Technologies involved in molecular blood group genotyping

Blood group genotyping in alloimmunized multi-transfused thalassemia patients from Iran

Objectives

Serological methods may not be reliable for RBC antigen typing, especially in multi‐transfused patients. The blood group systems provoking the most severe transfusion reactions are mainly Rh, Kell, Kidd, and Duffy. We intended to determine the genotype of these blood group system antigens among Iranian alloimmunized thalassemia patients using molecular methods and compare the results with serological phenotyping.

Methods

Two hundred patients participated in this study. Blood group phenotype and genotype were determined using the serological method and PCR‐SSP, respectively. The genotypes of patients with incompatibility between phenotype and genotype were re‐evaluated by RFLP‐PCR and confirmed by DNA sequencing.

Results

Discrepancies between phenotype and genotype results were found in 132 alleles and 83 (41.5%) patients; however, there was complete accordance between the three genotyping methods. Most discrepancies were detected in Rh and Duffy systems with 47 and 45 cases, respectively, and the main discrepancy was in the FY*B/FY*B allele when serologically showed Fy(a+b+). All 39 undetermined phenotypes, due to mixed‐field reactions, were resolved by molecular genotyping.

Conclusion

Molecular genotyping is more reliable compared with the serological method, especially in multi‐transfused patients. Therefore, the addition of blood group genotyping to serological assays can lead to an antigen‐matched transfusion in these patients.

Genotyping analysis of the MNS blood group system of thalassemia patients with alloantibodies in Iran

BACKGROUND

Serological methods are unreliable for accurate determination of blood group antigens in multi-transfused thalassemia patients. The MNS blood group system has five high-frequency antigens. Many studies demonstrated that some antibodies including anti-S, anti-s, and anti-U may cause acute and delayed transfusion reactions and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. This study aimed to determine the genotype of the MNS blood group in thalassemia patients with alloantibodies by molecular methods.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this study, 104 blood samples from thalassemia patients were collected. The blood group phenotype for M, N, S and s antigens was determined by the tube hemagglutination method. MNS blood group genotyping was performed using PCR-SSP and DNA Sequencing methods.

RESULTS

All patients were genotyped with a total of 6 pairs of primers. Discrepancies between genotype and phenotype were observed in 22 patients with S/s alleles and 2 patients with M/N alleles, however, there was full accordance between the results of SSP-PCR and DNA sequencing. The frequency of MNS blood group alleles was determined as follows: 25 % MNSs, 23 % MNss, 21 % MMSs, 9% MMSS, 9% MMss, 8% NNss, 2%MNSS, and NNSS, NNSs, MM genotypes at 1% each.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, molecular genotyping is more reliable than serological methods in multiple transfusion patients and can lead to a more compatible blood unit for transfusion in these patients.

Genomic analyses of KEL alleles in alloimmunized thalassemia patients from Iran

OBJECTIVES

Serological methods are unreliable for red blood cells (RBCs) antigen typing in multi-transfused thalassemia patients due to the presence of donor RBCs in the recipient's circulation and interfering antibodies. Kell blood group system is important in transfusion medicine and Kell antibodies have shown as the most prevalent antibodies in thalassemia patients. We intended to determine the genotype of Kell antigens among Iranian alloimmunized thalassemia patients using molecular methods and compare the results with serological phenotyping.

METHODS

Two hundred thalassemia patients participated in this study. Blood group phenotype was performed by the serological method, while the genotype was determined for KEL*01, KEL*02, KEL*03, and KEL*04 alleles using PCR-Sequence Specific Primer (PCR-SSP) method. The genotypes of patients with incompatibility between phenotype and genotype were re-evaluated by Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism-PCR (RFLP-PCR) and confirmed by DNA sequencing in all cases.

RESULTS

Ten patients were found with discrepancies between genotype and phenotype; however, there was a complete agreement between the results of SSP-PCR, RFLP-PCR, and DNA sequencing. Six discrepancies were found in the KEL*01/KEL*02 allele when serologically phenotyped as K-k+. One patient with K-k- and three patients with Kpa-Kpb + phenotype were identified as KEL*01/KEL*02 and KEL*03/KEL*04, respectively.

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that molecular genotyping is more reliable compared with the serological method, especially in the patients who have received multiple transfusions. Therefore, using a combination of these techniques can lead to a better matched transfusion in these patients.

The screening of rare blood donors in a highly admixed population: A new approach for Holley and Diego genotyping and impact of genomic and self-reported ancestry

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to develop strategies for genotyping DO*HY (Dombrock system) and DI*A/DI*B (Diego system) alleles and to evaluate the impact of genomic and self-declared ancestry on rare donor screening in admixed populations.

BACKGROUND

The antigens Hy and Di^b demonstrate clinical importance. The lack of antisera for the serological evaluation of these antigens makes it necessary to develop molecular methods. In addition, considering that some rare red blood cell phenotypes present differences in frequency between ethnic groups, it is important to assess the applicability of self-declared ancestry in the search for rare donors in admixed populations.

