Synchronisation of oestrus and reproductive performance of dairy cows following administration of oestradiol benzoate or gonadotrophin releasing hormone during a synchronised pro-oestrus

Reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows and heifers resynchronized for a second insemination with an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device for 7 or 8d with estradiol benzoate injected at the time of device insertion and 24h after removal

One aim of this study was to compare the reproductive performance of cows and heifers when resynchronizing returns to estrus for a second insemination by treating with an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (IVD) for 7 or 8d when estradiol benzoate (EB) was administered at the start of treatment and again 24h after device removal. An additional aim was to document the pattern of onset and characteristics of estrus with each resynchrony treatment. Lactating cows in three herds were synchronized for a first estrus and AI by treatment with an IVD for 8d, starting on Day 0, cloprostenol (0.5 mg im) at device removal and EB at device insertion (2.0 mg im) and 24h after removal (1.0 mg im). Cows were resynchronized for a second estrus starting on Day 23 by reinsertion of IVDs for 7 (IVD-7-EB; n=449) or 8d (IVD-8-EB; n=445) with EB (1.0 mg im) administered at device insertion and 24h after removal. Cows were resynchronized for a third estrus by administration of EB (1.0 mg im) on Day 46, but subsequent treatments (no further treatment, reinsertion of CIDR or administration of EB on Day 55) varied among herds as part of separate studies. Maiden heifers (7-Day, n=68; 8-Day, n=69) were similarly treated as cows in a separate herd, but doses of EB were always 1.0 mg im at device insertion and 0.75 mg im 24h after removal. Heifers were not resynchronized for a third estrus. Cattle were inseminated on detection of estrus at each synchronized estrus. Cumulative pregnancy rates 4 week (66.0%, 276/418 versus 59.1%, 247/418) and 7 week (72.7%, 304/418 versus 67.7%, 283/418) after the start of AI were greater (P<0.05) in the IVD-7-EB cows compared to the IVD-8-EB cows, respectively; this was associated with a 9% increase in conception rates at the second estrus (P=0.051) in the IVD-7-EB cows. Treatment did not significantly affect reproductive performance in heifers. Characteristics of estrus measured with radiotelemetry did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups, but more cows were detected in estrus 36 h after removal of IVDs in the IVD-8-EB cows compared to the IVD-7-EB cows (P<0.05). We concluded that reproductive performance in resynchronized dairy cows but not heifers was greater following resynchronization of estrous cycles after AI with an IVD for 7 compared to 8d when EB was injected at the start of treatment and 24h after device removal.

Manipulation and control of the estrous cycle in pasture-based dairy cows

Treatments designed to synchronize luteolysis, preovulatory follicular development, and ovulation, and resynchronize estrus after a first AI have improved responses to synchronization treatments. Protocols based only on the use of PGF result in variable onset of estrus. Concentrations of progesterone prior to administering PGF have affected submission rates and fertility while administration of estradiol benzoate (EB) after inducing luteolysis has improved the synchrony of estrus and ovulation in some studies. In pasture-based dairy cows, GnRH-based protocols have generally resulted in one-third of both anestrous and cycling cows conceiving following synchronization of ovulation and timed AI. Protocols which use intravaginal progesterone releasing inserts (IVP4) are effective in inducing estrus in over 90% of treated dairy cows. Resynchronization of estrus after reinsertion of an IVP4 also improves the synchrony of returns to estrus, but pregnancy rates to the first AI have been reduced in some studies, and submission rates at a resynchronized estrus are less than at the first synchronized estrus. Administration of EB can be used to synchronize follicle wave emergence in resynchronized cows with intervals to new wave emergence comparable to that in cows synchronized for a first AI, but plasma concentrations of progesterone following treatment may be reduced. Synchronization of estrus and ovulation can be enhanced by administration of EB or GnRH during proestrus, but dose, timing and stage of follicular development at the time of treatment can affect outcomes.

