Apicectomy of posterior teeth--a clinical study

Prevalence, Characteristics and Distribution of Odontogenic Cysts amongst the Indian Subpopulation of Southern Rajasthan: A 5-year Retrospective Study of 218 Cysts

BACKGROUND

Odontogenic cysts (OCs) arise from the odontogenic epithelium and occur in the tooth-bearing regions of the jaws. Proliferation and/or degeneration of this epithelium lead to OC development.

AIM AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence, characteristics, distribution and clinicopathological features of OCs and compare with other studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Records of OCs were retrieved, and patient's data, aetiology, clinical features, histopathological distribution, treatment, complications and recurrence were studied.

RESULTS

A total of 218 OCs were studied in 200 patients. The mean age of patients was 35.74 years. The overall sex ratio (male: female) was 1.22:1. Second, third and fourth decades of life were commonly affected. The majority of the patients (85%) reported with a complaint of pain (with or without swelling). Radicular cyst was the most prevalent type (49.55%). The most common site involved was the anterior maxilla (41.75%). Dental complications such as displacement, mobility, discoloration and root resorption were diagnosed in 91 cysts (41.75%). Bony complications such as expansion and perforation were present in 136 cysts (62.38%). Dentition was non-vital in 61.46% of cysts. The most common treatment method performed was combination surgery (enucleation with or without endodontic treatment/extraction and apicoectomy). Recurrence rate was 3.20%.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence, characteristics and distribution features of OCs in India are similar to those of studies conducted in other parts of the world. There is a broad spectrum of OCs, with some cysts having a propensity for certain age, gender and site, whereas a few cysts have distinct properties to recur and have aggressive and invasive behaviour.

Factors Affecting the Success of Endodontic Microsurgery: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study

The purpose of this retrospective study was to verify preoperative local parameters of periapical lesions evaluated on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans as a potential prognostic factor in endodontic microsurgery (EMS). Among 89 cases, local factors (dimensions of lesion, bone destruction pattern, presence/absence of cortical bone destruction, height of buccal bone plate, apical extend of root canal filling, presence/absence of communication with anatomical cavities, type of lesion restriction) were measured on preoperative CBCT images before EMS. At least one year after surgery, the outcome of EMS was classified as a success or a failure. Ten cases (11.24%) were classified as a failure and 79 as a success (88.76%). Symptomatic lesions (OR = 0.088 (95% CI 0.011-0.731); p = 0.024), apicomarginal lesions (OR = 0.092 (0.021-0.402); p = 0.001) and an association with molar teeth (OR = 0.153 (0.032-0.732); p = 0.019) were found as negative predictive factors in the univariate analysis, whereas large apicocoronal dimension (OR = 0.664 (0.477-0.926); p = 0.016), apicomarginal lesions (OR = 0.058 (0.006-0.55); p = 0.013), and an association with molar teeth (OR = 0.047 (0.003-0.869); p = 0.04) were identified as negative predictive factors in the multivariate analysis model. Symptomatic lesions, apicomarginal lesions, lesions associated with molar teeth and large apicocoronal dimensions are significantly associated with the failure of EMS.

Outcomes reporting in systematic reviews on surgical endodontics: A scoping review for the development of a core outcome set

BACKGROUND

Evidence-informed decision-making in healthcare relies on the translation of research results to everyday clinical practice. A fundamental requirement is that the validity of any healthcare intervention must be supported by the resultant favourable treatment outcome. Unfortunately, differences in study design and the outcome measures evaluated often make it challenging to synthesise the available research evidence required for secondary research analysis and guideline development. Core outcome sets (COS) are defined as an agreed standardised set of outcomes which should be measured and reported as a minimum in all clinical trials on a specific topic. The benefits of COS include less heterogeneity, a reduction in the risk of reporting bias, ensuring all trials contribute data to facilitate meta-analyses, and given the engagement of key stakeholders, it also increases the chances that clinically-relevant outcomes are identified. The recognition of the need for COS for assessing endodontic treatment outcomes lead to the development of Core Outcome Sets for Endodontic Treatment modalities (COSET) protocol, which is registered (No. 1879) on the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) website.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this scoping review are to: (1) identify the outcomes assessed in studies evaluating surgical endodontic procedures; (2) report on the method of assessment used to measure the outcomes; (3) and assess selective reporting bias in the included studies. The data obtained will be used to inform the development of COS for surgical endodontics.

METHODS

A structured literature search of electronic databases and the grey literature was conducted to identify systematic reviews on periradicular surgery (PS), intentional replantation (IR) and tooth/root resection (RR), published between January 1990 and December 2020. Two independent reviewers were involved in the literature selection, data extraction and the appraisal of the studies identified. The type of intervention, outcomes measured, type of outcomes reported (clinician- or patient-reported), outcome measurement method, and follow-up period, were recorded using a standardised form.

