Significance of renal biopsy in patients with presumed diabetic nephropathy

The role of kidney biopsy in deciphering diabetic versus non-diabetic origin of kidney disease among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and nephrotic range proteinuria: A retrospective study

Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is tightly associated with the increased prevalence of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Nonetheless, severe renal function impairment and/or nephrotic range-proteinuria could also result from non-diabetic renal disease (non-DRD) among patients with DM. The 'Gold standard' for the differential diagnosis between DKD and non-DRD is kidney biopsy, although no real consensus exists. Thus, this study intends to associate the clinical and biochemical profile of patients with DM and renal disease with the histopathological data of kidney biopsy.In addition, we aimed to evaluate the role of kidney biopsy, especially when other causes, other than DM, are highly suspected among patients with DM and kidney disease.

Methods

Thirty two patients with T2DM and nephrotic range levels of proteinuria or with co-existing factors pointing towards a non-diabetic origin of kidney disease were studied, retrospectively. All 32 patients underwent kidney biopsy and were classified according to histopathological findings into 3 groups: a) isolated diabetic kidney disease (DKD), b) non-diabetic kidney disease (NDKD) and c) mixed kidney disease (MKD).

Results

Fifteen out of the 32 patients had findings of an isolated DKD, while 17 out of 32 patients suffered from NDKD (13 patients) or MKD (4 patients). DKD patients were younger (p = 0.016) and had a higher HbA1c value (p = 0.069, borderline statistical significance), while the NDKD patients had significantly shorter disease duration (p = 0.04). Furthermore, the incidence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) was lower among the NDKD patients (p < 0.001), who had also significantly less interstitial fibrosis (p = 0.02). Finally, the presence of DR, higher levels of interstitial fibrosis and longer T2DM duration were recognized as factors, which were positively associated with DKD.

Conclusion

This study advocates the usefulness of kidney biopsy in patients with T2DM and nephrotic range levels of proteinuria, especially when DR is absent and shorter disease duration is observed.

The Diagnostic Performance of a Clinical Diagnosis of Diabetic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD), a common cause of CKD and kidney failure, is usually diagnosed clinically. However, there is little evidence comparing the performance of a clinical diagnosis to biopsy-proven diagnosis.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Diagnostic performance of a clinical diagnosis was determined in a group of patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease who underwent kidney biopsy after an initial clinical diagnosis.

METHODS

A data analysis of 54 patients who were part of a study cohort for a prospective analysis of cardiovascular and kidney outcomes and who had undergone kidney biopsy after an initial clinical diagnosis of DKD or non-DKD (NDKD) at enrolment was used. We determined the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of a clinical diagnosis of DKD.

RESULTS

A total of 37 of 43 patients clinically diagnosed with DKD also had biopsy-proven DKD, whilst only 1 of 11 patients who had clinically diagnosed NDKD had biopsy-proven DKD. Sensitivity was 97.4%, specificity was 62.5%, positive predictive value 86%, and negative predictive value 90.9%. Comparable values were obtained when analysis was restricted to those with primary rather than secondary diagnosis of DKD or when restricted to those with only DKD found at biopsy.

CONCLUSION

A clinical diagnosis of DKD has high sensitivity and is unlikely to overlook cases but may lead to overdiagnosis.

Kidney Biopsy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

Kidney biopsies (KBs) are performed in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) to diagnose non-diabetic or hypertensive kidney disease (NDHKD) potentially requiring specific management compared to diabetic and or hypertensive nephropathy (absence of NDHKD). Indications for KB are based on the presence of atypical features compared to the typical course of diabetic nephropathy. In this study, we assessed the association of different patterns of atypical features, or KB indications, with NDHKD.

METHODS

Native KBs performed in patients with T2D were analyzed. Data were collected from the patients' records. KB indications were determined according to the presence of different atypical features considered sequentially: (1) presence of any feature suggesting NDHKD which is not among the following ones, (2) recent onset of nephrotic syndrome, (3) low or rapidly declining estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), (4) rapid increase in proteinuria, (5) short duration of diabetes, (6) presence of hematuria, or (7) normal retinal examination.

