Efferent renal sympathetic nerve stimulation in vivo. Effects on regional renal haemodynamics in the Wistar rat, studied by laser-Doppler technique

Sympathetic nerve-derived ATP regulates renal medullary vasa recta diameter via pericyte cells: a role for regulating medullary blood flow?

Pericyte cells are now known to be a novel locus of blood flow control, being able to regulate capillary diameter via their unique morphology and expression of contractile proteins. We have previously shown that exogenous ATP causes constriction of vasa recta via renal pericytes, acting at a variety of membrane bound P2 receptors on descending vasa recta (DVR), and therefore may be able to regulate medullary blood flow (MBF). Regulation of MBF is essential for appropriate urine concentration and providing essential oxygen and nutrients to this region of high, and variable, metabolic demand. Various sources of endogenous ATP have been proposed, including from epithelial, endothelial, and red blood cells in response to stimuli such as mechanical stimulation, local acidosis, hypoxia, and exposure to various hormones. Extensive sympathetic innervation of the nephron has previously been shown, however the innervation reported has focused around the proximal and distal tubules, and ascending loop of Henle. We hypothesize that sympathetic nerves are an additional source of ATP acting at renal pericytes and therefore regulate MBF. Using a rat live kidney slice model in combination with video imaging and confocal microscopy techniques we firstly show sympathetic nerves in close proximity to vasa recta pericytes in both the outer and inner medulla. Secondly, we demonstrate pharmacological stimulation of sympathetic nerves in situ (by tyramine) evokes pericyte-mediated vasoconstriction of vasa recta capillaries; inhibited by the application of the P2 receptor antagonist suramin. Lastly, tyramine-evoked vasoconstriction of vasa recta by pericytes is significantly less than ATP-evoked vasoconstriction. Sympathetic innervation may provide an additional level of functional regulation in the renal medulla that is highly localized. It now needs to be determined under which physiological/pathophysiological circumstances that sympathetic innervation of renal pericytes is important.

Effect of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide in the neural control of intrarenal haemodynamics in anaesthetized normotensive rats

AIMS

This study examined the interaction between reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide (NO) in mediating the decrease in renal blood flow (RBF) evoked by sympathetic renal nerve stimulation (RNS).

METHODS

Groups of male Wistar rats were subjected to RNS at different frequencies prior to, and following, an infusion of: (i) tempol, the superoxide dismutase (SOD) mimetic, (ii) tempol plus the hydrogen peroxide-degrading enzyme catalase (tem + cat), (iii) diethyldithiocarbamic acid (DETC), a SOD inhibitor, (iv) the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor, L-nitro-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) alone, or (v) L-NAME followed by tempol, into the kidney cortico-medullary border (CMB). Blood perfusion within the cortical (CBP) and medullary (MBP) regions of the kidney was measured using Laser-Doppler flowmetry.

RESULTS

Infusion of tempol CMB significantly attenuated RNS-evoked reductions in CBP (by 22% at 8 Hz; P < 0.05), but not MBP. When tempol and catalase were co-infused to reduce both ROS and hydrogen peroxide (H2 O2 ), respectively, there was a significantly greater attenuation of the RNS-evoked reduction in CBP compared with that of tempol alone. Infusion of either DETC or L-NAME alone did not significantly affect the CBP or MBP responses to RNS. Similarly, RNS following tempol infusion with L-NAME also had no effect on CBP and MBP over and above the group that received tempol alone.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that reactive oxygen species such as superoxide and H2 O2 have a direct role in reducing renal vascular compliance in response to RNS, rather than indirectly through scavenging NO.

