1
|
Squires JE, Graham ID, Santos WJ, Hutchinson AM. The Implementation in Context (ICON) Framework: A meta-framework of context domains, attributes and features in healthcare. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:81. [PMID: 37550737 PMCID: PMC10408185 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01028-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is growing evidence that context mediates the effects of implementation interventions intended to increase healthcare professionals' use of research evidence in clinical practice. However, conceptual clarity about what comprises context is elusive. The purpose of this study was to advance conceptual clarity on context by developing the Implementation in Context Framework, a meta-framework of the context domains, attributes and features that can facilitate or hinder healthcare professionals' use of research evidence and the effectiveness of implementation interventions in clinical practice. METHODS We conducted a meta-synthesis of data from three interrelated studies: (1) a concept analysis of published literature on context (n = 70 studies), (2) a secondary analysis of healthcare professional interviews (n = 145) examining context across 11 unique studies and (3) a descriptive qualitative study comprised of interviews with heath system stakeholders (n = 39) in four countries to elicit their tacit knowledge on the attributes and features of context. A rigorous protocol was followed for the meta-synthesis, resulting in development of the Implementation in Context Framework. Following this meta-synthesis, the framework was further refined through feedback from experts in context and implementation science. RESULTS In the Implementation in Context Framework, context is conceptualized in three levels: micro (individual), meso (organizational), and macro (external). The three levels are composed of six contextual domains: (1) actors (micro), (2) organizational climate and structures (meso), (3) organizational social behaviour (meso), (4) organizational response to change (meso), (5) organizational processes (meso) and (6) external influences (macro). These six domains contain 22 core attributes of context and 108 features that illustrate these attributes. CONCLUSIONS The Implementation in Context Framework is the only meta-framework of context available to guide implementation efforts of healthcare professionals. It provides a comprehensive and critically needed understanding of the context domains, attributes and features relevant to healthcare professionals' use of research evidence in clinical practice. The Implementation in Context Framework can inform implementation intervention design and delivery to better interpret the effects of implementation interventions, and pragmatically guide implementation efforts that enhance evidence uptake and sustainability by healthcare professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet E Squires
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
| | - Ian D Graham
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Wilmer J Santos
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Alison M Hutchinson
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alshyyab MA, Borkoles E, Albsoul RA, Kinnear FB, FitzGerald G. Safety culture in emergency medicine: An exploratory qualitative study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE 2022; 33:365-383. [PMID: 35213391 DOI: 10.3233/jrs-210031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Safety culture in Emergency Departments (EDs) requires special attention due to unique operational feature of the ED environment. Which may influence a culture of patients' safety in the ED. OBJECTIVE To identify the factors that influence patient safety culture in EDs. METHODS A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 12 ED staff was carried out in two Australian EDs. The data was thematically analysed to identify and describe the factors perceived by staff as influencing patient safety culture. RESULTS The findings revealed four super-ordinate themes and 19 categories. The themes were the following: (1) Environmental and Organisational; (2) Healthcare Professional (3) Managerial factors; and (4) Patients factors. CONCLUSIONS Safety culture in the ED is influenced by complex set of factors. The results of this study may help ED workers with improving patient safety culture and healthcare quality in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Ahmed Alshyyab
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Erika Borkoles
- School of Medicine, Gold Coast Campus, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia
| | - Rania Ali Albsoul
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Jordan University, Aman, Jordan
| | - Frances B Kinnear
- Emergency Department, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Gerard FitzGerald
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Searle K, Blashki G, Kakuma R, Yang H, Lu S, Li B, Xiao Y, Minas H. Adapting the depression component of WHO Mental Health Gap Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG.v2) for primary care in Shenzhen, China: a DELPHI study. Int J Ment Health Syst 2022; 16:13. [PMID: 35168656 PMCID: PMC8845283 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-022-00523-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Primary care doctors in Shenzhen, China are increasingly expected to identify and prevent depressive disorder; however, they have received limited mental health training and community healthcare centres (CHC) do not provide standardised protocols for the diagnosis and care of depressive disorder. The World Health Organization’s mental health gap intervention guide, version 2 (mhGAP-IG.v2) is a decision support tool for non-specialists for the assessment, management and follow-up of mental, neurological and substance use disorders (including depressive disorder). Given that mhGAP-IG.v2 is a generic tool, it requires adaptation to take account of cultural differences in depression presentation and unique characteristics of China’s emergent mental health system. Methods A two-round, web-based, Delphi survey was conducted. A panel of primary care doctors from Shenzhen, were invited to score their level of agreement with 199 statements (arranged across 10 domains) proposing changes to the content and structure of mhGAP-IG.v2 for use in Shenzhen. Consensus was predefined as 80% panelists providing a rating of either “somewhat agree/definitely agree”, or “definitely disagree/somewhat disagree” on a five-point scale for agreement. Results 79% of statements received consensus with a mean score of 4.26 (i.e. “somewhat agree”). Agreed adaptations for mhGAP-IG.v2 included:- an assessment approach which considers a broader spectrum of depression symptoms and reflects the life course of disease; incorporating guidance for screening tool usage; clarifying physicians’ roles and including referral pathways for intersectorial care with strong family involvement; aligning drug treatment with national formularies; stronger emphasis of suicide prevention throughout all sections of the guide; contextualizing health education; reflecting a person-centred approach to care. Panelists chose to maintain diagnostic and treatment advice for bipolar patients experiencing a depressive episode as in the current guide. Conclusions An adapted mhGAP-IG.v2 for depression recognises China’s cultural and contextual needs for assessment guidance; unique primary healthcare system organization, priorities and treatment availability; and diverse psychosocial educational needs. An adapted mhGAP-IG.v2 could both inform the future training programs for primary care in Shenzhen and also offer an additional mental health resource for non-specialists in other countries. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13033-022-00523-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kendall Searle
