Problematic placebos in physical therapy trials

Good Scientific Practice and Ethics in Sports and Exercise Science: A Brief and Comprehensive Hands-on Appraisal for Sports Research

Sports and exercise training research is constantly evolving to maintain, improve, or regain psychophysical, social, and emotional performance. Exercise training research requires a balance between the benefits and the potential risks. There is an inherent risk of scientific misconduct and adverse events in most sports; however, there is a need to minimize it. We aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical and ethical challenges in sports and exercise research. We also enlist solutions to improve method design in clinical trials and provide checklists to minimize the chances of scientific misconduct. At the outset, historical milestones of exercise science literature are summarized. It is followed by details about the currently available regulations that help to reduce the risk of violating good scientific practices. We also outline the unique characteristics of sports-related research with a narrative of the major differences between sports and drug-based trials. An emphasis is then placed on the importance of well-designed studies to improve the interpretability of results and generalizability of the findings. This review finally suggests that sports researchers should comply with the available guidelines to improve the planning and conduct of future research thereby reducing the risk of harm to research participants. The authors suggest creating an oath to prevent malpractice, thereby improving the knowledge standards in sports research. This will also aid in deriving more meaningful implications for future research based on high-quality, ethically sound evidence.

Feasibility of Using Detuned Laser as a Placebo In Manual Therapy Research: An Analysis of Participant Perceptions

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of using detuned laser as a placebo intervention in manual therapy research.

METHODS

We performed a secondary data analysis of a randomized controlled trial. In our analysis, 30 participants with chronic ankle instability (manual therapy group: n = 13, age = 33.1 ± 8.1 years, female participants = 50%; detuned laser group: n = 17, age = 31.9 ± 11.8 years, female participants = 72%) were asked to indicate which intervention (manual therapy [active] or detuned laser [placebo]), they thought they had received and to give a confidence rating on their response regarding the received intervention at the conclusion of the course of intervention. Independent t tests were used to compare the groups. Participants in both groups were asked the following open-ended question: "What did you think of the intervention?".

RESULTS

There were 52.9% participants in the detuned laser group and 53.8% participants in the manual therapy group who perceived that they had received the active intervention. The confidence ratings about their perceptions (6.7 ± 2.0, detuned laser group; 6.3 ± 2.4, manual therapy group) (P = .66) and the self-reported recovery ratings (1.9 ± 1.5 and 1.8 ± 1.2, respectively) (P = .77) were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants in this study confidently perceived that detuned laser was an active intervention. They positively rated their recovery following the course of the placebo intervention and perceived that detuned laser was effective in treating their condition. Therefore, it is feasible for detuned laser to be used as a placebo for manual therapy trials.

Does combined individualized orofacial manual therapy, pain neuroscience education, and brain training change orofacial pain, chronic face dysfunction, (facial) body perception and pain? An observational mixed methods case series study

BACKGROUND

Orofacial pain is a complex disabling condition. Multimodal physical therapy intervention may be helpful, yet studies of such approaches are not available and are the basis of this study.

OBJECTIVE

To identify whether combined orofacial manual therapy, pain neuroscience education, graded motor imagery, and face emotional expression training has an impact on orofacial pain and associated features.

DESIGN

Mixed-methods case series report.

METHODS

Eight subjects (five females) with predominant chronic unilateral face pain (mean duration 7.3 years) were given six individualized treatment sessions and a home program. The primary outcome was orofacial pain, while secondary outcomes were depression, quality of life, alexithymia, 2-point discrimination (TPD), laterality and emotional recognition, as well as qualitative analysis were evaluated post intervention.

RESULTS

Following the intervention orofacial pain intensity significantly reduced (p = 0.03) from 3.0 (0.53) to 2.2 (1.75) on the Graded Chronic Pain Status questionnaire. As well, secondary outcome measures depression, alexithymia, TPD, and quality of life also significantly improved. Changes were not significant in aspects of facial perception. Qualitative analysis of perception of therapy is discussed.

CONCLUSION

Multimodal therapy had a positive outcome in terms of improvement in unilateral persistent facial pain, depression score, facial body perception and quality of life, and pain in people with chronic unilateral facial pain. Based on the qualitative analysis of their perception of the therapy, multimodal therapy had beneficial effects through increased motivation and joy to exercise.

