French updated recommendations in Stage I to III melanoma treatment and management

Exploring Patients' Perceptions of One-step Surgery for Primary Cutaneous Melanoma: A Qualitative Study

High-frequency ultrasonography (> 20 MHz) has allowed for preoperative measurement of melanoma thickness and thus a one-step surgery strategy. The potential benefits of one-step surgery to patients remain unexplored. From June 2022 to August 2023, 2 dermatologists conducted semi-structured individual interviews with patients who had undergone HFUS examination allowing the choice for one-step surgery (group A) and with patients who had had standard two-step surgery (group B). Analysis of interviews with 21 patients (age range 31-81 years) revealed 5 main themes: (a) understanding the diagnosis, highlighting the significance of clear and comprehensive medical explanations; (b) personal factors considered in treatment decisions, including preferences for minimizing surgical procedures; (c) making choices, bearing responsibility, thus showcasing different levels of patient involvement in decision-making; (d) high- frequency ultrasonography reassurance emphasizing the role of medical reassurance, and (e) patient satisfaction, discussing surgical outcomes and the decision-making process. The majority of participants expressed a clear preference for one-step surgery, perceived as a pragmatic and fast surgical strategy while minimizing interventions. In conclusion, the results emphasize the importance of patient-centred care. These insights can guide improved preoperative consultations and enhance shared decision-making between healthcare professionals and patients regarding melanoma treatment strategies.

Cost-of-Illness of Skin Cancer: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Skin cancer's rising incidence demands understanding of its economic impact. The current understanding is fragmented because of the various methodological approaches applied in skin cancer cost-of-illness studies.

OBJECTIVE

This study systematically reviews melanoma and keratinocyte carcinoma cost-of-illness studies to provide an overview of the applied methodological approaches and to identify the main cost drivers.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted adhering to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from December 2022 until December 2023 using a search strategy with entry terms related to the concepts of skin cancer and cost of illness. The records were screened on the basis of the title and abstract and subsequently on full text against predetermined eligibility criteria. Articles published before 2012 were excluded. A nine-item checklist adapted for cost-of-illness studies was used to assess the methodological quality of the articles.

RESULTS

This review included a total of 45 studies, together evaluating more than half a million patients. The majority of the studies (n = 36) focused on melanoma skin cancer, a few (n = 3) focused on keratinocyte carcinomas, and 6 studies examined both. Direct costs were estimated in all studies, while indirect costs were only estimated in nine studies. Considerable heterogeneity was observed across studies, mainly owing to disparities in study population, methodological approaches, included cost categories, and differences in healthcare systems. In melanoma skin cancer, both direct and indirect costs increased with progressing tumor stage. In advanced stage melanoma, systemic therapy emerged as the main cost driver. In contrast, for keratinocyte carcinoma no obvious cost drivers were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

A homogeneous skin cancer cost-of-illness study design would be beneficial to enhance between-studies comparability, identification of cost drivers, and support evidence-based decision-making for skin cancer.

Surveillance After a Previous Cutaneous Melanoma Diagnosis: A Scoping Review of Melanoma Follow-Up Guidelines

INTRODUCTION

Cutaneous melanoma accounts for more than 70% of all skin cancer deaths. Follow-up surveillance is an integral part of melanoma patient care, to facilitate early detection of recurrences and subsequent primary melanomas. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an overview of recently published melanoma surveillance guidelines from regional and national melanoma working groups.

METHODS

A systematic search for relevant studies in MEDLINE and Embase was conducted in September 2022 and was limited to publications from 2010 or later.

RESULTS

A total of 1047 articles were retrieved, and after abstract and full text review, 26 articles from 19 different organizations met inclusion criteria. Life-long annual skin surveillance with a physician was recommended by 53% (9/17) of guidelines. Routine laboratory investigations were recommended by 7/19 guidelines. Regional lymph node ultrasound was recommended by 9/16 guidelines, most often in stage IB or higher, and was optional in 7/16 for patients who met specific criteria. Surveillance with PET-CT or CT and MRI was recommended by 15 and 11 guidelines, respectively, most commonly in stage IIC or higher, with a variable frequency and total duration. Five out of 9 guidelines indicated a preference for skin surveillance to be completed with a dermatologist.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines were highly variable for many aspects of melanoma surveillance, which may be partly attributed to regional differences in healthcare workforce distribution and availability of imaging technologies. Further high-level studies are recommended to provide more evidence on the most effective clinical and imaging follow-up surveillance protocols.

