A study of proximal esophageal baseline impedance in identifying and predicting laryngopharyngeal reflux

Overlapping Reflux Symptoms in Functional Dyspepsia Are Mostly Unrelated to Gastroesophageal Reflux

Background/Aims

Reflux symptoms frequently present in patients diagnosed with functional dyspepsia (FD). This investigation sought to elucidate the contribution of gastroesophageal reflux in the overlap relationship.

Methods

Consecutive patients presenting with reflux symptoms and/or FD symptoms were prospectively included. Comprehensive assessments, including symptoms evaluation, endoscopy, esophageal functional examinations (high-resolution manometry and reflux monitoring), and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment efficacy evaluation, were conducted in these patients.

Results

The study enrolled 315 patients, 43.2% of which had concurrent FD symptoms and overlapping reflux symptoms. Notably, a mere 28.7% of patients in the overlap symptoms group had objective gastroesophageal reflux disease evidences (the grade of esophagitis ≥ B or the acid exposure time ≥ 4.2%). Functional heartburn was demonstrated to be the main cause of overlapping reflux symptoms (55.1%). Reflux parameters analysis revealed that the reflux burden in the overlap symptoms group paralleled that of the FD symptoms group, with both registering lower levels than the reflux symptoms group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, PPI response rates were notably diminished in the overlap symptoms group (P < 0.001), even for those with objective gastroesophageal reflux disease evidences.

Conclusions

The study illuminated that overlapping reflux symptoms in FD was common. Strikingly, these symptoms primarily diverged from reflux etiology and exhibited suboptimal responses to PPI intervention. These findings challenge prevailing paradigms and accentuate the imperative for nuanced therapeutic approaches tailored to the distinctive characteristics of overlapping reflux symptoms in the context of FD.

Mucosal integrity of the larynx and hypopharynx and the response to proton pump inhibitors in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether impairment of integrity of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal mucosa in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) could be related to response to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

METHODS

Chronic hoarseness with Reflux Finding Score (RFS) > = 7 was evaluated using the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) and Reflux Symptoms Index (RSI). Upper endoscopy was performed and samples of the laryngeal posterior commissure were collected to evaluate ex vivo laryngeal mucosal integrity by transepithelial resistance (TER) using Ussing chamber. In vivo, hypopharyngeal integrity was measured using intraluminal impedance. Clinical responders scored < 13 and had a drop of at least 50% in the initial RSI after 8 weeks of pantoprazole.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients completed the protocol, Esophagitis was detected in 28% of the patients, and one patient presented acid exposure above 6%. After treatment, 66.67% responded to PPI. Laryngeal basal TER and TER drops after the weakly acidid challenge showed no difference between PPI responders and non-responders. Hypopharyngeal basal impedance was similar between the groups. After acid exposure test, there was a lower impedance in non-responders.

CONCLUSION

In laryngopharyngeal reflux, hypopharyngeal mucosal integrity was lower in PPI non-responders. These preliminary results suggest that the weaker laryngopharyngeal mucosa in refractory LPR may require new therapies aimed at improving barrier function.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

The Los Angeles-B esophagitis is a conclusive diagnostic evidence for gastroesophageal reflux disease: the validation of Lyon Consensus 2.0

Background and Aims

Recently, Lyon Consensus 2.0 recommended Los Angeles (LA)-B esophagitis as conclusive evidence and LA-A esophagitis as borderline evidence for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of LA-B and LA-A esophagitis.

Methods

Patients with typical reflux symptoms who underwent endoscopy examination and received acid-suppressive therapy from two tertiary hospitals [the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, P. R. China) and the Third People's Hospital of Chengdu (Chengdu, P. R. China)] were retrospectively included. Acid-suppression response rates, endoscopy results, motility, and reflux parameters were compared between patients with different grades of esophagitis.

