Histamine: the sole mediator of pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion

Murine Models of Gastric Corpus Preneoplasia

Intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma evolves in a field of pre-existing metaplasia. Over the past 20 years, a number of murine models have been developed to address aspects of the physiology and pathophysiology of metaplasia induction. Although none of these models has achieved true recapitulation of the induction of adenocarcinoma, they have led to important insights into the factors that influence the induction and progression of metaplasia. Here, we review the pathologic definitions relevant to alterations in gastric corpus lineages and classification of metaplasia by specific lineage markers. In addition, we review present murine models of the induction and progression of spasmolytic polypeptide (TFF2)-expressing metaplasia, the predominant metaplastic lineage observed in murine models. These models provide a basis for the development of a broader understanding of the physiological and pathophysiological roles of metaplasia in the stomach.

Dual action of prostaglandin E2 on gastric acid secretion through different EP-receptor subtypes in the rat

We examined the role of prostaglandin E (EP) receptor subtypes in the regulation of gastric acid secretion in the rat. Under urethane anesthesia, the stomach was superfused with saline, and the acid secretion was determined at pH 7.0 by adding 50 mM NaOH. The acid secretion was stimulated by intravenous infusion of histamine or pentagastrin. Various EP agonists were administered intravenously, whereas EP antagonists were given subcutaneously 30 min or intravenously 10 min before EP agonists. PGE(2) suppressed the acid secretion stimulated by either histamine or pentagastrin in a dose-dependent manner. The acid inhibitory effect of PGE(2) was mimicked by sulprostone (EP(1)/EP(3) agonist) but not butaprost (EP(2) agonist) or AE1-329 (EP(4) agonist). The inhibitory effect of sulprostone, which was not affected by ONO-8711 (EP(1) antagonist), was more potent against pentagastrin- (50% inhibition dose: 3.6 mug/kg) than histamine-stimulated acid secretion (50% inhibition dose: 18.0 mug/kg). Pentagastrin increased the luminal release of histamine, and this response was also inhibited by sulprostone. On the other hand, AE1-329 (EP(4) agonist) stimulated the acid secretion in vagotomized animals with a significant increase in luminal histamine. This effect of AE1-329 was totally abolished by cimetidine as well as AE3-208 (EP(4) antagonist). These results suggest that PGE(2) has a dual effect on acid secretion: inhibition mediated by EP(3) receptors and stimulation through EP(4) receptors. The former effect may be brought about by suppression at both parietal and enterochromaffin-like cells, whereas the latter effect may be mediated by histamine released from enterochromaffin-like cells.

Gastric submucosal microdialysis: a method to study gastrin- and food-evoked mobilization of ECL-cell histamine in conscious rats

Rat stomach ECL cells are rich in histamine and chromogranin A-derived peptides, such as pancreastatin. Gastrin causes the parietal cells to secrete acid by flooding them with histamine from the ECL cells. In the past, gastric histamine release has been studied using anaesthetized, surgically manipulated animals or isolated gastric mucosa, glands or ECL cells. We monitored gastric histamine mobilization in intact conscious rats by subjecting them to gastric submucosal microdialysis. A microdialysis probe was implanted into the submucosa of the acid-producing part of the stomach (day 1). The rats had access to food and water or were deprived of food (48 h), starting on day 2 after implantation of the probe. On day 4, the rats received food or gastrin (intravenous infusion), and sampling of microdialysate commenced. Samples (flow rate 1.2 microl min(-1)) were collected every 20 or 60 min, and the histamine and pancreastatin concentrations were determined. The serum gastrin concentration was determined in tail vein blood. Exogenous gastrin (4-h infusion) raised microdialysate histamine and pancreastatin dose-dependently. This effect was prevented by gastrin receptor blockade (YM022). Depletion of ECL-cell histamine by alpha-fluoromethylhistidine, an irreversible inhibitor of the histamine-forming enzyme, suppressed the gastrin-evoked release of histamine but not that of pancreastatin. Fasting lowered serum gastrin and microdialysate histamine by 50%, while refeeding raised serum gastrin and microdialysate histamine and pancreastatin 3-fold. We conclude that histamine mobilized by gastrin and food intake derives from ECL cells because: 1) Histamine and pancreastatin were released concomitantly, 2) histamine mobilization following gastrin or food intake was prevented by gastrin receptor blockade, and 3) mobilization of histamine (but not pancreastatin) was abolished by alpha-fluoromethylhistidine. Hence, gastric submucosal microdialysis allows us to monitor the mobilization of ECL-cell histamine in intact conscious rats under various experimental conditions not previously accessible to study. While gastrin receptor blockade lowered post-prandial release of ECL-cell histamine by about 80%, unilateral vagotomy reduced post-prandial mobilization of ECL-cell histamine by about 50%. Hence, both gastrin and vagal excitation contribute to the post-prandial release of ECL-cell histamine.

