Impact of donor left ventricular hypertrophy on survival after heart transplant

Reasons for donor heart offer refusal are often unrelated to the donor itself - when, why, and the "weekend effect"

BACKGROUND

Most donor hearts offered for heart transplant (HT) in the United States (US) are turned down. We aimed to understand the reasons for this - focusing on those related to the potential recipient and HT center (i.e., donor-unrelated reasons for refusal).

METHODS

The Donor Heart Study (DHS) enrolled 4,333 adult potential heart donors in US from 2015 to 2020. Separately by donor, each HT center who refused an offer for that donor was surveyed on their reason(s) for refusal. We measured the prevalences of 18 distinct donor-unrelated reasons for refusal and their association with the timing of offers (weekend vs. weekday).

RESULTS

Our analytic sample included 14,132 unique surveys, each representing a declined offer for one of 3,083 donors (mean per donor: 2.56; range: 1-17). Donor-unrelated reasons were cited in 24.3% (n = 3,441) of surveys; among these, recipient issues (i.e., "recipient ill) were most common (cited in 7%) while resource-related issues (e.g., "logistics", "surgeon unavailable") were rare (<1%). Neither showed a significant time trend; however, other reasons ("already considering another offer", "distance too far") did so, with an abrupt uptick after 2018. We found that several donor-related (but no donor-unrelated) reasons for refusal (e.g., left ventricular hypertrophy, social risk behaviors) were significantly more common on weekends. Their "weekend-predominance" was not explained by differences in objective donor characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly one quarter of donor heart offer refusals are due to donor-unrelated reasons. Weekend-predominant reasons for offer refusal signal the highly subjective nature of donor assessment and warrant further scrutiny.

Donor age and ischemic time in heart transplantation - implications for organ preservation

BACKGROUND

The Organ Care System and Non-ischemic Heart Preservation methods have emerged as significant advancements in heart transplantation, designed to mitigate ischemic injury and extend preservation times. However, their high costs and logistical complexities necessitate strategic utilization.

METHODS

We evaluated data from 83,761 heart transplants registered in the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation registry from 1988 to 2018. Utilizing a Cox proportional hazards model, we explored the influence of donor age and ischemic time on transplant survival. A key innovation of our study is the development of a nomogram to predict post-transplant survival, incorporating both traditional and advanced statistical methods.

RESULTS

The median age of recipients was 52 years (22% female) and 33 years (31% female) for donors. Analysis revealed a median ischemic time of 3 hours and median survival of 11.5 years across the cohort. The nomogram showed a decline in survival probabilities with increasing donor age, notably from age 40 and more significantly with ischemic times >4 hours. Ischemic times ≥4 hours versus <2 hours were associated with hazard ratio (HR) of 1.2 (95% CI, 1.1-1.3) for donors aged 40-59, a disparity that escalated for donors aged ≥60 (HR: 2.0; 95% CI, 1.5-2.7).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the importance of careful donor selection and indicates that certain groups, particularly older donors with prolonged ischemic times, might benefit from ex-vivo preservation techniques. The developed nomogram offers a practical tool for clinicians, enhancing decision-making by providing detailed insights into the relationship between donor age, ischemic time, and post-transplant mortality.

Donor Selection for Heart Transplantation in 2025

The number of candidates on the waiting list for heart transplantation (HT) continues to far outweigh the number of available organs, and the donor heart nonuse rate in the United States remains significantly higher than that of other regions such as Europe. Although predicting outcomes in HT remains challenging, our overall understanding of the factors that play a role in post-HT outcomes continues to grow. We observe that many donor risk factors that are deemed "high-risk" do not necessarily always adversely affect post-HT outcomes, but are in fact nuanced and interact with other donor and recipient risk factors. The field of HT continues to evolve, with ongoing development of technologies for organ preservation during transport, expansion of the practice of donation after circulatory death, and proposed changes to organ allocation policy. As such, the field must continue to refine its processes for donor selection and risk prediction in HT.