Results

In total, 401 patients were enrolled, among whom 254 were without reflux esophagitis (RE), 51 had LA-A esophagitis, 44 had LA-B esophagitis, and 52 had LA-C/D esophagitis. Patients with LA-B esophagitis and LA-C/D esophagitis had significantly higher acid-suppressive response rates than non-RE patients (P < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was found between patients with LA-A esophagitis and non-RE patients (non-RE vs LA-A vs LA-B vs LA-C/D: 52.4% vs 70.6% vs 75.0% vs 82.7%). Among patients with LA-A esophagitis, those with a number of reflux episodes that exceeded 80 per day (90.0% vs 52.4%, P = 0.044) or hypotensive esophagogastric junction (72.4% vs 52.4%, P = 0.040) had significantly higher acid-suppressive response rates than non-RE patients.

Conclusions

LA-B esophagitis can be regarded as conclusive evidence for GERD and initiate acid-suppressive therapy. LA-A esophagitis did not establish a definite GERD diagnosis alone. When combined with adjunctive or supportive evidence, the acid-suppressive therapy response rate of LA-A esophagitis improved.

Risk Factors for Symptoms in Patients With Heterotopic Gastric Mucosa in the Upper Esophagus

Goal: This study is aimed at comparing the clinical characteristics and histological types of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with heterotopic gastric mucosa in the upper esophagus (HGMUE) and exploring the factors influencing the occurrence and severity of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms in these patients. Background: HGMUE is a potential cause of LPR symptoms. Study: This retrospective analysis evaluated 70 patients with HGMUE using a detailed questionnaire. Clinical, histological, high-resolution manometry, and 24-h pH impedance monitoring data were compared between symptomatic (n = 49) and asymptomatic (n = 21) patients. Results: The diameter of HGMUE was significantly larger in the symptomatic group (p < 0.05), and the incidence of LPR symptoms increased with larger diameter grades; male patients were more likely to have LPR symptoms. The incidence of LPR symptoms varied significantly across histological classifications, being highest in patients with the fundic type (χ 2 = 6.64, p < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis identified sex and histological type as risk factors for LPR symptoms, with odds ratios of 8.996 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.350-59.962) and 8.493 (95% CI: 1.486-48.522), respectively. The mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) in the upper esophagus was significantly lower in the symptomatic group (1676.82 ± 739.09 Ω vs. 2441.01 ± 604.11 Ω; p < 0.05). Clinical and demographic characteristics did not significantly affect the severity of LPR symptoms. Conclusion: The diameter, histological type, and sex of patients are risk factors for the occurrence of LPR symptoms in patients with HGMUE. More attention should be paid to patients with these factors. The MNBI is an effective indicator of the symptoms and treatment.

Esophageal Baseline Impedance is Associated with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Treatment Response

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of distal esophageal mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI), a general marker of esophageal mucosal barrier integrity, in predicting laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and symptomatic response to acid reflux therapy.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 173 patients who presented with symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux and underwent 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) testing. Mean nocturnal baseline impedance values were calculated and assessed for their association and ability to predict LPR symptoms, MII-pH results, treatment response, and other markers of LPR.

RESULTS

Notably, 153 of the 173 patients were tested off acid suppression medication and included in statistical analysis. Based on the MII-pH probe data, 108 (71%) patients had LPR, 8 (5%) had gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and 37 (24%) were without pathologic reflux. Distal esophageal MNBI of LPR patients was significantly lower in LPR patients than patients with negative studies (1332 ± 94.8 vs. 2158 ± 173.5, p = 0.001). Among 118 patients who trialed antireflux therapy, a distal esophageal MNBI cutoff value of <1580 Ω was an independent predictor of treatment response (OR = 4.148 [1.877-9.189]). This value better predicted improvement with antireflux therapy for LPR than other objective MII-pH probe data, which were not independent predictors of treatment response.

CONCLUSION

Distal esophageal MNBI values may have value in the diagnosis of LPR and potentially predict medication responsiveness in LPR patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:4071-4077, 2024.

