Beyond uncertainty: Negative findings for the association between the use of proton pump inhibitors and risk of dementia

Proton pump inhibitors and dementia: what association?

Several recent studies have suggested an association between proton pump inhibitors and the development of cognitive changes.

Objective

To assess the existence of this association.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted including guidelines, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, observational and experimental studies published between February 2011 and February 2021.

Results

The initial research identified 393 articles, 28 of which were included: 8 systematic reviews, 1 clinical trial, 15 observational studies, 3 case-control studies, and 1 cross-sectional observational study.

Conclusions

Most studies classified with the highest level of evidence found no statistically significant association between the use of proton pump inhibitors and the development of cognitive impairment or dementia.

Time-Varying Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Real-World Analysis from Germany

BACKGROUND

Cumulative evidence of dementia risk in patients taking proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is still inconclusive, probably due to a variety of study designs.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare how the association between dementia risk and use of PPIs differs by different outcome and exposure definitions.

METHODS

We conceptualized a target trial using claims data with 7,696,127 individuals aged 40 years or older without previous dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians in Bavaria. Dementia was defined as either including or excluding MCI to compare how the results alter by different outcome definitions. We used weighted Cox models to estimate the PPI initiation effect on dementia risk and weighted pooled logistic regression to assess the effect of time-varying use versus non-use during 9 years of study period, including 1 year of wash-out period (2009-2018). The median follow-up time of PPI initiators and non-initiators was 5.4 and 5.8 years, respectively. We also evaluated the association between each PPI agent (omeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, esomeprazole, and combined use) and dementia risk.

RESULTS

A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk. A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.

CONCLUSION

Our large study supports existing evidence that PPI use is related to an increased risk of dementia.

Do proton pump inhibitors increase the risk of dementia? A systematic review, meta-analysis and bias analysis

AIM

Previous studies on the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) intake and the increased risk of dementia has shown discrepancies in their conclusions. We aimed to provide updated evidence based on extensive bias assessments and quantitative sensitivity analyses.

METHODS

We searched the databases PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov for prospective studies that examined an association between PPI use and dementia, up to February 2022. Each study was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tools for non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) or randomized trials (RoB2). Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% prediction intervals were computed using random-effects models. Sensitivity analyses were adjusted for small-study bias.

RESULTS

We included nine observational studies with 204 108 dementia cases in the primary analysis on the association between PPI use vs. non-use and dementia, and the RR was 1.16 (95% CI = 1.00; 1.35). After adjusting for small-study bias by Copas selection model and Rücker's shrinkage procedure, the RR was 1.16 (1.02; 1.32) and 1.15 (1.13; 1.17), respectively. A subgroup analysis of PPI use vs. non-use regarding Alzheimer's disease risk yielded an RR of 1.15 (0.89; 1.50). The secondary analysis on the risk of dementia by use of PPI vs. histamine-2 receptor antagonist showed an RR of 1.03 (0.66; 1.62).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis provided no clear evidence for an association between PPI intake and the risk of dementia. Due to discrepancies in sensitivity analyses, however, some risk of dementia by PPI use cannot be ruled out. Since an unequivocal conclusion is still pending, further research is warranted.

Signal and Noise: Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Risk of Dementia?

The association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and dementia remains controversial. This cohort study re-examines this issue, addressing shortcomings identified in previous publications using a population-based and a high-dimension propensity-score matched cohort to follow patients for up to 22 years. Cox regression models using baseline characteristics, a lag period, and time-varying variables were used to examine the risk of dementia by cumulative PPI exposure. High-dose PPI users (> 180 days of use) had significantly higher risk of dementia in crude Cox models. After adjustment for medical diagnoses and prescription drug use, these associations disappeared. Among high-dose users starting PPI therapy between 46 and 55 years old, the unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 1.55 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14, 2.10); the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was 1.10 (95% CI 0.80, 1.51). For high-dose users starting therapy between 56 and 65 years, HR = 1.22 (95% CI1.03, 1.44); aHR = 0.99 (95% CI 0.83, 1.17). High-dose users between the ages of 66 and 75 years had no association with the risk of dementia. The use of lag models or time-varying parameters similarly found some association with dementia in crude, but not multivariable Cox models. Although high-dose PPI users were more likely to develop dementia, they were more likely to be diagnosed with dementia risk factors, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease, which are risk factors for dementia. Controlling for these conditions using multivariable models or a propensity-score matched cohort eliminated this association.

