The Efficacy of Tadalafil in Clinical Populations

Established and emerging treatments for diabetes-associated lower urinary tract dysfunction

Dysfunction of the lower urinary tract (LUT) including urinary bladder and urethra (and prostate in men) is one of the most frequent complications of diabetes and can manifest as overactive bladder, underactive bladder, urinary incontinence, and as aggravated symptoms of benign prostate hyperplasia. We have performed a selective literature search to review existing evidence on efficacy of classic medications for the treatment of LUT dysfunction in diabetic patients and animals, i.e., α1-adrenoceptor and muscarinic receptor antagonists, β3-adrenoceptor agonists, and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. Generally, these agents appear to have comparable efficacy in patients and/or animals with and without diabetes. We also review effects of antidiabetic medications on LUT function. Such studies have largely been performed in animal models. In the streptozotocin-induced models of type 1 diabetes, insulin can prevent and reverse alterations of morphology, function, and gene expression patterns in bladder and prostate. Typical medications for the treatment of type 2 diabetes have been studied less often, and the reported findings are not yet sufficient to derive robust conclusions. Thereafter, we review animal studies with emerging medications perhaps targeting diabetes-associated LUT dysfunction. Data with myoinositol, daidzein, and with compounds that target oxidative stress, inflammation, Rac1, nerve growth factor, angiotensin II receptor, serotonin receptor, adenosine receptor, and soluble guanylyl cyclase are not conclusive yet, but some hold promise as potential treatments. Finally, we review nonpharmacological interventions in diabetic bladder dysfunction. These approaches are relatively new and give promising results in preclinical studies. In conclusion, the insulin data in rodent models of type 1 diabetes suggest that diabetes-associated LUT function can be mostly or partially reversed. However, we propose that considerable additional experimental and clinical studies are needed to target diabetes itself or pathophysiological changes induced by chronic hyperglycemia for the treatment of diabetic uropathy.

Effect of tadalafil combined with atorvastatin on hemodynamics and sexual function in middle-aged and elderly patients with hyperlipidemia complicated with erectile dysfunction

Objective:

To evaluate the effect and clinical significance of tadalafil combined with atorvastatin on hemodynamics and sexual function in middle-aged and elderly patients with hyperlipidemia complicated with Erectile dysfunction (ED).

Methods:

Eighty patients with hyperlipidemia complicated with ED who were treated at The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2019 to June 2020 were selected. Using a completely randomized design experimental method, these 80 patients were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group and the control group, with 40 cases in each group. The control group was treated with a single drug, atorvastatin calcium, while the experimental group was given tadalafil orally on the basis of the control group for 3 months. Changes in the levels of inflammatory factors such as IL-6, TNF and CRP, adverse drug reactions, changes in hemodynamic indicators such as HSV, LSV, PSV, HCT and ESR before and after treatment, as well as changes in sexual function after treatment were compared and analyzed between the two groups.

Results:

TNF-a, CRP and IL-6 in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group after treatment, with statistically significant differences (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse drug reactions between the two groups (p=0.18). After treatment, hemodynamic indexes and sexual function indexes of the experimental group were significantly improved compared with those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (p<0.05).

Conclusion:

A significant improvement effect can be achieved by tadalafil combined with atorvastatin on hemodynamics and sexual function in middle-aged and elderly patients with hyperlipidemia complicated with ED. At the same time, the combination of the two has synergism on inflammatory factors and blood rheology, and the incidence of adverse reactions is not significantly increased.

Efficacy of Continuous Dosing of Tadalafil Once Daily vs Tadalafil On Demand in Clinical Subgroups of Men With Erectile Dysfunction: A Descriptive Comparison Using the Integrated Tadalafil Databases

Introduction

Various factors play a role in the development of erectile dysfunction (ED).

Aim

To provide a descriptive comparison of erectile function response for tadalafil on-demand (PRN) and once-daily (OAD) dosing regimens in patients with common comorbid conditions, treatments, or risk factors that can be considered when treating ED.

Methods

In total, 17 PRN and 4 OAD placebo-controlled studies were included in the integrated database in these pooled analyses. Data were analyzed from patients treated with placebo, tadalafil 10 mg (low dose), and 20 mg (high dose) for the PRN studies and placebo, tadalafil 2.5 mg (low dose), and 5 mg (high dose) for the OAD studies.

Main Outcome Measures

The effects of tadalafil were measured using the International Index of Erectile Function administered from baseline to week 12. A descriptive comparison of the efficacy of tadalafil PRN vs OAD was examined in the clinical populations.

Results

Baseline characteristics of 4,354 men were comparable between the PRN and OAD groups, with differences seen only in the variables of race, body mass index (BMI) of at least 30 kg/m², and alcohol use. Tadalafil was efficacious at improving erectile function for all clinical populations, except for the low-dose OAD group, which demonstrated a weaker effect vs placebo than the high-dose OAD group, and the low- and high-dose PRN groups vs placebo for patients with BMI of at least 30 kg/m² for patients without a cardiovascular disorder, smokers, patients with ED duration shorter than 1 year, and patients without previous phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor use. Tadalafil was efficacious for patients with or without diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and alcohol use at baseline.

Conclusion

Tadalafil OAD and PRN regimens showed efficacy in patients with ED. No clinical populations of patients with ED seemed to benefit overwhelmingly from one dose regimen over the other.

Ureterorenoscopy with stenting and its effect on male sexual function: A controlled randomised prospective study

Seventy-two male patients, who were included in this study, underwent ureteroscopic stone surgery (study group). Forty-two healthy males were enrolled as control group. Changes in sexual function were evaluated using International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire in pre-operative, first and third postoperative terms. Overall satisfaction in relation to the age, operation time, presence of stents, body mass index, educational status, previous operations, International Index of Erectile Function score, International Prostate Symptom Score, Quality of Life, income status, Male Sexual Health Questionnaire, stone-free rates and Beck's depression scale were evaluated. Erectile and ejaculatory functions, quality of life and lower urinary tract symptoms were negatively affected due to ureteroscopic stone surgery, while educational status, psychogenic aspect and income status remained stable. In conclusion, ureteroscopic stone surgery with JJ catheterisation seems to have a progressively decreasing negative effect on male sexual function and whenever possible, stenting should be avoided. If JJ stenting is necessary, patients should be informed that they may experience sexual dysfunction at least for 3 months and if stenting proves necessary the indwelling should be kept as short as possible.

