European S3-Guideline on the systemic treatment of psoriasis vulgaris - Update Apremilast and Secukinumab - EDF in cooperation with EADV and IPC

Is Telemedicine Suitable for Patients with Chronic Inflammatory Skin Conditions? A Systematic Review

Telemedicine, the provision of remote healthcare, has gained prominence, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. It has the potential to replace routine in-person follow-up visits for patients with chronic inflammatory skin conditions. However, it remains unclear whether telemedicine can effectively substitute in-person consultations for this patient group. This systematic review assessed the effectiveness and safety of telemedicine compared with traditional in-person care for chronic inflammatory skin diseases. A comprehensive search in various databases identified 11 articles, including 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 clinical controlled trial (CCT). These studies evaluated telemedicine's impact on patients with psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, with varying methods like video consultations and digital platforms. The findings tentatively suggest that telemedicine does not seem to be inferior compared with in-person care, particularly in terms of condition severity and quality of life for patients with chronic inflammatory skin diseases. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the inherent uncertainties in the evidence. There are indications that telemedicine can offer benefits such as cost-effectiveness, time savings, and reduced travel distances, but it is important to recognize these findings as preliminary, necessitating further validation through more extensive research.

Infections in the era of immunobiologicals

Immunobiologicals represent an innovative therapeutic option in dermatology. They are indicated in severe and refractory cases of different diseases when there is contraindication, intolerance, or failure of conventional systemic therapy and in cases with significant impairment of patient quality of life. The main immunobiologicals used in dermatology basically include inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF), inhibitors of interleukin-12 and -23 (anti-IL12/23), inhibitors of interleukin-17 and its receptor (anti-IL17), inhibitors of interleukin-23 (anti-IL23), rituximab (anti-CD20 antibody), dupilumab (anti-IL4/IL13) and intravenous immunoglobulin. Their immunomodulatory action may be associated with an increase in the risk of infections in the short and long term, and each case must be assessed individually, according to the risk inherent to the drug, the patient general condition, and the need for precautions. This article will discuss the main risks of infection associated with the use of immunobiologicals, addressing the risk in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients, vaccination, fungal infections, tuberculosis, leprosy, and viral hepatitis, and how to manage the patient in the most diverse scenarios.

The Saudi consensus recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis (2023)

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a complex inflammatory disease characterized by musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal manifestations. It is a distinct disease entity at the interface between rheumatology and dermatology, making it challenging to manage. The diverse clinical presentation and severity of PsA require a multidisciplinary approach for optimal care. Early diagnosis and management are necessary to improving quality of life for patients. In Saudi Arabia, there is currently no unified national consensus on the best practices for managing PsA. This lack of consensus leads to debate and uncertainty in the treatment of the disease, resulting in over or under prescribing of biological agents. To address this issue, a multidisciplinary work group was formed by the Saudi Ministry of Health. This group, consisting of dermatologists, rheumatologists, and pharmacists, aimed to develop evidence-based consensus recommendations for he use and monitoring of biological therapy in PsA management. The work group conducted five consensus workshops between December 2021 to March 2022. Using the nominal group technique, they discussed various aspects of PsA management, including eligibility criteria for biological treatment, monitoring of disease activity, treatment goals, screening, precautions, and management of PsA with biologic therapies. The group also considered special considerations for patients with comorbidities, pregnant and lactating women, as well as pediatric and adolescent populations. The resulting consensus document provides recommendations that are applicable to the Saudi setting, taking into account international guidelines and the specific needs of PsA patients in the country. The consensus document will be regularly updated to incorporate new data and therapeutic agents as they become available. Key Points • In Saudi Arabia, there is a lack of unified national consensus on the optimal management of PsA, therefore, this article aims to provide up-to-date evidence-based consensus recommendations for the optimal use and monitoring of biologic therapy in the management of PsA in Saudi Arabia. • The consensus development process was undertaken by a multidisciplinary work group of 13 experts, including two dermatologists, six rheumatologists, and five pharmacists. • There is more than one disease activity tool used in PsA disease, depending on the disease domain - peripheral arthritis Disease Activity Index in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) or Minimal Disease Activity (MDA), axial PsA Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), and dactylitis and enthesitis MDA. • The main goal of therapy in all patients with PsA is to achieve the target of remission, or alternatively, low disease activity in all disease domains and improve quality of life (QoL).

Selection of Quality Indicators for the Certification of Psoriasis Units: The CUDERMA Project Delphi Consensus Study

Defining quality indicators is a key strategy for ensuring the quality and standardization of health care. The CUDERMA project, an initiative of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venerology (AEDV), was undertaken to define quality indicators for the certification of specialized units in dermatology; the first 2 areas selected were psoriasis and dermato-oncology. The aim of this study was to reach a consensus on what should be assessed by the indicators used to certify psoriasis units. The structured process used to do this comprised a literature review to identify potential indicators, the selection of an initial set of indicators to be evaluated by a multidisciplinary group of experts and, finally, a Delphi consensus study. A panel of 39 dermatologists evaluated the selected indicators and classified them as either "essential" or "of excellence". Consensus was finally reached on 67 indicators, which will be standardized and used to develop the certification standard for psoriasis units.

[Translated article] Selection of Quality Indicators for the Certification of Psoriasis Units: The CUDERMA Project Delphi Consensus Study

Defining quality indicators is a key strategy for ensuring the quality and standardization of health care. The CUDERMA project, an initiative of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venerology (AEDV), was undertaken to define quality indicators for the certification of specialized units in dermatology; the first 2 areas selected were psoriasis and dermato-oncology. The aim of this study was to reach a consensus on what should be assessed by the indicators used to certify psoriasis units. The structured process used to do this comprised a literature review to identify potential indicators, the selection of an initial set of indicators to be evaluated by a multidisciplinary group of experts and, finally, a Delphi consensus study. A panel of 39 dermatologists evaluated the selected indicators and classified them as either "essential" or "of excellence". Consensus was finally reached on 67 indicators, which will be standardized and used to develop the certification standard for psoriasis units.

Treatment outcomes of secukinumab in adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in China: A real-world multicenter retrospective study

Secukinumab is effective in treating patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. However, most studies assessing its effectiveness in routine clinical settings in China are mostly single-center studies with a limited sample size. The objective of this study was to assess secukinumab's efficacy, treatment patterns, and characteristics in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. This 24-week, multicenter (n = 5) retrospective study analyzed the data of Chinese adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who initiated secukinumab treatment between May 2019 and March 2020. The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), body surface area (BSA), Investigator's Global Assessment Modified 2011 (IGA mod 2011), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were assessed. Dermatologists documented the treatment dosage and modification reasons. Of the 244 secukinumab-naïve patients, most were men (73.4%, 179/244) and weighed 60-90 kg (72.8%, 177/243). The mean (SD) age at secukinumab initiation was 38.1 (11.6) years, and the disease duration was 13.5 (7.9) years. Most patients (97.1%, 237/244) received secukinumab 300 mg. At weeks 4, 12, 16, and 24, the proportion of patients achieving PASI 75 (≥75% reduction from baseline) was 40.0%, 92.1%, 88.4%, and 88.9%, respectively; PASI 90 was 15.0%, 73.7%, 81.4%, and 68.3%, respectively; and PASI 100 was 8.7%, 40.8%, 58.1%, and 41.3%, respectively. During the same periods, BSA and IGA mod 2011 showed similar improvement trends. An increasing proportion of patients achieved DLQI of 0-1 (21.6%, 65.7%, 75.0%, and 80.3%, respectively). Treatment modification was highest at week 12. The average interval between two administrations after week 4 was 62.95 days. Secukinumab was highly effective in improving the PASI, IGA, BSA, and DLQI in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis throughout the first 24 weeks. The treatment pattern for Chinese patients differs from that in the clinical guidelines.