RESULTS

Among the 463 KBs analyzed, NDHKD was diagnosed in 40% of the total population and 54, 40, 24, and 7% of the KBs performed for indications 1-4 respectively. Conversely, no patient who underwent KB for indications 5-7 displayed NDHKD. Logistic regression analyses identified eGFRCKD-EPI >15 mL/min/1.73 m2, urinary protein-to-Cr ratio <0.3 g/mmol, hematuria, HbA1c <7%, and diabetes duration <5 years as predictors of NDHKD, independently from the indication group.

CONCLUSION

NDHKD is frequent in T2D. Despite the association of hematuria with NDHKD, our results suggest that presence of hematuria and absence of DR are insufficient to indicate KB in the absence of concurrent atypical features. Conversely, rapid progression of proteinuria and rapid deterioration of eGFR are major signals of NDHKD.

Insights into the Role of Renal Biopsy in Patients with T2DM: A Literature Review of Global Renal Biopsy Results

INTRODUCTION

Renal biopsy performed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) for atypical or suspected diabetic kidney disease (DKD) reveals one of three possibilities: diabetic nephropathy (DN, pathological diagnosis of DKD), nondiabetic kidney disease (NDKD) and DN plus NDKD (mixed form). NDKD (including the mixed form) is increasingly being recognized worldwide. With the emerging concept of DKD and the complexity of routine application of renal biopsy, the identification of "clinical indicators" to differentiate DKD from NDKD has been an area of active research.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched for relevant articles mainly according to the keyword search method. We reviewed prevalence of the three types of DKD and different pathological lesions of NDKD. We also reviewed the clinical indicators used to identify DKD and NDKD.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 40 studies (5304 data) worldwide between 1977 and 2019 that looked at global renal biopsy and pathological NDKD lesions. The overall prevalence rate of DN, NDKD and DN plus NDKD is reported to be 41.3, 40.6 and 18.1%, respectively. In Asia, Africa (specifically Morocco and Tunisia) and Europe, the most common isolated NDKD pathological type is membranous nephropathy, representing 24.1, 15.1 and 22.6% of cases, respectively. In contrast, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis is reported to be the primary pathological type in North America (specifically the USA) and Oceania (specifically New Zealand), representing 22% and 63.9% of cases, respectively. Tubulointerstitial disease accounts for a high rate in the mixed group (21.7%), with acute interstitial nephritis being the most prevalent (9.3%), followed by acute tubular necrosis (9.0%). Regarding clinical indicators to differentiate DKD from NDKD, a total of 14 indicators were identified included in 42 studies. Among these, the most commonly studied indicators included diabetic retinopathy, duration of diabetes, proteinuria and hematuria. Regrettably, indicators with high sensitivity and specificity have not yet been identified.

CONCLUSION

To date, renal biopsy is still the gold standard to diagnose diabetes complicated with renal disease, especially when T2DM patients present atypical DKD symptoms (e.g. absence of diabetic retinopathy, shorter duration of diabetes, microscopic hematuria, sub-nephrotic range proteinuria, lower glycated hemoglobin, lower fasting blood glucose). We conclude that renal biopsy as early as possible is of great significance to enable personalized treatment to T2DM patients.

The Value of Renal Biopsy in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus in Singapore over the Past Two Decades

Objective

This study on the prevalence of diabetic nephropathy (DN) and coexistence of non-diabetic renal disease (NDRD) in a cohort of 255 non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients aims to determine the value of performing renal biopsies in these patients and elucidate the factors which could affect their progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

Methods

Among 255 NIDDM patients, 93 had DN alone, 69 had NDRD alone, and the remaining 93 had DN plus NDRD (mixed group). The indications for renal biopsy were based on clinical suspicion of superimposed NDRD, including heavy or rapidly increasing proteinuria, renal impairment even though diabetes is of relatively short duration, rapidly declining renal function, and presence of hematuria with dysmorphic red blood cells suggesting presence of glomerulonephritis.