Revolutionizing Donor Heart Procurement: Innovations and Future Directions for Enhanced Transplantation Outcomes

Heart failure persists as a critical public health challenge, with heart transplantation esteemed as the optimal treatment for patients with end-stage heart failure. However, the limited availability of donor hearts presents a major obstacle to meeting patient needs. In recent years, the most groundbreaking progress in heart transplantation has been in donor heart procurement, significantly expanding the donor pool and enhancing clinical outcomes. This review comprehensively examines these advancements, including the resurgence of heart donation after circulatory death and innovative recovery and evaluation technologies such as normothermic machine perfusion and thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion. Additionally, novel preservation methods, including controlled hypothermic preservation and hypothermic oxygenated perfusion, are evaluated. The review also explores the use of extended-criteria donors, post-cardiopulmonary resuscitation donors, and high-risk donors, all contributing to increased donor availability without compromising outcomes. Future directions, such as xenotransplantation, biomarkers, and artificial intelligence in donor heart evaluation and procurement, are discussed. These innovations promise to address current limitations and optimize donor heart utilization, ultimately enhancing transplantation success. By identifying recent advancements and proposing future research directions, this review aims to provide insights into advancing heart transplantation and improving patient outcomes.

Relationship between donor ejection fraction, left ventricular wall thickness and mortality in heart transplants recipients

This study explored the impact of donor left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and left ventricular wall thickness (LVWT) on mortality among heart transplant (HTx) recipients. Utilizing data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry, adult HTx recipients between 2006-2022 were analyzed. Patients were categorized into four groups based on donor EF(>50 % or ≤50 %) and LVWT(<1.4 cm or ≥1.4 cm). 21,012 patients were included. There were significant differences in baseline characteristics among the groups. Unadjusted mortality was 6.3 %, 6.0 %, 6.0 %, and 2.4 %(p=0.86) at 30-days; 16.2 %, 13.5 %, 16.8 %, and 7.3 %(p=0.08) at 1-year; and 32.2 %, 29.2 %, 35.4 %, and 29.0 %(p=0.18) at 5-years, respectively. In addition, adjusted mortality did not differ across the groups. There were no significant differences in recipient mortality in groups based on donor EF and LVWT. Expanding the donor selection criteria would allow for increase in the donor pool and assist in decreasing the mortality, while on the waitlist for HTx.

Impact of donor ventricular function on heart transplantation outcomes

BACKGROUND

Some heart transplant (HTx) centers have expanded their donor eligibility criteria in response to the organ shortage; one area of active interest involves utilizing hearts with ventricular dysfunction. Our study seeks to identify if a relationship exists between donor left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and ischemic time or donor age on HTx outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis on adult patients who had a HTx between 1996 and 2021 (n = 46,936). Donor LVEF (dLVEF) values were categorized into three groups: <50%, 50%-70%, and >70%. Ischemic time and donor age were stratified into four groups: ≤2.0, 2.1-3.0, 3.1-4.0, >4.0 h, and ≤30, 31-40, 41-50, >50 years, respectively. The outcome of interest was long-term survival.

RESULTS

Multivariable survival analysis found a slight increase in overall mortality risk for patients with donor ejection fractions <50% (HR = 1.16, p = .013). However, subsequent subgroup investigation discovered that this elevated hazard was only applicable when ischemic time was prolonged to >3.0 h (3.1-4.0 h: HR = 1.23, p = .024; > 4.0 h: HR = 1.52, p < .001). There was no significant difference in survival between dLVEF groups when ischemic time was limited to ≤3.0 h or when stratified by donor age.

CONCLUSION

HTx patients with a low donor ejection fraction have comparable survival to recipients with a normal dLVEF when ischemic time is limited to ≤3.0 h. Reduced dLVEF does not appear to be sensitive to advanced donor age. The clinical implications of our study may encourage the recruitment of more donor hearts for transplantation.

Donor heart selection: Evidence-based guidelines for providers

The proposed donor heart selection guidelines provide evidence-based and expert-consensus recommendations for the selection of donor hearts following brain death. These recommendations were compiled by an international panel of experts based on an extensive literature review.

Primary Graft Dysfunction after Heart Transplantation - Unravelling the Enigma

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains the main cause of early mortality following heart transplantation despite several advances in donor preservation techniques and therapeutic strategies for PGD. With that aim of establishing the aetiopathogenesis of PGD and the preferred management strategies, the new consensus definition has paved the way for multiple contemporaneous studies to be undertaken and accurately compared. This review aims to provide a broad-based understanding of the pathophysiology, clinical presentation and management of PGD.