Predicting Hepatotoxicity Associated with Low-Dose Methotrexate Using Machine Learning

An accurate prediction of the hepatotoxicity associated with low-dose methotrexate can provide evidence for a reasonable treatment choice. This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based prediction model to predict hepatotoxicity associated with low-dose methotrexate and explore the associated risk factors. Eligible patients with immune system disorders, who received low-dose methotrexate at West China Hospital between 1 January 2018, and 31 December 2019, were enrolled. A retrospective review of the included patients was conducted. Risk factors were selected from multiple patient characteristics, including demographics, admissions, and treatments. Eight algorithms, including eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), AdaBoost, CatBoost, Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Tree-based Pipeline Optimization Tool (TPOT), Random Forest (RF), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN), were used to establish the prediction model. A total of 782 patients were included, and hepatotoxicity was detected in 35.68% (279/782) of the patients. The Random Forest model with the best predictive capacity was chosen to establish the prediction model (receiver operating characteristic curve 0.97, accuracy 64.33%, precision 50.00%, recall 32.14%, and F1 39.13%). Among the 15 risk factors, the highest score was a body mass index of 0.237, followed by age (0.198), the number of drugs (0.151), and the number of comorbidities (0.144). These factors demonstrated their importance in predicting hepatotoxicity associated with low-dose methotrexate. Using machine learning, this novel study established a predictive model for low-dose methotrexate-related hepatotoxicity. The model can improve medication safety in patients taking methotrexate in clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of biologics and small molecules for psoriasis in pediatric and geriatric populations. Part II: focus on elderly patients

INTRODUCTION

The management of moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis is becoming a frequent concern in geriatric age due to the higher risk to develop treatment adverse events, logistic issues, vulnerability to immune-related diseases and cancer, presence of comorbidities and the risk of drug interactions. In this context, traditional systemic treatments are often contraindicated, and biologic drugs and small molecules seem to be a valuable option. However, data on their effectiveness and safety in elderly patients are scant.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to analyze the current literature in order to point out data on the efficacy and safety of biologic drugs and small molecules for the management of psoriasis in elderly patients in order to put the basis for universally shared treatment algorithm following available evidence. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used for the literature research.

EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY

Our review suggests biologics and small molecules as an effective and safe option for the management of moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis in elderly patients.

Evaluating the benefits of TNF-alfa inhibitor biosimilar competition on off-patent and on-patent drug markets: A Southern European analysis

Background: The level of competition achieved following biosimilars market availability varies by country, care setting and molecule. Hence, biosimilars contribution to attaining price reductions and extended access to treatments can also vary. Objective: The aim of this study is to capture market dynamics for tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors and competing molecules in Southern European markets (2011-2020), and to evaluate the benefits of the competition generated by the availability of biosimilars. Methods: This study is based on a literature review examining market characteristics for TNF-alfa inhibitors and competing immunomodulator molecules, and on the quantitative analysis of market data for these molecules in Italy, Portugal and Spain. Results: Following biosimilars availability in Italian, Portuguese and Spanish markets, there has been an expansion in the overall access to TNF-alfa inhibitor pharmaceuticals. Further, savings have been generated within the TNF-alfa inhibitors class even after the increased use of these molecules. However, the potential of infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab biosimilars to generate price competition outside of their own drug class appeared limited in the studied markets. Considering this limitation and that shifts towards on-patent and higher-cost therapies have occurred after TNF-alfa inhibitor biosimilars availability, the importance of investing in biosimilars development for still on-patent immunology biologics is emphasized. Conclusion: This study highlights the need for policies that do not only seek higher utilization of biosimilars, but that also support a sustainable market for these products. This is expected to foster the future development of biosimilar medicines.

Efficacy and Safety of Dimethyl Fumarate in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Results from a 52-Week Open-Label Phase IV Clinical Trial (DIMESKIN 1)

INTRODUCTION

Although dimethyl fumarate (DMF) has been approved since 2017 for treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, limited data on its safety and efficacy are available in clinical practice. The objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of DMF in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis through 52 weeks in conditions close to real clinical practice.

METHODS

DIMESKIN 1 was a 52-week, open-label, phase IV clinical trial conducted at 36 Spanish sites. Adults with diagnosis of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, treated with DMF as per its summary of product characteristics and with ≥ 1 post-baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) value were included [intention-to-treat (ITT) population]. Efficacy analyses were performed for ITT population and are based on multiple imputation.

RESULTS

Overall, 282 and 274 patients were included in the safety and ITT populations, respectively. At week 24, 46.0%/24.8%/10.9% of patients achieved PASI 75/90/100 response, respectively. At week 52, these percentages were 46.0%/21.9%/10.9%, respectively. Mean body surface area affected decreased from 17.4% to 6.9%/7.3% after 24/52 weeks (p < 0.001, both). A total of 42.9%/49.4% of patients had a Physician's Global Assessment 0-1 at week 24/52, respectively. Mean pruritus visual analogue scale (VAS) significantly decreased after 24 and 52 weeks (p < 0.001, both), with 56.5% and 67.6% of patients, respectively, rating a pruritus VAS < 3. At week 24/52, 61.3%/73.4% patients had a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ≤ 5 and 34.7%/32.1% had a DLQI 0-1. The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders (mainly diarrhea/abdominal pain in 50.0%/35.1% of patients, respectively), flushing (28.0%), and lymphopenia (31.2%), mostly mild/moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

DMF significantly improves main severity and extension indexes and rates, as well as patient-reported outcomes such as pruritus and quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis after 24 weeks of treatment. These improvements are sustained through 52 weeks. The safety profile of DMF is similar to that previously described for fumarates.

EUDRACT NUMBER

2017-00136840.

Treating psoriasis in the elderly: biologics and small molecules

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis prevalence in the elderly is growing. It is estimated that 15% of elderly psoriasis patients suffer from moderate-to-severe disease, thus requiring systemic treatments. However, conventional systemic agents' use is limited due to contraindications and drug-interactions. Conversely, biologics and small molecules seem to be a valuable option, although the geriatric psoriasis population is frequently excluded from trials and shared guidelines are lacking.

AREAS COVERED

Relevant English literature (trials, real-life studies, case series, and reviews) regarding biologics and/or small molecules in the elderly were searched for up to January 17, 2022.

EXPERT OPINION

Treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the elderly may be challenging due to multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy, and increased risk of infections and cancers. However, new targeted therapies offer the possibility to perform a tailored-tail management, considering comorbidities, drug-interactions, and frailties which characterize this class of patients. Several real-world data support biologics and small molecules' efficacy and safety in the elderly with mainly no significant difference as compared to young adults. Elderly psoriasis patients' expectations are as high as those of their younger counterparts. Hence, they deserve the best therapeutic options according to their peculiarities for a long-term psoriasis remission and an improved quality of life.