CCK2 receptor antagonists: pharmacological tools to study the gastrin-ECL cell-parietal cell axis

Gastrin-recognizing CCK2 receptors are expressed in parietal cells and in so-called ECL cells in the acid-producing part of the stomach. ECL cells are endocrine/paracrine cells that produce and store histamine and chromogranin A (CGA)-derived peptides, such as pancreastatin. The ECL cells are the principal cellular transducer of the gastrin-acid signal. Activation of the CCK2 receptor results in mobilization of histamine (and pancreastatin) from the ECL cells with consequent activation of the parietal cell histamine H2 receptor. Thus, release of ECL-cell histamine is a key event in the process of gastrin-stimulated acid secretion. The oxyntic mucosal histidine decarboxylase (HDC) activity and the serum pancreastatin concentration are useful markers for the activity of the gastrin-ECL cell axis. Powerful and selective CCK2 receptor antagonits have been developed from a series of benzodiazepine compounds. These agents are useful tools to study how gastrin controls the ECL cells. Conversely, the close control of ECL cells by gastrin makes the gastrin-ECL cell axis well suited for evaluating the antagonistic potential of CCK2 receptor antagonists with the ECL-cell HDC activity as a notably sensitive and reliable parameter. The CCK2 receptor antagonists YF476, YM022, RP73870, JB93182 and AG041R were found to cause prompt inhibition of ECL-cell histamine and pancreastatin secretion and synthesis. The circulating pancreastatin concentration is raised, was lowered when the action of gastrin on the ECL cells was blocked by the CCK2 receptor antagonists. These effects were associated with inhibition of gastrin-stimulated acid secretion. In addition, sustained receptor blockade was manifested in permanently decreased oxyntic mucosal HDC activity, histamine concentration and HDC mRNA and CGA mRNA concentrations. CCK2 receptor blockade also induced hypergastrinemia, which probably reflects the impaired gastric acid secretion (no acid feedback inhibition of gastrin release). Upon withdrawal of the CCK2 receptor antagonists, their effects on the ECL cells were readily reversible. In conclusion, gastrin mobilizes histamine from the ECL cells, thereby provoking the parietal cells to secrete acid. While CCK2 receptor blockade prevents gastrin from evoking acid secretion, it is without effect on basal and vagally stimulated acid secretion. We conclude that specific and potent CCK2 receptor antagonists represent powerful tools to explore the functional significance of the ECL cells.

