Prevalence of diabetes in Japanese patients with cancer

Third Report of the Japan Diabetes Society/Japanese Cancer Association Joint Committee on Diabetes and Cancer: Summary of the results of a questionnaire survey of oncologists and diabetologists-Secondary publication

The Japan Diabetes Society and the Japan Cancer Association launched a joint committee and published their "First Joint Committee Report on Diabetes and Cancer" in 2013, compiling recommendations for physicians and health-care providers as well as for the general population. In 2016, the "Second Joint Committee Report on Diabetes and Cancer" summarized the current evidence on glycemic control and cancer risk in patients with diabetes. The current "Third Joint Committee Report on Diabetes and Cancer", for which the joint committee also enlisted the assistance of the Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, reports on the results from the questionnaire survey, "Diabetes Management in Patients Receiving Cancer Therapy," which targeted oncologists responsible for cancer management and diabetologists in charge of glycemic control in cancer patients. The results of the current survey indicated that there is a general consensus among oncologists and diabetologists with regard to the need for guidelines on glycemic control goals, the relevance of glycemic control, and glycemic control during cancer therapy in cancer patients.

Third Report of the Japan Diabetes Society (JDS)/Japanese Cancer Association (JCA) Joint Committee on diabetes and cancer: summary of the results of a questionnaire survey of oncologists and diabetologists-secondary publication

The Japan Diabetes Society (JDS) and the Japan Cancer Association (JCA) launched a joint committee and published their "First Joint Committee Report on Diabetes and Cancer" in 2013, compiling recommendations for physicians and healthcare providers as well as for the general population. In 2016, the "Second Joint Committee Report on Diabetes and Cancer" summarized the current evidence on glycemic control and cancer risk in patients with diabetes. The current "Third Joint Committee Report on Diabetes and Cancer", for which the joint committee also enlisted the assistance of the Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO) and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO), reports on the results from the questionnaire survey, "Diabetes Management in Patients Receiving Cancer Therapy," which targeted oncologists responsible for cancer management and diabetologists in charge of glycemic control in cancer patients. The results of the current survey demonstrated that there is a general consensus among oncologists and diabetologists with regard to the need for guidelines on glycemic control goals, the relevance of glycemic control, and glycemic control during cancer therapy in cancer patients.

Regional differences in islet amyloid deposition in the residual pancreas with new-onset diabetes secondary to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Islet amyloid deposition and reduced β-cell mass are pathological hallmarks in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects. To date, the pathological features of the islets in diabetes secondary to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have not been specifically addressed.

AIM

To provide further insight into the relationship between islet amyloid deposition of the residual pancreas in PDAC patients and to explore whether regional differences (proximal vs distal residual pancreas) are associated with islet amyloid deposition.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected clinical information and pancreatic tissue removed from tumors of 45 PDAC patients, including 14 patients with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), 16 patients with prediabetes and 15 new-onset diabetes (NOD) patients diagnosed before surgery by an oral glucose tolerance test at West China Hospital from July 2017 to June 2020. Pancreatic volume was calculated by multiplying the estimated area of pancreatic tissue on each image slice by the interval between slices based on abdominal computer tomography scans. Several sections of paraffin-embedded pancreas specimens from both the proximal and/or distal regions remote from the tumor were stained as follows: (1) Hematoxylin and eosin for general histological appearance; (2) hematoxylin and insulin for the determination of fractional β-cell area (immunohistochemistry); and (3) quadruple insulin, glucagon, thioflavin T and DAPI staining for the determination of β-cell area, α-cell area and amyloid deposits.

RESULTS

Screening for pancreatic histologic features revealed that duct obstruction with islet amyloid deposition, fibrosis and marked acinar atrophy were robust in the distal pancreatic regions but much less robust in the proximal regions, especially in the prediabetes and NOD groups. Consistent with this finding, the remnant pancreatic volume was markedly decreased in the NOD group by nearly one-half compared with that in the NGT group (37.35 ± 12.16 cm3 vs 69.79 ± 18.17 cm3, P < 0.001). As expected, islets that stained positive for amyloid (islet amyloid density) were found in the majority of PDAC cases. The proportion of amyloid/islet area (severity of amyloid deposition) was significantly higher in both prediabetes and NOD patients than in NGT patients (P = 0.002; P < 0.0001, respectively). We further examined the regional differences in islet amyloid deposits. Islet amyloid deposit density was robustly increased by approximately 8-fold in the distal regions compared with that in the proximal regions in the prediabetes and NOD groups (3.98% ± 3.39% vs 0.50% ± 0.72%, P = 0.01; 12.03% vs 1.51%, P = 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, these findings suggest that robust alterations of the distal pancreas due to tumors can disturb islet function and structure with islet amyloid formation, which may be associated with the pathogenesis of NOD secondary to PDAC.