Pretreatment with an Aerosol Foam Containing Calcipotriene and Betamethasone Strongly Improves the Efficacy of Narrow-Band UVB Phototherapy

BACKGROUND

Narrow-band (NB) UVB has been combined with a number of topical treatments. However, there have been no specific data regarding treatment results of a fixed combination of calcipotriene 50 μg/g plus betamethasone 0.5 mg/g aerosol foam (Cal/BD) combined with NB-UVB phototherapy so far.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of Cal/BD foam coupled to twice-weekly NB-UVB and whether this combined regimen requires fewer UVB treatments and a lower cumulative UVB dose compared to phototherapy alone.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, prospective, parallel-group study enrolled 187 consecutive moderate-to-severe psoriatic patients who were allocated to two groups in a 1:2 ratio. The overall duration of the treatment cycle was 12 weeks. At baseline and after 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks, we registered the modified (not considering head lesions) PASI, the number of Cal/BD applications, the NRS score for itching and the adverse effects.

RESULTS

The combined regimen was more effective in clearing psoriasis [final mPASI: 2.1 (0; 8.2) versus 4.4 (0; 19.6); p < 0.01] and reducing itching [(final NRS score for itching: 0 (0; 3) versus 1 (0; 4); p < 0.01]. Fewer exposures [12 (4; 20) versus 24 (8; 24); p < 0.01] and a lower cumulative UVB dose [6.1 (5.4; 9.3) J cm^-2 versus 13.1 (9.8; 19.7) J cm^-2; p < 0.01] were required. A higher number of patients achieved complete clearance [47 (74.6%) versus 58 (46.8%) patients (p < 0.001)]. Both treatments were well tolerated without acute adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Cal/BD + NB-UVB is a very effective treatment that produces a rapid improvement in clinical lesions and itching and can be considered a valuable alternative to systemic treatments for psoriasis.

Value of PASI90 Versus Merit-Based Incentive Payment System Efficacy Measures

Background

Achieving ≥90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI90) is achievable with newer biologic therapies, such as ixekizumab. Standard of care payment systems such as the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) responder criteria could lead to under treatment and lower quality of life (QoL) outcomes compared with PASI90.

Objective

Show PASI90 is a higher standard than MIPS and is associated with greater improvements in QoL and other PRO outcomes.

Methods

Patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis meeting PASI90 and MIPS criteria were compared in 3 phase 3 clinical trials of the interleukin-17A inhibitor ixekizumab (pooled UNCOVER-2/3 and IXORA-S). Patients satisfying MIPS criteria met either static Physician Global Assessment score ≤2, body surface area <3%, PASI <3, or Dermatology Life Quality Index ≤5. Improvements in QoL were compared between patients meeting PASI90 and MIPS criteria.

Results

All PASI90 responders were also MIPS responders (PASI90 responders). Not all MIPS responders met PASI90 (MIPS-only responders). Significantly larger change from baseline improvements for all health (skin pain, Itch NRS, DLQI, PtGA, WPAI-PsO work productivity loss, and WPAI-PsO activity impairment) and quality of life (EQ-5D 5L VAS and acute SF-36 PCS/MCS) outcome measures were observed in the PASI90 responders vs the MIPS-only responders.

Conclusion

PASI90 is a higher standard of response than MIPS and is associated with greater improvements in health and quality of life outcome measures.

Dimethyl Fumarate as Therapeutic Alternative in Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Our Experience

Purpose

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is an oral formulation approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in adult patients requiring systemic therapy. Here, we describe our clinical experience with DMF for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Spain.

Patients and Methods

This is a retrospective study including 30 adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis under treatment with DMF between September 2018 and January 2020. Patients were treated with DMF as per its Summary of Product Characteristics and the median duration of treatment was 15 weeks (4-55 weeks). Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and body surface area (BSA) severity scales were evaluated from baseline to week 36 and adverse events (AEs) developed during treatment were described.

Results

The efficacy of DMF was assessed at week 8 and at week 36 (n = 5), both PASI and BSA were 0. At week 24, median PASI showed a decrease in both the last observation carried forward (LOCF; n = 23) and the observed cases (OC) (n = 10): from 10 to 6 and from 10 to 1.5, respectively. Median BSA also showed a decrease from 19 to 10 in LOCF and from 17 to 3 in OC. The most frequent AEs were diarrhoea (40.0%), flushing (13.3%) and lymphopenia (3.3%). In 47.1% patients, AEs have been solved by adjusting the DMF dose. Treatment discontinuation rate due to AEs was 43.3%.

Conclusion

Our clinical experience indicates that DMF could be an effective and safe treatment for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in adult patients.

The impact of gender and sex in psoriasis: What to be aware of when treating women with psoriasis

Psoriasis is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease with an exceptionally high burden for women.

A real-world, non-interventional, prospective study of the effectiveness and safety of apremilast in bio-naïve adults with moderate plaque psoriasis treated in the routine care in Greece - The 'APRAISAL' study

BACKGROUND

Real-world data in patients with moderate psoriasis treated with apremilast is limited.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of apremilast in bio-naïve patients with moderate psoriasis in real-world clinical settings.

METHODS

This was a 52-week multicenter, observational, prospective study of adult outpatients with moderate psoriasis {[10%<body surface area<20% or 10<psoriasis area severity index (PASI)<20] and 10<dermatology quality of life index (DLQI)<20} initiated on apremilast ≤7 days before enrollment. Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward method.

RESULTS

A total of 287 eligible patients (median age: 54.2 years; median psoriasis duration: 9.8 years) were consecutively enrolled. At baseline, the median DLQI and PASI scores were 12.0 and 11.8, respectively. The 52-week DLQI ≤5 and PASI75 response rates were 68.3% and 61.0%. At 52 weeks, 70.8% and 72.7% of the patients shifted from moderate/severe/very severe to clear/minimal scalp and palmoplantar psoriasis involvement, respectively; the pruritus severity state improved in 67.2%. The 52-week Kaplan-Meier estimated drug continuation rate was 85.3%. The adverse drug reaction rate was 19.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Apremilast is a safe and effective treatment for bio-naïve patients with moderate psoriasis and specific psoriasis manifestations.

Practical update of the Recommendations Published by the Psoriasis Group of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (GPS) on the Treatment of Psoriasis with Biologic Therapy. Part 1. Concepts and General Management of Psoriasis with Biologic Therapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A new, updated AEDV Psoriasis Group consensus document on the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis was needed owing to the approval, in recent years, of a large number of new drugs and changes in the treatment paradigm.

METHODOLOGY

The consensus document was developed using the nominal group technique and a scoping review. First, a designated coordinator selected a group of Psoriasis Group members for the panel. The coordinator defined the objectives and key points for the document and, with the help of a documentalist, conducted a scoping review of articles in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to January 2021. The review included systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical trials not included in those studies and high-quality real-world studies. National and international clinical practice guidelines and consensus documents on the management of moderate to severe psoriasis were also reviewed. Based on these reviews, the coordinator drew up a set of proposed recommendations, which were then discussed and modified in a nominal group meeting. After several review processes, including external review by other GPs members, the final document was drafted.

