Orthodontic Treatment of a Congenitally Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisor

Nonextraction anterior open bite treatment with distalization and intrusion

This case report describes successful orthodontic retreatment for vertical control with nonextraction orthodontic therapy. A 31-year-old woman complained of anterior open bite and crowding. She had slightly protrusive lips but wanted to correct her malocclusion without extraction. Two palatal temporary skeletal anchorage devices were used for the distalization of the maxillary arch along with posterior intrusion. Mandibular distalization was performed with Class III elastics. The duration of active treatment was 22 months. The plain and efficient mechanics used contributed to the effective distalization of both arches, the intrusion of the maxillary posterior teeth, and favorable profile changes. The results were still stable at the five-year follow-up period.

Successful treatment modalities for missing lateral incisors- A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Effective management of Missing lateral incisor has remained a challenge for the clinicians. A multi-disciplinary approach involving orthodontist, restorative dental specialist, pediatric dental specialist, periodontist, oral surgeon and general dentist has proved ideal. Our aim is to review the ultimate esthetic success, and long term survival results between the orthodontic and restorative management of missing lateral incisor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of the published articles pertaining to the topic of interest was done. Searches were carried out in four different databases since February 2021 to April 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 580 references were found from searches conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and Web of Science, and 19 articles were selected and analyzed fully, after screening the title and abstract, 6 articles were included for the study.

CONCLUSION

An essential orthodontic space closure in combination with modern aesthetic prosthetic tooth replacement techniques has been reported to achieve greater success.

Canine substitution of congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors in Class I and Class III malocclusions by using skeletal anchorage

INTRODUCTION

This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate canine substitution supported by skeletal anchorage as a viable treatment protocol for patients with maxillary lateral incisor agenesis (MLIA) and skeletal Class I or Class III.

METHODS

Patients (n = 30) who met the following criteria were recruited: (1) bilateral MLIA or unilateral MLIA with a riziform contralateral incisor with a planned extraction; (2) skeletal Class I or Class III; and (3) dentoalveolar discrepancy in the mandible <5 mm. The archwire sequence routine was administered, combined with a rapid palatal expander, temporary intraoral skeletal anchorage device, and intermaxillary traction with Class III elastics. The results of the cephalometric analyses, peer assessment rating indexes, and the patient's smile self-evaluation using the visual analog scale were compared between initial and final treatments.

RESULTS

This study indicated that closing the space in patients with Class I or Class III malocclusion by using temporary intraoral skeletal anchorage devices in the mandible, along with Class III elastics, yielded satisfactory outcomes. Proper occlusion was established by mesialization of the maxillary teeth and correction of the intermaxillary discrepancy, thereby yielding beneficial and significant cephalometric changes after the treatment. The soft tissue profile was maintained when it was harmonious before the treatment and improved posttreatment in patients in whom the profile was initially inharmonious. All occlusions improved, as evidenced by the peer assessment rating index. Smile esthetics were also enhanced after orthodontic treatment for all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Canine substitution may be safely offered to patients with Class I and Class III skeletal pattern and MLIA.

Torturous path of an elastic gap band: Interdisciplinary approach to orthodontic treatment for a young patient who lost both maxillary central incisors after do-it-yourself treatment

Spacing between the maxillary anterior teeth is a common concern for young patients and their parents. Patients often consider a diastema to be an annoying but minor problem; they might consult their general dentists for help, or try to address the issue themselves by applying elastic "gap bands." Moreover, parents, without any informed consent, sometimes accept this erroneous method as an easy and inexpensive treatment approach. A 9-year-old boy had severe acute periodontitis involving the maxillary central incisors caused by the placement of an elastic band and its apical migration. Despite periodontal and surgical interventions, the maxillary central incisors were finally extracted, and the patient started orthodontic treatment. The orthodontic treatment plan included maxillary lateral incisor substitution to replace the lost central incisors and mesialization of the maxillary posterior dentition. An interdisciplinary approach with excellent cooperation among the orthodontist, general dentist, and other dental specialists obtained an esthetically pleasing and optimized functional result. Treating the diastema between the anterior teeth with elastic gap bands and without fixed orthodontic appliances should be avoided. Patients should seek proper orthodontic advice for even small-scale orthodontic problems to prevent catastrophic outcomes, as exhibited in this case report.

Ceramic Laminate Veneers for Reestablishment of Esthetics in Case of Lateral Incisor Agenesis

The increasing demand of patients looking for esthetics has resulted in the development of several techniques to restore anterior teeth. Conservative treatments should always be the first therapeutic option for the solution of aesthetic problems involving morphological changes and usually provide the result that the patient expects. In this context, ceramic laminate veneers, also known as "contact lenses," are capable to provide an extremely faithful reproduction of natural teeth with great color stability and periodontal biocompatibility. Minimal or no preparation veneers are heavily advertised as the answer to patients' cosmetic needs, when properly indicated by the dentist. This paper reports a clinical case where lateral incisor agenesis was aesthetically corrected using ceramic laminates.

[How to treat hypoplasia of the lateral upper incisors by canine substitution : a clinical case]

INTRODUCTION

Facing a patient with a morphological or numerical disorder of the lateral upper incisors (mainly pegged or missing incisor), the orthodontist has to choose between two treatment options : either spatial planning for a prosthetic restoration, or space closure with substitution of the lateral incisors by canines; the choice depends on the clinical context we are faced with. Each treatment option has its advantages and disadvantages and it is hard to tip the balance in one direction or another.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This article illustrates the rationale for therapeutic management of space closure, in a patient with skeletal class III, with hypoplastic and peg-shaped upper lateral incisors.

