Pupil size: The Beijing Eye Study

Assessment of Pupil Size and Angle Kappa in Refractive Surgery: A Population-Based Epidemiological Study in Predominantly American Caucasians

Purpose This retrospective study aims to establish normative values for pupil size, angle kappa, higher-order aberration, and astigmatism type in a largely Caucasian population in Utah, United States, utilizing the NIDEK OPD-Scan III system (Gamagori, Japan). Methods This study included 716 patients (1432 eyes) grouped based on spherical equivalence and age. Measurements were conducted under mesopic and photopic conditions. Statistical analysis involved Pearson's correlation and linear regression using the generalized estimating equation. NIDEK OPD-Scan III measured mesopic and photopic pupil size and angle kappa. The subjects were then grouped based on their spherical equivalence in diopters (D) and age in decades. The spherical equivalence groups were defined: >-6 D, -5.99 to -3 D, -2.99 to -0.25 D, -0.24 to 0.24 D, and >0.25 D (range 0.25-5.75 D). The higher-order aberration groups were based on the reason for the visit: laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, photorefractive keratectomy, and small incision lenticule extraction as one group; cataract evaluation; and keratoconus. Astigmatism measurements were grouped into with-the-rule (WRT), against-the-rule (ATR), and oblique astigmatism, with further subgrouping into a young cohort (20-40 years) and an old cohort (>65 years).  Results Among 716 participants, 49.2% were men; the mean age was 42.1±15.5 (range 7-88 years). The average spherical equivalence for myopia eyes was -3.28±2.34 D, and 1.51±1.46 D for hyperopia eyes. The mean mesopic pupil size was 5.68 ± 1.09 mm; the photopic pupil size was 4.65±1.09 mm. Pearson's correlation coefficient for mesopic pupil size versus age was -0.551, and -0.42 for photopic pupil (p < 0.001); sphere vs mesopic pupil size was -0.200, and -0.173 for photopic pupil (p < 0.001). The regression analysis for mesopic pupil size versus age revealed a 0.39 mm decrease in average pupil size per decade increase in age, and 0.25 mm decrease per decade for photopic pupil. The regression analysis for mesopic pupil size versus sphere revealed a 0.22 mm decrease in average pupil size per 3D increase in sphere, and a 0.16 mm decrease 3 D increase in sphere for the photopic pupil. The mean mesopic angle kappa was 0.33 ± 0.15 mm; photopic angle kappa was 0.31±0.15 mm. Pearson's correlation coefficient for mesopic angle kappa vs spherical equivalence was 0.32, and 0.296 for photopic angle kappa (p <0.001 for both). Regression analysis for mesopic angle kappa vs spherical equivalence demonstrated a 0.051 mm increase in angle kappa per 3 D increase in spherical equivalence, and a 0.048 mm increase for photopic angle kappa (p < 0.001 for both). Among the higher-order aberration groups, the keratoconus group exhibited the highest levels. In terms of astigmatism type, WRT astigmatism was the most common in the young cohort, while ATR astigmatism was most prevalent in the older cohort. Conclusions The results of this study reveal significant associations between pupil size and increasing age, as well as between pupil size and increasingly positive refractive errors. These findings hold particular clinical relevance to older patients and individuals with hyperopia, as they undergo photoablative corneal refractive surgery or multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Understanding the established normative values for pupil size, angle kappa, higher-order aberration, and astigmatism type can aid clinicians in making more informed decisions and improving patient outcomes.

Pupillodynamics and corneal spherical aberrations in a set of Indian cataract patients and its implications for aberrometric customisation of intraocular lenses

Purpose:

Assessment of pupil diameter in various light conditions and the corresponding corneal spherical aberrations in a cohort of Indian eyes with bilateral senile cataracts and the possible use of this data in aberrometric customization of intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Methods:

In this prospective observational study done at a tertiary eye care centre in India, the selected patients were subjected to measurement of their pupil diameters in scotopic, mesopic, and photopic conditions as well as the corresponding corneal spherical aberrations, using the Sirius Topographer (Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici, Florence, Italy). Shapiro–Wilk test, Independent t-test, ANOVA with Bonferroni correction on post-hoc testing were used for statistical analysis.

Results:

104 eyes of 52 patients were enrolled for the study. The mean age was 53 ± 11.88 years. The mean scotopic, mesopic, and photopic pupil sizes were 4.37 mm (4.11–4.63 mm), 3.92 mm (3.71 mm–4.15 mm), and 3.37 mm (3.18–3.67 mm), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference (P = <0.001) in the mean corneal spherical aberration measured at the 6 mm zone (0.23 ± 0.02 microns) and at the 4 mm zone (0.06 ± 0.01 microns).

Conclusion:

The mean corneal spherical aberration corresponding to the average mesopic pupil size of our patient population was substantially lower than that of the scotopic pupil size and also less than the amount corrected by most of the negative aspheric IOLs. This perhaps indicates the need for customising IOLs based on the spherical aberrations of cornea at the zone corresponding to the mesopic pupil diameter for optimal residual total postoperative spherical aberrations.