RESULTS

The present guidelines include general principles for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis and also define treatment goals and criteria for the indication of biologic therapy and the selection of initial and subsequent therapies. Practical issues, such as treatment failure and maintenance of response, are also addressed.

Effectiveness and Safety of Secukinumab for Psoriasis in a Real-World Clinical Setting in the Asia-Pacific and Middle East Regions: Results from the REALIA Study

INTRODUCTION

Secukinumab has demonstrated sustained long-term efficacy with a favourable safety profile in various manifestations of psoriatic disease. We investigated effectiveness and safety of secukinumab, other biologics and conventional systemic therapies in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis in a real-world setting.

METHODS

REALIA was a non-interventional, multicentre, prospective, parallel group study. Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years old with chronic plaque psoriasis commencing a new treatment with a biologic agent or conventional systemic therapies.

RESULTS

At baseline, 541 patients were divided into three cohorts based on treatment initiated: conventional systemics (173), secukinumab (184) and other biologics (184). A significantly higher proportion of patients achieved almost clear to clear skin based on physician's judgement in secukinumab versus conventional systemics at month 3 (64.7% versus 22.8%, P < 0.001) and month 6 (61.8% versus 20.8%, P < 0.001). At month 12, clear to almost clear skin was achieved by 52.1% of the patients in secukinumab versus 35.8% in conventional systemics (P = 0.066). The proportion of patients achieving Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 90 on conventional systemics, secukinumab and other biologics was 18.8%, 59.7% and 40.0% at month 3 and 35.3%, 60.8% and 50.0% at month 12, respectively. Secukinumab patients showed significantly higher change in PASI total score from baseline versus conventional systemics at month 3 {least squares [LS] mean [standard error (SE)]: -14.49 [0.648] versus -8.48 [1.149], P < 0.001} and numerically higher [LS mean (SE): -13.60 (0.475) versus -10.84 (1.733), P = 0.122] at month 12. The proportion of patients with Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 score on conventional systemics, secukinumab and other biologics was 22.6%, 65.0% and 41.6% at month 3 and 32.0%, 63.5% and 41.3% at month 12, respectively. Safety profile was comparable across cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Secukinumab is effective and well tolerated in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis in a real-world setting in an Asia-Pacific and Middle East population, and these results are in agreement with clinical outcomes of secukinumab reported in randomised clinical trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

170803-001645.

Current evidence on the use of the adalimumab biosimilar SB5 (ImraldiTM): a multidisciplinary perspective

INTRODUCTION

This review provides an overview of data from trials and real-world studies available for SB5 (Imraldi^TM) across three main therapeutic areas: rheumatology, gastroenterology, and dermatology.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search for publications on data for SB5 efficacy/effectiveness, safety, and immunogenicity was undertaken.

EXPERT OPINION

Evidence derived from clinical studies suggest that the biosimilar SB5 is a safe and effective alternative to reference adalimumab. Considering that patients suffering from immune-mediated inflammatory diseases such as inflammatory arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and psoriasis often require long-term biologic treatment, biosimilar medicines (such as SB5) can reduce healthcare costs while increasing access to effective treatments.

Therapeutic goals and treatment response evaluation in moderate to severe psoriasis: an experts opinion document

OBJECTIVE

To critically analyse and define therapeutic objectives, response to treatment evaluation and related decisions in psoriasis.

METHODS

Expert consensus meetings, a systematic and narrative reviews and a collaborative Delphi procedure were carried out. A steering committee from the Spanish Group of Psoriasis was established who based on the reviews generated a set of related statements. Subsequently, a group of 40 experts tested their agreement with the statements, through 3 Delphi rounds.

RESULTS

We found a great variability in clinical guidelines regarding to the definition of treatment goal and the response. In general, treatment failure was considered if a PASI50 is not achieved. The panel of experts agreed on (1) clearly differentiate between ideal and a realistic goals when establishing the therapeutic goal in moderate to severe psoriasis; (2) treatment goals should be in general established regardless of the type of drug for psoriasis; (3) treatment failure if PASI75 response is not reached; (4) an absolute PASI is in general preferred to the rate of PASI improvement from baseline; (5) disease characteristics, patients and physicians opinions/needs and treatment adherence influence treatment goals.

CONCLUSIONS

A clear treatment decision making framework is vital to improve management of psoriasis.KEY MESSAGESPsoriasis characteristics, patients and physicians opinions/needs and treatment adherence influence treatment goals.Different disease indexes could be used to assess treatment response but absolute PASI is preferredIn general psoriasis treatment failure should be considered if PASI75 response is not reached.

[Treatment of psoriasis with secukinumab : Practical guidance]

BACKGROUND

Moderate to severe plaque psoriasis can be treated effectively with immunomodulating biologicals such as the interleukin-17A inhibitor secukinumab. In practice, however, questions often arise as to how to proceed in special situations, such as infections, comorbidity, pregnancy, or surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To address frequent questions about the treatment of plaque psoriasis with secukinumab in a consensus document of German psoriasis experts that supplements current guidelines.

METHODS

In a virtual expert meeting in May 2020, practical aspects of the treatment of psoriasis were discussed based on the experience of the participants and on current literature. The results of this discussion were summarized in the present consensus document.

RESULTS

This article provides practical guidance on case history, documentation of previous therapies, severity of psoriasis, and comorbidities before starting therapy with secukinumab. For patients treated with secukinumab, the course of action in case of vaccinations, chronic or acute infections, surgical interventions, special manifestations of psoriasis, and comorbidities including history of cancer and autoimmune disorders is discussed. Questions regarding family planning and health policy regulations are also addressed.

DISCUSSION

The recommendations for the treatment of psoriasis with secukinumab summarized in this consensus document may contribute to achieve optimal therapy for patients and to improve their quality of life.

The Effect of TNF-α Inhibitors on Nail Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis-Real-World Data from Dermatology Practice

Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) often develop joint symptoms years after their initial diagnosis of psoriasis disease; therefore, dermatologists should test for and detect PsA early. In this study, we focused on patients with psoriasis with both nail and joint disease being treated with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors by dermatologists. We performed a noninterventional, prospective, multicenter, and open-label study to evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab over 24 months of continuous therapy in patients with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis (Pso) and PsA. Disease assessments with the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI), joint assessment, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) instruments were performed every 3 months for the first year and twice annually thereafter. The cohort included 100 patients with Pso, nail psoriasis, and PsA. A significant reduction of NAPSI was observed 3 months after therapy initiation compared with the baseline (mean ± SD, 22.9 ± 17.8 vs. 33.8 ± 21.4; p < 0.001). Similarly, the mean ± SD number of both tender and swollen joints decreased significantly within the first 3 months of treatment, from 10.8 ± 11.5 to 6.4 ± 10.3 (p < 0.001) and from 6.4 ± 9.5 to 3.1 ± 7.2 (p < 0.001), respectively. Additionally, the distal interphalangeal joint involvement improved throughout the observation time, and DLQI and HAQ scores decreased. Improvements in control of skin, nail, and joint symptoms were seen, as well as in patients’ quality of life and functionality. Dermatologists have an important role not only in PsA diagnosis but also in PsA long-term care.