Developmental regulation of gastric somatostatin secretion in the sheep

Gastric somatostatin (SRIF) regulates gastric acidity by inhibiting gastric acid and gastrin secretion. SRIF secretion is increased by gastric acidity and also directly by regulators of gastric acid secretion such as gastrin. This direct effect has not been described in the developing animal, nor have the roles of intermediaries such as histamine and gastric acidity been defined. The present study aimed to establish the regulatory role of gastrin and histamine during development on SRIF secretion and also to determine whether the effects of gastrin and histamine are independent of gastric pH. Pentagastrin and histamine were infused on separate occasions into fetal sheep, newborn lambs, and 28-day-old lambs. To determine the roles of endogenous histamine and gastric pH, ranitidine (a histamine-2 receptor antagonist) and omeprazole (a H+/K+ ATPase inhibitor) were coinfused with the agonists. Plasma SRIF and gastrin concentrations were measured by RIA. Pentagastrin stimulated SRIF secretion in the fetus after 131 days of gestation (term is 147 days), whereas stimulation by histamine was effective only after birth. The SRIF stimulatory effect of pentagastrin in 28-day-old lambs was abolished by ranitidine, which also reduced this effect in the adult sheep. This inhibitory effect of ranitidine was shown to be a result of blockade of stimulatory H2 receptors, because in the adult blockade of acid secretion with omeprazole failed to attenuate the response of histamine. These results indicate that in the fetus, gastrin receptors, but not histamine receptors, are functionally involved in the stimulation of SRIF secretion. After birth, both gastrin and histamine stimulate SRIF, but the effect of gastrin is mediated at least in part by the release of endogenous histamine. These responses occur independently of changes in gastric acidity, supporting the concept of a direct negative feedback between SRIF and gastrin.

Transient increase of blood histamine level induced by pentagastrin. Continuous monitoring by in vivo microdialysis

BACKGROUND

Since few studies of (penta)gastrin-induced histamine release from the gastric mucosa into blood has been performed, an effect of pentagastrin on histamine level of rat blood was examined by using the in vivo microdialysis method.

METHODS

Pentagastrin was perfused through the microdialysis probe implanted into the jugular vein of urethane-anesthetized rats or in urethane-anesthetized, totally gastrectomized rats, and dialysis samples of blood were concurrently collected. Histidine decarboxylase (HDC) activities and histamine contents in the glandular stomach and gastric acid output after pentagastrin stimulation were also investigated.

RESULTS

Pentagastrin induced a transient increase of blood histamine in a dose-dependent manner but failed to cause any increase of blood histamine in the totally gastrectomized rat. Pentagastrin also induced increases of the HDC activity in the glandular stomach and of the gastric acid output. The peak histamine level in blood occurred 40 min after pentagastrin perfusion, whereas the peak acid secretion occurred after 80-120 min and then leveled off.

CONCLUSIONS

The transient increase of blood histamine induced by pentagastrin is attributable to the histamine released from enterochromaffin-like cells and could be monitored by using the in vivo microdialysis method.

Famotidine, a histamine-2-receptor antagonist, inhibits the increase in rat gastric H+/K(+)-ATPase mRNA induced by intravenous infusion of gastrin 17 and histamine

We examined the effects of gastrin and histamine on rat gastric H+/K(+)-ATPase, the enzyme responsible for H+ secretion, gene expression in vivo. Gastrin 17 (G 17) or histamine dihydrochloride (histamine) was continuously infused through the femoral vein of anesthetized rats. Gastric H+/K(+)-ATPase mRNA levels were measured using northern blot analysis. Infusion of G 17 and histamine increased the H+/K(+)-ATPase mRNA level significantly compared with basal control level or vehicle control level (P < 0.01). However, pretreatment with famotidine, a potent histamine-2 (H2)-receptor antagonist, inhibited the increase of rat gastric H+/K(+)-ATPase mRNA following G 17 and histamine infusion. These findings indicate that both histamine and G 17 increase expression of H+/K(+)-ATPase mRNA by activating H2 receptor on the parietal cell.

The role of gastric histamine release in the acid secretory response to pentagastrin and methacholine in the dog

