Differential regulation of simultaneous antitumor and alloreactive CD8(+) T-cell responses in the same host by rapamycin

Discordant rearrangement of primary and anamnestic CD8+ T cell responses to influenza A viral epitopes upon exposure to bacterial superantigens: Implications for prophylactic vaccination, heterosubtypic immunity and superinfections

Infection with (SAg)-producing bacteria may precede or follow infection with or vaccination against influenza A viruses (IAVs). However, how SAgs alter the breadth of IAV-specific CD8⁺ T cell (T_CD8) responses is unknown. Moreover, whether recall responses mediating heterosubtypic immunity to IAVs are manipulated by SAgs remains unexplored. We employed wild-type (WT) and mutant bacterial SAgs, SAg-sufficient/deficient Staphylococcus aureus strains, and WT, mouse-adapted and reassortant IAV strains in multiple in vivo settings to address the above questions. Contrary to the popular view that SAgs delete or anergize T cells, systemic administration of staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) or Mycoplasma arthritidis mitogen before intraperitoneal IAV immunization enlarged the clonal size of ‘select’ IAV-specific T_CD8 and reshuffled the hierarchical pattern of primary T_CD8 responses. This was mechanistically linked to the TCR Vβ makeup of the impacted clones rather than their immunodominance status. Importantly, SAg-expanded T_CD8 retained their IFN-γ production and cognate cytolytic capacities. The enhancing effect of SEB on immunodominant T_CD8 was also evident in primary responses to vaccination with heat-inactivated and live attenuated IAV strains administered intramuscularly and intranasally, respectively. Interestingly, in prime-boost immunization settings, the outcome of SEB administration depended strictly upon the time point at which this SAg was introduced. Accordingly, SEB injection before priming raised CD127^highKLRG1^low memory precursor frequencies and augmented the anamnestic responses of SEB-binding T_CD8. By comparison, introducing SEB before boosting diminished recall responses to IAV-derived epitopes drastically and indiscriminately. This was accompanied by lower Ki67 and higher Fas, LAG-3 and PD-1 levels consistent with a pro-apoptotic and/or exhausted phenotype. Therefore, SAgs can have contrasting impacts on anti-IAV immunity depending on the naïve/memory status and the TCR composition of exposed T_CD8. Finally, local administration of SEB or infection with SEB-producing S. aureus enhanced pulmonary T_CD8 responses to IAV. Our findings have clear implications for superinfections and prophylactic vaccination.

Exposure to bacterial superantigens (SAgs) is often a consequence of infection with common Gram-positive bacteria causing septic and toxic shock or food poisoning. How SAgs affect the magnitude, breadth and quality of infection/vaccine-elicited CD8⁺ T cell (T_CD8) responses to respiratory viral pathogens, including influenza A viruses (IAVs), is far from clear. Also importantly, superinfections with IAVs and SAg-producing bacteria are serious clinical occurrences during seasonal and pandemic flu and require urgent attention. We demonstrate that two structurally distinct SAgs, including staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB), unexpectedly enhance primary T_CD8 responses to ‘select’ IAV-derived epitopes depending on the TCR makeup of the responding clones. Intriguingly, the timing of exposure to SEB dictates the outcome of prime-boost immunization. Seeing a SAg before priming raises memory precursor frequencies and augments anamnestic T_CD8 responses. Conversely, a SAg encounter before boosting renders T_CD8 prone to death or exhaustion and impedes recall responses, thus likely compromising heterosubtypic immunity to IAVs. Finally, local exposure to SEB increases the pulmonary response of immunodominant IAV-specific T_CD8. These findings shed new light on how bacterial infections and SAgs influence the effectiveness of anti-IAV T_CD8 responses, and have, as such, wide-ranging implications for preventative vaccination and infection control.

Therapeutic control of leishmaniasis by inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin

Leishmaniasis is a serious global health problem affecting many people worldwide. While patients with leishmaniasis can be treated with several agents, drug toxicicty and the emergence of resistant strains render available treatments ineffective in the long run. Inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) have been demonstrated to exert anti-pathogen properties. In this study, we tested the therapeutic efficacy of several mTOR inhibitors in controlling infection with Leishmania major. Rapamycin, GSK-2126458 and KU-0063794 were administered to BALB/c mice, which had received an intrafootpad injection of the parasite. Footpad swelling and parasite burden were assessed, and cytokine production by mouse splenocytes and phenotypic changes in draining lymph node cells were evaluated. Treatment with a clinically relevant dose of rapamycin or with GSK-2126458, but not with KU-0063794, dramatically lowered both the footpad swelling and the parasite load in the draining lymph node. Importantly, the employed dose of rapamycin did not kill the promastigotes in vitro as judged by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assays and electron microscopy. Moreover, the IL-4 production capacity of splenocytes harvested from infected mice that were treated with rapamycin was significantly reduced. Consequently, the IFN-γ:IL-4 production ratio was elevated, suggesting a T helper-type 1 (Th1)-skewed cytokine profile. Finally, the expression level of CD69, an early activation marker, on splenic and lymph node CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was enhanced in rapamycin-treated mice. Taken together, our findings suggest that select mTOR inhibitors may be used in therapeutic settings for the management of leishmaniasis. We propose that the beneficial effects of such inhibitors stem from their immunomodulatory properties. Therefore, the adjuvanticity of mTOR inhibitors may also be considered in vaccination strategies against Leishmania species.

