Perioperative anaesthetic complications in healthy cats undergoing anaesthesia for neutering in first opinion practice

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to identify the incidence of common perioperative anaesthetic complications in cats undergoing anaesthesia for neutering in three UK first opinion practices.

METHODS

A retrospective anaesthetic record analysis was performed on cats anaesthetised for neutering at practices 1 and 2 between 9 December 2017 and 2 February 2021 and practice 3 between 9 March 2020 and 7 January 2021. A search of the practice management system identified all cats that had undergone neutering in the selected timeframe. Data from 1019 cats were included in the study. Information relating to patient characteristics and data from the anaesthesia session were extracted from electronic patient records and anaesthesia record charts and entered into an Excel spreadsheet. A definition of the complications was created after reviewing the literature and their incidence determined from the data set. Comparisons between different groups of cats in the study were made using a χ2 test for homogeneity or Fisher's exact tests to identify factors associated with increased incidence of complications.

RESULTS

The anaesthetic-related mortality was 1/1019 (0.10%). The most common complications were hypotension (22.6%), bradycardia (16.7%) and hypothermia (13.8%). Less common complications were hypocapnia (12.7%), hypercapnia (8.7%), tachycardia (6.6%), apnoea (3.1%), hyperthermia (1.7%), hypertension (1.4%), endotracheal tube obstruction (1.1%), hypoxia (0.3%), undesirable recovery (0.6%) and cardiac arrhythmia (0.2%). Factors associated with increased risk of hypotension were acepromazine pre-anaesthetic medication, higher maximum isoflurane dose, longer anaesthetic duration and lower body weight. Factors associated with increased risk of bradycardia were medetomidine pre-anaesthetic medication, longer anaesthetic duration and higher body weight. Factors associated with increased risk of hypothermia were higher maximum isoflurane dose, increased anaesthetic duration and lower body weight.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study showed that anaesthetic complications were frequently observed, with complications documented in 53.4% of the cats in the study. The information in this study may help to guide prioritisation of monitoring in feline anaesthesia.

Multicentered masked placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical study of an extended duration transdermal buprenorphine solution for post-operative pain in cats

A prospective, double masked, placebo-controlled, multicentered phase 3 clinical study was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of transdermal buprenorphine solution (TBS) for the control of post-operative pain in cats. A total of 228 cats from 12 US investigational sites met the enrollment criteria of which 107 placebo- and 112 TBS-treated cats were included into the per protocol efficacy analysis. The dose of TBS was 8 mg (0.4 ml) to cats 1.2 to 3 kilograms and 20 mg (1 ml) to cats >3 to 7.5 kilograms applied topically to the dorsal unclipped cervical skin 1-2 h prior to the undergoing elective surgical reproductive sterilization in conjunction with forelimb onychectomy. Interactive pain assessments and physiological variables were quantified through 96 h following recovery from anesthesia, and rescue analgesia was administered any time that pain control was scored inadequate. Cats requiring rescue analgesia or experiencing an adverse event suspected to be treatment related were considered treatment failures. Sixty-five and 23 cats were considered treatment failures in the placebo and TBS groups, respectively, with most occurring on the day of surgery. The treatment success rates were 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.28-0.53]) and 0.81 (95% CI: [0.70-0.89]) in the placebo and TBS groups, respectively, and the difference was significant (p < .05). Adverse events occurred at a similar frequency and were not clinically meaningful in either treatment group. The post-operative body temperatures over the duration of the study were on average 0.35 (95% CI: [0.20-0.50]) °C higher than baseline in TBS-treated cats and were not clinically meaningful, an observation typical of opioids in cats. These results serve as substantial evidence that TBS is safe and effective for the control of orthopedic and soft tissue post-operative pain in cats when a single topical dose is applied 1-2 h prior to surgery.

Feline procedural sedation and analgesia: When, why and how

PRACTICAL RELEVANCE

Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) describes the process of depressing a patient's conscious state to perform unpleasant, minimally invasive procedures, and is part of the daily routine in feline medicine. Maintaining cardiopulmonary stability is critical while peforming PSA.

CLINICAL CHALLENGES

Decision-making with respect to drug choice and dosage regimen, taking into consideration the cat's health status, behavior, any concomitant diseases and the need for analgesia, represents an everyday challenge in feline practice. While PSA is commonly perceived to be an uneventful procedure, complications may arise, especially when cats that were meant to be sedated are actually anesthetized.

AIMS

This clinical article reviews key aspects of PSA in cats while exploring the literature and discussing complications and risk factors. Recommendations are given for patient assessment and preparation, clinical monitoring and fasting protocols, and there is discussion of how PSA protocols may change blood results and diagnostic tests. An overview of, and rationale for, building a PSA protocol, and the advantages and disadvantages of different classes of sedatives and anesthetics, is presented in a clinical context. Finally, injectable drug protocols are reported, supported by an evidence-based approach and clinical experience.

Comparison of the effects of buprenorphine and methadone in combination with medetomidine followed by intramuscular alfaxalone for anaesthesia of cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the quality of anaesthesia and analgesia between methadone and buprenorphine in combination with medetomidine after induction with intramuscular (IM) alfaxalone in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

METHODS

Fifty-one female cats (American Society of Anesthesiologists status I-II), with a median age of 12 months (range 2-60 months), weighing a mean ± SD of 2.5 ± 0.5 kg, were recruited to the study. Cats were randomly allocated to receive medetomidine (600 µg/m2) and buprenorphine (180 µg/m2) (group MB) or medetomidine (500 µg/m2) and methadone (5 mg/m2) (group MM) IM. Anaesthesia was induced 15 mins later using alfaxalone (3 mg/kg) IM. Anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. All cats received meloxicam preoperatively. Quality of premedication and induction and intraoperative physiological parameters were recorded. Atipamezole (50% of medetomidine dose) was administered at the end of surgery. Cats were assessed postoperatively by the same blinded observer using a simple descriptive scale, numeric rating scale, dynamic interactive visual analogue scale (DIVAS) and UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scales, at 10, 20 and 30 mins post-extubation. Parametric and non-parametric data were compared using Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U-tests, respectively.

