Synergy between the pay-for-performance scheme and better physician-patient relationship might reduce the risk of retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes

Pay-for-performance in Taiwan: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical literature

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the impact of pay-for-performance (P4P) programmes on healthcare in Taiwan.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane review, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO databases up to July 2023. Meta-analysis of the available outcomes was conducted using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The search yielded 85 studies, of which 58 investigated the programme for diabetes mellitus (DM), eight looked at the programme for chronic kidney disease (CKD), and the remaining studies examined programmes for breast cancer, tuberculosis, schizophrenia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The DM P4P programme was a cost-effective strategy associated with reduced hospitalisation and subsequent complications. The CKD P4P was associated with a lower risk of dialysis initiation. The P4P programme also improved outcomes in breast cancer, cure rates in tuberculosis, reduced admissions for schizophrenia and reduced acute exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The meta-analysis revealed that the P4P programme for DM (odds ratio [OR] = 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.48-0.73) and CKD (OR = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.67-0.81) significantly reduced mortality risk. However, participation rate in the DM P4P programme was only 19% in 2014.

CONCLUSIONS

P4P programmes in Taiwan improve quality of care. However, participation was voluntary and the participation rate was very low, raising the concern of selective enrolment of participants (i.e. 'cherry-picking' behaviour) by physicians. Future programme reforms should focus on well-designed features with the aim of reducing healthcare disparities.

Development of diabetes complications within coordinated and structured primary health care: a 10-year retrospective cohort study in Germany

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus is a growing, costly, and potentially preventable public health issue. In 2004, Germany introduced the GP-centred healthcare programme to strengthen primary care.

AIM

To assess the hazards of the most common diabetes-related complications in patients enrolled in GP-centred health care in comparison with usual primary care.

DESIGN & SETTING

A retrospective cohort study based on German claims data (4 million members) from 2011-2020.

METHOD

In total, 217 964 patients with diabetes were monitored from 2011-2020. Endpoints were blindness, amputation, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary heart disease, dialysis, hypoglycaemia, and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used for multivariable analysis and adjusted for sociodemographic, practice, and disease-specific characteristics.

RESULTS

Compared with usual care (n = 98 609 patients), GP-centred health care (n = 119 355 patients) showed a relative risk reduction of blindness of 12%, and amputation of 20% over 10 years. The estimated impact of GP-centred health care on myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary artery disease, dialysis, and all-cause mortality is significantly favourable in comparison with usual care. However, the proportional risk of hypoglycaemia (+1.2%) in the interventional group is higher than in usual care.

CONCLUSION

Enrolment in GP-centred health care appears to result in a consistent reduction of the relative risk of diabetes-related complications over 10 years. The significant difference in contrast to usual care may be explained by robust, structured primary care provision, including the diabetes disease management programme, and improved coordination and networking of care within primary and secondary care.

Adaptation of risk prediction equations for cardiovascular outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes in real-world settings: a cross-institutional study using common data model approach

OBJECTIVE

To adapt risk prediction equations for myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and heart failure (HF) among patients with type 2 diabetes in real-world settings using cross-institutional electronic health records (EHRs) in Taiwan.

METHODS

The EHRs from two medical centers, National Cheng Kung University Hospital (NCKUH; 11,740 patients) and National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH; 20,313 patients), were analyzed using the common data model approach. Risk equations for MI, stroke, and HF from UKPDS-OM2, RECODe, and CHIME models were adapted for external validation and recalibration. External validation was assessed by (1) discrimination, evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and (2) calibration, evaluated by calibration slopes and intercepts and the Greenwood-Nam-D'Agostino (GND) test. Recalibration was conducted for unsatisfactory calibration (p-value of GND test < 0.05) by adjusting the baseline hazards of original equations to address variations in patients' cardiovascular risks across institutions.

RESULTS

The CHIME risk equations had acceptable discrimination (AUROC: 0.71-0.79) and better calibration than that for UKPDS-OM2 and RECODe, although the calibration remained unsatisfactory. After recalibration, the calibration slopes/intercepts of the CHIME-MI, CHIME-stroke, and CHIME-HF risk equations were 0.9848/- 0.0008, 1.1003/- 0.0046, and 0.9436/0.0063 in the NCKUH population and 1.1060/- 0.0011, 0.8714/0.0030, and 1.0476/- 0.0016 in the NTUH population, respectively. All the recalibrated risk equations showed satisfactory calibration (p-values of GND tests ≥ 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We provide valid risk prediction equations for MI, stroke, and HF outcomes in Taiwanese type 2 diabetes populations. A framework for adapting risk equations across institutions is also proposed.