Evolution of Patient Perceptions of Psoriatic Disease: Results from the Understanding Psoriatic Disease Leveraging Insights for Treatment (UPLIFT) Survey

INTRODUCTION

Since the 2012 Multinational Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (MAPP) survey, several systemic treatments for psoriasis (PsO) and/or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have been approved. The population-based UPLIFT survey was conducted to understand how perceptions of treatment-related outcomes have evolved, particularly for patients with mild to moderate PsO and/or PsA and their dermatologists.

METHODS

This population- and web-based survey was conducted from 2 March to 3 June 2020, in North America, Europe, and Japan. Adults with self-reported healthcare practitioner (HCP)-diagnosed PsO and/or PsA and dermatologists who spent > 50% of time treating patients and treated ≥ 20 patients with PsO, including plaque PsO, per month were included. Patient participants were recruited at random from online panels; dermatologists were recruited randomly from representative physician panels.

RESULTS

Of 264,054 patient responses, 3806 who self-reported an HCP diagnosis of PsO and/or PsA were included in the final sample; 67% had PsO alone, 28% had PsO and PsA, and 5% had PsA alone. The estimated population prevalence of psoriatic disease was 7% (PsO only: 4%; PsO and PsA: 2%; PsA only: 1%). Most patients (78%) reported PsO-involved body surface area (BSA) ≤ 3 palms, and ~ 90% or more reported itching, redness, flaking, and scales. Many PsO patients without diagnosed PsA reported musculoskeletal symptoms suggestive of PsA (63%). Across BSA categories, approximately one in four patients was not currently receiving treatment and > 50% had Dermatology Life Quality Index score > 5. Patients and dermatologists had different perceptions of PsO severity, office visit discussions, treatment goals, and treatment satisfaction. The survey was conducted during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which could have affected assessments of patient-reported outcomes and ability to have in-person HCP visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PsO and PsA in UPLIFT reported high disease burden, including patients with limited skin involvement. An opportunity exists to align patient and dermatologist perceptions to optimize management of PsO and PsA.

Systemic Management of Psoriasis Patients in Indian Scenario: An Expert Consensus

Background:

Psoriasis is a common inflammatory disease with significant comorbidities, and regardless of its extent, it affects the patients' quality of life. The various modalities of treating psoriasis comprise topical or systemic medications, phototherapy, and an array of biologic agents. There is a lack of Indian recommendations on the management of psoriasis with these different modalities and challenges faced by the clinicians in day-to-day practice.

Aim:

To develop India-specific consensus for systemic management of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Method and Results:

A panel of dermatology experts, based on the evidence and international recommendations, coupled with their own clinical experience, developed recommendations for systemic management of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Conclusion:

These recommendations are meant to provide guidance in terms of choice of systemic therapies, dosing, effectiveness, and safety. It also addresses clinical challenges that may be experienced during psoriasis management.

Treatment Patterns and Resource Utilization of Pregnant Women with Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases or Psoriasis in Germany: A Claims Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled inflammatory disease activity can impact pregnancy outcomes and the health of the mother and child. This retrospective claims database analysis assessed treatment patterns before, during, and after pregnancy among women with inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD; axial spondyloarthritis [axSpA], psoriatic arthritis [PsA], and rheumatoid arthritis [RA]) or psoriasis (PSO) in Germany.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the BARMER sickness fund (2013-2017). Pregnant women (18-45 years) with documented IRD or PSO diagnoses were compared with age-matched controls from the same database for the analysis of patient characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, and pharmacological treatment during pregnancy. Reported measures included the proportion of women with pharmacological prescriptions or hospitalization/new prescription of corticosteroids or biologics in the 180 days before pregnancy, during pregnancy, and 180 days after delivery. Pre-specified prescription categories (such as disease-specific drugs [not including biologics]) were identified by anatomical therapeutic chemical classification codes. Extrapolated values to the German statutory health insurance population are reported.

RESULTS

Overall, 2702 pregnant women with IRD (axSpA: 1063; PsA: 660; RA: 979) and 6527 with PSO were identified. The proportion of women with IRD receiving prescriptions for disease-specific drugs reduced during pregnancy and remained stable after delivery (before: 15.0%; during: 9.0%; after: 9.7%). The proportion of women with PSO receiving prescriptions for disease-specific drugs was low (before: 0.6%; during: 0.3%; after: 0.1%). The proportion of women with hospitalization/new prescription of corticosteroids or biologics decreased during pregnancy, compared with pre-pregnancy, and increased after delivery in women with IRD (before: 9.0%; during: 5.1%; after: 11.1%) and PSO (before: 3.5%; during: 1.9%; after: 2.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

A reduction in pharmacological treatment during pregnancy was observed for women with IRD in Germany. Many women with IRD did not return to pre-pregnancy treatments after delivery, despite signs of disease exacerbation, such as hospitalization and initiation of treatment with corticosteroids/biologics, in this period.

The Use of Apremilast in Psoriasis: An Indian Perspective on Real-World Scenarios

Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, is approved for use in the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Although its efficacy and safety have been well established in clinical studies, in real-world settings, different practice scenarios have been reported. This review paper serves to evaluate clinical real-world scenarios and aspects of treatment for which the information in the literature was considered to be lacking or controversial. Following a literature review, a panel of five dermatologists with expertise in psoriasis considered five scenarios; namely, the positioning of apremilast in psoriasis, its use in difficult-to-treat areas, special conditions and populations, safety, dose titration and dose in maintenance therapy. These were then assessed with psoriasis experts in India using a web-based questionnaire. A total of 28 questions were discussed regarding these scenarios. According to the responses, apremilast is effective in stable mild to moderate psoriasis as monotherapy and in severe psoriasis in combination. Also, a positive response was received with regard to its effectiveness in difficult locations such as the scalp, palms and soles. To reduce adverse effects, prolonged titration therapy over 4 weeks is required and lower doses can be prescribed to maintain remission. Apremilast therapy should be continued for a minimum of 8 weeks once initiated to achieve the desired results, and the total duration of therapy should be about 24 weeks for better efficacy. It is also effective in many other cases, such as obese patients, patients with hepatitis B or C and HIV, or patients on polypharmacy. It was also reported that apremilast requires less prescreening and monitoring than other conventional and biologic systemic therapies. Overall, apremilast is an attractive option for the individualized treatment of psoriasis owing to its favorable safety profile, its ease of oral administration without the need for screening or ongoing laboratory monitoring, and its positive impact on symptoms and lesions in difficult-to-treat areas.

Apremilast for genital erosive lichen planus in women (the AP-GELP Study): study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial

Background

Genital erosive lichen planus (GELP) is a genital subtype of lichen planus, a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease of unknown aetiology. In women, GELP is characterised by painful vulvo-vaginal mucosal erosions and scarring, often resulting in poor sexual health and reduced quality of life. Treatment options are limited and often with little effect. Apremilast, a phosphodiesterase 4-inhibitor, has been shown to have a positive effect on psoriasis and other inflammatory skin diseases. We aim to investigate the effect and safety of peroral apremilast in women with GELP in a randomised placebo-controlled double-blinded clinical trial.

