Functional status after lung transplantation in older adults in the post-allocation score era

Impact of lung transplantation on diastolic dysfunction in recipients with pretransplant pulmonary hypertension

OBJECTIVE

Pulmonary hypertension can cause left ventricular diastolic dysfunction through ventricular interdependence. Moreover, diastolic dysfunction has been linked to adverse outcomes after lung transplant. The impact of lung transplant on diastolic dysfunction in recipients with pretransplant pulmonary hypertension is not defined. In this cohort, we aimed to assess the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction, the change in diastolic dysfunction after lung transplant, and the impact of diastolic dysfunction on lung transplant outcomes.

METHODS

In a large, single-center database from January 2011 to September 2021, single or bilateral lung transplant recipients with pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure > 20 mm Hg) were retrospectively identified. Those without a pre- or post-transplant echocardiogram within 1 year were excluded. Diastolic dysfunction was diagnosed and graded according to the American Society of Echocardiography 2016 guideline on assessment of diastolic dysfunction (present, absent, indeterminate). McNemar's test was used to examine association between diastolic dysfunction pre- and post-transplant. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were used to assess associations between pre-lung transplant diastolic dysfunction and post-lung transplant 1-year outcomes, including mortality, major adverse cardiac events, and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome grade 1 or higher-free survival.

RESULTS

Of 476 primary lung transplant recipients, 205 with pulmonary hypertension formed the study cohort (mean age, 56.6 ± 11.9 years, men 61.5%, mean pulmonary artery pressure 30.5 ± 9.8 mm Hg, left ventricular ejection fraction < 55% 9 [4.3%]). Pretransplant, diastolic dysfunction was present in 93 patients (45.4%) (grade I = 8, II = 84, III = 1), absent in 16 patients (7.8%), and indeterminate in 89 patients (43.4%), and 7 patients (3.4%) had missing data. Post-transplant, diastolic dysfunction was present in 7 patients (3.4%) (grade I = 2, II = 5, III = 0), absent in 164 patients (80.0%), and indeterminate in 15 patients (7.3%), and 19 patients (9.3%) had missing data. For those with diastolic dysfunction grades in both time periods (n = 180), there was a significant decrease in diastolic dysfunction post-transplant (148/169 patients with resolved diastolic dysfunction; McNemar's test P < .001). Pretransplant diastolic dysfunction was not associated with major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08, 95% CI, 0.72-1.62; P = .71), bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome-free survival (HR, 0.67, 95% CI, 0.39-1.56; P = .15), or mortality (HR, 0.70, 95% CI, 0.33-1.46; P = .34) at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Diastolic dysfunction is highly prevalent in lung transplant candidates with normal left ventricular systolic function and pulmonary hypertension, and resolves in most patients after lung transplant regardless of patient characteristics. Pre-lung transplant diastolic dysfunction was not associated with adverse lung or cardiac outcomes after lung transplant. Collectively, these findings suggest that the presence of diastolic dysfunction in lung transplant recipients with pulmonary hypertension has no prognostic significance, and as such diastolic dysfunction and the associated clinical syndrome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction should not be considered a relative contraindication to lung transplant in such patients.

Performance status at the time of lung retransplant predicts long-term function

BACKGROUND

Lung retransplantation is offered to select patients with chronic allograft dysfunction. Given the increased risk of morbidity and mortality conferred by retransplantation, post-transplant function should be considered in the decision of who and when to list. The aim of this study is to identify predictors of post-operative disability in patients undergoing lung retransplantation.

METHODS

Data were collected from the UNOS national dataset and included all patients who underwent lung retransplant from May 2005-March 2023. Pre- and post-operative function was reported by the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and patients were stratified based on their needs. Cumulative link mixed effects models identified associations between pre-transplant variables and post-transplant function.

RESULTS

A total of 1275 lung retransplant patients were included. After adjusting for between-group differences, pre-operative functional status was predictive of post-transplant function; patients requiring Total Assistance ( n = 740) were 74% more likely than No/Some Assistance patients (n = 535) to require more assistance in follow-up (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.13-2.68, p = .012). Estimated one year survival of Total Assistance patients is lower than No/Some Assistance Recipients (72% vs. 82%, CI 69%-75%; 79%-86%) but similar to overall re-transplant survival (76%, CI 74%-79%).