Results

The following were predictors of ESRD: high systolic BP at biopsy, longer duration of diabetes, heavy proteinuria, and presence of diabetic retinopathy. Comparing patients in the NDRD group with the DN group and the mixed group, the NDRD group had lower serum creatinine and higher eGFR with lower urinary proteinuria and higher serum albumin at presentation and on follow-up. Kimmelstiel-Wilson nodules were associated with a poorer prognosis leading to a higher occurrence of ESRD among patients with DN.

Conclusion

Renal biopsy is of value in indicating the prognosis of NIDDM patients with DN based on the diabetic lesions. For NIDDM patients with atypical course and suspicion of associated NDRD, a renal biopsy would enable us to diagnose the underlying NDRD and offer appropriate therapy. Most nephrologists would consider renal biopsy for an NIDDM patient based on clinical indications like atypical clinical course and suspicion of an associated NDRD, but they would not perform a routine renal biopsy like for a CKD patient, unless it is for a research indication.

Timing of kidney biopsy in type 2 diabetic patients: a stepwise approach

BACKGROUND

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the most prevalent cause of renal disease in type 2 diabetic patients and is usually diagnosed clinically. A kidney biopsy is considered when non-diabetic renal disease (NDRD) is suspected, such as rapid progression in renal function impairment and severe proteinuria. Still, there is yet no consensus on the timing of kidney biopsy in type 2 diabetic patients. This study aims to identify markers that can help differentiate between DN and NDRD and guide the decision of kidney biopsy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with type 2 diabetes who received kidney biopsy from 2008 to 2017 at Taipei Veterans General Hospital. Ophthalmologist consultation and outpatient records, diagnosis of kidney biopsy, laboratory data, and clinical characteristics were collected.

RESULTS

This study enrolled 160 type 2 diabetic patients, among which 120 (75%) had isolated DN and 40 (25%) had NDRD ± DN (26 had isolated NDRD, and 14 had NDRD superimposed on DN). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, DM duration (odds ratio [OR]: 0.907; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.842-0.977; P = 0.01), diabetic retinopathy (OR: 0.196; 95% CI: 0.061-0.627; P = 0.006), and urinary RBC (OR: 1.068; 95% CI: 1.024-1.115; P = 0.002) were independent predictors of NDRD. In patients with diabetic retinopathy (n = 112, 70%), the presence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy, pan-retinal photocoagulation, and hematuria were factors predicting NDRD; and in patients without diabetic retinopathy (n = 48, 30%), short DM duration and hematuria were factors predicting NDRD.

CONCLUSIONS

Using diabetic retinopathy, DM duration, and hematuria, we developed a 3-step approach to stratify patients into three categories with the different likelihoods of having NDRD. Then different strategies could be taken accordingly. Our stepwise approach is easy to follow and may serve as an appropriate and useful tool to help clinicians in making decisions of kidney biopsy in type 2 DM patients presenting with kidney diseases.

A Clinicopathological Study of 267 Patients with Diabetic Kidney Disease Based on the Renal Pathology Society - 2010 Classification System

Introduction:

Renal biopsy is primarily indicated in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) with proteinuria, to diagnose non-diabetic renal disease (NDRD). However, Renal Pathology Society classification (RPSc) – 2010 has classified diabetic nephropathy (DN) into four classes of glomerular lesions with a separate scoring for tubulointerstitial and vascular lesions. Paucity of data from Indian subcontinent prompted us to plan this study to classify DN on biopsy as per the RPSc and correlate the clinical profile with histology.

Materials and Methods:

Patients with DM who underwent renal biopsy for various indications (between Aug 2013 and Nov 2015) were included in the study. DN on histology was classified according to RPSc. Histopathology lesions of DN were correlated with clinical and biochemical profiles.

Results:

Of the 267 patients studied, 252 (94.3%) were type 2 DM. NDRD alone was seen in 65 (24.34%), DN in 161 (60.3%), and NDRD with DN in 41 (15.3%). The most common indications for biopsy were rapidly progressive renal failure (76.7%) and nephrotic syndrome (16.4%). The most common glomerular class was class IV (43.5%), followed class III (41%), class II (13.3%), and class I (1.9%). The most common NDRD seen was acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) in 20.2% and is frequently associated with class III. Tubulointerstitial chronicity and not the arteriolar chronicity, was correlated with low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

Conclusions:

Most patients with DN subjected to renal biopsy were in class IV, and AIN was the most common NDRD. Only tubulointerstitial chronicity correlated with low eGFR.

