Anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction induced by rituximab infusion: A case report and review of the literature

Safety and Tolerability of Rituximab in the Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis

Rituximab (RTX) has been used for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSс) for a long time and has shown good efficacy for skin fibrosis and interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, data on tolerability and long-term adverse events (AEs) during RTX therapy in SSc are insufficient. The objective of this study was to assess the tolerability and safety of RTX in patients with SSс in a long-term prospective follow-up. Our open-label prospective study included 151 SSс patients who received at least one RTX infusion. The mean age of the patients was 47.9 ± 13.4 years; the majority of them were women (83%). The mean disease duration was 6.4 ± 5.8 years. The mean follow-up period after the first RTX infusion was 5.6 ± 2.6 years (845.6 patient-years (PY)). All patients received RTX in addition to ongoing therapy with prednisone and/or immunosuppressants. AEs were assessed and recorded by a doctor in the hospital immediately after RTX infusion and then by patient's reported outcome during the observation period. All causes of death were considered, regardless of treatment. A total of 85 AEs (56%) were registered, the overall incidence of AEs was 10/100 PY (95% confidence interval (CI) 8-12). The highest frequency of all AEs was observed in the first 2-6 months after the first course of RTX, however, these were mainly mild and moderate AEs (71%). The most frequent AEs were infections, they were observed in 40% of cases, with no serious opportunistic infections reported. The overall incidence of all infections was 7.1/100 PY (95% CI 5.5-9), serious infections-1.5/100 PY (95% CI 0.9-2.6). Infusion reactions occurred in 8% of patients. Other AEs were noted in 3% (0.6/100 PY, 95% CI 0.3-1.4). The overall incidence of serious AEs was 18%-3.2/100 PY (95% CI 2.2-4.6). There was a significant decrease of the immunoglobulin G (Ig G) during follow-up; however, its average values remained within normal limits. There were 17 deaths (11%) (2/100 PY, 95% CI 1.3-3.2). In most cases, patients died from the progression of the major organ failure, which arose before RTX treatment. In our study, the safety profile of RTX in SSс was assessed as favorable. It was similar to the AE profile in other autoimmune diseases treated with RTX. With an increase in the cumulative dose of RTX, no increase in AEs was observed. The mortality is comparable to the other severe autoimmune diseases in observational studies. Monitoring of IgG may be useful for patients with SSс on RTX therapy for early detection of the risk of developing infectious complications. RTX could be considered as a relatively safe drug for the complex therapy of SSс when standard therapy is ineffective or impossible.

A practical guide to the management of immune thrombocytopenia co-existing with acute coronary syndrome

Introduction

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) management with co-existing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains challenging as it requires a clinically relevant balance between the risk and outcomes of thrombosis and the risk of bleeding. However, the literature evaluating the treatment approaches in this high-risk population is scarce.

Methods and Results

In this review, we aimed to summarize the available literature on the safety of ITP first- and second-line therapies to provide a practical guide on the management of ITP co-existing with ACS. We recommend holding antithrombotic therapy, including antiplatelet agents and anticoagulation, in severe thrombocytopenia with a platelet count < 30 × 109/L and using a single antiplatelet agent when the platelet count falls between 30 and 50 × 109/L. We provide a stepwise approach according to platelet count and response to initial therapy, starting with corticosteroids, with or without intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) with a dose limit of 35 g, followed by thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) to a target platelet count of 200 × 109/L and then rituximab.

Conclusion

Our review may serve as a practical guide for clinicians in the management of ITP co-existing with ACS.

Metabolic Abnormalities, Cardiovascular Disease, and Metabolic Syndrome in Adult Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Current Perspectives and Clinical Implications

AIM

Rheumatoid arthritis is a prevalent worldwide disease, associated with an increased risk of multiple metabolic abnormalities that generate a higher disease burden.

OBJECTIVE

To gather the available evidence on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, current perspectives, clinical implications and prognosis of metabolic abnormalities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

This is a narrative literature review. Search was conducted in PubMed, OVID, and Taylor & Francis databases, using the following MeSH terms: "Arthritis Rheumatoid", "Metabolic Diseases", and "Metabolic Syndrome".

