On the excitation of action potentials by protons and its potential implications for cholinergic transmission

One of the most conserved mechanisms for transmission of a nerve pulse across a synapse relies on acetylcholine (ACh). Ever since the Nobel Prize-winning works of Dale and Loewi, it has been assumed that ACh-subsequent to its action on a postsynaptic cell-is split into inactive by-products by acetylcholinesterase (AChE). Herein, the widespread assumption of inactivity of ACh's hydrolysis products is falsified. Excitable cells (Chara braunii internodes), which had previously been unresponsive to ACh, became ACh-sensitive in the presence of AChE. The latter was evidenced by a striking difference in cell membrane depolarization upon exposure to 10 mM intact ACh (∆V = -2 ± 5 mV) and its hydrolysate (∆V = 81 ± 19 mV), respectively, for 60 s. This pronounced depolarization, which also triggered action potentials, was clearly attributed to one of the hydrolysis products: acetic acid (∆V = 87 ± 9 mV at pH 4.0; choline ineffective in the range 1-10 mM). In agreement with our findings, numerous studies in the literature have reported that acids excite gels, lipid membranes, plant cells, erythrocytes, as well as neurons. Whether excitation of the postsynaptic cell in a cholinergic synapse is due to protons or due to intact ACh is a most fundamental question that has not been addressed so far.

Carbamylcholine and acetylcholine-sensitive, cation-selective ionophore as part of the purified acetylcholine receptor

Black lipid membranes were formed with oxidized cholesterol in the presence of either the acetylcholine receptor, purified from the electric organ of the electric ray Torpedo californica or its tryptic digest. In both cases, conductance of cations increased and was dependent on the concentration of the receptor protein. Conductance of Ca++ was dependent on the concentration, but addition of carbamylcholine gave no reproducible of consistent effects. Only in the case of the tryptic digest of the acetylcholine receptor did carbamylcholine and acetylcholine consistently induce monovalent cation selective conductance (PNa,K: PCl=4.4). The induced monovalent cationic conductance due to carbamylcholine (10 muM) varied from 10- to over 100-fold. Curare (10muM) prevented the action of carbamylcholine. Na-dodecyl sulfate gel electrophoresis of the acetylcholine receptor, before and after tryptic digestion, indicated that this mild enzyme treatment hydrolyzed the receptor molecule subunits. Nevertheless, the receptor molecule retained its full binding of [acetyl(-3)H]acetylcholine; and analytical gel electrophoresis indicated that it remained intact possibly through hydrogen, hydrophobic and disulfice bonding.

Acetylcholine receptors

The idea that certain drugs and neurotransmitters produce their effects by combining with specific receptors was first clearly expressed by Langley (1905) on the basis of the selective and localized effect of nicotine on striated muscle fibres. In 1914, Langley published a paper in which the antagonism between ‘curari’ and nicotine was analysed and measured as the ratio by which the nicotine concentration had to be increased in order to produce a standard response in the presence of tubocurarine. It was clear that Langley had in mind the idea of competition between nicotine and curare for the receptor sites and it was surprising that he did not formulatethe theory quantitatively, particularly since Hill, working in Langley's laboratory in 1909, published a mathematical analysis of the action of nicotine on frog muscle giving kinetic and equilibrium equations based on the law of mass action, which could easily have been extended to give an account of competitive antagonism. Barger & Dale (1910) did not favour the idea of specific receptors for sympathomimetic amines.

Conductance changes produced by acetylcholine in lipidic membranes containing a proteolipid from Electrophorus

Ultrathin lipidic membranes containing one ten-thousandth of a special proteolipid from electric organ of Electrophorus reacted to the addition of acetylcholine by a rapid and transient increase in conductance. Such a change was not induced by choline and is greatly reduced by a previous application of d-tubocurarine. These properties, resembling those from chemically excitable membranes, were not observed with another proteolipid from the same tissue.