Characterization of the analgesic effect of paracetamol and caffeine combinations in the pain-induced functional impairment model in the rat

N-acetylcysteine dose-dependently improves the analgesic effect of acetaminophen on the rat hot plate test

BACKGROUND

Acetaminophen (APAP) induced hepatotoxicity is a clinically important problem. Up to now, interventive therapy with n-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been considered as a gold-standard treatment for APAP overdose. However, no study has focused on the efficacy of these drugs' concurrent administration on probable enhancing therapeutic outcomes. Thus, this study was aimed to investigate the analgesic effect of co-administration of NAC and acetaminophen in male rats. The NAC-APAP drug formulation may demonstrate the stranger antinociceptive effect.

METHODS

Forty-eight male Sprague-Dawley rats (12-14 weeks) randomly divided into six equal groups; control, APAP (received 300 mg/kg APAP), NAC (received 600 mg/kg NAC) and APAP+ NAC groups that received simultaneously 300 mg/kg APAP with 200-600 mg/kg NAC (AN200, AN400, AN600). All administrations were done orally for once. The antinociceptive effect was recorded by measurement of latency period on a hot plate in 30, 60, and 90 min after administrations.

RESULTS

The results showed that NAC's concurrent administration with APAP, dose-dependently increased APAP analgesic effects (p< 0.0001). Moreover, NAC treatment exhibited an antinociceptive effect in 60 and 90 min, per se. The treatments had no adverse effect on liver enzymes and oxidative stress.

CONCLUSION

Co-administration of NAC with APAP can improve the antinociceptive effect of APAP. It is suggested that this compound can enhance analgesic effects of APAP and eventually lead to a reduction in acetaminophen dose. Further studies are needed to evaluate the molecular mechanism of this hyper analgesic effect.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of (S)-Ketoprofen Co-Administered with Caffeine: A Preclinical Study in Arthritic Rats

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether caffeine modifies the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of (S)-ketoprofen following oral administration in a gout-type pain model. 3.2 mg/kg of (S)-ketoprofen alone and combined with 17.8 mg/kg of caffeine were administered to Wistar rats and plasma levels were determined between 0.5 and 24.0 h. Additionally, antinociception was evaluated based on the protocol of the PIFIR (pain-induced functional impairment in the rat) model before blood sampling between 0.5 and 4.0 h. Significant differences in C_max, AUC_0-24, and AUC_0-∞ values were observed with caffeine administration (p < 0.05). Also, significant differences in E_max, T_max, and AUC_0-4 values were determined when comparing the treatments with and without caffeine (p < 0.05). By relating the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, a counter-clockwise hysteresis loop was observed regardless of the administration of caffeine. When the relationship between AUCe and AUCp was fitted to the sigmoidal E_max model, a satisfactory correlation was found (R² > 0.99) as well as significant differences in E_max and EC₅₀ values (p < 0.05). With caffeine, E_max and EC₅₀ values changed by 489.5% and 695.4%, respectively. The combination studied represents a convenient alternative for the treatment of pain when considering the advantages offered by using drugs with different mechanisms of action.

Caffeine in the management of patients with headache

Caffeinated headache medications, either alone or in combination with other treatments, are widely used by patients with headache. Clinicians should be familiar with their use as well as the chemistry, pharmacology, dietary and medical sources, clinical benefits, and potential safety issues of caffeine. In this review, we consider the role of caffeine in the over-the-counter treatment of headache. The MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched by combining “caffeine” with the terms “headache,” “migraine,” and “tension-type.” Studies that were not placebo-controlled or that involved medications available only with a prescription, as well as those not assessing patients with migraine and/or tension-type headache (TTH), were excluded. Compared with analgesic medication alone, combinations of caffeine with analgesic medications, including acetaminophen, acetylsalicylic acid, and ibuprofen, showed significantly improved efficacy in the treatment of patients with TTH or migraine, with favorable tolerability in the vast majority of patients. The most common adverse events were nervousness (6.5%), nausea (4.3%), abdominal pain/discomfort (4.1%), and dizziness (3.2%). This review provides evidence for the role of caffeine as an analgesic adjuvant in the acute treatment of primary headache with over-the-counter drugs, caffeine doses of 130 mg enhance the efficacy of analgesics in TTH and doses of ≥100 mg enhance benefits in migraine. Additional studies are needed to assess the relationship between caffeine dosing and clinical benefits in patients with TTH and migraine.