Impact of cardiovascular risk factors and related comorbid conditions and medical therapy reported at baseline on the treatment response to tadalafil 5 mg once-daily in men with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: an integrated analysis of four randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trials

PURPOSE

The influence of cardiovascular risk factors/comorbidities on response to oral once-daily tadalafil 5 mg was explored in men with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH).

METHODS

This post hoc analysis pooled data from four double-blind studies in which 1498 men with > 6-mo history of LUTS/BPH were randomised and received either once-daily placebo (n = 746) or tadalafil 5 mg (n = 752) for 12 weeks. Descriptive statistics were reported for changes in total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS voiding and storage subscores, and IPSS quality-of-life (QoL) index. Treatment group differences by baseline clinical and cardiovascular factors and medical therapies were examined using analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

Tadalafil was effective in men with LUTS/BPH and cardiovascular risk factors/comorbidities except for patients receiving > 1 antihypertensive medication. Placebo-adjusted least squares (LS) mean improvements in total IPSS were -1.2 (95% CI: -2.5 to -0.0) in men taking > 1 antihypertensive medication vs. -3.3 (95% CI: -4.4 to -2.1) in men taking one medication (interaction p = 0.020). In addition, placebo-adjusted LS mean improvements in total IPSS were -0.2 (95% CI, -2.1 to 1.7) in men who reported use of diuretics vs. -2.8 (95% CI, -3.7 to -1.9) in men who reported taking other antihypertensive medications vs. -2.3 (95% CI, -3.2 to -1.5) in men who reported not using any antihypertensive drug (p-value for interaction = 0.053).

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily tadalafil 5 mg improved LUTS/BPH, regardless of severity, in men with coexisting cardiovascular risk factors/comorbidities, except for patients with history of > 1 drug for arterial hypertension. Use of diuretics may contribute to patients' perception of a negated efficacy of tadalafil on LUTS/BPH. Comorbidities should be considered when choosing the optimal medicine to treat men with LUTS/BPH.

Tadalafil 5 mg once daily for the treatment of erectile dysfunction during a 6-month observational study (EDATE): impact of patient characteristics and comorbidities

BACKGROUND

To explore the impact of patient-characteristics and relevant comorbidities on treatment continuation rates, effectiveness, and satisfaction in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) who started or switched to tadalafil 5 mg once daily (TAD-OaD) at baseline.

METHODS

In the EDATE observational study, phosphodiesterase-type-5 (PDE5)-inhibitor pretreated or naïve ED patients who started or switched to TAD-OaD were prospectively followed for 6 months. Time to discontinuation of TAD-OaD was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method at Months 2, 4, and 6 in subgroups stratified by age (18 - 65 years and >65 years), PDE5-inhibitor pretreatment, ED-severity (mild, moderate, severe), and presence or absence of relevant comorbidities (BPH, diabetes, CVD, hypertension, dyslipidemia). LSmean change from baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) scores and associated 95 % CIs were assessed using a mixed-model for repeated measures. Visit, ED etiology, and subgroups were included as fixed-effects.

RESULTS

Overall, 778 patients received prescriptions for initiating or switching to TAD-OaD at baseline. At Month 2, >90 % of patients remained on TAD-OaD, except those aged >65 years (86.7 %) and patients with severe ED (89.0 %). More than 80 % of patients in all subgroups, except those aged >65 years (75.0 %), continued TAD-OaD at Month 6. There was a significant LSmean negative effect on IIEF- EF domain-score improvement for BPH (LSmean effect [95 % CI]: -2.77 [-4.98, -0.55], p = 0.014), previous PDE5-inhibitor treatment (-2.13 [-3.33,-0.94], p < 0.001), and mild vs moderate ED (-2.00 [-3.54,-0.46], p = 0.011); the latter possibly linked with a bigger treatment-effect in those with more severe ED at baseline. The LSmean effect on change in IIEF-EF was significantly positive for diabetes (2.28 [0.64,3.92], p = 0.007), most likely because those with diabetes had more severe ED at baseline. For all other parameters, no statistically significant LSmean effects in IIEF-EF changes were observed. No comorbidity or baseline-characteristic except age (18 - 65 years vs >65 years: 11.25 [2.96,19.54], p = 0.008) affected changes in EDITS.

CONCLUSIONS

Under routine clinical conditions, treatment continuation rate or satisfaction does not seem to be significantly affected by the presence of comorbidities in men who choose ED-treatment with TAD-OaD. The magnitude of treatment effectiveness was affected by certain baseline characteristics and comorbid conditions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study (H6D-EW-LVIU) is registered in the German VfA Registry of Non-Interventional Studies (Verband Forschender Arzneimittelhersteller) since 06 December 2011; available at: http://www.vfa.de/de/arzneimittel-forschung/datenbanken-zu-arzneimitteln/nisdb/nis-details/_741 .

Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Vascular Disease and Erectile Dysfunction: Theory and Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (LI-ESWT) to the penis has recently emerged as a new and promising modality in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED).

AIM

To review the published literature on the mechanism of action of LI-ESWT; and to report our clinical data on its efficacy in men with vasculogenic ED.

METHODS

A Medline search using the relevant keywords on this topic has been done.

RESULTS

From the results of numerous preclinical and animal studies that have been done to date, sufficient evidence shows that the underlying mechanism of action of LI-ESWT is probably neovascularization. Therefore, local application of LI-ESWT to the corpora cavernosa may potentially act in the same mechanism and increase corporal blood flow. We found that the application of LI-ESWT to patients who responded to oral therapy (PDE5i) eliminated their dependence on PDE5i and they were able to successfully achieve erections and vaginal penetration (60-75%). Furthermore, PDE5i non-responders became responders and capable of vaginal penetration (72%). Additionally, LI-ESWT resulted in long-term improvement of the erectile mechanism.

CONCLUSIONS

LI-ESWT has the potential to improve and permanently restore erectile function by reinstating the penile blood flow. Although these results on LI-ESWT are promising, further multi- centered studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings. Gruenwald I, Kitrey ND, Appel B, and Vardi Y. Stem low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy in vascular disease and erectile dysfunction: Theory and outcomes. Sex Med Rev 2013;1:83-90.

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for treating erectile dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: A comprehensive review

Many men have coexistent erectile dysfunction (ED) and lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH). Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors are effective for treating both of these conditions independently. In this review we summarise the evidence supporting a link between ED and LUTS/BPH, and the results from key clinical studies related to the use of PDE5 inhibitors for treating both conditions. The results from these studies suggest that men who have both ED and LUTS/BPH, and are concerned about their sexual dysfunction, might benefit from single-agent, holistic treatment with a PDE5 inhibitor.

