Thrombotic microangiopathy after living-donor liver transplantation

Thrombotic Microangiopathy After Hematopoietic Stem Cell and Solid Organ Transplantation: A Review for Intensive Care Physicians

Intensive care physicians may assume the primary care of patients with transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA), an uncommon but potentially critical complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) and solid organ transplants. TA-TMA can have a dramatic presentation with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) associated with high morbidity and mortality. The typical presenting clinical features are hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, refractory hypertension, proteinuria and worsening renal failure. Intestinal involvement, with abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, gastrointestinal bleeding, and ascites are also common. Cardiopulmonary involvement may develop from various causes including pulmonary arteriolar hypertension, pleural and pericardial effusions, and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage. Due to other often concurrent complications after HSCT, early diagnosis and effective management of TA-TMA may be challenging. Close collaboration between ICU and transplant physicians, along with other relevant specialists, is needed to best manage these patients. There are currently no approved therapies for the treatment of TA-TMA. Plasma exchange and rituximab are not recommended unless circulating factor H (CFH) antibodies or thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP; ADAMTS activity < 10%) are diagnosed or highly suspected. The role of the complement pathway activation in the pathophysiology of TA-TMA has led to the successful use of targeted complement inhibitors, such as eculizumab. However, the relatively larger studies using eculizumab have been mostly conducted in the pediatric population with limited data on the adult population. This review is focused on the role of intensive care physicians to emphasize the clinical approach to patients with suspected TA-TMA and to discuss diagnosis and treatment strategies.

The outcomes of thrombotic microangiopathy after liver transplantation: A nationwide survey in Japan

BACKGROUND

Although thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is recognized as one of the poor-prognosis factors after liver transplantation, the precise outcome of TMA is unclear. We sought to elucidate the factors affecting the outcome of TMA after liver transplantation in Japan, based on the data from a nationwide survey.

METHODS

One hundred cases of post-transplant TMA were accumulated from 17 Japanese centers of which two cases were excluded because the cause of death was obviously not related to TMA (recurrence of original diseases as primary sclerosing cholangitis and hepatocellular carcinoma), and the remaining 98 cases were enrolled in this study. The patient survival after the development of TMA and the factors that affected the patients' outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

All cases were living-donor liver transplant cases, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rates after transplantation were 66.9%, 64.6%, and 62.2%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, the requirement of renal replacement therapy during TMA treatment was the only factor that was significantly related to poor outcome after the development of TMA.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of TMA were generally poor. The progression of renal dysfunction despite intensive treatment might be the only factor related to the poor prognosis after the development of TMA.

Thrombotic Microangiopathy, Antibody-Mediated Rejection, and Posterior Reversible Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome in a Liver Transplant Recipient: Interplay Between COVID-19 and Its Treatment Modalities

The present COVID-19 pandemic is a cause for concern among solid-organ transplant recipients, who are generally at high risk for infection and for whom infection with COVID-19 carries additional risks for complications and mortality that are higher than the COVID-19-associated risks for the general population. We report the case of a liver transplant recipient who presented with COVID-19 and multiple complications. A 39-year-old woman with a liver transplant was diagnosed with COVID-19 within the first week after transplant surgery. Mycophenolate was withheld, and interferon β was administered for management of COVID-19. She developed thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, acute antibody-mediated rejection, and posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy syndrome during hospitalization. All of these complications may be related to COVID-19 or its management modalities. We considered 3 possible causes for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in this patient: the COVID-19 infection itself, immunosuppression treatment with cyclosporine, and treatment with interferon β. Immunosuppression reduction and interferon treatment may result in antibody-mediated rejection. COVID-19, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, and cyclosporine may play a combined role in the development of posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy syndrome. In conclusion, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, antibody-mediated rejection, and posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy syndrome may represent a continuum of 3 thrombotic microangiopathy conditions fostered by interplay between the COVID-19 infection and the treatment modalities for COVID-19 management in this patient.