We have previously demonstrated that both pentagastrin and methacholine can stimulate histamine release from the canine stomach during short term administration of the secretagogues into the gastrosplenic artery. In this study we tested the hypothesis that gastric histamine release determines the acid secretory response to acid secretagogues. Increasing doses of pentagastrin (2, 6, and 20 ng/kg/min) and methacholine (0.1, 0.3, and 1 micrograms/min) were infused into the gastrosplenic artery in dogs, while gastric acid output, histamine and N tau-methyl histamine secretory rates were monitored. Histamine and N tau-methyl histamine concentrations in plasma were measured using GC/NICI-MS. Increasing doses of pentagastrin resulted in increasing gastric output. Total histamine secretory rate expressed as the sum of histamine and N tau-methyl histamine secretory rate showed a significant increase above basal with the two highest doses of pentagastrin. Regression analysis correlating the dose of pentagastrin to gastric acid output gave a correlation coefficient of 0.586 which was very significant. Regression analysis correlating the total histamine secretory rate to acid output gave a correlation coefficient of 0.498 which was also very significant. Increasing doses of methacholine also resulted in a dose-dependent increase in acid output. Histamine secretory rates showed a statistically significant increase above basal only at the 1 microgram/min infusion rate, however, the total histamine secretory rates (histamine + N tau-methyl histamine) were no longer significant at any of the doses of methacholine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Histamine as an intermediate growth factor in genesis of gastric ECLomas associated with hypergastrinemia in mastomys

Profound and sustained inhibition of gastric acid secretion has been associated with development of carcinoid tumors of the fundic enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells in rodents. While ECL cell hyperplasia has been recognized in humans, the development of carcinoid tumors is rare and often confined to patients under treatment for gastrinoma related to the multiple endocrine neoplasia type I (MEN1) syndrome. The Mastomys was utilized as a model for the rapid induction of ECLomas by insurmountable acid secretory blockade induced by the pharmacologically irreversible H2-receptor antagonist, loxtidine. Loxtidine-induced ECL cell hyperplasia and neoplasia were compared in the absence of presence of cyproheptadine (0.5 mg/kg), an H1-receptor antagonist. Loxtidine administration resulted in a significant increase in ECL cell hyperplasia and neoplasia as well as an increase in ECL cell number, mucosal thickness, plasma gastrin levels, and stomach weight. Cyproheptadine ameliorated loxtidine-induced ECL cell hyperplasia and neoplasia and significantly decreased loxtidine-stimulated increases in ECL cell number. Nevertheless, cyproheptadine failed to alter the loxtidine-induced increase in plasma gastrin, stomach weight or mucosal height. The results indicate that cyproheptadine, an H1-receptor antagonist, inhibits loxtidine-induced ECL cell hyperplasia independent of any effects on serum gastrin.

The effect of CCKB/gastrin antagonists on stimulated gastric acid secretion in the anaesthetized rat

1. The urethane-anaesthetized, vagotomised rat preparation was used to investigate the effects of the histamine H2-antagonist ranitidine, the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole and the CCKB/gastrin antagonists CI-988, PD 136450 and L-365,260 on pentagastrin-, histamine- and bethanechol-induced gastric acid secretion. 2. The novel CCKB/gastrin antagonists CI-988 and PD 136450, and L-365,260 dose-dependently inhibited pentagastrin-induced secretion. The ED50 value for PD 136450 was 0.05 mumol kg-1, the same following intravenous or subcutaneous administration. 3. CI-988 and PD 136450 administered subcutaneously at dose levels highly effective for antagonism of pentagastrin responses had no effect on basal acid secretion. 4. Ranitidine inhibited pentagastrin-, bethanechol-, and histamine-induced acid secretion, whereas the CCKB/gastrin antagonists inhibited only the secretory response to pentagastrin. 5. The selective CCKA antagonist, devazepide, was inactive at up to 300 mumol kg-1 i.p. against the three stimulants of acid secretion. 6. CI-988 and PD 136450 will be useful research tools with which to investigate the role of CCKB/gastrin receptors in gastric acid secretion and the trophic activities of gastrin and cholecystokinin (CCK) on the gastrointestinal tract.

