Impact of the inflammation on the outcomes of catheter ablation of drug‐refractory ventricular tachycardia in cardiac sarcoidosis

SCMR expert consensus statement for cardiovascular magnetic resonance of patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a proven imaging modality for informing diagnosis and prognosis, guiding therapeutic decisions, and risk stratifying surgical intervention. Patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) would be expected to derive particular benefit from CMR given high prevalence of cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia. While several guidelines have been published over the last 16 years, it is important to recognize that both the CIED and CMR technologies, as well as our knowledge in MR safety, have evolved rapidly during that period. Given increasing utilization of CIED over the past decades, there is an unmet need to establish a consensus statement that integrates latest evidence concerning MR safety and CIED and CMR technologies. While experienced centers currently perform CMR in CIED patients, broad availability of CMR in this population is lacking, partially due to limited availability of resources for programming devices and appropriate monitoring, but also related to knowledge gaps regarding the risk-benefit ratio of CMR in this growing population. To address the knowledge gaps, this SCMR Expert Consensus Statement integrates consensus guidelines, primary data, and opinions from experts across disparate fields towards the shared goal of informing evidenced-based decision-making regarding the risk-benefit ratio of CMR for patients with CIEDs.

Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: strategies to improve outcomes

Catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias has evolved considerably since it was first described more than 3 decades ago. Advancements in understanding the underlying substrate, utilizing pre-procedural imaging, and evolving ablation techniques have improved the outcomes of catheter ablation. Ensuring safety and efficacy during catheter ablation requires adequate planning, including analysis of the 12 lead ECG and appropriate pre-procedural imaging. Defining the underlying arrhythmogenic substrate and disease eitology allow for the developed of tailored ablation strategies, especially for patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. During ablation, the type of anesthesia can affect VT induction, the quality of the electro-anatomic map, and the stability of the catheter during ablation. For high risk patients, appropriate selection of hemodynamic support can increase the success of VT ablation. For patients in whom VT is hemodynamically unstable or difficult to induce, substrate modification strategies can aid in safe and successful ablation. Recently, there has been an several advancements in substrate mapping strategies that can be used to identify and differentiate local late potentials. The incorporation of high-definition mapping and contact-sense technologies have both had incremental benefits on the success of ablation procedures. It is crucial to harness newer technology and ablation strategies with the highest level of peri-procedural safety to achieve optimal long-term outcomes in patients undergoing VT ablation.

Clinical predictors and implications of cardiac inflammation detected on positron emission tomography (PET) in patients referred for premature ventricular complex (PVC) ablation

BACKGROUND

Positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) is not routinely used for premature ventricular complexes (PVCs). Whether specific clinical factors are associated with abnormal PET-CT results is not clear.

METHODS

The treatment courses and baseline characteristics of consecutive patients in a single center between 2012 and 2021, age > 18 years old, and who received ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-CT imaging for evaluation of PVCs were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients was included. Of these, 27 patients (26.4%) had abnormal PET-CT and 61 (59.8%) had normal imaging. Abnormal PET-CT findings were associated with non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) (95.2% vs. 52.6%, p = 0.001), higher number of PVC morphologies (2.29 ± 0.7 vs. 1.31 ± 0.6, p < 0.001), greater PVC coupling interval dispersion (72.47 ± 66.4 ms vs. 13.42 ± 17.9 ms, p < 0.001), and greater likelihood of fast heart rate dependent PVCs (78.5% vs. 38.2%, p = 0.017). Fourteen (51.8%) patients had an abnormal PET-CT and abnormal late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Patients with abnormal PET-CT were more frequently treated with immunosuppression (81.4% vs. 3.2%, p < .0001) than with catheter ablation (11.1% vs. 45.9%, p = 0.002) compared to the normal PET-CT group. Over a median follow-up of 862 days (IQR 134, 1407), PVC burden decreased in both groups [from 23 ± 16% to 9 ± 10% (p < 0.001) in abnormal PET-CT group and from 21 ± 15% to 7 ± 10% (p < 0.001) in normal PET-CT group].

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal PET-CT findings were more commonly associated with NSVT, multiform PVCs, greater PVC coupling interval dispersion, and fast heart rate dependent PVCs. LGE was not sensitive for detecting inflammation. Immunosuppression was effective in managing PVCs with abnormal PET-CT.