Long-term outcomes of the pay-for-performance program for patients with young-onset (20-40 years of age) type 2 diabetes

AIMS

To investigate the long-term outcomes of Pay-for-Performance (P4P) care in patients with young-onset (20-40 years of age) diabetes (YOD).

METHODS

We recruited 3088 pairs of propensity-score matched patients with and without P4P care from the National Health Insurance Research Database between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2017. The study used a multivariable Cox regression model to compare the risks of mortality, hospitalization for cardiovascular events, and major microvascular outcomes in YOD patients with and without P4P care.

RESULTS

The multivariable-adjusted model showed that patients with P4P care had significantly lower risks of mortality (aHR 0.31, 95% CI 0.25-0.38) and hospitalization for cardiovascular events (aHR 0.63, 95% CI 0.5-0.79) but a significantly higher risk of major microvascular outcomes (aHR 1.31, 95% CI 1.07-1.6). Patients with a longer cumulative duration of P4P and complete P4P care showed further lower risks of mortality, hospitalization for cardiovascular events, and major microvascular outcomes than those without P4P care.

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide cohort study showed that young-onset diabetes patients with P4P care had lower risks of death and cardiovascular events but a higher risk of major microvascular outcomes. However, patients with a longer duration of P4P care showed lower risks of these outcomes.

Self-efficacy remains a vital factor in reducing the risk of dialysis in type 2 diabetes care

Studies have provided promising outcomes of the pay-for-performance (P4P) program or with good continuity of care levels in diabetes control.We investigate the different exposures in continuity of care (COC) with their providers and those who participate in the P4P program and its effects on the risk of diabetes diabetic nephropathy in the future.We obtained COC and P4P information from the annual database, to which we applied a hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) in 3 levels adjusted to account for other covariates as well as the effects of hospital clustering and accumulating time.Newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes in 2003At the individual level, those with a higher Diabetes Complications Severity Index (DCSI) score have a higher likelihood of diabetic nephropathy than those with a lower DCSI (OR, 1.46), whereas contrasting results were obtained for the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (odds ratio[OR], 0.88). Patients who visited family physicians, endocrinologists, and gastroenterologists showed a lower likelihood of diabetic nephropathy (OR, 0.664, 0.683, and 0.641, respectively), whereas those who continued to visit neurologists showed an increased risk of diabetic nephropathy by 4 folds. At the hospital level, patients with diabetes visiting primary care clinics had a lower risk of diabetic nephropathy with an OR of 0.584 than those visiting hospitals of other higher levels. Regarding the repeat time level, the patients who had a higher COC score and participated in the P4P program had a reduced diabetic nephropathy risk with an OR of 0.339 and 0.775, respectively.Diabetes control necessitates long-term care involving the patients' healthcare providers for the management of their conditions to reduce the risk of diabetic nephropathy. Indeed, most contributing factors are related to patients, but we cannot eliminate the optimal outcomes related to good relationships with healthcare providers and participation in the P4P program.

Experience of Patients with Diabetes and Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Health Professionals and Healthcare in Spain

We aimed to evaluate the experience of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) with healthcare received in Spain. This was a retrospective, observational study in patients with T2DM cared for in primary healthcare (PHC) centers. A cross-sectional analysis of the patients' experience data was performed using the Instrument for the Evaluation of the Experience of Chronic Patients (IEXPAC). A total of 475 patients with T2DM were recruited from 36 PHC centers, of which 248 (52.2%) completed the IEXPAC questionnaire. The IEXPAC total mean score (range 0-10) was 7 points, with an average "new relational model" score of 2.5 points. The mean continuity of care score after hospital discharge was 6.2 points. The results showed that 8% of the patients always or almost always used the internet to check their medical history, appointments or other data from their healthcare service, and 15% responded that healthcare professionals always or almost always informed them of forums or other reliable internet sites to obtain information about their illness. The study results show that there is a wide margin for improvement in the experience of patients with T2DM with healthcare in Spain, especially regarding the information patients receive or can obtain.