Age-related growth hormone-releasing activity of growth hormone secretagogues in humans

Relationships of DEX/CRH and GHRH test results to the outcome of depression--preliminary results suggest the GHRH test may predict relapse after discharge

To explore and compare hypothalamic-pituitary-somatotropic (HPS) axis function and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis function in depression, the dexamethasone (DEX)/CRH test and growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) test were prospectively performed on patients with depression at the time of admission and discharge. The patients who relapsed within six months after discharge exhibited significantly lower growth hormone (GH) responses to GHRH at the time of discharge than those who did not relapse. There were no significant correlations between GH response to GHRH and the results of DEX/CRH tests after controlling for age, sex, and body mass index. The findings of this study suggest that results of the GHRH test may be a predictor of future relapse in patients with depression.

Growth hormone levels in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in adulthood

Current guidelines for the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD) state that the diagnosis must be proven biochemically by provocative testing that is done within the appropriate clinical context. The need for reliance on provocative testing is based on evidence that the evaluation of spontaneous growth hormone (GH) secretion over 24 h and the measurement of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels do not distinguish between normal and GHD subjects. Regarding IGF-I, it has been demonstrated that very low levels in patients highly suspected for GHD (i.e., patients with childhood-onset, severe GHD, or with multiple hypopituitarism acquired in adulthood) may be considered definitive evidence for severe GHD obviating the need for provocative tests. However, normal IGF-I levels do not rule out severe GHD and therefore adults suspected for GHD and with normal IGF-I levels must undergo a provocative test of GH secretion. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is the test of choice, with severe GHD being defined by a GH peak less than 3 microg/l, the cut-off that distinguishes normal from GHD adults. The ITT is contraindicated in the presence of ischemic heart disease, seizure disorders, and in the elderly. Other tests are as reliable as the ITT, provided they are used with appropriate cut-off limits. Glucagon stimulation, a classical test, and especially new maximal tests such as GHRH in combination with arginine or GHS (i.e., GHRP-6) have well-defined cut-off limits, are reproducible, are independent of age and gender, and are able to distinguish between normal and GHD subjects. The confounding effect of overweight or obesity on the interpretation of the GH response to provocative tests needs to be considered as the somatotropic response to all stimuli is negatively correlated with body mass index. Appropriate cut-offs for lean, overweight, and obese subjects must be used in order to avoid false-positive diagnoses of severe GHD in obese adults.

Biological, physiological, pathophysiological, and pharmacological aspects of ghrelin

Ghrelin is a peptide predominantly produced by the stomach. Ghrelin displays strong GH-releasing activity. This activity is mediated by the activation of the so-called GH secretagogue receptor type 1a. This receptor had been shown to be specific for a family of synthetic, peptidyl and nonpeptidyl GH secretagogues. Apart from a potent GH-releasing action, ghrelin has other activities including stimulation of lactotroph and corticotroph function, influence on the pituitary gonadal axis, stimulation of appetite, control of energy balance, influence on sleep and behavior, control of gastric motility and acid secretion, and influence on pancreatic exocrine and endocrine function as well as on glucose metabolism. Cardiovascular actions and modulation of proliferation of neoplastic cells, as well as of the immune system, are other actions of ghrelin. Therefore, we consider ghrelin a gastrointestinal peptide contributing to the regulation of diverse functions of the gut-brain axis. So, there is indeed a possibility that ghrelin analogs, acting as either agonists or antagonists, might have clinical impact.

Hexarelin modulates the expression of growth hormone secretagogue receptor type 1a mRNA at hypothalamic and pituitary sites

Ghrelin and the synthetic growth hormone secretagogues (GHSs) activate a G-protein-coupled receptor (GHS-R) originally cloned from the pituitary, but which is also expressed in the hypothalamus, in other areas of the brain and in numerous peripheral tissues. Several studies have shown that growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH) is necessary for GHSs to exert maximal GH release in vivo. The exact mechanism of this synergism is not clear. Previous data suggest that GHSs can affect pituitary GHS-R mRNA expression; however, it is unknown whether this effect is age dependent and whether hypothalamic GHS-Rs are also affected. In this study, we tested whether (a) the synthetic GHS hexarelin regulates mRNA expression of its own receptor at the pituitary and/or hypothalamus and whether this effect is age dependent, and (b) whether short-term treatment with GHRH or, conversely, passive immunization against GHRH affects pituitary GHS-R1a mRNA expression in infant (10 days old) and young adult rats. GHS-R1a mRNA expression was measured with competitive reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Hexarelin treatment significantly increased pituitary and hypothalamic GHS-R1a mRNA levels in normal infant rats, but not in normal young adult rats. In addition, hexarelin administration also stimulated pituitary GHS-R1a mRNA in infant as well as in young adult rats passively immunized against GHRH. GHRH treatment significantly enhanced pituitary GHS-R1a mRNA expression in GHRH-deprived young adult rats, though it did not affect the basal levels of GHS-R1a mRNA in normal infant and adult rats. These data further support the hypothesis that GHRH can affect GHS-R1a expression and that hexarelin upregulates the expression of its own receptor at the pituitary as well as the hypothalamus in an age-dependent fashion.

