The Northeast Adolescent Project: a collaborative effort to address teen-age pregnancy in Houston, Texas

Should case management be considered a component of obstetrical interventions for pregnancies at risk of preterm birth?

Preterm birth remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among nonanomalous neonates in the United States. Unfortunately, preterm birth rates remain high despite current medical interventions such as progestogen supplementation and cerclage placement. Case management, which encompasses coordinated care aimed at providing a more comprehensive and supportive environment, is a key component in improving health and reducing costs in other areas of medicine. However, it has not made its way into the general lexicon and practice of obstetrical care. Case management intended for decreasing prematurity or ameliorating its consequences may include specialty clinics, social services, coordination of specialty services such as nutrition counseling, home visits or frequent phone calls by specially trained personnel, and other elements described herein. It is not currently included in nor is it advocated for as a recommended prematurity prevention approach in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists or Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine guidelines for medically indicated or spontaneous preterm birth prevention. Our review of existing evidence finds consistent reductions or trends toward reductions in preterm birth with case management, particularly among individuals with high a priori risk of preterm birth across systematic reviews, metaanalyses, and randomized controlled studies. These findings suggest that case management has substantial potential to improve the environmental, behavioral, social, and psychological factors with patients at risk of preterm birth.

The effectiveness of adolescent-specific prenatal interventions on improving attendance and reducing harm during and after birth: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Adolescent pregnancy has been associated with poor pregnancy outcomes including pre-term birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW) and perinatal death.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the effect of adolescent-specific interventions on reducing PTB, LBW, and perinatal death and increasing prenatal care attendance.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Possible studies for inclusion were identified by a comprehensive search of OvidSP MEDLINE (limits: humans, 1990-present), EMBASE (limits: humans, 1990-2015), Popline and Global Health Database from the World Health Organisation (WHO) and PubMed International scientific databases, and references of identified articles were searched from 1990 to present.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All types of controlled studies of prenatal interventions were exclusive to adolescents and at least one of the outcomes of interest.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Investigators identified relevant studies and entered the data in a pro forma. Data were summarised as forest plots and narrative synthesis.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-two studies (three randomised controlled trials (RCTs), four prospective cohort studies, nine retrospective cohort studies, five case controls and one natural experiment) were included with all but one study being carried out in higher-income countries. Seven of the 16 studies reporting on PTB found a statistically significant reduction in PTB rates between adolescent-specific prenatal care (intervention) and non-age specific prenatal care odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) ranged from OR: 0.15 (95% CI: 0.03-0.83) to OR: 0.59 (95% CI: 0.45-0.78). Nine of the 12 studies reported statistically significant higher mean prenatal attendance rates among the intervention group compared to controls (ranging from a mean number of visits of 14.3 vs. 10.7 p<0.001 to 10.8 vs. 7.6 visits p<0.001). The type and construct of the interventions, their implementation and local population differed sufficiently that a statistical synthesis was deemed inappropriate.

CONCLUSION

There is some evidence that adolescent-specific programs can increase prenatal attendance and reduce the risk of PTB and low birth rate but their effect on perinatal death is uncertain. There is a distinct lack of evidence of the effectiveness of these interventions for adolescents living in low-middle income countries, despite having the majority of adolescent pregnancies, and associated risk of harm. No high-quality intervention studies were identified. Robust, cluster-based RCTs are an urgent necessity to quantify the impact of these interventions and to identify factors contributing to their success.