PD-1 Blockade Promotes Epitope Spreading in Anticancer CD8+ T Cell Responses by Preventing Fratricidal Death of Subdominant Clones To Relieve Immunodomination

The interactions between programmed death-1 (PD-1) and its ligands hamper tumor-specific CD8⁺ T cell (T_CD8) responses, and PD-1-based "checkpoint inhibitors" have shown promise in certain cancers, thus revitalizing interest in immunotherapy. PD-1-targeted therapies reverse T_CD8 exhaustion/anergy. However, whether they alter the epitope breadth of T_CD8 responses remains unclear. This is an important question because subdominant T_CD8 are more likely than immunodominant clones to escape tolerance mechanisms and may contribute to protective anticancer immunity. We have addressed this question in an in vivo model of T_CD8 responses to well-defined epitopes of a clinically relevant oncoprotein, large T Ag. We found that unlike other coinhibitory molecules (CTLA-4, LAG-3, TIM-3), PD-1 was highly expressed by subdominant T_CD8, which correlated with their propensity to favorably respond to PD-1/PD-1 ligand-1 (PD-L1)-blocking Abs. PD-1 blockade increased the size of subdominant T_CD8 clones at the peak of their primary response, and it also sustained their presence, thus giving rise to an enlarged memory pool. The expanded population was fully functional as judged by IFN-γ production and MHC class I-restricted cytotoxicity. The selective increase in subdominant T_CD8 clonal size was due to their enhanced survival, not proliferation. Further mechanistic studies utilizing peptide-pulsed dendritic cells, recombinant vaccinia viruses encoding full-length T Ag or epitope mingenes, and tumor cells expressing T Ag variants revealed that anti-PD-1 invigorates subdominant T_CD8 responses by relieving their lysis-dependent suppression by immunodominant T_CD8 To our knowledge, our work constitutes the first report that interfering with PD-1 signaling potentiates epitope spreading in tumor-specific responses, a finding with clear implications for cancer immunotherapy and vaccination.

Quantification of Alloantibody-Mediated Cytotoxicity In Vivo

BACKGROUND

Preexisting, donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are culprits of hyperacute rejection. Donor-specific antibodies are also formed de novo, and their role in acute and chronic rejection is increasingly appreciated. However, it is difficult to assess damage inflicted exclusively by DSAs when alloreactive T cell and B cell responses coincide. We reasoned that allosensitization with "costimulation-deficient" cells should induce DSA synthesis but not naive cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) precursors' priming via direct allorecognition. Accordingly, we have developed a novel model to quantify DSA-mediated cytotoxicity in vivo.

METHODS

C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice were sensitized with H-2 kidney epithelial cells, and a cytofluorimetric killing assay was tailored to the measurement of allocytotoxicity. We took cell/complement depletion, costimulation blockade, and serum transfer approaches to reveal the mediators of cytotoxicity. "Third-party" controls and a skin allotransplantation model were used to confirm DSAs' specificity for allo-major histocompatibility complex. We validated our experimental approach in other mouse strains primed with different allogeneic cell types, including endothelial cells. To demonstrate the usefulness of our model/method for drug efficacy testing, we examined the effect of CTLA4-Ig and rapamycin on DSA-mediated cytolysis.

RESULTS

Allosensitization of MHC-disparate mouse strains with costimulation-deficient cells led to robust cytotoxicity mediated by complement-fixing DSAs and phagocytic cells. This response was independent of CTLs, natural killer or natural killer T cells. It required CD4 T cell help, CD40 signaling and CD28-based costimulation during allosensitization and could be reversed by sustained rapamycin treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The unique model described herein should enable mechanistic studies on sensitization and effector phases of humoral alloreactivity as well as efficacy testing of future immunotherapies to prevent DSA-induced pathology.

Suppression of immunodominant antitumor and antiviral CD8+ T cell responses by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is a tryptophan-degrading enzyme known to suppress antitumor CD8⁺ T cells (T_CD8). The role of IDO in regulation of antiviral T_CD8 responses is far less clear. In addition, whether IDO controls both immunodominant and subdominant T_CD8 is not fully understood. This is an important question because the dominance status of tumor- and virus-specific T_CD8 may determine their significance in protective immunity and in vaccine design. We evaluated the magnitude and breadth of cross-primed T_CD8 responses to simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen as well as primary and recall T_CD8 responses to influenza A virus (IAV) in the absence or presence of IDO. IDO^−/− mice and wild-type mice treated with 1-methyl-D-tryptophan, a pharmacological inhibitor of IDO, exhibited augmented responses to immunodominant epitopes encoded by T antigen and IAV. IDO-mediated suppression of these responses was independent of CD4⁺CD25⁺FoxP3⁺ regulatory T cells, which remained numerically and functionally intact in IDO^−/− mice. Treatment with L-kynurenine failed to inhibit T_CD8 responses, indicating that tryptophan metabolites are not responsible for the suppressive effect of IDO in our models. Immunodominant T antigen-specific T_CD8 from IDO^−/− mice showed increased Ki-67 expression, suggesting that they may have acquired a more vigorous proliferative capacity in vivo. In conclusion, IDO suppresses immunodominant T_CD8 responses to tumor and viral antigens. Our work also demonstrates that systemic primary and recall T_CD8 responses to IAV are controlled by IDO. Inhibition of IDO thus represents an attractive adjuvant strategy in boosting anticancer and antiviral T_CD8 targeting highly immunogenic antigens.