- Global and Cultural Mental Health Unit, Centre for Mental Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
| | - Grant Blashki
- Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Ritsuko Kakuma
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HTE, England, UK
| | - Hui Yang
- Monash Institute for Health and Clinical Education, School of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, 3168, Australia
| | - Shurong Lu
- Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Baoqi Li
- Shenzhen Guangming Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Bao'an District, Shenzhen, 518107, China
| | - Yingying Xiao
- Shenzhen Guangming Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Bao'an District, Shenzhen, 518107, China
| | - Harry Minas
- Global and Cultural Mental Health Unit, Centre for Mental Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maher BL, Guthrie J, Sturgiss EA, Cargo M, Lovett R. Defining collective capability in Australian evaluations that are conducted by, for and with Indigenous peoples for health programmes, policies and services: a concept analysis protocol. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e055304. [PMID: 34716169 PMCID: PMC8559119 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Indigenist evaluation is emergent in Australia; the premise of which is that evaluations are undertaken for Indigenous, by Indigenous and with Indigenous people. This provides opportunities to develop new models and approaches. Exploring a collective capability approach could be one way to inform an Indigenist evaluation methodology. Collective capability suggests that a base of skills and knowledges exist, and when these assets come together, empowerment and agency emerge. However, collective capability requires defining as it is not common terminology in population health or evaluation. Our aim is to define the concept of collective capability in Indigenist evaluation in Australia from an Australian Indigenous standpoint. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A modified Rodgers' evolutionary concept analysis will be used to define collective capability in an Australian Indigenous evaluation context, and to systematically review and synthesise the literature. Approximately 20 qualitative interviews with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander knowledge holders will clarify the meaning of collective capability and inform appropriate search strategy terms with a consensus process then used to code the literature. We will then systematically collate, synthesise and analyse the literature to identify exemplars or models of collective capability from the literature. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The protocol has approval from the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Ethics Committee, approval no. EO239-20210114. All knowledge holders will provide written consent to participate in the research. This protocol provides a process to developing a concept, and will form the basis of a new framework and assessment tool for Indigenist evaluation practice. The concept analysis will establish definitions, characteristics and attributes of collective capability. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal, conference presentations, the project advisory group, the Thiitu Tharrmay reference group and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community partners supporting the project.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobby Lee Maher
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Jillian Guthrie
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Ann Sturgiss
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
| | - Margaret Cargo
- Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Raymond Lovett
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Roux TL, Heinen MM, Murphy SP, Buggy CJ. A Unified Theoretical Framework of Learning Theories to Inform and Guide Public Health Continuing Medical Education Research and Practice. THE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 2021; 41:130-138. [PMID: 34057910 PMCID: PMC8168933 DOI: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Continuing medical education (CME) emerged at the start of the 20th century as a means of maintaining clinical competence among health care practitioners. However, evidence indicates that CME is often poorly developed and inappropriately used. Consequently, there has been increasing interest in the literature in evaluating wider contexts at play in CME development and delivery. In this article, the authors present a unified theoretical framework, grounded in learning theories, to explore the role of contextual factors in public health CME for health care practitioners. Discussion with pedagogical experts together with a narrative review of learning theories within medical and social science literature informed the framework's development. The need to consider sociocultural theories of learning within medical education restricted suitable theories to those that recognized contexts beyond the individual learner; adopted a systems approach to evaluate interactions between contexts and learner; and considered learning as more than mere acquisition of knowledge. Through a process of rigorous critical analysis, two theoretical models emerged as contextually appropriate: Biggs principle of constructive alignment and Bronfenbrenner bioecological model of human development. Biggs principle offers theoretical clarity surrounding interactive factors that encourage lifelong learning, whereas the Bronfenbrenner model expands on these factor's roles across multiple system levels. The authors explore how unification into a single framework complements each model while elaborating on its fundamental and practical applications. The unified theoretical framework presented in this article addresses the limitations of isolated frameworks and allows for the exploration of the applicability of wider learning theories in CME research.