Patient Selection, Techniques, and Complication Mitigation for Epicardial Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

Percutaneous epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation can decrease implanted cardioverter defibrillator shocks and hospitalizations; proper patient selection and procedural technique are imperative to maximize the benefit-risk ratio. The best candidates for epicardial ventricular tachycardia will depend on history of prior ablation, type of cardiomyopathy, and specific electrocardiogram and cardiac imaging findings. Complications include hemopericardium, hemoperitoneum, coronary vessel injury, and phrenic nerve injury. Modern epicardial mapping techniques provide new understandings of the 3-dimensional nature of reentrant ventricular tachycardia circuits across cardiomyopathy etiologies. Where epicardial access is not feasible, alternative techniques to reach epicardial ventricular tachycardia sources may be necessary.

Outcomes of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in patients with sarcoidosis: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample database (2002-2018)

INTRODUCTION

Data on utilization, major complications, and in-hospital mortality of catheter ablation (CA) for sarcoidosis-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) are limited. We sought to determine the outcomes of sarcoidosis-related VT, and incidence and predictors of complications associated with the CA procedure.

METHODS

We queried the 2002-2018 National Inpatient Sample database to identify patients aged ≥18 years with sarcoidosis admitted with VT. A 1:3 propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was used to compare patient outcomes between CA and medically managed groups. Multivariable regression was performed to determine independent predictors of in-hospital mortality and procedural complications associated with the CA procedure.

RESULTS

Of 3220 sarcoidosis patients with VT, 132 (4.1%) underwent CA. Patients who underwent CA were younger, male predominant, more likely Caucasian, had differences in baseline comorbidities including more likely to have heart failure, less likely to have prior myocardial infarction, COPD, or severe renal disease, had a higher mean household income, and more likely admitted to a larger/urban teaching hospital. After PSM, we examined 106 CA cases and 318 medically managed cases. There was a trend toward a lower in-hospital mortality rate in the CA group when compared to the medically managed group (1.9% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.08). The most common complications were pericardial drainage (5.3%), postoperative hemorrhage (3.8%), accidental puncture periprocedure (3.0%), and cardiac tamponade (2.3%). Independent predictors of in-hospital mortality and procedural complications among the CA group included congestive heart failure (odds ratio [OR], 13.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-104.2) and mild to moderate renal disease (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.1-13.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to patients with sarcoidosis-related VT who received medical therapy alone, those who underwent CA have a trend for a lower mortality rate despite procedure-related complications occurring as high as 9.1%. Additional studies are recommended to better evaluate the benefits and risks of VT ablation in this group.

Detection of inflammation using cardiac positron emission tomography for evaluation of ventricular arrhythmias: An institutional experience

BACKGROUND

The use of cardiac positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is increasingly used for the detection of underlying inflammation in patients with ventricular arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation [VT/VF]), but the role of PET-CT remains undefined, particularly for patients who do not meet Task Force criteria for sarcoidosis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of PET-CT for clinical evaluation of VT/VF in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and VT/VF who underwent cardiac PET-CT to detect inflammation between 2012 and 2019 were analyzed for baseline demographic characteristics, imaging results, and outcomes. Patients with known sarcoidosis or other conditions requiring immunosuppressive therapy were excluded.

RESULTS

PET-CT was performed in 133 patients with mean age 56.3 ± 13.5 years and left ventricular ejection fraction 43% ± 16.1%, with evidence of myocardial inflammation detected in 32 (23.5%). Patients with myocardial inflammation were managed conservatively with medical therapy including immunosuppressive agents. Ten patients with myocardial inflammation ultimately required catheter ablation for ongoing arrhythmias. There was no significant difference in arrhythmia recurrence between PET-positive and PET-negative groups (37.5% vs 32.4%; P = .43) or in time to recurrence (P = .26), in spite of the disparate management strategies. Gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 96 patients (72%); however, magnetic resonance imaging did not detect 31% of cases with active inflammation that were otherwise detected on PET-CT.

CONCLUSION

The use of PET-CT significantly improves the detection of underlying myocardial inflammation contributing to ventricular arrhythmias. Management of these patients with immunosuppressive medical therapy is effective for arrhythmia control and may obviate the need for invasive ablation procedures in some patients.