Emulating a target trial of proton pump inhibitors and dementia risk using claims data

BACKGROUND

Understanding the adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is important due to their widespread use, but the available evidence for an increased dementia risk among patients taking PPIs is inconclusive. The present study aimed to estimate the causal effect of PPIs on the risk of dementia by target trial emulation and time-varying exposure modeling.

METHODS

Using claims data of 2,698,176 insured people of a large German statutory health insurer, we conceptualized a target trial in which individuals aged 40 years and older were classified as PPI initiators or non-initiators between 2008 and 2018, and followed until diagnosis of dementia, death, loss to follow-up or end of study. Incidence of dementia (ICD-10 codes F00, F01, F03, F05.1, G30, G31.0, G31.1, G31.9, and F02.8+G31.82) was defined applying a 1-year lag window. We used weighted Cox models to estimate the effect of PPI initiation vs. non-initiation on dementia risk and weighted pooled logistic regression to estimate the effect of time-varying use vs. non-use.

RESULTS

29,746 PPI initiators (4.4%) and 26,830 non-initiators (1.3%) were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.54 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.51-1.58). The HR for time-dependent PPI use vs. non-use was 1.56 (95% CI: 1.50-1.63). Differentiated subtypes, including unspecified dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD), and vascular dementia (VaD), showed increased risk by PPI initiation and time-varying PPI use.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that PPI initiation and time-varying PPI use may increase overall dementia risk.

Gastric acid suppressants and cognitive decline in people with or without cognitive impairment

INTRODUCTION

Studies suggest associations between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and dementia risk; however, many neither considered histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) nor baseline cognitive status.

METHODS

Participants (National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Database; 2005-2021) using a PPI or H2RA were compared. Covariate-adjusted Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for progression from normal cognition to mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and from MCI to dementia over 5 years. In a propensity-score-matched subsample of mild-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD), mixed-effects negative binomial regression was used to estimate decline in delayed recall memory.

RESULTS

Compared to PPI, H2RA use was associated with earlier progression from MCI to dementia (HR = 1.40 [1.09-1.81]; n = 1701), and with faster memory decline in AD over time (rate ratio = 0.76 [0.64-0.92]; n = 628), but not with progression from normal cognition to MCI (HR = 0.94 [0.71-1.24]; n = 2784).

DISCUSSION

Compared to PPIs, H2RAs were associated with cognitive decline, specifically among people with pre-existing cognitive impairment.

A pharmacovigilance study of association between proton pump inhibitor and dementia event based on FDA adverse event reporting system data

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) was widely used around the world. Studies suggested conflicting results between PPI treatment and dementia event. This study examined the association between six PPI agents and dementia event by mining the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from 2004 to 2020. We employed proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and information element (IC) methods to detect the signals of dementia relevant to PPI. We also analyzed characteristics of PPI and positive control reports, compared dementia event between long- and short-duration of PPI treatment. Finally, we identified 2396 dementia cases with PPI treatment. We did not detect significant signal between PPI and dementia event: PRR = 0.98, 95%CI 0.94 to 1.02, IC = −0.03, 95%CI − 0.17 to 0.10, even in gastroesophageal reflux disease cases: PRR = 0.65, 95%CI 0.59 to 0.72, IC = −0.62, 95%CI − 0.97 to − 0.27. No significant differences of dementia event were detected between long- and short- duration groups, the OR (95%CI) of the 3 years, 5 years and 10 years comparison were 0.70 (0.48 to 1.02), 0.72 (0.45 to 1.15) and 1.65 (0.75 to 3.63), respectively. Based on the current FAERS data mining, we discovered no association between PPI use and dementia event, even in long-term PPI therapy case.

Trends in acid suppressant drug prescriptions in primary care in the UK: a population-based cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To examine proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) prescribing patterns over a 29-year period by quantifying annual prevalence and prescribing intensity over time.

DESIGN

Population-based cross-sectional study.

SETTING

More than 700 general practices contributing data to the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).

PARTICIPANTS

Within a cohort of 14 242 329 patients registered in the CPRD, 3 027 383 patients were prescribed at least one PPI or H2RA from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2018.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Annual prescription rates were estimated by dividing the number of patients prescribed a PPI or H2RA by the total CPRD population. Change in prescribing intensity (number of prescriptions per year divided by person-years of follow-up) was calculated using negative binomial regression.

