Late potentials abolition reduces ventricular tachycardia recurrence after ablation especially in higher-risk patients with a chronic total occlusion in an infarct-related artery

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Endpoints: Moving Beyond Noninducibility

In patients with structural heart disease and ventricular tachycardia (VT) undergoing catheter ablation, the response to programmed electrical stimulation (PES) at the end of the procedure has been traditionally used to evaluate the acute success and predict long-term outcomes. Although noninducibility at PES has been extensively investigated and validated in clinical trials and large multicenter registries, its performance in predicting long-term freedom from VT is suboptimal. In addition, PES has inherent limitations related to the influence of background antiarrhythmic drug therapy, periprocedural use of anesthesia, and the heterogeneity in PES protocols. The increased utilization of substrate-based ablation approaches that focus on ablation of abnormal electrograms identified with mapping in sinus or paced rhythm has been paralleled by a need for additional procedural endpoints beyond VT noninducibility at PES. This article critically appraises the relative merits and limitations of different procedural endpoints according to different ablation techniques for catheter ablation of scar-related VT.

Sex differences on outcomes of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease: A real-world systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Sex differences have diversely affected cardiac diseases. Little is known whether these differences impact outcomes of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT).

Objectives

To assess the impact of sex differences on outcomes of catheter ablation of VT.

Methods

Databases were searched from inception through December 2021. Effect estimates from individual studies were extracted and combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird. The outcomes of interest included VT recurrence rates, all-cause mortality, and composite outcomes of mortality, left ventricular assistant device use, and heart transplantation following VT ablation.

Results

Our analysis included 22 observational studies. There were 10,206 patients, of which 12.8% were women. We found no statistical difference between sexes for VT recurrence rate (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 1.04, P = .57, I ² = 14.9%). Similarly, there was statistical difference in neither all-cause mortality nor composite outcomes (pooled HR 0.93, P = .75, I ² = 59.1% and pooled HR 0.9, P = .33, I ² = 0%, respectively). There was a trend toward an increase in women undergoing VT ablation in the recent registries (P = .071).

Conclusion

Our contemporary analysis suggests that sex may have no impact on clinical outcomes of catheter ablation of VT in patients with structural heart disease, though women are the underrepresented. However, recent VT ablation registries have involved more women in their studies. Future studies with a higher proportion of women are encouraged to verify the current perception.

Mid-Term Outcome of Ventricular Arrhythmias Catheter Ablation in Patients with Chronic Coronary Total Occlusion Compared to Ischemic and Non-Ischemic Patients

Chronic coronary total occlusions (CTO) are considered an emerging predictor of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), but currently there are few data on arrhythmic outcomes in patients affected by CTO undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation of VAs. This study sought to evaluate the impact of unrevascularized CTO on the recurrence of VAs after catheter ablation. This was a single-center retrospective study enrolling 120 patients between 2015 and 2020. All patients were admitted for ventricular tachycardia (VT) or high premature ventricular contractions burden (>25% detected by Holter ECG), without evidence of acute coronary syndrome; they underwent coronary angiography, electrophysiology (EP) study, and three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (3D-EAM) followed by VAs ablation. Twenty-eight patients (23%) of 120 patients showed CTO at coronary angiography. At baseline, the CTO group presented with higher prevalence of hypertension, chronic renal disease, systolic ventricular dysfunction, secondary prevention ICD implantation, and higher rate of LAVA by 3D-EAM compared with the non-CTO group. At a median follow-up of 15 months (range 1−96 months) after catheter ablation, the only independent predictor of VAs recurrence was the presence of moderate to severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Therefore, the presence of CTO does not predict VAs recurrence after catheter ablation, which is instead predicted by LV dysfunction.

Significance of abnormal and late ventricular signals in ventricular tachycardia ablation of ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies

BACKGROUND

Abnormal ventricular signals (AVS) are the cornerstone of substrate-based ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in sinus rhythm. Signal characterization of AVS in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies has never been performed.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe ventricular signal abnormalities in 3 different pathologies and examine their association with the diastolic component of VT circuits.