Antinociceptive Effect of Racemic Flurbiprofen and Caffeine Co-Administration in an Arthritic Gout-Type Pain in Rats

Preclinical Research Drug combinations are routinely used in the treatment of pain. In drug associations, adjuvants such as caffeine, are employed with different non-steroidal anti-inflammatories drugs (NSAIDs), however, at present does not exist studies showing the effect of the combination of racemic flurbiprofen (rac-Flur) in association with caffeine. The objective of this work was to evaluate the combination of rac-Flur + caffeine oral in arthritic gout-type pain in rats. The antinociceptive effects of the rac-Flur alone and in combination with caffeine were analyzed on a pain-induced functional impairment model in rat. rac-Flur induced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect and caffeine did not present any effect. The combination of rac-Flur and caffeine achieve a higher percentage of antinociceptive effect compared with the individual administration of rac-Flur. The dose-response curve (DRCs) shows that the combination of rac-Flur (31.6 mg/kg) + caffeine (17.8 mg/kg) exhibited the maximal antinociceptive efficacy (294.0 ± 21.2 area units), while rac-Flur alone (31.6 mg/kg) showed 207.2 ± 35.2 au, thus indicating an increase in efficacy (potentiation). Furthermore, the DRCs of the combinations presented a displacement to the left, indicating a change in the potency. Caffeine is able to increase the effect of rac-Flur in the arthritic gout-type pain in rats. Drug Dev Res 77 : 192-198, 2016.   © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Methylxanthines and pain

Caffeine, an antagonist of adenosine A(1), A(2A) and A(2B) receptors, is known as an adjuvant analgesic in combination with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen in humans. In preclinical studies, caffeine produces intrinsic antinociceptive effects in several rodent models, and augments the actions of NSAIDs and acetaminophen. Antagonism of adenosine A(2A) and A(2B) receptors, as well as inhibition of cyclooxygenase activity at some sites, may explain intrinsic antinociceptive and adjuvant actions. When combined with morphine, caffeine can augment, inhibit or have no effect depending on the dose, route of administration, nociceptive test and species; inhibition reflects spinal inhibition of adenosine A(1) receptors, while augmentation may reflect the intrinsic effects noted above. Low doses of caffeine given systemically inhibit antinociception by several analgesics (acetaminophen, amitriptyline, oxcarbazepine, cizolirtine), probably reflecting block of a component of action involving adenosine A(1) receptors. Clinical studies have demonstrated adjuvant analgesia, as well as some intrinsic analgesia, in the treatment of headache conditions, but not in the treatment of postoperative pain. Caffeine clearly exhibits complex effects on pain transmission; knowledge of such effects is important for understanding adjuvant analgesia as well as considering situations in which dietary caffeine intake may have an impact on analgesic regimens.

The efficacy of acetaminophen-caffeine compared to Ibuprofen in the control of postoperative pain after periodontal surgery: a crossover pilot study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies showed that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have significant benefits in the control of pain after periodontal surgery. Acetaminophen (centrally acting NSAID) is believed to provide less analgesic efficacy than ibuprofen (centrally and peripherally acting NSAID). This study compared an alternative combination of acetaminophen, 500 mg, with caffeine, 30 mg, to ibuprofen, 400 mg, in pain management after periodontal surgeries.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, double-masked crossover clinical trial was conducted on 15 patients. Open flap debridement was performed on two quadrants with a 3-week interval in between. Each quadrant was randomly assigned to acetaminophen, 500 mg, with caffeine, 30 mg, or ibuprofen, 400 mg, immediately after surgery and 8 hours after the first dose. Postoperative pain was assessed during the first 8 hours and on the following day using the 101-point numeric rate scale (NRS-101) and the four-point verbal rating scale (VRS-4).