Adherence to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in long-term users: how do men use the inhibitors?

Introduction

The high effectiveness of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-i) in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) has been demonstrated. However, previous research shows that PDE5-i treatments have high discontinuation rates.

Aim

The main goals of this study were to (i) characterize the way men use PDE5-i and (ii) analyze the adherence to treatment, identifying the factors that influence PDE5-i use.

Methods

A total of 148 men with clinical diagnosis for ED who maintained the treatment with PDE5-i for over 3 years were interviewed. Interviews concerning their ongoing treatment were carried out using a standardized questionnaire with quantitative and qualitative items.

Main Outcome Measures

Physiological measures included the intracavernous alprostadil injection test, associated with penile rigidometry and penile Doppler ultrasound. The qualitative measure included two questions: “Do you use the drug in every sexual intercourse?” and “How do you use the inhibitor?”

Results

ED causes were classified as venogenic (31%), arteriogenic (23%), psychogenic (18%), iatrogenic (13%), neurogenic (8%), and diabetic (7%). Participation rate was 71.8%. Of the 148 patients studied, 75% claimed not to use PDE5-i in every intercourse. Most used tadalafil (66%), followed by sildenafil (20%), vardenafil (10%), and 4% alternated the type of medicine. Four main categories emerged concerning the factors that determine the intake of PDE5-i in some intercourse situations and not in others: (i) psychological factors; (ii) medication-related factors; (iii) circumstantial factors; and (iv) relational factors.

Conclusion

The analysis of men's narratives revealed a combination of factors that influence the adherence to PDE5-i. The psychological and medication-related factors were the most prevalent. This study highlighted the importance of taking these factors into account, both at the time of prescription and during the follow-up in order to improve adherence. Carvalheira A, Forjaz V, and Pereira NM. Adherence to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in long-term users: How do men use the inhibitors? Sex Med 2014;2:96–102.

Udenafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is often perceived by both patients and sexual partners as a serious problem that can jeopardize quality of life, psychosocial or emotional well-being, and the partnership in the long term. Since their introduction, oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) have been found to be highly effective and well tolerated, and are available as the first-line therapy for the treatment of ED. Udenafil is one of the selective PDE5Is made available in recent years for the treatment of ED. Udenafil has clinical properties of both relatively rapid onset and long duration of action due to its pharmacokinetic profile, thereby providing an additional treatment option for ED men to better suit individual needs. There is positive evidence that udenafil is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of ED of a broad spectrum of etiologies or severity. Udenafil is as effective in the treatment of diabetes mellitus-associated ED as other PDE5Is. Due to the clinical property of relatively long duration of action, udenafil may be another option in daily dosing treatment for ED, as suggested by its favorable efficacy and safety profile. Most adverse effects reported from clinical trials are mild or moderate in severity, without any serious adverse event, with headache and flushing being the most common. Also, the concomitant use of anti-hypertensive drugs or alpha-1-blockers does not significantly affect the efficacy and safety profile of udenafil. However, additional studies with larger cohorts including prospective, multicenter, comparative studies with patients of different ethnicities are needed to further validate the favorable findings of udenafil in the treatment of ED.

Nonresponders, partial responders, and complete responders to PDE5 inhibitors therapy according to IIEF criteria: validation of an anchor-based treatment responder classification

INTRODUCTION

Despite widespread use of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) in erectile dysfunction (ED) research, there are no published criteria for classifying ED treatment responders in clinical trials or patient management settings. A new classification for treatment response in men with ED has been developed and validated in a large clinical trial database.

AIM

The study aims to test discriminant and convergent validity of the responder classification and examine the role of covariates.

METHOD

Treatment assignment was used to test discriminant validity. The diary-based Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) question ("Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?") and Global Assessment Question (GAQ) ("Has the treatment you have been taking over the past study interval improved your erections?") were used to evaluate convergent validity. Chi-square and Cochran-Armitage trend tests were used to examine outcome associations. Logistic regression was used to further assess the relationship of outcomes controlling for covariates.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The classification measure was developed and validated in a database from 17 clinical trials in 3,252 men with ED randomized to placebo or tadalafil. The treatment responder is defined as complete (erectile function [EF] ≥ 26); partial (EF < 26; met minimal clinically important difference [MCID] criteria); or nonresponder following treatment (EF < 26; did not meet MCID).

RESULTS

The new responder definition performed consistently well in all prespecified tests of validity. Eighty-nine percent of subjects classified as complete responders were in the treatment group, and the responder definition was associated with changes on the SEP and GAQ measures, respectively (SEP odds ratio [OR] = 14, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 11-17; GAQ OR = 50, 95% CI 39-88; complete vs. nonresponders).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and validated a novel method of defining an ED treatment responder based on multiple IIEF criteria and using other measures (SEP, GAQ) for validation. The results have implications for understanding results of clinical trials in ED, and in monitoring response to treatment in the clinic.

The role of initial success rates and other factors in determining reliability of outcomes of phosphodiesterase inhibitor therapy for erectile dysfunction: a pooled analysis of 17 placebo-controlled trials of tadalafil for use as needed

INTRODUCTION

Reliability of successful outcomes in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) on phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors is an important aspect of patient management.

AIMS

We examined reliability of successful outcomes in a large integrated dataset of randomized tadalafil trials.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Success rates, time to success, subsequent success after first success, and probability of success were analyzed based on Sexual Encounter Profile questions 2 and 3.

METHODS

Data from 3,254 ED patients treated with tadalafil 10 mg (N = 510), 20 mg (N = 1,772), or placebo (N = 972) were pooled from 17 placebo-controlled studies.

RESULTS

Tadalafil patients had significantly higher first-attempt success rates vs. placebo. This effect was consistent across most subgroups; however, patients with severe ED experienced a greater response to tadalafil than patients with mild-moderate ED. Approximately 80% of patients achieved successful penile insertion within two attempts with either tadalafil dose and successful intercourse within eight attempts for tadalafil 10 mg and four attempts for tadalafil 20 mg. However, approximately 70% of tadalafil-treated patients achieved successful intercourse even by the second attempt. Subsequent success rates were higher for patients with first-attempt success (81.5% for 10 mg and 86.1% for 20 mg vs. 66.2% for placebo, P < 0.001) vs. patients with later initial success (53.2% for 10 mg and 56.4% for 20 mg vs. 39.9% for placebo, P < 0.001). Among patients treated with tadalafil, intercourse success rates at early attempts were similar to rates at later attempts (i.e., attempts 5 and 10 vs. 25), although insertion success rates were significantly lower earlier in treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings affirm the reliability of successful outcomes with tadalafil treatment and that first-attempt success is a critical factor affecting subsequent outcomes. The results further show that even among men who did not succeed on first attempt, a substantial proportion will have successful outcomes if treatment is maintained.