Anatomic and Manometric Abnormalities of the Upper and Lower Esophageal Sphincters in Patients With Reflux Disease

RESEARCH QUESTION

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) may cause inflammation of the laryngeal and pharyngeal mucosa. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) involves retrograde flow of gastric content into the esophagus below the upper esophageal sphincter (UES). The goal of this study was to investigate the esophageal anatomical and manometric variations of the esophagus in patients with LPR and/or GERD.

METHODS

Adult voice center patients who underwent diagnostic workup for reflux complaints with 24-hour multichannel intraluminal pH-impedance testing and esophageal manometry were included in this retrospective study. Subjects were classified as having LPR (>10 proximal reflux events), LPR + GERD (>10 proximal reflux events plus >73 distal reflux events) or were assigned to a control group (≤10 proximal events and ≤73 distal reflux events) based on pH study results. Anatomic and manometric parameters were evaluated between groups.

RESULTS

There were 169 cases (65 male, 104 female) included in this study. The average age was 50.50 ± 17.29. Subjects in the LPR group had significantly higher UES relaxation pressures and greater UES length compared with the control group. Lower esophageal sphincter relaxation pressure was significantly higher in the control group compared with the LPR group or the GERD + LPR group. Subjects in the GERD + LPR group had a significantly shorter intra-abdominal portion of the lower esophageal sphincter compared with the LPR only group and the control group. Intrabolus pressure was significantly lower in both the LPR group and the LPR + GERD group compared with the control group. Distal wave amplitude was significantly lower in the LPR + GERD group compared to both the LPR group and the control group. The percentage of swallows with incomplete clearance was significantly greater in the LPR + GERD group than both the control group and the LPR group. The LPR group had significantly fewer swallows with incomplete clearance than the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic and manometric abnormalities are present in subjects with LPR with or without GERD and may contribute to the pathogenesis of reflux disease. Further research is needed to confirm or refute these findings.

Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: Past, Present, and Future-A Mini-Review

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a variant of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in which gastric refluxate irritates the lining of the aerodigestive tract and causes troublesome airway symptoms or complications. LPR is a prevalent disease that creates a significant socioeconomic burden due to its negative impact on quality of life, tremendous medical expense, and possible cancer risk. Although treatment modalities are similar between LPR and GERD, the diagnosis of LPR is more challenging than GERD due to its non-specific symptoms/signs. Due to the lack of pathognomonic features of endoscopy, mounting evidence focused on physiological diagnostic testing. Two decades ago, a dual pH probe was considered the gold standard for detecting pharyngeal acidic reflux episodes. Despite an association with LPR, the dual pH was unable to predict the treatment response in clinical practice, presumably due to frequently encountered artifacts. Currently, hypopharygneal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH catheters incorporating two trans-upper esophageal sphincter impedance sensors enable to differentiate pharyngeal refluxes from swallows. The validation of pharyngeal acid reflux episodes that are relevant to anti-reflux treatment is, therefore, crucial. Given no diagnostic gold standard of LPR, this review article aimed to discuss the evolution of objective diagnostic testing and its predictive role of treatment response.

Accuracy of High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry Metrics for Predicting Aspiration and Residue in Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Patients with Poor Pharyngeal Contractility

Several physiological metrics can be derived from pharyngeal high-resolution impedance manometry (HRPM), but their clinical relevance has not been well established. We investigated the diagnostic performance of these metrics in relation to videofluoroscopic (VFS) assessment of aspiration and residue in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. We analyzed 263 swallows from 72 adult patients (22-91 years) with diverse medical conditions. Metrics of contractility, upper esophageal sphincter (UES) opening and relaxation, flow timing, intrabolus distension pressure, and a global Swallow Risk Index (SRI) were derived from pressure-impedance recordings using pressure-flow analysis. VFS data were independently scored for airway invasion and pharyngeal residue using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale and the Normalized Residue Ratio Scale, respectively. We performed multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine the relationship of HRPM metrics with radiological outcomes and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy. We identified aspiration in 25% and pharyngeal residue in 84% of the swallows. Aspiration was independently associated with hypopharyngeal peak pressure < 65 mmHg (HypoPeakP) [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 5.27; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) (0.99-28.1); p = 0.051], SRI > 15 [OR 4.37; 95% CI (1.87-10.2); p < 0.001] and proximal esophageal contractile integral (PCI) < 55 mmHg·cm·s [OR 2.30; 95% CI (1.07-4.96); p = 0.034]. Pyriform sinus residue was independently predicted by HypoPeakP < 65 mmHg [OR 7.32; 95% CI (1.93-27.7); p = 0.003], UES integrated relaxation pressure (UES-IRP) > 3 mmHg [OR 2.96; 95% CI (1.49-5.88); p = 0.002], and SRI > 15 [OR 2.17; 95% CI (1.04-4.51); p = 0.039]. Area under ROC curve (AUC) values for individual HRPM metrics ranged from 0.59 to 0.74. Optimal cut-off values were identified. This study demonstrates the diagnostic value of certain proposed and adjunct HRPM metrics for identifying signs of unsafe and inefficient bolus transport in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia.