Heart transplantation: focus on donor recovery strategies, left ventricular assist devices, and novel therapies

Heart transplantation is advocated in selected patients with advanced heart failure in the absence of contraindications. Principal challenges in heart transplantation centre around an insufficient and underutilized donor organ pool, the need to individualize titration of immunosuppressive therapy, and to minimize late complications such as cardiac allograft vasculopathy, malignancy, and renal dysfunction. Advances have served to increase the organ donor pool by advocating the use of donors with underlying hepatitis C virus infection and by expanding the donor source to use hearts donated after circulatory death. New techniques to preserve the donor heart over prolonged ischaemic times, and enabling longer transport times in a safe manner, have been introduced. Mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation has allowed patients with advanced heart failure to avoid progressive deterioration in hepato-renal function while awaiting an optimal donor organ match. The management of the heart transplantation recipient remains a challenge despite advances in immunosuppression, which provide early gains in rejection avoidance but are associated with infections and late-outcome challenges. In this article, we review contemporary advances and challenges in this field to focus on donor recovery strategies, left ventricular assist devices, and immunosuppressive monitoring therapies with the potential to enhance outcomes. We also describe opportunities for future discovery to include a renewed focus on long-term survival, which continues to be an area that is under-studied and poorly characterized, non-human sources of organs for transplantation including xenotransplantation as well as chimeric transplantation, and technology competitive to human heart transplantation, such as tissue engineering.

Evolving Characteristics of Heart Transplantation Donors and Recipients: JACC Focus Seminar

Although the burden of end-stage heart failure continues to increase, the number of available organs for heart transplantation (HT) remains inadequate. The HT community has been challenged to find ways to expand the number of donor hearts available. Recent advances include use of hearts from donors infected with hepatitis C virus as well as other previously underutilized donors, including those with left ventricular dysfunction, of older age, and with a history of cocaine use. Concurrently, emerging trends in HT surgery include donation after circulatory death, ex vivo normothermic heart perfusion, and controlled hypothermic preservation, which may enable procurement of organs from farther distances and prevent early allograft dysfunction. Contemporary HT recipients have also evolved in light of the 2018 revision to the U.S. heart allocation policy. This focus seminar discusses recent trends in donor and recipient phenotypes and management strategies for successful HT, as well as evolving areas and future directions.

Impact of using higher-risk donor hearts for candidates with pre-transplant mechanical circulatory support

BACKGROUND

We evaluated post-heart transplant (HTx) outcomes after use of higher-risk donor hearts for candidates supported with pre-HTx mechanical circulatory support (MCS).

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis of the national United Network for Organ Sharing registry, a total of 9,915 adult candidates on MCS underwent HTx from January 1, 2010 to March 31, 2019. Multi-organ, re-transplant, and congenital heart disease patients were excluded. Higher-risk donor organs met at least one of the following criteria: left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, donor to recipient predicted heart mass ratio <0.86, donor age >55 years, or ischemic time >4 hours. Primary outcome was 1 year post-transplant survival.

RESULTS

Among HTx recipients, 3688 (37.2%) received higher-risk donor hearts. Candidates supported with pre-HTx extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or biventricular assist device (n = 374, 3.8%) who received higher-risk donor hearts had comparable 1 year survival (HR: 1.14, 95% CI: [0.67-1.93], p = 0.64) to recipients of standard-risk donor hearts, when adjusted for recipient age and sex. In candidates supported with intra-aortic balloon pump (n = 1391, 14.6%), transplantation of higher-risk donor hearts did not adversely affect 1 year survival (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: [0.52-1.22], p = 0.30). Patients on durable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) who received higher-risk donor hearts had comparable 1 year survival to continued LVAD support on the waitlist, but mortality was increased compared to those who received standard-risk donor hearts (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: [1.11-1.70], p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients requiring pre-HTx temporary MCS who received higher-risk donor hearts had comparable 1 year post-transplant survival to those who received standard-risk donor hearts. Stable patients on durable LVADs may benefit from waiting for standard-risk donor hearts.