Effect of artificial insemination on submission rates of lactating dairy cows synchronised and resynchronised with intravaginal progesterone releasing devices and oestradiol benzoate

This study investigated the hypothesis that a reduction in submission rates at a resynchronised oestrus is not due to the resynchrony treatment involving intravaginal progesterone releasing devices (IVDs) and oestradiol benzoate (ODB) but is associated with artificial insemination (AI) at the first synchronised oestrus. In Experiment 1, cows were synchronised for first oestrus with IVDs, with ODB administered at the time of device insertion (Day 0, 2 mg IM) and 24 h after removal (Day 9, 1 mg IM) and PGF(2alpha) injected at the time of device removal. Cows were then either inseminated (I) for 4 days or not inseminated (NI) following detection of oestrus (first round of AI). Every animal was resynchronised for a second round of AI by reinsertion of IVDs on Day 23 with administration of ODB (1 mg IM) at the time of insertion as well as 24 h after removal (Day 32). Cows detected in oestrus and inseminated for 4 days at the second round of AI were resynchronised for a third round by repeating the resynchrony treatment starting on Day 46 and inseminating cows on detection of oestrus for 4 days. In Experiment 2 the same oestrous synchronisation and resynchronisation treatments were used, but the timing of treatments differed. The cows had their cycles either presynchronised (treatment start Day -23) without AI and then resynchronised, starting on Day 0, for the first round of AI for AI at detected oestrus for 4 days, or they were synchronised (treatment start Day 0) for the first round of AI. In Experiment 1, 91.4% (64/70) and 92.6% (63/68) (P = 0.79) of cows in the I and NI treatments, respectively, were detected in oestrus after the initial synchronisation. At the second round of AI, submission rates for insemination were lower in the I group compared to the NI cows (74.5%, 35/47 versus 92.6%, 63/68, respectively; P = 0.007). Pregnancy rates (proportion treated that were classified as becoming pregnant) in I and NI cows 4 weeks (61.4%, 43/70 versus 63.2%, 43/68) and 7 weeks (77.1%, 54/70 versus 69.1%, 47/68) after the AI start date (AISD) did not differ significantly between treatments. In Experiment 2, presynchronisation and then resynchronisation of oestrous cycles before the first round of AI did not affect oestrous detection rates at the first round of AI (100%, 44/44 versus 98.0%, 50/51; P = 0.54), or pregnancy rates 1 week (63.6%, 28/44 versus 60.8%, 31/51; P = 0.70), 4 weeks (72.7%, 32/44 versus 76.5%, 39/51; P = 0.76) and 7 weeks (81.8%, 36/44 versus 88.2%, 45/51; P = 0.40) after AISD compared to cows that had their cycles synchronised for the first round of AI. These findings support our hypothesis that a reduction in submission rates at a resynchronised oestrus is associated with AI at the first synchronised oestrus and not due to a resynchrony treatment involving IVDs and ODB. This study supports the concept that early embryonic loss following AI at a synchronised oestrus could cause a reduction in submission rates following resynchronisation of oestrus, although investigation of the effect of passing an AI catheter or semen components were not studied per se.

Comparison of two estrus synchronization and resynchronization treatments in lactating dairy cows

Reproductive performance in cows following synchronization of estrus with intravaginal progesterone releasing devices (IVD) has varied with the length of treatment, cyclic status and prolonged return to estrus intervals in some cows following first AI. The objective of this study was to compare two methods of synchronizing and resynchronizing estrus on the reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows. Cows were treated with an IVD (Day 0) for 7 days (n = 350) or 8 days (n = 350), cloprostenol (0.5 mg i.m.) at the time of device removal and estradiol benzoate (EB) at the time of device insertion (1.5mg i.m.), and again 9 days later (1.0 mg i.m.). Cows were also resynchronized starting on Days 23 and 46 by reinsertion of IVDs for either 7 or 8 days and treatment with EB (1mg i.m.) at the time of device insertion and again 9 days later. Cows were inseminated on detection of estrus for 4 days after removal of devices at each of the synchronized estrous cycles. No significant differences in reproductive performance were detected between each treatment throughout the study period. Synchrony of estrus was more precise at the first and second estrus after treatment with an IVD for 8 days compared to 7 days. Cows classified as anestrous had lower reproductive performance than cows classified as cycling and had longer intervals to estrus at the second (P < 0.001) and third estrus (P < 0.06), but not at the first estrus (P = 0.09). Mean time to onset of estrus after IVD removal was less in cows treated with an IVD for 8 days compared to 7 days at each synchronized estrus (P < 0.01). More Holstein-Friesian cows were classified as non-pregnant and not detected in estrus than crossbreed cows (15.7%, 54/343 versus 9.0%, 24/266; [P < 0.05). The results of the study suggested that the main effects of the treatments that were used to synchronize and resynchronize estrus were to alter the timing and synchrony of estrus without affecting fertility.