Improving Outcomes in Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Using Imaging to Identify Arrhythmic Substrates

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation is limited by modest acute and long-term success rates, in part due to the challenges in accurately identifying the arrhythmogenic substrate. The combination of multimodality imaging along with information from electroanatomic mapping allows for a more comprehensive assessment of the arrhythmogenic substrate which facilitates VT ablation, and the use of preprocedural imaging has been shown to improve long-term ablation outcomes. Beyond regional recognition of the arrhythmogenic substrate, advanced imaging techniques can be used to create tailored ablation strategies preprocedurally. This review will focus on how imaging can be used to guide ablation planning and execution with a focus on clinical applications aimed at improving the outcome of VT ablation procedures.

Evaluation and Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Ventricular arrhythmias are a common clinical manifestation in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and other arrhythmogenic inflammatory cardiomyopathies (AIC). The management of sustained ventricular arrhythmias in these patients presents unique challenges. Current therapies include immunosuppressive, antiarrhythmic agents, and catheter ablation. Significant progress has been made in deciphering the importance of patient selection for ablation, systematic preablation evaluation, and optimal ablation timing, as well as ablation approaches and techniques. In this overview, we discuss the evaluation and management of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with CS, focusing on catheter ablation, which has evolved into an effective approach in reducing the burden of ventricular arrhythmias in these patients in the context of multifaceted treatment along with medical therapies.

Meta-Analysis of Catheter Ablation Outcomes in Patients With Cardiac Sarcoidosis Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) frequently leads to ventricular tachycardia (VT), which is often refractory to antiarrhythmic and/or immunosuppressive medications and requires catheter ablation. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of catheter ablation in patients with refractory VT undergoing catheter ablation. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from their inception to December 31, 2021 with search terms "cardiac sarcoidosis" AND "electrophysiological studies OR ablation." Fifteen studies were ultimately included for evaluation. Patient demographics, VT mapping, and acute and long-term procedural outcomes were extracted. A total of 15 studies were included in our meta-analysis, with a total of 401 patients, of whom 66% were male, with ages ranging from 39 to 64 years. A total of 95% of patients were on antiarrhythmics and 79% of patients were on immunosuppressants. Left ventricular ejection fraction ranged from 35% to 49% and procedure duration ranged from 269 to 462 minutes. Ablation was reported using both irrigated and nonirrigated catheter tips. A total of 25% of patients (84/339) underwent repeat ablation. Acute procedural success was achieved in 57% (161/285). Procedure complications occurred in 5.7% (17/297) procedures. VT recurrence after first ablation was 55% (confidence interval 48% to 63%, 213/401); VT recurrence after multiple ablations was 37% (81/220). The composite end point of death, heart transplant, and left ventricular assist device implantation was 21% (confidence interval 14% to 30%, 55/297). In conclusion, catheter ablation is a useful modality in patients with CS with refractory VT. However, patients with CS presenting with refractory VT after undergoing VT ablation carry a poor prognosis.

Outcomes Associated With Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Importance

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is associated with high mortality in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), and medical management of CS-associated VT is limited by high failure rates. The role of catheter ablation has been investigated in small, single-center studies.

Objective

To investigate outcomes associated with VT ablation in patients with CS.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study from the Cardiac Sarcoidosis Consortium registry (2003-2019) included 16 tertiary referral centers in the US, Europe, and Asia. A total of 158 consecutive patients with CS and VT were included (33% female; mean [SD] age, 52 [11] years; 53% with ejection fraction [EF] <50%).

Exposures

Catheter ablation of CS-associated VT and, as appropriate, medical treatment.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Immediate and short-term outcomes included procedural success, elimination of VT storm, and reduction in defibrillator shocks. The primary long-term outcome was the composite of VT recurrence, heart transplant (HT), or death.