Systemic arterial and venous determinants of renal hemodynamics in congestive heart failure

Heart and kidney interactions are fascinating, in the sense that failure of the one organ strongly affects the function of the other. In this review paper, we analyze how principal driving forces for glomerular filtration and renal blood flow are changed in heart failure. Moreover, renal autoregulation and modulation of neurohumoral factors, which can both have repercussions on renal function, are analyzed. Two paradigms seem to apply. One is that the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), and extracellular volume control are the three main determinants of renal function in heart failure. The other is that the classical paradigm to analyze renal dysfunction that is widely applied in nephrology also applies to the pathophysiology of heart failure: pre-renal, intra-renal, and post-renal alterations together determine glomerular filtration. At variance with the classical paradigm is that the most important post-renal factor in heart failure seems renal venous hypertension that, by increasing renal tubular pressure, decreases GFR. When different pharmacological strategies to inhibit the RAS and SNS and to assist renal volume control are considered, there is a painful lack in knowledge about how widely applied drugs affect primary driving forces for ultrafiltration, renal autoregulation, and neurohumoral control. We call for more clinical physiological studies.

Renal sympathetic nerves modulate erythropoietin plasma levels after transient hemorrhage in rats

In contrast to other sympathetic outflow tracts, renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) decreases in response to hypotensive hemorrhage. The functional significance of this "paradox" is not known. We tested the hypothesis that RSNA modulates renal perfusion and thus erythropoietin (EPO) release after transient hypotensive hemorrhage in anesthetized rats. Plasma EPO was measured before and after 30 min of transient hypotensive hemorrhage (i.e., -40 mmHg from mean baseline blood pressure, followed by reinfusion of shed blood) and 120 min thereafter in sham-denervated rats, and after renal denervation (DNX) or bilateral cervical vagotomy (VX) to abolish/blunt the RSNA decrease mediated by a cardiopulmonary reflex. RSNA, renal Doppler flow, renal vascular resistance (RVR), resistance index, and oxygen delivery/uptake (Do(2)/Vo(2)) were measured. RSNA decreased in intact animals (-40 +/- 5% from baseline, P < 0.05). This was blunted by VX. With intact nerves, EPO level did not increase. In DNX rats, EPO was increased at minute 120 (49 +/- 3 vs. 74 +/- 2 mU/ml; P < 0.05), in VX rats this (47 +/- 2 vs. 62 +/- 4 mU/ml; P < 0.05) was less pronounced. Do(2) in DNX rats was lower compared with intact and VX rats (0.25 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.51 +/- 0.06 and 0.54 +/- 0.05 ml O(2)/min; P < 0.05) due to lower Doppler flow and increased RVR. RVR and Do(2) were similar in intact and VX rats, but resistance index differed between all groups (0.70 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.78 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.85 +/- 0.02; P < 0.05, intact vs. VX vs. DNX), indicating differential reactivity of renal vasculature. Vo(2) was unaffected by VX and DNX. Renal sympathoinhibition during hypotensive hemorrhage might help to preserve sufficient oxygenation of renal tissue by modulation of hemodynamic mechanisms that act to adapt renal oxygen availability to demand.

Angiotensin II and nitric oxide in neural control of intrarenal blood flow

We investigated the roles of the renin-angiotensin system and the significance of interactions between angiotensin II and nitric oxide, in responses of regional kidney perfusion to electrical renal nerve stimulation (RNS) in pentobarbital sodium-anesthetized rabbits. Under control conditions, RNS (0.5–8 Hz) reduced total renal blood flow (RBF; −89 ± 3% at 8 Hz) and cortical perfusion (CBF; −90 ± 2% at 8 Hz) more than medullary perfusion (MBF; −55 ± 5% at 8 Hz). Angiotensin II type 1 (AT1)-receptor antagonism (candesartan) blunted RNS-induced reductions in RBF ( P = 0.03), CBF ( P = 0.007), and MBF ( P = 0.04), particularly at 4 and 8 Hz. Nitric oxide synthase inhibition with NG-nitro-l-arginine (l-NNA) enhanced RBF ( P = 0.003), CBF ( P = 0.001), and MBF ( P = 0.03) responses to RNS, particularly at frequencies of 2 Hz and less. After candesartan pretreatment, l-NNA significantly enhanced RNS-induced reductions in RBF ( P = 0.04) and CBF ( P = 0.007) but not MBF ( P = 0.66). Renal arterial infusion of angiotensin II (5 ng·kg−1·min−1) selectively enhanced responses of MBF to RNS in l-NNA-pretreated but not in vehicle-pretreated rabbits. In contrast, greater doses of angiotensin II (5–15 ng·kg−1·min−1) blunted responses of MBF to RNS in rabbits with intact nitric oxide synthase. These results suggest that endogenous angiotensin II enhances, whereas nitric oxide blunts, neurally mediated vasoconstriction in the renal cortical and medullary circulations. In the renal medulla, but not the cortex, angiotensin II also appears to be able to blunt neurally mediated vasoconstriction.