CONCLUSION

Both survival and regain of function in patients requiring Total Assistance prior to retransplant may be higher than previously reported. Pre-operative functional status is predictive of post-operative function and should weigh in the selection, timing and post-operative care of patients considered for lung retransplantation.

Disturbed sleep after lung transplantation is associated with worse patient-reported outcomes and chronic lung allograft dysfunction

Many lung transplant recipients fail to derive the expected improvements in functioning, HRQL, or long-term survival. Sleep may represent an important, albeit rarely examined, factor influencing lung transplant outcomes. Within a larger cohort study, 141 lung transplant recipients completed the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale along with a broader survey of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and frailty assessment. MOS Sleep yields the Sleep Problems Index (SPI); we also derived an insomnia-specific subscale. Potential perioperative predictors of disturbed sleep and time to chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) and death were derived from medical records. We investigated associations between perioperative predictors on SPI and Insomnia and associations between SPI and Insomnia on PROs and frailty by linear regressions, adjusting for age, sex, and lung function. We evaluated the associations between SPI and Insomnia on time to CLAD and death using Cox models, adjusting for age, sex, and transplant indication. Post-transplant hospital length of stay >30 days was associated with worse sleep by SPI and insomnia (SPI: p=0.01; Insomnia p=0.02). Worse sleep by SPI and insomnia was associated with worse depression, cognitive function, HRQL, physical disability, health utilities, and Fried Frailty Phenotype frailty (all p<0.01). Those in the worst quartile of SPI and insomnia exhibited increased risk of CLAD (HR 2.18; 95%CI: 1.22-3.89 ; p=0.01 for SPI and HR 1.96; 95%CI 1.09-3.53; p=0.03 for insomnia). Worsening in SPI but not insomnia was also associated with mortality (HR: 1.29; 95%CI: 1.05-1.58; p=0.01). Poor sleep after lung transplant may be a novel predictor of patient reported outcomes, frailty, CLAD, and death with potentially important screening and treatment implications.

Elderly lung transplant recipients show acceptable long-term outcomes for lung transplantation: A propensity score-matched analysis

PURPOSE

Although the performance lung transplantation (LTx) in the elderly (≥ 60 years) has increased globally, the situation in Japan remains quite different, because the age limit at registration for cadaveric transplantation is 60 years. We investigated the long-term outcomes of LTx in the elderly in Japan.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study. We divided the patients into two groups according to age: the younger group (< 60 years; Y group; n = 194) and the elderly group (≥ 60 years; E group; n = 10). We performed three-to-one propensity score matching to compare the long-term survival between the E and Y groups.

RESULTS

In the E group, the survival rate was significantly worse (p = 0.003), and single-LTx was more frequent (p = 0.036). There was a significant difference in the indications for LTx between the two groups (p < 0.001). The 5-year survival rate after single-LTx in the E group was significantly lower than that in the Y group (p = 0.006). After propensity score matching, the 5-year survival rates of the two groups were comparable (p = 0.55). However, the 5-year survival rate after single-LTx in the E group was significantly lower than that in the Y group (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients showed acceptable long-term survival after LTx.

Listing Dilemmas: Age, Frailty, Weight, Preexisting Cancers, and Systemic Diseases

Selection of lung transplant candidates is an evolving field that pushes the boundaries of what is considered the norm. Given the continually changing demographics of the typical lung transplant recipient as well as the growing list of risk factors that predispose patients to poor posttransplant outcomes, we explore the dilemmas in lung transplant candidate selections pertaining to older age, frailty, low and high body mass index, preexisting cancers, and systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Decline in Functional Status While on the Waiting List Predicts Worse Survival After Lung Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

To determine if decreases in the Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) while on the waitlist predict decreased survival after lung transplantation (LTx).

DESIGN

A retrospective evaluation of the United Network for Organ Sharing database. The KPS was evaluated at the time of listing for transplant and at the time of transplantation. Group I consisted of patients having a decrease in KPS during the time on the waiting list (from the time of listing to the time of transplant), and Group II consisted of patients whose KPS stayed the same or increased during the same period. The authors used propensity-score weighting for comparisons of these groups.

SETTING

Retrospective observational database review.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients undergoing lung transplantation.