The role of pH-impedance monitoring in swallowing disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the current evidence about the usefulness and the place of pH study in the management of patients with swallowing disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) are found in approximately 30% of patients with esophageal or oropharyngeal dysphagia. Patients with suspected GERD may benefit from gastrointestinal endoscopy and proton pump inhibitors according to guidelines. The diagnosis of LPR in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia is more controversial because there are no gold standard and diagnostic guidelines. The clinical diagnosis based on empirical therapeutic trial is a reasonable first-line strategy, but many dysphagic patients should not respond to treatment. These patients require hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH), which is the most effective examination providing important information on GERD and LPR features. At the HEMII-pH, GERD patients often report upright (daytime) and supine (nighttime) liquid acid esophageal events with significant esophageal distal acid exposure time. LPR patients have more frequently upright (daytime) gaseous weakly acid or nonacid pharyngeal reflux events without distal esophageal acid exposure abnormalities in many times. The features of reflux at the HEMII-pH may indicate a personalized treatment for dysphagic patients combining proton pump inhibitors, alginate/magaldrate or gastroprokinetic in cases of esophageal dysmotility.

SUMMARY

GERD and LPR are prevalent causes of dysphagia. The large number of reflux patients who do not respond to empirical treatment makes important the awareness of otolaryngologists about pH-impedance monitoring indication, features, and interpretation.

Correlation of Esophageal Mean Nocturnal Baseline Impedance With Markers of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

OBJECTIVES

Mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) is a measure of the esophageal epithelial barrier function calculated via high-resolution impedance manometry and can be used as a diagnostic tool and treatment response predictor for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, its utility for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) has been minimally studied. We aimed to investigate the relationship of MNBI between patients with suspected LPR, healthy controls, and their 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) study results.

METHODS

Retrospective patient series analysis was performed of patients with suspected LPR and healthy controls who underwent 24-h MII-pH monitoring. MNBI values were calculated from impedance channels at the level of the hypopharynx, proximal esophagus, and distal esophagus. We compared these MNBI values between the subject groups with secondary analysis on MII-pH results, reflux symptom index, reflux findings score, DeMeester score, and salivary pepsin levels.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients with suspected LPR and 14 healthy controls were enrolled. Decreased distal esophageal MNBI was found to be significantly decreased in patients with suspected LPR compared with healthy controls (p < 0.01) and in subjects with positive MII-pH studies compared to negative MII-pH studies (p < 0.01). There were no significant correlations of MNBI at the hypopharynx or proximal esophagus.

CONCLUSION

Distal esophageal MNBI has significant correlations with many phenotypic and biological markers of LPR. These findings indicate that MNBI has the potential to be applied to LPR, similar to its emerging use as a diagnostic tool and treatment response predictor for GERD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 2022.

