1
|
Zhang W, Wang L, Zhu N, Wu W, Liu H. A prospective, randomized, single-blinded study comparing the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. BMC Anesthesiol 2024; 24:191. [PMID: 38807059 PMCID: PMC11131278 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02572-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Balanced propofol sedation is extensively used in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), but sedation-related adverse events (SRAEs) are common. In various clinical settings, the combination of dexmedetomidine with opioids and benzodiazepines has provided effective sedation with increased safety. The aim of this investigation was to compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation during ERCP. METHODS Forty-one patients were randomly divided into two groups: the dexmedetomidine (DEX) group and the propofol (PRO) group. Patients in the DEX group received an additional bolus of 0.6 μg kg-1 dexmedetomidine followed by a dexmedetomidine infusion at 1.2 μg kg-1 h-1, whereas the PRO group received 1-2 mg kg-1 of propofol bolus followed by a propofol infusion at 2-3 mg kg-1 h-1. During ERCP, the primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia (SpO2 < 90% for > 10 s). Other intraoperative adverse events were also recorded as secondary outcomes, including respiratory depression (respiratory rate of < 10 bpm min-1), hypotension (MAP < 65 mmHg), and bradycardia (HR < 45 beats min-1). RESULTS The incidence of hypoxemia was significantly reduced in the DEX group compared to the PRO group (0% versus 28.6%, respectively; P = 0.032). Patients in the PRO group exhibited respiratory depression more frequently than patients in the DEX group (35% versus 81%, respectively; P = 0.003). There were no significant differences in terms of hypotension and bradycardia episodes between groups. During the procedures, the satisfaction scores of endoscopists and patients, as well as the pain and procedure memory scores of patients were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION In comparison with propofol, dexmedetomidine provided adequate sedation safety with no adverse effects on sedation efficacy during ERCP. TRIAL REGISTRATION Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200061468, 25/06/2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenyou Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Ouhai District, Shangcai Village, Nanbaixiang Town, Wenzhou, 325000, China
| | - Liangrong Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Ouhai District, Shangcai Village, Nanbaixiang Town, Wenzhou, 325000, China
| | - Na Zhu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Ouhai District, Shangcai Village, Nanbaixiang Town, Wenzhou, 325000, China
| | - Wenzhi Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China
| | - Haiyan Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Ouhai District, Shangcai Village, Nanbaixiang Town, Wenzhou, 325000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Akazawa Y, Ohtani M, Namikawa S, Nosaka T, Takahashi K, Naito T, Ofuji K, Matsuda H, Hiramatsu K, Nakamoto Y. Severe necrotizing pancreatitis immediately after non-abdominal surgery under general anesthesia with propofol. Clin J Gastroenterol 2021; 14:1798-1803. [PMID: 34436725 DOI: 10.1007/s12328-021-01504-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Postoperative pancreatitis is a relatively rare disease and is poorly recognized. Herein, we present a case of necrotizing pancreatitis that developed immediately after non-abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. In this report, 4 h after thyroidectomy under general anesthesia using propofol, the patient developed upper abdominal pain and was diagnosed with severe acute pancreatitis with extensive pancreatic necrosis. Immediately after the diagnosis, the patient received appropriate treatment, and acute pancreatitis was improved. Subsequently, the patient has the formation of non-infectious giant walled-off necrosis and remained in good condition without additional treatment for 1.5 years after pancreatitis onset. In this case report, our detailed causative search suggested that propofol administration could be the cause of this pancreatitis. Propofol-induced pancreatitis is extremely rare but develops often severely, resulting in fatality. In this case, the patient developed severe acute pancreatitis within a very short time after surgery but was able to survive by immediate intervention of treatment. We suggest that clinicians should consider acute pancreatitis as a life-threatening adverse event under general anesthesia with propofol and perform thorough postoperative management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Akazawa
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji-cho, Fukui, Yoshida-gun, 910-1193, Japan
| | - Masahiro Ohtani
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji-cho, Fukui, Yoshida-gun, 910-1193, Japan
| | - Shoichi Namikawa
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji-cho, Fukui, Yoshida-gun, 910-1193, Japan
| | - Takuto Nosaka
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji-cho, Fukui, Yoshida-gun, 910-1193, Japan
| | - Kazuto Takahashi
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji-cho, Fukui, Yoshida-gun, 910-1193, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Naito
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji-cho, Fukui, Yoshida-gun, 910-1193, Japan
| | - Kazuya Ofuji
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji-cho, Fukui, Yoshida-gun, 910-1193, Japan
| | - Hidetaka Matsuda
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji-cho, Fukui, Yoshida-gun, 910-1193, Japan
| | - Katsushi Hiramatsu
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji-cho, Fukui, Yoshida-gun, 910-1193, Japan
| | - Yasunari Nakamoto
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji-cho, Fukui, Yoshida-gun, 910-1193, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Propofol is a widely used sedative for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. Drug-induced pancreatitis is a relatively rare disease possibly because of poor recognition. Propofol-induced pancreatitis is an extremely rare phenomenon. We present a 22-year-old healthy man who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy with propofol as a sedative. Soon after, he developed acute upper gastrointestinal symptoms and was diagnosed with pancreatitis. His prolonged hospital course was complicated with necrotizing pancreatitis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, septic shock, and other end-organ damages. We hope to increase awareness of a life-threatening adverse event of a commonly used anesthetic such as propofol.