Validation of a sham novel neural mobilization technique in patients with non-specific low back pain: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

There is no validated sham neural mobilization (NM) intervention for lower quadrant conditions. A suitable sham NM comparator will allow to blind patients with low back pain (LBP) and reduce bias by limiting the confounding effects of expectations.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim was to develop a sham NM technique in patients with non-specific LBP and assess its validity in supplying a suitable blinding. Secondly, we compared the short-term effects of NM and the sham comparator on pain and the straight leg raise.

DESIGN

A randomized placebo-controlled trial in which participants and assessors were blinded.

METHOD

Fifty one patients (20 men,31 women), aged 22-65 years (43 ± 12y) were allocated randomly to a NM group (n = 26) or a sham NM group (n = 25). The primary outcome of believability of the sham technique was measured one week after the intervention. Secondary outcomes of pain intensity and the straight leg raise range-of-motion were assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention and one week after.

RESULTS

The believability of the sham technique in terms of the frequencies of perceived group assignment showed no differences between groups. Eighteen participants believed they had received the experimental NM technique in the experimental group (69.2%) and 14 in the placebo NM group (56%). Pain and the straight leg raise changes did not show differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel sham NM demonstrated to be a believable intervention, capable of supplying a suitable blinding. Both groups showed similar short term perceived effects on pain and the straight leg raise.

Neurorehabilitation Improves the Motor Features in Prodromal SCA2: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The search for early interventions is a novel approach in spinocerebellar ataxias, but there are few studies supporting this notion. This article aimed to assess the efficacy of neurorehabilitation treatment in prodromal spinocerebellar ataxia type 2.

METHODS

Thirty spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 preclinical carriers were enrolled in a randomized, controlled trial using neurorehabilitation. The intervention in the treated group was 4 hours per day, 5 days per week for 12 weeks, emphasizing static balance, gait, and limb coordination. The control group did not receive rehabilitation. The primary outcome measure was the time for 5-m tandem gait over the floor. Secondary outcomes included other timed tests with increased motor complexity, as well as the scores of the SARA and the Inventory of Non-ataxia Symptoms.

RESULTS

The times for 5-m tandem gait over the floor and the mattress were significantly reduced only in the rehabilitated group. Moreover, the times upholding the tandem stance over a mattress and the seesaw were notably increased only in this group. Likewise, the finger-nose and the heel-shin tests were improved in the rehabilitated group alone. The SARA score and the count of nonataxia symptoms were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

This rehabilitation program improves the subtle gait, postural and coordinative deficits in prodromal spinocerebellar ataxia type 2, which provided novel hints about the preservation of motor learning and neural plasticity mechanisms in early disease stages, leading chances for other interventional approaches in this and other spinocerebellar ataxias. © 2019 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Placebos and the Placebo Effect in Drug Trials

In this review, we explored different ways of controlling the placebo effects in clinical trials and described various factors that may increase/decrease the placebo effect in randomized placebo-controlled trials. These factors can be subdivided into four groups, and while not all factors are effective in every study and under all clinical conditions, they show on the whole that - even under the ideal condition of drug therapy, where blinded placebo provision is much easier and warranted than in, e.g., psychotherapy - many factors need to be controlled to ascertain that the goal of the clinical trials, fair assessment of superiority of the drug over placebo in placebo-controlled trials and fair assessment of non-inferiority of the drug compared to another drug in comparator trials, is reached. Ignorance towards the placebo effect, which was common in the past, is no longer acceptable; instead, it should be the goal of all therapeutic trials to minimize the placebo effect in clinical trials, while utilizing and maximizing it in clinical routine.

Clinical relevance of contextual factors as triggers of placebo and nocebo effects in musculoskeletal pain

Placebo and nocebo effects are embodied psycho-neurobiological responses capable of modulating pain and producing changes at different neurobiological, body at perceptual and cognitive levels. These modifications are triggered by different contextual factors (CFs) presented in the therapeutic encounter between patient and healthcare providers, such as healing rituals and signs. The CFs directly impact on the quality of the therapeutic outcome: a positive context, that is a context characterized by the presence of positive CFs, can reduce pain by producing placebo effects, while a negative context, characterized by the presence of negative CFs, can aggravate pain by creating nocebo effects. Despite the increasing interest about this topic; the detailed study of CFs as triggers of placebo and nocebo effects is still lacked in the management of musculoskeletal pain.