Genetic variations in MMP9 and MMP13 contribute to tooth agenesis in a Brazilian population

We investigated the association between polymorphisms in the MMP2 (rs243865), MMP9 (rs17576), and MMP13 (rs2252070) genes with tooth agenesis in humans. Two hundred eighty-five unrelated individuals (202 controls without tooth agenesis and 83 cases with tooth agenesis) were evaluated in a cross-sectional single-center study. The study participants were recruited through the Pediatric Dental Clinics of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Genotyping of the selected polymorphisms for MMPs was carried out by real-time PCR using the Taqman assay method from genomic DNA isolated from buccal epithelial cells of all the studied individuals. There was no significant association of MMP2 genotype or allele distribution with tooth agenesis or its absence. For MMP9, a significant difference in allele frequency was evident between the two groups (P = 0.05). With regard to the affected side, there was a significant difference between unilateral tooth agenesis and the control group in the distribution of MMP9 (P = 0.05). Also, there was a significant difference in MMP9 distribution between tooth agenesis in the maxilla and control individuals (P = 0.03). The genotype distribution of MMP13 differed significantly between the group with unilateral tooth agenesis and the controls (P = 0.01). Our findings provide evidence that MMP9 and MMP13 may be involved in tooth agenesis.

Congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors: update on the functional and esthetic parameters of patients treated with implants or space closure and teeth recontouring

Maxillary lateral incisor agenesis (MLIA) is a condition that affects both dental esthetics and function in young patients, and represents an important challenge for clinicians. Although several treatment options are available, the mesial repositioning of the canines followed by teeth recontouring into lateral incisors; or space opening/maintenance followed by implant placement have recently emerged as two important treatment approaches. In this article, the current and latest literature has been reviewed in order to summarize the functional and esthetic outcomes obtained with these two forms of treatment of MLIA patients in recent years. Indications, clinical limitations and the most important parameters to achieve the best possible results with each treatment modality are also discussed. Within the limitations of this review, it is not possible to assert at this point in time that one treatment approach is more advantageous than the other. Long-term followup studies comparing the existing treatment options are still lacking in the literature, and they are necessary to shed some light on the issue. It is possible, however, to state that adequate multidisciplinary diagnosis and planning are imperative to define the treatment option that will provide the best individual results for patients with MLIA.

Smile attractiveness of patients treated for congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors as rated by dentists, laypersons, and the patients themselves

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Esthetic judgments can help dental professionals better understand how attentive people are to their own smiles and those of others.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the smile attractiveness of patients treated for maxillary lateral incisor agenesis compared with that of individuals with a complete dentition.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Photographs were made of the smiles of patients with maxillary lateral incisor agenesis who were treated with space closure and teeth recontouring (n=26) or space opening and implants (n=20) and of a control group with a complete dentition (n=22). Both laypersons and dentists assessed smile attractiveness by using a visual analog scale. Patients and controls also assessed the level of satisfaction with their own smile. Assessments were performed twice, and the reliability of the method was determined with Cronbach α and intraclass correlation. Multifactorial and 1-way ANOVA were used to analyze smile attractiveness and participant satisfaction, followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test (α=.05).

RESULTS

Attractiveness ratings by dentists and laypersons did not differ significantly among the study groups (P=.64). The ratings of male dentists and female laypersons differed significantly from those of other evaluators (P=.01). Patients with space closure and teeth recontouring were significantly more satisfied than controls (P=.002). No significant differences were found between the patients with implants and controls or between the patients with implants and those with space closure and teeth recontouring.

CONCLUSIONS

The smiles of patients with maxillary lateral incisor agenesis were judged to be as attractive as those of the controls. Male dentists were the most critical raters, closely followed by female laypersons. All participants had high levels of satisfaction with their own smile; patients treated with space closure and teeth recontouring were the most satisfied.

TGFB3 and BMP4 polymorphism are associated with isolated tooth agenesis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of the polymorphisms in the TGFB3 gene (rs2268626) and the BMP4 gene (rs17563) with isolated human tooth agenesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and seventy-five unrelated individuals (125 control individuals without tooth agenesis and 50 cases with tooth agenesis) were evaluated using a case-control design. The participants of the study were recruited through the Dental School of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Genotyping of the selected polymorphisms for TGFB3 (48 individuals with tooth agenesis and 125 control cases) and BMP4 (46 individuals with tooth agenesis and 88 control cases) were carried out by real-time PCR using the Taqman assay method from a genomic DNA isolated from buccal epithelial cells of all individuals.

RESULTS

Significant statistical differences were found for genotype frequencies between tooth agenesis and TGFB3 control samples (p = 0.026). In addition, significant differences were also observed for allele and genotype frequencies between unilateral tooth agenesis and TGFB3 control samples (p = 0.014 and 0.004 for allele and genotype frequencies, respectively). For BMP4, genotype distribution had a statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.047). The GG genotype of BMP4 was more frequent in individuals with three or more missing teeth than in the control group (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that polymorphisms in the TGFB3 gene and in BMP4 genes contribute to tooth agenesis. Nonetheless, the extents to which this polymorphism may actually contribute to the tooth agenesis status should be clarified.