Exposure to biologic therapy before and during pregnancy in patients with psoriasis: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Ustekinumab in the Treatment of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis in a Pregnant Patient

Although the use of biologics has led to great improvement in psoriasis patients, the treatment of psoriasis during pregnancy still faces many challenges. We herein report on a 29-year-old pregnant woman treated with ustekinumab for generalized pustular psoriasis. Upon becoming pregnant, the woman underwent continued treatment with ustekinumab in the first trimester. We also considered the need for neonatal vaccination. The patient discontinued ustekinumab therapy in the second trimester, and during the period of drug discontinuation we noted a slight rash recurrence. The patient was treated with ultraviolet B phototherapy and topical corticosteroids, and the rash was localized to the abdomen. However, in the 27th week of pregnancy, the patient was infected with COVID-19, which made the condition worse. The rash erupted rapidly and spread throughout her body, and she experienced a high fever with her blood count showing augmented numbers of white blood cells. The patients self-administered 0.3 g of acetaminophen three times per day, and after four days her core body temperature was 38.0°C; the rash, however, did not diminish. We diagnosed an outbreak of generalized pustular psoriasis and treated the patient with ustekinumab. The rash resolved quickly, and a healthy newborn was delivered by caesarean section at 39 weeks.

Reproductive Safety Issues of Novel Small Molecules for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review

Maintenance of remission during pregnancy is vital for women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The antenatal safety of novel small molecules for IBD is yet to be ascertained. We aimed to describe the current evidence on reproductive data regarding small-molecule drugs. We performed a systematic review searching Embase Classic + Embase and Ovid MEDLINE for reproductive outcomes for tofacitinib, filgotinib, upadacitininb, and ozanimod. Additionally, we asked the manufacturers for available data on file regarding reproduction. We analysed data from 10 sources; six studies and four manufacturer reports were identified from our search. Significant malformation risks were reported for tofacitinib, filgotinib, upadacitininb, and ozanimod in animal studies. In 126 tofacitinib-exposed pregnancies, there were 55 live births with 2 congenital malformations and 1 serious infant infection, 14 terminations, 15 miscarriages, and 42 outcomes unknown. In 50 filgotinib-exposed pregnancies, there were 20 healthy babies, 1 congenital malformation, 9 terminations, 10 miscarriages, and 10 outcomes unknown. In 78 upadacitinib-exposed pregnancies, there were 30 healthy babies, 15 terminations, 15 miscarriages, and 18 outcomes unknown. In 60 ozanimod-exposed pregnancies, there were 31 live births with 1 congenital malformation, 1 case of intra-uterine growth restriction, 1 case of neonatal icterus, 13 terminations, 9 miscarriages, and 8 unknown outcomes. Animal data suggest significant risks of malformations for tofacitinib, filgotinib, upadacitininb, and ozanimod. Human data from clinical trials and real-world observations do not show concerning data so far, but these are very limited. Currently, alternative treatments should be used for IBD during pregnancy.