Results

Complete procedural success (no inducible VT postablation) was achieved in 85 patients (54%). Sixty-five patients (41%) had preablation VT storm that did not recur postablation in 53 (82%). Defibrillator shocks were significantly reduced from a median (IQR) of 2 (1-5) to 0 (0-0) in the 30 days before and after ablation (P < .001). During median (IQR) follow-up of 2.5 (1.1-4.9) years, 73 patients (46%) experienced VT recurrence and 81 (51%) experienced the composite primary outcome. One- and 2-year rates of survival free of VT recurrence, HT, or death were 60% and 52%, respectively. EF less than 50% and myocardial inflammation on preprocedural 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography were significantly associated with adverse prognosis in multivariable analysis for the primary outcome (HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.37-3.64; P = .001 and HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.31-6.55; P = .009, respectively). History of hypertension was associated with a favorable long-term outcome (adjusted HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28-0.92; P = .02).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this observational study of selected patients with CS and VT, catheter ablation was associated with reductions in defibrillator shocks and recurrent VT storm. Preablation LV dysfunction and myocardial inflammation were associated with adverse long-term prognosis. These data support the role of catheter ablation in conjunction with medical therapy in the management of CS-associated VT.

Clinical Presentation and Treatment of High-Risk Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disease of unknown cause with heterogenous clinical manifestations and variable course. Spontaneous remissions occur in some patients while others have progressive disease impacting survival, organ function, and quality of life. Four high-risk sarcoidosis phenotypes associated with chronic inflammation have recently been identified as high-priority areas for research. These include treatment-refractory pulmonary disease, cardiac sarcoidosis, neurosarcoidosis and multiorgan sarcoidosis. Significant gaps currently exist in understanding of these high-risk manifestations of sarcoidosis, including their natural history, diagnostic criteria, biomarkers, and the treatment strategy such as the ideal agent, optimal dose and treatment duration. The use of registries with well-phenotyped patients is a critical first step to study high-risk sarcoidosis manifestations systematically. We review the diagnostic and treatment approach to high-risk sarcoidosis manifestations. Appropriately identifying these disease sub-groups will help enroll well-phenotyped patients in sarcoidosis registries and clinical trials, a necessary step to narrow existing gaps in understanding of this enigmatic disease.

Management of ventricular tachycardia in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease with 2 different phases (inflammation and scar). In the current era of targeted use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and modern heart failure therapy, recent data indicate the prognosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is much improved, and hence more patients are presenting with recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT). This review highlights our current understanding of the pathophysiology and management of ventricular arrhythmias in CS with the major focus on indications, techniques, and outcomes of ablation. It is likely macroreentry phenomena around areas of fibrosis is the most frequent mechanism of ventricular arrhythmia in CS. It is also possible that inflammation may play a role in initiating reentry with ventricular ectopy in CS patients, or by slowing conduction in diseased tissue. The best available data would suggest annual rates of VT of perhaps 1%-2% and 10%-15% in patients with initially clinically silent and clinically manifest disease, respectively. Current guidelines recommend a stepwise approach to VT management. The first suggested step is treatment with immunosuppression if there is evidence of active inflammation. Antiarrhythmic medications are often started at the same time, with catheter ablation considered if VT cannot be controlled. Activation and entrainment mapping and ablation are favored in the setting of hemodynamically tolerated VT. Substrate ablation targets areas of abnormal electrogram and favorable pace mapping using linear and/or cluster lesion sets with the goal of abolishing critical isthmuses and/or blocking VT exit sites. Epicardial mapping ablation is required in 20%-35% of cases. In general, more morphologies of VT are induced (often 3-4) and subsequent outcomes (recurrence rates 40%-50%) are less favorable than in other forms of nonischemic cardiomyopathy. The prognosis of CS is much improved and, as a result, more patients are developing VT during follow-up. Likely principally related to the complex disease substrate, VT ablation is technically challenging, with moderate outcomes, and much remains to be learned.

Arrhythmias Associated with Inflammatory Cardiomyopathies

Purpose of review

To provide an approach to the diagnosis and treatment of arrhythmias associated with inflammatory cardiomyopathies.

Recent findings

Inflammatory cardiomyopathies are increasingly recognized as the etiology of both ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias. There have been recent studies providing novel insights into the pathogenesis of arrhythmias in inflammatory cardiomyopathies and exploring the role of various diagnostic tools and treatment strategies.

Summary

Patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathies often present with one or more arrhythmias, including atrioventricular block, atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and occasionally sudden cardiac death. Given dynamic pathophysiology and heterogeneous presentation, the management of arrhythmias in these patients presents unique challenges. We review the current approach to the diagnosis and treatment of arrhythmias in this challenging cohort of patients with an emphasis on cardiac sarcoidosis.

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11936-020-00871-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.