Minimal clinically important differences in the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function scale

BACKGROUND

Despite widespread adoption of the six-item erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) as a clinical trial end point, there are currently no objective data on what constitutes a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the EF domain.

OBJECTIVE

Estimate the MCID for the IIEF EF domain.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Anchor-based MCIDs were estimated using data from 17 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trials of the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5-I) tadalafil for 3345 patients treated for 12 wk.

MEASUREMENTS

The anchor for the MCID is the minimal improvement measure calculated using change from baseline to 12 wk on IIEF question 7: "Over the past 4 weeks, when you attempted sexual intercourse how often was it satisfactory for you?" MCIDs were developed using analysis of variance (ANOVA)- and receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-based methods in a subset of studies (n=11) by comparing patients with and without minimal improvement (n=863). MCIDs were validated in the remaining six studies (n=377).

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The ROC-based MCID for the EF domain was 4, with estimated sensitivity and specificity of 0.74 and 0.73, respectively. MCIDs varied significantly (p<0.0001) according to baseline ED severity (mild: 2; moderate: 5; severe: 7). MCIDs consistently distinguished between patients in the validation sample classified as no change or minimally improved overall and by geographic region, ED etiology, and age group. MCIDs did not differ by age group, geographic region, or ED etiology. Current analyses were based on 17 clinical trials of tadalafil. Results need to be replicated in studies using other PDE5-Is or in nonpharmacologic intervention studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The contextualization of treatment-related changes in terms of clinically relevant improvement is essential to understanding treatment efficacy, to interpreting results across studies, and to managing patients effectively. This analysis provides, for the first time, anchor-based estimates of MCIDs in the EF domain score of the IIEF.

Standards for clinical trials in male sexual dysfunctions

INTRODUCTION

Clinical trials in male sexual dysfunction (MSD) are expanding. Consequently, there is a need for consensus standards in this area.

AIM

To develop an evidence-based, state-of-the-art consensus report on standards for clinical trials in MSD.

METHODS

A literature review was performed examining clinical trials in erectile dysfunction (ED), premature ejaculation (PE), delayed/absent ejaculation, libido disorders/loss of desire, hypogonadism, and Peyronie's disease, focusing on publications published in the last 20 years. This manuscript represents the opinions of eight experts from seven countries developed in a consensus process. This document was presented for peer review and debate in a public forum and revisions were made based on recommendations of chairpersons to the International Consultation on Sexual Medicine.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Expert opinion was based on the grading of evidence-based medical literature, widespread internal committee discussion, public presentation, and debate.

RESULTS

According to experience and recent publications in dealing with clinical trials in sexual dysfunction, recommendations have been made for conducting trials in patients with ED, PE, delayed ejaculation, libido disorders, hypogonadism, and Peyronie's disease.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important that future clinical trials are conducted using standards upon which investigators can rely when reading manuscripts or conducting new trials in this field.

Five-year experience with tadalafil in the UK: an effective treatment for erectile dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common medical condition. In the UK, approximately 2.3 million men suffer from moderate-to-severe ED, many of whom do not consult a healthcare professional about the problem. Phosphodiesterase-type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors have revolutionised treatment for ED and three such drugs are currently available: sildenafil citrate, tadalafil and vardenafil HCl.

METHODS

This article reviews available information on the efficacy and safety of tadalafil for the treatment of ED, with a focus on clinical experience in the UK.

RESULTS

The clinical effects of tadalafil have been shown to last for up to 36 h after administration, longer than the other PDE5 inhibitors, which are effective for only 4-5 h after dosing. Extensive clinical experience with tadalafil, worldwide and in the UK, supports its efficacy and tolerability in many patient populations, including those with comorbidities often associated with ED.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies have shown that tadalafil is an effective ED treatment, regardless of disease severity and cause, patient age and presence of comorbid conditions. As the treatments for ED have evolved, patient preference has emerged as an important aspect of ED therapy.

Combination of vacuum erection device and PDE5 inhibitors as salvage therapy in PDE5 inhibitor nonresponders with erectile dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

Oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) have improved treatment options for erectile dysfunction (ED). In case of unresponsiveness to PDE5i, alternative therapies are considered.

AIM

To evaluate whether combination of vacuum erection device (VED) and PDE5i is effective as salvage therapy in subjects with ED in whom PDE5i alone failed.

METHODS

From September 2007 to May 2008, we evaluated 69 men (aged 36-82 years) in whom PDE5i treatment at the highest recommended dose, with at least 4-6 attempts at intercourse during a 3 months period, had failed. The clinical efficacy of combination therapy was evaluated using the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) questionnaire, Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP)-2, SEP-3, and Global Patient Assessment Scale (GPAS).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Scores on IIEF-5, SEP-2, SEP-3, and GPAS before and after combination therapy were measured.

RESULTS

After 4 weeks of combination therapy, the mean IIEF-5 score increased significantly over baseline from 9.0 to 17.6 (P < 0.001). Of the 34 subjects with a SEP-2 response of "no" at baseline, 27 (79%) responded "yes" after combination therapy (P < 0.001). Of the 50 subjects with a SEP-3 response of "no" at baseline, 35 (70%) responded "yes" after combination therapy (P < 0.001). Furthermore, of the 42 subjects with a GPAS response of "not at all" or "slightly" improved at baseline, 31 (74%) responded "moderately" or "greatly" improved after combination therapy (P < 0.001). One subject (1.5%) experienced device-related intermittent penile pain, which resolved after 4 days without any action.

CONCLUSIONS

Statistically significant improvements over baseline were seen in IIEF-5, SEP-2, SEP-3, and GPAS measures following 4 weeks of combination therapy of PDE5i and VED. This study supports the use of PDE5i with VED in men in whom PDE5i alone failed. This combination therapy may be offered to patients not satisfied with PDE5i alone before being switched to more invasive alternatives.