[Kidney disease care for the elderly]

In our aging population, kidney disease management needs to take into account the frailty of the elderly. Standardized geriatric assessments can be proposed to help clinicians apprehend this dimension in their daily practice. These tools allow to better identify frail patients and offer them more personalized and harmless treatments. This article aims to focus on the kidney diseases commonly observed in elderly patients and analyze their specific nephrogeriatric care modalities. It should be noticed that all known kidney diseases can be also observed in the elderly, most often with a quite similar clinical presentation. This review is thus focused on the diseases most frequently and most specifically observed in elderly patients (except for monoclonal gammopathy associated nephropathies, out of the scope of this work), as well as the peculiarities of old age nephrological care.

CKD in diabetes: diabetic kidney disease versus nondiabetic kidney disease

The increasing global prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) has prompted research efforts to tackle the growing epidemic of diabetic kidney disease (DKD; also known as diabetic nephropathy). The limited success of much of this research might in part be due to the fact that not all patients diagnosed with DKD have renal dysfunction as a consequence of their diabetes mellitus. Patients who present with CKD and diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2) can have true DKD (wherein CKD is a direct consequence of their diabetes status), nondiabetic kidney disease (NDKD) coincident with diabetes mellitus, or a combination of both DKD and NDKD. Preclinical studies using models that more accurately mimic these three entities might improve the ability of animal models to predict clinical trial outcomes. Moreover, improved insights into the pathomechanisms that are shared by these entities - including sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) and renin-angiotensin system-driven glomerular hyperfiltration and tubular hyper-reabsorption - as well as those that are unique to individual entities might lead to the identification of new treatment targets. Acknowledging that the clinical entity of CKD plus diabetes mellitus encompasses NDKD as well as DKD could help solve some of the urgent unmet medical needs of patients affected by these conditions.

Diagnostic Performance of Retinopathy in the Detection of Diabetic Nephropathy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 45 Studies

AIMS

To conduct an evidence-based evaluation of diabetic retinopathy (DR) for the diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy (DN) in type 2 diabetics with kidney disease.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 27, 2018, including the reference lists of identified primary studies. A study was included if it (1) used DR as a diagnostic test for DN; and (2) used histological evaluation of renal tissues as the reference standard.

RESULTS

The analysis included 45 studies (4,561 patients). A bivariate analysis yielded a sensitivity of 0.67 (95% CI 0.61-0.74) and a specificity of 0.78 (95% CI 0.73-0.82). The summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis provided an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% CI 0.76-0.83). In a setting of 41% prevalence of DN, the probability of DN would be 68% if the test of DR was positive, and the probability of DN would be 23% if it was negative. In addition, although the mean specificity of proliferative DR for the detection of DN was 0.99 (95% CI 0.45-1.00), the mean sensitivity was 0.34 (95% CI 0.24-0.44), and the AUC was 0.58 (95% CI 0.53-0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

DR is helpful in diagnosing DN in persons with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease, but the severity of DR may not parallel the presence of DN.

Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Retinopathy for the Detection of Diabetic Kidney Disease in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to explore whether diabetic retinopathy (DR) could distinguish diabetic kidney disease (DKD) from nondiabetic renal diseases (NDRDs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and renal disease.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, MEDLINE and China National Knowledge Internet for articles that enrolled patients with DKD and NDRD. The results were summarized as sensitivity, specificity and the area under the curve of summary receiver operating characteristic curve with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 51 studies that included 4,990 participants were collected for evaluation. The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve with their 95% CIs were 0.67 (95% CI 0.61, 0.73), 0.77 (95% CI 0.72, 0.81) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.82), respectively. If the test for DR is negative, the probability of DKD would decrease to 10%, but if the test for DR is positive, the probability would increase only to 42%. In addition, although the mean specificity of proliferative DR for detection of DKD was 0.98 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.00), the mean sensitivity was 0.25 (95% CI 0.16, 0.35).

