Evidence-based medicine - 2018. Quo Vadis?

"Passion to do the right thing": searching for the 'good' in physiotherapist practice

BACKGROUND

Practitioners' perspectives of what constitutes a 'good' physiotherapist have not been explicitly examined despite their potential implications for the future practice of physiotherapy. Physiotherapists' perceptions may inform professional priorities including education curricula, professional practices, competency profiles, and patient interactions.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this research was to examine physiotherapists' perceptions of what constitutes a 'good' physiotherapist. The context of the study was musculoskeletal practice (MSK).

METHODS

A hermeneutic phenomenological investigation was undertaken. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twelve experienced MSK physiotherapists to examine their perceptions of what constitutes a 'good' physiotherapist.

FINDINGS

Seven themes were identified. Good physiotherapists were depicted as: 1) oriented to care; 2) integrating knowledge sources; 3) competent; 4) responsive; 5) reflective; 6) communicative; and 7) reasoning. To deepen the understanding of these themes, we discuss the findings in relation to Joan Tronto's ethic of care theory.

CONCLUSIONS

Physiotherapists' perceptions of what constitutes a 'good' physiotherapist highlight practices that may underpin an ethic of care including the pivotal role of person-centered and relational dimensions of practice. The findings call into question the profession's emphasis on a technical rationalist approach to education and clinical practice and invites conversation about future directions that balance technical competence with relational dimensions of practice.

Supporting care engagement in primary care; the development of a maturity matrix

BACKGROUND

Care engagement or active patient involvement in healthcare contributes to the quality of primary care, but organisational preconditions in routine practice need to be aligned. A Maturity Matrix for Care Engagement to assess and discuss these preconditions in the general practice team was developed and tested on feasibility and acceptability in general practice.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

A systematic user-centred approach was applied, starting with a scoping literature search to describe the domains on the horizontal axis of the maturity matrix. The domains and growing steps (vertical axis) were refined by patients (n = 16) and general practice staff (n = 11) in three focus group discussions and reviewed by six experts (local facilitators and scientists). Seven domains could be distinguished: Personalised Care, Shared Decision Making, Self-Management, Patient as Partner, Supportive Means, Patient Environment, and Teamwork among Healthcare Professionals. The growing steps described three to six activities per domain (n = 32 in total) that contribute to care engagement. Local facilitators implemented the tool in two general practice teams according to a user guide, starting with a two-hour kick-off meeting on care engagement. In the next step, practitioners, nurses and assistants in each practice indicated their score on the domains individually. The scores were discussed in the facilitated practice meeting which was aimed at SMART improvement plans. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed in interviews showing that the tool was well received by the pilot practices, although the practice assistants had difficulties scoring some of the activities as they did not always relate to their daily work. An assessment after three months showed changes in practice organisation towards increased care engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

The maturity matrix on care engagement is a tool to identify the organisational practice maturity for care engagement. Suggested adaptations must be implemented before large-scale testing.

Has anything changed in Evidence-Based Medicine?

The Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) movement, undoubtably one of the most successful movements in medicine, questions dogma and "clinical authority" and combines the "best available evidence" with clinical expertise and patient values in order to provide the best care for the individual patient. Although since its inception in the 1990s its strong theoretical foundations remain unaltered, a lot has changed in its practical implementation due to the electronic explosion of information and the unprecedented COVID-19 crisis. The purpose of this article is to succinctly provide the reader with an update on the major changes in EBM, including the important most recent ones that were "fast-tracked" due to the COVID-19 challenge.

Evidence-based medicine's curious path: From clinical epidemiology to patient-centered care through decision analysis

Evidence-based medicine (EBM), one of the most important movements in health care, has been a lightning rod for controversy. Conflicts about the meaning and value of EBM are owing in part to lack of clarity about basic questions regarding its development, the importance of expertise and intuition, and the role of evidence in clinical decision making. These issues have persisted in part because of unclarity at the outset, but also because of how EBM evolved, why it was introduced when it was, and how it was modified following its introduction. This paper traces the evolution of EBM from clinical epidemiology (CE) and the internal dispute that precipitated the developers to establish EBM as a distinct approach to clinical practice. The paper proposes that health care industrialization also had a significant role in EBM's emergence and that industrialization influenced the decision to merge EBM with the method of normative decision making known as decision analysis (DA). The paper discusses the impact of this merger, in particular how it led to EBM's identification with managed care and has added momentum to the effort at forging a connection between a normative decision model and clinical judgement. This effort would turn clinical decision making into a conduit for bringing administrative rules and regulations into the consulting room and would result in expertise becoming a surplus skill. The paper closes by discussing a challenge yet unmet by EBM's advocates and critics-to chronicle the dangers that EBM in the framework of DA during the current era of industrialization poses to health and health care, and discover ways of unhinging the relationship between model and judgement.

The multiple faces of practical wisdom in complex clinical practices: An empirical exploration

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES

In recent publications, attention has been drawn to the importance of practical wisdom in order to ensure good, individually attuned care in complex clinical practices. However, what remains insufficiently elucidated is how practical wisdom emerges in the workplace. This study aims to describe manifestations of practical wisdom in medical practices within a general hospital. It also seeks to clarify the interruptions that can be considered as triggers for the emergence of practical wisdom. Furthermore, we searched for figurations, which possibly elicit or constrain the emergence of practical wisdom.

METHODS

We used 10 thick descriptions of very distinct patient cases to carry out an explorative qualitative heuristic in-depth analysis.

RESULTS

These varied cases enabled us to describe diverse manifestations of practical wisdom; in addition, we were able to discern 10 different "interruptions" that triggered practical wisdom, and finally, we hypothesize that certain infrastructural figurations might facilitate the manifestation of practical wisdom.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that practical wisdom frequently emerged in unexpected and diverse guises in these clinical practices, although the "interruptions" that we discovered did not automatically trigger practical wisdom. We have investigated the figurations mentioned only to a limited degree. More empirical research is needed to make the philosophical concept of practical wisdom better manageable for clinical practices and to gain better understanding of the figurations that elicit or obstruct its manifestation.

US-based risk stratification "guidelines" for thyroid nodules: Quō Vādis?

PURPOSE

This rapid scoping review addresses the commentary titled the ACR TI-RADS™: An Advance in the Management of Thyroid Nodules or Pandora's Box of Surveillance? suggesting that the 2017 American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS™-2017) adds to a plethora of existing guidelines, incorporates an inconsistent lexicon, and potentially contradicts recommendations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The author performed a rapid scoping review using a combination of English keywords to identify and review peer reviewed articles contained in electronic databases (e-databases) comparing 2 or more guidelines for managing adult thyroid nodules (GMTNs) with (UGMTNs) and without (non-UGMTNs) ultrasound. E-databases included Medline (PubMed), EBSCO, Google, and Google Scholar published (2010-2019).

RESULTS

The search returned 28 articles, where the author identified 12 different guidelines. Most articles evaluated diagnostic performance (N = 26), not quality (N = 2) measures. The most commonly reviewed UGMTNs were in descending order ATA-2015, ACR TI-RADS™-2017, South Korean, and EU TI-RADS. No article reviewed all GMTNs or identified a generally accepted UGMTNs or non-UGMTNs. Primary origin continents were: North America (U.S.A), Asia (Japan, South Korea, Thailand), Europe (France, Italy, U.K.), and South America (Chile).

CONCLUSION

A plethora of UGMTNs may exist. No guideline enjoys general acceptance and evaluations of performance and quality vary.