Genotype‐guided warfarin therapy: Still of only questionable value two decades on

Cardiovascular Pharmacogenetics: From Discovery of Genetic Association to Clinical Adoption of Derived Test

Recent breakthroughs in human genetics and in information technologies have markedly expanded our understanding at the molecular level of the response to drugs, i.e., pharmacogenetics (PGx), across therapy areas. This review is restricted to PGx for cardiovascular (CV) drugs. First, we examined the PGx information in the labels approved by regulatory agencies in Europe, Japan, and North America and related recommendations from expert panels. Out of 221 marketed CV drugs, 36 had PGx information in their labels approved by one or more agencies. The level of annotations and recommendations varied markedly between agencies and expert panels. Clopidogrel is the only CV drug with consistent PGx recommendation (i.e., "actionable"). This situation prompted us to dissect the steps from discovery of a PGx association to clinical translation. We found 101 genome-wide association studies that investigated the response to CV drugs or drug classes. These studies reported significant associations for 48 PGx traits mapping to 306 genes. Six of these 306 genes are mentioned in the corresponding PGx labels or recommendations for CV drugs. Genomic analyses also highlighted the wide between-population differences in risk allele frequencies and the individual load of actionable PGx variants. Given the high attrition rate and the long road to clinical translation, additional work is warranted to identify and validate PGx variants for more CV drugs across diverse populations and to demonstrate the utility of PGx testing. To that end, pre-emptive PGx combining genomic profiling with electronic medical records opens unprecedented opportunities to improve healthcare, for CV diseases and beyond. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Despite spectacular breakthroughs in human molecular genetics and information technologies, consistent evidence supporting PGx testing in the cardiovascular area is limited to a few drugs. Additional work is warranted to discover and validate new PGx markers and demonstrate their utility. Pre-emptive PGx combining genomic profiling with electronic medical records opens unprecedented opportunities to improve healthcare, for CV diseases and beyond.

QPGx-CARES: Qatar pharmacogenetics clinical applications and research enhancement strategies

Pharmacogenetic (PGx)-informed medication prescription is a cutting-edge genomic application in contemporary medicine, offering the potential to overcome the conventional "trial-and-error" approach in drug prescription. The ability to use an individual's genetic profile to predict drug responses allows for personalized drug and dosage selection, thereby enhancing the safety and efficacy of treatments. However, despite significant scientific and clinical advancements in PGx, its integration into routine healthcare practices remains limited. To address this gap, the Qatar Genome Program (QGP) has embarked on an ambitious initiative known as QPGx-CARES (Qatar Pharmacogenetics Clinical Applications and Research Enhancement Strategies), which aims to set a roadmap for optimizing PGx research and clinical implementation on a national scale. The goal of QPGx-CARES initiative is to integrate PGx testing into clinical settings with the aim of improving patient health outcomes. In 2022, QGP initiated several implementation projects in various clinical settings. These projects aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of PGx testing, gather valuable insights into the effective dissemination of PGx data to healthcare professionals and patients, and identify the gaps and the challenges for wider adoption. QPGx-CARES strategy aimed to integrate evidence-based PGx findings into clinical practice, focusing on implementing PGx testing for cardiovascular medications, supported by robust scientific evidence. The current initiative sets a precedent for the nationwide implementation of precision medicine across diverse clinical domains.

Efficacy and safety of genotype-guided warfarin dosing versus non-genotype-guided warfarin dosing strategies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 27 randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of genotype-guided dosing (GD) strategies compared to non-genotype-guided dosing (non-GD) strategies for warfarin.

METHODS

Databases were searched up to July 2021. Meta-analysis was conducted with the Review Manager software (version 5.4) and R (version 4.0.5). Risk ratio (RR), mean difference (MD), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on ethnicity and dosing regimen in non-GD group. Meta-regression was performed to evaluate the relation of covariates. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021245654).

