Antimicrobial therapy of Pseudomonas pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis. A prospective evaluation of netilmicin plus azlocillin versus netilmicin plus ticarcillin

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and associated clinical outcomes in individuals with cystic fibrosis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is a cornerstone of infection management. Cystic fibrosis (CF) treatment guidelines recommend AST to select antimicrobial treatments for CF airway infection but its utility in this setting has never been objectively demonstrated.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of primary published articles designed to address two PICO (patient, intervention, comparator, outcome) questions: 1) "For individuals with CF, is clinical response to antimicrobial treatment of bacterial airways infection predictable from AST results available at treatment initiation?" and 2) "For individuals with CF, is clinical response to antimicrobial treatment of bacterial airways infection affected by the method used to guide antimicrobial selection?" Relationships between AST results and clinical response (changes in pulmonary function, weight, signs and symptoms of respiratory tract infection, and time to next event) were assessed for each article and results were compared across articles when possible.

RESULTS

Twenty-five articles describing the results of 20 separate studies, most of which described Pseudomonas aeruginosa treatment, were identified. Thirteen studies described pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) treatment and seven described 'maintenance' of chronic bacterial airways infection. In only three of 16 studies addressing PICO question #1 was there a suggestion that baseline bacterial isolate antimicrobial susceptibility was associated with clinical response to treatment. None of the four studies addressing PICO question #2 suggested that antimicrobial selection methods influenced clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is little evidence that AST predicts the clinical outcome of CF antimicrobial treatment, suggesting a need for careful consideration of current AST use by the CF community.

Intravenous antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis is a multi-system disease characterised by the production of thick secretions causing recurrent pulmonary infection, often with unusual bacteria. Intravenous antibiotics are commonly used in the treatment of acute deteriorations in symptoms (pulmonary exacerbations); however, recently the assumption that exacerbations are due to increases in bacterial burden has been questioned.

OBJECTIVES

To establish if intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis improve short- and long-term clinical outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews and ongoing trials registers.Date of last search of Cochrane trials register: 27 July 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials and the first treatment cycle of cross-over studies comparing intravenous antibiotics (given alone or in an antibiotic combination) with placebo, inhaled or oral antibiotics for people with cystic fibrosis experiencing a pulmonary exacerbation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The authors assessed studies for eligibility and risk of bias and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 40 studies involving 1717 participants. The quality of the included studies was largely poor and, with a few exceptions, these comprised of mainly small, inadequately reported studies.When comparing treatment with a single antibiotic to a combined antibiotic regimen, those participants receiving a combination of antibiotics experienced a greater improvement in lung function when considered as a whole group across a number of different measurements of lung function, but with very low quality evidence. When limited to the four placebo-controlled studies (n = 214), no difference was observed, again with very low quality evidence. With regard to the review's remaining primary outcomes, there was no effect upon time to next exacerbation and no studies in any comparison reported on quality of life. There were no effects on the secondary outcomes weight or adverse effects. When comparing specific antibiotic combinations there were no significant differences between groups on any measure. In the comparisons between intravenous and nebulised antibiotic or oral antibiotic (low quality evidence), there were no significant differences between groups on any measure. No studies in any comparison reported on quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The quality of evidence comparing intravenous antibiotics with placebo is poor. No specific antibiotic combination can be considered to be superior to any other, and neither is there evidence showing that the intravenous route is superior to the inhaled or oral routes. There remains a need to understand host-bacteria interactions and in particular to understand why many people fail to fully respond to treatment.

Optimization of anti-pseudomonal antibiotics for cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations: II. cephalosporins and penicillins