Aspects of the regulation of gastric histamine release

Histamine is found in large amounts in the gastric mucosa and plays an essential role in the regulation of acid secretion. It is thought to stimulate acid secretion directly after being released by the other two major secretagogues (gastrin and acetylcholine) (the mediator hypothesis) or to potentiate the action of the other two secretagogues (the interaction hypothesis). Recent studies with isolated, vascularly perfused rat stomach have shown that gastrin in physiologic concentrations elicits a release of histamine sufficient to explain its acid-stimulatory effect. Vagal nerve stimulation, on the other hand, only gives a faint histamine release, indicating that the vagal acid stimulation is mainly mediated by a direct stimulation of the parietal cell. Furthermore, the gastrin-stimulated histamine release seems to be mediated by a calcium-dependent mechanism. Somatostatin inhibits gastrin-stimulated histamine release via a paracrine mechanism, and a prostaglandin E1 analogue (misoprostol) has been shown to be a potent inhibitor of base-line and gastrin-stimulated histamine release. These studies show that the modulation of histamine release may be a central regulatory mechanism of gastric acid secretion. Although these studies have been done in rats, there are indications that these results are of a general nature nd valid for other species as well.

Mechanisms of stimulation of acid production in parietal cells isolated from the pig gastric mucosa

Sequential incubations with pronase and collagenase of pig gastric mucosa resulted in single cell preparations containing 10-20% parietal cells, which could be enriched further to 85-95% purity by density-gradient centrifugation followed by elutriation. Acid production of the isolated cells was measured by means of aminopyrine accumulation in their acid compartments. When small pieces of the mucosa were pretreated for 1 h in the presence of either histamine, pentagastrin or carbachol before preparation of cells, the ability of the subsequently isolated cells to produce acid was increased. In parietal cells isolated from resting (not pretreated) mucosa pentagastrin, carbachol and also adrenaline increased the histamine-stimulated aminopyrine accumulation (50-90% increase). Adrenaline alone had no significant effect on the aminopyrine accumulation. In the presence of 10(-4) M histamine the apparent EC50 for adrenaline was 5 X 10(-7) M. Adrenaline, histamine, forskolin and isobutylmethylxanthin (IBMX) increased the formation of cAMP in purified parietal cells. The three 'classical' secretagogues histamine, pentagastrin and carbachol, but also IBMX and forskolin, increased the cytosolic free Ca2+ from approximately 1.5 X 10(-7) M to 2.2-3.5 X 10(-7) M but adrenaline and dibutyryl cyclic AMP did not. Thus the present results indicate that there are - in addition to histaminergic H2 receptors - specific cholinergic, gastrinergic and adrenergic receptors on the plasma membrane and that there are separate cAMP and Ca2+-dependent stimulatory pathways in the parietal cell.

Gastrin produces an immediate and dose-dependent histamine release preceding acid secretion in the totally isolated, vascularly perfused rat stomach

Increasing doses of gastrin 1-17 (G1-17) were administered to totally isolated, vascularly perfused rat stomachs prestimulated with the phosphodiesterase inhibitor isobutyl methylxanthine (IMX). Vascular and luminal histamine outputs and luminal acid output were monitored at short intervals. G1-17 induced an immediate histamine release to the vascular perfusate, preceding the increase in acid secretion by approximately 10 min. Vascular histamine output increased from a base line (IMX only) of 4.0 +/- 0.4 to a maximum of 34.5 +/- 7.3 nmol/60 min (mean +/- SEM) after 1040 pM G1-17, and acid output from 8.0 +/- 2.8 to 61.5 +/- 7.0 mumol/60 min after 520 pM G1-17. Acid output was correlated to vascular histamine release (r = 0.64, p less than 0.001). Gastrin produced a histamine release giving gastric venous concentrations of the same magnitude as the concentration of histamine necessary to induce a comparable acid response. Histamine release to the lumen, on the other hand, paralleled the acid secretion in time, suggesting it to be a passive phenomenon secondary to acid secretion. Thus, the present study for the first time shows that gastrin induces vascular histamine release of such a magnitude that this substance could be the mediator of the gastrin effect on acid secretion.