CONCLUSIONS

DR may lack adequate evidence either to verify DKD or to exclude NDRD, and the severity of DR may not parallel the presence of DKD.

Renal Histology in Diabetic Patients

Background:

The diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy is based on the course of clinical manifestations and renal biopsy. Renal biopsy is usually performed in patients with atypical presentations.

Objectives:

This study was performed to analyze various renal histopathological lesions in diabetic patients and to establish a clinicopathological correlation.

Materials and Methods:

In this retrospective study, the authors analyzed renal histology of 40 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who presented with atypical features of diabetic renal involvement and underwent renal biopsy at the Military Hospital Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco, between January 2008 and December 2016.

Results:

About 60% of the patients had isolated diabetic nephropathy, 35% had isolated nondiabetic renal diseases and 5% had both. Patients with nondiabetic renal diseases had significantly higher hematuria (P = 0.02), shorter duration of diabetes (P = 0.009), higher mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.04) and lower prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (P < 0.001). The most common histological lesion in patients with nondiabetic renal diseases was IgA nephropathy (25%). In patients with diabetic nephropathy, the most common histological class was Class III (42.3%). Furthermore, higher histological classes were associated with lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (P < 0.001) as well as higher prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (P = 0.009) and nephrotic proteinuria (P = 0.04).

Conclusions:

This study found that in Rabat, Morocco, the most common histopathological lesion in patients with diabetes was diabetic nephropathy. Hematuria, shorter duration of diabetes, higher mean estimated glomerular filtration rate and lower prevalence of diabetic retinopathy were reported among those with nondiabetic renal diseases. These findings are in accord with that of studies from other countries. However, large sample size and long-term follow-up clinical studies are needed to demonstrate the renal pathological implications and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with renal involvement.

Renal biopsy in patients with diabetes: a pooled meta-analysis of 48 studies

Background

The utility of renal biopsy in patients with diabetes is highly debated. Diabetics with rapidly worsening renal disease are often 'clinically' labelled as having diabetic nephropathy (DN), whereas, in many cases, they are rather developing a non-diabetic renal disease (NDRD) or mixed forms (DN + NDRD).

Methods

We performed a systematic search for studies on patients with diabetes with data on the frequency of DN, NDRD and mixed forms, and assessed the positive predictive values (PPVs) and odds ratios (ORs) for such diagnoses by meta-analysing single-study prevalence. Possible factors explaining heterogeneity among the different diagnoses were explored by meta-regression.

Results

In the 48 included studies ( n = 4876), the prevalence of DN, NDRD and mixed forms ranged from 6.5 to 94%, 3 to 82.9% and 4 to 45.5% of the overall diagnoses, respectively. IgA nephropathy was the most common NDRD (3-59%). PPVs for DN, NDRD and mixed forms were 50.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 44.7-55.2], 36.9% (95% CI: 32.3-41.8) and 19.7% (95% CI: 16.3-23.6), respectively. The PPV when combining NDRD and mixed forms was 49.2% (95% CI: 43.8-54.5). Meta-regression identified systolic pressure, HbA1c, diabetes duration and retinopathy as factors explaining heterogeneity for NDRD, creatinine and glomerular filtration rate for mixed forms and only serum creatinine for DN. ORs of DN versus NDRD and mixed forms were 1.71 (95% CI: 1.54-1.91) and 4.1 (95% CI: 3.43-4.80), respectively.

Conclusions

NDRD are highly prevalent in patients with diabetes. Clinical judgment alone can lead to wrong diagnoses and delay the establishment of adequate therapies. Risk stratification according to individual factors is needed for selecting patients who might benefit from biopsy.

Predicting non-diabetic renal disease in type 2 diabetic adults: The value of glycated hemoglobin

AIMS

The indications for renal biopsy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) are not well established. We investigated the prevalence, spectrum, and predictors of biopsy-proven non-diabetic renal disease (NDRD) in T2D.