Collapse
|
6
|
Laukka E, Pölkki T, Heponiemi T, Kaihlanen AM, Kanste O. Leadership in Digital Health Services: Protocol for a Concept Analysis. JMIR Res Protoc 2021; 10:e25495. [PMID: 33538702 PMCID: PMC7892283 DOI: 10.2196/25495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Due to the rapid digitalization of health care, leadership is becoming more complex. Leadership in digital health services is a term that has been used in the literature with various meanings. Conceptualization of leadership in digital health services is needed to deliver higher quality digital health services, update existing leadership practices, and advance research. Objective The aim of this study is to outline a concept analysis that aims to clarify and define the concept of leadership in digital health services. Methods The concept analysis will be performed using the Walker and Avant model, which involves eight steps: concept selection, determination of aims, identification of uses, determination of defining attributes, construction of a model case, construction of additional cases, identification of antecedents and consequences, and definition of empirical referents. A scoping literature search will be performed following the search protocol for scoping reviews by the Joanna Briggs Institute to identify all relevant literature on leadership in digital health services. Searches will be conducted in 6 scientific databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, and the Finnish database Medic), and unpublished studies and gray literature will be searched using Google Scholar, EBSCO Open Dissertations, and MedNar. Results An initial limited search of MEDLINE was undertaken on October 19, 2020, resulting in 883 records. The results of the concept analysis will be submitted for publication by July 2021. Conclusions A robust conceptualization of leadership in digital health services is needed to support research, leadership, and education. The concept analysis model of Walker and Avant will be used to meet this need. As leadership in digital health services appears to be an interprofessional and intersectoral collaboration, defining this concept may also facilitate collaboration between professionals and sectors. The concept analysis to be conducted will also expand our understanding of leadership in digital health services. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/25495
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elina Laukka
- Research Unit of Nursing Science and Health Management, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.,Health and Social Service System Research, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tarja Pölkki
- Research Unit of Nursing Science and Health Management, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.,Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Tarja Heponiemi
- Health and Social Service System Research, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anu-Marja Kaihlanen
- Health and Social Service System Research, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Outi Kanste
- Research Unit of Nursing Science and Health Management, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Harris AHS, Hagedorn HJ, Finlay AK. Delta Studies: Expanding the Concept of Deviance Studies to Design More Effective Improvement Interventions. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36:280-287. [PMID: 32935314 PMCID: PMC7878588 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06199-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effects of improvement (implementation and de-implementation) interventions are often modest. Although positive and negative deviance studies have been extensively used in improvement science and quality improvement efforts, conceptual and methodological innovations are needed to improve our ability to use information about variation in quality to design more effective interventions. OBJECTIVE We describe a novel mixed methods extension of the deviance study we term "delta studies." Delta studies seek to quantitatively identify sites that have recently changed from low performers to high performers, or vice versa, in order to qualitatively learn about active strategies that produced recent change, challenges change agents faced and how they overcame them, and where applicable, the causes of recent deterioration in performance-information intended to inform the design of improvement interventions for deployment in low performing sites. We provide examples of lessons learned from this method that may have been missed with traditional positive or negative deviance designs. DESIGN Considerations for quantitatively identifying delta sites are described including which quality metrics to track, over what timeframe to observe change, how to account for reliability of observed change, consideration of patient volume and initial performance as implementation context factors, and how to define clinically meaningful change. Methods to adapt qualitative protocols by integrating quantitative information about change in performance are also presented. We provide sample data and R code that can be used to graphically display distributions of initial status, change, and volume that are essential to delta studies. PARTICIPANTS Patients and facilities of the US Veterans Health Administration. KEY RESULTS As an example, we discuss what decisions we made regarding the delta study design considerations in a funded study of low-value preoperative testing. The method helped us find sites that had recently reduced the burden of low-value testing, and learn about the strategies they employed and challenges they faced. CONCLUSIONS The delta study concept is a promising mixed methods innovation to efficiently and effectively identify improvement strategies and other factors that have actually produced change in real-world settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex H S Harris
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
- Stanford -Surgical Policy Improvement Research and Education Center, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Hildi J Hagedorn
- Center for Care Delivery & Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Andrea K Finlay
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Balice-Bourgois C, Newman CJ, Simonetti GD, Zumstein-Shaha M. A complex interprofessional intervention to improve the management of painful procedures in neonates. PAEDIATRIC & NEONATAL PAIN 2020; 2:63-73. [PMID: 35547023 PMCID: PMC8975212 DOI: 10.1002/pne2.12012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Revised: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
During hospitalization, neonates are exposed to a stressful environment and a high number of painful procedures. If pain is not treated adequately, short‐ and long‐term complications may develop. Despite evidence about neonatal pain and available guidelines, procedural pain remains undertreated. This gap between research and practice is mostly due to limited implementation of evidence‐based knowledge and time constraints. This study describes in detail the development process of a complex interprofessional intervention to improve the management of procedural pain in neonates called NEODOL© (NEOnato DOLore). The framework of the Medical Research Council (MRC) for the development and evaluation of complex interventions was used as a methodological guide for the design of the NEODOL© intervention. The development of the intervention is based on several steps and multiple methods. To report this process, we used the Criteria for Reporting the Development of Complex Interventions in Healthcare (CReDECI 2). Additionally, we evaluated the content of the intervention using a Delphi method to obtain consensus from experts, stakeholders, and parents. The complex interprofessional intervention, NEODOL©, is developed and designed for three groups: healthcare professionals, parents, and neonates for a level IIb neonatal unit at a regional hospital in southern Switzerland. A total of 16 panelists participated in the Delphi process. At the end of the Delphi process, the panelists endorsed the NEODOL© intervention as important and feasible. Following the MRC guidelines, a multimethod process was used to develop a complex interprofessional intervention to improve the management of painful procedures in newborns. Complex interprofessional interventions need theoretical bases, careful development, and integration of stakeholders to provide a comprehensive approach. The NEODOL intervention consists of promising components and has the potential to improve the management of painful procedures and should facilitate the knowledge translation into practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colette Balice-Bourgois
- Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale Pediatric Institute of Southern Switzerland Bellinzona Switzerland.,Nursing Research Center Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale Bellinzona Switzerland.,Faculty of Biology and Medicine University Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
| | - Christopher J Newman
- Paediatric Neurology and Neurorehabilitation Unit Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland
| | - Giacomo D Simonetti
- Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale Pediatric Institute of Southern Switzerland Bellinzona Switzerland.,Faculty of Biomedical Sciences University of Southern Switzerland Lugano Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Morrow A, Tucker KM, Shaw TJ, Parkinson B, Abraham C, Wolfenden L, Taylor N. Understanding implementation success: protocol for an in-depth, mixed-methods process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial testing methods to improve detection of Lynch syndrome in Australian hospitals. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e033552. [PMID: 32540886 PMCID: PMC7299044 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In multisite intervention trials, implementation success often varies widely across settings. Process evaluations are crucial to interpreting trial outcomes and understanding contextual factors and causal chains necessary for successful implementation. Lynch syndrome is a hereditary cancer predisposition conferring an increased risk of colorectal, endometrial and other cancer types. Despite systematic screening protocols to identify Lynch syndrome, the condition remains largely underdiagnosed. The Hide and Seek Project ('HaSP') is a cluster randomised controlled trial determining the effectiveness of two approaches to improving Lynch syndrome detection at eight Australian hospital networks. To enhance widespread implementation of optimal Lynch syndrome identification, there is a need to understand not only what works, but also why, in what contexts, and at what costs. Here we describe an in-depth investigation of factors influencing successful implementation of procedures evaluated in the HaSP trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A mixed-methods, theory-driven process evaluation will be undertaken in parallel to the HaSP trial. Data will include: interviews of Implementation Leads and Lynch syndrome stakeholders, pre-post implementation questionnaires, audio analysis of meetings and focus groups, observation of multidisciplinary team meetings, fidelity checklists and project log analysis. Results will be triangulated and coded, drawing on the Theoretical Domains Framework, Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and Proctor's implementation outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Use of a theory-based process evaluation will enhance interpretation and generalisability of HaSP trial findings, and contribute to the implementation research field by furthering understanding of the conditions necessary for implementation success. Ethical approval has been granted and results will be disseminated via publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. At trial completion, key findings will be fed back to sites to enable refinement of intervention strategies, both in the context of Lynch syndrome and for the possible generalisability of intervention components in other genetic and broader clinical specialties. HASP TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Identifier: ACTRN12618001072202). Registered 27 June 2018. http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12618001072202.aspx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- April Morrow
- Cancer Council New South Wales, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katherine M Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital and Community Health Services, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- UNSW Prince of Wales Clinical School, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tim J Shaw
- Research in Implementation Science and eHealth (RISe), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bonny Parkinson
- The Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Charles Abraham
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Natalie Taylor
- Cancer Council New South Wales, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hitch D, Lhuede K, Giles S, Low R, Cranwell K, Stefaniak R. Perceptions of leadership styles in occupational therapy practice. Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl) 2020. [DOI: 10.1108/lhs-11-2019-0074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
Leadership is a critical topic in healthcare because of its influence on direction and culture. This study aims to measure perceptions of leadership styles amongst occupational therapy clinicians. The study also sought to identify any significant differences between the perceptions of clinician groups, compare findings with established norms and explore associations between leadership styles and outcomes.
Design/methodology/approach
A cross sectional, descriptive study method was used, using the multifactor leadership questionnaire 5X (MLQ-5X) to survey occupational therapists working in physical and mental health clinical services in Australia. Descriptive statistics were used to address the aims of this study.
Findings
A number of significant differences in leadership perceptions were identified between junior and senior clinicians, however, very few differences were detected between the physical and mental health settings. The scores provided by participants were consistently lower than those reported for geographically relevant norms, with the majority on or close to the 40th percentile. A significant relationship was found between transformative leadership and outcomes, and a strong relationship between contingent reward and outcomes. However, the negative relationships between other leadership styles and outcomes reported in other studies were not found.
Research limitations/implications
Transformational leadership, and some aspects of transactional leadership, are used in occupational therapy. The career stage has an impact on how leadership behaviours are perceived. The MLQ-5X could enable a consistent approach to research into healthcare leadership, and the exploration of whether these findings are generalisable beyond the Australian context.
Practical implications
Career stage may be a more significant influence on leadership perception than service setting, and efforts to develop leadership in occupational therapy should focus on both transformative and transactional leadership. Perceptions of occupational leadership from all areas of the workforce are important to understand, given their potential impact on workplace behaviour, career progression, recruitment and retention.
Originality/value
This study is a partial replication of a previous study conducted in the USA, being the first to use the MLQ-5X with the Australian occupational therapy workforce. As such, it consolidates the existing evidence base in this area and also enables international comparisons of findings.