Methods

We will recruit 42 adult women with characteristic clinical and/or histological features of moderate-to-severe GELP from a specialised vulva clinic in Oslo, Norway. The patients will be randomised 1:1 to either apremilast 30 mg BID (with an initial dose titration on days 1–6) or a placebo for 24 weeks. The concomitant use of topical corticosteroids will be allowed. The primary end point will be the mean GELP score, a clinical scoring system, at week 24 in the apremilast-treated patients versus the placebo-treated patients. The secondary end points will include the mean GELP score improvement from weeks 0 to 24, patient-reported use of topical steroids, the pain score on a visual analogue scale and the number of patients with GELP score improvements at weeks 16 and 24. The Physician Global Assessment , Patient Global Assessment and selected quality of life and sexual function assessments will be recorded at weeks 0, 16 and 24. The exploratory endpoints include description of immunohistochemical changes before and after apremilast therapy, assessed in vulvar or vaginal biopsies at weeks 0 and 24. Regular follow-ups for possible adverse events will be conducted.

Discussion

The study design is based on experience from studies on apremilast in other inflammatory skin diseases using equivalent apremilast doses for approved indications. The trial may provide evidence for the use of apremilast in women with this burdensome genital dermatosis.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.govNCT0365666. Registered on 4 September 2018.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05428-w.

Saudi consensus statement on biologic treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis (2020)

Psoriasis is a common chronic and complex inflammatory skin disease that affects over 125 million people worldwide. Management of psoriasis in daily clinical practice in Saudi Arabia is variable. Local preferences for management differ, which may have a bearing on the treatment selection. Biologic therapy is now a well-established strategy for managing moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. There is a clear need for national consensus statements due to the extended role and high availability of literature on these agents. As a result of an initiative of the Ministry of Health, a multidisciplinary expert panel of dermatologists and pharmacists with practical experience in the clinical management of psoriasis were invited to be part of a work group to update the previous practical guidelines on the biologic treatment of psoriasis published in the Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 2014. The overall aim of this consensus document is to deliver evidence-based recommendations on the use, screening, and monitoring of biologic therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. These recommendations also address the use of biologic therapy in special patient populations. They were developed after rigorous evaluation of existing international guidelines as well as the latest emerging evidence. Updates of the present consensus document will be provided as needed to incorporate new data or agents.

Three-year efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: results from the randomized phase 3 CIMPACT trial

Background

Certolizumab pegol (CZP) is an Fc‐free, PEGylated anti‐tumor necrosis factor biologic.

Objectives

To report 3‐year outcomes from the CIMPACT (NCT02346240) phase 3, CZP in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, randomized controlled trial.

Methods

Adults were randomized 3:3:3:1 to CZP 200 mg every other week (Q2W), CZP 400 mg Q2W, etanercept biweekly or placebo. At Week 16, CZP‐ and etanercept‐treated PASI 75 responders were re‐randomized to CZP 200 mg Q2W, CZP 400 mg Q4W, CZP 400 mg Q2W or placebo for maintenance treatment; PASI 75 non‐responders entered an open‐label escape CZP 400 mg Q2W arm. Patients entering the open‐label extension (OLE; Weeks 48–144) from blinded treatment received CZP 200 mg Q2W.

Results

Double‐blinded results have been reported previously. 261 patients received 200 mg Q2W upon OLE entry. PASI 75 response was maintained in patients continuing 200 mg Q2W treatment through Weeks 16–144 (Week 144: 96.2%). In patients dosed down at Week 48 (double‐blinded 400 mg to 200 mg Q2W), PASI 75 decreased (Week 48: 98.7%; Week 144: 85.9%). In patients who received placebo through Weeks 16–48, PASI 75 response decreased (Week 48: 60.4%), then increased following Week 48 switch to 200 mg Q2W (Week 144: 95.1%). 48 and 36 patients initially randomized to 200 and 400 mg Q2W, respectively, were Week 16 PASI 75 non‐responders and entered the escape arm; at Week 144, 71.8% and 78.2% achieved PASI 75. No new safety signals were identified.

Conclusions

Response to CZP was durable over three years; no new safety signals were identified.

Reaching Treatment Goals in Psoriasis with Conventional Systemic Drugs: How Long Are We Willing to Wait?

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the attainment of treatment goals according to the European Consensus Programme (ECP-TGs) from 2011 in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis (Pso) treated with the first conventional systemic therapy and to identify factors that might compromise the attainment of these treatment goals.

METHODS

In a multicenter, prospective observational study, patients with moderate to severe Pso, defined as either body surface area (BSA) >10% or psoriasis area severity index (PASI) >10 and dermatology life quality index (DLQI) >10, received a conventional systemic therapy that could be modified at each follow-up visit over the course of 18 months. All subjects signed an informed consent form, were ≥18 years of age as well as systemic therapy naïve, and had regular study visits at months 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 after baseline. Among others and in addition to demographic and disease-related characteristics at baseline, we documented BSA, PASI, DLQI, and the physician-reported attainment of treatment goals at each follow-up visit. Factors related to a failure in achieving the ECP-TGs (i.e., either Δ PASI ≥75 or Δ PASI ≥50 and <75 with a DLQI ≤5) at month 18 were investigated by multiple logistic regression. Descriptive results are presented as the mean ± SD for interval data, and absolute as well as relative frequencies for nominal data. For this part of the analysis, data at baseline and months 6, 12, and 18 are presented.

RESULTS

A total of 133 Pso patients with a mean age and disease duration of 49.5 ± 14.4 and 15.6 ± 12.8 years, respectively, were included in the analysis; 54.1% (n = 72) were male. The mean baseline disease-related outcomes were: BSA: 21.5 ± 15.8%, PASI: 13.7 ± 7.14, and DLQI: 12.0 ± 6.11. The most common conventional systemic therapies initiated at baseline were fumaric acid esters (n = 74, 55.6%), methotrexate (n = 46, 34,6%), and ciclosporin (n = 6, 4.5%). The ECP-TGs were achieved by 58 patients (43.6%) at month 6, 86 patients (64.7%) at month 12, and 97 patients (72.9%) at month 18. An optimized reduced logistic regression model identified the presence of onycholysis/nail dystrophy at two or more digits to be associated with failing to attain the ECP-TGs (OR 10.7, 95% CI 2.5-46.7, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Patients with onycholysis/nail dystrophy at two or more digits were identified as having a higher risk of not achieving ECP-TGs under conventional systemic therapy. The ECP-TGs from 2011 were attained by 43.6% of our patients 6 months after starting conventional systemic therapies. In the era of safe, fast, and efficacious Pso therapies, much higher treatment goals might be achieved during therapy. New treatment goals are only of use if patients and dermatologists strive to attain them.

Comparison of guidelines for the use of Ustekinumab for psoriasis in the United States, Europe, and the United Kingdom: A critical appraisal and comprehensive review

The aim of this review is to compare and contrast evidence-based clinical practice guidelines from global dermatological organizations for the use of ustekinumab in psoriasis. Clinical practice guidelines from the American Academy of Dermatology, National Psoriasis Foundation, British Association of Dermatologists, and European S3 were reviewed and compared. Practice guidelines from the three dermatological organizations are similar with regards to treatment dosage and initiation but differ in their recommendations for baseline screening and interval laboratory monitoring, treatment in patients undergoing surgery or receiving live vaccines, and treatment contraindications. Ustekinumab is an effective and well-tolerated systemic treatment for patients with psoriasis and should be considered in the line of therapy that dermatologists discuss with their patients. Consideration should be given to evidence-based practice guidelines of global dermatology organizations to effectively guide treatment decisions in patients with psoriasis.