Acute pulmonary exacerbations (APE) are well-described complications of cystic fibrosis (CF) and are associated with progressive morbidity and mortality. Despite aggressive management with two or more intravenous anti-pseudomonal agents, approximately 25% of exacerbations will result in a loss of lung function. The aim of this review is to provide an evidence-based summary of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD), tolerability, and efficacy studies utilizing anti-pseudomonal cephalosporins (i.e., ceftazidime and cefepime) and penicillins (i.e., piperacillin-tazobactam and ticarcillin-clavulanate) in the treatment of APE and to identify areas where further study is warranted. The ceftazidime and cefepime dosing ranges from the literature are 200-400 mg/kg/day divided every 6-8 hr, maximum 8-12 g/day, and 150-200 mg/kg/day divided every 6-8 hr, up to 6-8 g/day, respectively. The literature supported dosing ranges for piperacillin and ticarcillin are 350-600 mg/kg/day divided every 4 hr, maximum 18-24 g/day of piperacillin component, and 400-750 mg/kg/day divided every 6 hr, up to 24-30 g/day of ticarcillin component, respectively. As a large portion of CF patients will not regain their lung function following an APE, we suggest the need to optimize antibiotic dosing and dosing regimens used to treat an APE in efforts to improve outcomes for CF patients infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Future studies are needed to determine the clinical efficacy of higher than FDA-approved doses of ceftazidime, cefepime, and ticarcillin-clavulanate in APE. The usefulness of high dose piperacillin (>600 mg/kg/day) may be limited due to treatment-related adverse effects. Further understanding of these adverse effects in CF patients is needed.

Approaches to the Treatment of Initial Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in Children Who Have Cystic Fibrosis

Pseudomonas aeruginosa remains an important cause of pulmonary disease in patients who have cystic fibrosis. The development of antimicrobial therapy directed against this organism has resulted in the preservation of lung function and improved longevity. Efficacy has been demonstrated with agents administered via parenteral, inhaled, and oral routes. The optimal antibiotic regimen remains unclear. There is an active effort to use randomized, controlled clinical trials to rigorously test effective antibiotic for the eradication of P aeruginosa in young children or at least to delay the establishment of chronic infection.

Oral ciprofloxacin vs. intravenous ceftazidime plus tobramycin in pediatric cystic fibrosis patients: comparison of antipseudomonas efficacy and assessment of safety with ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cystic Fibrosis Study Group

BACKGROUND

More data on the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin in pediatric cystic fibrosis patients are needed.

METHODS

One hundred eight pediatric cystic fibrosis patients (ages 5 to 17 years) with acute bronchopulmonary exacerbations entered a randomized multicenter trial designed to compare the safety and efficacy of antipseudomonas therapy with oral ciprofloxacin (15 mg/kg twice daily; maximum dosage 750 mg twice daily) or intravenous ceftazidime plus tobramycin (CAZ/TM) for 14 days.

RESULTS

Clinical improvement was observed in 93% of patients treated with oral ciprofloxacin and in 96% of those receiving parenteral therapy. Transient suppression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was achieved in 63% of patients at the end of the course of iv CAZ/TM therapy and in 24% receiving ciprofloxacin. Ultrasound examination and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging scans showed no evidence of cartilage toxicity in any of the ciprofloxacin-treated patients. Musculoskeletal adverse events were reported with similar frequency in the two groups of patients (7% in the group receiving ciprofloxacin therapy and 11% in the IV CAZ/TM group). The only sustained musculoskeletal symptom was a case of synovitis in a patient receiving parenteral CAZ/TM.

CONCLUSION

Ciprofloxacin thus appears to be safe and effective for use in young patients with bronchopulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis.

Ciprofloxacin as antipseudomonal treatment in patients with cystic fibrosis

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy and safety of oral ciprofloxacin as a maintenance antipseudomonal therapy were evaluated in 44 patients with cystic fibrosis who had completed a 14-day regimen of intensive hospital therapy with intravenous ceftazidime and amikacin, supplemented by amikacin inhalation therapy.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients were randomly assigned to oral ciprofloxacin alone (Group I) and 23 received ciprofloxacin plus inhaled amikacin (Group II).

RESULTS

Negative sputum cultures were achieved in 34 patients (77%) at the end of intensive therapy (19 Group I and 15 Group II) and were sustained after 3 months of maintenance therapy in 5 of the 19 responders in Group I (26%) and in 8 of the 15 responders in Group II (53%). Resistance to ciprofloxacin was found in 7 of 31 (23%) sputum isolates at the end of ciprofloxacin therapy. During maintenance therapy, continued improvement in clinical symptoms was observed in 14 patients in both treatment groups; 6 in each group had further improvements whereas only 4 patients were clinical failures. There was no correlation between clinical outcome and either elimination of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from sputum culture or development of ciprofloxacin resistance. Both maintenance regimens were well-tolerated by this population of patients which included 28 children younger than 15 years of age. There were no severe or serious adverse events, no signs of quinolone-related arthropathy and no growth impairment.