Effectiveness of clinical and instrumental follow-up for cutaneous melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Follow-up guidelines for melanoma greatly differ in the methods of screening for recurrence, and timing and duration of the follow up, with many areas of controversy and a lack of general consensus. The aims of this study are to present our protocol and case series for follow up and to summarize and discuss current literature on melanoma follow-up guidelines/recommendations in different countries.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 539 patients operated for melanoma between 2004 and 2013 at the same Institution. Data on the diagnostic role of the different clinical and instrumental detection methods were adjusted for sex, age at diagnosis, staging and evaluated by Fisher's exact test and multivariate analysis. Recommendations from the literature were summarized and discussed.

RESULTS

Local recurrences and second melanoma were always identified through physical examination, irrespectively of melanoma staging. Regional metastases were most often identified through physical examination and ultrasound, being more frequent in stage II and III, while distant metastases were most often identified through CT scans. Surveillance follow-up schedules vary significantly depending on country, physician specialty, and stage of disease, with a lack of evidence on the efficacy of the different schemes. Similarities and controversies in the different follow-up protocols are presented and discussed.

CONCLUSION

Our clinical series showed that physical examination is very powerful in identifying local recurrences and second melanomas. Physical examination and ultrasound are equally powerful in identifying regional metastases, and alternating them over time could allow to reduce the number of follow-up visits. CT scans, differently from chest x-ray, showed a high power in identifying distant metastases. Surveillance follow-up schedules in the literature vary significantly depending on country, physician specialty, and stage of disease, with a lack of evidence on the efficacy of the different schemes. Standard protocols are desirable for a better evaluation of results.

Melanoma and intellectual disability: do prognostic factors at diagnosis differ from general population?

BACKGROUND

Few melanoma cases are reported in individuals with intellectual disability (ID), and prognostic factors at diagnosis are unknown in this population. This work was designed to investigate whether prognostic factors at diagnostic are different in patients with ID compared with a general population.

METHODS

Melanoma cases retrieved from Hérault's Tumour Registry (HTR) from 1995 to 2015 were cross-referenced against a list of adult patients with ID, living in Hérault. Major prognostic factors were compared with those in non-ID melanoma patients included in HTR and in patients followed by Montpellier University Hospital and included in the Réseau pour la Recherche et l'Investigation Clinique sur le Mélanome (RIC-Mel) database.

RESULTS

Ten melanoma cases in individuals with ID were identified and compared with 3804 non-ID melanoma cases in HTR and 1024 non-ID melanoma cases included in RIC-Mel. Mean Breslow thickness at diagnosis was 4.6 mm in melanoma cases among those with ID versus 1.89 mm in HTR (P = 0.109) and 2.36 mm in RIC-Mel (P = 0.156). Stage at diagnosis was superior to stage IIB in 42.9% of ID cases versus 11.4% of non-ID cases in HTR (P < 0.05) and 8.5% in RIC-Mel (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Melanomas in patients with ID had less favourable prognostic factors at diagnosis, including higher Breslow thickness and more advanced stage, than melanomas in non-ID patients. These adverse prognostic factors indicate a later diagnosis in this population, leading to a poorer prognosis. This work underlines the need to improve melanoma screening among individuals with ID.

Appraisal of International Guidelines for Cutaneous Melanoma Management using the AGREE II assessment tool

BACKGROUND

The evidence base behind new melanoma treatments is rapidly accumulating. This is not necessarily reflected in current guidance. A recent UK-based expert consensus statement, published in JPRAS, has called for updates to the widely accepted 2015 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline for melanoma (NG14). We aimed to compare the quality of NG14 to all other melanoma guidelines published since.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Medline, and online clinical practice guideline databases to identify melanoma guidelines published between 29th July 2015 and 23rd August 2021 providing recommendations for adjuvant treatment, radiotherapy, surgical management, or follow-up care. Three authors independently assessed the quality of identified guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Instrument II (AGREE II) assessment tool, which measures six domains of guideline development. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine guidelines were included and appraised with excellent concordance (Kendall's W for overall guideline score 0.88, p<0.001). Overall, melanoma guidelines scored highly in the domains of 'Scope and purpose' and 'Clarity of presentation', but poorly in the 'Applicability' domain. The NICE guideline on melanoma (NG14) achieved the best overall scores.