Efficacy and safety of tadalafil taken as needed for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in Asian men: results of an integrated analysis

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of as-needed tadalafil in a diverse clinical population (with varying patient demographics, disease severity, and comorbid medical conditions) of Asian men with erectile dysfunction (ED). An integrated analysis of five double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (N = 1 046) was performed. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg tadalafil (N = 185), 20 mg tadalafil (N = 510), or placebo (N = 351). Efficacy assessments included the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary and Global Assessment Question (GAQ). Patients receiving 10 mg or 20 mg tadalafil showed significant improvement from baseline-to-end point on the Erectile Function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) domain score in all clinical sub-populations analyzed, compared with patients receiving placebo (P < 0.001). The 10-mg and 20-mg tadalafil groups showed a mean success rate of 64.1% and 70.5% for sexual intercourse attempts (SEP3, successful intercourse), respectively, compared with 33.4% in the placebo group (P < 0.001), and 85.5% and 85.4% reported improved erections at end point GAQ, respectively, versus 43.5% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Tadalafil was well tolerated across all groups studied. Headache and back pain were the most frequently reported adverse events. Overall, tadalafil was effective and well tolerated across a diverse clinical spectrum of Asian men with ED.

Erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular disease: efficacy and safety of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in men with both conditions

Risk factors for cardiovascular disease and erectile dysfunction (ED) are similar, as might be expected given their shared etiologic and pathophysiologic origins. It is now generally accepted that most cases of ED result from a vascular disturbance of the endothelium. Recent epidemiological studies have documented a strong association between ED and comorbid conditions such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia. Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors are recommended as first-line therapy for erection problems of all etiologies and severities. The efficacy and safety of PDE5 inhibitors in the general ED population is well documented and has been extensively reviewed. To examine the association between ED and vascular disorders in the context of current knowledge regarding PDE5 inhibitors, an electronic search was performed of articles published from January 2002 through April 2008 using the PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases. Although preference was given to randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trials, data from retrospective studies were also reviewed when appropriate. This analysis revealed that the clinical evidence linking ED to future cardiovascular events is compelling, presenting physicians with a unique interventional opportunity to address underlying cardiovascular health concerns in men presenting with ED. In most studies, PDE5 inhibitors were shown to effectively and safely improve erectile function regardless of cause, severity, or presence of comorbid conditions, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia.

Erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular disease: efficacy and safety of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in men with both conditions

Risk factors for cardiovascular disease and erectile dysfunction (ED) are similar, as might be expected given their shared etiologic and pathophysiologic origins. It is now generally accepted that most cases of ED result from a vascular disturbance of the endothelium. Recent epidemiological studies have documented a strong association between ED and comorbid conditions such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia. Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors are recommended as first-line therapy for erection problems of all etiologies and severities. The efficacy and safety of PDE5 inhibitors in the general ED population is well documented and has been extensively reviewed. To examine the association between ED and vascular disorders in the context of current knowledge regarding PDE5 inhibitors, an electronic search was performed of articles published from January 2002 through April 2008 using the PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases. Although preference was given to randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trials, data from retrospective studies were also reviewed when appropriate. This analysis revealed that the clinical evidence linking ED to future cardiovascular events is compelling, presenting physicians with a unique interventional opportunity to address underlying cardiovascular health concerns in men presenting with ED. In most studies, PDE5 inhibitors were shown to effectively and safely improve erectile function regardless of cause, severity, or presence of comorbid conditions, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia.

Efficacy of tadalafil once daily in men with diabetes mellitus and erectile dysfunction

AIMS

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common comorbidity in men with diabetes mellitus. Tadalafil 10 or 20 mg taken on demand is efficacious and safe for men with diabetes and ED. Recently, continuous treatment with tadalafil has been proposed, addressing ED management as any other chronic condition. This study examined whether once-daily tadalafil 2.5 and 5 mg is efficacious for men with diabetes and ED.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, 12-week study enrolled 298 men with diabetes and ED to once-daily treatment with placebo, tadalafil 2.5 mg or tadalafil 5 mg. Primary efficacy measures were International Index of Erectile Function Erectile Function (IIEF EF) Domain score, and patient success rates for vaginal penetration and completion of intercourse. Patient satisfaction, endothelial function biomarkers, and safety were also assessed.

RESULTS

Patients receiving either dose of tadalafil had clinically and statistically significant improvements in IIEF EF and statistically significant improvements in mean success rates for vaginal penetration, completion of intercourse, and overall treatment satisfaction (P < or = 0.005 tadalafil vs. placebo, all measures). Endothelial dysfunction biomarkers were unchanged. The most common adverse events were headache, back pain and dyspepsia.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first study of men with diabetes and ED, once-daily tadalafil 2.5 and 5 mg was efficacious and well tolerated, suggesting this may be an alternative to on-demand treatment for some men, eliminating the need to plan sex within a limited timeframe.

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor therapy: identifying and exploring what attributes matter more to clinicians and patients in the management of erectile dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is increasingly being recognized as a sentinel marker of future subsequent cardiovascular disease (CVD). Predicted increases in the prevalence of ED are due to a combination of an aging population and the increasing presence of comorbid conditions (hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes). The dichotomy of the situation is that ED is often associated with these comorbidities, potentially leading to greater CVD risk, and conversely, these comorbidities have also been shown to increase the risk of developing ED. The successful treatment of ED with phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor therapy, therefore, is of paramount importance because it not only plays a critical role in restoring erectile function, but also provides clinicians with the opportunity to mitigate existing cardiovascular comorbidities or prevent the occurrence of CVD in this patient population.

METHODS

This review is based on an electronic literature search of databases, including MEDLINE/PubMed, with information selected for its relevance to PDE5 inhibitor therapy comprising efficacy (e.g., first-dose success) in men with ED with or without comorbidities, onset and duration of action at specific time points, and patient preference.

RESULTS

The introduction of PDE5 inhibitors represented a major advance in the treatment of ED. In spite of the availability of these agents, a large percentage of men are still not being treated, in many cases because of their reluctance to seek medical help. Moreover, many men who start treatment with PDE5 inhibitors discontinue treatment. Reasons for discontinuation are many and complex, including lack of initial or first-time success. Although of major concern to both patients and clinicians, there remains limited published clinical data on this specific parameter in the pertinent patient population and from prospective, randomized clinical studies.

CONCLUSION

Data from studies suggests that the available PDE5 inhibitor therapies are effective in treating men with ED, including those who have increased CVD risk and those who have clinically identified cardiovascular comorbidities such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and/or diabetes. According to data from studies, the attributes of PDE5 inhibitor therapy that matter more to clinicians and patients and that hold influence over treatment compliance include effectiveness in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities, first dose effectiveness or early success, rapid onset of action, reliability, and tolerability.

