A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Cost of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with Monitored Anesthesia Care vs General Anesthesia

General Anesthesia Improves Efficiency of High-Power Short-Duration Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison with Mild Conscious Sedation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia globally. High-power, short-duration radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation (CA) for AF has recently emerged, reducing ablation times and enhancing patient tolerability with comparable efficacy and safety. While the benefits of general anesthesia (GA) for standard-power, standard-duration CA are well-established, data comparing GA to mild conscious sedation (MCS) for high-power, short-duration CA are limited.

METHODS

We included patients undergoing high-power, short-duration CA for AF under GA (group 1) or MCS (group 2). Procedural characteristics, success rates, and mid-term outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 131 patients, 47 in the GA group and 84 in the MCS group, were included. CA was performed for paroxysmal AF in 34 patients in group 1 (72.3%) and 68 patients in group 2 (80.9%). We found lower a mean total procedure time (100 [90-120] vs. 160 [130-180] min, p < 0.0001), lower radiation exposure (932.5 [625-1716] vs. 2445 [1228-4791] μGy, p < 0.0001 and 4.5 [3-7.1] 7.3 [4.2-13.5] min, p = 0.0003) and fewer RF applications (71 [54.8-83.8] vs. 103 [88.5-120.5], p < 0.0001) in the GA group. No major complications occurred. The 6-month AF recurrence rate was comparable between the groups (21.2% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.15).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing high-power, short-duration RFCA for AF, the use of GA is associated with better procedural efficiency while simultaneously associated with an early recurrence rate comparable to MCS.

Investigating Deep Sedation With Intravenous Ketamine in Spontaneous Respiration During Pulsed-Field Ablation

OBJECTIVES

The authors report their experience of a protocol for deep sedation with ketamine in spontaneous respiration during the pulsed-field ablation (PFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF).

DESIGN

Observational, prospective, nonrandomized fashion.

SETTING

Single-center hospitalized patients.

PARTICIPANTS

All consecutive patients undergoing PFA of AF.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients undergoing deep sedation with intravenous ketamine.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The authors' sedation protocol involves the intravenous administration of fentanyl (1.5 µg/kg) and midazolam (2 mg) at low doses before local anesthesia with lidocaine. A ketamine adjunct (1 mg/kg) in 5-minute boluses was injected about 5 minutes before the first PFA delivery. The authors enrolled 117 patients (age = 59 ± 10 y, 74.4% males, body mass index = 27.6 ± 5 kg/m2, fluoroscopy time = 24 ± 14 minutes, skin-to-skin time = 80 ± 40 minutes and PFA LA dwell time = 24 ± 7 minutes). By the end of the procedure, pulmonary vein isolation had been achieved in all patients using PFA alone. The mean time under sedation was 54.9 ± 6 minutes, with 92 patients (79%) being sedated for <1 hour. A satisfactory Ramsay Sedation Scale level before ketamine administration was achieved in all patients, except one (80.3% of the patients with rank 3; 18.4% with rank 2). In all procedures, the satisfaction level was found acceptable by both the patient and the primary operator (satisfactory in 98.2% of cases). All patients achieved a Numeric Rating Scale for Pain ≤3 (none or mild). No major procedure or anesthesia-related complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

The authors' standardized sedation protocol with the administration of drugs with rapid onset and pharmacologic offset at low doses was safe and effective, with an optimal degree of patient and operator satisfaction.

Sedation strategies for pulsed-field ablation of atrial fibrillation: focus on deep sedation with intravenous ketamine in spontaneous respiration

AIMS

A standardized sedation protocol for pulsed-field ablation (PFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) through irreversible cellular electroporation has not been well established. We report our experience of a protocol for deep sedation with ketamine in spontaneous respiration during the PFA of AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All consecutive patients undergoing PFA for AF at our center were included. Our sedation protocol involves the intravenous administration of fentanyl (1.5 mcg/kg) and midazolam (2 mg) at low doses before local anesthesia with lidocaine. A ketamine adjunct (1 mg/kg) was injected about 5 minutes before the first PFA delivery. We enrolled 66 patients (age = 59 ± 9 years, 78.8% males, body mass index = 28.8 ± 5 kg/m2, fluoroscopy time = 21[15-30] min, skin-to-skin time = 75[60-100] min and PFA LA dwell time = 25[22-28] min). By the end of the procedure, PVI had been achieved in all patients by means of PFA alone. The mean time under sedation was 56.4 ± 6 min, with 50 (76%) patients being sedated for less than 1 hour. A satisfactory Ramsey Sedation Scale level before ketamine infusion was achieved in all patients except one (78.8% of the patients with rank 3; 19.7% with rank 2). In all procedures, the satisfaction level was found to be acceptable by both the patient and the primary operator (Score = 0 in 98.5% of cases). All patients reported none or mild pain. No major procedure or anesthesia-related complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

Our standardized sedation protocol with the administration of drugs with rapid onset and pharmacological offset at low doses was safe and effective, with an optimal degree of patient and operator satisfaction.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Advanced TecHnologies For SuccEssful AblatioN of AF in Clinical Practice (ATHENA). URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/Identifier: NCT05617456.

Active esophageal cooling during radiofrequency ablation of the left atrium: data review and update

INTRODUCTION

Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the left atrium of the heart is increasingly used to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). Unfortunately, inadvertent thermal injury to the esophagus can occur during this procedure, potentially creating an atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) which is 80% fatal. The ensoETM (Attune Medical, Chicago, IL), is an esophageal cooling device that has been shown to reduce thermal injury to the esophagus during RF ablation.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes growing evidence related to active esophageal cooling during RF ablation for the treatment of AF. The review presents data demonstrating improved outcomes related to patient safety and procedural efficiency and suggests directions for future research.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of active esophageal cooling during RF ablation reduces esophageal injury, reduces or eliminates fluoroscopy requirements, reduces procedure duration and post-operative pain, and increases long-term freedom from arrhythmia. These effects in turn increase patient same-day discharge rates, decrease operator cognitive load, and reduce cost. These findings are likely to further accelerate the adoption of active esophageal cooling.