RESULTS

Twenty-six systematic reviews consisting of 19 studies for PS, three studies for IR and four studies for RR were selected for inclusion. Outcome measures identified for PS and IR included pain, swelling, mobility and tenderness, outcomes related to periodontal/soft tissue healing (including sinus tract), periradicular healing, tooth survival, life impact (including Oral-Health-Related-Quality-of-Life), resource use and/or adverse effects. For RR, in addition to tooth survival, endodontic complications, and adverse effects, the outcome measures were primarily periodontal-related, including pocket depth reduction, attachment gain, periodontal disease, and periodontic-endodontic lesions. The majority of outcome measures for PS, IR, and RR were assessed clinically, radiologically and/or via patient history. Specific tools such as rating scales (Visual Analog Scale, Verbal rating Scale, Numerical Rating Scale, and other scales) were used for the assessment of pain, swelling, and tenderness, and validated questionnaires were used for the assessment of oral health-related quality of life. The range of follow-up periods were variable, dependent on the outcome measure and the type of intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcome measures, method of assessment and follow-up periods for PS, IR and RR were identified and categorised to help standardise the reporting of outcomes for future research studies. Additional outcome measures that were not reported, but may be considered in the COSET consensus process include loss of root-end filling material, number of clinic visits, surgery-related dental anxiety and muco-gingival aesthetic-related measures, such as scarring, black triangles, root surface exposure, and tissue discolouration.

Microsurgical endodontic treatment of the upper molar teeth and their relationship with the maxillary sinus: a retrospective multicentric clinical study

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical and radiographic success rate of microsurgical endodontic treatment of upper molar teeth in relationship with the maxillary sinus, with 12 months follow-up.

METHODS

Patients treated with microsurgical endodontic treatment of upper molar teeth in the period between 2017 and 2019 were recruited from two dental clinics according to specific selection criteria. The outcomes were determined based on clinical and radiographic results taken three, six and 12 months post-operatively, compared with those taken immediately before and after surgery. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were recorded. The distance between the most apical part of the root and of the lesion to the maxillary sinus was measured on CBCT images before the surgery. Patient-related outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

Out of 35 patients evaluated, 21 were selected according with the selection criteria for a total of 27 roots and 29 canals treated. After 12 months, 18 patients showed a complete healing whereas three demonstrated incomplete healing. Consequently, the success rate in this study was 85.7% after one year. In 28.5% (6 patients) there was a perforation of the Schneiderian membrane that didn't seem to affect the outcome. All patients kept the molar one year later. The pain level decreased significantly over the time during the first week after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Microsurgical Endodontic treatment of the upper molar teeth should be considered a valid and predictable treatment option even in case of Schneiderian membrane perforation. Future clinical studies with a larger sample size are needed to compare the results obtained.

Outcomes of periradicular surgery of maxillary first molars using a vestibular approach: a prospective, clinical study with one year of follow-up

PURPOSE

The aim of the present prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical study was to compare the outcomes of periradicular surgery of the maxillary first molar tooth using the vestibular approach between 2 preoperative radiologic evaluation methods: cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and conventional radiography.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Periradicular surgery was applied to the maxillary first molar tooth in 40 patients. The patients were divided into 2 groups. The patients in group 1 underwent examination and preoperative planning with CBCT, and the patients in group 2 underwent examination and preoperative planning with conventional radiography. The outcomes of the treatment were evaluated radiographically and clinically, and the data were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was significantly shorter in group 1 than in group 2. According to the radiographic and clinical healing criteria used in the present study, the healing of patients in group 1 was rated as a success in 35%, an improvement in 40%, and a failure in 25%. In the group 2 patients, healing was rated as a success in 42.1%, an improvement in 31.6%, and a failure in 26.3%. Sinus membrane elevation was performed in 92.3% of all patients. Sinus membrane perforation occurred in 20% of the patients in group 1 and 36.8% of the patients in group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Periradicular surgery of maxillary first molars using a vestibular approach is a viable treatment method with a low complication rate. Preoperative CBCT examination demonstrated positive contributions to the treatment outcomes.

