoietin was rarely administered in those anemic patients suffering poor graft function that necessitated such therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of PTA is noticeably high, and impaired kidney graft function seemed to be the major risk factor for anemia. There is an urgent need to improve current PTA management and to establish modified guidelines for this common complication in kidney transplant recipients.

The effect of amlodipine besylate, losartan potassium, olmesartan medoxomil, and other antihypertensives on central aortic blood pressure and biomarkers of vascular function

Biomarkers are being increasingly used in the study of cardiovascular disease because they provide readily quantifiable surrogate endpoints and allow accurate assessment of the effects of therapy on particular pathological processes. However, in order to be useful, biomarkers must be relevant, predictable, accurate, and reproducible. There is compelling evidence from large-scale clinical trials that inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system [angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin type II receptor blockers (ARBs)] and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) may have beneficial effects beyond blood pressure control in the treatment of hypertension. Biomarkers are expected to provide further insight into these beneficial effects and allow for quantitative assessment. This review summarizes the published clinical evidence on the effects of various antihypertensive drugs, particularly ARBs (e.g. losartan and olmesartan medoxomil) and CCBs (e.g. amlodipine), alone and in combination with other agents (e.g. hydrochlorothiazide), on central aortic pressure and the biomarkers high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), adiponectin, cystatin C, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), procollagen, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukin-6. Of these biomarkers, the benefits of antihypertensive therapy on hsCRP, adiponectin, and HOMA-IR reflect a potential for quantifiable long-term vascular benefits.

Use of kidney function end points in kidney transplant trials: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials in kidney transplantation are beginning to include markers of kidney function as end points now that traditional outcomes, such as acute rejection, become increasingly rare events. The frequency and type of kidney function end points used are unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTING & POPULATION

Randomized controlled trials in adult kidney transplant recipients reported in 5 major general medical journals and 5 major subspecialty journals in nephrology and transplantation between January 2003 and November 2008.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Inclusion of at least one kidney function end point at least 1 month posttransplant.

RESULTS

133 (79%) of 169 randomized trials identified used a kidney function end point. Of these, 37 (28%) used one or more measures of kidney function as the primary end point, and 81 (61%), as a secondary end point. For the primary end point, 21 (57%) trials used a creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), 18 (49%) used serum creatinine level, and 7 (19%) used measured GFR. Overall, eGFR was an end point in 81 (61%) trials, and measured GFR, in 12 (9%) trials.

LIMITATIONS

This review is limited by the poor quality of the included trials, with many not defining either primary or secondary end points.

CONCLUSIONS

Measures of kidney function are used commonly as surrogate end points in kidney transplant trials, with eGFR becoming more frequently used over time. Further data are needed to properly validate these surrogate end points and fully understand their limitations when designing and interpreting randomized trials.

Effect of angiotensin II type-1 receptor blockers on stable allograft kidneys: prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVE

Is assess the effects of angiotensin II type-I receptor blockers on outcomes in renal transplant recipients without proteinuria or posttransplantation erythrocytosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty renal transplant recipients (30 men and 20 women, with a mean [SD] age of 40 [13] years) were randomized into 2 groups of 25 patients each; 1 group was treated with losartan for 1 year, and the other was not (control group). Blood pressure and other biochemical parameters were measured at baseline and at 6 and 12 months posttransplantation.

RESULTS

After 1 year, the losartan group had significantly lower systolic blood pressure (113 [22] mm Hg vs 126 [18] mm Hg; P = .04) and hemoglobin concentration (12.8 [1.9] g/dL vs 14.5 [2.1] g/dL; P = .006) and significantly higher serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration (58 [22] mg/dL vs 47 [10] mg/dL; P = .03) compared with the control group; however the incidence of anemia did not differ (37% vs 20%; P = .20). In the losartan group, there were significant changes in hemoglobin concentration between baseline and 6 months (14.5 [1.6] g/dL vs 12.9 [1.49] g/dL; P < .001), but not between 6 and 12 months (12.9 [1.49] g/dL vs 12.8 [1.96] g/dL; P = .43). After 1 year, there were no significant between-group differences in diastolic hypertension, serum creatinine concentration, creatinine clearance, and serum potassium, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, and uric acid concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Losartan significantly increased high-density lipoprotein concentration and significantly decreased systolic hypertension. Although losartan decreased the hemoglobin concentration during the first 6 months, its effect did not progress with longer use. To determine the effect of losartan on renal function, additional studies with longer follow-up are needed.