Increasing evidence suggest a relevant role of CFs in musculoskeletal pain management. CFs are a complex sets of internal, external or relational elements encompassing: patient’s expectation, history, baseline characteristics; clinician’s behavior, belief, verbal suggestions and therapeutic touch; positive therapeutic encounter, patient-centered approach and social learning; overt therapy, posology of intervention, modality of treatment administration; marketing features of treatment and health care setting. Different explanatory models such as classical conditioning and expectancy can explain how CFs trigger placebo and nocebo effects. CFs act through specific neural networks and neurotransmitters that were described as mediators of placebo and nocebo effects.

Available findings suggest a relevant clinical role and impact of CFs. They should be integrated in the clinical reasoning to increase the number of treatment solutions, boosts their efficacy and improve the quality of the decision-making. From a clinical perspective, the mindful manipulation of CFs represents a useful opportunity to enrich a well-established therapy in therapeutic setting within the ethical border. From a translational perspective, there is a strong need of research studies on CFs close to routine and real-world clinical practice in order to underline the uncertainty of therapy action and help clinicians to implement knowledge in daily practice.

A Question of Control? Examining the Role of Control Conditions in Experimental Psychopathology using the Example of Cognitive Bias Modification Research

While control conditions are vitally important in research, selecting the optimal control condition can be challenging. Problems are likely to arise when the choice of control condition is not tightly guided by the specific question that a given study aims to address. Such problems have become increasingly apparent in experimental psychopathology research investigating the experimental modification of cognitive biases, particularly as the focus of this research has shifted from theoretical questions concerning mechanistic aspects of the association between cognitive bias and emotional vulnerability, to questions that instead concern the clinical efficacy of ‘cognitive bias modification’ (CBM) procedures. We discuss the kinds of control conditions that have typically been employed in CBM research, illustrating how difficulties can arise when changes in the types of research questions asked are not accompanied by changes in the control conditions employed. Crucially, claims made on the basis of comparing active and control conditions within CBM studies should be restricted to those conclusions allowed by the specific control condition employed. CBM studies aiming to establish clinical utility are likely to require quite different control conditions from CBM studies aiming to illuminate mechanisms. Further, conclusions concerning the clinical utility of CBM interventions cannot necessarily be drawn from studies in which the control condition has been chosen to answer questions concerning mechanisms. Appreciating the need to appropriately alter control conditions in the transition from basic mechanisms-focussed investigations to applied clinical research could greatly facilitate the translational process.

Pedometer Step Count Targets during Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Randomized Controlled Trial

RATIONALE

Increasing physical activity is a key therapeutic aim in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves exercise capacity, but there is conflicting evidence regarding its ability to improve physical activity levels.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether using pedometers as an adjunct to PR can enhance time spent in at least moderate-intensity physical activity (time expending ≥3 metabolic equivalents [METs]) by people with COPD.

METHODS

In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, participants were assigned 1:1 to receive a control intervention (PR comprising 8 wk, two supervised sessions per week) or the trial intervention (PR plus pedometer-directed step targets, reviewed weekly for 8 wk). In the randomization process, we used minimization to balance groups for age, sex, FEV₁ percent predicted, and baseline exercise capacity and physical activity levels. Outcome assessors and PR therapists were blinded to group allocation. The primary analysis was based on the intention-to-treat principle.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was change from baseline to 8 weeks in accelerometer-measured daily time expending at least 3 METs. A total of 152 participants (72% male; mean [SD] FEV₁ percent predicted, 50.5% [21.2]; median [first quartile, third quartile] time expending ≥3 METs, 46 [21, 92] min) were enrolled and assigned to the intervention (n = 76) or control (n = 76) arm. There was no significant difference in change in time expending at least 3 METs between the intervention and control groups at 8 weeks (median [first quartile, third quartile] difference, 0.5 [-1.0, 31.0] min; P = 0.87) or at the 6-month follow-up (7.0 [-9, 27] min; P = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Pedometer-directed step-count targets during an outpatient PR program did not enhance moderate-intensity physical activity levels in people with COPD. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01719822).