Prevalence and correlates of erectile dysfunction (ED) and treatment seeking for ED in Asian Men: the Asian Men's Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (MALES) study

INTRODUCTION

There have been limited multiregional studies in Asia examining the parameters of men's general and sexual health and quality of life in the general population vs. those in clinical cohorts of patients with erectile dysfunction (ED).

AIMS

The aims of the Asian Men's Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (Asian MALES) study were to investigate the prevalence of ED, associated health conditions, and ED treatment-seeking patterns in the general male population in five regions of Asia (China, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, and Taiwan).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Standardized questionnaire previously used in a similar multiregional study and modified to ensure culturally appropriate content for Asia.

METHODS

Phase I of the study involved 10,934 adult men, aged 20-75 years, who were interviewed using the standardized questionnaire. Phase II of the study involved men with self-reported ED recruited from Phase I and via physician referral, invitations in general practitioner offices, and street interception (total Phase II sample, N = 1,209).

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of self-reported ED in the Phase I study population was 6.4%. ED prevalence varied by region and significantly increased with age (P < 0.01). Men with ED reported significantly greater rates of comorbid illness (P < 0.0001) and a reduced quality of life (P = 0.0001), compared with men without ED. Phase II of the study revealed that fewer than half of men with self-reported ED had sought treatment for their problem. Men were more likely to seek help for erection difficulties from Western doctors than from traditional medicine practitioners (P = 0.0001). A man's partner/spouse was the most common influencer of treatment seeking in all regions except Malaysia.

CONCLUSION

The findings confirm those of existing research on ED in both Asian and non-Asian males: ED is a prevalent condition; the prevalence of ED increases with age and is strongly associated with comorbid conditions; and the majority of men have never sought treatment for their condition. This study highlights a substantial need for the evaluation and treatment of ED in Asian men.

Current safety and tolerability issues in men with erectile dysfunction receiving PDE5 inhibitors

AIMS

Treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) has been greatly advanced by the advent of phosphodiesterase type-5 (PDE5) inhibitors. Upon the introduction of these agents, their cardiovascular (CV) safety was a major concern, mainly due to their vasodilatory effects. We conducted an electronic literature review of data concerning the safety and tolerability issues of men with ED receiving PDE5 inhibitors.

RESULTS

Although safety concerns have been raised, evaluation of CV safety and related adverse events in clinical trials has not revealed any atypical safety issues.

DISCUSSION

No causal association has been established to date between non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION) and PDE5 inhibitors. In addition, there are established guidelines which provide recommendations for the safe and effective use of these agents in treating men with ED and associated comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical trial and postmarketing surveillance data confirm the safety and tolerability profile of the PDE5 inhibitors, even in patients with endothelial dysfunction-associated comorbidities.

Diagnosis and management of erectile dysfunction in the primary care setting

Recent advances in the management of erectile dysfunction (ED) involve the use of oral phosphodiesterase type-5 (PDE-5) inhibitor therapies which have transformed the perception of ED for both the patient and the healthcare provider. Recent treatment guidelines, including the American Urological Association (AUA) 2005 guidelines, promote a goal-oriented approach to therapy and emphasise that PDE-5 therapy should be offered to patients with ED as a first-line treatment option, unless contraindicated. Evidence-based studies have identified an association between ED and the presence of risk factors for cardiovascular and other vascular diseases, implicating ED as a marker for other vascular conditions. Therefore, the importance of screening and diagnosis in the primary care setting is paramount in the diagnosis and management of ED-associated comorbidities. This review provides an update on ED screening and management focusing on the use of PDE-5 inhibitor therapy in the primary care setting and also discusses clinical efficacy parameters with regard to recent results from clinical trials.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH—ED PHARMACOTHERAPY: A Comparison of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg in Japanese Patients with Severe Erectile Dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor with documented efficacy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED).

AIM

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg in men with severe ED.

METHODS

A prespecified subgroup analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of tadalafil 10 and 20 mg measured by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) erectile function (EF) domain and Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) among patients with severe ED (EF domain score = 1-10) in a Japanese placebo-controlled study (PCT). We also analyzed the efficacy of the two doses in men with severe ED post hoc by pooling data from three tadalafil clinical trials that evaluated these doses using a similar study design (three placebo-controlled trials), and evaluated (post hoc) the presence of organic comorbidities in patients with different levels of response to tadalafil 10 or 20 mg.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean change in the IIEF-EF domain and mean per-patient changes in percent "yes" responses to SEP Question 2 (SEP2) and Question 3 (SEP3).

RESULTS

Patients with severe ED in the Japanese study experienced numerically greater increases (improvements) when taking tadalafil 20 mg compared with 10 mg in the IIEF-EF domain (14.3 vs. 12.4; P = 0.355), SEP2 (60% vs. 57%; P = 0.781), and SEP3 (61% vs. 49%, P = 0.196). When sufficiently powered, these observations reached statistical significance in the three PCTs: patients with severe ED experienced greater increases when taking tadalafil 20 mg compared with 10 mg in the IIEF-EF domain (13.6 vs. 10.4; P = 0.014) and SEP3 (56% vs. 43%, P = 0.019). Both doses were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with severe ED, and especially those with an organic comorbidity, may derive greater clinical benefits from tadalafil 20 mg compared with 10 mg.

[Sexuality and pharmacotherapy. Medication-induced disorders of sexual response and pharmacotherapeutic options for the treatment of sexual dysfunctions]

This contribution addresses two different areas of the complex relationship between pharmacotherapy and sexual function and dysfunction in men and women. As many impairments of sexual function are caused by side effects of medications, particularly psychotropic drugs, the first part of the paper describes substances and mechanisms often related to sexual dysfunction with a special focus on antidepressants and neuroleptics. While serotonin reuptake inhibitors entail a high risk of sexual dysfunction, it is often difficult to differentiate the negative impact of the drug from the impairment caused by the mental disorder itself. Ways to deal with these dysfunctions and remedial measures are discussed. In the second section, current pharmacological treatments for female and male sexual dysfunctions are reviewed. While there is no approved pharmacotherapy with established efficacy for female sexual dysfunction with the possible exception of the transdermal testosterone patch for surgically menopausal women, effective pharmacological therapies are available for male erectile disorders. In addition, testosterone substitution is the treatment of choice for hypoactive sexual desire disorders caused by hypogonadism. As sexual dysfunctions are often caused by a mixture of psychological and organic factors, treatment strategies combining pharmacological options and sex therapy are advocated.