RESULTS

Using the NRS-101, the acetaminophen-caffeine group showed statistically significantly lower mean pain scores than the ibuprofen group at 1 and 2 hours (P = 0.002), whereas at 6, 7, and 8 hours, the ibuprofen group showed statistically significantly lower mean pain scores (P <0.001). Using the VRS-4, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at all periods (P >0.05).

CONCLUSION

Acetaminophen, 500 mg, with caffeine, 30 mg, can be used efficiently in controlling postoperative pain after open flap debridement, especially in patients with gastric ulcers or bleeding tendency because acetaminophen is less hazardous than ibuprofen.

Caffeine accelerates absorption and enhances the analgesic effect of acetaminophen

The aim of this study was to determine the analgesic effect of acetaminophen compared to a combination of both caffeine and acetaminophen or caffeine alone using tonic and phasic pain stimulation. Twenty-four subjects were treated orally with 1000 mg acetaminophen, 130 mg caffeine, and a combination of both in a 4-way crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Pharmacokinetics and analgesic effects were assessed by means of an experimental pain model based on pain-related cortical potentials after phasic stimulation of the nasal mucosa with CO(2) and based on pain ratings after tonic stimulation with dry air. Analgesic effects of acetaminophen and acetaminophen plus caffeine but not caffeine alone caused a significant reduction of pain-related cortical potentials beginning 30 minutes after medication. The combination demonstrated an enhanced effect throughout the observation time up to 3 hours. Caffeine accelerated acetaminophen absorption, indicated by enhanced early AUCs. Significant analgesic effects of the combination on tonic pain ratings were found throughout the observation time as compared to acetaminophen and placebo. In this study, caffeine enhanced and prolonged the analgesic activity of acetaminophen.

Paracetamol inhibits nitric oxide synthesis in murine spinal cord slices

Paracetamol is an effective analgesic but its mechanism of action is unclear. We investigated the effect of paracetamol and the analgesic adjuvant caffeine on the activity of NO synthase in mouse spinal cord and cerebellar slices in vitro, by measuring the conversion of [(3)H]arginine to [(3)H]citrulline. Paracetamol (100 microM) had no effect on NO synthase activity in cerebellum, but in the spinal cord both paracetamol (100 microM) and caffeine (30 microM) attenuated glutamate (5 mM)-induced [(3)H]citrulline production and in combination they abolished it. In conclusion paracetamol inhibits spinal cord NO synthesis and this may be related to its analgesic effects.

Enhancement of antinociception by co-administration of ibuprofen and caffeine in arthritic rats

It has been observed that caffeine improves antinociceptive efficacy of some non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in several experimental models, however, these effects have been questioned in humans. Controversy in clinical studies may be due to the use of different protocols as well as to high interindividual variability in patient response. In addition, the antinociceptive interaction of ibuprofen+caffeine has not been studied. To assess a possible synergistic antinociceptive interaction, the antinociceptive effects of ibuprofen, and caffeine administered either separately or in combinations were determined in a model of arthritic pain: "Pain-induced functional impairment in the rat (PIFIR model). The antinociceptive efficacies were evaluated using several dose-response curves and time courses. The antinociceptive effects from the combination that produced the greater effect were compared with the maximal antinociceptive effect of either morphine or acetylsalicylic acid alone. The animals were administered with 0.05 ml intra-articular (i.a.) of uric acid to induce nociception. Groups of six rats received either acetylsalicylic acid, morphine, ibuprofen or caffeine, or a combination ibuprofen+caffeine (18 combinations). We report here that caffeine (17.8 and 31.6 mg/kg) is able to potentiate the antinociceptive effect of ibuprofen. This investigation showed that six combinations presented effects of potentiation and twelve combinations only showed antinociceptive effects not different from that of ibuprofen alone. The maximum antinociceptive effect was 270.7+/-12.7 area units (au), produced by ibuprofen 100 mg/kg+caffeine 17.8 mg/kg; this effect was greater than the maximum produced by morphine 17.8 mg/kg (244.7+/-22.9 au) in these experimental conditions. The maximum potentiation was 197 % produced with the combination of ibuprofen 17.8 mg/kg+caffeine 17.8 mg/kg. These results suggest that the antinociceptive effect of ibuprofen was significantly potentiated by doses of caffeine that by themselves are ineffective in this model.