Association of donor hypertension and outcomes in orthotopic heart transplantation

The present study examined the impact of donor hypertension on recipient survival and offer acceptance practices in the United States. This was a retrospective study of all patients undergoing OHT from 1995 to 2019 using the United Network for Organ Sharing and Potential Transplant Recipient file databases. Hypertensive donors were stratified by Short (0-5 years) and Prolonged (> 5 years) hypertension. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze offer acceptance practices while Cox proportional-hazards models were used to compare mortality across groups. Of 38,338 heart transplants meeting study criteria, 5662 were procured from hypertensive donors (69% Short and 31% Prolonged). After adjustment, Prolonged donor hypertension was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio, HR, 1.31, 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.04-1.64), while recipients of Short donors experienced no decrement in post-transplant survival. Both Short and Prolonged hypertension were independently associated with decreased odds of offer acceptance (odds ratio, OR .92 95%CI: .88-.96 and OR .93 95%CI: .88-.99, respectively). While prolonged untreated hypertension in OHT donors is associated with a slight decrement in recipient survival, donors with ≤5 years of hypertension yielded similar outcomes. Donor hypertension was associated with reduced organ offer acceptance, highlighting a potential source of organ underutilization.

Left-ventricular hypertrophy in 18-month-old donor rat hearts was not associated with graft dysfunction in the early phase of reperfusion after cardiac transplantation-gene expression profiling

The use of hearts with left-ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) could offer an opportunity to extend the donor pool for cardiac transplantation. We assessed the effects of LVH in 18-month-old spontaneously hypertensive stroke-prone (SHRSP) donor rats and following transplantation. In donors, cardiac function and structural alterations were assessed. Then, the hearts were transplanted into young normotensive-rats. We evaluated LV graft function 1 h after transplantation. The myocardial expression of 92 genes involved in apoptosis, inflammation, and oxidative-stress was profiled using PCR-array. Compared to controls, SHRSP-rats developed LVH, had increased LV systolic performance (slope of the end-diastolic pressure-volume (PV) relationship: 1.6±0.2 vs 0.8±0.1mmHg/μl, p<0.05) accompanied by diastolic dysfunction [prolonged time constant of LV pressure decay (Tau: 15.8±0.6 vs 12.3±0.5ms) and augmented diastolic stiffness (LV end-diastolic PV relationship: 0.103±0.012 vs 0.045±0.006mmHg/ml), p<0.05]. They presented ECG changes, myocardial fibrosis, and increased nitrotyrosine immunoreactivity and plasma troponin-T and creatine kinase-CM levels. After transplantation, even though the graft contractility was better in SHRSP rats compared to controls, the adverse impact of ischemia/reperfusion-injury on contractility was not altered (Ees ratio after versus before transplantation: 32% vs 29%, p>0.05). Whereas nitrotyrosine immunoreactivity was higher, myeloperoxidase-positive cell infiltration was decreased in the SHRSP+transplanted compared to control+transplanted. Among the tested genes, LVH was associated with altered expression of 38 genes in donors, while transplantation of these hearts resulted in the change of four genes. Alterations in 18-month-old donor hearts, as a consequence of hypertension and LVH, were not associated with graft dysfunction in the early phase of reperfusion after transplantation.

New Approaches to Donor Selection and Preparation in Heart Transplantation

Purpose of review

With increasing survival of patients with stage D heart failure, the demand for heart transplantation has increased. The supply of donor hearts remains relatively limited. Strategies have been investigated and new technologies have been developed to expand the current donor pool. These new approaches will be discussed herein.

Recent findings

Donor hearts are often considered “marginal” due to risk factors such as older age, size mismatch with the intended recipient, prolonged ischemic time, presence of left ventricular hypertrophy, and hepatitis B/C infection. We reviewed recent data regarding the use of donor hearts with these risk factors and suggest ways to safely liberalize current donor heart acceptance criteria. New technologies such as temperature-controlled transport systems and ex vivo cardiac perfusion methods have also demonstrated promising short-term and intermediate outcomes as compared with routine cold storage, by promoting heart preservation and enabling heart procurement from remote sites with shorter cold ischemic time. Recent use of hearts from donation after circulatory death donors has demonstrated comparable outcomes to conventional donation after brain death, which can further expand the current donor pool.

Summary

Careful selection of “marginal” donor hearts, use of ex vivo cardiac perfusion, and acceptance of hearts after circulatory death may expand our current cardiac donor pool with comparable outcomes to conventional donor selection and preparation methods.