Tadalafil as an in vitro sperm motility stimulant

Tadalafil (Cialis) is a known oral selective phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor used widely in the management of erectile dysfunction. To assess its ability on human sperm motility in vitro, 70 asthenozoospermic semen specimens delivered by masturbation were investigated. Semen samples were divided equally into four tubes, one as a control and to the others tadalafil dissolved solution was added in vitro in three different concentrations (4.0, 1.0, 0.5 mg ml(-1) respectively). The tubes were incubated and were followed up for sperm motility per cent changes for 0.5, 1, 2, 3 h. It was found that the concentration used played an important role in the degree of sperm enhancement. Specimens treated with 4 mg ml(-1) tadalafil solution demonstrated a significant decrease in sperm motility compared with the controls. Specimens treated with 1.0 mg ml(-1) solution demonstrated significant increase in sperm progressive forward motility. Specimens treated with 0.5 mg ml(-1) solution demonstrated significant increases in sperm motility but lower than that of 1 mg ml(-1) concentration. It is concluded that in vitro use of tadalafil solution in special concentration has a significant stimulatory effect on asthenozoospermic sperm motility.

Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil in Men with Erectile Dysfunction with a High Prevalence of Comorbid Conditions: Results from MOMENTUS: Multiple Observations in Men with Erectile Dysfunction in National Tadalafil Study in the US

INTRODUCTION

Limited efficacy and safety data exist from open-label clinical trials of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and multiple comorbid (MCM) conditions, historically a difficult group to treat.

AIM

A multicenter study (Multiple Observations in Men with Erectile Dysfunction in National Tadalafil Study in the US) assessed efficacy and safety of tadalafil in men with ED and MCM conditions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was change from baseline in the erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function. Secondary end points included the Sexual Encounter Profile, Global Assessment Questions, and Sexual Self-Confidence and Spontaneity Domains of the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales.

METHODS

This was an open-label, multicenter study in men with ED. Tadalafil 20 mg was administered as needed prior to sexual activity, up to once/day, for 12 weeks following a 4-week ED-treatment-free period. The MCM group was 155 of 1,911 men enrolled in this study. Men in the MCM group met eligibility criteria but could not be included in other predefined groups: (i) Caucasian; (ii) Black American; (iii) Hispanic (groups 1-3, < or =65 years, no diabetes or depression); (iv) depression, < or =65 years, no diabetes; (v) diabetes, < or =65 years, no depression; (vi) >65 years, no diabetes or depression; and (vii) ED subsequent to traumatic spinal cord injury.

RESULTS

Mean baseline EF domain score in MCM (mean age 65 +/- 9 years) was 12.2 +/- 6.5; 52% of subjects had severe ED; 72% diabetes mellitus; 67% cardiovascular disease (including hypertension); 49% hyperlipidemia; 38% depression; 84% had two or more comorbidities. At end point, there was a significant (P < 0.001) mean change of 7.6 from baseline in mean EF domain score. Among men with severe ED, 22% achieved an EF domain score > or =26. Most common adverse events were headache 5.2%; flushing 3.9% and nasal congestion 3.2%; 3% discontinued use because of an adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

In this open-label clinical trial of older men with ED and MCMs, tadalafil 20 mg significantly increased all efficacy end points and was well-tolerated.

Do vardenafil and tadalafil have advantages over sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction?

Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects up to 50% of men between the ages of 40 and 70 years of age. Sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil have all been shown to be similarly effective in the treatment of men with ED of vary etiologies, to have similar adverse effects profiles, and to improve quality-of-life by similar amounts. As these phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors all increase the hypotensive effects of nitrates, they are not suitable for use in patients taking nitrates for the treatment of ischaemic heart disease. All three inhibitors must be used with caution in patients taking alpha(1)-adrenoceptors antagonists for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Although nonarteritic anterior ischaemic neuropathy has been reported in some users of the PDE5 inhibitors, there is no conclusive evidence that PDE5 inhibitors cause this rare effect. Tadalafil has a longer half-life than sildenafil or vardenafil, and a longer duration of action than sildenafil and vardenafil. Most preference studies have shown tadalafil to be preferred, but there are serious limitations to some of these studies. One approach to treatment is to give each patient a short- and long-acting agent, and for individuals to decide their preference.

Predictors of Tadalafil Efficacy in Men with Erectile Dysfunction: The SURE Study Comparing Two Dosing Regimens

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction may depend on patient characteristics.

AIM

To determine whether patient characteristics influence the efficacy of two tadalafil dosage regimens and to identify prognostic factors predictive of tadalafil efficacy.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, open-label study in which men with erectile dysfunction were randomized to tadalafil 20 mg either on demand or three times per week for a period of 5-6 weeks. After a 1-week washout period, patients were crossed over to the alternate regimen for another 5-6 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Score of the Erectile Function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function Questionnaire (IIEF) and percentage of positive responses to questions 3 and 5 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary.

RESULTS

A total of 4,262 patients were randomized. A normal EF domain score (> or =26) at the end of on-demand and three-times-per-week treatment was reported by 60.2% and 62.3% of patients, respectively. The percentage of patients who achieved a normal EF domain score and the percentages reporting positive responses to SEP3 and SEP5 depended on the severity of erectile dysfunction and the presence of certain comorbidities, irrespective of the tadalafil dosage regimen. On regression analysis, the two best predictors of tadalafil efficacy were the baseline score of the IIEF-EF domain and the baseline percentage of "Yes" responses to SEP2.

CONCLUSIONS

On-demand and three-times-per-week dosage regimens of tadalafil 20 mg were equally efficacious in men with erectile dysfunction. Among the possible prognostic factors tested in this study, baseline disease severity scores were the strongest predictors of efficacy endpoint scores.

The effect of tadalafil on psychosocial outcomes in Swedish men with erectile distress: a multicentre, non-randomised, open-label clinical study

A multicentre, non-randomised, open-label study assessed whether personal distress caused by erectile dysfunction (ED) affected psychosocial outcomes of tadalafil treatment. Eligible Swedish men at least 18 years old reporting > or =3-month history of ED were stratified into two groups (manifest or mild/no distress) based upon a distress question administered at enrollment. Tadalafil 20 mg was taken as needed for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the difference between the two distress groups in change from baseline in the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales (PAIRS) spontaneity domain. Secondary outcome measures were PAIRS sexual self-confidence and time concerns domains, Life Satisfaction (LiSat-11) checklist and a Global Assessment of Treatment Response. The study also assessed tolerability. Of 662 men enrolled, 88% had manifest distress and 12% had mild/no distress. Baseline-to-endpoint changes for PAIRS domains were not significantly different between groups. Baseline-to-endpoint changes in LiSat-11 items were not significantly different between groups except for satisfaction with sexual life. Compared with men without ED, below normal baseline satisfaction with partner relationship and family life were normalised at endpoint. Over 90% of men reported improved erection and ability to engage in sexual activity. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were headache, myalgia, dyspepsia, flushing and back pain. One man discontinued because of myalgia; 630 (95%) completed the study. In conclusion, erectile distress levels vary among patients with ED and distress can affect intra-familiar aspects of life, which may have implications for clinical practise. However, distress does not appear to hinder improvement in both mechanical and psychosocial outcomes of tadalafil treatment.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH—ED PHARMACOTHERAPY: Comparing Vardenafil and Sildenafil in the Treatment of Men with Erectile Dysfunction and Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Pooled Crossover Study

INTRODUCTION

Data from head-to-head clinical trials of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors are scarce, making it difficult for clinicians to differentiate among these agents to select the most appropriate treatment for their patients with erectile dysfunction (ED).