Collapse
|
11
|
Bail K, Davey R, Currie M, Gibson J, Merrick E, Redley B. Implementation pilot of a novel electronic bedside nursing chart: a mixed-methods case study. AUST HEALTH REV 2020; 44:672-676. [DOI: 10.1071/ah18231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the implementation of a novel electronic bedside nursing chart in an acute hospital setting. The case study used multiple data sources captured within a real-life clinical ward context. Quantitative findings included significant reductions in nurse-reported missed care (P<0.05) and increased mean time spent at the bedside (from 21 to 28min h−1; P<0.0001); reductions in patient-reported missed care and nurses’ walking distances were not significant. Qualitative themes included: (1) inconsistent expectations (perceptions about potential vs actual functionality and benefits of the technology); (2) decisional conflict between managers and end-user nurses (discordance between governance decisions and clinical operations; 30% of beds were closed and six of the eight trained nurse ‘super-users’ were moved from the pilot ward); and (3) workflow effects (ergonomic set-up of the digital interface). This study highlights the complex challenges of implementing and examining the effects of technology to support nursing care. Shared understanding of the technology goals and project scope in relation to nursing care and flexible and adaptive project and contingency planning are fundamental considerations. Complexity, unpredictability and uncertainty of ‘usual business’ are common confounders in acute hospital settings.
What is known about the topic?Although much has been written about the implementation of electronic records into hospital systems, there is little research evaluating the effect of information technology systems that support the complex clinical decision making and documentation required to meet nurse and patient needs at the point of care.
What does this paper add?This study highlights the potential to reduce missed care through better nursing workflow. Contributing factors to low nurse adoption of new technology have been identified, including inconsistent expectations and goals for the design of systems to support quality nursing care, incongruous decision making in design, adaptation and implementation processes and constrained physical workability in relation to nursing workflow.
What are the implications for practitioners?The design of information systems to support nursing work requires a shared understanding of ‘good practice’ for high-quality nursing care that is consistent with theories of nursing practice, best evidence and professional practice standards. Recognition of effective and ineffective sociotechnical interactions that occur during complex nursing processes can help avoid ‘disruption without benefit’ and ‘amplification of errors already in the system’ during acute care technology implementation. Ongoing dynamic input from individuals and groups with different expertise and perspectives, as well as iterative, generative processes for moving towards a shared goal, are critical for effective and efficient implementation.
Collapse
|
12
|
Squires JE, Graham I, Bashir K, Nadalin‐Penno L, Lavis J, Francis J, Curran J, Grimshaw JM, Brehaut J, Ivers N, Michie S, Hillmer M, Noseworthy T, Vine J, Demery Varin M, Aloisio LD, Coughlin M, Hutchinson AM. Understanding context: A concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 2019; 75:3448-3470. [DOI: 10.1111/jan.14165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Revised: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Janet E. Squires
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | - Ian Graham
- Clinical Epidemiology Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | - Kainat Bashir
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Letitia Nadalin‐Penno
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | - John Lavis
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
- McMaster Health Forum Hamilton Ontario Canada
| | - Jill Francis
- School of Health Sciences, City University of London London United Kingdom
| | - Janet Curran
- IWK Health Centre Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
- School of Nursing Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
| | - Jeremy M. Grimshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada
- Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | - Jamie Brehaut
- Clinical Epidemiology Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | - Noah Ivers
- Women's College Research Institute Toronto Ontario Canada
- Women's College Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Susan Michie
- Psychology Department University College London London United Kingdom
| | - Michael Hillmer
- Information Management, Data, and Analytics Ontario Ministry of Health and Long‐term Care Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Thomas Noseworthy
- British Columbia Academic Health Science Network Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - Jocelyn Vine
- School of Nursing Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
- Patient Care IWK Health Centre Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
| | - Melissa Demery Varin
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | - Laura D. Aloisio
- Clinical Epidemiology Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | - Mary Coughlin
- Clinical Epidemiology Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | - Alison M. Hutchinson
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health Deakin University Melbourne Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hitch D, Pepin G, Lhuede K, Rowan S, Giles S. Development of the Translating Allied Health Knowledge (TAHK) Framework. Int J Health Policy Manag 2019; 8:412-423. [PMID: 31441278 PMCID: PMC6706979 DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While evidence-based practice is a familiar concept to allied health clinicians, knowledge translation (KT) is less well known and understood. The need for a framework that enables allied health clinicians to access and engage with KT was identified. The aim of this paper is to describe the development of the Translating Allied Health Knowledge (TAHK) Framework. METHODS An iterative and collaborative process involving clinician and academic knowledge partners was utilised to develop the TAHK Framework. Multiple methods were utilised during this process, including a systematic literature review, steering committee consultation, mixed methods survey, benchmarking and measurement property analysis. RESULTS The TAHK Framework has now been finalised, and is described in detail. The framework is structured around four domains - Doing Knowledge Translation, Social Capital for Knowledge Translation, Sustaining Knowledge Translation and Inclusive Knowledge Translation - under which 14 factors known to influence allied health KT are classified. The formulation of the framework to date has laid a rigorous foundation for further developments, including clinician support and outcome measurement. CONCLUSION The method of development adopted for the TAHK Framework has ensured it is both evidence and practice based, and further amendments and modifications are anticipated as new knowledge becomes available. The Framework will enable allied health clinicians to build on their existing capacities for KT, and approach this complex process in a rigorous and systematic manner. The TAHK Framework offers a unique focus on how knowledge is translated by allied health clinicians in multidisciplinary settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Hitch
- Occupational Therapy, Health & Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Genevieve Pepin
- Occupational Therapy, Health & Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Kate Lhuede
- Occupational Therapy, North West Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sue Rowan
- Occupational Therapy, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Susan Giles