Ageing, growth hormone and physical performance

Human ageing is associated to a declining activity of the GH/IGF-I axis and to several changes in body composition, function and metabolism which show strict similarities with those of younger adults with pathological GH deficiency. The age-related changes of the GH/IGF-I axis activity are mainly dependent on age-related variations in the hypothalamic control of somatotroph function, which is also affected by changes in peripheral hormones and metabolic input. The term "somatopause" indicates the potential link between the age-related decline in GH and IGF-I levels and changes in body composition, structural functions and metabolism which characterise ageing. Physical exercise is an important environmental regulator of the GH/IGF-I axis activity. Increased physical fitness and regular training increase GH production in adults, while the GH response to aerobic or resistance exercise is reduced with age. In older subjects regular exercise has the potential to improve overall fitness and quality of life and is also associated to decreased morbidity and increased longevity. Similar effects are seen following GH therapy in adult deficiency. This assumption led to clinical trials focusing on rhGH and/or rhlGF-I as potential anabolic drug interventions in elderly subjects. To restore the activity of GH/IGF-I axis with anabolic, anti-ageing purposes, attention has been also paid to GH-releasing molecules such as GHRH, orally active synthetic GH-secretagogues (GHS) and, more recently, to the endogenous natural GHS, ghrelin, which exerts several important biological actions, including the regulation of metabolic balance and orexigenic effects. At present, however, there is no definite evidence that "frail" elderly subjects really benefit from restoring GH and IGF-I levels within the young adult range by treatment with rhGH, rhlGF-I, GHRH or GHS. In this article the alteration of the GH/IGF-I axis activity during ageing is revised taking into account the role of physical activity as a regulator of the axis function and considering the effects of the restoration of GH and IGF-I circulating levels on body composition and physical performance.

Impairment of GH responsiveness to GH-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP-6) in Prader-Willi syndrome

The aim of this study was to evaluate the GH-releasing activity of a synthetic hexapeptide, GHRP-6, in the Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). Sixteen PWS patients (7 males and 9 females, aged 12.7-38.3 yr), 15 with essential obesity (OB) (7 males and 8 females, aged 12.9-42.9 yr), and 8 short normal children (SN; 3 males and 5 females, aged 10.2-14.3 yr) underwent 2 tests on separate occasions, being challenged with GHRP-6 (1 microg/kg, iv) or GHRH (1 microg/kg, iv)+PD (60 or 120 mg for children or adults, po). Moreover, in 11 patients with PWS and in the group of SN, the GH response to at least 2 stimulation tests had been previously determined. GH was analyzed either as mean peak values (GHp, mcg/l), or as the area under the curve (AUC, mcg/l/h) and the net incremental area under the curve (nAUC, mcg/l/h). In the group of PWS subjects, GH responses to both GHRP-6 (GHp: 11.4+/-2.0; AUC: 588+/-113; nAUC: 483+/-108) and GHRH+PD (GHp: 7.3+/-1.8; AUC: 486+/-122; nAUC: 371+/-250) were significantly lower than those observed either in OB (GHRP-6: GHp: 25.7+/-3.2, p<0.003; AUC: 1833+/-305, p<0.005; nAUC: 1640+/-263, p<0.0001. GHRH+PD: GHp: 15.1+/-2.4, p<0.009; AUC: 1249+/-248, p<0.003; nAUC: 918+/-230, p<0.006) or in SN patients (GHRP-6: GHp: 39.1+/-3.1, p<0.0001; AUC: 2792+/-158, p<0.0001; nAUC: 2705+/-165, p<0.00005. GHRH+PD: GHp: 27.5+/-3.7, p<0.0001; AUC: 1873+/-251, p<0.0001; nAUC: 1692+/-219, p<0.0005). Unlike control groups, in PWS patients GH levels after GHRP-6 did not differ from those obtained after GHRH+PD. Interestingly, low IGF-I values were present in all PWS subjects. Furthermore, no patient with PWS showed normal GH response to the previously performed GH stimulation tests. As already reported, GH release after GHRP-6 or GHRH+PD was significantly lower in OB than in SN subjects. In conclusion, our data indicate that: 1) GH response to GHRP-6 is clearly impaired in PWS; 2) the blunted GH responses to the provocative stimuli in PWS are not an artifact of obesity; 3) short stature in PWS is caused by a complex dysfunction of the hypothalamo-pituitary structures.