Modulation of paracetamol antinociception by caffeine and by selective adenosine A2 receptor antagonists in mice

This study investigated the involvement of adenosine receptors in the interaction between paracetamol and caffeine in mice, using the adenosine A2A receptor antagonist 5-amino-7-(2-phenylethyl)-2-(2-furyl)pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine (SCH58261) and the adenosine A2B receptor antagonist 1-propyl-8-p-sulfophenylxanthine (PSB1115), in the tail immersion and hot-plate tests. Paracetamol (10-200 mg/kg) was antinociceptive in both tests, but, in contrast to previous studies, caffeine (10 mg/kg) was pronociceptive in the tail immersion test, and reduced the effects of paracetamol in both tests. SCH58261 (3 mg/kg) was antinociceptive in both tests and in its presence paracetamol (50 mg/kg) had no further effect. PSB1115 (10 mg/kg) had little effect alone but potentiated the effect of paracetamol (50 mg/kg) in the hot-plate test and abolished it in the tail immersion test. These results suggest that adenosine A2B receptors may be involved in the action of paracetamol in a pathway-dependent manner, and also support the existence of pronociceptive adenosine A2A receptors.

Allodynia and hyperalgesia in adjuvant-induced arthritic rats: time course of progression and efficacy of analgesics

The complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)-induced arthritic rat model has extensively served as a laboratory model in the study of arthritic pain. However, the time courses of allodynia and hyperalgesia and the efficacies of different analgesics have not fully been analyzed in this model. Mechanical allodynia, thermal and joint hyperalgesia, and other disease development parameters (body weight, mobility, paw volume, and joint stiffness) were measured on postinoculation days (PIDs) 0 to 28 in rats. Acute analgesic efficacies of drugs were evaluated on PID 9 when degrees of allodynia, hyperalgesia, and joint stiffness in the ipsilateral paw reached almost the maximum, although those in the contralateral paw changed only slightly. In the ipsilateral paw, thermal hyperalgesia reached the maximum on PID 1, whereas mechanical allodynia and joint hyperalgesia progressively developed during the first 7 or 8 days, being tuned in to arthritis development. In the contralateral paw, thermal hyperalgesia never occurred, whereas mechanical allodynia and joint hyperalgesia developed after PID 11. Morphine and tramadol had full efficacies for all the pain parameters tested at sedation-inducing doses. Indomethacin and diclofenac significantly but partially improved thermal and joint hyperalgesia. Amitriptyline significantly reduced thermal and joint hyperalgesia only at sedation-inducing dose. Acetaminophen, carbamazepine, and gabapentin had, at the most, very small efficacies. In conclusion, the present study provided integrated information about the time course of pain and other disease development parameters in the CFA-induced arthritic rats, and clarified acute efficacies of different categories of analgesics for the allodynia and hyperalgesia.