von Willebrand factor to protein C ratio-related thrombogenicity with systemic inflammation is predictive of graft dysfunction after liver transplantation: Retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) is known to be a prototype of graft failure and ultimately influences long-term graft failure or death. We hypothesized that pretransplant thrombogenicity evaluated by procoagulant and anticoagulant, von Willebrand factor (vWF), factor Ⅷ (FⅧ), protein C (PC) and their imbalance ratio of vWF-to-PC (vWFPCR) and FVIII-to-PC (FⅧPCR), is associated with EAD and 90-day graft failure after living-related liver transplantation (LDLT) and contributes to further exacerbation of graft dysfunction when coexists with systemic inflammation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Of 1199 prospectively registered LDLT patients, 698 with measurements of each thrombogenicity parameters were analyzed. Risk factors for EAD development were searched and subsequent best cut-offs was calculated according to the receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. When comparing the outcome, multivariable regression analysis and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) of the propensity score were performed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of EAD was 10.7% (n = 75/698) after LDLT. Of parameters, vWFPCR had highest predictivity potential of EAD with the best cut-off of 8.06. The relationship between vWFPCR≥8.06 showed significant association with EAD development (OR [95%CI], 2.55[1.28-5.09], P = 0.008) and 90-day graft failure (HR [95%CI], 2.24 [1-4.98], P = 0.043) after IPTW-adjustment. Furthermore, risk of EAD increased proportionally with increasing C-reactive protein as a continuous metric of systemic inflammation, and more steeply in those with higher thrombogenicity (i.e., higher vWFPCR). Adding vWFPCR to MELD score improved EAD risk prediction by 21.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant thrombogenicity assessed by imbalance of pro- and anticoagulant, was significantly associated with EAD and 90-day graft failure after LDLT and this association was worsened by systemic inflammation.

vWFpp/ADAMTS13 ratio is a useful marker of postliver transplantation thrombotic microangiopathy: A pediatric case report

vWFpp/ADAMTS13 ratio should be further studied as a useful marker for diagnosis of thrombotic microangiopathy postliver transplantation. Immunosuppressive regimen modification and plasma supplementation can lead to recovery.

A Heterozygous CFHR3-CFHR1 Gene Deletion in a Pediatric Patient With Transplant-associated Thrombotic Microangiopathy Who was Treated With Eculizumab

Complement system dysregulation, such as complement Factor H (CFH) autoantibodies and deletions in CFH-related (CFHR) genes 3 and 1, might cause transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA). The use of eculizumab, a terminal complement inhibitor, could be a targeted therapy for TA-TMA. We report a 1-year-old girl who developed TA-TMA, just after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in neuroblastoma therapy. Eculizumab improved TA-TMA. Investigation for the complement alternative pathway showed a heterozygous CFHR3-CFHR1 gene deletion, which is involved in complement activation. The patient might develop TA-TMA as a result of complement regulatory gene mutation.

Feasibility of Monotherapy by Rituximab Without Additional Desensitization in ABO-incompatible Living-Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is a cornerstone in the regimens of desensitization for ABO-incompatible living-donor liver transplantation (ABO-i LDLT) that makes this modality an acceptable option for liver transplantation. Plasmapheresis (PP) to reduce anti-ABO antibody titer and local infusion (LI) therapy were practiced as the strategies for desensitization before the application of rituximab and were reported as additional treatments. The aim of this study was to clarify the feasibility of monotherapy by rituximab without any additional desensitization treatments in ABO-i LT.

METHODS

Forty patients receiving ABO-i LDLT with rituximab were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the rituximab with pretransplant PP and posttransplant LI (RPL) group (n = 20) and the rituximab monotherapy (RM) without any additional treatment group (n = 20). The groups were then compared in terms of the rates of patient survival, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and infection.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rates were 85%, 85%, and 85% in the RPL group and 89%, 80%, and 80% in the RM group, respectively. There was no significant difference in patient survival between the 2 groups. There were no episodes of AMR in either group. The RM group had a lower rate of fungal and viral infections than the RPL group.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant rituximab without additional treatments yielded satisfactory outcomes comparable to that with additional treatments, such as PP and LI.