Off-Patent Biological and Biosimilar Medicines in Belgium: A Market Landscape Analysis

Background and objective: Best-value biological medicines may generate competition in the off-patent biologicals market, resulting in having more resources available to provide patients with access to necessary medicines while maintaining high-quality care. Belgium is a country known to have low biosimilar market shares, suggesting a malfunctioning market for off-patent biologicals. This study aims to gain an in-depth understanding of the Belgian off-patent biologicals market, by looking at the evolution in volumes and costs of the relevant products in the market. Methods: This study included a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods. The quantitative part of this study consisted of the analysis of market data obtained by the National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI) for all relevant products in the Belgian off-patent biologicals market (i.e. TNF-inhibitors, insulins, granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, epoetins, rituximab, trastuzumab). In addition, for the qualitative part of this study, semi-structured interviews with Belgian stakeholders were conducted between December 2019 and March 2020. Results: Belgian market data and stakeholder perceptions suggest a suboptimal market environment for off-patent biological and biosimilar medicines. Shifts are observed after loss of exclusivities of originator biologicals toward second-generation products or new therapeutic class products, at a higher cost and often limited added value. Moreover, cost reductions for off-patent biologicals after biosimilar market entry are mainly determined by mandatory price reductions applicable to both originator and biosimilar products, and not by lower prices induced by competition. For products used in the retail setting, significant mandatory price reductions for both originator and reference products with low biosimilar volumes were pointed out as the main reasons for the lack of price competition. For products dispensed in hospitals, the hospital financing system is important. First, it does not always encourage the use of lower cost alternatives. Second, competition mainly takes place at the level of confidential discounts in tenders. Most interviewees acknowledged the lack of a competitive environment, which is not supportive of a sustainable Belgian off-patent biologicals market. Conclusion: Market data and stakeholder perceptions indicate that the sustainability of the Belgian market for off-patent biologicals is challenged. A sustainable market ensures access to biological therapies now and in the future.

A Novel Evaluation System of Psoriasis Curative Effect Based on Bayesian Maximum Entropy Weight Self-Learning and Extended Set Pair Analysis

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a complex skin disease and difficult to evaluate, and this study aimed to provide an objective and systematic approach for evaluating the efficacy of psoriasis.

METHODS

We sought to construct a Bayesian network from sixteen indicators in four aspects of psoriasis (skin lesion conditions, laboratory indexes, quality of life, and accompanying symptoms) and obtained weights of each index by combining the analytic hierarchy process with maximum entropy self-learning. Furthermore, we adopted stability analysis to calculate the minimum sample size of the system. The extended set pair analysis was utilized to evaluate the efficacy based on improved weights, which overcomes the limitation of set pair analysis (unable to evaluate the efficacy with uncertain grades and thresholds).

RESULTS

A total of 100 psoriasis vulgaris patients were included to evaluate the curative effect by the system. We obtained the weights of each index and the Euclidean distance for efficacy evaluation of 100 patients. The sensitivity analysis proved that the results had no significant change with the variation of single patient's indexes, which indicated that our results were stable to assess the effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

We provided an available method of comprehensive effective evaluation of various indicators of psoriasis and based on both subjective and objective weights.

Biologics recommendations for patients with psoriasis: a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for psoriasis

PURPOSE

This review article serves to assess the consistency of recommendations from guidelines on biologic agents for psoriasis, based on the quality evaluation of psoriasis Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search to identify CPGs that provide recommendations on diagnosis and treatment for psoriasis. Four reviewers performed a quality assessment of the included CPGs with the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument.

RESULTS

A total of 51 sets of CPGs from 22 medical societies or separate working groups fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The overall quality of the eligible sets of guidelines was moderate to high, with an overall average score of 55%The highest domain scores were Score and Purpose (70%) and Clarity of Presentation (68%). A total of 95 biologic agent recommendations were extracted from the 18 recommended CPGs.Three biologic agents (Etanercept, Adalimumab, Ustekinumab) were recommended for pediatric patients. Three biologic agents (Adalimumab, Ustekinumab, Secukinumab) were recommended as first-line biologic agents for adults with psoriasis.

CONCLUSION

The overall methodological quality of CPGs for psoriasis is medium to high. More attention should be paid to applicability in guideline development. The recommendations and the basis for them among various sets guidelines were almost consistent.

The risk of malignancy in patients with secukinumab-treated psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: analysis of clinical trial and postmarketing surveillance data with up to five years of follow-up

BACKGROUND

Data on the use of biologic therapy and malignancy risk are inconsistent due to limited long-term robust studies.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the malignancy risk in patients with secukinumab-treated psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

This integrated safety analysis from both the secukinumab clinical trial programme and postmarketing safety surveillance data included any patient receiving at least one approved dose of secukinumab with a maximum of 5 years of follow-up. Safety analyses evaluated the rate of malignancy using exposure-adjusted incidence rates [EAIR; incidence rates per 100 patient treatment-years (PTY)]. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were reported using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database as a reference population. Crude incidence of malignancy was also reported using postmarketing surveillance data.

RESULTS

Safety data from 49 clinical trials with secukinumab-treated patients were included: 10 685 patients with psoriasis, 2523 with PsA and 1311 with AS. Across indications over a 5-year period, the EAIR of malignancy was 0·85 per 100 PTY [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·74-0·98] in secukinumab-treated patients, corresponding to 204 patients per 23 908 PTY. Overall, the observed vs. expected number of malignancies from secukinumab clinical trial data were comparable, as indicated by an SIR of 0·99 (95% CI 0·82-1·19) across indications. The estimated crude cumulative incidence reporting rate per 100 PTY for malignancy was 0·27 in the postmarketing surveillance data across indications with a cumulative exposure of 285 811 PTY.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large safety analysis, the risk of malignancy was low for up to 5 years of secukinumab treatment. These data support the long-term use of secukinumab in these indications.

A Rasch model analysis of two interpretations of 'not relevant' responses on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)

PURPOSE

Eight of the ten items of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) have a 'not relevant' response (NRR) option. There are two possible ways to interpret NRRs: they may be considered 'not at all' or missing responses. We aim to compare the measurement performance of the DLQI in psoriasis patients when NRRs are scored as '0' (hereafter zero-scoring) and 'missing' (hereafter missing-scoring) using Rasch model analysis.

METHODS

Data of 425 patients with psoriasis from two earlier cross-sectional surveys were re-analysed. All patients completed the paper-based Hungarian version of the DLQI. A partial credit model was applied. The following model assumptions and measurement properties were tested: dimensionality, item fit, person reliability, order of response options and differential item functioning (DIF).

RESULTS

Principal component analysis of the residuals of the Rasch model confirmed the unidimensional structure of the DLQI. Person separation reliability indices were similar with zero-scoring (0.910) and missing-scoring (0.914) NRRs. With zero-scoring, items 6 (sport), 7 (working/studying) and 9 (sexual difficulties) suffered from item misfit and item-level disordering. With missing-scoring, no misfit was observed and only item 7 was illogically ordered. Six and three items showed DIF for gender and age, respectively, that were reduced to four and three by missing-scoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Missing-scoring NRRs resulted in an improved measurement performance of the scale. DLQI scores of patients with at least one vs. no NRRs cannot be directly compared. Our findings provide further empirical support to the DLQI-R scoring modification that treats NRRs as missing and replaces them with the average score of the relevant items.

