Apremilast for moderate hidradenitis suppurativa: no significant change in lesional skin inflammatory biomarkers

Orismilast for the treatment of mild to severe hidradenitis suppurativa: Week 16 data from OSIRIS, a Phase 2a, open-label, single-centre, single-arm, dose-finding clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a disease with an unmet need for treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To examine tolerability, safety and efficacy of oral phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitior orismilast 10-40 mg twice daily (BID) in HS.

METHODS

A Phase 2a, single-arm, single-centre, open-label, 16-week trial in HS patients. Adjustments in maximal dose and titration were allowed, to improve tolerability, dividing the study population in two groups who completed and discontinued 16 weeks of treatment. Descriptive statistics were applied to efficacy data from patients who completed treatment and patients who discontinued treatment prematurely. A last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) approach was used for patients who discontinued treatment. The primary endpoint was percent change in the total number of abscesses and nodules (AN-count) at Week 16, with the HS Clinical Response with a 50% reduction in the AN-count (HiSCR50) as key secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

Of the 20 patients included, 9 completed 16 weeks of treatment and 11 discontinued treatment prematurely. The mean AN-count was reduced with 33.1% in patients who completed treatment and with 12.0% in patients who discontinued. HiSCR50 was achieved by 67.0% and 27.0% of patients who completed and discontinued treatment, respectively. Most adverse events were mild to moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral orismilast demonstrated a dose-dependent tolerability, with mild to moderate adverse effects. Further, the results of this exploratory trial indicate that orismilast may lead to clinical improvements in HS. However, larger trials with tolerable dose ranges are warranted. The Trial is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (UNI50007201) and EudraCT.ema.europa.eu (2021-000049-42).

Orismilast in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: Efficacy and safety from a 16-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, and phase 2b trial (IASOS)

BACKGROUND

Orismilast is a novel oral phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) B/D inhibitor being investigated as a potential treatment for moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate efficacy and safety of orismilast modified-release formulation in moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized (1:1:1:1 to 20, 30, 40 mg orismilast or placebo, twice daily), double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2b, 16-week, dose-ranging study evaluated orismilast in adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (NCT05190419). Efficacy end points were analyzed using multiple imputation.

RESULTS

Of 202 randomized patients, baseline characteristics were balanced across arms, except greater severe disease proportions for orismilast vs placebo. Orismilast showed significant improvements in the primary end point, percentage change in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), from baseline to week 16 (orismilast -52.6% to -63.7% and placebo, -17.3%; all P <.001). Greater proportions receiving orismilast achieved PASI75 (39.5%-49.0%; P <.05) and PASI90 (22.0%-28.3%; P <.05 for 20 and 40 mg) vs placebo (PASI75, 16.5% and PASI90, 8.3%) at week 16. Safety findings were as expected with PDE4 inhibition; dose-dependent tolerability effects observed.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size, disease severity imbalance between groups, limited duration and diversity in study population.

CONCLUSION

Orismilast demonstrated greater efficacy vs placebo and a safety profile in line with PDE4 inhibition.

HS 3D-SeboSkin Model Enables the Preclinical Exploration of Therapeutic Candidates for Hidradenitis Suppurativa/Acne Inversa

Despite the rapid development in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) research, the immediate introduction of potent therapeutic compounds in clinical trials and the lack of definitive outcome measures have led to the discontinuation of potential therapeutic compound studies. HS is a solely human disease, and therefore, the search for preclinical human models has been given priority. The 3D-SeboSkin model, a co-culture of human skin explants with human SZ95 sebocytes as a feeder layer, has been shown to prevent the rapid degeneration of human skin in culture and has been validated for HS preclinical studies. In this work, the HS 3D-SeboSkin model has been employed to characterize cellular and molecular effects of the EMA- and FDA-approved biologic adalimumab. Adalimumab, a tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor, was shown to target inflammatory cells present in HS lesions, inducing a prominent anti-inflammatory response and contributing to tissue regeneration through a wound healing mechanism. Adalimumab inhibited the lesional tissue expression of TNF-α, IL-3, IL-15, and MCP-3 and downregulated the secretion of IL-1α, IL-5, RANTES, MCP-2, TNF-α, TNF-β, TGF-β, and IFN-γ. In contrast, IL-6 was stimulated. The compound failed to modify abnormal epithelial cell differentiation present in the HS lesions. Patients with Hurley stage II lesions exhibited stronger expression of autophagy proteins in perilesional than in lesional skin. Adalimumab modified the levels of the pro-apoptotic proteins LC3A, LC3B, and p62 in an individual, patient-dependent manner. Finally, adalimumab did not modify the NFκB signal proteins in SZ95 sebocytes and NHK-19 keratinocytes, used to study this specific pathway. The administration of the validated HS 3D-SeboSkin model in ex vivo studies prior to clinical trials could elucidate the individual pathogenetic targets of therapeutic candidates and, therefore, increase the success rates of clinical studies, minimizing HS drug development costs.

