Combined double lung-liver transplantation for cystic fibrosis without cardio-pulmonary by-pass

First in Poland Simultaneous Liver-Lung Transplantation With Liver-First Approach for Recipient Due to Cystic Fibrosis: A Case Report

Cystic fibrosis is an autosomal progressive disease affecting the lung, pancreas, and liver. Some patients develop end-stage respiratory and liver failure. For such patients, combined lung-liver transplantation remains the only therapeutic option. In this article we present the first simultaneous lung-liver transplantation in Poland, as well as in Central and Eastern Europe, with detailed clinical history, surgical aspects, and postoperative course.

Machine Perfusion of Donation After Circulatory Death Liver and Lungs Before Combined Liver-lung Transplantation

Shortage of deceased donor organs for transplantation has led to the increased use of organs from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors. There are currently no reports describing outcomes after multiorgan transplantation with DCD livers. The use of DCD organs for multiorgan transplantation can be enhanced if the detrimental effects of prolonged cold ischemia and subsequent ischemia-reperfusion injury are overcome. We present a case in which the liver and lungs of a DCD donor were preserved using ex situ machine perfusion for combined liver-lung transplantation. The recipient was a 19-year-old male patient requiring bilateral lung transplantation for severe progressive pleural parenchymal fibroelastosis and portal hypertension with portal vein thrombosis. The donor liver was preserved with dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion, whereas the lungs were perfused using ex vivo lung perfusion. With ex vivo lung perfusion, total preservation time of right and left lung reached 17 and 21 h, respectively. Now, 2 y after transplantation, liver function is normal and lung function is improving. To conclude, we suggest that combined transplantation of DCD liver and lungs is feasible when cold ischemia is reduced with ex situ machine perfusion preservation.

A review of liver dysfunction in the lung transplant patient

Liver dysfunction is an increasingly common finding in patients evaluated for lung transplantation. New or worsening dysfunction in the perioperative period, defined by presence of clinical ascites/encephalopathy, high model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and/or independent diagnostic criteria, is associated with high short- and long-term mortality. Therefore, a thorough liver function assessment is necessary prior to listing for lung transplant. Unfortunately, identification and intraoperative monitoring remain the only options for prevention of disease progression with isolated lung transplantation. Combined lung and liver transplantation may provide an option for definitive long-term management in selecting patients with known liver disease at high risk for postoperative progression. However, experience with the combined operation is extremely limited and indications for combined lung and liver transplant remain unclear. Herein, we present a comprehensive literature review of patients with liver dysfunction undergoing lung transplantation with and without concurrent liver transplant in an effort to illuminate the risks, benefits, and clinical judgement surrounding decision to pursue combined lung-liver transplantation (CLLT). We also argue description of liver function is currently a weakness of the current lung allocation scoring system. Additional algorithms incorporating liver function may aid in risk stratification and decision to pursue combined transplantation.

Survival following simultaneous liver-lung versus liver alone transplantation: Results of the US National experience

BACKGROUND

There are little data to compare the post-transplant survival between lung-liver transplant (LLT) and liver-alone recipients. This study was undertaken to compare survival between LLT and liver-alone transplant.

METHODS

UNOS data for patients undergoing LLT from 2002 to 2017 was analyzed. LLT recipients (n = 81) were matched 1:4 to liver-alone recipients (n = 324) by propensity score and patient survival was compared in the matched cohorts.

RESULTS

Unadjusted 1, 3, and 5-year patient survival in the matched cohort was significantly worse in the LLT (82.5%, 72.2%, and 62.2%) versus liver-alone (92.2%, 82.8%, and 80.9%; p = 0.005). This difference persisted after adjusting for covariates with residual imbalance (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.37-3.08; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

LLT has significantly worse survival than liver-alone transplant. With an increasing organ shortage, medical necessity criteria such as those developed for simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation should be developed for simultaneous lung-liver transplants to assure liver allografts are only allocated when truly needed.