Von Willebrand Factor Deposition and ADAMTS-13 Consumption in Allograft Tissue of Thrombotic Microangiopathy-like Disorder After Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) pathogenesis after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is thought to be caused by release of unusually large von Willebrand factor multimers (UL-vWFMs) resulting from sinusoidal endothelial cell damage and induction of platelet adhesion and aggregation. A decrease in a disintegrin-like and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin type 1 motifs-13 (ADAMTS-13) that cleave UL-vWFMs might cause excessive UL-vWFMs activity and result in platelet thrombus formation. However, this phenomenon has not undergone a full pathologic assessment.

PROCEDURES

A 60-year-old man was diagnosed with hepatitis C-related end-stage cirrhosis. His son was the donor, and he underwent LDLT. On postoperative day 44, his laboratory findings met most TMA diagnostic criteria, and he was diagnosed with TMA-like disorder (TMALD). Localization of CD42b as a platelet marker, vWF, and ADAMTS-13 in allograft tissue of this patient were evaluated using immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

CD42b expression was observed as platelet aggregates attached to hepatocytes or within the hepatocyte cytoplasm, a morphology called extravasated platelet aggregation (EPA). vWF expression was observed mainly as deposited compact clusters, and ADAMTS-13 expression resembled distinct dots throughout the liver tissue.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that EPA indicated sinusoidal endothelial cell damage followed by detachment, and vWF deposition resulted from UL-vWFM oversynthesis. ADAMTS-13 might be consumed in the allograft tissue to cleave UL-vWFMs, but ADAMTS-13 levels might be insufficient to cleave all the deposited UL-vWFMs. We present the case of an LDLT recipient diagnosed with TMALD using blood tests, which showed the presence of TMA pathogenesis in the allograft.

Protecting the Kidney in Liver Transplant Recipients: Practice-Based Recommendations From the American Society of Transplantation Liver and Intestine Community of Practice

Both acute and chronic kidney disease are common after liver transplantation and result in significant morbidity and mortality. The introduction of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease score has directly correlated with an increased prevalence of perioperative renal dysfunction and the number of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantations performed. Kidney dysfunction in this population is typically multifactorial and related to preexisting conditions, pretransplantation renal injury, perioperative events, and posttransplantation nephrotoxic immunosuppressive therapies. The management of kidney disease after liver transplantation is challenging, as by the time the serum creatinine level is significantly elevated, few interventions affect the course of progression. Also, immunological factors such as antibody-mediated kidney rejection have become of greater interest given the rising liver-kidney transplant population. Therefore, this review, assembled by experts in the field and endorsed by the American Society of Transplantation Liver and Intestine Community of Practice, provides a critical assessment of measures of renal function and interventions aimed at preserving renal function early and late after liver and simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation. Key points and practice-based recommendations for the prevention and management of kidney injury in this population are provided to offer guidance for clinicians and identify gaps in knowledge for future investigations.

Elevated Soluble Platelet Glycoprotein VI Levels in Patients After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Plasma-soluble platelet glycoprotein VI (sGPVI) levels were examined in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), and the relationship between platelet activation and thrombocytopenia was evaluated to understand the mechanism of thrombocytopenia in LDLT. Platelet counts were significantly higher in the donors compared to the recipient, and the plasma sGPVI levels increased in both groups after the operation. Regarding the relationship between the platelet counts and the sGPVI levels, the slope varied on different days, and it became negative on day 3, suggesting that the plasma sGPVI levels are related to platelet activation in LDLT. The frequency of complications was high in the nonsurvivors. The platelet counts were higher in the survivors than in the nonsurvivors on days 14 and 28. Although the plasma levels of sGPVI in the survivors increased after the operation, those in the nonsurvivors were high only on day 3. Although the ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 domain, member 13) levels were markedly reduced, von Willebrand factor (VWF) and VWF propeptide (VWFpp) were markedly elevated during LDLT. The antithrombin activity was significantly lower (day 14) and VWFpp (day 28) was significantly higher in the nonsurvivors than in the survivors. These findings suggest that platelet activation first occurs after LDLT, and it is high in the nonsurvivors on day 3. Thereafter, the hemostatic abnormality and vascular endothelial cell injuries may appear on days 14 and 28.