Mean nocturnal baseline impedance, a novel metric of multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring in diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease with increasing prevalence worldwide. However, the diagnosis of GERD is challenging because there are no definite gold standard criteria. Recently, a novel impedance parameter, namely mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI), has been proposed, which reflects the burden of longitudinal reflux and the integrity of esophageal mucosa. MNBI has shown an immense promise for increasing the diagnostic rate of multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring and predicting the response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or anti-reflux intervention in patients with reflux symptoms. The present paper reviews the association between baseline impedance and esophageal mucosal integrity, the acquisition of MNBI in 24-h MII-pH monitoring, the clinical utilization of MNBI in improving the diagnosis rate of GERD in patients with typical reflux symptoms, predicting the response to PPI or anti-reflux treatment in these patients, the utilization of MNBI in diagnosing patients with atypical symptoms or extra-esophageal symptoms, and the correlation between reflux burden and MNBI. MNBI should be routinely assessed using MII-pH monitoring.

The Number of Interstitial Cells of Cajal Differs Among Different Subtypes of Achalasia and is Related to Patients' Prognosis

INTRODUCTION

Achalasia is a primary esophageal motility disorder with heterogeneous manometric subtypes and prognosis, characterized by degeneration of the esophageal myenteric plexus, and reduction in interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs). This study aimed to explore the histopathologic characteristics of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) muscle from patients with achalasia with different subtypes and different prognosis.

METHODS

We examined specimens of LES muscle from 122 patients with achalasia who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy and from 10 control patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Hematoxylin-eosin staining was performed to assess inflammation infiltration, fibrosis, and atrophy. Specific immunohistochemical staining was performed to identify ICCs and neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS).

RESULTS

The number of ICCs in patients with type I achalasia was significantly lower than that in patients with type II achalasia, followed by that in control patients (type I vs type II vs control group= 0.4 vs 1.2 vs 9.5; P < 0.001). The number of nNOS-positive cells was significantly lower in patients with achalasia than that in control patients (type I vs type II vs control group = 0.0 vs 0.0 vs 8.0; P < 0.001). Nonrecurrent group had significantly more ICCs than recurrent group (type I: nonrecurrent vs recurrent = 1.0 vs 0.1; P = 0.010; type II: nonrecurrent vs recurrent = 2.0 vs 0.4; P = 0.004).

DISCUSSION

ICCs and nNOS-positive cells reduced significantly in LES muscle of patients with achalasia. The number of ICCs differed among different achalasia subtypes and was related to patients' clinical prognosis.

Normative Ambulatory Reflux Monitoring Metrics for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Systematic Review of 720 Healthy Individuals

OBJECTIVES

To review the normative data for acid, weakly acid, and nonacid proximal esophageal (PRE) and hypopharyngeal reflux (HRE) events in diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) using ambulatory reflux monitoring.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus.

REVIEW METHODS

A literature search was conducted about the normative data for PRE and HRE on multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH), hypopharyngeal-esophageal MII-pH (HEMII-pH), or oropharyngeal pH monitoring using PICOTS (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, timing, and setting) and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statements. Outcomes reviewed included device characteristics, impedance/pH sensor placements, study duration, number/average and percentiles of PRE or HRE occurrence, and the event characteristics (pH, composition, and position).

RESULTS

Of 154 identified studies, 18 met criteria for analysis, including 720 healthy individuals. HEMII-pH, MII-pH, and oropharyngeal pH monitoring were used in 7, 6, and 5 studies, respectively. The definition and inclusion/exclusion criteria of healthy individuals varied substantially across studies, with 6 studies considering only digestive symptoms to exclude potential LPR patients. Substantial heterogeneity across studies was noted, including impedance/pH sensor placements/configurations and definitions of composition (liquid, gas, mixed) and type (acid, weakly acid, nonacid) of PRE/HRE. The 95th percentile thresholds were 10 to 73 events for PRE, 0 to 10 events for HRE on HEMII-pH, and 40 to 128 for events with pH <6.0 on oropharyngeal pH monitoring. Most HREs were nonacid and occurred upright. The mean HRE among healthy individuals was 1.

CONCLUSION

The low number of studies and the heterogeneity in inclusion criteria, definitions, and characterization of PRE and HRE limit the establishment of consensual normative criteria for LPR on ambulatory reflux monitoring. Future large multicenter studies are needed.