The heritability of antinociception II: pharmacogenetic mediation of three over-the-counter analgesics in mice

Chromosomal loci containing genes affecting antinociceptive sensitivity to morphine have been identified, but virtually nothing is known about the genetic mediation of sensitivity to over-the-counter analgesics. Such knowledge would be of great clinical interest, as prodigious interindividual variability has been noted in the efficacy of these ubiquitously used drugs. In the present study, we assessed heritability and genetic correlations among three over-the-counter analgesics in mice of 12 inbred mouse strains on the 0.9% acetic acid (i.p.) writhing test. Analgesics included the centrally acting analgesic, acetaminophen (150 mg/kg, s.c.), and the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), indomethacin (40 mg/kg, s.c.) and lysine-acetylsalicylic acid (800 mg/kg, s.c.). Significant strain differences in sensitivity to each of the drugs were observed, with narrow-sense heritability estimates ranging from 23 to 45%. Similar strains were sensitive and resistant, respectively, to the two NSAIDs (r(s) = 0.64). In contrast, a completely different pattern of sensitivities was observed for acetaminophen, implying genetic dissociation (r(s) = 0.29 and 0.02) compared with the NSAIDs. Additional experiments were performed on two strains, C57BL/6 and DBA/2, with extreme sensitivities to acetaminophen. Plasma acetaminophen levels in these strains were not significantly different during the time of antinociception assessment, suggesting the existence of genetic factors affecting acetaminophen pharmacodynamics rather than pharmacokinetics.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the antinociceptive effect of baclofen in mice

The aim of this study was the development of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model of the antinociceptive effect of baclofen in mice. We studied the dose response curve of the analgesic action of baclofen in mice by hot plate test. Baclofen produced a dose dependent antinociceptive effect with doses between 1-3 mg/kg administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) (ED50: 1.94 mg/kg of racemate) and this effect fits to a linear pharmacodynamic model. Blood and brain concentrations of (-)3H-baclofen were determined by Thin-Layer Chromatography (TLC) and counted in the scintillation-counter. The PK/PD models were analyzed with the PC-TOPFIT V.2.0 and the tests for distinguishing between models were several adjustment parameters as Akaike information criterion (AIC), Imbimbo criterion (Ip), standard deviation (SD) and the correlation coefficient (r2). Accordingly with these adjustment parameters, a 2 compartment open model was selected where plasma is the central compartment and brain is in the peripheral compartment. In this model, the effect is linked to the peripheral compartment. When the antinociceptive effect of baclofen was plotted against blood concentration, the resulting curve exhibited an anticlockwise hysteresis loop, but on the other hand, when the antinociceptive effect was plotted against the brain concentration, the hysteresis was collapsed. These results confirmed the selected model in our study, as the best adjustment was shown when the pharmacological response was linked to the peripheral compartment.

A benefit-risk assessment of caffeine as an analgesic adjuvant

Caffeine has been an additive in analgesics for many years. However, the analgesic adjuvant effects of caffeine have not been seriously investigated since a pooled analysis conducted in 1984 showed that caffeine reduces the amount of paracetamol (acetaminophen) necessary for the same effect by approximately 40%. In vitro and in vivo pharmacological research has provided some evidence that caffeine can have anti-nociceptive actions through blockade of adenosine receptors, inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase-2 enzyme synthesis, or by changes in emotion state. Nevertheless, these actions are only considered in some cases. It is suggested that the actual doses of analgesics and caffeine used can influence the analgesic adjuvant effects of caffeine, and doses that are either too low or too high lead to no analgesic enhancement. Clinical trials suggest that caffeine in doses of more than 65 mg may be useful for enhancement of analgesia. However, except for in headache pain, the benefits are equivocal. While adding caffeine to analgesics increases the number of patients who become free from headache [rate ratio = 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17 to 1.58], it also leads to more patients with nervousness and dizziness (relative risk = 1.60, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.03). It is suggested that long-term use or overuse of analgesic medications is associated with rebound headache. However, there is no robust evidence that headache after use or withdrawal of caffeine-containing analgesics is more frequent than after other analgesics. Case-control studies have shown that caffeine-containing analgesics are associated with analgesic nephropathy (odds ratio = 4.9, 95% CI 2.3 to 10.3). However, no specific contribution of caffeine to analgesic nephropathy can be identified from these studies. Whether caffeine produces nephrotoxicity on its own, or increases nephrotoxicity due to analgesics, is yet to be established.