Acute Kidney Disease After Liver and Heart Transplantation

After transplantation of nonrenal solid organs, an acute decline in kidney function develops in the majority of patients. In addition, a significant number of nonrenal solid organ transplant recipients develop chronic kidney disease, and some develop end-stage renal disease, requiring renal replacement therapy. The incidence varies depending on the transplanted organ. Acute kidney injury after nonrenal solid organ transplantation is associated with prolonged length of stay, cost, increased risk of death, de novo chronic kidney disease, and end-stage renal disease. This overview focuses on the risk factors for posttransplant acute kidney injury after liver and heart transplantation, integrating discussion of proteinuria and chronic kidney disease with emphasis on pathogenesis, histopathology, and management including the use of mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibition and costimulatory blockade.

Evaluation methods for pretransplant oncologic markers and their prognostic impacts in patient undergoing living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Tumor markers [alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) or des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin (DCP)] and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) reportedly correlate with long-term outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, no standardized method has been established for evaluating the pretransplant data. One hundred and twenty-four patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) were retrospectively reviewed. The best predictive parameters for tumor recurrence were maximum values for AFP or DCP and 90-day mean values for NLR, respectively, and multivariate analysis confirmed these values were correlated with tumor recurrence. However, receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that discriminative powers were sufficient only in maximum AFP [area under the curve (AUC) 0.88, P < 0.001] and maximum DCP (AUC 0.76, P < 0.001), while mean NLR was less predictive (AUC 0.62, P = 0.20). When incorporating AFP and DCP to the Tokyo criteria (≤5 tumors with each tumor ≤ 5 cm), the presence of at least two of the following factors: (i) beyond the Tokyo criteria, (ii) AFP>250 ng/ml, and (iii) DCP > 450 mAu/ml (>450 ng/ml), was correlated with a worse 5-year disease-free survival rate (20.0% vs. 96.8%, P < 0.001) and 5-year overall survival rate (20.0% vs. 84.0%, P < 0.001). The prognosis of patients undergoing LDLT for HCC strongly relies on maximum AFP or DCP values before transplantation, while the prognostic impact of NLR is limited.

Living donor liver transplantation for patients immunized against human leukocyte antigen

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The clinical features and perioperative management of liver transplant recipients who are already sensitized against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) prior to transplantation are not yet clear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of living donor liver transplant recipients were reviewed and clinical features of the patients possessing anti-HLA antibodies were studied.

RESULTS

Among the 470 consecutive living donor liver transplant recipients, 6 patients (1.3%) had preformed anti-HLA antibodies. A review of the postoperative courses of these patients revealed that the problems included platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR) due to immune-mediated destruction of platelet and thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). PTR was observed in patients with anti-HLA class I antibodies and only HLA-matched platelet concentrate (HLA-matched PC) relieved thrombocytopenia. Intravenous gammaglobulin had an additive effect to HLA-matched PC in some cases, and platelet transfusion from close relatives might be a substitute for HLA-matched PC in life-threatening situations. Although the etiology of TMA is unremarkable, the incidence was high (67%, 4/6) compared with that in patients who were not sensitized against HLA (5.6%, 26/464; p < 0.01). Of the four patients, three were complicated with late-onset TMA.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering these clinical features, careful preparation and postoperative management are needed for liver transplant candidates with anti-HLA antibodies.