RESULTS

This study describes the main metabolic manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis. Research has recognized that rheumatoid arthritis and metabolic abnormalities share pathophysiological mechanisms with an additive effect that increases cardiovascular risk. In that context, appropriate antirheumatic treatment can also impact on cardiovascular risk.

CONCLUSION

There are metabolic abnormalities in rheumatoid arthritis patients that increase cardiovascular risk. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate cardiovascular risk to provide appropriate comprehensive management to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with this disease.

Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis Anno 2022

The risk for developing cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients is 1.5 times higher compared to the general population. This risk is partly due to the contribution of systemic inflammation in increased atherogenesis, while an increased prevalence of "traditional" cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension and dyslipidemia, is also attributed to nearly 50% of the total CVD risk. Most anti-rheumatic medication partly reduces this CVD risk, primarily by reducing inflammation. The increased risk is recognized by most guidelines, which advise consequent screening and multiplying calculated risk scores by 1.5. However, screening in daily clinical practice is poorly done, and RA patients often have undiagnosed and untreated risk factors. In conclusion, even nowadays, RA patients still have an increased risk of developing CVD. Advances in anti-inflammatory treatment partly mitigate this risk, but RA patients need mandatory screening for CV risk factors to turn their CVD risk towards that of the general population.

Refractory Statin-Induced Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myositis: Challenges and Perils in Its Management

Statin or 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) inhibitor is widely used and plays a vital role in the management of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Statin is generally safe and its side effects are mostly mild and self-limiting. Immune-mediated necrotizing myositis (IMNM) is a rare and serious side effect characterized by the presence of anti-HMGCR inhibitor and myositis. Long-term immunosuppressive therapy is often required to manage it, and in refractory cases, the treatment can be very challenging. We report the case of a 55-year-old female with underlying diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia who developed refractory statin-induced IMNM despite being administered prednisolone, methotrexate, azathioprine, and immunoglobulin. After the introduction of rituximab, steroids were able to be tapered down to the lowest maintenance dose. Unfortunately, the patient subsequently succumbed to severe coronary artery disease (CAD) likely caused by the long-term steroid therapy, highlighting the difficulty and complications associated with the treatment of IMNM, especially in patients with cardiovascular risk factors.

Effect of Anti-Rheumatic Drugs on Cardiovascular Disease Events in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by erosive arthritis, which can involve multiple systems. Patients with RA may have a variety of comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease (CVD), lung cancer, lymphoma, infection, osteoporosis, fatigue, depression, colon cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, and Alzheimer's disease. Among these comorbidities, the incidence of CVD, lung cancer, lymphoma, infection, and osteoporosis is higher. CVD is a serious complication of RA. The risk of CVD and associated mortality rate in patients with RA is high, and the treatment rate is low. In addition to traditional risk factors, such as age, sex, blood pressure, and diabetes, RA is also associated with inflammation. Furthermore, therapeutic drugs for RA, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, have beneficial or harmful effects on cardiovascular events in patients with RA. This article discusses the effects of therapeutic drugs for RA on cardiovascular events.

Cardiovascular effects of approved drugs for rheumatoid arthritis

The risk of cardiovascular disease is increased in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with the general population owing to the influence of traditional and non-traditional risk factors. Inflammation has a pivotal contribution and can accelerate the atherosclerotic process. Although dampening inflammation with DMARDs should theoretically abrogate this process, evidence suggests that these drugs can also promote atherosclerosis directly and indirectly, hence adding to an increased cardiovascular burden. However, the extent and direction of the effects largely differ across drugs. Understanding how these drugs influence endothelial damage and vascular repair mechanisms is key to understanding these outcomes. NSAIDs and glucocorticoids can increase the cardiovascular risk. Conversely, conventional, biologic and targeted DMARDs control inflammation and reduce this risk, although some of these drugs can also aggravate traditional factors or thrombotic events. Given these data, the fundamental objective for clinicians should be disease control, in an individualized approach that considers the most appropriate drug for each patient, taking into account joint and cardiovascular outcomes. This Review provides a comprehensive analysis of the effects of DMARDs and other approved drugs on cardiovascular involvement in rheumatoid arthritis, from a clinical and mechanistic perspective, with a roadmap to inform the research agenda.

Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma): remaining challenges

Despite progress in treating internal organ involvement in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) (SSc), such as pulmonary disease, effective treatments for the hallmark of the disease, cutaneous fibrosis, remain elusive. None of the disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDS) have shown proven efficacy for SSc skin fibrosis, and there remain no FDA-approved medications, all of which are off-label, for cutaneous fibrosis in SSc. This review article will briefly summarize conventional therapies, biologics and hematopoietic stem cell transplants and select ongoing clinical trials in SSc. The gold standard for measuring skin fibrosis in SSc is the modified Rodnan skin score (MRSSS). This is a validated test that measures skin thickness (0 to 3) at 17 locations for a total score of 51. Improvements in skin score over time are used in clinical trials to quantitate skin fibrosis. Although recording the Rodnan skin score is technically straightforward, requiring no special equipment, and noninvasive, the fluctuating natural history of the disease includes improvement over time without interventions, rendering meaningful trials difficult to assess. Understanding of the basic molecular mechanisms driving pathologic fibrosis in SSc remains lacking, and underpins the often empiric nature and likely the lack of efficacy of many therapeutics that have been tried. Although repeated skin biopsies might be a more precise way to follow disease progression and regression, this is necessarily invasive and requires special tools. Here, this review will look at conventional therapies, biologics, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and catalog some of the ongoing clinical trials in SSc with a focus on cutaneous fibrosis.

Cardiovascular disease after transplantation: an emerging role of the immune system

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) after transplantation remains a major concern. Little is known about what drives the increased cardiovascular risk in transplant recipients apart from traditional risk factors. The immune system is involved in the pathogenesis of hypertension, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease in the general population. Recently, inhibition of interleukin 1 - β by canakinumab versus placebo decreased the incidence of cardiovascular events. Emerging evidence points to a role of adaptive cellular immunity in the development of CVD. Especially, expansion of pro-inflammatory and antiapoptotic cytotoxic CD4⁺ CD28^null T cells is closely associated with incident CVD in various study populations including transplant recipients. The association of cytomegalovirus exposure with increased cardiovascular mortality might be explained by its capacity to upregulate these cytotoxic cells. Also, humoral immunity seems to be relevant for cardiovascular outcome in transplant recipients. Panel-reactive antibodies at baseline and donor-specific antibodies are independently associated with poor cardiovascular outcome after kidney transplantation. Cardiovascular effects of immunosuppressive drugs and statins do not only imply indirect positive or negative effects on traditional cardiovascular risk factors but also intrinsic immunological effects. How immunosuppressive drugs modify atherosclerosis largely remains elusive.

Cancer chemotherapeutics in rheumatoid arthritis: A convoluted connection

Chemotherapy is one of the most popular therapeutic strategies to treat cancer. However, cancer chemotherapeutics have often been associated with impairment of the immune system, which might consequently lead to an augmented risk of autoimmune disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis. Though the accurate mechanistic facets of rheumatoid arthritis induction have not been interpreted yet, a conglomeration of genetic and environmental factors might promote its etiology. What makes the scenario more challenging is that patients with rheumatoid arthritis are at a significantly elevated risk of developing various types of cancer. It is intriguing to note that diverse cancer chemotherapy drugs are also commonly used to treat symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis. However, a colossal multitude of such cancer therapeutics has demonstrated highly varied results in rheumatoid arthritis patients, including both beneficial and adverse effects. Herein, we attempt to present a holistic account of the variegated modalities of this complex tripartite cross-talk between cancer, rheumatoid arthritis and chemotherapy drugs in order to decode the sinuous correlation between these two appalling pathological conditions.