Effect of caffeine on antinociceptive action of ketoprofen in rats

BACKGROUND

To assess a possible synergistic antinociceptive interaction, the antinociceptive effects of ketoprofen (KET), and caffeine (CAF) administered either separately or in combinations were determined in a model of arthritic pain.

METHODS

Antinociceptive activity was assayed using "ellipsis pain-induced functional impairment in the rat" (PIFIR model). The antinociceptive efficacies were evaluated using several dose-response curves and time courses. The antinociceptive effects from the combination that produced the greater effect were compared with the maximal antinociceptive effect of either morphine, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), or KET alone. The animals were administered with 0.05 mL intra-articular (i.a.) of uric acid to induce nociception. Groups of six rats received orally either ASA, morphine (MOR), KET, CAF, or a combination KET + CAF (24 combinations).

RESULTS

ASA (ED(50) 465.2 +/- 1.5 mg/kg), MOR (ED(50) 71.0 +/- 1.6 mg/kg), and KET (ED(50) 7.2 +/- 1.4 mg/kg) alone induced dose-dependent antinociception, whereas CAF alone showed no activity at the assayed doses. Nine combinations showed various degrees of potentiation (p <0.01), while the remainder exhibited the antinociceptive effect of KET only. Combinations of 17.8 mg/kg CAF with either 1.0, 1.8, 3.2, 5.6, or 10.0 mg/kg KET yielded the highest antinociceptive potentiations. For example, antinociceptive effect was 125.6 +/- 21.4 area units (au) with KET (3.2 mg/kg) alone, but the combination with CAF (17.8 mg/kg) showed 309.5 +/- 10.3 au. The median effective dose (ED(50)) of KET alone was 7.2 +/- 1.4 mg/kg, whereas the ED(50) of KET + CAF 17.8 mg/kg was 0.4 +/- 0.6 mg/kg: KET in the presence of CAF was approximately 18 times more potent than the analgesic drug without CAF.

CONCLUSIONS

These results showed that CAF was able to potentiate the analgesia of KET, but only at selected dose combinations: CAF in the doses of 10.0 and 17.8 mg/kg was able to potentiate the analgesic effect of KET, the most efficacious drug combination being CAF 17.8 mg/kg + KET 3.2 mg/kg. The combination of analgesic drugs and CAF can produce better antinociceptive effects than the analgesic drug alone. This knowledge will permit the selection of the therapeutically most effective combination ratio of drugs, employing lower doses of each drug.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling: why?

At present, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling has emerged as a major tool in clinical pharmacology to optimize drug use by designing rational dosage forms and dosage regimes. Quantitative representation of the dose-concentration-response relationship should provide information for prediction of the level of response to a certain level of drug dose. Several mathematical approaches can be used to describe such relationships, depending on the single dose or the steady-state measurements carried out. With concentration and response data on-phase, basic models such as fixed-effect, linear, log-linear, E(MAX), and sigmoid E(MAX) can be sufficient. However, time-variant pharmacodynamic models (effect compartment, acute tolerance, sensitization, and indirect responses) can be required when kinetics and response are out-of-phase. To date, methodologies available for PK-PD analysis barely suppose the use of powerful computing resources. Some of these algorithms are able to generate individual estimates of parameters based on population analysis and Bayesian forecasting. Notwithstanding, attention must be paid to avoid overinterpreted data from mathematical models, so that reliability and clinical significance of estimated parameters will be valuable when underlying physiologic processes (disease, age, gender, etc.) are considered.