Comparison of two doses of oestradiol benzoate administered at a resynchronised oestrus on reproductive performance of dairy cows

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of two doses of oestradiol benzoate (ODB) administered as part of a treatment designed to resynchronise returns to oestrus on the reproductive performance of cows in a controlled breeding program.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

PROCEDURE

Lactating dairy cows on two farms were treated to synchronise three successive oestrous cycles. An intravaginal progesterone releasing insert (IVP4) was used to synchronise the first oestrous cycle. The cows were then treated 15 days after the first treatment by reinsertion of an IVP4 that had been used to synchronise the first oestrus and administration of 1.0 mg of oestradiol benzoate (ODB) i.m. at device insertion. The IVP4 device was removed 8 days later and either 0.5 (n = 421) or 1.0 mg of ODB (n = 446) was administered 24 h later. Injections of (ODB) with or without the use of an IVP4 were used to synchronise the third oestrous cycle. Different synchronisation treatments were used to synchronise first and third oestrous cycles but differences were included in statistical models to account for variation in the data. This enabled examination of effects due to differences in the dose of ODB used to synchronise the second synchronised oestrus.

RESULTS

The dose of ODB (0.5 or 1.0 mg) administered just before the second synchronised oestrus did not significantly (P > 0.10) affect the cumulative pregnancy rates over three successive rounds of artificial insemination, the mating start date to the conception intervals, the conception rates to the first or second insemination, the proportion of cows submitted for insemination at the second synchronised oestrus or the proportion of cows that were not pregnant yet failed to show signs of oestrous (phantom cows) identified within each herd.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in reproductive performance between cows receiving either 0.5 mg or 1.0 mg ODB after removal of used IVP4 devices that had been inserted to resynchronise them for a second insemination.

Ovarian follicular development in Holstein cows following synchronisation of oestrus with oestradiol benzoate and an intravaginal progesterone releasing insert for 5–9 days and duration of the oestrous cycle and concentrations of progesterone following ovulation

The aim of this study was to determine if the duration of treatment with an intravaginal progesterone releasing insert (IVP(4)) after treatment with oestradiol benzoate (ODB) at the time of insertion and 24 h after removal would affect selected variables including: size of ovarian follicles at the time of removal of inserts, diameter of ovulatory follicles, plasma concentrations of progesterone following ovulation, and duration of the following oestrous cycle. Characteristics of oestrus at a synchronised and spontaneous oestrus were also monitored. Non-lactating Holstein cows were synchronised with an IVP(4) for 5 (n = 10), 7 (n = 10), 8 (n = 9) or 9 (n = 9) days together with injections of ODB at device insertion (2 mg) and 24 h after removal (1 mg). Ultrasonography showed no significant effect of treatment on the day of emergence of preovulatory follicles relative to the day of removal of inserts (overall mean = -4.22 +/- 0.58; P = 0.15) for cows that ovulated within 120 h insert removal (n = 36). Treatment with ODB and an IVP(4) for 5 days reduced the diameter of preovulatory follicles at the time of removal of inserts and for the following 2 days compared to cows treated for 7-9 days (mean difference 2.56 +/- 1.15 mm; P = 0.033) but did not reduce the diameter of the ovulatory follicle (P = 0.21). Day of emergence relative to removal of inserts was associated with the diameter of the ovulatory follicle (R2 = 0.69; P < 0.001). Concentrations of progesterone and the diameter of the corpus luteum following ovulation were not affected by treatment (P > 0.20), but were affected by the diameter of the ovulatory follicle (P < 0.01). Diameter of the ovulatory follicle did not affect interoestrous and interovulatory intervals (P > 0.40). We conclude that treatment with an IVP(4) for 5 compared to 7-9 days with ODB administered at device insertion, and 24 h after removal reduced the diameter of preovulatory follicles at the time of removal of the insert but did not reduce the diameter of the ovulatory follicle or concentrations of progesterone in plasma. Emergence of preovulatory follicles closer to the time of removal of inserts reduced the diameter of the ovulatory follicle when oestrus was induced with ODB. Ovulation of smaller follicles reduced concentrations of progesterone in plasma following ovulation but did not affect oestrous cycle duration.