- Occupational Therapy, Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Developing family-centred care in a neonatal intensive care unit: An action research study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2019; 50:54-62. [DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2018.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Revised: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
15
|
Elledge C, Avworo A, Cochetti J, Carvalho C, Grota P. Characteristics of facilitators in knowledge translation: An integrative review. Collegian 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.colegn.2018.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
16
|
Andrew NE, Middleton S, Grimley R, Anderson CS, Donnan GA, Lannin NA, Stroil-Salama E, Grabsch B, Kilkenny MF, Squires JE, Cadilhac DA. Hospital organizational context and delivery of evidence-based stroke care: a cross-sectional study. Implement Sci 2019; 14:6. [PMID: 30658654 PMCID: PMC6339367 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0849-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Organizational context is one factor influencing the translation of evidence into practice, but data pertaining to patients with acute stroke are limited. We aimed to determine the associations of organizational context in relation to four important evidence-based stroke care processes. Methods This was a mixed methods cross-sectional study. Among 19 hospitals in Queensland, Australia, a survey was conducted of the perceptions of stroke clinicians about their work using the Alberta Context Tool (ACT), a validated measure covering 10 concepts of organizational context, and with additional stroke-specific contextual questions. These data were linked to the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (AuSCR) to determine the relationship with receipt of evidence-based acute stroke care (acute stroke unit admission, use of thrombolysis for those with acute ischemic stroke, receipt of a written care plan on discharge, and prescription of antihypertensive medications on discharge) using quantile regression. Exploratory cluster analysis was used to categorize hospitals into high and low context groups based on all of the 10 ACT concepts. Differences in adherence to care processes between the two groups were examined. Results A total of 215 clinicians completed the survey (50% nurses, 37% allied health staff, 10% medical practitioners), with 81% being in their current role for at least 1 year. There was good reliability (∞ 0.83) within the cohort to allow pooling of professional groups. Greater ACT scores, especially for social capital (μ 9.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.86 to 13.14) and culture (μ 7.33, 95% CI 2.05 to 12.62), were associated with more patients receiving stroke unit care. There was no correlation between ACT concepts and other care processes. Working within higher compared to lower context environments was associated with greater proportions of patients receiving stroke unit care (88.5% vs. 69.0%) and being prescribed antihypertensive medication at discharge (62.5% vs. 52.0%). Staff from higher context hospitals were more likely to value medical and/or nursing leadership and stroke care protocols. Conclusions Overall organizational context, and in particular aspects of culture and social capital, are associated with the delivery of some components of evidence-based stroke care, offering insights into potential pathways for improving the implementation of proven therapies. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-018-0849-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine E Andrew
- Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Level 3, Hudson Institute Building, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.,Department of Medicine, Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sandy Middleton
- Nursing Research Institute, St Vincent's Health Australia (Sydney) and Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rohan Grimley
- Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Level 3, Hudson Institute Building, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.,Sunshine Coast Clinical School, The University of Queensland, Birtinya and Statewide Stroke Clinical Network, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Craig S Anderson
- The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Geoffrey A Donnan
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Natasha A Lannin
- Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.,Occupational Therapy Department, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Enna Stroil-Salama
- Australian Bronchiectasis Registry, Lung Foundation Australia, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Brenda Grabsch
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Monique F Kilkenny
- Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Level 3, Hudson Institute Building, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.,Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Janet E Squires
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dominique A Cadilhac
- Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Level 3, Hudson Institute Building, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia. .,Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Australia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Beran D, Lazo-Porras M, Cardenas MK, Chappuis F, Damasceno A, Jha N, Madede T, Lachat S, Perez Leon S, Aya Pastrana N, Pesantes MA, Singh SB, Sharma S, Somerville C, Suggs LS, Miranda JJ. Moving from formative research to co-creation of interventions: insights from a community health system project in Mozambique, Nepal and Peru. BMJ Glob Health 2018; 3:e001183. [PMID: 30498592 PMCID: PMC6254743 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Revised: 09/29/2018] [Accepted: 10/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Different methodological approaches for implementation research in global health focusing on how interventions are developed, implemented and evaluated are needed. In this paper, we detail the approach developed and implemented in the COmmunity HEalth System InnovatiON (COHESION) Project, a global health project aimed at strengthening health systems in Mozambique, Nepal and Peru. This project developed innovative formative research at policy, health system and community levels to gain a comprehensive understanding of the barriers, enablers, needs and lessons for the management of chronic disease using non-communicable and neglected tropical diseases as tracer conditions. After formative research, COHESION adopted a co-creation approach in the planning of interventions. The approach included two interactions with each type of stakeholder at policy, health system and community level in each country which aimed to develop interventions to improve the delivery of care of the tracer conditions. Diverse tools and methods were used in order to prioritise interventions based on support, resources and impact. Additionally, a COHESION score that assessed feasibility, sustainability and scaling up was used to select three potential interventions. Next steps for the COHESION Project are to further detail and develop the interventions propositioned through this process. Besides providing some useful tools and methods, this work also highlights the challenges and lessons learned from such an approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Beran
- Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, University of Geneva and Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Maria Lazo-Porras
- CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.,Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Maria Kathia Cardenas
- CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - François Chappuis
- Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, University of Geneva and Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Nilambar Jha
- B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal
| | - Tavares Madede
- Faculty of Medicine, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Sarah Lachat
- Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, University of Geneva and Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Silvana Perez Leon
- CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - Nathaly Aya Pastrana
- BeCHANGE Research Group, Institute of Public Communication, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Maria Amalia Pesantes
- CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | | | - Sanjib Sharma
- B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal
| | - Claire Somerville
- Gender Centre, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - L Suzanne Suggs
- BeCHANGE Research Group, Institute of Public Communication, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.,Swiss School of Public Health, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - J Jaime Miranda
- CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.,School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Redley B, Raggatt M. Use of standard risk screening and assessment forms to prevent harm to older people in Australian hospitals: a mixed methods study. BMJ Qual Saf 2017; 26:704-713. [DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2016] [Revised: 02/07/2017] [Accepted: 02/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
19
|
Pfadenhauer LM, Gerhardus A, Mozygemba K, Lysdahl KB, Booth A, Hofmann B, Wahlster P, Polus S, Burns J, Brereton L, Rehfuess E. Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework. Implement Sci 2017; 12:21. [PMID: 28202031 PMCID: PMC5312531 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0552-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 432] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2016] [Accepted: 02/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of complex interventions, as well as their success in reaching relevant populations, is critically influenced by their implementation in a given context. Current conceptual frameworks often fail to address context and implementation in an integrated way and, where addressed, they tend to focus on organisational context and are mostly concerned with specific health fields. Our objective was to develop a framework to facilitate the structured and comprehensive conceptualisation and assessment of context and implementation of complex interventions. METHODS The Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework was developed in an iterative manner and underwent extensive application. An initial framework based on a scoping review was tested in rapid assessments, revealing inconsistencies with respect to the underlying concepts. Thus, pragmatic utility concept analysis was undertaken to advance the concepts of context and implementation. Based on these findings, the framework was revised and applied in several systematic reviews, one health technology assessment (HTA) and one applicability assessment of very different complex interventions. Lessons learnt from these applications and from peer review were incorporated, resulting in the CICI framework. RESULTS The CICI framework comprises three dimensions-context, implementation and setting-which interact with one another and with the intervention dimension. Context comprises seven domains (i.e., geographical, epidemiological, socio-cultural, socio-economic, ethical, legal, political); implementation consists of five domains (i.e., implementation theory, process, strategies, agents and outcomes); setting refers to the specific physical location, in which the intervention is put into practise. The intervention and the way it is implemented in a given setting and context can occur on a micro, meso and macro level. Tools to operationalise the framework comprise a checklist, data extraction tools for qualitative and quantitative reviews and a consultation guide for applicability assessments. CONCLUSIONS The CICI framework addresses and graphically presents context, implementation and setting in an integrated way. It aims at simplifying and structuring complexity in order to advance our understanding of whether and how interventions work. The framework can be applied in systematic reviews and HTA as well as primary research and facilitate communication among teams of researchers and with various stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M. Pfadenhauer
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ansgar Gerhardus
- Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
- Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Kati Mozygemba
- Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
- Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | | | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Bjørn Hofmann
- Centre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Philip Wahlster
- Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Stephanie Polus
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jacob Burns
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Louise Brereton
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Eva Rehfuess
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bullock A, Barnes E, Morris ZS, Fairbank J, de Pury J, Howell R, Denman S. Getting the most out of knowledge and innovation transfer agents in health care: a qualitative study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2016. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr04330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundKnowledge and innovation transfer (KIT) is recognised internationally as a complex, dynamic process that is difficult to embed in organisations. There is growing use of health service–academic–industry collaborations in the UK, with knowledge brokers linking producers with the users of knowledge and innovation.AimFocusing on KIT ‘agent’ roles within Academic Health Science Networks in England and Partnerships in Wales, we show how individual dispositions, processes and content contribute to desired outcomes.MethodsWe studied the KIT intentions of all Academic Health Science Networks in England, and the South East Wales Academic Health Science Partnership. Using a qualitative case study design, we studied the work of 13 KIT agents purposively sampled from five networks, by collecting data from observation of meetings, documentation, KIT agent audio-diaries, and semistructured interviews with KIT agents, their line managers and those they supported (‘Links’). We also used a consensus method in a meeting of experts (nominal group technique) to discuss the measurement of outcomes of KIT agent activity.FindingsThe case study KIT agents were predominantly from a clinical background with differing levels of experience and expertise, with the shared aim of improving services and patient care. Although outside of recognised career structures, the flexibility afforded to KIT agents to define their role was an enabler of success. Other helpful factors included (1) time and resources to devote to KIT activity; (2) line manager support and a team to assist in the work; and (3) access and the means to use data for improvement projects. The organisational and political context could be challenging. KIT agents not only tackled local barriers such as siloed working, but also navigated shifting regional and national policies. Board-level support for knowledge mobilisation together with a culture of reflection (listening to front-line staff), openness to challenges and receptivity to research all enabled KIT agents to achieve desired outcomes. Nominal group findings underscored the importance of relating measures to specific intended outcomes. However, the case studies highlighted that few measures were employed by KIT agents and their managers. Using social marketing theory helped to show linkages between processes, outcomes and impact, and drew attention to how KIT agents developed insight into their clients’ needs and tailored work accordingly.LimitationsLevel of KIT agent participation varied; line managers and Links were interviewed only once; and outcomes were self-reported.ConclusionsSocial marketing theory provided a framework for analysing KIT agent activity. The preparatory work KIT agents do in listening, understanding local context and building relationships enabled them to develop ‘insight’ and adapt their ‘offer’ to clients to achieve desired outcomes.Future workThe complexity of the role and the environment in which it is played out justifies more research on KIT agents. Suggestions include (1) longitudinal study of career pathways; (2) how roles are negotiated within teams and how competing priorities are managed; (3) how success is measured; (4) the place of improvement methodologies within KIT work; (5) the application of social marketing theory to comparative study of similar roles; and (6) patients as KIT agents.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Bullock