A Propensity-matched Survival Analysis: Do Simultaneous Liver-lung Transplant Recipients Need a Liver?

BACKGROUND

There is debate whether simultaneous lung-liver transplant (LLT) long-term outcomes warrant allocation of 2 organs to a single recipient. We hypothesized that LLT recipients would have improved posttransplant survival compared with matched single-organ lung recipients with an equivalent degree of liver dysfunction.

METHODS

The Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing STAR file was queried for adult candidates for LLT and isolated lung transplantation from 2006 to 2016. Waitlist mortality and transplant odds were calculated for all candidates. Donor and recipient demographic characteristics were compiled and compared. The LLT recipients were matched 1:2 with a nearest neighbor method to single-organ lung recipients. Kaplan-Meier methods with log-rank test compared long-term survival between groups. Univariate regression was used to calculate the association of LLT and mortality within 6 months of transplant. A proportional hazards model was used to calculate risk-adjusted mortality after 6 months posttransplantation.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight LLT patients were matched to 75 single-organ lung recipients. After matching, no differences in baseline demographics or liver function were observed between cohorts. Length of stay was significantly longer in LLT recipients compared to isolated lung recipients (45.89 days vs 22.44 days, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in survival probability between LLT and isolated lung transplant (1 y, 89.5% vs 86.7%; 5 y, 67.0% vs 64.6%; P = 0.20).

CONCLUSIONS

After matching for patient characteristics and level of liver dysfunction, survival in simultaneous LLT was comparable to isolated lung transplantation. Although this population is unique, the clinical picture prompting liver transplant is not clear. National guidelines to better elucidate patient selection are needed.

Single-Center Long-Term Analysis of Combined Liver-Lung Transplant Outcomes

Background

Combined lung-liver transplantation (LLT) applies 2 technically challenging transplants in 1 patient with severe 2-organ failure.

Methods

Institutional medical records and United Network for Organ Sharing database were queried for patients at our institution that underwent LLT from 2000 to 2016.

Results

Twelve LLTs were performed from 2000 to 2016 including 9 male and 3 female recipients with a median age of 28.36 years. Indications for lung transplantation were cystic fibrosis (8), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (3), and pulmonary fibrosis secondary to hepatopulmonary syndrome (1). Indications for liver transplantation were cystic fibrosis (8), alcoholic cirrhosis (1), idiopathic cirrhosis (2), and alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (1). Median forced expiratory volume in 1 second at transplant was 27.8% (±20.38%), and mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease was 10.5 (±4.68). Median hospital stay was 44.5 days. Seventy-five percent of recipients had 1+ new infection during their transplant hospitalization. Patients experienced 0.68 incidences of acute rejection per year with a 41.7% (95% confidence interval, 21.3%-81.4%) probability of freedom from rejection in the first-year. Patient survival was 100% at 30 days, 91.6% at 1 year, and 71.3% at 3 years. At the time of analysis, 7 of 12 patients were alive, of whom 3 survived over 8 years post-LLT. Causes of death were primary liver graft failure (1), bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (2), and solid tumor malignancies (2).

Conclusions

Our results indicate that LLT is associated with comparable survival to other LLT series and provides a granular assessment of infectious and rejection rates in this rare population.

Low-Flow Veno-Venous Extracorporeal CO2 Removal: First Clinical Experience in Lung Transplant Recipients

Background

Low-flow extracorporeal CO2 removal devices are easy to setup and manage and may provide valuable ventilation support.

Methods

We employed a new device (ProLUNG) recently introduced into the clinical arsenal that exploits a simple hemoperfusion technique sustained by blood flows lower than 500 ml/min to remove CO2 from the venous blood. It was used as an adjunctive support to mechanical ventilation during and after four lung transplantations in our center.

Results

Two patients with cystic fibrosis, one with pulmonary fibrosis, and one with emphysema were included. They underwent lung transplantation and presented hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis before, during, or after the surgical procedure. After 1 h of treatment with the ProLUNG circuit, all patients showed reduced CO2 levels and increased pH; these variables remained stable until the end of treatment.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that this new device is effective in removing CO2 and stabilizing the pH.