INTERVENTIONS

None. Patients were stratified according to a change in their KPS.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patient and graft survival of patients with decreasing or not decreasing KPS were compared. Of the 27,558 subjects included in the analysis, 17,986 (65%) had worsening KPS, which was associated with worse graft (p = 0.0003) and patient (p = 0.0019) survival after LTx. Using multivariate regression, a decrease in KPS of ≥40 was associated with decreased survival, and an increase of ≥40 was associated with improved survival (HR = 1.245, 95% CI [1.181-1.312], p < 0.0001 and HR = 0.866, 95% CI [0.785, 0.955], respectively). Among patients with a KPS <40 at the time of transplant, those with a decrease in KPS of ≥40 had decreased graft and patient survival compared with those with a smaller decrease (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.0021, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Deterioration of KPS on the waiting list for LTx is associated with significantly greater postoperative mortality in patients after LTx. These results should be taken into consideration when allocating organs. Strategies to increase or to prevent a decrease in KPS before LTx should be evaluated.

Time since primary transplant and poor functional status predict survival after redo lung transplant

BACKGROUND

In previous studies, lower functional status measured by Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) correlated with worse survival after redo lung transplant. We hypothesize that combining reduced functional status and time from primary lung transplant will correlate with the etiology of lung allograft failure after primary lung transplant and more accurately predict survival after redo lung transplant.

METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board. From the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database, 739 patients underwent redo lung transplant (01/01/2005-8/30/2019). Pre-lung transplant characteristics, KPS, time between primary and redo lung transplant, outcomes, overall survival were evaluated. Paired comparisons were used to compare pre-transplant variables. A Cox regression model was fit to examine re-transplant survival. Due to non-proportional hazards, time between transplants was split into <1-year vs. 1+ years and analyzed with time-dependent coefficients, with follow-up time considered in three segments (0-6, 6-24, 24+ months).

RESULTS

After KPS grouping (10-40%, 50-70%, 80-100%), KPS 10-40% were less likely to be discharged after primary transplant and more likely required mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) bridging (P<0.001). Redo lung transplant survival was worse in the KPS 10-40% group who more likely underwent lung transplant <1 year after primary lung transplant. Mortality was significantly higher for patients who underwent redo lung transplant within one year of primary transplant when KPS was 10-40% (P<0.001). These patients were more likely to require redo lung transplant due to primary graft failure or acute cellular rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional status and time from primary lung transplant are strong predictors of outcome after redo lung transplant. We categorized redo lung transplant recipients in two distinct groups. One group has early allograft failure and poor functional status with a very poor prognosis after redo lung transplant. The other group has chronic allograft failure and overall better functional status with relatively better survival after redo lung transplant. Salvage redo lung transplant for primary allograft failure or acute rejection is associated with low one year survival.

Outcomes after lung transplantation in recipients aged 70 years or older

BACKGROUND

The proportion of lung transplant (LTx) recipients older than 70 years is increasing, thus we assessed long-term survival after LTx in this cohort relative to younger counterparts.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients who underwent LTx between 2012 and 2016 at our center and divided patients by age: group A (<65 years), B (65-69 years), and C (≥70 years). Survival statistics were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression.

RESULTS

The study included 375 LTx recipients: 221 (58.9%) in group A, 109 (29.1%) in group B, and 45 (12.0%) in group C. Group C was mostly men (37/45 [82.2%]; P = 0.003) and had the highest mean serum creatinine at listing (P = 0.02). Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years after transplant in group A (93.2%, 70.1%, 58.8%) was significantly higher than group B (83.5%, 59.6%, 44.0%; P = 0.005, 0.028, 0.006, log-rank test) and was similar to group C (86.7%, 64.4%, 57.8%), although trended higher at 1 year (P = 0.139, 0.274, 0.489, log-rank test). Groups B and C had comparable survival at all time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Although survival decreased after age 65, long-term survival was comparable between LTx recipients aged 65-69 years and recipients ≥70 years.