Mechanisms underlying the differential control of blood flow in the renal medulla and cortex

There is much evidence that the medullary circulation plays a key role in regulating renal salt and water handling and, accordingly, the long-term level of arterial pressure. It has also recently become clear that various regulatory factors can affect medullary blood flow (MBF) differently from cortical blood flow (CBF). It appears likely that the influence of hormonal and neural factors on the control of arterial pressure is mediated partly through their impact on MBF. In this review, we focus on the mechanisms underlying the differential control of MBF and CBF, particularly the relative insensitivity of MBF to vasoconstrictors such as angiotensin II, endothelin-1 and the sympathetic nerves. The vascular architecture of the kidney appears to be arranged in a way that protects the renal medulla from ischaemic insults, with juxtamedullary arterioles, the source of MBF, having larger calibre than their counterparts in other kidney regions. Indeed, recent studies using vascular casting methodology suggest that juxtamedullary glomerular arterioles are not the chief regulators of MBF, which is consistent with the idea that outer medullary descending vasa recta play a key role in MBF control. Release of vasoactive paracrine factors such as nitric oxide and various eicosanoids from the vascular endothelium, and probably also from the tubular epithelium, appear to differentially modulate responses of MBF and CBF to hormonal and neural factors. The prevailing intrarenal hormonal milieu and existing haemodynamic conditions also appear to strongly modulate these responses, indicating that multiple control systems interact to regulate regional kidney blood flow at an integrative level.

Neural control of renal medullary perfusion

There is strong evidence that the renal medullary circulation plays a key role in long-term blood pressure control. This, and evidence implicating sympathetic overactivity in development of hypertension, provides the need for understanding how sympathetic nerves affect medullary blood flow (MBF). The precise vascular elements that regulate MBF under physiological conditions are unknown, but likely include the outer medullary portions of descending vasa recta and afferent and efferent arterioles of juxtamedullary glomeruli, all of which receive dense sympathetic innervation. Many early studies of the impact of sympathetic drive on MBF were flawed, both because of the methods used for measuring MBF and because single and often intense neural stimuli were tested. Recent studies have established that MBF is less sensitive than cortical blood flow (CBF) to electrical renal nerve stimulation, particularly at low stimulus intensities. Indeed, MBF appears to be refractory to increases in endogenous renal sympathetic nerve activity within the physiological range in all but the most extreme cases. Multiple mechanisms appear to operate in concert to blunt the impact of sympathetic drive on MBF, including counter-regulatory roles of nitric oxide and perhaps even paradoxical angiotensin II-induced vasodilatation. Regional differences in the geometry of glomerular arterioles are also likely to predispose MBF to be less sensitive than CBF to any given vasoconstrictor stimulus. Failure of these mechanisms would promote reductions in MBF in response to physiological activation of the renal nerves, which could, in turn, lead to salt and water retention and hypertension.