METHODS

DO*HY and DI*A/DI*B genotyping based on real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was standardised. A total of 457 blood donors clustered by self-defined skin colour/race categories were genotyped. Furthermore, individual genomic ancestry was used in the analyses.

RESULTS

The assays developed are reproducible and provide satisfactory results even at low concentrations of DNA, which make them useful in situations where the DNA is scarce, such as dried blood spots on filter paper, or when screening for pooled samples. No significant difference was observed in the frequencies of the DI*A, DI*B and DO*HY, comparing the self-declared White (branco) donors with those who are Black (preto) and Brown (pardo).

CONCLUSION

Real-time PCR, especially using pooled samples, is a promising strategy to screen rare blood donors. Although both self-reported race/colour and some blood group phenotypes are associated with ancestry, the results point to a greater complexity in the application of self-declared race/colour in the screening of rare donors in admixed populations.

Discrepancies between red cell phenotyping and genotyping in daily immunohematology laboratory practice

False-positive and false-negative reactions exist for serological and molecular antigen typing methods. If the predicted phenotype is inconsistent with the patient`s known antibodies or serological phenotype, the discrepancy must be investigated. False-negative and false-positive results are clinically problematic in blood donors and patients. In this study, we investigated discrepant results between serology and molecular testing in patients and blood donors that occurred in daily molecular laboratory practice over a two year-period. SCD patients represented a large percentage of our cases of discrepancies but we also observed a high prevalence of discrepancies between phenotypes and genotypes in blood donors. The main reasons that led to discrepancies were recent transfusions and limitations of phenotyping. Discrepancies classified as false positive phenotype/true negative genotype and false negative phenotype/true positive genotype occurred mainly in patients with recent transfusions and individuals with RH variants while those classified as true negative phenotype/false positive genotype involved null phenotypes due to silent genes. Despite the limitations of molecular methods currently employed, we found more false-negative and false-positive phenotypes than genotypes demonstrating that genotyping is more efficient to define the blood types, especially in transfusion dependent patients.

Molecular Pathology in Transfusion Medicine: New Concepts and Applications

Virtually all the red blood cell and platelet antigen systems have been characterized at the molecular level. Highly reliable methods for red blood cell and platelet antigen genotyping are now available. Genotyping is a useful adjunct to traditional serology and can help resolve complex serologic problems. Although red blood cell and platelet phenotypes can be inferred from genotype, knowledge of the molecular basis is essential for accurate assignment. Genotyping of blood donors is an effective method of identifying antigen-negative and/or particularly rare donors. Cell-free DNA analysis provides a promising noninvasive method of assessing fetal genotypes of blood group alloantigens.

Serological weak D phenotypes: a review and guidance for interpreting the RhD blood type using the RHD genotype

Approximately 0·2-1% of routine RhD blood typings result in a "serological weak D phenotype." For more than 50 years, serological weak D phenotypes have been managed by policies to protect RhD-negative women of child-bearing potential from exposure to weak D antigens. Typically, blood donors with a serological weak D phenotype have been managed as RhD-positive, in contrast to transfusion recipients and pregnant women, who have been managed as RhD-negative. Most serological weak D phenotypes in Caucasians express molecularly defined weak D types 1, 2 or 3 and can be managed safely as RhD-positive, eliminating unnecessary injections of Rh immune globulin and conserving limited supplies of RhD-negative RBCs. If laboratories in the UK, Ireland and other European countries validated the use of potent anti-D reagents to result in weak D types 1, 2 and 3 typing initially as RhD-positive, such laboratory results would not require further testing. When serological weak D phenotypes are detected, laboratories should complete RhD testing by determining RHD genotypes (internally or by referral). Individuals with a serological weak D phenotype should be managed as RhD-positive or RhD-negative, according to their RHD genotype.

Considerations of red blood cell molecular testing in transfusion medicine

The field of transfusion medicine is on the threshold of a paradigm shift, as the technology for genotyping of red blood cell antigens, including US FDA-approved arrays, is now moving into standard practice. Access to cost-efficient, high-resolution genotyping has the potential to increase the quality of care by decreasing the risk for alloimmunization and incompatible transfusions in individuals on long-term blood transfusion protocols, including patient groups with hemoglobinopathies and other chronic diseases. Current and future applications of molecular methods in transfusion medicine and blood banking are discussed, with emphasis on indications for genotyping in various clinical scenarios. Furthermore, limitations of the current gold standard methodology and serology, as well as of contemporary molecular methodology, are examined.

Molecular pathology in transfusion medicine

This article provides an overview of the application of molecular diagnostic methods to red cell and platelet compatibility testing. The advantages and limitations of molecular methods are evaluated compared with traditional serologic methods. The molecular bases of clinically significant red cell and platelet antigens are presented. Current recommendations for reporting molecular assay results and distinctions between genotype and phenotype are discussed.