CONCLUSION

Melanoma treatment has advanced since NG14 was published, however, the NICE melanoma guideline is of higher quality than more recent alternatives. The planned update of NG14 in 2022 is in demand.

No Recurrence in Primary Invasive Stage 1a and 1b Melanoma and Melanoma in Situ Treated With Serial Disk Staged Excision

BACKGROUND

Optimal surgical treatment modality for invasive melanoma (IM) and melanoma in situ (MIS) has been debated with proponents for standard wide local excision (WLE), serial disk staged excision, and Mohs micrographic surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to identify the recurrence rates and surgical margins of invasive stage 1 melanoma and MIS lesions using serial disk staged excision technique with rush permanent processing and "bread loafing" microscopic analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Recurrence rates and surgical margins of 63 IM and 207 MIS at the University of California Dermatology Surgery Unit were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

No recurrences were observed with average follow-up of 34 and 36 months for IM and MIS, respectively (range, 10-92 months). Average surgical margins were 19.8 mm (SD 9.7) for IM and 12.1 mm (SD 12.2) for MIS.

CONCLUSION

This SSE technique for the treatment of IM and MIS is comparable in efficacy to other SSE techniques, and it offers physicians a simple and accessible alternative to WLE and MMS.

Melanoma In Situ: A Critical Review and Re-Evaluation of Current Excision Margin Recommendations

Most international clinical guidelines recommend 5-10 mm clinical margins for excision of melanoma in situ (MIS). While the evidence supporting this is weak, these guidelines are generally consistent. However, as a result of the high incidence of subclinical extension of MIS, especially of the lentigo maligna (LM) subtype, wider margins will often be needed to achieve complete histologic clearance. In this review, we assessed all available contemporary evidence on clearance margins for MIS. No randomized trials were identified and the 31 non-randomized studies were largely retrospective reviews of single-surgeon or single-institution experiences using Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for LM or staged excision (SE) for treatment of MIS on the head/neck and/or LM specifically. The available data challenge the adequacy of current international guidelines as they consistently demonstrate the need for clinical margins > 5 mm and often > 10 mm. For LM, any MIS on the head/neck, and/or ≥ 3 cm in diameter, all may require wider clinical margins because of the higher likelihood of subclinical spread. Histologic clearance should be confirmed prior to undertaking complex reconstruction. However, it is not clear whether wider margins are necessary for all MIS subtypes. Indeed, it seems that this is unlikely to be the case. Until optimal surgical margins can be better defined in a randomized trial setting, ideally controlling for MIS subtype and including correlation with histologic excision margins, techniques such as preliminary border mapping of large, ill-defined lesions and, most importantly, sound clinical judgement will be needed when planning surgical clearance margins for the treatment of MIS.

Desmoplastic melanoma: a review of its pathology and clinical behaviour, and of management recommendations in published guidelines

Desmoplastic melanomas are uncommon. Their behaviour differs from that of other melanoma subtypes; therefore, management guidelines for non-desmoplastic melanomas may not be applicable. This review sought to examine all available evidence relating to the behaviour and management of desmoplastic melanomas, based on review of all relevant English-language publications, and to critically assess the recommendations for their management in current published melanoma management guidelines. Compared with other melanoma subtypes, patients with 'pure' desmoplastic melanomas (where ≥90% of the invasive melanoma is of desmoplastic melanoma subtype) have much lower rates of sentinel node positivity and distant metastasis. Local recurrence rates are higher for desmoplastic melanomas, but resection margins wider than those recommended for non-desmoplastic melanomas have not been shown to be of benefit. Adjuvant radiotherapy reduces the risk of local recurrence when a satisfactory histological clearance (≥8 mm) cannot be achieved. Of 29 published melanoma management guidelines identified, only 11 specified management for desmoplastic melanomas, while seven simply stated that the feature should be reported. Desmoplastic melanoma is a unique melanoma subtype with biology that differs from that of other melanoma subtypes. It requires specific management strategies but few current guidelines address these.