Effects of donor cause of death, ischemia time, inotrope exposure, troponin values, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic data on recipient outcomes: A review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Heart transplantation has become standard of care for pediatric patients with either end-stage heart failure or inoperable congenital heart defects. Despite increasing surgical complexity and overall volume, however, annual transplant rates remain largely unchanged. Data demonstrating pediatric donor heart refusal rates of 50% suggest optimizing donor utilization is critical. This review evaluated the impact of donor characteristics surrounding the time of death on pediatric heart transplant recipient outcomes.

METHODS

An extensive literature review was performed to identify articles focused on donor characteristics surrounding the time of death and their impact on pediatric heart transplant recipient outcomes.

RESULTS

Potential pediatric heart transplant recipient institutions commonly receive data from seven different donor death-related categories with which to determine organ acceptance: cause of death, need for CPR, serum troponin, inotrope exposure, projected donor ischemia time, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic results. Although DITs up to 8 hours have been reported with comparable recipient outcomes, most data support minimizing this period to <4 hours. CVA as a cause of death may be associated with decreased recipient survival but is rare in the pediatric population. Otherwise, however, in the setting of an acceptable donor heart with a normal echocardiogram, none of the other data categories surrounding donor death negatively impact pediatric heart transplant recipient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Echocardiographic evaluation is the most important donor clinical information following declaration of brain death provided to potential recipient institutions. Considering its relative importance, every effort should be made to allow direct image visualization.

[Left ventricle myocardium hypertrophy of donor heart: the results and outlook]

Left ventricular hypertrophy - is one of the most frequent structural changes in the heart. This article is devoted to the assessment of modern views on the causes of myocardial hypertrophy of the donor heart, indications and contraindications for the heart trans‑ plantation, the outlook of expanding the pool of effective donors through the use of these hearts. Here are considered the issues of post-transplantation remodeling of the donor heart myocardium, The pathogenesis features, the nascence risk and possibilities of drug regulation of the transplanted heart's myocardial hypertrophy of the left ventricle.

Primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation: a thorn amongst the roses

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains the leading cause of early mortality post-heart transplantation. Despite improvements in mechanical circulatory support and critical care measures, the rate of PGD remains significant. A recent consensus statement by the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) has formulated a definition for PGD. Five years on, we look at current concepts and future directions of PGD in the current era of transplantation.

Assessment of Heart Transplant Waitlist Time and Pre- and Post-transplant Failure: A Mixed Methods Approach

BACKGROUND

Over the past two decades, there have been increasingly long waiting times for heart transplantation. We studied the relationship between heart transplant waiting time and transplant failure (removal from the waitlist, pretransplant death, or death or graft failure within 1 year) to determine the risk that conservative donor heart acceptance practices confer in terms of increasing the risk of failure among patients awaiting transplantation.

METHODS

We studied a cohort of 28,283 adults registered on the United Network for Organ Sharing heart transplant waiting list between 2000 and 2010. We used Kaplan-Meier methods with inverse probability censoring weights to examine the risk of transplant failure accumulated over time spent on the waiting list (pretransplant). In addition, we used transplant candidate blood type as an instrumental variable to assess the risk of transplant failure associated with increased wait time.

RESULTS

Our results show that those who wait longer for a transplant have greater odds of transplant failure. While on the waitlist, the greatest risk of failure is during the first 60 days. Doubling the amount of time on the waiting list was associated with a 10% (1.01, 1.20) increase in the odds of failure within 1 year after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest a relationship between time spent on the waiting list and transplant failure, thereby supporting research aimed at defining adequate donor heart quality and acceptance standards for heart transplantation.

Donor selection in the modern era

The growing disparity between the supply of donor hearts for transplantation and the demand for such organs has led to liberalization of the criteria for donor heart acceptance over the past few decades. The upper age limit and size restrictions for donor heart acceptance continue to be revised and hearts are being routinely used from donors with left ventricular dysfunction, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), cocaine use, multiple medical co-morbidities and after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This article reviews recent data for use of such "expanded criteria" donor hearts and suggests ways to further increase the donor pool, including use of hearts from donors with hepatitis C and after circulatory determination of death. Donor biomarkers and risk scores may eventually aid in heart acceptance decisions, while ethical issues surrounding information sharing with transplant recipients remain a topic of great debate.