Mechanisms underlying the antihypertensive functions of the renal medulla

There is good evidence that the renal medulla plays a pivotal role in long-term regulation of blood pressure. 'Renal medullary' blood pressure regulating systems have been postulated to involve both exocrine (pressure natriuresis/diuresis) and endocrine [renal medullary depressor hormone (RMDH)] functions. However, recent studies indicate that pressure diuresis/natriuresis dominates the antihypertensive renal response to increased renal perfusion pressure, suggesting little physiological role for a putative RMDH in compensatory responses to acutely increased blood pressure. The medullary circulation appears to play a key role in mediating pressure diuresis, although the precise mechanisms involved remain controversial. Counter-regulatory vasodilator mechanisms (e.g. nitric oxide), at least partly mediated through cross-talk between the vasculature and the tubular epithelium, protect the medullary circulation from the vasoconstrictor effects of hormonal factors such as angiotensin II. These mechanisms also appear to contribute to compensatory responses to increased salt intake in salt-resistant individuals. Failure of these mechanisms predisposes the organism towards the development of hypertension, appears to underlie the development of some forms of experimental hypertension, and may even contribute to the pathogenesis of essential hypertension.

Prostaglandins and nitric oxide in regional kidney blood flow responses to renal nerve stimulation

We examined the roles of cyclooxygenase products and of interactions between the cyclooxygenase and nitric oxide systems in the mechanisms underlying the relative insensitivity of medullary perfusion to renal nerve stimulation (RNS) in anaesthetized rabbits. To this end we examined the effects of ibuprofen and N(G)-nitro-L: -arginine (L-NNA), both alone and in combination, on the responses of regional kidney perfusion to RNS. Under control conditions, RNS produced frequency-dependent reductions in total renal blood flow (RBF; -82+/-3% at 6 Hz), cortical laser-Doppler flux (CLDF; -84+/-4% at 6 Hz) and, to a lesser extent, medullary laser-Doppler flux (MLDF; -46+/-7% at 6 Hz). Ibuprofen did not affect these responses significantly, suggesting that cyclooxygenase products have little net role in modulating renal vascular responses to RNS. L-NNA enhanced RBF (P=0.002), CLDF (P=0.03) and MLDF (P=0.03) responses to RNS. As we have shown previously, this effect of L-NNA was particularly prominent for MLDF at RNS frequencies < or = 1.5 Hz. Subsequent administration of ibuprofen, in L-NNA-pretreated rabbits, did not affect responses to RNS significantly. We conclude that counter-regulatory actions of NO, but not of prostaglandins, partly underlie the relative insensitivity of medullary perfusion to renal nerve activation.

α-Adrenoceptor subtypes mediating regional kidney blood flow responses to renal nerve stimulation

The mechanisms underlying the relative insensitivity of the renal medullary circulation to renal sympathetic nerve stimulation (RNS) remain unknown. Therefore, we tested the effects of systemic alpha(1)- and alpha(2)-adrenoceptor blockade on responses to electrical RNS in pentobarbitone anaesthetized rabbits. Renal blood flow (RBF), cortical laser Doppler flux (CLDF), and to a lesser extent medullary LDF (MLDF) were reduced by RNS in a frequency-dependent manner. Prazosin decreased responses of RBF and CLDF, but not MLDF, to RNS. For example, during the control period 4 Hz stimulation reduced RBF, CLDF and MLDF by 85+/-3%, 89+/-2%, and 20+/-12%, respectively, but after prazosin, corresponding responses were 39+/-3%, 42+/-5% and 28+/-7%, respectively. Prazosin markedly blunted pressor and renal vasoconstrictor responses to intravenous phenylephrine, without altering pressor responses to intravenous xylazine. Rauwolscine enhanced renal vasoconstrictor responses to RNS, although this was statistically significant for RBF and CLDF but not MLDF. For example, during the control period 2 Hz stimulation reduced RBF, CLDF and MLDF by 63+/-7%, 58+/-7%, and 29+/-17%, respectively, and after rauwolscine, corresponding responses were 83+/-4%, 87+/-1%, and 53+/-12%, respectively. Rauwolscine markedly blunted renal vasoconstrictor responses to renal arterial guanabenz, but not phenylephrine. These data suggest that alpha(1)-adrenoceptors contribute to RNS-induced vasoconstriction in the renal cortex, but contribute less in vascular elements controlling medullary perfusion. Activation of alpha(2)-adrenoceptors appears to blunt RNS-induced renal vasoconstriction, but this mechanism does not underlie the relative insensitivity of medullary perfusion to RNS.