ESP, EORTC, and EURACAN Expert Opinion: practical recommendations for the pathological diagnosis and clinical management of intermediate melanocytic tumors and rare related melanoma variants

The recent WHO classification of skin tumors has underscored the importance of acknowledging intermediate grade melanocytic proliferations. A multistep acquisition of oncogenic events drives the progressive transformation of nevi into melanomas. The various pathways described are modulated by the initial oncogenic drivers that define the common, blue, and Spitz nevi groups. Intermediate lesions are most often the result of a clonal evolution within such nevi. Based on this established classification, we have suggested for each pathway a practical diagnostic approach, benefiting from the recently developed molecular tools, both in the setting of general pathology labs and expert centers. Moreover, recommendations regarding the re-excision and clinical follow-up are given to support decision-making in multidisciplinary tumor boards.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Nivolumab in Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma in France

Introduction

The aim of the current study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant treatment with nivolumab relative to clinically relevant comparators in adult patients with melanoma with lymph node involvement or metastatic disease who have undergone complete resection from a French societal perspective.

Methods

The comparators were observation, low-dose interferon and pembrolizumab. A subgroup analysis was carried out in patients with BRAF mutation, adding dabrafenib plus trametinib. A three-state partitioned survival model was developed to project costs and health benefits over a 20-year time horizon. Extrapolation for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was carried out using spline-based models. Because of the immaturity of OS data in pivotal trials for nivolumab and pembrolizumab, a predictive model of OS treatment effect based on RFS effect was developed using a correlation equation. Health state utilities and adverse events disutilities were derived from the CheckMate 238 trial and literature. Costs were estimated in 2019 euros. The model’s primary outcome was efficiency frontier. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of results.

Results

Observation, low-dose interferon and nivolumab were on the efficiency frontier. The incremental cost–utility ratio of nivolumab versus low-dose interferon (closest therapy on the efficiency frontier) was €37,886/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis reported an 80% probability of nivolumab being a cost-effective strategy for a willingness-to-pay threshold of €52,000/QALY. In the subgroup with BRAF mutation, the efficiency frontier was not changed by the addition of dabrafenib plus trametinib.

Conclusions

Nivolumab is a cost-effective strategy as adjuvant treatment in adult patients with surgically resected melanoma in France.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s13555-020-00446-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Quality of Practice Guidelines for Melanoma: A Methodologic Appraisal with the AGREE II and AGREE-REX Instruments

Multiple guidelines on cutaneous melanoma (CM) are available from several consortia and countries. To provide up-to-date guidance in the rapidly changing field of melanoma treatment, guideline developers have to provide regular updates without compromises of quality. We performed a systematic search in guideline databases, Medline and Embase to identify guidelines on CM. The methodological quality of the identified guidelines was independently assessed by five reviewers using the instruments “Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation” (AGREE II) and “Recommendation EXcellence” (AGREE-REX). We performed descriptive analysis, explored subgroup differences using the Kruskal–Wallis (H) test and examined the relationship between distinct domains and items of the instruments with Spearman’s correlation. Six guidelines by consortia from Australia, France, Germany, Scotland, Spain and the United States of America were included. The German guideline fulfilled 71%–98% of criteria in AGREE II and 78%–96% for AGREE-REX, obtaining the highest scores. Deficiencies in the domains of “applicability” and “values and preferences” were observed in all guidelines. The German and Spanish guidelines significantly differed from each other in most of the domains. The domains “applicability” and “values and preferences” were identified as methodological weaknesses requiring careful revision and improvement in the future.

Systemic adjuvant therapy for adult patients at high risk for recurrent cutaneous or mucosal melanoma: an Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) clinical practice guideline

Background

Previous versions of the guideline from the Program in Evidence-Based Care (pebc) at Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) recommended that the use of high-dose interferon alfa 2b therapy be discussed and offered to patients with resected cutaneous melanoma with a high risk of recurrence. Subsequently, several clinical trials in patients with resected or metastatic melanoma found that immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies have a benefit greater than that with interferon. It was therefore considered timely for an update to the guideline about adjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma.

Methods

The present guideline was developed by the pebc and the Melanoma Disease Site Group (dsg). Based on a systematic review from a literature search conducted using medline, embase, and the Evidence Based Medicine Reviews databases for the period 1996 to 28 May 2019, the Working Group drafted recommendations. The systematic review and recommendations were then circulated to the Melanoma dsg and the pebc Report Approval Panel for internal review; the revised document underwent external review.