METHODS

An observational, single-center, retrospective study of T2D adults who underwent renal biopsies (N = 51) over 10 years for nephrotic-range proteinuria, microscopic hematuria, or rapidly declining renal function.

RESULTS

Thirty-five (68.6%) biopsies were diagnostic of NDRD, and 16 (31.4%) revealed isolated diabetic nephropathy. The most common NDRDs were interstitial nephritis (20%), progressive crescentic glomerulonephritis (14%), membranous nephropathy (11%), and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (11%). The odds for NDRD declined by 97% in the presence of diabetic retinopathy (P < 0.001). The deterioration of HbA1c during the year before biopsy predicted NDRD even after adjusting for diabetic retinopathy (OR, 7.65; 95% CI, 1.36-123.04; P = 0.003). A model based on the interaction between the HbA1c values 12 months before biopsy and the absolute change in these values during the preceding year predicted NDRD with 73.7% sensitivity and 75% specificity (AUC, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated a considerably high prevalence of NDRD in T2D adults undergoing renal biopsy. The absence of diabetic retinopathy, lower HbA1c values 12 months before biopsy and greater deterioration in HbA1c prior to biopsy predicted NDRD in T2D. Further studies are needed to validate the findings.

Renal histology in diabetic nephropathy: A novel perspective

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease all over the world. India has a high incidence and prevalence of diabetes and >30% have nephropathy. Recently, a histological classification has been proposed. This study analyzed the renal histology in 114 diabetic patients with renal dysfunction. Nearly 75% of patients had DN. Fifty five (63.95%) were males. Mean duration of diabetes was 7.04 ± 4.9 years. Mean serum creatinine in study group was 5.2 ± 2.9 mg/dl, with mean estimated glomerular filtration rate of 23.43 ± 21.48 ml/min/1.732 m². Forty eight patients (55.81%) had diabetic retinopathy (DR); prevalence of DR was more in patients who had diabetes for > 10 years than patients who had diabetes for <6 years (P = 0.022). The most common histological class was Class IV observed in 37 (43.02. %) cases, Class III DN in 24 (27.90%) cases, Class IIa and Class IIb in 11 (12.79%) cases each and Class I DN in 3 (3.48%) cases. Higher histological class was associated with higher proteinuria, lower glomerular filtration rate (P < 0.001) and was more likely to be associated with retinopathy (P = 0.012) and hypertension (P = 0.0003) but did not correlate with duration of diabetes (P = 0.85). There was a poor correlation between retinopathy and DN. Biopsy helps to stage the renal lesions in diabetics with renal dysfunction.

Non-albuminuric renal disease among subjects with advanced stages of chronic kidney failure related to type 2 diabetes mellitus

Urinary albumin excretion has been consistently found to be normal in a significant number of subjects with early stages of diabetic kidney disease. This study was aimed to estimate the prevalence and characteristics of non-albuminuric chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus among subjects who reach advanced stages of renal failure. Study population was composed of incident patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min) related to type 2 diabetes in a tertiary hospital from Gran Canaria (Spain) during a period of 2 years. Subjects were classified as normoalbuminuric (urinary albumin-to-creatine ratio [UACR] <30 mg/g), microalbuminuric (UACR ≥30 and <300 mg/g), or proteinuric (UACR ≥300 mg/g). Of 78 eligible patients, 21.8% had normoalbuminuria, 20.5% had microalbuminuria, and 57.7% had proteinuria. Individuals with normoalbuminuria were mostly women and had a lower prevalence of smoking and polyneuropathy than subjects with microalbuminuria or proteinuria. They also presented greater measures of body mass index and waist circumference, higher values of total and LDL cholesterol, and lower values of HbA1c and serum creatinine than subjects with microalbuminuria or proteinuria. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that female sex (positively) and HbA1c and polyneuropathy (negatively) were independently associated with absence of albuminuria. In conclusion, around 20% of subjects with diabetes-related advanced chronic kidney disease, characteristically women, have normal urinary albumin excretion. HbA1c and polyneuropathy are inversely related to this non-albuminuric form of nephropathy.