Comparison of glucose time in range and area under curve in range in relation to risk of diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes patients

Current landscape and comprehensive management of glycemic variability in diabetic retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy (DR), a well-known microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus, remains the main cause of vision loss in working-age adults worldwide. Up to now, there is a shortage of information in the study regarding the contributing factors of DR in diabetes. Accumulating evidence has identified glycemic variability (GV), referred to fluctuations of blood glucose levels, as a risk factor for diabetes-related complications. Recent reports demonstrate that GV plays an important role in accounting for the susceptibility to DR development. However, its exact role in the pathogenesis of DR is still not fully understood. In this review, we highlight the current landscape and relevant mechanisms of GV in DR, as well as address the mechanism-based therapeutic strategies, aiming at better improving the quality of DR management in clinical practice.

Glycaemia risk index uncovers distinct glycaemic variability patterns associated with remission status in type 1 diabetes

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this work was to define a unique remission status using glycaemia risk index (GRI) and other continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics in individuals with type 1 diabetes for improved phenotyping.

METHODS

A group of 140 individuals with type 1 diabetes were recruited for a cross-sectional study. The participants were categorised into four groups based on their remission status, which was defined as insulin-dose-adjusted A1c (IDAA1c) <9 or C-peptide ≥300 pmol/l: new-onset (n=24); mid-remission (n=44); post-remission (n=44); and non-remission (individuals who did not experience remission, n=28). Participants in the remission phase were referred to as 'remitters', while those who were not in the remission phase were referred to as 'non-remitters', the latter group including new-onset, post-remission and non-remission participants. Clinical variables such as HbA1c, C-peptide and insulin daily dose, as well as IDAA1C and CGM data, were collected. The patterns of CGM metrics were analysed for each group using generalised estimating equations to investigate the glycaemic variability patterns associated with remission status. Then, unsupervised hierarchical clustering was used to place the participants into subgroups based on GRI and other CGM core metrics.

RESULTS

The glycaemic variability patterns associated with remission status were found to be distinct based on the circadian CGM metrics. Remitters showed improved control of blood glucose levels over 14 days within the range of 3.9-10 mmol/l, and lower GRI compared with non-remitters (p<0.001). Moreover, GRI strongly correlated with IDAA1C (r=0.62; p<0.001) and was sufficient to distinguish remitters from non-remitters. Further, four subgroups demonstrating distinct patterns of glycaemic variability associated with different remission status were identified by clustering on CGM metrics: remitters with low risk of dysglycaemia; non-remitters with high risk of hypoglycaemia; non-remitters with high risk of hyperglycaemia; and non-remitters with moderate risk of dysglycaemia.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

GRI, an integrative index, together with other traditional CGM metrics, helps to identify different glycaemic variability patterns; this might provide specifically tailored monitoring and management strategies for individuals in the various subclusters.

Research progress in the application of time in range: more than a percentage

ABSTRACT

Glucose monitoring is an important part of medical care in diabetes mellitus, which not only helps assess glycemic control and treatment safety, but also assists with treatment adjustment. With the development of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), the use of CGM has increased rapidly. With the wealth of glucose data produced by CGM, new metrics are greatly needed to optimally evaluate glucose status and guide the treatment. One of the parameters that CGM provides, time in range (TIR), has been recognized as a key metric by the international consensus. Before the adoption of TIR in clinical practice, several issues including the minimum length of CGM use, the setting of the target range, and individualized TIR goals are summarized. Additionally, we discussed the mounting evidence supporting the association between TIR and diabetes-related outcomes. As a novel glucose metric, it is of interest to compare TIR with other conventional glucose markers such as glycated hemoglobin A1c. It is anticipated that the use of TIR may provide further information on the quality of glucose control and lead to improved diabetes management.