METHODS

A total of 45 patients (15 ischemic cardiomyopathy [ICM], 15 arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy [ACM], 15 dilated cardiomyopathy [DCM]) who had undergone VT ablation with >50% of the diastolic pathway of the VT circuit recorded were studied. AVS were classified into late potentials (LPs) and continuous fractionated ventricular signals (CFVS), and their characteristics and correlation with the diastolic pathway of VT circuits were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy-five VT circuits were analyzed. Bipolar scars were greatest in ICM endocardially (53 cm² ICM vs 36 cm² ACM vs 25 cm² DCM; P = .010) and in ACM epicardially (98 cm² ACM vs 25 cm² ICM vs 24 cm² DCM; P = .005). Location of the VT diastolic interval coincided with AVS location in 54% of VTs in ICM, 89% in ACM, and 72% in DCM (P = .036). There was a trend toward a greater association of diastolic intervals coinciding with LPs than with CFVS (78% vs 57%; P = .052) (69% diastolic intervals in ICM coincided with LPs, 33% with CFVS; P = .063). All patients (100%) with CFVS in ACM had VT diastolic components arising from CFVS (33% ICM, 64% DCM; P = .049). Positive predictive value for LPs vs CFVS was 77.8% vs 56.7%, and sensitivity was 67.3% vs 32.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The nature of abnormal signals in different cardiomyopathies reflects underlying pathology. LPs rather than CFVS seem to be more linked to diastolic components of VT circuits, especially in ICM. LPs have greater sensitivity and specificity for VT; however, CFVS may be of more relevance in ACM.

Contemporary approach to catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in nonischemic cardiomyopathy

Nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) comprises a heterogenous group of disorders with myocardial dysfunction unrelated to significant coronary disease. As the use of implantable defibrillators has increased in this patient population, catheter ablation is being utilized more frequently to treat NICM patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT). Progress has been made in identifying multiple subtypes of NICM with variable scar patterns. The distribution of scar is often mid-myocardial and subepicardial, and identifying and ablating this substrate can be challenging. Here, we will review the current understanding of NICM subtypes and the outcomes of VT ablation in this population. We will discuss the use of cardiac imaging, electrocardiography, and electroanatomic mapping to define the VT substrate and the ablation techniques required to successfully prevent VT recurrence.

Relevance of Chronic Total Occlusion for Outcome of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Background

Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) is an effective tool to prevent VT recurrences. Chronic total occlusion (CTO) represents a clinically relevant entity in ICM patients and is an independent predictor of ventricular arrhythmia and mortality. The effects of CTO on the outcome of VT ablation are not well-studied.

Objective

This analysis aimed to identify the impact of CTO, revascularized, or not revascularized, on the outcome of VT ablation.

Methods and Results

Of 385 consecutive subjects with ICM-VT who underwent catheter VT ablation for monomorphic VT at Heart Center Leipzig between 2008 and 2017, 108 patients without CTO and 191 patients with CTO were included in the analysis. Within a median follow-up time of 557 days (IQR 149, 1095), VT recurred in 77 (40%) patients in the CTO and 40 (37.0%) in the non-CTO cohort (p = 0.62). In a multivariable model, a 10% stepwise change in LVEF as well as ICD on admission was associated with VT recurrence (HR_adj 1.82, 95% CI 1.04–3.18 and HR_adj 1.35, 95% CI 1.23–1.61, respectively). Of the CTO cohort before ablation, 45% had received revascularization, which was independently associated with a higher risk for VT recurrence (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.35–3.34) as compared to nonrevascularized CTO.

Conclusion

In ICM patients with and without CTO, VT ablation was associated with equal effectiveness with regard to VT recurrence. However, in revascularized CTO patients, the risk of recurrence of VT after ablation was significantly increased.