Report From the American Society of Transplantation Conference on Donor Heart Selection in Adult Cardiac Transplantation in the United States

Cardiac transplantation remains the only definitive treatment for end-stage heart failure. Transplantation rates are limited by a shortage of donor hearts. This shortage is magnified because many hearts are discarded because of strict selection criteria and concern for regulatory reprimand for less-than-optimal posttransplant outcomes. There is no standardized approach to donor selection despite proposals to liberalize acceptance criteria. A donor heart selection conference was organized to facilitate discussion and generate ideas for future research. The event was attended by 66 participants from 41 centers with considerable experience in cardiac donor selection. There were state-of-the-art presentations on donor selection, with subsequent breakout sessions on standardizing the process and increasing utilization of donor hearts. Participants debated misconceptions and established agreement on donor and recipient risk factors for donor selection and identified the components necessary for a future donor risk score. Ideas for future initiatives include modification of regulatory practices to consider extended criteria donors when evaluating outcomes and prospective studies aimed at identifying the factors leading to nonacceptance of available donor hearts. With agreement on the most important donor and recipient risk factors, it is anticipated that a consistent approach to donor selection will improve rates of heart transplantation.

Guidelines for the assessment and acceptance of potential brain-dead organ donors

Organ transplantation is the only alternative for many patients with terminal diseases. The increasing disproportion between the high demand for organ transplants and the low rate of transplants actually performed is worrisome. Some of the causes of this disproportion are errors in the identification of potential organ donors and in the determination of contraindications by the attending staff. Therefore, the aim of the present document is to provide guidelines for intensive care multi-professional staffs for the recognition, assessment and acceptance of potential organ donors.

Matching the Market for Heart Transplantation

Heart transplantation is the most effective therapy for patients with Stage D heart failure with a median life expectancy of ≈10 to 15 years. Unfortunately, many patients die on the waiting list hoping for a chance of survival. The life boat cannot rescue everyone. Over a decade, the donor pool has remained relatively stable, whereas the number of heart transplant candidates has risen. Potential recipients often have many comorbidities and are older because the criteria for heart transplantation has few absolute contraindications. Women, Hispanics, and patients with restrictive heart disease and congenital heart disease are more likely to die while awaiting heart transplantation than men, white patients, and those with either ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy. To better match the market, we need to (1) increase the donor pool, (2) reduce the waitlist, and (3) improve the allocation system. This review article addresses all 3 options and compares strategies in the United States to those in other countries.

Perioperative myocardial injury after adult heart transplant: determinants and prognostic value

Background and Aim of the Study

Implications of Cardiac troponin (cTnI) release after cardiac transplantation are still unclear. This study disclosed risk factors and prognostic implication of cTnI early levels in a single centre cohort operated on between January 1999 and December 2010.

Methods

Data on 362 consecutive recipients (mean age: 47.8±13.7, 20.2% female, 18.2% diabetics, 22.1% with previous cardiac operations, 27.6% hospitalized, 84.9±29.4 ml/min preoperative glomerular filtration rate) were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression modeling. Target outcomes were determinants of troponin release, early graft failure (EGF), acute kidney injury (AKI) and operative death.

Results

Mean cTnI release measured 24 hours after transplant was 10.9±11.6 μg/L. Overall hospital mortality was 10.8%, EGF 10.5%, and AKI was 12.2%. cTnI release>10 μg/L proved an independent predictor of EGF (OR 2.2; 95% CI, 1.06–4.6) and AKI (OR 1.031; 95% CI, 1.001-1.064). EGF, in turn, proved a determinant of hospital mortality. Risk factors for cTnI>10 μg/L release were: status 2B (OR 0.35; 95% CI, 0.18-0.69, protective), duration of the ischemic period (OR 1.006; 95% CI, 1.001-1.011), previous cardiac operation (OR 2.9; 95% CI, 1.67-5.0), and left ventricular hypertrophy (OR 3.3; 95% CI, 1.9-5.6).

Conclusions

Myocardial enzyme leakage clearly emerged as an epiphenomenon of more complicated clinical course. The complex interplay between surgical procedure features, graft characteristics and recipient end-organ function highlights cTnI release as a risk marker of graft failure and acute kidney injury. The search for optimal myocardial preservation is still an issue.