CONCLUSION

Ciprofloxacin was efficacious, safe and well-tolerated as maintenance antipseudomonal therapy in cystic fibrosis patients. These results suggest further evaluation of ciprofloxacin as an oral maintenance therapy is warranted.

Cystic fibrosis, pathophysiological and clinical aspects

Cystic fibrosis is a lethal, hereditary, until recently little understood disease, which leads to progressive functional disturbances in various organs, including the lungs, liver and pancreas. Knowledge of the genetic and cellular abnormalities is rapidly progressing, but therapy is still symptomatic and based on insufficiently controlled and short-term studies. At present the therapeutic approach aims to combat respiratory infections by optimal antibiotic therapy, combined with techniques to promote sputum evacuation. Additional measures attempt to optimise both nutritional state and physical condition. Median survival has improved from approximately 1 year to about 25 years during the past 3 decades. This article summarises present information on disease mechanisms and treatment.

Strategies and perspectives in treatment of respiratory infections

Bronchopulmonary infections in CF have a number of special features. The pathophysiology is determined by consequences of the basic CF defect and interactions with host defence systems, leading to chronic inflammation induced by Staphylococci and subsequently Pseudomonas. This results in lung tissue damage, various complications and eventually respiratory insufficiency. Policy of treatment is to combat infectious exacerbations and lung tissue destruction as much as possible. Factors in optimal treatment such as strategies, indications for therapy and selection of antibiotics are discussed.

Antipseudomonal therapy in cystic fibrosis: aztreonam and amikacin versus ceftazidime and amikacin administered intravenously followed by oral ciprofloxacin

In order to determine the optimal antipseudomonal therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis aztreonam plus amikacin was compared to ceftazidime plus amikacin, and these two-week hospital regimens were followed by oral ciprofloxacin given for four weeks. Fifty-six cases of acute pulmonary exacerbation of the disease in 42 patients associated with isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from the sputum were randomly treated with either aztreonam or ceftazidime (300mg/kg/day i.v.; maximum daily dose 12g) in combination with amikacin (36mg/kg/day i.v.; maximum daily dose 1,500mg). Other aspects of the two-week treatment were constant. The two therapy groups were comparable in all respects. Both regimens were well tolerated and resulted in similar improvements in clinical, bacteriologic, radiologic and laboratory findings, and pulmonary function. Fifty patients could be reevaluated after subsequent outpatient therapy consisting of oral ciprofloxacin (30mg/kg/day; maximum daily dose 1,500mg) given for four weeks. During this period, the clinical and laboratory improvements persisted, and the rate of eradication of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from sputum decreased from 62% to 34%. Ciprofloxacin was well tolerated and there was no drug toxicity or serious adverse effect. In the 25 prepubertal patients there was neither subjective nor objective evidence of skeletal drug toxicity. In patients with cystic fibrosis, aztreonam or ceftazidime in combination with amikacin represents an effective and safe systemic anti-pseudomonal therapy. Subsequent oral ciprofloxacin therapy for four weeks prolongs the beneficial effects and is well tolerated.

Efficacy of inhaled amikacin as adjunct to intravenous combination therapy (ceftazidime and amikacin) in cystic fibrosis

Eighty-seven patients with cystic fibrosis were admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of pulmonary symptoms associated with isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from sputum. The patients were randomly allocated to receive intravenously administered ceftazidime (250 mg/kg/day) and amikacin (33 mg/kg/day) alone or with inhaled amikacin (100 mg twice a day). Other aspects of the 2-week treatment were constant. The two therapy groups were comparable in all aspects. At the completion of therapy, the addition of aerosolized amikacin produced temporary eradication of P. aeruginosa in 70% of the patients, compared with 41% in the intravenous therapy only group (P less than 0.02). Suppression of P. aeruginosa in sputum cultures was correlated with the amikacin sputum concentrations. However, both regimens resulted in similar improvements in clinical, radiologic, laboratory, and pulmonary function measurements, and within 4 to 6 weeks most patients were recolonized with P. aeruginosa. There was no serious toxicity or adverse effect. In patients with cystic fibrosis, the addition of aerosol aminoglycoside to systemic antipseudomonal combination therapy is not clinically beneficial.