Associations of short- and long-term mortality with admission blood pressure in Chinese patients with different heart failure subtypes

Blood pressure levels and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Existing data on the association between blood pressure levels and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) are inconsistent. The optimal blood pressure targets for patients with HF remain uncertain. This study sought to assess the associations between blood pressure (systolic [SBP] and diastolic blood pressure [DBP]) levels and adverse cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes in patients with HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to 5 May 2023. The outcomes of interest included adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Forty-three unique observational cohort studies, comprising 120 643 participants with HF, were included. The pooled RRs (95% CIs) for SBP thresholds of ≥140 mmHg versus <140 mmHg were 0.92 (0.83-1.01) for all-cause mortality, 0.83 (0.67-1.04) for CVD death, and 0.98 (0.80-1.21) for HF hospitalization. The pooled RR (95% CI) for SBP thresholds of ≥160 mmHg versus <160 mmHg and all-cause mortality was 0.67 (0.62-0.74). SBP levels below <130, <120, and <110 mmHg were each associated with an increased risk of various cardiovascular endpoints and all-cause mortality. The pooled RR (95% CI) for DBP thresholds of ≥80 mmHg versus <80 mmHg and all-cause mortality was 0.86 (0.67-1.10). A 10 mmHg increase in SBP or DBP was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality and other cardiovascular endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that lower and normal baseline SBP levels (<130, <120, and <110 mmHg) may be associated with future risk of worse outcomes in patients with HF. Optimal baseline blood pressure levels for these patients may lie within the range of ≥140 mmHg for SBP. In the absence of observational studies with repeated blood pressure measurements or definitive trials evaluating optimal blood pressure targets, individualized blood pressure targets based on patients' unique circumstances are warranted in HF management.

Prognostic Implication of Admission Mean and Pulse Pressure in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure With Different Phenotypes

BACKGROUND

It remains unknown whether admission mean (MAP) and pulse pressure (PP) pressure are associated with short- and long-term mortality in Chinese patients with heart failure with preserved (HFpEF), mid-range (HFmrEF), and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction.

METHODS

In 2,706 acute decompensated heart failure (HF) patients, we assessed the risk of 30-day, 1-year, and long-term (>1 year) mortality with 1-SD increment in MAP and PP, using multivariable logistic and Cox regression, respectively.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 4.1 years, 1,341 patients died. The 30-day, 1-year, and long-term mortality were 3.5%, 16.7%, and 39.4%, respectively. A lower MAP was associated with a higher risk of 30-day mortality in women (P = 0.023) and a higher risk of 30-day and 1-year mortality in men (P ≤ 0.006), while higher PP predicted long-term mortality in men (P ≤ 0.014) with no relationship observed in women. In adjusted analyses additionally accounted for PP, 1-SD increment in MAP was associated with 30-day mortality in HFpEF (odds ratio [OR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.92; P = 0.018), with 1-year mortality in HFmrEF (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.66; P < 0.001) and HFrEF (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.72; P < 0.001). In the adjusted model additionally accounted for MAP, 1-SD increment in PP was associated with long-term mortality in HFpEF (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.28; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

A lower MAP was associated with a higher risk of short-term mortality in all HF subtypes, while a higher PP predicted a higher risk of long-term mortality in men and in HFpEF. Our observations highlight the clinical importance of admission blood pressure for risk stratification in HF subtypes.

Associations of short- and long-term mortality with admission blood pressure in Chinese patients with different heart failure subtypes

It remains unknown whether systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) pressure on admission are associated with short- and long-term mortality in Chinese patients with heart failure with preserved (HFpEF), mildly reduced (HFmrEF), and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction. In 2706 HF patients (39.1% women; mean age, 68.8 years), we assessed the risk of 30-day, 1-year, and long-term (> 1 year) mortality with 1-SD increment in SBP and DBP, using multivariable logistic and Cox regression, respectively. During a median follow-up of 4.1 years, 1341 patients died. The 30-day, 1-year, and long-term mortality were 3.5%, 16.7%, and 39.4%, respectively. In multivariable-adjusted analyses additionally accounted for DBP or SBP, a higher SBP conferred a higher risk of long-term mortality (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.22; p = .017) and a lower DBP was associated with a higher risk of all types of mortality (p ≤ .011) in all HF patients. Independent of potential confounders including DBP or SBP, in patients with HFpEF, higher SBP and lower DBP levels predicted a higher risk of long-term mortality with hazard ratios amounting to 1.16 (95% CI, 1.04-1.29; p = .007) and .89 (95% CI, .80-.99; p = .028), respectively. In patients with HFmrEF and HFrEF, irrespective of adjustments of potential confounders, DBP was associated with 1-year mortality with odds ratios ranging from .49 to .62 (p ≤ .006). In conclusion, lower DBP and higher SBP levels on admission were associated with a higher risk of different types of all-cause mortality in Chinese patients with different HF subtypes. Our observations highlight that admission BP may help to improve risk stratification.