Accurate surface ultraviolet radiation forecasting for clinical applications with deep neural network

Exposure to appropriate doses of UV radiation provides enormously health and medical treatment benefits including psoriasis. Typical hospital-based phototherapy cabinets contain a bunch of artificial lamps, either broad-band (main emission spectrum 280-360 nm, maximum 320 nm), or narrow-band UV B irradiation (main emission spectrum 310-315 nm, maximum 311 nm). For patients who cannot access phototherapy centers, sunbathing, or heliotherapy, can be a safe and effective treatment alternative. However, as sunlight contains the full range of UV radiation (290-400 nm), careful sunbathing supervised by photodermatologist based on accurate UV radiation forecast is vital to minimize potential adverse effects. Here, using 10-year UV radiation data collected at Nakhon Pathom, Thailand, we developed a deep learning model for UV radiation prediction which achieves around 10% error for 24-h forecast and 13-16% error for 7-day up to 4-week forecast. Our approach can be extended to UV data from different geographical regions as well as various biological action spectra. This will become one of the key tools for developing national heliotherapy protocol in Thailand. Our model has been made available at https://github.com/cmb-chula/SurfUVNet .

Pattern of use of biologics in psoriasis among Indian dermatologists - A cross sectional survey

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Biologics are a relatively new class of highly effective drugs in the management of psoriasis. They act on specific immune processes, achieve rapid and sustained clearance and do not cause target organ damage unlike conventional systemic therapy. It appears that their use in our country is not as widespread as in developed nations despite these benefits ; their prohibitive cost may be a major factor for the limited usage. This survey aimed to find out the extent of use and factors hindering usage of biologics for the management of psoriasis by Indian dermatologists.

METHODS

It was a cross-sectional questionnaire based study. The questionnaire was designed after a focussed group discussion, followed by validation. The survey was sent in the form of a link to Indian dermatologists. The responses were recorded in excel-sheet and the data was analyzed by SPSS ver 25.

RESULTS

Of the 310 participants who took part, 287 completed the survey. Two hundred (70%) were users of biologics, while 87 (30%) had never used them. Cost was the major factor which prevented biologic use. Majority of the respondents used biologics in less than 2 cases per month. Secukinumab was the most common biologic used followed by etanercept. The factors which determined choice of biologics were convenience, cost, previous experience, co-morbid conditions and recommendations by an expert.

LIMITATIONS

A small sample size was the limitation of the study. Dermatologists who do not use biologics may be under-represented in the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Biologics are not used optimally by Indian dermatologists for management of psoriasis. The cost, fear of adverse effects, lack of awareness and inadequate felt need are major factors which prevent their regular use.

PASI 100 response rates in moderate to severe psoriasis: a systematic literature review and analysis of clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

Response to treatments in psoriasis can be assessed using the PASI response 50, 75, 90 or 100. Achieving a PASI 100 response would mean a complete resolution of the patient's basal lesions. Therefore, PASI 100 score has been increasingly used in the context of research, but its role in daily practice is currently controversial.

OBJECTIVE

(1) To analyze PASI 100 response rates to pharmacological treatments; (2) To examine clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommendations/comments on PASI 100.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR). Selection criteria concerned patients with psoriasis, reporting PASI 100.

RESULTS

Overall, 65 studies were included. Patients on methotrexate achieved at 16 weeks a PASI 100 of 7.3%. For TNF inhibitors rates were: 3.7-11.1% at 12 weeks, 13.7-20% at 16 weeks, 10.7-24% at 24 weeks and 21.8-34.8% at 1 year. IL-17 inhibitors achieved 23.3-44% at 12 weeks, 44.3-57.2% at 16 weeks, 39.7-67.5% at 24 weeks and 41.4-67.5% at 1 year. And the reported by IL-12/23 inhibitors were 12%/23.8% at 12 weeks, 32.7%/50% at 16 weeks, 44% at 24 weeks and 41.8%/56.3% at 1 year. PASI 100 response is scarcely commented in the CPGs.

CONCLUSIONS

PASI 100 response rate is an endpoint fundamentally restricted to research.

IL-17 Inhibitors and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Postmarketing Study in Vigibase

Several gastrointestinal symptoms and chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) have been reported after therapy with IL-17 inhibitors. To date, however, no study has shown a clear association between these drugs and IBD onset. We searched on Vigibase, the worldwide pharmacovigilance database, to investigate reporting prevalence, characteristics, and prognosis of all gastroenterological adverse events in patients treated with IL-17 inhibitors. In total, 1,129 gastrointestinal Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) were identified, including 850 IBD (42.5% Crohn's disease, 31.9% ulcerative colitis, and 25.6% undifferentiated IBD) and 279 colitis (mainly undifferentiated colitis (79.2%), and microscopic colitis (10.4%)). ICSRs were associated with secukinumab (SEC, 83.6%) or ixekizumab (IXE, 16.3%), whereas only one colitis occurred with brodalumab (0.1%). Most IBD and colitis cases were detected within 6 months from therapy start in both the SEC (68.8% and 73.5%) and IXE groups (100% and 66.7%). Patients' outcomes were reported in 428 ICSRs (37.9%). Complete or ongoing recovery from symptoms was detected in about two-thirds of patients experiencing IBD (59.5%) or colitis (64.2%), whereas in the other cases, there was no recovery (33.9% and 29.5%) or there were sequelae (5.4% and 4.2%). Fatal events occurred in four patients (1.2%) in the IBD group (3 after SEC and on1e with IXE) and two SEC-treated subjects in the colitis group (2.1%). Treatment with IL-17 inhibitors is associated with a relevant number of exacerbations and new onset of IBD and colitis. Careful evaluation of gastrointestinal symptoms and the monitoring of intestinal inflammatory biomarkers should be recommended before prescribing these drugs.

Profile of Psoriasis Vulgaris Patients Treated with Methotrexate at Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya, 2017–2018

Background: Psoriasis Vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects patients’ quality of life. Methotrexate is the first-line and most effective systemic therapy in psoriasis vulgaris management. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical improvement after methotrexate therapy and any adverse effects of methotrexate therapy in psoriasis vulgaris management. Methods: The data for this descriptive, retrospective study were retrieved from the medical records of 22 psoriasis vulgaris patients who were treated with methotrexate therapy between January 2017 and June 2018 in the Child Kemuning Ward (IRNA), Dr. Soetomo General Hospital in Surabaya, East Java. Results: Data for a total of 22 subjects were collected for this study. The majority of the subjects were in the age group 25–59, and the average age was 40.50±17.20. Good clinical improvement (decrease in the body surface area of the lesion) was found in all patients. The adverse effects of methotrexate were evaluated based on the elevation of liver and renal function test levels. An elevation of aspartate aminotransferase levels was found in 11 patients, and an elevation in alanine aminotransferase levels was found in 13 patients. Elevated blood urea nitrogen levels were found in eight patients, and elevated serum creatinine levels were found in four patients. Conclusion: Methotrexate is an effective treatment for severe psoriasis vulgaris management when administered with careful selection and regular monitoring of patients. Application of methotrexate therapy in accordance with the guidelines remains suitable for psoriasis vulgaris management with vigilance regarding methotrexate’s adverse effects.