Construct and Predictive Validity of Sarcopenia in Lung Transplant Candidates

Rationale: Sarcopenia is associated with disability and death. The optimal definition and clinical relevance of sarcopenia in lung transplantation remain unknown. Objectives: To assess the construct and predictive validity of sarcopenia definitions in lung transplant candidates. Methods: In a multicenter prospective cohort of 424 lung transplant candidates, we evaluated limited (muscle mass only) and expanded (muscle mass and quality) sarcopenia definitions from the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH), and a cohort-specific distribution-based lowest quartile definition. We assessed construct validity using associations with conceptually related factors. We evaluated the relationship between sarcopenia and frailty using generalized additive models. We also evaluated associations between sarcopenia definitions and key pretransplant outcomes, including disability (quantified by the Lung Transplant Valued Life Activities scale [range, 0-3; higher scores = worse disability; minimally important difference, 0.3]) and waitlist delisting/death, by multivariate linear and Cox regression, respectively. Results: Sarcopenia prevalence ranged from 6% to13% by definition used. The limited EWGSOP2 definition demonstrated the highest construct validity, followed by the expanded EWGSOP2 definition and both limited and expanded FNIH and lowest quartile definitions. Sarcopenia exhibited a linear association with the risk of frailty. The EWGSOP2 and expanded lowest quartile definitions were associated with disability, ranging from 0.20 to 0.25 higher Lung Transplant Valued Life Activities scores. Sarcopenia was associated with increased risk of waitlist delisting or death by the limited and expanded lowest quartile definitions (hazard ratio [HR], 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-9.9 and HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.1-11.0, respectively) and the EWGSOP2 limited definition (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 0.9-8.6) but not with the three other candidate definitions. Conclusions: The prevalence and validity of sarcopenia vary by definition; the EWGSOP2 limited definition exhibited the broadest validity in lung transplant candidates. The linear relationship between low muscle mass and frailty highlights sarcopenia's contribution to frailty and also questions the clinical utility of a sarcopenia cut-point in advanced lung disease. The associations between sarcopenia and important pretransplant outcomes support further investigation into using body composition for candidate risk stratification.

Changes in Functional Status Among Kidney Transplant Recipients: Data From the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

With stressors of dialysis prekidney transplantation (KT) and restoration of kidney function post-KT, it is likely that KT recipients experience a decline in functional status while on the waitlist and improvements post-KT.

METHODS

We leveraged 224 832 KT recipients from the national registry (SRTR, February 1990-May 2019) with measured Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS, 0%-100%) at listing, KT admission, and post-KT. We quantified the change in KPS from listing to KT using generalized linear models. We described post-KT KPS trajectories using adjusted mixed-effects models and tested whether those trajectories differed by age, sex, race, and diabetes status using a Wald test among all KT recipients. We then quantified risk adverse post-KT outcomes (mortality and all-cause graft loss [ACGL]) by preoperative KPS and time-varying KPS.

RESULTS

Mean KPS declined from listing (83.7%) to admission (78.9%) (mean = 4.76%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -4.82, -4.70). After adjustment, mean KPS improved post-KT (slope = 0.89%/y, 95% CI: 0.87, 0.91); younger, female, non-Black, and diabetic recipients experienced greater post-KT improvements (Pinteractions < 0.001). Lower KPS (per 10% decrease) at admission was associated with greater mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.11) and ACGL (aHR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.09) risk. Lower post-KT KPS (per 10% decrease; time-varying) were more strongly associated with mortality (aHR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.92, 1.94) and ACGL (aHR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.83, 1.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Functional status declines pre-KT and improves post-KT in the national registry. Despite post-KT improvements, poorer functional status at KT and post-KT are associated with greater mortality and ACGL risk. Because of its dynamic nature, clinicians should repeatedly screen for lower functional status pre-KT to refer vulnerable patients to prehabilitation in hopes of reducing risk of adverse post-KT outcomes.

Karnofsky Performance Status Following Liver Transplantation in Patients With Multiple Organ Failures and Probable Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Little is known about outcomes of patients who underwent liver transplantation for acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) and multiple organ failures. We compared Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) before and after liver transplantation among patients with different numbers of organ failures and probable ACLF.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent liver transplantation within 30 days of listing with the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) network from January 1, 2006, through September 30, 2016. We determined the prevalence of organ failures using a modified version of the Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scale and collected KPS scores at the time of transplantation and at intervals of 3 to 12 months after liver transplantation. Multivariate analyses were performed to adjust for confounders including UNOS region.