RESULTS

Forty-one cats completed the study. No significant differences were detected between groups before or during anaesthesia. No cats required rescue analgesia. DIVAS scores at 10 mins were significantly less in the MM group compared with the MB. No differences between groups at any other time points were detected using the four metrology instruments.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Both protocols provided good anaesthesia conditions for ovariohysterectomy in the cat.

Effect of premedication with butorphanol or methadone on ease of endoscopic duodenal intubation in dogs

OBJECTIVE

The effect of premedication with butorphanol or methadone on ease of endoscopic duodenal intubation.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial.

ANIMALS

A group of 20 client-owned dogs.

METHODS

Dogs were assigned randomly to be administered intravenous (IV) premedication with either butorphanol (0.4 mg kg^-1) or methadone (0.3 mg kg^-1). General anaesthesia was induced with propofol to effect and maintained with isoflurane in 100% oxygen. Sedation score 20 minutes after premedication administration and induction dose of propofol were recorded. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, haemoglobin oxygen saturation, respiratory rate and end-tidal isoflurane concentration were recorded every 5 minutes. Spontaneous lower oesophageal and pyloric sphincter opening, presence of gastro-oesophageal and duodeno-gastric reflux, antral peristaltic contractions and response to endoscopy were recorded as yes or no. Ease of duodenal intubation (EDI) was graded on a scale ranging from 1 (immediate entry with minimal manoeuvring required) to 4 (no entry after 2 minutes). Time (seconds) from the start of pyloric intubation to successfully entering the duodenum was recorded.

RESULTS

Median EDI score [3 ± 1 (butorphanol), 4 ± 1 (methadone), p = 0.035], time [65 ± 36 seconds (butorphanol), 120 ± 38 seconds (methadone), p = 0.028] and number of dogs with spontaneous pyloric sphincter opening [7/10 (butorphanol), 2/10 (methadone), p = 0.035] differed between groups. No other significant differences were found.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In these clinical cases, duodenal intubation was performed with greater ease, shorter time and more frequent spontaneous opening of the pyloric sphincter after premedication with butorphanol in comparison to methadone. The use of butorphanol facilitated the passage of the endoscope and is therefore recommended for premedication prior to upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy.

The safety of high-dose buprenorphine administered subcutaneously in cats

The safety of a proprietary formulation of buprenorphine hydrochloride administered subcutaneously (SC) to young cats was investigated in a blinded, randomized study. Four cohorts of eight cats aged approximately 4 months were administered saline, 0.24, 0.72 or 1.20 mg/kg/day buprenorphine SC for nine consecutive days, representing 0×, 1×, 3× and 5× of the intended dose. Cats were monitored daily for evidence of clinical reactions, food and water intake and adverse events (AEs). Physical examinations, clinical pathology, vital signs and electrocardiograms (ECGs) were evaluated at protocol-specified time points. Complete necropsy and histopathologic examinations were performed following humane euthanasia. Four buprenorphine-treated cats experienced AEs during the study, two unrelated and two related to study drug administration. The two cats with AEs considered related to drug administration had clinical signs of hyperactivity, difficulty in handling, disorientation, agitation and dilated pupils in one 0.24 mg/kg/day cat and one 0.72 mg/kg/day cat. All of these clinical signs were observed simultaneously. There were no drug-related effects on survival, injection response, injection site inspections, body weight, food or water consumption, bleeding time, urinalysis, respiration rate, heart rate, ECGs, blood pressures, body temperatures, macroscopic examinations or organ weights. Once daily buprenorphine s.c. injections at doses of 0.24, 0.72 and 1.20 mg/kg/day for 9 consecutive days were well tolerated in young domestic cats.

Clinical evaluation of alfaxalone to induce and maintain anaesthesia in cats undergoing neutering procedures

This study looked at the use and efficacy of alfaxalone for total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) in cats. Following intramuscular medetomidine (20 μg/kg) and morphine (0.3 mg/kg) premedication, anaesthesia was induced and maintained with intravenous alfaxalone. Patients were breathing 100% oxygen. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), end-tidal carbon dioxide, oxygen saturation of haemoglobin and indirect arterial blood pressure via Doppler (DAP) were recorded every 5 mins. Thirty-four cats (10 males and 24 females), between the age of 6 and 18 months, and weighing between 1.8 and 5.3 kg, and undergoing neutering procedures were included in this study. The results are presented as median (min, max) values. The time to first spontaneous movement (TS) was >30 mins in 19 cats, of which 12 received atipamezole for reversal of the effects of medetomidine. The TS was 53 (43, 130) mins in these 12 cats and 50 (40, 72) mins in the other seven cats. The body temperature in those 19 cats was significantly lower than the other cats (P = 0.05). The alfaxalone induction dose and maintenance infusion rate were1.7 (0.7, 3.0) mg/kg and 0.18 (0.06, 0.25) mg/kg/min, respectively. The HR, RR and DAP were 145 (68, 235) beats/min, 17 (5, 40) breaths/min and 110 (58, 210) mmHg, respectively. Apnoea was not observed in any cat. In conclusion, alfaxalone TIVA in combination with medetomidine and morphine premedication was effective in feral and domestic cats for the performance of neutering surgery; low body temperature might have resulted in longer recoveries in some cats.