Outcome of endodontic surgery: a meta-analysis of the literature--Part 2: Comparison of endodontic microsurgical techniques with and without the use of higher magnification

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of root-end surgery. It identifies the effect of the surgical operating microscope or the endoscope on the prognosis of endodontic surgery. The specific outcomes of contemporary root-end surgery techniques with microinstruments but only loupes or no visualization aids (contemporary root-end surgery [CRS]) were compared with endodontic microsurgery using the same instruments and materials but with high-power magnification as provided by the surgical operating microscope or the endoscope (endodontic microsurgery [EMS]). The probabilities of success for a comparison of the 2 techniques were determined by means of a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. The influence of the tooth type on the outcome was investigated.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search for longitudinal studies on the outcome of root-end surgery was conducted. Three electronic databases (ie, Medline, Embase, and PubMed) were searched to identify human studies from 1966 up to October 2009 in 5 different languages (ie, English, French, German, Italian, and Spanish). Review articles and relevant articles were searched for cross-references. In addition, 5 dental and medical journals (ie, Journal of Endodontics, International Endodontic Journal, Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontics, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, and International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery) dating back to 1975 were hand searched. Following predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, all articles were screened by 3 independent reviewers (S.B.S., M.R.K., and F.C.S.). Relevant articles were obtained in full-text form, and raw data were extracted independently by each reviewer. After agreement among the reviewers, articles that qualified were assigned to group CRS. Articles belonging to group EMS had already been obtained for part 1 of this meta-analysis. Weighted pooled success rates and a relative risk assessment between CRS and EMS overall as well as for molars, premolars, and anteriors were calculated. A random-effects model was used for a comparison between the groups.

RESULTS

One hundred one articles were identified and obtained for final analysis. In total, 14 studies qualified according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 2 being represented in both groups (7 for CRS [n = 610] and 9 for EMS [n = 699]). Weighted pooled success rates calculated from extracted raw data showed an 88% positive outcome for CRS (95% confidence interval, 0.8455-0.9164) and 94% for EMS (95% confidence interval, 0.8889-0.9816). This difference was statistically significant (P < .0005). Relative risk ratio analysis showed that the probability of success for EMS was 1.07 times the probability of success for CRS. Seven studies provided information on the individual tooth type (4 for CRS [n = 457] and 3 for EMS [n = 222]). The difference in probability of success between the groups was statistically significant for molars (n = 193, P = .011). No significant difference was found for the premolar or anterior group (premolar [n = 169], P = .404; anterior [n = 277], P = .715).

CONCLUSIONS

The probability for success for EMS proved to be significantly greater than the probability for success for CRS, providing best available evidence on the influence of high-power magnification rendered by the dental operating microscope or the endoscope. Large-scale randomized clinical trials for statistically valid conclusions for current endodontic questions are needed to make informed decisions for clinical practice.

Levels of evidence for the outcome of endodontic surgery

The purpose of this investigation was twofold: (1) to search for clinical articles pertaining to success and failure of periapical surgery and (2) to assign levels of evidence to these studies except case reports. Electronic and manual searches were conducted to identify all the literature regarding success and failure of periapical surgery since 1970. Articles were reviewed, and each article was assigned to a level of evidence from 1 (highest level) to 5 (lowest level). This search located 79 clinical studies. Among these studies, there were no level of evidence-1 randomized clinical trial studies. Five of the seven level of evidence-2 randomized clinical trials compared postoperative pain between surgical and nonsurgical retreatment. Only two level of evidence-2 randomized clinical trials compared the outcomes of surgical treatment with that of nonsurgical treatment. The majority of frequently quoted "success and failure" studies were case series (level of evidence 4).

Survival of surgical endodontic treatment performed in a dental teaching hospital: a cohort study

AIM

To assess the survival function of surgical endodontic treatment performed at least 1 year before in a dental teaching hospital.

METHODOLOGY

A total of 194 teeth surgically treated between 1991 and 2001 were recalled and examined clinically and radiographically using a set of strict criteria. The Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test were used to evaluate the survival time. Confounding factors were examined by Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The median survival time of the 154 first-time surgically treated teeth was 92.1 months (95% CI: 40.9-143.4) and that of the 40 resurgery cases was 39.1 months (95% CI: 6.1-72.1) up to the date of recall. There was a significant difference in the length of survival between the two groups. For those first-time surgery cases, the preoperative marginal bone loss and the operator had a significant influence on the survival time (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The survival of surgical endodontic treatment declined nonlinearly with time. The preoperative marginal bone loss, operator and resurgery were important factors affecting the survival of this treatment modality.

Periradicular surgery of molars: a prospective clinical study with a one-year follow-up

AIM

The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the outcome of periradicular surgery of molars after one year.

METHODOLOGY

The material consisted of 25 molars with 39 roots demonstrating periradicular lesions of endodontic origin. Surgical treatment included root-end resection, root-end preparation with sonic microtips, and root-end filling with Super-EBA cement. At the one-year follow-up examination, healing was evaluated clinically and radiographically. Healing was assigned to three categories: (i) success (ii) improvement, and (iii) failure using well defined criteria.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight per cent of the surgically treated molars showed successful healing. In 8%, the healing was rated as improved and only 4% were failures.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of the present study and data of recently published studies show that periradicular surgery may result in a predictable treatment outcome in molars with persistent periradicular lesions.