Collapse
|
4
|
Wolfe D, Kanji S, Yazdi F, Barbeau P, Rice D, Beck A, Butler C, Esmaeilisaraji L, Skidmore B, Moher D, Hutton B. Drug induced pancreatitis: A systematic review of case reports to determine potential drug associations. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0231883. [PMID: 32302358 PMCID: PMC7164626 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A current assessment of case reports of possible drug-induced pancreatitis is needed. We systematically reviewed the case report literature to identify drugs with potential associations with acute pancreatitis and the burden of evidence supporting these associations. METHODS A protocol was developed a priori (PROSPERO CRD42017060473). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and additional sources to identify cases of drug-induced pancreatitis that met accepted diagnostic criteria of acute pancreatitis. Cases caused by multiple drugs or combination therapy were excluded. Established systematic review methods were used for screening and data extraction. A classification system for associated drugs was developed a priori based upon the number of cases, re-challenge, exclusion of non-drug causes of acute pancreatitis, and consistency of latency. RESULTS Seven-hundred and thirteen cases of potential drug-induced pancreatitis were identified, implicating 213 unique drugs. The evidence base was poor: exclusion of non-drug causes of acute pancreatitis was incomplete or poorly reported in all cases, 47% had at least one underlying condition predisposing to acute pancreatitis, and causality assessment was not conducted in 81%. Forty-five drugs (21%) were classified as having the highest level of evidence regarding their association with acute pancreatitis; causality was deemed to be probable or definite for 19 of these drugs (42%). Fifty-seven drugs (27%) had the lowest level of evidence regarding an association with acute pancreatitis, being implicated in single case reports, without exclusion of other causes of acute pancreatitis. DISCUSSION Much of the case report evidence upon which drug-induced pancreatitis associations are based is tenuous. A greater emphasis on exclusion of all non-drug causes of acute pancreatitis and on quality reporting would improve the evidence base. It should be recognized that reviews of case reports, are valuable scoping tools but have limited strength to establish drug-induced pancreatitis associations. REGISTRATION CRD42017060473.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dianna Wolfe
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Salmaan Kanji
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pharmacy, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fatemeh Yazdi
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pauline Barbeau
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle Rice
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Beck
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Claire Butler
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leila Esmaeilisaraji
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Becky Skidmore
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Moher
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian Hutton
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Greene RA, Zullo AR, Mailloux CM, Berard-Collins C, Levy MM, Amass T. Effect of Best Practice Advisories on Sedation Protocol Compliance and Drug-Related Hazardous Condition Mitigation Among Critical Care Patients. Crit Care Med 2020; 48:185-191. [PMID: 31939786 PMCID: PMC8840326 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine whether best practice advisories improved sedation protocol compliance and could mitigate potential propofol-related hazardous conditions. DESIGN Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING Two adult ICUs at two academic medical centers that share the same sedation protocol. PATIENTS Adults 18 years old or older admitted to the ICU between January 1, 2016, and January 31, 2018, who received a continuous infusion of propofol. INTERVENTIONS Two concurrent best practice advisories built in the electronic health record as a clinical decision support tool to enforce protocol compliance with triglyceride and lipase level monitoring and mitigate propofol-related hazardous conditions. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The primary outcomes were baseline and day 3 compliance with triglyceride and lipase laboratory monitoring per protocol and time to discontinuation of propofol in the setting of triglyceride and/or lipase levels exceeding protocol cutoffs. A total of 1,394 patients were included in the study cohort (n = 700 in the pre-best practice advisory group; n = 694 in the post-best practice advisory group). In inverse probability weighted regression analyses, implementing the best practice advisory was associated with a 56.6% (95% CI, 52.6-60.9) absolute increase and a 173% relative increase (risk ratio, 2.73; 95% CI, 2.45-3.04) in baseline laboratory monitoring. The best practice advisory was associated with a 34.0% (95% CI, 20.9-47.1) absolute increase and a 74% (95% CI, 1.39-2.19) relative increase in day 3 laboratory monitoring after inverse probability weighted analyses. Among patients with laboratory values exceeding protocol cutoffs, implementation of the best practice advisory resulted in providers discontinuing propofol an average of 16.6 hours (95% CI, 4.8-28.3) sooner than pre-best practice advisory. Findings from alternate analyses using interrupted time series were consistent with the inverse probability weighted analyses. CONCLUSIONS Best practice advisories can be effectively used in ICUs to improve sedation protocol compliance and may mitigate potential propofol-related hazardous conditions. Best practice advisories should undergo continuous quality assurance and optimizations to maximize clinical utility and minimize alert fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Greene