Associations between the manipulation of patterns of follicular development and fertility in cattle

The wave-like patterns of ovarian follicular development in cattle can be manipulated by shortening the luteal phase with prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF), lengthening the period of follicle dominance with progesterone or curtailing follicle development with GnRH or oestradiol as 17beta, benzoate or cypionate. These hormones can also be used to synchronise ovulation allowing timed inseminations without detected oestrus. Progesterone, PGF, GnRH and oestradiol benzoate have each been used to increase conception rates in some situations, but their use has reduced them in others. For example, inseminations made within 96 h of a single injection of PGF administered during the luteal phase were associated with increased conception rates in dairy cows whereas double injection protocols reduced conception rates. The three forms of oestradiol and GnRH have greater effects on follicular development following divergence and dominance than following wave emergence. This can mean that follicles of differing maturity will be present about 7 days later and can result in varied intervals to the onset of oestrus following a PGF injection. The consequent variation in ovulation time can be reduced by injecting GnRH or an oestradiol during pro-oestrus. This means that some less mature follicles will ovulate, forming corpus luteum (CL) associated with a slower rise in plasma progesterone and lower mid-luteal concentrations. The lower conception rates recorded with single timed inseminations with synchronised ovulations have been associated with increased prevalences of short cycles in lactating dairy cows (with GnRH), with long luteal phases in cows and heifers (with oestradiol benzoate) and with embryo loss following positive pregnancy diagnosis (as with Ovsynch in lactating Holstein cows). Extensive Canadian studies have demonstrated that these same hormones can be successfully used without these limitations and reliably obtaining conception rates over 50% and up to 70% in beef cattle that have been supplemented with a progestin during the period of ovarian follicle synchronisation. The inherently lower fertility of Holstein cows during early lactation may be contributing to the reduced effectiveness of hormonal treatments for synchronised follicle development and ovulation. The role of reduced dose rates of GnRH in compromising this effectiveness needs to be determined if the potential of these treatments realised with beef cattle is to be achieved with lactating Holstein cows.

Comparison of four methods for detection of oestrus in dairy cows with resynchronised oestrous cycles

OBJECTIVE

To compare the sensitivity and positive predictive value of four methods for detection of oestrus in dairy cows with resynchronised oestrous cycles.

PROCEDURE

Oestrous cycles in cows in three herds were synchronised for a first round of artificial insemination (AI) and then resynchronised for a second round of AI. Sensitivity and positive predictive value of four aids (pedometers, radiotelemetric transmitters [HeatWatch; HW], tail-paint and heatmount detectors) that were used to detect the resynchronised oestrus were compared. Milk progesterone concentration and pregnancy testing at 12 weeks were used as the reference standard for cows being in oestrus.