Importance of the renal medullary circulation in the control of sodium excretion and blood pressure

The control of renal medullary perfusion and the impact of alterations in medullary blood flow on renal function have been topics of research interest for almost four decades. Many studies have examined the vascular architecture of the renal medulla, the factors that regulate renal medullary blood flow, and the influence of medullary perfusion on sodium and water excretion and arterial pressure. Despite these studies, there are still a number of important unanswered questions in regard to the control of medullary perfusion and the influence of medullary blood flow on renal excretory function and blood pressure. This review will first address the vascular architecture of the renal medulla and the potential mechanisms whereby medullary perfusion may be regulated. The known extrarenal and local systems that influence the medullary vasculature will then be summarized. Finally, this review will present an overview of the evidence supporting the concept that selective changes in medullary perfusion can have a potent influence on sodium and water excretion with a long-term influence on arterial blood pressure regulation.

Regional responsiveness of renal perfusion to activation of the renal nerves

We tested for regional differences in perfusion responses, within the renal medulla and cortex, to renal nerve stimulation in pentobarbital sodium-anesthetized rabbits. Laser-Doppler flux (LDF) was monitored at various depths below the cortical surface (1-15 mm). Basal cortical LDF (1-3 mm, approximately 200-450 U) was greater than medullary LDF (5-15 mm, approximately 70-160 U), but there were no statistically significant differences in basal LDF within these regions. The background LDF signal during aortic occlusion was similar in the cortex (2 mm, 31 U) and outer medulla (7 mm, 31 U), but slightly greater in the inner medulla (12 mm, 44 U). During electrical stimulation of the renal nerves (0.5-8 Hz), cortical LDF and total renal blood flow were similarly progressively reduced with increasing stimulus frequency. Medullary LDF (measured between 5 and 15 mm) was overall less responsive than cortical LDF. For example, 4-Hz stimulation reduced inner medullary LDF (9 mm) by 19 +/- 6% but reduced cortical LDF (1 mm) by 54 +/- 11%. However, medullary LDF responses to nerve stimulation were similar at all depths measured. Our results indicate that while the vascular elements controlling medullary perfusion are less sensitive to the effects of electrical stimulation of the renal nerves than are those controlling cortical perfusion, sensitivity within these vascular territories appears to be relatively homogeneous.

Early effects of renal denervation in the anaesthetised rat: natriuresis and increased cortical blood flow

A novel method of renal denervation was developed based on electro-coagulation of tissue containing most of the sympathetic fibres travelling towards the kidney. Kidney tissue noradrenaline was decreased to 4.7 % of the content measured in the contralateral innervated kidney when studied 3 days postdenervation. The method was utilised in anaesthetised rats to examine the effects of denervation within the heretofore unexplored first 75 min period postdenervation. Sodium excretion (UNaV) increased significantly (+82 %, P < 0.03) over the 25-50 min after denervation. In a parallel group, with a lower baseline UNaV, there was also a significant increase in UNaV (+54 %, P < 0.03) within the first 25 min. The renal perfusion pressure was maintained at a constant value and the glomerular filtration rate did not change after denervation. Renal cortical and medullary blood flows (CBF, MBF) were estimated as laser Doppler flux and medullary tissue ion concentration was estimated as electrical admittance (Y). Following denervation, in both groups CBF increased significantly within the first 25 min (+12 %, P < 0.01 and +8 %, P < 0.05, respectively) while MBF did not change or decreased slightly; Y did not change. The data document the development of natriuresis within the first 25-50 min after denervation. The increase in CBF indicated that, prior to denervation, the cortical, but not medullary, circulation was under a tonic vasoconstrictor influence of the renal nerves. Such a dissociation of neural effects on the renal cortical vs. medullary vasculature has not been previously described.

