Analysis of clinical characteristics, prognosis and antibody pathogenicity of pemphigus patients positive for anti-desmoglein IgG autoantibodies in remission: a retrospective cohort study

Pemphigus and pemphigoids: Clinical presentation, diagnosis and therapy

Pemphigus and pemphigoid are two potentially life-threatening groups of autoimmune diseases, characterized by autoantibodies targeting structural components of desmosomes or hemidesmosomes, respectively. Affected patients typically show itchy/painful plaques or blistering skin lesions and/or impairing mucosal blistering and erosions, which may strongly impact their quality of life. Since the milestone work of Walter Lever in 1953, who differentiated these two groups of diseases by histopathological analysis of the level of antibody-mediated skin cleavage, enormous progresses occurred. Achievements made in laboratory diagnostics now allow to identify antigen specific structural proteins of the skin that are targeted by pathogenic autoantibodies. These progresses were accompanied by an increased understanding of the pathogenesis of these diseases thanks to the establishment of animal models reproducing disease and on studies on skin and blood of affected individuals, which have been leading to novel and disease-specific treatments. Yet, given their phenotypical overlap with more common dermatological diseases, correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment are often delayed, in some cases leading to irreversible sequelae, including organ dysfunction (i.e., loss of vision in mucous membrane pemphigoid). Here, we provide a concise overview of the clinical appearance, diagnosis and therapeutic management of pemphigus and pemphigoid diseases.

Pemphigus- und Pemphigoid-Erkrankungen: Klinik, Diagnostik und Therapie: Pemphigus and pemphigoids: Clinical presentation, diagnosis and therapy

Pemphigus und Pemphigoid sind seltene Autoimmunkrankheiten der Haut mit potenziell lebensbedrohlichem Verlauf. Autoantikörper gegen epidermale und junktionale Strukturproteine (Desmosomen sowie Hemidesmosomen) führen bei Betroffenen typischerweise zu juckenden, schmerzhaften Plaques oder Blasen an der Haut und/oder Blasenbildung und Erosionen der Schleimhäute mit möglicher Einschränkung der Lebensqualität. Seit der bahnbrechenden Arbeit von Walter Lever im Jahr 1953, dem es gelang, mittels histopathologischer Untersuchung diese beiden Krankheitsgruppen anhand des Musters der Antikörper‐vermittelten Blasenbildung zu differenzieren, wurden enorme Fortschritte im Verständnis der Erkrankungen erzielt. Die Errungenschaften in der Labordiagnostik ermöglichten die Identifikation von Zielstrukturen zur präzisen Unterscheidung verschiedener Varianten der bullösen Autoimmunerkrankungen. Diese Fortschritte gingen dank der Entwicklung von Tiermodellen mit einem besseren Verständnis der Pathogenese einher. Außerdem haben Studien an Haut und Blut betroffener Patienten zu neuen und krankheitsspezifischen Behandlungen geführt. Aufgrund ihrer Seltenheit und der klinischen Ähnlichkeit mit anderen dermatologischen Erkrankungen verzögern sich die korrekte Diagnosestellung und die Einleitung einer entsprechenden Therapie häufig, was in einigen Fällen zu irreversiblen Folgeerscheinungen, einschließlich Funktionsstörungen von Organen (zum Beispiel Verlust des Sehvermögens beim Schleimhautpemphigoid) führt. Wir geben hier einen Überblick über das klinische Erscheinungsbild, den Diagnosealgorithmus und das therapeutische Management von Pemphigus‐ und Pemphigoid‐Erkrankungen.

B-cell targeted therapy of pemphigus

Pemphigus is an autoimmune disease that causes blistering and erosion of the skin and mucous membranes because of autoantibodies against desmoglein, which plays an important role in adhesion between epidermal keratinocytes. Treatment of pemphigus has long been centered on corticosteroids, and the guidelines for management of pemphigus have recommended high-dose systemic corticosteroids as the first-line treatment. While guideline-based treatment has been shown to be beneficial in patients with pemphigus, it has also become clear that this treatment is accompanied by significant burden and risk. The challenge for future pemphigus treatment is to maximize efficacy while minimizing risk during the course of the disease. In this regard, treatment targeting B cells is expected to become increasingly important as autoreactive B cells in pemphigus patients are thought to play a major role in the production of autoantibodies, which form the basis of the pathogenesis. The recent expansion of insurance coverage to rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against CD20, for refractory pemphigus in the USA, Europe, and Japan has opened up a new era of pemphigus treatment by enabling treatment strategies with drugs targeting B cells in patients. Here, we discuss the current status and future prospects of pemphigus treatment, focusing on rituximab and Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, which are expected to become essential drugs for pemphigus treatment in the future.

