Effect of intracerebroventricular injections of prolactin-releasing peptide on prolactin release and stress-related responses in steers

Genes related to heat tolerance in cattle-a review

Heat stress is described as the cumulative detrimental effect caused by an imbalance between heat production within the body and heat dissipation. When cattle are exposed to heat stress with skin surface temperatures exceeding 35 °C, gene networks within and across cells respond to environmental heat loads with both intra and extracellular signals that coordinate cellular and whole-animal metabolism changes to store heat and rapidly increase evaporative heat loss. In this study, we examined evidence from genes known to be associated with heat tolerance (Hsp70, HSF1, HspB8, SOD1, PRLH, ATP1A1, MTOR, and EIF2AK4). This information could serve as valuable resource material for breeding programs aimed at increasing the thermotolerance of cattle.

Functions of two distinct "prolactin-releasing peptides" evolved from a common ancestral gene

Prolactin-releasing peptide (PrRP) is one of the RF-amide peptides and was originally identified in the bovine hypothalamus as a stimulator of prolactin (PRL) release. Independently, another RF-amide peptide was found in Japanese crucian carp and named Carassius-RFa (C-RFa), which shows high homology to PrRP and stimulates PRL secretion in teleost fish. Therefore, C-RFa has been recognized as fish PrRP. However, recent work has revealed that PrRP and C-RFa in non-mammalian vertebrates are encoded by separate genes originated through duplication of an ancestral gene. Indeed, both PrRP and C-RFa are suggested to exist in teleost, amphibian, reptile, and avian species. Therefore, we propose that non-mammalian PrRP (C-RFa) be renamed PrRP2. Despite a common evolutionary origin, PrRP2 appears to be a physiological regulator of PRL, whereas this is not a consistent role for PrRP itself. Further work revealed that the biological functions of PrRP and PrRP2 are not limited solely to PRL release, because they are also neuromodulators of several hypothalamus-pituitary axes and are involved in some brain circuits related to the regulation of food intake, stress, and cardiovascular functions. However, these actions appear to be different among vertebrates. For example, central injection of PrRP inhibits feeding behavior in rodents and teleosts, while it stimulates it in chicks. Therefore, both PrRP and PrRP2 have acquired diverse actions through evolution. In this review, we integrate the burgeoning information of structures, expression profiles, and multiple biological actions of PrRP in higher vertebrates, as well as those of PrRP2 in non-mammals.

Effect of oxytocin, prolactin-releasing peptide, or corticotropin-releasing hormone on feeding behavior in steers

As a preliminary step to elucidate the involvement of central neurotransmitters in the dip in voluntary feed intake during the perinatal period in cows, we investigated the effect of intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of oxytocin, prolactin-releasing peptide (PrRP), or corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), the central functions of all of which undergo drastic changes during the perinatal period, on feed intake in steers. Thirty minutes before the onset of feeding, the treatment solution was injected into the third ventricle through an implanted cannula, and feeding-related behaviors were observed for 1 h after the onset of feeding. Neither ICV oxytocin (5 and 50 μg) nor PrRP (2 and 20 nmol) reduced feed intake (n=6). Twenty nanomoles of bovine CRH noticeably inhibited feeding behavior compared with vehicle treatment (n=5, p<0.05). Fifty micrograms of oxytocin reduced latency to the first water access after feeding onset (p<0.1), which may be because of the stimulation of arginine vasopressin V1b receptor by the high dose of oxytocin. We conclude that CRH inhibits feeding behavior by its central action in this species, although this could also be an indirect effect due to the increased expression of abnormal behaviors caused by CRH. Central administration of neither oxytocin nor PrRP reduced feed intake in steers. Although the effects of sex steroids need to be examined, it appears that increased activity of oxytocin, and possibly PrRP, during the perinatal period does not contribute to the dip in voluntary feed intake in this species. On the other hand, it makes sense that suppressed central CRH activity during the perinatal period should act in the direction of maintaining or even increasing food intake to aid a steady supply of energy to the fetus or offspring. We thus speculate that CRH is not a prime candidate involved in the dip in voluntary feed intake during the perinatal period in cows.