RESULTS

27 randomized controlled trials with a total of 9906 patients were included. The GD group resulted in a significantly improved time in therapeutic range compared with non-GD group in follow-up duration within 30 days (MD: 5.95, 95%CI: 2.41-9.22, P = 0.001) and beyond 30 days (MD: 4.93, 1.40-8.47, P = 0.006), time to the first therapeutic international normalized ratio (MD: -1.80, -2.69 - -0.92, P < 0.0001), and time to reach stable dose (MD: -5.08, -7.09 - -3.07, P < 0.00001), incidence of major bleeding events (RR: 0.50, 0.33-0.75, P = 0.0008), total bleeding events (RR: 0.83, 0.73-0.95, P = 0.006), and thromboembolism (RR: 0.69, 0.49-0.96, P = 0.03). No differences were found in stable dose achievement, minor bleeding events, over anticoagulation, and all-cause mortality. Four improved efficacy outcomes were observed in GD group compared with fixed dosing group. Only time to the therapeutic INR was shortened in GD group compared with clinical adjusted dosing group. The result showed no difference of safety outcomes between GD group and fixed dosing group whereas a decreased incidence of major bleeding events was observed when comparing to clinical adjusted dosing group.

CONCLUSION

GD strategy was superior to fixed dosing strategy in term of efficacy outcomes and comparable to fixed dosing strategy in safety outcomes. Clinical adjusted regimen could partly substitute the genotype-guided dosing strategy for efficacy in insufficient conditions, but the risk of major bleeding events should be monitored.

Impact of genetic and non-genetic factors on hepatic CYP2C9 expression and activity in Hungarian subjects

CYP2C9, one of the most abundant hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes, is involved in metabolism of 15–20% of clinically important drugs (warfarin, sulfonylureas, phenytoin, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs). To avoid adverse events and/or impaired drug-response, CYP2C9 pharmacogenetic testing is recommended. The impact of CYP2C9 polymorphic alleles (CYP2C9*2, CYP2C9*3) and phenoconverting non-genetic factors on CYP2C9 function and expression was investigated in liver tissues from Caucasian subjects (N = 164). The presence of CYP2C9*3 allele was associated with CYP2C9 functional impairment, and CYP2C9*2 influenced tolbutamide 4′-hydroxylase activity only in subjects with two polymorphic alleles, whereas the contribution of CYP2C8*3 was not confirmed. In addition to CYP2C9 genetic polymorphisms, non-genetic factors (co-medication with CYP2C9-specific inhibitors/inducers and non-specific factors including amoxicillin + clavulanic acid therapy or chronic alcohol consumption) contributed to the prediction of hepatic CYP2C9 activity; however, a CYP2C9 genotype–phenotype mismatch still existed in 32.6% of the subjects. Substantial variability in CYP2C9 mRNA levels, irrespective of CYP2C9 genotype, was demonstrated; however, CYP2C9 induction and non-specific non-genetic factors potentially resulting in liver injury appeared to modify CYP2C9 expression. In conclusion, complex implementation of CYP2C9 genotype and non-genetic factors for the most accurate estimation of hepatic CYP2C9 activity may improve efficiency and safety of medication with CYP2C9 substrate drugs in clinical practice.

Influence of CYP2C9, VKORC1, and CYP4F2 polymorphisms on the pharmacodynamic parameters of warfarin: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Warfarin is the most commonly evaluated drug in pharmacogenetic-guided dosing studies. However, gaps remain regarding the influence of the genetic polymorphisms of CYP2C9, VKORC1, and CYP4F2 on specific pharmacodynamic parameters like the warfarin sensitivity index (WSI), prothrombin time international normalized ratio (PT-INR), and log-INR variability.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in non-smoking adults receiving warfarin for at least 6 months. Their demographics, diagnoses, warfarin dosing regimen, concomitant drugs, PT-INR, and bleeding episodes were obtained. CYP2C9 (rs1057910-*3 and rs1799853-*2 alleles), CYP4F2 (rs2108622), and VKORC1 (rs9923231) polymorphisms were assessed using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Three genotype groups (I-III) were defined based on the combined genetic polymorphisms of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 from the FDA's recommendations. Key outcome measures included anticoagulation control, time spent in therapeutic range, stable warfarin dose, WSI, log-INR variability, and Warfarin Composite Measure (WCM).