RESULTS

The mean sensitivity and positive predictive value for detecting the resynchronised oestrus, for each aid that was used, was > 80%. Tail-paint was significantly more sensitive at detecting oestrus compared to heatmount detectors (P = 0.002), but not significantly more sensitive than pedometers (P = 0.07) or HW (P = 0.55) for detecting oestrus (91.3, 85.7; 81.4 and 88.4%, respectively). Positive predictive value of HW for detecting oestrus was greater than tail-paint (P = 0.014) and heatmount detectors (P = 0.024) but not pedometers (P = 0.25; 100, 91.7, 92.9 and 87.5%, respectively). Positive predictive value of heatmount detectors was greater than pedometers in herd C (93.4% vs 73.3%; P = 0.035) but not in herds A (95.0% vs 90.0%; P = 0.56) or B (90.8% vs 100%; P = 0.10). No other significant differences in sensitivity or positive predictive value of detection of oestrus were found between aids.

CONCLUSION

Tail-paint, heatmount detectors, pedometers and HW provide a high sensitivity (> 80%) and positive predictive value (> 85%) of detecting oestrus in dairy cows with resynchronized oestrous cycles.

Role of the sensitivity of detection of oestrus in the submission rate of cows treated to resynchronise oestrus

OBJECTIVE

To determine if failure to detect oestrus in cows treated to resynchronise oestrus leads to fewer cows being inseminated than are truly in oestrus.

PROCEDURE

Cows in three herds were enrolled in a controlled breeding program that involved synchronisation of oestrus for a first round of artificial insemination (AI) followed by resynchronisation for a second round of AI. Just before oestrus was expected at the second round of AI, aids for the detection of oestrus were fitted, which included pedometers, radiotelemetric transmitters (HeatWatch), tail-paint and heatmount detectors. Milk samples were collected at the second round of AI (day 33, herds A and B; day 35, herd C of the treatment program) and were used in combination with pregnancy testing to determine the number of cows that were in oestrus (milk progesterone < 2.0 ng/mL) and cows that were not in oestrus (milk progesterone > 2.0 ng/mL or pregnant at second round of AI) at the time samples were collected.

RESULTS

The mean sensitivity of detection of oestrus at the resynchronised oestrus was 92.5% and did not differ significantly between herds (P = 0.19). A total of 75% (60/80) of cows that were retrospectively determined to be not pregnant at the time of the second round of AI were classified as having high (> or = 2.0 ng/mL) concentrations of progesterone in milk at that time. Pregnancy testing of cows about 35 days after AI suggested that early pregnancy loss also contributed to a reduction in submission rates at the resynchronised oestrus.

CONCLUSION

Failure to submit cows for insemination at a resynchronised oestrus was mainly due to cows not being in oestrus rather than due to a failure to detect oestrus.

Characteristics of oestrus measured using visual observation and radiotelemetry

The aim of this study was to measure the level of agreement between characteristics of oestrus measured using visual observation and radiotelemetry. Oestrous cycles in 20 non-lactating Holstein cows were synchronised by treatment with an intravaginal progesterone releasing inserts and injections of oestradiol benzoate for a first oestrus (Round 1) and then re-synchronised for two subsequent and successive oestrous cycles (Rounds 2 and 3). Cows were ovariectomised following the third synchronised oestrus and then retreated to induce oestrus (Round 4). Oestrus was monitored by continuous visual observation and radiotelemetry between 24 and at least 60 h after removal of inserts at Rounds 1-4. Significant differences (P<0.001) were obtained between the mean number of mounts (42.7 versus 17.8), duration of oestrus (14.4h versus 10.9h), total duration of mounts (223.9s versus 33.1s), mean duration per mount (5.6s versus 1.9s), the number of mounts per hour (3.5 versus 2.0) and the interval to oestrus (41.2h versus 42.8h) between values determined by visual observation compared with radiotelemetry, respectively. The 95% limits of agreement for all the characteristics of oestrus measured were wide although the efficiency of detection of oestrus for both methods of recording oestrus were high (97.5% (78/80) versus 93.8% (75/80), for visual observation and radiotelemetry, respectively; P=0.25). We conclude that there is poor agreement between characteristics of oestrus measured with visual observation and radiotelemetry in Holstein cows following monitoring of synchronised oestrous cycles, although both methods were equally efficient for the detection of oestrus.