Late Potential Abolition in Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate-based ablation has become the gold standard treatment for patients with structural heart disease-related VT. VT is linked to re-entry in relation to myocardial scarring, with areas of conduction block (core scar) and of slow conduction (border zone). Slow conduction areas can be detected in sinus rhythm as late potentials (LPs). LP abolition has been shown to be the best end point to avoid long-term recurrences. Our study aimed to analyze the challenges of LP abolition and the predictors of failure. We analyzed 169 consecutive patients with structural heart disease (61% ischemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular ejection fraction: 37 ± 13%) who underwent VT ablation between 2013 and 2018. A preprocedural clinical evaluation, including cardiac magnetic resonance, was done in 66% of patients. Electroanatomical mapping with the identification of LPs was performed in all patients. Noninducibility was achieved in 71% (119), and complete LP abolition was achieved in 61% (103) of patients. Incomplete LP abolition was a powerful predictor of VT recurrence (67% vs 33%, hazard ratio 3.19 [2.1 to 4.7]; p <0.001). Lack of use of a high-density mapping catheter (odds ratio 6.2, 1.2 to 38.1; p = 0.028), the septal substrate (odds ratio 9.34, 2.27 to 38.4; p = 0.002), and larger left ventricular mass (190 ± 58 g vs 156 ± 46 g, p = 0.002) were predictors of incomplete LP abolition. The main reasons that contributed to unsuccessful LP abolition were anatomic obstacles (such as the conduction system) and large extension of the LP area. In conclusion, incomplete LP abolition is related to VT recurrence. Lack of use of a high-density mapping catheter, the septal substrate, and larger left ventricular mass are related to incomplete LP abolition.

HeartMate 3: new challenges in ventricular tachycardia ablation

AIM

To describe clinical characteristics, procedural details, specific challenges, and outcomes in patients with HeartMate3™ (HM3), a left ventricular assist device system with a magnetically levitated pump, undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation (VTA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data were collected from patients with an HM3 system who underwent VTA in seven tertiary centres. Data included baseline patient characteristics, procedural data, mortality, and arrhythmia-free survival. The study cohort included 19 patients with cardiomyopathy presenting with ventricular tachycardia (VT) (53% with VT storm). Ventricular tachycardias were induced in 89% of patients and a total of 41 VTs were observed. Severe electromagnetic interference was present on the surface electrocardiogram. Hence, VT localization required analysis of intra-cardiac signals or the use of filter in the 40-20 Hz range. The large house pump HM3 design obscured the cannula inflow and therefore multi imaging modalities were necessary to avoid catheter entrapment in the cannula. A total of 32 VTs were mapped and were successfully ablated (31% to the anterior wall, 38% to the septum and only 9% to the inflow cannula region). Non-inducibility of any VT was reached in 11 patients (58%). Over a follow-up of 429 (interquartile range 101-692) days, 5 (26%) patients underwent a redo VT ablation due to recurrent VTA and 2 (11%) patients died.

CONCLUSIONS

Ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with HM3 is feasible and safe when done in the appropriate setup. Long-term arrhythmia-free survival is acceptable but not well predicted by non-inducibility at the end of the procedure.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Factors associated with recurrent postinfarction ventricular tachycardia following ablation

INTRODUCTION

Ablation of ventricular tachycardia is the main therapy for patients with drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). Although evidence suggests that VT ablation could lower the incidence of recurrent VT, many cases still develop VT in follow-up. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine risk factors for recurrent VT in patients with postinfarction VT who underwent VT ablation.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to March 2020. Included studies were cohort studies, experimental trials, or randomized controlled trials that evaluate the risk of recurrent VT in postinfarction VT patients who underwent VT ablation. Data from each study were combined using random-effects.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Thirteen studies involving 1803 postinfarction patients who underwent VT ablation were included. Inducibility after the procedure (pooled HR=1.71, P<0.001), lower baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (pooled HR=0.98, P<0.001) and higher baseline New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification (pooled HR=1.34, P=0.003) were significantly associated with VT recurrence during the follow-up. There was no significant association between age, gender or diabetes mellitus and VT recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that inducibility after the procedure, lower baseline LVEF and higher baseline NYHA classification were associated with an increased risk of VT recurrence in postinfarction VT patients who underwent VT ablation.

Fundamentals of Cardiac Mapping

To characterize cardiac activity and arrhythmias, electrophysiologists can record the electrical activity of the heart in relation to its anatomy through a process called cardiac mapping (electroanatomic mapping, EAM). A solid understanding of the basic cardiac biopotentials, called electrograms, is imperative to construct and interpret the cardiac EAM correctly. There are several mapping approaches available to the electrophysiologist, each optimized for specific arrhythmia mechanisms. This article provides an overview of the fundamentals of EAM.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.