RESULTS

The study recruited 236 patients; 75 (31.8%) carried a functional CYP2C9 variant allele, and, 143 (60.6%) had at least one T allele in CYP4F2 and 133 (56.4%) had at least one T allele in VKORC1. Groups' II and III CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes were observed with reduced stable warfarin dose, increased WSI, higher log-INR variability, and increased bleeding risk. The presence of *2 or *3 allele in CYP2C9 was observed with reduced stable warfarin doses akin to the presence of T alleles in VKORC1; however, the doses increased with T alleles in CYP4F2.

CONCLUSION

The evaluated genetic polymorphisms significantly influenced all the pharmacodynamic parameters of warfarin. Evaluating CYP2C9, VKORC1, and CYP4F2 genetic polymorphisms prior to warfarin initiation is likely to optimize therapeutic response.

Potential of whole-genome sequencing-based pharmacogenetic profiling

Pharmacogenetics represents a major driver of precision medicine, promising individualized drug selection and dosing. Traditionally, pharmacogenetic profiling has been performed using targeted genotyping that focuses on common/known variants. Recently, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is emerging as a more comprehensive short-read next-generation sequencing approach, enabling both gene diagnostics and pharmacogenetic profiling, including rare/novel variants, in a single assay. Using the example of the pharmacogene CYP2D6, we demonstrate the potential of WGS-based pharmacogenetic profiling as well as emphasize the limitations of short-read next-generation sequencing. In the near future, we envision a shift toward long-read sequencing as the predominant method for gene diagnostics and pharmacogenetic profiling, providing unprecedented data quality and improving patient care.

A network meta-analysis of CYP2C9, CYP2C9 with VKORC1 and CYP2C9 with VKORC1 and CYP4F2 genotype-based warfarin dosing strategies compared to traditional

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES

Variations in genotypes were observed in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that evaluated genotype-based warfarin dosing. We carried out a network meta-analysis to assess whether any clinically significant differences exist between RCTs evaluating CYP2C9 with VKORC1, with CYP2C9 alone and CYP2C9, VKORC1, with CYP4F2 dosing strategies.

METHODS

Electronic records were searched for RCTs comparing genotype-based warfarin with traditional-dosing strategies. Key outcomes included were the time to first therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR); time to stable INR or warfarin dose; percent time in therapeutic range (TTR); and the proportion of patients with supra-therapeutic INR. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were the effect estimates.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Twenty-six studies (7898 patients) were included. CYP2C9-based warfarin dosing was associated with a shorter time to first therapeutic INR (WMD: -2.73, 95% CI: -3.41, -2.05) and stable INR/warfarin dose (WMD: -8.1, 95% CI: -12.54, -3.66). CYP2C9 and VKORC1 were observed with a shorter time to first therapeutic INR (WMD: -1.92, 95% CI: -3.23, -0.61) and stable INR/warfarin dose (WMD: -4.6, 95% CI: -6.87, -2.34) along with a longer TTR (%) (WMD: 3.91, 95% CI: 1.18, 6.63). CYP2C9, VKORC1 and CYP4F2 were observed with a reduced proportion of patients with supra-therapeutic INR (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.93). Trial sequential analysis confirms the superior benefits of CYP2C9 with VKORC1 genotype.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The present evidence is supportive of personalizing warfarin dose based only on CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes compared to traditional strategies. More RCTs are needed to delineate any benefit for adding CYP4F2 to provide sufficient power for pooled analysis. No convincing evidence exists supporting the role of CYP2C9 alone.