Biologics and Small Molecule Inhibitors for Treating Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The treatment guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) vary among different countries, and several biologics and small molecule inhibitors have been tested for treating moderate-to-severe HS over the past few years. However, treatment guidelines for HS vary among different countries.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to exam the efficacy and serious adverse events (SAEs) of biologics and small-molecule inhibitors in treating moderate-to-severe HS. Binary outcomes were presented as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

We included 16 RCTs with a total of 2076 participants on nine biologics and three small-molecule inhibitors for treating moderate-to-severe HS, including adalimumab, anakinra, apremilast, avacopan, bimekizumab, CJM112, etanercept, guselkumab, IFX-1, INCB054707, infliximab, and MABp1. The meta-analysis revealed only adalimumab (RR 1.77, 95% CI, 1.44-2.17) and bimekizumab (RR 2.25, 95% CI, 1.03-4.92) achieved significant improvement on hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR), and adalimumab was superior to placebo in achieving dermatology life quality index (DLQI) 0/1 (RR 3.97; 95% CI, 1.70-9.28). No increase in SAEs was found for all included active treatments when compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab and bimekizumab are the only two biologics effective in achieving HiSCR with acceptable safety profile, whereas adalimumab is the only biologic effective in achieving DLQI 0/1.

IL-17RA blockade by brodalumab decreases inflammatory pathways in hidradenitis suppurativa skin and serum

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory skin disease with dysregulation of the IL-17 axis. Recently we reported clinical benefit of brodalumab, a human anti-IL-17 receptor A (IL-17RA) monoclonal antibody, in moderate-to-severe HS.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the molecular response to brodalumab in HS skin and serum, and to identify biomarkers of treatment response.

METHODS

Ten participants that received 210 mg/1.5mL brodalumab subcutaneously at week 0, 1, 2, 4 and every 2 weeks after were included in this molecular profiling study (NCT03960268). RNA-sequencing and immunohistochemistry of nonlesional, perilesional and lesional HS skin biopsies, and Olink high throughput proteomics of serum at baseline, week 4 and week 12 were assessed.

RESULTS

At week 12, brodalumab led to a decrease of overall inflammation, and improvement of psoriasis-, keratinocyte- and neutrophil-related pathways. Despite perilesional and lesional skin having no differentially expressed genes at baseline, treatment response was best assessed in perilesional skin. In serum, brodalumab treatment decreased pathways involved in neutrophil inflammation. Patients with higher baseline expression of neutrophil-associated Lipocalin-2 (LCN2) in the skin and IL-17A in the serum demonstrated greater decreases of HS-related inflammatory cytokines as measured in skin biopsies at week 12.

CONCLUSIONS

IL-17RA inhibition by brodalumab impacts several pathogenic inflammatory axes in HS. Perilesional skin provides a valid and robust assessment of treatment response. Expression of LCN2 in skin and IL-17A in serum may be used as biomarkers to stratify patients that may have a superior molecular response to brodalumab =.

The inflammatory proteome of hidradenitis suppurativa skin is more expansive than that of psoriasis vulgaris

BACKGROUND

Although hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) shares some transcriptomic and cellular infiltrate features with psoriasis, their skin proteome remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To define and compare inflammatory protein biomarkers of HS and psoriasis skin.

METHODS

We assessed 92 inflammatory biomarkers in HS (n = 13), psoriasis (n = 11), and control skin (n = 11) using Olink high-throughput proteomics. We also correlated HS skin and blood biomarkers using proteomics and RNA sequencing.