Insulin-Like growth factor I: implications in aging

According to the somatomedin model, growth hormone (GH)-dependent hepatic synthesis is responsible for maintaining circulating insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I levels. On the other hand, the local autocrine/paracrine IGF-I expression in peripheral tissue is generally GH-independent and reflects the effects of various and tissue-specific trophic hormones. Circulating IGF-I levels undergo important age-related variations increasing at puberty and decreasing, thereafter, to low levels in the elderly. Low IGF-I levels in the elderly mainly reflect impaired somatotroph secretion but the decline in gonadal sex steroid levels, some protein and micronutrients malnutrition as well as age-dependent variations in IGF-binding proteins may also play a role in the age-related decrease in IGF-I activity. This, in turn, partially accounts for age-related changes in bones, muscles, cardiovascular system, central nervous system and the immune system. However, it is currently unclear whether treatment with exogenous IGF-I can retard or reverse age-related changes in body structure and function.

Frailty and the older man

Frailty is a wasting syndrome of advanced age that leaves a person vulnerable to falls, functional decline, morbidity, and mortality. The cause of this syndrome is complex but likely has a biologic basis. Studies by the authors' research group have validated a phenotype of frailty [table: see text] and have established a gender difference in prevalence with women twice as likely to develop the syndrome as men. Using a biologic model that includes sarcopenia, neuroendocrine decline, and immune dysfunction as potential causes, several physiologic gender differences may explain these differing levels of frailty. First, higher baseline levels of muscle mass may protect men from reaching a threshold of weakness and muscle mass loss that may put them into a category of frailty. Specific neuroendocrine and hormonal factors that may make men less likely to develop frailty than women include testosterone and GH, which may provide advantages in muscle mass maintenance, and cortisol, which is likely less dysregulated in older men as compared to older women. There is also evidence of immune system dimorphism that is, in part, responsive to sex steroids, perhaps making men more vulnerable to sepsis and infection and women more vulnerable to chronic inflammatory conditions and muscle mass loss. The net effect of the hormonal dysregulation and immune system dysfunction is an accelerated loss of muscle mass. There is also evidence that lower levels of activity and lower caloric intake in women as compared to men may also influence the phenotype of frailty and make women more vulnerable then men to the syndrome.

Hexarelin-induced growth hormone response in short stature. Comparison with growth hormone-releasing hormone plus pyridostigmine and arginine plus estrogen