Randomized controlled trial of genotype-guided warfarin anticoagulation in Chinese elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Warfarin is an oral anticoagulant which has been widely used to treat and prevent thromboembolic events. Managing warfarin therapy requires careful monitoring and dose titration. This randomized controlled study was designed to assess the effect of genotype-guided warfarin anticoagulation in Chinese elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

507 adults were randomized to receive initial dosing as determined by an algorithm containing genetic (VKORC1 and CYP2C9) plus clinical information or only clinical information. The primary endpoint was the time in therapeutic range (TTR) over 90 days. Secondary end points included haemorrhagic events, thrombotic events and mortality.

RESULTS

The TTR was significantly different between genetic group and control group. The average TTR was (70.80 ± 24.39) % in the genotype-guided group as compared with (53.44 ± 26.73) % in the control group. This represents a difference of 17.36% (95% CI, 11.82 to 22.89, P < .001). The cumulative incidence of total haemorrhagic events, minor haemorrhagic events, gastrointestinal bleeding and intracerebral bleeding events was not significantly different between two groups (P > .05). Follow-up showed that the cumulative incidence of ischaemic stroke events occurred in the genetic group was significantly lower than that in the control group (2.39% vs 6.82%), and the genetic group had a significant lower risk than control group in cumulative incidence of ischaemic stroke events [HR 0.22, (95% CI 0.065 to 0.77), P < .05].

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Genotype-guided dosing could improve the average TTR, and follow-up result showed that genotype-guided therapy resulted in a significantly lower risk of ischaemic stroke events. Further research is required to focus on the clinical benefit of genotype-guided dosing.

Real-time and label-free detection of VKORC1 genes based on a magnetoelastic biosensor for warfarin therapy

Various thrombotic disorders have been treated with the anticoagulant warfarin. However, a small change in warfarin concentration may lead to drug adverse reactions or therapeutic failure due to its narrow therapeutic index. Therefore, the dose of warfarin must be monitored for each patient during therapy in real-time and in a sensitive and stable manner. In this work, we designed a magnetoelastic (ME) biosensor using Metglas alloy 2826 to detect VKORC1 genotypes, which is one of the most important known genetic determinants of warfarin dosing. The sensor enabled both fast responses to DNA binding and wireless transmission of signals. Specifically in the target recognition layer, the sensor introduced an avidin-biotin interaction system for signal amplification by increasing the surface load mass. The resonance frequency shift of the signal was linear to the concentration of the target in the range of 0.1 fM to 10 pM, with a detection limit (LOD) of 0.00389 fM (S/N = 3) and a sensitivity of 45.7 Hz pM^-1. Importantly, this ME-based biosensor was small and portable without the use of any optical labels, which has high potential to be applied in advanced biomedical diagnosis of nucleic acids and proteins.

Genomic research delivering on promises: From rejuvenation to vaccines and pharmacogenetics

What is known and Objective

There has been astounding progress made in the treatment of disease over recent years. This progress is particularly marked in cell therapy and in the personalization of therapy based on genetic insight, an approach known as genomic medicine. Our objective is to comment on the progress made in cell and genomic medicine against an historical backcloth of the search for rejuvenation.

Comment

In 1741, close to seven decades after Antoine van Leeuwenhoek first saw his microscopic animalcules, Abraham Trembley, a tutor in Leiden, reported on an organism that could regenerate itself. The strange organism was thought to hold the secret of life. If it does, we have yet to prise the secret out. However, the ensuing study of cell programming and induced stem cells has shed considerable light on cellular development and provided new insights on the rejuvenative capacity of organisms. Inventive scientists have provided a deeper understanding of cell replication and, from this, developed new medicines for an increasing range of diseases. Targeted therapies, oligonucleotide therapy, therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and pharmacogenetics are all new therapeutic areas originating from the improved insights. More will surely follow.

What is new and conclusion

Immortality is for the gods, but man's search for its elusive secrets, perhaps as old as man himself, will continue. Huge leaps have been made, and effective medicines have been developed from our improved insights into the mechanism of life. However, only the foolish will predict how far this new knowledge will lead us, and more particularly, at what speed new therapies will follow.