- Department of Pharmacy, Lifespan-Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI
| | - Andrew R Zullo
- Department of Pharmacy, Lifespan-Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
- Center of Innovation in Long-Term Services and Supports, Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI
| | - Craig M Mailloux
- Operational Excellence, Lifespan Corporate Services, Providence, RI
| | | | - Mitchell M Levy
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital and Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Timothy Amass
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital and Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Haffar S, Kaur RJ, Garg SK, Hyder JA, Murad MH, Abu Dayyeh BK, Bazerbachi F. Acute pancreatitis associated with intravenous administration of propofol: evaluation of causality in a systematic review of the literature. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2019; 7:13-23. [PMID: 30792862 PMCID: PMC6375349 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goy038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Revised: 08/04/2018] [Accepted: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis (AP) associated with intravenous administration of propofol has been described with unknown causal relation. We therefore assessed this causality in a systematic review. Multiple databases were searched on 16 August 2017; studies were appraised and selected by two reviewers based on a priori criteria. Propofol causality was evaluated with the Naranjo scale and Badalov classification. We identified 18 studies from 11 countries with a total of 21 patients, and the majority had adequate methodological quality. The median age was 35 years (range, 4-77) and 10 (48%) were males. Overall, propofol was administrated in 8 patients as sedative along with induction/maintenance of anesthesia in 13 patients; median dose was 200 mg, with intermediate latency (1-30 days) in 14 (67%). Serum triglycerides were >1000 mg/dL in four patients. Severe AP was observed in four patients (19%). AP recurrence occurred in one out of two patients who underwent rechallenge. Mortality related to AP was 3/21(14%). Propofol was the probable cause of AP according to the Naranjo scale in 19 patients (89%). Propofol-induced AP has a probable causal relation and evidence supports Badalov class Ib. Hypertriglyceridemia is not the only mechanism by which propofol illicit AP. Propofol-induced AP was severe in 19% of patients with a mortality rate related to AP of 14%. Future research is needed to delineate whether this risk is higher if combined with other procedures that portend inherent risk of pancreatitis such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir Haffar
- Digestive Center for Diagnosis & Treatment, 29 Ayar Street, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic
| | - Ravinder Jeet Kaur
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sushil Kumar Garg
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Joseph A Hyder
- Division of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - M Hassan Murad
- Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Barham K Abu Dayyeh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Fateh Bazerbachi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Metabolic Profiles of Propofol and Fospropofol: Clinical and Forensic Interpretative Aspects. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2018; 2018:6852857. [PMID: 29992157 PMCID: PMC5994321 DOI: 10.1155/2018/6852857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Revised: 03/27/2018] [Accepted: 04/15/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Propofol is an intravenous short-acting anesthetic widely used to induce and maintain general anesthesia and to provide procedural sedation. The potential for propofol dependency and abuse has been recognized, and several cases of accidental overdose and suicide have emerged, mostly among the health professionals. Different studies have demonstrated an unpredictable interindividual variability of propofol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics with forensic and clinical adverse relevant outcomes (e.g., pronounced respiratory and cardiac depression), namely, due to polymorphisms in the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase and cytochrome P450 isoforms and drugs administered concurrently. In this work the pharmacokinetics of propofol and fospropofol with particular focus on metabolic pathways is fully reviewed. It is concluded that knowing the metabolism of propofol may lead to the development of new clues to help further toxicological and clinical interpretations and to reduce serious adverse reactions such as respiratory failure, metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, cardiac bradyarrhythmias, hypotension and myocardial failure, anaphylaxis, hypertriglyceridemia, renal failure, hepatomegaly, hepatic steatosis, acute pancreatitis, abuse, and death. Particularly, further studies aiming to characterize polymorphic enzymes involved in the metabolic pathway, the development of additional routine forensic toxicological analysis, and the relatively new field of ‘‘omics” technology, namely, metabolomics, can offer more in explaining the unpredictable interindividual variability.
Collapse
|