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for muscle weakness in adults with advanced disease

BACKGROUND

This review is an update of a previously published review in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 1, 2013 on Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for muscle weakness in adults with advanced disease.Patients with advanced progressive disease often experience muscle weakness, which can impact adversely on their ability to be independent and their quality of life. In those patients who are unable or unwilling to undertake whole-body exercise, neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may be an alternative treatment to enhance lower limb muscle strength. Programmes of NMES appear to be acceptable to patients and have led to improvements in muscle function, exercise capacity, and quality of life. However, estimates regarding the effectiveness of NMES based on individual studies lack power and precision.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of NMES on quadriceps muscle strength in adults with advanced disease. Secondary objectives: to examine the safety and acceptability of NMES, and its effect on peripheral muscle function (strength or endurance), muscle mass, exercise capacity, breathlessness, and health-related quality of life.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified studies from searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) (the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (OVID), Embase (OVID), CINAHL (EBSCO), and PsycINFO (OVID) databases to January 2016; citation searches, conference proceedings, and previous systematic reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials in adults with advanced chronic respiratory disease, chronic heart failure, cancer, or HIV/AIDS comparing a programme of NMES as a sole or adjunct intervention to no treatment, placebo NMES, or an active control. We imposed no language restriction.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data on study design, participants, interventions, and outcomes. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. We calculated mean differences (MD) or standardised mean differences (SMD) between intervention and control groups for outcomes with sufficient data; for other outcomes we described findings from individual studies. We assessed the evidence using GRADE and created a 'Summary of findings' table.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighteen studies (20 reports) involving a total of 933 participants with COPD, chronic respiratory disease, chronic heart failure, and/or thoracic cancer met the inclusion criteria for this update, an additional seven studies since the previous version of this review. All but one study that compared NMES to resistance training compared a programme of NMES to no treatment or placebo NMES. Most studies were conducted in a single centre and had a risk of bias arising from a lack of participant or assessor blinding and small study size. The quality of the evidence using GRADE comparing NMES to control was low for quadriceps muscle strength, moderate for occurrence of adverse events, and very low to low for all other secondary outcomes. We downgraded the quality of evidence ratings predominantly due to inconsistency among study findings and imprecision regarding estimates of effect. The included studies reported no serious adverse events and a low incidence of muscle soreness following NMES.NMES led to a statistically significant improvement in quadriceps muscle strength as compared to the control (12 studies; 781 participants; SMD 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 0.87), equating to a difference of approximately 1.1 kg. An increase in muscle mass was also observed following NMES, though the observable effect appeared dependent on the assessment modality used (eight studies, 314 participants). Across tests of exercise performance, mean differences compared to control were statistically significant for the 6-minute walk test (seven studies; 317 participants; 35 m, 95% CI 14 to 56), but not for the incremental shuttle walk test (three studies; 434 participants; 9 m, 95% CI -35 to 52), endurance shuttle walk test (four studies; 452 participants; 64 m, 95% CI -18 to 146), or for cardiopulmonary exercise testing with cycle ergometry (six studies; 141 participants; 45 mL/minute, 95% CI -7 to 97). Limited data were available for other secondary outcomes, and we could not determine the most beneficial type of NMES programme.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The overall conclusions have not changed from the last publication of this review, although we have included more data, new analyses, and an assessment of the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. NMES may be an effective treatment for muscle weakness in adults with advanced progressive disease, and could be considered as an exercise treatment for use within rehabilitation programmes. Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. We recommend further research to understand the role of NMES as a component of, and in relation to, existing rehabilitation approaches. For example, studies may consider examining NMES as an adjuvant treatment to enhance the strengthening effect of programmes, or support patients with muscle weakness who have difficulty engaging with existing services.

Theory, experience and practice

Despite its potential hazards, the activity of questioning theoretical frameworks and proposing solutions is necessary if progress is even to be possible. Intellectual history has by no means ended, so we cannot expect to have all the answers, and from time to time the activity of critical questioning will be frustrating. But intellectual progress requires us to continue the process of asking fundamental questions. The alternative to thinking in this way is indeed unthinkable.