Hexarelin (HEX) is a synthetic hexapeptide with strong GH-stimulating activity. We evaluated GH response (expressed as maximum value after stimulus [Cmax] and as area under the curve [AUC]) to HEX at the doses of 1 microg/kg i.v. (HEX 1) and 2 microg/kg i.v. (HEX 2), in comparison with the responses to GHRH (1 microg/kg i.v.) + pyridostigmine (PD, 60 mg po) and to arginine (ARG, 0.5 mg/kg i.v.) + ethinylestradiol (EE, 1 mg/day po for 3 days before the stimulation), in 5 subjects with familial short stature (FSS), 11 with constitutional growth delay (CGD), 6 with GH neurosecretory dysfunction (NSD), and 5 with isolated growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Cmax and AUC after HEX 1 were 26.8+/-10.5 ng/ml and 1448+/-514 ng/min x ml in FSS, 23.6+/-14.4 ng/ml and 1146+/-750 ng/min x ml in CGD, 36.9+/-21.5 ng/ml and 2048+/-1288 ng/min x ml in NSD, 9.4+/-5.8 ng/ml and 498+/-200 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax and AUC in FSS and CGD, p<0.05 vs GHD). Cmax and AUC after HEX 2 were 37.7+/-16 ng/ml and 1979+/-888 ng/min x ml in FSS, 32.5+/-16.2 ng/ml and 1613+/-237 ng/min x ml in CGD, 39.7+/-20.7 ng/ml and 2366+/-1569 ng/min xml in NSD, 13.4+/-4.2 ng/ml and 645+/-293 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax in FSS, CGD and NSD p<0.01 vs GHD; AUC in NSD, p<05 vs GHD). Cmax and AUC after GHRH+/-PD were 46.6+/-8.8 ng/ml and 3294+/-1031 ng/min x ml in FSS, 25.9+/-11.2 ng/ml and 1464+/-735 ng/min x ml in CGD, 38.8+/-21.7 ng/ml and 2428+/-1399 ng/min x ml in NSD, 8.4+/-6.2 ng/ml and 685+/-572 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax and AUC in FSS, p<0.001 vs CGD and GHD; Cmax in CGD and NSD, p<0.001 vs GHD). Cmax and AUC after ARG+EE were 21.3+/-4.2 ng/ml and 1432+/-514 ng/min x ml in FSS, 14.8+/-10 ng/ml and 805+/-489 ng/min x ml in CGD, 22.2+/-12.8 ng/ml and 1199+/-309 ng/min x ml in NSD, 4.6+/-2.5 ng/ml and 247+/-191 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax and AUC in FSS, CGD and NSD, p<0.01 vs GHD). Specificity was 62% for HEX 1 and 75% for HEX 2, GHRH+PD and ARG+EE. From a diagnostic point of view, HEX 1 + HEX 2 was the association with the largest percentage of false positives (20% in FSS, 27% in CGD and 33% in NSD), HEX 1 +GHRH+PD resulted in 9% in CGD, while the combined use of HEX 1 or HEX 2 with GHRH+PD or ARG+EE and of GHRH+PD with ARG+EE did not show false positive responses.

IN CONCLUSION

I) the most effective dose of HEX was 2 microg/kg i.v.; 2) HEX did not show more specificity than GHRH+PD and ARG+EE; 3) the association of GHRH+PD with ARG+EE could yield the best results at lower costs, confirming these tests as first-line tools in evaluating GH secretion.

Growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor (GHRH-R) and growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R) mRNA levels during postnatal development in male and female rats

Experimental evidence suggests that differential pituitary sensitivity to hypothalamic signals exerts a role in mediating both age and sex dependent patterns of growth hormone (GH) release and synthesis. One mechanism by which pituitary sensitivity to hypothalamic GH regulators could be modified is by the differential synthesis of their pituitary receptors. In the present report we therefore studied the age and sex dependency of the expression of receptors for two known stimulators of GH release, growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and the synthetic peptidyl and non-peptidyl GH secretagogues (GHSs). Pituitary GHRH receptor (GHRH-R) and GHS receptor (GHS-R) mRNA levels were measured by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in male and female rats at postnatal day 1, 10, 30 and 75. We also examined the age- and sex-dependent expression of the GHS-R in whole hypothalamic extracts, since the GHS-R is also expressed in a variety of nuclei within the hypothalamus and has been linked to central regulation of the GH-axis. Pituitary GHRH-R mRNA concentrations were age-dependent; the highest levels were observed in d1 pituitaries and then declined with age, reaching a nadir by d30. These results are in concordance with the age-related decline in pituitary GHRH sensitivity. In contrast, the ontogenic pattern of GHS-R expression was bimodal; GHS-R mRNA concentrations in dl and d30 pituitaries were approximately twice those at d10 and d75. These results mirror the transient increase in GHS sensitivity observed around the onset of puberty, suggesting that gonadal steroids mediate GHS-R expression. GHRH-R mRNA levels were comparable in males and females within each age while GHS-R mRNA levels were gender dependent. At d30, male GHS-R mRNA levels were 30% greater than in their female counterparts. This was reversed at d75, when females had 89% more GHS-R mRNA per pituitary and 65% more per somatotrope than did age-matched males. These sexual differences further support a role for gonadal steroids in the modulation of pituitary GHS-R synthesis. The ontogenic and gender-specific pattern of hypothalamic GHS-R expression differed from that observed for the pituitary. Hypothalamic GHS-R mRNA levels increased with age but exhibited no significant sex difference at each age tested. Taken together, these data demonstrate that changes in the levels of pituitary GHS-R mRNA, but not GHRH-R mRNA, are associated with changes in the gonadal steroid environment, thereby implicating the GHS/GHS-R signalling system as a control point in the establishment and maintenance of sexually dimorphic patterns of GH secretion.