Differential control of intrarenal blood flow during reflex increases in sympathetic nerve activity

The role of renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) in the physiological regulation of medullary blood flow (MBF) remains ill defined, yet regulation of MBF may be crucial to long-term arterial pressure regulation. To investigate the effects of reflex increases in RSNA on intrarenal blood flow distribution, we exposed pentobarbital sodium-anesthetized, artificially ventilated rabbits (n = 7) to progressive hypoxia while recording RSNA, cortical blood flow (CBF), and MBF using laser-Doppler flowmetry. Another group of animals with denervated kidneys (n = 6) underwent the same protocol. Progressive hypoxia (from room air to 16, 14, 12, and 10% inspired O(2)) significantly reduced arterial oxygen partial pressure (from 99 +/- 3 to 65 +/- 2, 51 +/- 2, 41 +/- 1, and 39 +/- 2 mmHg, respectively) and significantly increased RSNA (by 8 +/- 3, 44 +/- 25, 62 +/- 21, and 76 +/- 37%, respectively, compared with room air) without affecting mean arterial pressure. There were significant reductions in CBF (by 2 +/- 1, 5 +/- 2, 11 +/- 3, and 14 +/- 2%, respectively) in intact but not denervated rabbits. MBF was unaffected by hypoxia in either group. Thus moderate reflex increases in RSNA cause renal cortical vasoconstriction, but not at vascular sites regulating MBF.

Differential neural control of intrarenal blood flow

To test whether renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) can differentially regulate blood flow in the renal medulla (MBF) and cortex (CBF) of pentobarbital sodium-anesthetized rabbits, we electrically stimulated the renal nerves while recording total renal blood flow (RBF), CBF, and MBF. Three stimulation sequences were applied 1) varying amplitude (0.5-8 V), 2) varying frequency (0.5-8 Hz), and 3) a modulated sinusoidal pattern of varying frequency (0. 04-0.72 Hz). Increasing amplitude or frequency of stimulation progressively decreased all flow variables. RBF and CBF responded similarly, but MBF responded less. For example, 0.5-V stimulation decreased CBF by 20 +/- 9%, but MBF fell by only 4 +/- 6%. The amplitude of oscillations in all flow variables was progressively reduced as the frequency of sinusoidal stimulation was increased. An increased amplitude of oscillation was observed at 0.12 and 0.32 Hz in MBF and to a lesser extent RBF, but not CBF. MBF therefore appears to be less sensitive than CBF to the magnitude of RSNA, but it is more able to respond to these higher frequencies of neural stimulation.

Modelling the neural control of intrarenal blood flow

1. The aim of the present study was to produce a mathematical model that describes the way dynamic changes in renal sympathetic nerve activity affect renal, cortical and medullary blood flow. 2. Cortical blood flow (CBF) and medullary blood flow (MBF) were measured using laser-Doppler flowmetry and (total) renal blood flow (RBF) was measured by transit-time flowmetry in six pentobarbitone-anaesthetized rabbits. The renal nerves were stimulated with rectangular pulses of 2 msec width and constant voltage at frequencies of 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 3 Hz. 3. An exponential function with two parameters was applied; steady state gain and a dynamic constant for the blood flow reduction with stimulation. The steady state gain coefficients were similar for RBF and CBF, but significantly less for MBF. The time taken to reach minimum flow was less for MBF than for RBF and CBF. 4. The model parameters indicate that there is differential neural control of CBF and MBF.