Practical guidelines: lung transplantation in patients with cystic fibrosis

There are no European recommendations on issues specifically related to lung transplantation (LTX) in cystic fibrosis (CF). The main goal of this paper is to provide CF care team members with clinically relevant CF-specific information on all aspects of LTX, highlighting areas of consensus and controversy throughout Europe. Bilateral lung transplantation has been shown to be an important therapeutic option for end-stage CF pulmonary disease. Transplant function and patient survival after transplantation are better than in most other indications for this procedure. Attention though has to be paid to pretransplant morbidity, time for referral, evaluation, indication, and contraindication in children and in adults. This review makes extensive use of specific evidence in the field of lung transplantation in CF patients and addresses all issues of practical importance. The requirements of pre-, peri-, and postoperative management are discussed in detail including bridging to transplant and postoperative complications, immune suppression, chronic allograft dysfunction, infection, and malignancies being the most important. Among the contributors to this guiding information are 19 members of the ECORN-CF project and other experts. The document is endorsed by the European Cystic Fibrosis Society and sponsored by the Christiane Herzog Foundation.

Portopulmonary hypertension as an indication for combined heart, lung, and liver or lung and liver transplantation: literature review and case presentation

End-stage liver disease with severe portopulmonary hypertension (PPHTN), which is refractory to vasodilator therapies, is a contraindication for isolated liver transplantation (LT) because of the high mortality rate. Combined heart, lung, and liver transplantation (CHLLT) and combined lung and liver transplantation (CLLT) can be lifesaving options for these patients; however, these procedures have rarely been performed. A 52-year-old man had end-stage liver disease due to hepatitis C and PPHTN; the latter showed a suboptimal response to pulmonary vasodilator therapy with continuous intravenous treprostinil sodium and oral sildenafil citrate and was considered a contraindication to isolated LT. His preoperative left ventricular function was normal, and he had mild to moderate right ventricular dysfunction. He underwent CLLT, which consisted of sequential double-lung transplantation under cardiopulmonary bypass followed by standard LT under venovenous bypass. Re-exploration of the chest cavity was necessary because of bleeding, and respiratory failure developed; however, the patient recovered, was discharged home on day 26, and remained well 1 year after CLLT with the standard immunosuppressants (similar to those used for heart and lung transplantation). For PPHTN, combined thoracic organ and liver transplantation has been reported in only 10 patients. Six of these patients, including our case, underwent CLLT, whereas 4 patients underwent CHLLT. Notably, 2 of the 6 CLLT patients expired within 24 hours of transplantation because of acute right heart failure. CHLLT should be considered for patients with refractory PPHTN. The assessment of preoperative cardiac function is a vital part of the decision to include heart transplantation in CLLT.

Lung transplantation for cystic fibrosis

Lung transplantation is a complex, high-risk, potentially life-saving therapy for the end-stage lung disease of cystic fibrosis (CF). The decision to pursue transplantation involves comparing the likelihood of survival with and without transplantation as well as assessing the effect of wait-listing and transplantation on the patient's quality of life. Although recent population-based analyses of the US lung allocation system for the CF population have raised controversies about the survival benefits of transplantation, studies from the United Kingdom and Canada have suggested a definite survival advantage for those receiving transplants. In response to these and other controversies, leaders in transplantation and CF met together in Lansdowne, Virginia, to consider the state of the art in lung transplantation for CF in an international context, focusing on advances in surgical technique, measurement of outcomes, use of prognostic criteria, variations in local control over listing, and prioritization among the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and The Netherlands, patient adherence before and after transplantation and other issues in the broader context of lung transplantation. Finally, the conference members carefully considered how efforts to improve outcomes for lung transplantation for CF lung disease might best be studied. This Roundtable seeks to communicate the substance of our discussions.