A review of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors in the potentiation of the antinociceptive effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs by caffeine

Caffeine is an effective analgesic adjuvant because it increases the antinociceptive effect of NSAIDs while reducing the probability of side effects. The mechanism by which caffeine increases the antinociceptive action of NSAIDs does not appear to include a pharmacokinetic interaction. The potentiation appears to be due to a pharmacokinetic mechanism including actions at the central and the peripheral levels. Because caffeine shifts the effect-compartment concentration-effect relation of NSAIDs to the left and this relationship is sigmoidal, there is no potentiation if the NSAID concentrations are too high or too low with respect to EC(50). The best potentiation can be observed if the NSAID doses used yield effect-compartment concentrations in the vicinity of EC(50). Therefore further investigation of the PK/PD relations of caffeine-NSAID combinations for different pain states and intensities is needed to optimize the therapeutic use of these mixtures.

Effect of coadministration of caffeine and either adenosine agonists or cyclic nucleotides on ketorolac analgesia

Caffeine potentiation of ketorolac-induced antinociception in the pain-induced functional impairment model in rats was assessed. Caffeine alone was ineffective, but increased the effect of ketorolac without affecting its pharmacokinetics. Intra-articular administration of adenosine and N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA, an adenosine A1 receptor agonist), but not 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine hydrochloride (CGS-21680, an adenosine A2A receptor agonist), significantly increased ketorolac antinociception. This effect was not local, as contralateral administration was also effective. Ipsilateral and contralateral administration of adenosine and CHA also increased antinociception by ketorolac-caffeine. Intra-articular 8-Bromo-adenosine cyclic 3',5'-hydrogen phosphate sodium or 8-Bromo-guanosine-3',5'-cyclophosphate sodium (cGMP) given ipsilaterally or contralaterally did not affect ketorolac-induced antinociception. Nevertheless, ipsilateral, but not contralateral, administration of 8-Br-cGMP significantly increased antinociception by ketorolac-caffeine, suggesting a local effect. The results suggest that caffeine potentiation of ketorolac antinociception is mediated, at least partially, by a local increase in cGMP and rule out the participation of adenosine receptor blockade.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of tolmetin antinociceptive effect in the rat using an indirect response model: a population approach

The relationship between the pharmacokinetics and the antinociceptive effect of tolmetin was characterized by an indirect model using a population approach. Animals received an intra-articular injection of uric acid in the right hindlimb to induce its dysfunction. Once dysfunction was complete, rats received an oral tolmetin dose of 1, 3.2, 10, 31.6, 56.2 or 100 mg/kg and antinociceptive effect and blood tolmetin concentration were simultaneously evaluated. Tolmetin produced a dose-dependent recovery of functionality, which was not directly related to blood concentration. An inhibitory indirect response model was used based on these response patterns and the fact that tolmetin reduced nociception by inhibiting prostaglandin synthesis. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data were simultaneously fitted using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM) to the one-compartment model and indirect response model. The individual time courses of the response were described using Bayesian analysis with population parameters as a priori estimates. There was good agreement between the predicted and observed data. Population analysis yielded a maximal inhibition of the nociceptive response of 76% and an IC50 of 9.22 micrograms/ml. This IC50 is similar to that for tolmetin-induced prostaglandin synthesis inhibition in vitro (3.0 micrograms/ml). The present results demonstrate that mechanism-based PK-PD analysis using a population approach is useful for quantitating individual responses as well as reflecting the actual mechanism of action of a given drug in vivo.