Clinical course and outcomes of pemphigus vulgaris and foliaceus: A retrospective study using a nationwide database in Japan

Pemphigus is a life-threatening autoimmune blistering disease. Patient characteristics, treatment courses, and outcomes remain unclear owing to its rarity. To describe the background, treatment, and outcomes of pemphigus, we identified 2598 patients with pemphigus vulgaris and 1186 patients with pemphigus foliaceus from a nationwide inpatient database in Japan. Patients with pemphigus vulgaris were younger (62 vs 72 years, P < 0.001), had fewer comorbidities, and were more likely to be admitted to high-volume hospitals (38% vs 30%, P < 0.001) than those with pemphigus foliaceus. Patients with pemphigus vulgaris had undergone more aggressive treatment, including steroid pulse therapy, intravenous immunoglobulin, or plasmapheresis, compared with those with pemphigus foliaceus (48% vs 42%, P = 0.001); specifically, in patients aged <70 years, the pemphigus vulgaris group was more likely to undergo aggressive treatment than the pemphigus foliaceus group (52% vs 45%), whereas there was no significant difference in patients aged ≥70 years (40% vs 40%). Immunosuppressive agents (30% vs 26%, P = 0.015) and analgesics, including opioids (45% vs 36%, P < 0.001), were used more frequently, whereas topical corticosteroids were used less frequently (32% vs 48%, P < 0.001) in patients with pemphigus vulgaris compared with those with pemphigus foliaceus. In-hospital mortality was lower in patients with pemphigus vulgaris than in those with pemphigus foliaceus (2.2% vs 4.0%, P = 0.002); in the comparison stratified by age, the mortality was equivalent among the two groups (0.6% in patients aged <70 years and 6.1% in those aged ≥70 years). Overall, patients with pemphigus vulgaris had a 10-day longer hospitalization period and higher hospitalization costs than those with pemphigus foliaceus. Our findings provide useful information for understanding the current trends in the management of pemphigus in Japan.

The Diversity of Serum Anti-DSG3 IgG Subclasses Has a Major Impact on Pemphigus Activity and Is Predictive of Relapses After Treatment With Rituximab

Introduction

We studied the distribution and in vitro pathogenicity of anti-DSG3 IgG subclasses during the course of pemphigus vulgaris (PV).

Methods

We longitudinally studied the distribution of anti-DSG3 IgG subclasses (before versus after treatment) in sera from PV patients, using an addressable-laser bead immunoassay (ALBIA). The in vitro pathogenicity of corresponding sera was tested using keratinocyte dissociation and immunofluorescence assays.

Results

Sixty-five sera were assessed at baseline (33 from patients treated with rituximab and 32 with corticosteroids). Sixty-three percent of these baseline sera contained 2 or more anti-DSG3 IgG subclasses versus 35.7% of sera from patients in complete remission (CR) and 75.0% of sera from patients with persistent disease activity after treatment. IgG4 was the most frequently detected anti-DSG3 IgG subclass, both in patients with disease activity and in those in CR. The presence of three or more anti-DSG3 IgG subclasses was predictive of relapse, in particular when it included IgG3, with a positive predictive value of 62.5% and a negative predictive value of 92%. While anti-DSG3 IgG4 Abs from sera collected before treatment were most often pathogenic, anti-DSG3 IgG4 from sera collected after treatment were pathogenic only after adjusting their titer to the one measured before treatment. The IgG3 fraction containing anti-DSG3 Abs also had an in vitro pathogenic effect. The disappearance of the pathogenic effect of some sera after removal of anti-DSG3 IgG3 suggested an additional effect of this IgG subclass.

Conclusion

The serum levels and number of anti-DSG3 IgG subclasses drive the pathogenic effect of pemphigus sera and may predict the occurrence of relapses.