Recommendations

For patients with completely resected cutaneous or mucosal melanoma with a high risk of recurrence, the recommended adjuvant therapies are nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or dabrafenib-trametinib for patients with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations; nivolumab or pembrolizumab are recommend for patients with BRAF wild-type disease. Use of ipilimumab is not recommended. Molecular testing should be conducted to help guide treatment decisions. Interferon alfa, chemotherapy regimens, vaccines, levamisole, bevacizumab, bacillus Calmette-Guérin, and isolated limb perfusion are not recommended for adjuvant treatment of cutaneous melanoma except as part of a clinical trial.

[Stage III melanoma: Sentinel node biopsy, completion lymph node dissection and prospects of adjuvant therapy. A French national survey on current and envisaged practices]

BACKGROUND

The recent publication of randomized trials investigating the efficacy of adjuvant therapy and completion lymph node dissection at microscopic stage III melanoma calls for a reappraisal of melanoma management from different angles: indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy, indications for completion lymph node dissection in microscopic-stage disease, and adjuvant therapies. Our objective was to evaluate current practices and to question French onco-dermatologists about any changes they envisaged in their practices in the light of recent publications.

METHODS

We conducted a national survey among members of the Cutaneous Oncology Group of the French Society of Dermatology in October 2017.

RESULTS

Forty French health centers were included, and 53 individual responses were collected. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma was performed at 75 % of the centers. Before the summer of 2017 and the publication of MSLT-II (proving the absence of any therapeutic benefits for complete lymph node dissection in microscopic stage III melanoma), when a positive sentinel lymph node was diagnosed, immediate completion lymph node dissection was performed at 90 % of the centers. After the publication of MSLT-II, 45 % of the respondents considered stopping this practice. The risk-benefit ratio prompted prescription of nivolumab and of combined dabrafenib+trametinib as adjuvant therapy by respectively 96 % and 79 % of respondents, while the corresponding rates for interferon and ipilimumab were only 21 % and 15 %.

CONCLUSION

Early melanoma management stands on the verge of major changes thanks to the arrival of efficient adjuvant therapies and a decrease in immediate completion lymph node dissections for patients with microscopic stage III is also anticipated.

[Melanoma update]

Incidence of malignant melanoma has been increasing since the 1980s. For loco-regional stages, surgery is still the best treatment. Melanoma has a high distant metastatic potential and prognosis of advanced stages was until recently very poor. Since 2011 however, a real revolution has taken place in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. This is based upon considerably improved knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of melanoma and cancer immunology. Thus, two new classes of systemic therapeutic agents are now available: immunotherapies (immunological checkpoint inhibitors), which increase the antitumor immune response, and targeted therapies (BRAF and MEK inhibitors) for patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma. Overall survival is now 2 years or above, with hope for a cure in some cases. Unfortunately, the efficacy of these treatments is incomplete and many studies are underway to try to identify predictive biomarkers, and multiple combinations are being evaluated to increase response rates. The efficacy of these treatments has also been shown in the adjuvant setting in high-risk melanoma, they should be available shortly.

Safety assessment of anticancer drugs in association with radiotherapy in metastatic malignant melanoma: a real-life report : Radiation/systemic drug combo in metastatic melanoma

PURPOSE

To assess the safety of the association of radiotherapy (RT) and systemic treatments for patients with metastatic malignant melanoma (mMM).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis included consecutive patients treated with palliative RT, and at least one line of systemic therapy for mMM between 2001 and 2016. Treatments were defined as sequential or concomitant when RT and the systemic drug were administered, respectively, at more or less than five half-lives from each other.

RESULTS

92 patients were included. They had 110 palliative RT treatments. RT was delivered with a "conventional" chemotherapy (mainly fotemustine and/or dacarbazine) and a "modern" systemic therapy (BRAF inhibitors, association of BRAF and MEK inhibitors, immunotherapy), respectively, in 88 (80%) and 22 (20%) cases. Systemic treatments and RT were mainly concurrently performed (n = 61, 55.5%). Regarding acute grade ≥ 3 toxicity, no difference was reported between sequential and concomitant groups either in the whole cohort (p = 1) or in the subgroup of patients receiving "modern" systemic therapies (p = 1). Acute and late grade ≥ 3 toxicities only occurred with vemurafenib. BRAF inhibitors and RT produced more severe infield adverse events than other associations (p = 0.001) with two deaths.

CONCLUSION

In our series, compared to sequential administration, concomitant association of systemic anticancer drugs and palliative RT did not increase toxicity in mMM patients. BRAF inhibitors and RT produced severe infield toxicities. Prospective studies are needed to better characterize the toxicity of each association.