RESULTS

From 1990 to 2018, 21.3% of the CPRD population was exposed to at least one acid suppressant drug. During that period, PPI prevalence increased from 0.2% to 14.2%, while H2RA prevalence remained low (range: 1.2%-3.4%). Yearly prescribing intensity to PPIs increased during the first 15 years of the study period but remained relatively constant for the remainder of the study period. In contrast, yearly prescribing intensity of H2RAs decreased from 1990 to 2009 but has begun to slightly increase over the past 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

While PPI prevalence has been increasing over time, its prescribing intensity has recently plateaued. Notwithstanding their efficacy, PPIs are associated with a number of adverse effects not attributed to H2RAs, whose prescribing intensity has begun to increase. Thus, H2RAs remain a valuable treatment option for individuals with gastric conditions.

Acid suppressants use and the risk of dementia: A population-based propensity score-matched cohort study

In this population-based propensity score matched (PSM) cohort study, we aimed to investigate the risk of developing dementia with the use of acid suppressants, including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2 antagonists). Cohorts of PPI users (n = 2,778), H2 antagonist users (n = 6,165), and non-users (n = 86,238) were selected from a dataset covering the years 2000 to 2010 in Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients in the three groups were PSM at a ratio of 1:1 within each comparison cohort (CC). Three CCs were created: (1) PPI users compared to non-users (CC1, n = 2,583 pairs); (2) H2 antagonist users compared to non-users (CC2, n = 5,955 pairs); and (3) PPI users compared to H2 antagonist users (CC3, n = 2,765 pairs). A multivariable robust Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the risk of developing dementia. The multivariable analysis results show that the aHR of developing dementia during the follow-up period was 0.72 (CC1: 95% CI = 0.51–1.03, P = 0.07) for PPI users and 0.95 (CC2: 95% CI = 0.74–1.22, P = 0.69) for H2 antagonist users, when compared to non-users. Between the patients using acid suppressants, there was no difference between PPI and H2 antagonist users in the risk of developing dementia (CC3: aHR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.58–1.17, P = 0.28). In conclusion, no association was observed between the use of acid suppressants and the risk of developing dementia in any of the three CCs. Further, randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm this relationship.

Cognitive problems of breast cancer survivors on proton pump inhibitors

PURPOSE

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are used in cancer patients to manage treatment-related gastrointestinal symptoms and to prevent damage to the gastric mucosal lining during treatment. However, PPI use may contribute to cognitive problems. To compare PPI-users and non-users, breast cancer survivors reported cognitive problems in three studies.

METHODS

In Study 1, breast cancer survivors (N = 209; n = 173 non-users, n = 36 PPI-users; stages 0-IIIC) rated their cognitive function on the Kohli scale prior to cancer treatment, as well as one and two years later. In Study 2, women (N = 200; n = 169 non-users, n = 31 PPI-users, stages 0-IIIa, M = 11 months post-treatment) rated their cognitive function on the Kohli scale and BCPT checklist at three visits over a six-month period. In Study 3, participants (N = 142; n = 121 non-users, n = 21 PPI-users; stages I-IIIa, M = 4 years post-treatment) rated their cognitive function on the Kohli scale, BCPT checklist, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy cognitive scale (FACT-cog).

RESULTS

In Study 1, PPI-users reported more severe concentration problems (p = 0.039) but not memory problems (p = 0.17) than non-users. In Study 2, PPI-users reported more severe concentration problems (p = 0.022) than non-users, but not memory problems or symptoms on the BCPT (ps = 0.11). Study 3's PPI-users reported more severe memory problems (p = 0.002), poorer overall cognitive function (p = 0.006), lower quality of life related to cognitive problems (p = 0.005), greater perceived cognitive impairment (p = 0.013), and poorer cognitive abilities (p = 0.046), but not more severe concentration problems (p = 0.16), compared to non-users.

CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS

PPI use may impair breast cancer survivors' memory, concentration, and quality of life.

Adverse Effects of Proton Pump Inhibitors-Evidence and Plausibility

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been increasingly used over the last decades and there are concerns about overuse and the numerous reported side-effects. It is uncertain whether associations between PPI use and potential side effects are causal. However, important evidence from experimental and mechanistic studies that could support a causal relationship may have been underestimated by epidemiologists and meta-analysists. In the current manuscript we review the combined epidemiological and mechanistic evidence of the adverse effects of PPI use.