Pharmacological stimulation of arterial chemoreceptors in conscious rats produces differential responses in renal cortical and medullary blood flow

1. There have been no previously published data regarding intrarenal blood flow distribution in acute whole-body hypoxic hypoxia and/or arterial chemoreceptor stimulation in normoxic mammals. 2. Cortical and medullary blood flows were measured simultaneously before and in response to pharmacological stimulation of peripheral arterial chemoreceptors by i.v. injection of almitrine bismesylate (0.25 mg/kg). 3. Arterial chemoreceptor excitation reduced cortical blood flow but only in innervated kidneys. An effect on medullary blood flow was observed in neither innervated nor denervated kidneys. 4. These data indicate that renal cortical and medullary blood flows react differently to arterial chemoreceptor stimulation.

Intrarenal blood flow: microvascular anatomy and the regulation of medullary perfusion

1. The microcirculation of the kidney is arranged in a manner that facilitates separation of blood flow to the cortex, outer medulla and inner medulla. 2. Resistance vessels in the renal vascular circuit include arcuate and interlobular arteries, glomerular afferent and efferent arterioles and descending vasa recta. 3. Vasoactive hormones that regulate smooth muscle cells of the renal circulation can originate outside the kidney (e.g. vasopressin), can be generated from nearby regions within the kidney (e.g. kinins, endothelins, adenosine) or they can be synthesized by adjacent endothelial cells (e.g. nitric oxide, prostacyclin, endothelins). 4. Vasoactive hormones released into the renal inner medullary microcirculation may be trapped by countercurrent exchange to act upon descending vasa recta within outer medullary vascular bundles. 5. Countercurrent blood flow within the renal medulla creates a hypoxic environment. Relative control of inner versus outer medullary blood flow may play a role to abrogate the hypoxia that arises from O2 consumption by the thick ascending limb of Henle. 6. Cortical blood flow is autoregulated. In contrast, the extent of autoregulation of medullary blood flow appears to be influenced by the volume status of the animal. Lack of medullary autoregulation during volume expansion may be part of fundamental processes that regulate salt and water excretion.

Renal medullary blood flow and renal medullary antihypertensive mechanisms

It has long been recognised that the kidneys take part in blood pressure control via both their exocrine and endocrine functions. An endocrine antihypertensive function of the renal medulla has been proposed. The renal medullary depressor substances ("medullipins"), are released in response to increased renal perfusion pressure. It has been suggested that the release of "medullipin" is controlled via changes in renal medullary blood flow. Recent observations also suggest that renal medullary blood flow is involved in the control of the pressure/natriuretic-diuretic action of the kidney. In this review we outline a unified hypothesis for blood pressure control via a combination of the plasma volume regulating pressure-natriuresis mechanism and the powerful antihypertensive actions of the "medullipins" (i.e. vasodilatation, inhibition of sympathetic drive and a diuretic action). It is hypothesised that the activity of both these systems are under control by renal medullary blood flow.

Neural control of renal function

The renal nerves are the communication link between the central nervous system and the kidney. In response to multiple peripheral and central inputs, efferent renal sympathetic nerve activity is altered so as to convey information to the major structural and functional components of the kidney, the vessels, glomeruli, and tubules, each of which is innervated. At the level of each of these individual components, information transfer occurs via interaction of the neurotransmitter released at the sympathetic nerve terminal-neuroeffector junction with specific postjunctional receptors coupled to defined intracellular signaling and effector systems. In response to normal physiological stimuli, changes in efferent renal sympathetic nerve activity contribute importantly to homeostatic regulation of renal blood flow, glomerular filtration rate, renal tubular epithelial cell solute and water transport, and hormonal release. Afferent input from sensory receptors located in the kidney participates in this reflex control system via renorenal reflexes that enable total renal function to be self-regulated and balanced between the two kidneys. In pathophysiological conditions, abnormal regulation of efferent renal sympathetic nerve activity contributes significantly to the associated abnormalities of renal function which, in turn, are of importance in the pathogenesis of the disease.