RESULTS

At the time of liver transplantation, 2838 patients had no organ failure, 2944 had 1 to 2 organ failures, and 1342 patients had 3 or more organ failures. KPS scores following liver transplantation improved significantly in all groups; scores ranged from 81 in patients with no organ failure to 72 in patients with 5 to 6 organ failures. Excellent performance status (KPS score, ≥80) by 1 year after transplantation was achieved by 60% of patients with 5 to 6 organ failures, 64% to 66% of patients with 3 to 4 organ failures, and 70% to 71% of patients with 1 to 2 organ failures, compared with 72.5% of patients without organ failure. Patients with 1 to 4 organ failure were more likely to achieve KPS scores of 80 or more than patients without organ failure, after we adjusted for other covariates and UNOS region. In addition, black patients were less likely, and patients with alcoholic cirrhosis were more likely, to have KPS scores of 80 or more after liver transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

In a retrospective cohort study of patients with probable ACLF who underwent liver transplantation within 30 days of listing with the UNOS network, 60% to 66% of patients with 3 or more organ failures achieved excellent performance 3 to 12 months later.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and American Association for Thoracic Surgery Workshop Report: Identifying collaborative clinical research priorities in lung transplantation

This report summarizes the discussion and recommendations from the June 2017 NHLBI-AATS Workshop on Identifying Collaborative Clinical Research Priorities in Lung Transplantation.

Bilateral versus single lung transplantation: are two lungs better than one?

There is a long-standing debate over whether single or bilateral lung transplant provides better short and long-term clinical outcomes. We performed a detailed PubMed search on relevant clinical research publications on single (SLT) and bilateral lung transplantation (BLT). We included studies that were published before and after the implementation of the lung allocation score (LAS). We reviewed disease-specific short- and long-term outcomes associated with each transplantation technique. The majority of published studies are retrospective cohort studies that use institutional data or large patient registries. Outcomes associated with transplantation technique vary by disease specific indication, age, and patient severity. Over the past decade, the relative proportion of bilateral lung transplantation has increased. Increasing adoption of bilateral lung transplant likely reflects the general acceptance of several advantages associated with the technique. However, making a clear, evidence-based decision is difficult in light of the fact that there has never been and probably never will be a randomized trial. Our institutional preference is bilateral lung transplant. However, consideration for the technique should still be made on a case-by-case basis.

Functional status, healthcare utilization, and the costs of liver transplantation

The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score predicts higher transplant healthcare utilization and costs; however, the independent contribution of functional status towards costs is understudied. The study objective was to evaluate the association between functional status, as measured by Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and liver transplant (LT) costs in the first posttransplant year. In a cohort of 598 LT recipients from July 1, 2009 to November 30, 2014, multivariable models assessed associations between KPS and outcomes. LT recipients needing full assistance (KPS 10%-40%) vs being independent (KPS 80%-100%) were more likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation facility after LT (22% vs 3%) and be rehospitalized within the first posttransplant year (78% vs 57%), all P < .001. In adjusted generalized linear models, in addition to MELD (P < .001), factors independently associated with higher 1-year post-LT transplant costs were older age, poor functional status (KPS 10%-40%), living donor LT, pre-LT hemodialysis, and the donor risk index (all P < .001). One-year survival for patients in the top cost decile was 83% vs 93% for the rest of the cohort (log rank P < .001). Functional status is an important determinant of posttransplant resource utilization; therefore, standardized measurements of functional status should be considered to optimize candidate selection and outcomes.

Lung transplantation in elderly patients

Consensus statements on the selection of lung transplant candidates have consistently identified older age as a relative contraindication to transplantation. A combination of population-level demographic changes, revision of the lung allocation score (LAS), and clearer data on outcomes in elderly transplant recipients has, however, driven a steady increase in the threshold at which age is taken into consideration. This article reviews the current state of lung transplantation in elderly patients with an emphasis on the factors that have increased lung transplantation in older age groups, their expected outcomes including survival and health-related quality of life, and the factors that go in to appropriate candidate and procedure selection in this population.

Lung transplantation in the elderly: Influence of age, comorbidities, underlying disease, and extended criteria donor lungs

OBJECTIVE

As large registries show an increased risk for lung transplant recipients aged 60 years or more, few single centers report favorable outcomes for carefully selected older recipients without providing essential details. The purpose of our study was to determine variables that influence survival in the elderly.

METHODS

All adult bilateral first lung transplants between January 2000 and December 2014 were divided in 2 groups: those aged less than 60 years (N = 223) and those aged 60 years or more (N = 83). The Charlson-Deyo Index determined recipient comorbidities. The Oto Donor Score assessed donor lung quality.