Gastric acid secretion in the totally isolated, vascularly perfused rat stomach. A selective muscarinic-1 agent does, whereas gastrin does not, augment maximal histamine-stimulated acid secretion

The gastric acid secretion in response to graded doses of gastrin, histamine, impromidine (a selective H2-receptor agonist), and the muscarinic-1 agonist McN-A-343 was studied in the totally isolated, vascularly perfused rat stomach. Combinations of stimulants at doses giving maximal acid secretion for each secretatogue were thereafter tested. All stimulants increased the gastric acid output significantly compared with the base-line output (7.2 +/- 2.0 mu eq/h). Gastrin induced significant increases in acid outputs at very low and physiologically relevant concentrations with a threshold concentration of 65 pM. Nevertheless, maximal gastrin-stimulated acid secretion represented only 55% of the maximal histamine-stimulated acid output of 154.8 +/- 10.0 mu eq/h. Impromidine and McN-A-343 induced a maximum 59% and 34% of maximal histamine-stimulated acid output, respectively. Adding gastrin to the maximal histamine of impromidine-stimulated stomachs did not increase the acid secretion further. Histamine and McN-A-343 in combination, however, induced a more than additive increase in the gastric acid output (232.0 +/- 14.7 mu eq/h) than did histamine and McN-A-343 separately (154.8 +/- 10.0 and 53.0 +/- 6.7 mu eq/h, respectively). The results indicate that in the rat, gastrin stimulates the parietal cell indirectly via histamine release, whereas muscarinic agents (cholinergic stimulation) act directly via a separate receptor.

Effects of cimetidine, atropine and pirenzepine on basal and stimulated gastric acid secretion in the rat

The gastric anti-secretagogue effects of cimetidine (a histamine H2-receptor antagonist) and of atropine (a non-selective muscarinic receptor antagonist) and pirenzepine (a selective muscarinic M1-receptor antagonist) were examined in conscious gastric fistula rats both under basal conditions and after stimulation with maximal doses of pentagastrin and histamine. Cimetidine blocked basal as well as stimulated acid secretion. The cimetidine dose-response curves and the calculated ED50 values were similar in the different experimental situations. Atropine blocked equally effectively the basal and the stimulated acid secretion. The antisecretagogue and pupil dilating effects were compared. The ED50 values for the anti-secretagogue effect and for the pupil dilating effect were in the same range though not identical. Pirenzepine blocked acid secretion, whether basal or stimulated, with similar potency. It was much more potent to block acid secretion than to cause pupil dilatation. The greater potency of pirenzepine to block acid secretion than to cause pupil dilatation suggests that the cholinergic pathway of acid secretion involves neuronal muscarinic M1-receptors within the intramural ganglia of the stomach wall. In conclusion, cimetidine, atropine and pirenzepine effectively blocked basal as well as pentagastrin- and histamine-stimulated acid secretion, indicating that both histamine and acetylcholine are important in the control of the parietal cell. Histamine has been claimed to be the final common chemical mediator of acid secretion. This view is at odds with the fact that muscarinic blocking agents also inhibit basal and stimulated acid secretion.

Comparing binding of histamine and H2-antagonist with their effects on gastric acid secretion

A microsomal fraction from isolated frog gastric mucosa was used to study the binding of labeled histamine, labeled metiamide (a histamine H2-antagonist), and competition between labeled histamine and unlabeled metiamide. The separation of free from bound ligand was done by gel chromatography. The acid secretion was studied in frog gastric mucosa in vitro by a pH-stat method. The binding data could be interpreted in terms of two independent binding sites for both histamine and metiamide. However, the competition between histamine and metiamide does not support the independence of the sites. Moreover, the dissociation kinetics of labeled metiamide in the presence of unlabeled metiamide is non-monotone and, thus, indicates cooperativity. In the physiological studies, the dependence of the rate of acid secretion on histamine stimulation occurs within very narrow limits, which is the result of characteristics other than related to binding. However, the total amount of acid secreted caused by a pulse of histamine does indicate two sites, of which the high-affinity site is the more effective. Metiamide inhibition of acid secretion can be interpreted as an interaction between high-affinity sites of histamine and metiamide. Overall, studies involving physiological effects provide less precise data than the direct binding studies.