RESULTS

We identified 57 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in lesional psoriasis and 64 DEPs in lesional HS skin, compared to healthy controls. Both HS and psoriasis lesional skin demonstrated a significant upregulation of T helper 1 and T helper 17 proteins. Healthy-appearing perilesional HS skin had 63 DEPs compared to healthy controls. Nonlesional HS and psoriasis skin had 24 and 7 DEPs, respectively, compared to healthy controls. Tumor necrosis factor and 8 other proteins were significantly correlated with clinical severity in perilesional HS skin (2 cm from a nodule).

LIMITATIONS

Inclusion of only moderate-to-severe patients and the cohort size.

CONCLUSION

HS has a greater inflammatory profile and is more diffusely distributed compared with psoriasis. Proteins correlated with disease severity are potential disease mediators. Perilesional skin is comparably inflamed to lesional skin, suggesting the need to treat beyond skin nodules.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Comorbid Disorder Biomarkers, Druggable Genes, New Drugs and Drug Repurposing-A Molecular Meta-Analysis

Chronic inflammation and dysregulated epithelial differentiation, especially of hair follicle keratinocytes, have been suggested as the major pathogenetic pathways of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS). On the other hand, obesity and metabolic syndrome have additionally been considered as an important risk factor. With adalimumab, a drug has already been approved and numerous other compounds are in advanced-stage clinical studies. A systematic review was conducted to detect and corroborate HS pathogenetic mechanisms at the molecular level and identify HS molecular markers. The obtained data were used to confirm studied and off-label administered drugs and to identify additional compounds for drug repurposing. A robust, strongly associated group of HS biomarkers was detected. The triad of HS pathogenesis, namely upregulated inflammation, altered epithelial differentiation and dysregulated metabolism/hormone signaling was confirmed, the molecular association of HS with certain comorbid disorders, such as inflammatory bowel disease, arthritis, type I diabetes mellitus and lipids/atherosclerosis/adipogenesis was verified and common biomarkers were identified. The molecular suitability of compounds in clinical studies was confirmed and 31 potential HS repurposing drugs, among them 10 drugs already launched for other disorders, were detected. This systematic review provides evidence for the importance of molecular studies to advance the knowledge regarding pathogenesis, future treatment and biomarker-supported clinical course follow-up in HS.

New perspectives on the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by the presence of painful nodules, abscesses, chronically draining fistulas, and scarring in apocrine gland-bearing areas of the body. The exact pathogenesis of HS is not yet well understood, but there is a consensus in considering HS a multifactorial disease with a genetic predisposition, an inflammatory dysregulation, and an influence of environmental modifying factors. Therapeutic approach of HS is challenging due to the wide clinical manifestations of the disease and the complex pathogenesis. This review describes evidence for effectiveness of current and emerging HS therapies. Topical therapy, systemic treatments, biological agents, surgery, and light therapy have been used for HS with variable results. Adalimumab is the only US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved biologic agent for moderate-to-severe HS, but new therapeutic options are being studied, targeting different specific cytokines involved in HS pathogenesis. Comparing treatment outcomes between therapies is difficult due to the lack of randomized controlled trials. Treatment strategy should be selected in concordance to disease severity and requires combination of treatments in most cases.

Apremilast for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa associated with psoriatic arthritis in multimorbid patients: Case report and review of literature

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a complex, chronic, difficult to treat condition belonging to the spectrum of cutaneous immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Systemic treatment options for moderate-severe disease are limited to TNF-alpha antagonists and other biologic agents, with limited clinical evidence.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We report two adult patients with severe hidradenitis suppurativa presenting concomitant psoriatic arthritis and multiple medical comorbidities. Both were ineligible or resistant to adalimumab, the only biologic drug approved for the treatment of hidradenitis.

DIAGNOSIS

Both patients were diagnosed with severe Hurley III-stage disease and psoriatic arthritis, showing resistance to first-line systemic treatments and a complex comorbidity profile.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients underwent treatment with apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, approved for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis.

OUTCOMES

After 16 weeks of treatment, a clinically relevant improvement of inflammatory lesions, skin- and arthritis-related pain, and patient-reported outcomes was achieved in both patients. Apremilast was well tolerated and continued up to 48 weeks of treatment.

CONCLUSION

We report the "real-life" use of apremilast in the treatment of multimorbid patients with hidradenitis suppurativa and review its potential role in the management of this severe condition.