Adenosine receptor activation and nociception

Adenosine and ATP exert multiple influences on pain transmission at peripheral and spinal sites. At peripheral nerve terminals in rodents, adenosine A1 receptor activation produces antinociception by decreasing, while adenosine A1 receptor activation produces pronociceptive or pain enhancing properties by increasing, cyclic AMP levels in the sensory nerve terminal. Adenosine A3 receptor activation produces pain behaviours due to the release of histamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine from mast cells and subsequent actions on the sensory nerve terminal. In humans, the peripheral administration of adenosine produces pain responses resembling that generated under ischemic conditions and the local release of adenosine may contribute to ischemic pain. In the spinal cord, adenosine A receptor activation produces antinociceptive properties in acute nociceptive, inflammatory and neuropathic pain tests. This is seen at doses lower than those which produce motor effects. Antinociception results from the inhibition of intrinsic neurons by an increase in K+ conductance and presynaptic inhibition of sensory nerve terminals to inhibit the release of substance P and perhaps glutamate. There are observations suggesting some involvement of spinal adenosine A2 receptors in pain processing, but no data on any adenosine A3 receptor involvement. Endogenous adenosine systems contribute to antinociceptive properties of caffeine, opioids, noradrenaline, 5-hydroxytryptamine, tricyclic antidepressants and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Purinergic systems exhibit a significant potential for development as therapeutic agents. An understanding of the contribution of adenosine to pain processing is important for understanding how caffeine produces adjuvant analgesic properties in some situations, but might interfere with the optimal benefit to be derived from others.

Effect of caffeine coadministration and of nitric oxide synthesis inhibition on the antinociceptive action of ketorolac

The effects of caffeine and nitric oxide synthesis inhibition on the antinociceptive action of ketorolac were assessed using the pain-induced functional impairment model in the rat. Nociception was induced by the intra-articular injection of uric acid. Ketorolac, but not caffeine, produced an antinociceptive effect which was reduced by NG nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthesis. Caffeine coadministration potentiated the ketorolac effect. L-NAME induced a dose-dependent reduction of this potentiation. The results suggest the participation of the L-arginine-nitric oxide-cyclic GMP pathway in the caffeine potentiation of ketorolac-induced antinociception.

The antinociceptive action of paracetamol is associated with changes in the serotonergic system in the rat brain

The antinociceptive activity of paracetamol in the hot plate and formalin tests was studied to establish the relationship between antinociceptive activity and the central serotonergic system. Significant antinociceptive activity of paracetamol was observed in the formalin test at the dose of 300 mg/kg, while, at the dose of 400 mg/kg, the drug was active both in the formalin and in the hot-plate test. Serum paracetamol levels remained sub-toxic and the behavioral profile remained unchanged. Depletion of brain serotonin with p-chlorophenylalanine prevented the antinociceptive effect of paracetamol in the hot-plate test and in the first phase of the formalin response. Paracetamol significantly increased the serotonin content in the pontine and cortical areas (by 75 and 70%, respectively). The pretreatment with p-chlorophenylalanine reduced the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) content in cortical and pontine areas to 12 and 19% of baseline values, respectively, and prevented the enhancement induced by paracetamol. The maximum number of cortical 5-HT2 receptors was reduced by paracetamol, while the number of 5-HT1A receptors in both cortical and pontine areas was unchanged. Pre-treatment with p-chlorophenylalanine prevented the reduction in the number of 5-HT2 receptors induced by paracetamol. These results provide evidence for the involvement of the central serotonergic system in the antinociceptive effect of paracetamol in the hot plate and formalin tests.

Usefulness of the pain-induced functional impairment model to relate plasma levels of analgesics to their efficacy in rats

In this work we show that the pain-induced functional impairment model (PIFIR) can be used with cannulated rats as a useful procedure for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling. This model evaluates analgesia by measuring motor impairment of the right limb after intra-articular administration of uric acid. Time of contact with a rotating cylinder is referred to the control limb. We studied the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics of naproxen after six peroral doses to Wistar rats, and we examined the adjuvant action of caffeine with naproxen. Surgery and blood sampling did not produce any difference on functional impairment either in rats without uric acid or in the dysfunction produced by uric acid. The relation between naproxen plasma concentration and the analgesic effect was obtained with few rats. Caffeine alone did not produce any significant modification in functional impairment but the co-administration significantly increased the effect of naproxen. Plasma levels of naproxen did not change when caffeine was co-administered. The PIFIR model with blood sampling is a suitable method for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship studies and is specially useful to characterize drug-drug interactions.