AIM

This randomized, double-blind, crossover head-to-head clinical trial compared patient preference, efficacy, and safety of vardenafil and sildenafil in men with ED and diabetes, hypertension, and/or hyperlipidemia.

METHODS

Prospective analysis was performed on two studies in which 1,057 men were randomized to vardenafil 20 mg (N = 530) or sildenafil 100 mg (2 x 50 mg encapsulated tablets) (N = 527) for 4 weeks. Following a 1-week washout, patients switched treatment for 4 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients were asked about overall preference: "Overall, which medication do you prefer?", plus 11 other preference questions relating to their ED treatment. Efficacy assessments after each treatment period included the erectile function (EF) domain score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF); Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary questions SEP2 and SEP3; Global Assessment Question (GAQ); and Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS). Data regarding adverse events were collected throughout the study.

RESULTS

A total of 931 men (mean age 57.9 years) were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Non-inferiority of vardenafil over sildenafil was achieved for overall preference (vardenafil 38.9%; sildenafil 34.5%; and no preference 26.6%). Additionally, the change from baseline in the EF domain score of the IIEF achieved nominal significance for vardenafil over sildenafil (10.00 vs. 9.40; P = 0.0052). Patients also had a higher percentage of positive responses for vardenafil for SEP2, SEP3, GAQ, and 12 of 19 questions on the TSS. Both drugs were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized, double-blind, head-to-head trial in ED patients with cardiovascular risk factors demonstrated noninferiority of vardenafil for overall preference. Vardenafil achieved nominal statistical superiority over sildenafil for several frequently used efficacy measures. Both drugs were well tolerated.

Psychosocial outcomes and drug attributes affecting treatment choice in men receiving sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: results of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover study

INTRODUCTION

Although sildenafil citrate (sildenafil) and tadalafil are efficacious and well-tolerated treatments for erectile dysfunction (ED), preference studies have shown that patients may favor one medication over the other.

AIM

To determine whether psychosocial outcomes differed when men with ED received tadalafil compared with sildenafil.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Measures included a treatment preference question, Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales (PAIRS), and Drug Attribute Questionnaire.

METHODS

Randomized, open-label, crossover study. After a 4-week baseline, men with ED (N = 367; mean age = 54 years; naïve to type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitor therapy) were randomized: tadalafil for 12 weeks then sildenafil for 12 weeks or vice versa (8-week dose optimization/4-week assessment phases). During dose optimization, patients started with 10 mg tadalafil, or 25 or 50 mg sildenafil and could titrate to their optimal dose (10 or 20 mg tadalafil; 25, 50, or 100 mg sildenafil). Medications were taken as needed. Patients completing both 12-week periods chose which medication to continue during an 8-week extension.

RESULTS

Of 291 men completing both treatment periods, 71% (N = 206) chose tadalafil and 29% (N = 85) chose sildenafil (P < 0.001) for the 8-week extension. When taking tadalafil compared with sildenafil men had higher mean endpoint scores on PAIRS Sexual Self-Confidence (tadalafil = 2.91 vs. sildenafil = 2.75; P < 0.001) and Spontaneity (tadalafil = 3.32 vs. sildenafil = 3.17; P < 0.001) Domains and a lower mean endpoint score on Time Concerns Domain (tadalafil = 2.2 vs. sildenafil = 2.59; P < 0.001). The two most frequently chosen drug attributes to explain treatment preference were ability to get an erection long after taking the medication and firmness of erections. Tadalafil and sildenafil were well tolerated with 12 (3.3%) patients discontinuing for an adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

As measured with PAIRS, men with ED had higher sexual self-confidence and spontaneity and less time concerns related to sexual encounters when treated with tadalafil compared with sildenafil. These psychosocial outcomes may help explain why more men (71%) preferred tadalafil for the treatment of ED in this clinical trial.

Efficacy and safety of tadalafil 5, 10, and 20 mg in Japanese men with erectile dysfunction: Results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and safety of tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, in Japanese men with erectile dysfunction (ED).

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week study enrolled 343 Japanese men with ED. The men were stratified into those with mild, moderate, or severe ED and then randomly assigned 1:1:1:1 to placebo and 5 mg, 10 mg, and 20 mg tadalafil. Co-primary outcomes were the International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain score, the percentage of "yes" responses to the Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Questions 2 and 3, and tolerability. Secondary outcomes included the International Index of Erectile Function intercourse satisfaction and overall satisfaction domain scores and the percentage of "yes" responses to a global assessment question.

RESULTS

The least square mean change from baseline was 7.5, 9.1, and 9.4 for 5, 10, and 20 mg tadalafil versus 2.1 for placebo for the International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain; 28.5, 36.0, and 36.5 for 5, 10, and 20 mg tadalafil versus 8.6 for placebo for Sexual Encounter Profile question 2; and 34.3, 47.3, and 50.8 for 5, 10, and 20 mg tadalafil versus 12.3 for placebo for Sexual Encounter Profile question 3, respectively (P <0.001 for all doses and all measures). Patients taking tadalafil had significantly greater changes from baseline for the intercourse satisfaction and overall satisfaction domains compared with patients taking placebo (P <0.001). Also, 76.5%, 81.4%, and 83.7% of patients taking 5, 10, and 20 mg tadalafil, respectively, reported improved erections (global assessment question) versus 31.4% of patients taking placebo (P <0.001). Most (98%) treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. One patient (tadalafil 5 mg) discontinued because of an adverse event (ureteral calculus). Of the 343 patients, 302 (88%) completed the study. No deaths were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

All doses of tadalafil studied were efficacious and well tolerated in Japanese men with ED.