The renin-angiotensin system: an old, newly discovered player in immunoregulation

Clinical and experimental studies that discuss the different immune functions of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in kidney diseases were reviewed, with emphasis on studies of kidney transplantation. The RAS has been shown to affect both the innate and adaptive immune responses and has a well-established role in fibrinogenesis. Of special clinical interest is the ability of the RAS to activate the transforming growth factor beta(1) and the Smad pathways leading to fibrinogenesis. In addition to the RAS enhancing effect on the activity of T cells, several components of the RAS have also been shown to be chemotactic to macrophages, T cells, and natural killer cells. Experimental studies have found that RAS blockade decreases the histologic lesions of chronic allograft nephropathy but can enhance acute graft vasculopathy. Although the blockade of RAS has been commonly practiced to reduce posttransplantation hypertension, proteinuria, and erythrocytosis, however, its role in prolonging graft survival is not well established.

Antihypertensive treatment for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

In some nontransplant populations, effects of different antihypertensive drug classes vary. Relative effects in kidney transplant recipients are uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess comparative effects of different classes of antihypertensive agents in kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, conference proceedings and reference lists of identified studies were searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of any antihypertensive agent applied to kidney transplant recipients for at least two weeks were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted by two investigators independently. Study quality, transplant outcomes and other patient centred outcomes were assessed using random effects meta-analysis. Risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, both with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Stratified analyses and meta-regression were used to investigate heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 60 studies, enrolling 3802 recipients. Twenty-nine studies (2262 participants) compared calcium channel blockers (CCB) to placebo/no treatment, 10 studies (445 participants) compared angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) to placebo/no treatment and seven studies (405 participants) compared CCB to ACEi. CCB compared to placebo/no treatment (plus additional agents in either arm as required) reduced graft loss (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.99) and improved glomerular filtration rate (GFR), (MD, 4.45 mL/min, 95% CI 2.22 to 6.68). Data on ACEi versus placebo/no treatment were inconclusive for GFR (MD -8.07 mL/min, 95% CI -18.57 to 2.43), and variable for graft loss, precluding meta-analysis. In direct comparison with CCB, ACEi decreased GFR (MD -11.48 mL/min, 95% CI -5.75 to -7.21), proteinuria (MD -0.28 g/24 h, 95% CI -0.47 to -0.10), haemoglobin (MD -12.96 g/L, 95% CI -5.72 to -10.21) and increased hyperkalaemia (RR 3.74, 95% CI 1.89 to 7.43). Graft loss data were inconclusive (RR 7.37, 95% CI 0.39 to 140.35). Other drug comparisons were compared in small numbers of participants and studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that CCB may be preferred as first line agents for hypertensive kidney transplant recipients. ACEi have some detrimental effects in kidney transplant recipients. More high quality studies reporting patient centred outcomes are required.

Dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system with high-dose angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor for nephroprotection: an open, controlled, randomized study

OBJECTIVE

Despite the proven effectiveness of combination therapy with an angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARBs) for the prevention and treatment of kidney disease, it has not proved possible to inhibit the progress of chronic nephropathies completely. To improve renal outcome one may consider using increased dosages of ACEI above those usually recommended for hypertension.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A randomized, open, controlled study was conducted to evaluate the influence of two combination therapies on proteinuria, markers of tubular injury and renal fibrosis. A total of 18 patients with a creatinine level of 109+/-36 micromol/l and proteinuria of 0.97+/-0.76 g/24 h were enrolled in the study. In the 8-week run-in period, an ACEI (cilazapril 5 mg once-daily) and an ARB (telmisartan 80 mg once-daily) were administered to achieve the target blood pressure of < or = 130/80 mmHg. Next, the patients were randomly assigned to either an increased dose of cilazapril (10 mg) or the previous dose (5 mg) in two active-treatment periods, each lasting 8 weeks.

RESULTS

A significant increase in renin activity was observed after administration of cilazapril 10 mg (6.46+/-1.12 vs 4.67+/-0.7 ng/ml/h; p=0.028). Proteinuria, urine excretion of N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, and alpha1-microglobulin and amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen were unchanged.

CONCLUSION

An increased dosage of cilazapril (twice the maximum recommended dose) in addition to combination therapy with telmisartan was associated with increased blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, with no additional effect on proteinuria, markers of tubular injury or renal fibrosis.

Chronic allograft nephropathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite dramatic declines in acute rejection and early graft failure, long-term outcomes after kidney transplantation have improved little during the past 25 years. Most late allograft failure is attributed to chronic allograft nephropathy, but this is a clinicopathological description and not a diagnosis, and its pathogenesis and treatment are largely unknown.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies suggest that acute rejection during the first few months, and calcineurin inhibitor toxicity thereafter, may both contribute to chronic allograft nephropathy. There is also accumulating evidence that injury from antibody-mediated rejection may play an important pathogenic role in at least some patients with chronic allograft nephropathy, particularly those with transplant glomerulopathy. Therapeutic measures, including protocols to reduce calcineurin inhibitor exposure, remain largely unproven.

SUMMARY

Understanding why so many kidney allografts fail, despite effective preventive measures for early acute rejection, is one of the most important areas of research in kidney transplantation today.