- The Cardiff Unit for Research and Evaluation in Medical and Dental Education (CUREMeDE), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Emma Barnes
- The Cardiff Unit for Research and Evaluation in Medical and Dental Education (CUREMeDE), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | | | | | - Rosamund Howell
- Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Clinical Research and Innovation Centre, St Woolos Hospital, Newport, UK
| | - Susan Denman
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Context is a problem in research on health behaviour change, knowledge translation, practice implementation and health improvement. This is because many intervention and evaluation designs seek to eliminate contextual confounders, when these represent the normal conditions into which interventions must be integrated if they are to be workable in practice. DISCUSSION We present an ecological model of the ways that participants in implementation and health improvement processes interact with contexts. The paper addresses the problem of context as it affects processes of implementation, scaling up and diffusion of interventions. We extend our earlier work to develop Normalisation Process Theory and show how these processes involve interactions between mechanisms of resource mobilisation, collective action and negotiations with context. These mechanisms are adaptive. They contribute to self-organisation in complex adaptive systems. CONCLUSION Implementation includes the translational efforts that take healthcare interventions beyond the closed systems of evaluation studies into the open systems of 'real world' contexts. The outcome of these processes depends on interactions and negotiations between their participants and contexts. In these negotiations, the plasticity of intervention components, the degree of participants' discretion over resource mobilisation and actors' contributions, and the elasticity of contexts, all play important parts. Understanding these processes in terms of feedback loops, adaptive mechanisms and the practical compromises that stem from them enables us to see the mechanisms specified by NPT as core elements of self-organisation in complex systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl R May
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Building 67 (Nightingale), University Road, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. .,University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK. .,NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
| | - Mark Johnson
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.,NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust and University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Tracy Finch
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Context is a problem in research on health behaviour change, knowledge translation, practice implementation and health improvement. This is because many intervention and evaluation designs seek to eliminate contextual confounders, when these represent the normal conditions into which interventions must be integrated if they are to be workable in practice. DISCUSSION We present an ecological model of the ways that participants in implementation and health improvement processes interact with contexts. The paper addresses the problem of context as it affects processes of implementation, scaling up and diffusion of interventions. We extend our earlier work to develop Normalisation Process Theory and show how these processes involve interactions between mechanisms of resource mobilisation, collective action and negotiations with context. These mechanisms are adaptive. They contribute to self-organisation in complex adaptive systems. CONCLUSION Implementation includes the translational efforts that take healthcare interventions beyond the closed systems of evaluation studies into the open systems of 'real world' contexts. The outcome of these processes depends on interactions and negotiations between their participants and contexts. In these negotiations, the plasticity of intervention components, the degree of participants' discretion over resource mobilisation and actors' contributions, and the elasticity of contexts, all play important parts. Understanding these processes in terms of feedback loops, adaptive mechanisms and the practical compromises that stem from them enables us to see the mechanisms specified by NPT as core elements of self-organisation in complex systems.
Collapse
|
23
|
Identifying the domains of context important to implementation science: a study protocol. Implement Sci 2015; 10:135. [PMID: 26416206 PMCID: PMC4584460 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0325-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2015] [Accepted: 09/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is growing recognition that "context" can and does modify the effects of implementation interventions aimed at increasing healthcare professionals' use of research evidence in clinical practice. However, conceptual clarity about what exactly comprises "context" is lacking. The purpose of this research program is to develop, refine, and validate a framework that identifies the key domains of context (and their features) that can facilitate or hinder (1) healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice and (2) the effectiveness of implementation interventions. METHODS/DESIGN A multi-phased investigation of context using mixed methods will be conducted. The first phase is a concept analysis of context using the Walker and Avant method to distinguish between the defining and irrelevant attributes of context. This phase will result in a preliminary framework for context that identifies its important domains and their features according to the published literature. The second phase is a secondary analysis of qualitative data from 13 studies of interviews with 312 healthcare professionals on the perceived barriers and enablers to their application of research evidence in clinical practice. These data will be analyzed inductively using constant comparative analysis. For the third phase, we will conduct semi-structured interviews with key health system stakeholders and change agents to elicit their knowledge and beliefs about the contextual features that influence the effectiveness of implementation interventions and healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice. Results from all three phases will be synthesized using a triangulation protocol to refine the context framework drawn from the concept analysis. The framework will then be assessed for content validity using an iterative Delphi approach with international experts (researchers and health system stakeholders/change agents). DISCUSSION This research program will result in a framework that identifies the domains of context and their features that can facilitate or hinder: (1) healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice and (2) the effectiveness of implementation interventions. The framework will increase the conceptual clarity of the term "context" for advancing implementation science, improving healthcare professionals' use of evidence in clinical practice, and providing greater understanding of what interventions are likely to be effective in which contexts.
Collapse
|