RESULTS

Recipients aged 60 years or more had a significant lower median survival compared with their younger counterparts (48 vs 112 months, respectively, P < .001). Recipient age was as an exponentially increasing univariate risk factor for mortality. By adjusting for variables in multivariate analysis, this trend was nonsignificant. The displacing variables were idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-2.2), Charlson-Deyo Index 2 or greater (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.8), systemic hypertension (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.6), gastroesophageal reflux (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1), diverticulosis (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-2.7), and an Oto Donor Score 8 or greater (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.0). All of these risk factors were significantly more likely to occur in recipients aged 60 years or more, except for a tendency for high Charlson-Deyo Index.

CONCLUSIONS

The comorbidity profile, underlying disease, and donor lung quality appear to be more important than age in reducing long-term survival. Older age serves as a marker for a complex constellation of factors that might be considered the relative or absolute contraindication to lung transplantation rather than age, per se.

Effects of Recipient Age and Diagnosis on Health-related Quality-of-Life Benefit of Lung Transplantation

RATIONALE

The average age of lung transplant recipients is increasing, and the mix of recipient indications for transplantation is changing.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) benefit of lung transplantation differs by recipient age and diagnosis.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, we obtained serial HRQL measurements in adults with advanced lung disease who subsequently underwent lung transplantation (2004-2012). HRQL assessments included the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), EQ-5D, Standard Gamble, and Visual Analog Scale for current health. We used linear mixed effects models for associations between age or diagnosis and changes in HRQL with transplantation. To address potential survivorship bias, we fitted Markov models to the distribution of discrete post-transplant health states (HRQL better than pretransplant, not better, or dead) and estimated quality-adjusted life-years post-transplant.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 430 subjects were listed, 387 were transplanted, and 326 provided both pretransplant and post-transplant data. Transplantation conferred large improvements in all HRQL measures: St. George's change of -47 units (95% confidence interval, -48 to -44), 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey physical component summary score of 17.7 (16.5-18.9), EQ-5D of 0.27 (0.24-0.30), Standard Gamble of 0.48 (0.44-0.51), and Visual Analog of 44 (42-47). Age was not associated with meaningful differences in the HRQL benefits of transplantation. There was less HRQL benefit in interstitial lung disease than in cystic fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung transplantation confers large HRQL benefits, which vary by recipient diagnosis, but do not differ substantially in older recipients.

Preoperative performance status impacts perioperative morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine which factors predict poor postoperative performance and to evaluate the impact of these variables on 1-year mortality.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for adult patients undergoing lung transplantation (LTx) from 2007 to 2011. Patients were divided based on their preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status score (KPS) into 3 groups. Regression analysis was conducted to determine which factors predicted poor postoperative performance. Cox modeling was utilized to identify which of these factors was associated with an increased risk of mortality after LTx.

RESULTS

Of the 7,832 patients included in this study, 30.1% required complete assistance, 57.7% required partial assistance, and 12.3% needed no assistance preoperatively. Postoperative KPS was assessed at a mean of 2.6 ± 1.5 years after transplant. A number of factors, including primary graft failure, redo and single LTx, and intensive care unit status prior to LTx independently predicted poor performance; whereas a body mass index 18.5 kg/m(2) or greater and some degree of preoperative functional independence were protective. Age greater than 60 years, donor tobacco use, and intensive care unit status, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, and mechanical ventilation prior to LTx were associated with an increased risk 1-year mortality, while preoperative functional independence and a body mass index 18.5 to 30 kg/m(2) were protective.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest known study to examine the issue of disability in LTx and its relationship to mortality. Preoperative performance status significantly impacts post-LTx mortality. Patient optimization may improve outcomes and should alter decisions regarding graft selection and allocation.

[Contraindications to lung transplantation: evolving limits?]

In France, the higher frequency of pulmonary sample in organ donors and the enhancement of surgical and perioperative life support techniques, have increased the number procedures and the short term prognosis of lung transplantation (LT). In this setting, the classical contraindications of LT need to be reconsidered. In this article, some of the classical contraindication of LT are confronted to the experience acquired in other solid organ transplantations or from some LT centers. Specific situations such as LT in patients with previous cancer, HIV infection, viral hepatitis, nutritional disorders, acutely ill LT candidates and aging candidates are addressed. Surgical contraindications are not reviewed.